Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion CNNIC Root Inclusion
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mike Chen  
View profile  
 More options Jan 28 2010, 1:24 am
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.security.policy
From: Mike Chen <ccp0...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 28 2010 1:24 am
Subject: Re: CNNIC Root Inclusion
On Jan 28, 10:27 am, Warren <wenh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 28, 1:11 am, Nelson Bolyard <NOnelsonS...@NObolyardSPAM.me>
> wrote:

> > On 2010-01-27 06:18 PST, Eddy Nigg wrote:

> > I've also seen a lot of confusion in the past over who is the source if
> > signed software.  A lot of people assume that the certificate issuer,
> > rather than the certificate subject, is the source of the signed software.

> > Now, we come to the immediate cases to which Eddy provided links:

> > >http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client...

> > >http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/cnnic.net.cn

> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Internet_Network_Information_Cente...

> > I cannot determine, from the information presented on those pages, if CNNIC
> > was itself the source (the signer) of the signed software, or was merely the
> > issuer of certificates that were used by other subjects to sign malware.
> > The middle of those 3 links says that CNNIC had links to another site,
> > tech.sina.com.cn, which on its face seems to be another organization.
> > This doesn't seem inconsistent with CNNIC's role as a CA.

> > I think we need to be very careful to avoid getting caught in the trap of
> > thinking of certificates as attestations of morality or competence, and
> > thinking of CAs as judges of morality or competence.  If we allow the role
> > of CAs to become defined as being those judges, they will CERTAINLY FAIL.
> > So, let's define their role as doing something at which they can succeed,
> > namely attesting to binding of keys to vetted identities.

> I agree with Eddy. We are not talking about who signed this software.

> I am a Chinese internet user. CNNIC has produced a software called
> CNNIC_Zhong_Wen_Shang_Wang which is well-known malware software in
> China. Beside, I remembered that this software is signed by Verisign,
> need to confirm, because CNNIC is not a trusted root CA at that time.

> This software are usually installed by users' mistake activity. After
> installed, pop-up windows, ADs, force IE homepage and etc. are all
> coming. And it's very difficult to uninstall.

> I don't know whether current verison of this software is still
> malware. But you can also found some infomation from google by
> searching "cnnic malware" (without quotes), or you can found some
> Chinese people around you to search "CNNIC 中文上网" (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=CNNIC+%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%...
> ). Almost all results are relative to "How can I uninstall the d*mn
> CNNIC_Zhong_Wen_Shang_Wang".

> I don't know whether this certificate will be used for phishing SSL
> session in future. But I think the worries are reasonable, because of
> the internet censorship in China and GFW project.
> Given this organization's past behavior, I personally untrust this
> certificate.

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_People%27s_Re...

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Shield_Project   (GFW)

Totally agree.

CAs issues certificates to bring people trust, how can people trust
websites signed by a non-trusted CA issuer?
Some say it's about politic, and yes, it can and eventually will be
used by government for censorship. CNNIC is directly controlled by PRC
government, that's make no sense that CNNIC can issue with justice.

What can be a nightmare is one day I figure out that Gmail's
certificate is issued by CNNIC and my browser trusts it. THAT SHOULD
NEVER EVER HAPPEN.

So please checkout what people are saying about CNNIC on twitter. A
not trusted organization should never be trust by browsers.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.