if i could type faster...
$Zero
i'd probably end up never doing anything other than typing.
that's why i need to keep using different tools...
like musical instruments, video cameras, paint-brushes, table saws,
construction paper, flip flops, etc..
-$Zero...
i'm a big "why?" person
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/a49e791bb4c5dc10
Sylvia
> if i could type faster...
>
> i'd probably end up never doing anything other than typing.
>
> that's why i need to keep using different tools...
>
> like musical instruments, video cameras, paint-brushes, table saws,
<...>
<perk!>
Whadda doin't with a table saw?
> construction paper, flip flops, etc..
--
Sylvia <--- The Supreme Ruler of MW and A (Real) Tool Girl
$Zero
> Mr. $Zero wrote:
> > if i could type faster...
>
> > i'd probably end up never doing anything other than typing.
>
> > that's why i need to keep using different tools...
>
> > like musical instruments, video cameras, paint-brushes, table saws,
>
> <...>
>
> � � � <perk!>
>
> Whadda doin't with a table saw?
nothing right now.
someone stole it from my warehouse.
> > construction paper, flip flops, etc..
>
> --
> Sylvia �<--- The Supreme Ruler of MW and A (Real) Tool Girl
tools rock!
-$Zero...
the easiest way to begin to create/write a story is...
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/d3ac4cc06cd41f78
Ray Haddad
and Sylvia <syl...@cliffhangerREMOVE.com> instead replied:
>Whadda doin't with a table saw?
Anybody?
--
Ray
Sylvia
> Sylvia wrote:
> > Mr. $Zero wrote:
> > > if i could type faster...
> >
> > > i'd probably end up never doing anything other than typing.
> >
> > > that's why i need to keep using different tools...
> >
> > > like musical instruments, video cameras, paint-brushes, table saws,
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > ? ? ? <perk!>
> >
> > Whadda doin't with a table saw?
>
> nothing right now.
>
> someone stole it from my warehouse.
<tiny tears>
That's so sad! Was it Sir Throcky?
<bitterly>
He stole me power tools!
> > > construction paper, flip flops, etc..
> >
> > --
> > Sylvia ?<--- The Supreme Ruler of MW and A (Real) Tool Girl
>
> tools rock!
Oh, yeah! http://tinyurl.com/Tools-Rock
--
Sylvia
Stan (the Man)
news:8trs74t3gp5ea2udh...@4ax.com:
No need for you to infect a fun thread with your stupidity, scum-boy.
There's no one involved in it who has the slightest interest in anything
you have to say, and there are no 11-yr old girls around here for you to
stalk.
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
I typed one word and look what you did to it. Man, you are one hate
filled copper. And, still obsessed with little girls, too. Still
making false accusations. Still being a real pork chop. I can see
that even as you deny it, you are very, very interested in both me
and your little girl fantasies. Hehehe. Good one, Stan. Nobody
mentions little girls any more. Except for you.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:03:42 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>
>>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>>news:8trs74t3gp5ea2udh...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:42:26 -0500, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>>> and Sylvia <syl...@cliffhangerREMOVE.com> instead replied:
>>>
>>>>Whadda doin't with a table saw?
>>>
>>> Anybody?
>>
>>No need for you to infect a fun thread with your stupidity, scum-boy.
>>There's no one involved in it who has the slightest interest in
>>anything you have to say, and there are no 11-yr old girls around here
>>for you to stalk.
>
> I typed one word and look what you did to it. Man, you are one hate
> filled copper. And, still obsessed with little girls, too. Still
> making false accusations.
Yet you still can't name one false accusation I've made, scum-boy.
Still being a real pork chop. I can see
> that even as you deny it, you are very, very interested in both me
> and your little girl fantasies. Hehehe. Good one, Stan. Nobody
> mentions little girls any more. Except for you.
Yeah, except for all the others who see to it that you *never* post here
without everyone knowing what a repulsive piece of shit you are and that
you should *never* be allowed near little girls. Sucks for you, eh,
scum-boy?
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>news:vnvs7494f7elg93e8...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:03:42 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>>
>>>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>>>news:8trs74t3gp5ea2udh...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:42:26 -0500, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>>>> and Sylvia <syl...@cliffhangerREMOVE.com> instead replied:
>>>>
>>>>>Whadda doin't with a table saw?
>>>>
>>>> Anybody?
>>>
>>>No need for you to infect a fun thread with your stupidity, scum-boy.
>>>There's no one involved in it who has the slightest interest in
>>>anything you have to say, and there are no 11-yr old girls around here
>>>for you to stalk.
>>
>> I typed one word and look what you did to it. Man, you are one hate
>> filled copper. And, still obsessed with little girls, too. Still
>> making false accusations.
>
>Yet you still can't name one false accusation I've made, scum-boy.
Anything you write about me is false. Start with anything you write
about your own obsession with 11 year old girls. You just accused me
of being in this thread only to stalk little girls. That happens to
be your own fantasy, not mine. Then, of course, the one you probably
don't see at all because you're just too stupid is that you, not me,
have derailed this <cough> "fun filled" thread with your hatred.
> Still being a real pork chop. I can see
>> that even as you deny it, you are very, very interested in both me
>> and your little girl fantasies. Hehehe. Good one, Stan. Nobody
>> mentions little girls any more. Except for you.
>
>Yeah, except for all the others who see to it that you *never* post here
>without everyone knowing what a repulsive piece of shit you are and that
>you should *never* be allowed near little girls. Sucks for you, eh,
>scum-boy?
Others don't matter to me as much as a copper who somehow can't seem
to keep little girls out of his mind to the point of mentioning them
too often. Skip was right about you. <= Thanks, Geno!
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:13:30 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>
>>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>>news:vnvs7494f7elg93e8...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:03:42 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>>> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>>>
>>>>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>>>>news:8trs74t3gp5ea2udh...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:42:26 -0500, I said, "Pick a card, any
>>>>> card" and Sylvia <syl...@cliffhangerREMOVE.com> instead replied:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Whadda doin't with a table saw?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody?
>>>>
>>>>No need for you to infect a fun thread with your stupidity,
>>>>scum-boy. There's no one involved in it who has the slightest
>>>>interest in anything you have to say, and there are no 11-yr old
>>>>girls around here for you to stalk.
>>>
>>> I typed one word and look what you did to it. Man, you are one hate
>>> filled copper. And, still obsessed with little girls, too. Still
>>> making false accusations.
>>
>>Yet you still can't name one false accusation I've made, scum-boy.
>
> Anything you write about me is false.
Yet you still can't name one false accusation I've made, scum-boy. All
you can do is make some vague references. Doesn't work, scum-boy.
Start with anything you write
> about your own obsession with 11 year old girls. You just accused me
> of being in this thread only to stalk little girls. That happens to
> be your own fantasy, not mine. Then, of course, the one you probably
> don't see at all because you're just too stupid is that you, not me,
> have derailed this <cough> "fun filled" thread with your hatred.
Once you've shit in a thread, no one can sully it any further, scum-boy.
>> Still being a real pork chop. I can see
>>> that even as you deny it, you are very, very interested in both me
>>> and your little girl fantasies. Hehehe. Good one, Stan. Nobody
>>> mentions little girls any more. Except for you.
>>
>>Yeah, except for all the others who see to it that you *never* post
>>here without everyone knowing what a repulsive piece of shit you are
>>and that you should *never* be allowed near little girls. Sucks for
>>you, eh, scum-boy?
>
> Others don't matter to me as much as a copper who somehow can't seem
> to keep little girls out of his mind to the point of mentioning them
> too often. Skip was right about you. <= Thanks, Geno!
And those little girls will remain utmost in my mind as long as there
are repulsive pieces of shit like you around posing a danger to them.
Sucks for you, eh, scum-boy?
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>And those little girls will remain utmost in my mind
I know. Sad for them, really. Stay away from them, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:54:16 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>
>> And those little girls will remain utmost in my mind as long as there
>> are repulsive pieces of shit like you around posing a danger to them.
>> Sucks for you, eh, scum-boy?
>
> I know. Sad for them, really. Stay away from them, Stan.
You can keep trying to twist all you like, scum-boy, as long as we keep you
out in the open where you can do less harm. Everyone here knows exactly
what you are: A repulsive piece of shit who should *never* be allowed near
little girls.
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>news:gh3t745soidumq0aq...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:54:16 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>>
>>> And those little girls will remain utmost in my mind as long as there
>>> are repulsive pieces of shit like you around posing a danger to them.
>>> Sucks for you, eh, scum-boy?
>>
>> I know. Sad for them, really. Stay away from them, Stan.
>
>You can keep trying to twist all you like, scum-boy, as long as we keep you
>out in the open where you can do less harm. Everyone here knows exactly
>what you are: A repulsive piece of shit who should *never* be allowed near
>little girls.
And exactly how does this help on a newsgroup? Stan, what you're
doing is establishing your own reputation as someone who is totally
obsessed with little girls and what happens to them when you think
about them. Now here's the problem with your grandiose theory above.
Exactly how many little girls do you expect to see your words here?
How many of them will think you're a hero instead of what you really
are? You're the creepy old guy who does nothing but discuss little
girls when no one else is discussing them.
--
Ray
LN
>
> I typed one word and look what you did to it. Man, you are one hate
> filled copper. And, still obsessed with little girls, too. Still
> making false accusations. Still being a real pork chop. I can see
> that even as you deny it, you are very, very interested in both me
> and your little girl fantasies. Hehehe. Good one, Stan. Nobody
> mentions little girls any more. Except for you.
> --
> Ray
This is what you get when you take a plagiarized script copied and
pasted by Lloyd Press and deliver it in a cartoon Cagney voice.
Suggestions for improvement:
--work in the phrase "you dirty rat"
--punctuate with the word "see?"
--refer to yourself in the third person
--include some "yeah, that's right"
Result: You dirty rat, Ray typed one word and look what you did to it.
Man, you are one hate filled copper, see? And, still obsessed with
little girls, too. Yeah, that's right, still making false accusations,
see? Still being a real pork chop, see? Haddad can see that even as you
deny it, you are very, very interested in both me and your little girl
fantasies. Hehehe. Nobody mentions little girls any more, yeah, that's
right. Except for you, see?
Now, work in front of a mirror, Haddad, until you've got this one down
as pat as your French drop. That took you a decade; you don't have that
much time to get this one ready.
LNC
Stan (the Man)
How desperately you wish I was the only one who points at you and warns
that you should *never* be allowed near little girls. Have you forgotten
my promise again? Regardless, scum-boy, as long as you're kept out in
the open, I'm doing a service. And I'm going to continue keeping you out
in the open so as to be seen as exactly what you are: A repulsive piece
of shit who should *never* be allowed near little girls. As I said
before, if even one little girl is kept from your clutches, I'll have
succeeded.
--
Stan
Sylvia
"A pork chop"? WTF does Haddad mean?
--
Sylvia
Lessee, why would Mr. Stan, a police lieutenant, be focused on the thought
that young girls oughta be protected from the likes of Ray Haddad? Oh, yeah,
here's one reason:
Ray Haddad offers the men in a public forum a girl's email address, urging
them to contact her because "She's 15 now and nearly old enough for you to
bother" (a girl he claims he'd been "mentoring" and whose teacher he claims he
was before that):
"One other tip for you. There was a young lady who is a former
student of mine at Hale School. She used the hotmail account
of Rubber_Band_...@hotmail.com. Why don't you ask her for my
details. She's 15 now and nearly old enough for you to bother."
-- Ray Haddad, Jan 3 2002 alt.magic.secrets
Sylvia
Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote:
<...>
> And exactly how does this help on a newsgroup? Stan, what you're
> doing is establishing your own reputation as someone who is totally
> obsessed with little girls and what happens to them when you think
> about them. Now here's the problem with your grandiose theory above.
> Exactly how many little girls do you expect to see your words here?
> How many of them will think you're a hero instead of what you really
> are? You're the creepy old guy who does nothing but discuss little
> girls when no one else is discussing them.
> --
> Ray
Lessee, why would Mr. Stan, a police lieutenant, be focused on the thought
that young girls oughta be protected from the likes of Ray Haddad? Oh, yeah,
here's one reason:
Ray Haddad offers the men in a public forum a girl's email address, urging
them to contact her because "She's 15 now and nearly old enough for you to
bother" (a girl he claims he'd been "mentoring" and whose teacher he claims he
was before that):
"One other tip for you. There was a young lady who is a former
student of mine at Hale School. She used the hotmail account
of Rubber_Band_...@hotmail.com. Why don't you ask her for my
details. She's 15 now and nearly old enough for you to bother."
-- Ray Haddad, Jan 3 2002 alt.magic.secrets
--
Sylvia
Pies de Arcilla
As though you've forgotten that you argued "Rubber Band Man" was
actually Ray. He was obviously just making up the story about a young
girl in order to manipulate and intimidate other people. So you're
using this _fiction_ for the same purpose.
John Ashby
"Pies de Arcilla" <dear...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:daa6edcc-7079-4cd7...@27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
If Ray's story is true, it indicates at the least an unawareness of what is
appropriate behaviour towards minors when in a position of trust. If it is
untrue, that he chose that story, embellished it as he did and maintains
both its veracity and its appropriateness indicates the same thing.
john
LN
Way too mannered an explanation. He's just creepy.
LNC
Ray Haddad
But Stan, unless you're bringing them here, none of your little
girls are ever going to even see your posts. Besides, they have far
more to worry about from a creepy old guy who thinks about them as
much as you do without any reason for it. Except for a bizarre
picture of what you imagine in your own fantasies. Keep it up, Stan.
I like seeing you post your sickening descriptions of your fantasies
about little girls and how you want to "protect them" on a newsgroup
where they aren't even present. Show's what you're made of.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
He insists his description of his relationship with those little girls
is the absolute truth and wholly appropriate. Doesn't matter though.
Either it was the truth and he believes it appropriate, in which case
he's a repulsive piece of shit who should *never* be allowed near little
girls, or he's defending as appropriate the disgusting behavior he lied
about, in which case he's a repulsive piece of shit who should *never*
be allowed near little girls.
--
Stan
Stan (the Man)
Then, you're going to love seeing it even more, scum-boy, because it's
going to continue and continue and continue. You will *never* post here
without everyone knowing exactly what you are: A repulsive piece of shit
who should *never* be allowed near little girls.
--
Stan
Stan (the Man)
news:sylvia-4134E4....@newsfarm.nyc.highwinds-media.com:
He hasn't a clue. He just tosses out words, desperately hoping to sound
clever, desperately hoping one will score him even a minor point. In the
end, he remains a repulsive piece of shit. Try as he might, he just
can't get away from that fact.
--
Stan
Ultraviolet
<>
> If Ray's story is true, it indicates at the least an unawareness
> of what is appropriate behaviour towards minors when in a position
> of trust. If it is untrue, that he chose that story, embellished
> it as he did and maintains both its veracity and its
> appropriateness indicates the same thing.
I think I said a similar thing a while back, but this is much better.
Bernie
"Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:Xns9ADE49001E8CBne...@199.45.49.11...
Yup, even when he *thinks* he's got people stumped he blows it.
In Australian slang, a *person* is not referred to as "a pork
chop".
The local slang expression is: "To carry on like a pork chop",
which means "to behave foolishly".
So who's carrying on like a pork chop
here, then?
Right, you guessed it.
A clear case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.
Bernie.
>
Alan Hope
You're not fooling anyone, Haddad. Try again in ten years, when there might be people reading who don't know you.
--
AH
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girls
Stan, this obsession of yours is sick, just sick.
--
Ray
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girls
Resist the urge, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Twist all you like, scum-boy, as long as you stay out in the open where
everyone can see you and know that you're a repulsive piece of shit who
should *never* be allowed near any little girls.
--
Stan
Stan (the Man)
No need, scum-boy. I'll just continue to make certain that you *never* post
here without everyone knowing that you're a repulsive piece of shit who
shoule *never* be allowed near little girls.
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girls
Stan! Stop! You're starting to worry the peanut gallery.
--
Ray
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girls
Are you sure you want to be on record as mentioning little girls and
your fascination and other fantasies?
--
Ray
LNC
The voice of experience.
LNC
Ray Haddad
and LNC <ugotta...@me.org> instead replied:
>Ray Haddad wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:10:17 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>>
>>> little girls
>>
>> Resist the urge, Stan.
>
>The voice of experience.
Stan may be the voice of experience but he's just not able to resist
his urges.
--
Ray
LNC
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:56:42 -0700, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and LNC <ugotta...@me.org> instead replied:
>
>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:10:17 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>>> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>>>
>>>> little girls
>>> Resist the urge, Stan.
>> The voice of experience.
>
> Stan may be the voice of experience but he's just not able to resist
> his urges.
> --
> Ray
Don't worry, Pee Wee. You'll get your bike back.
LNC
Ultraviolet
What peanut gallery?
Stan (the Man)
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:57:07 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>
>>little girls
>
> Stan! Stop!
No, scum-boy. I'll just continue to inform and remind everyone about what a
repulsive piece of shit you are and how you should *never* be allowed near
little girls. Sucks for you, eh, scum-boy?
--
Stan
Stan (the Man)
Twist all you like, scum-boy, but you remain the repulsive piece of shit
who brags about having encouraged adults to bother a little girl who you
admitted you knew was too young for adults to bother. And, much as you'd
love to deny that, you can't run from the archives, scum-boy.
--
Stan
Stan (the Man)
Yep. I'll continue to give in to the urge to out you as a repulsive piece
of shit who should *never* be allowed near little girls, scum-boy.
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girl
This is really getting to be a worry, Stan. Back off on the little
girls for their sake. Ok?
--
Ray
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girls
The more you obsess over this, the bigger the archive of your
obsession grows, and grows and grows.
--
Ray
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girls
Oh, dear. Stan's the only one mentioning them. And with such
fondness, too.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
"Waaaah! Pleeeeese stop reminding everyone that I'm a repulsive piece of
shit who should *never* be allowed near little girls! Waaaaaaah!"
-- Ray "Repulsive Piece of Shit" Haddad
Worried about the archives, scum-boy? Tough. Sucks for you, doesn't it,
scum-boy?
--
Stan
Stan (the Man)
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:14 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>
>> Twist all you like, scum-boy, but you remain the repulsive piece of shit
>> who brags about having encouraged adults to bother a little girl who you
>> admitted you knew was too young for adults to bother. And, much as you'd
>> love to deny that, you can't run from the archives, scum-boy.
>
> This is really getting to be a worry, Stan. Back off on the little
> girls for their sake. Ok?
It's no surprise that all you can do in your desperation is resort to
dishonest snippage, scum-boy. Do you cry yourself to sleep over the fact
that you can't fool anyone, scum-boy? Big, wet tears of frustration? Of
course you do. And the best part is it's all your own doing. All I need do
is remind everyone. You try and you try to turn it around, but you never
succeed because everyone here knows what you are, scum-boy: A repulsive
piece of shit who should *never* be allowed near little girls. And I'm
going to continue ensuring that no one ever forgets that.
--
Stan
Stan (the Man)
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:19:41 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>
>> No, scum-boy. I'll just continue to inform and remind everyone about
>> what a repulsive piece of shit you are and how you should *never* be
>> allowed near little girls. Sucks for you, eh, scum-boy?
>
> Oh, dear. Stan's the only one mentioning them.
Except for all the others who keep mentioning what a repulsive piece of
shit you are, scum-boy. Doesn't that just have you seething? Of course it
does.
And with such
> fondness, too.
That's why I intend to make sure no one ever forgets that you should
*never* be allowed near little girls, scum-boy. Sucks for you, doesn't it?
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>It's no surprise that all you can do in your desperation is resort to
>dishonest snippage, scum-boy.
Look familiar to you, Stan?
--
Ray
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girls!
Ooh, an exclamation point added! You must be at that time of the
month, eh Stan? I really wish you'd try to curb your obsession. For
the sake of the children, Stan. Think of the children.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
What looks familiar is the fact that you continue to be the most despised,
disgusting, nauseating and repulsive poster in the ng.
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>little girls
Nuff said. Stan's just plain slime any more. Sad that a police
office has come to this.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:50:58 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>
>> "Waaaah! Pleeeeese stop reminding everyone that I'm a repulsive piece of
>> shit who should *never* be allowed near little girls! Waaaaaaah!"
>> -- Ray "Repulsive Piece of Shit" Haddad
>
>> Worried about the archives, scum-boy? Tough. Sucks for you, doesn't it,
>> scum-boy?
>
> Ooh, an exclamation point added! You must be at that time of the
> month, eh Stan?
Did you think everyone forgot that you're also an ugly misogynist, scum-
boy. Not to worry. It's just one reason why virtually every woman who
participates in the ng finds you so utterly repulsive.
> I really wish you'd try to curb your obsession.
Of course you do. But, I'll just continue to remind everyone of the fact
that you're a repulsive piece of shit who should *never* be allowed near
little girls.
> For the sake of the children, Stan. Think of the children.
Exactly.
--
Stan
Stan (the Man)
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:55:40 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>> Except for all the others who keep mentioning what a repulsive piece of
>> shit you are, scum-boy. Doesn't that just have you seething? Of course
>> it does.
>>> And with such fondness, too.
>> That's why I intend to make sure no one ever forgets that you should
>> *never* be allowed near little girls, scum-boy. Sucks for you, doesn't
>> it?
> Nuff said.
'Fraid not, scum-boy. I'll just keep saying it and saying it and saying it.
> Stan's just plain slime any more. Sad that a police
> office has come to this.
Sucks for you, doesn't it, scum-boy?
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>news:gufv745f4gclprama...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:50:58 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>>
>>> "Waaaah! Pleeeeese stop reminding everyone that I'm a repulsive piece of
>>> shit who should *never* be allowed near little girls! Waaaaaaah!"
>>> -- Ray "Repulsive Piece of Shit" Haddad
>>
>>> Worried about the archives, scum-boy? Tough. Sucks for you, doesn't it,
>>> scum-boy?
>>
>> Ooh, an exclamation point added! You must be at that time of the
>> month, eh Stan?
>
>Did you think everyone forgot that you're also an ugly misogynist, scum-
>boy. Not to worry. It's just one reason why virtually every woman who
>participates in the ng finds you so utterly repulsive.
Discussing your time of the month for a compulsion for little girls
is misogynistic in what way? See how your mind works, Stan? You made
up facts not in evidence in the past and you just did it again.
>> I really wish you'd try to curb your obsession.
>
>Of course you do. But, I'll just continue to remind everyone of the fact
>that you're a repulsive piece of shit who should *never* be allowed near
>little girls.
Your obsession with little girls is just getting sicker and sicker,
Stan. And you being a police officer, too. Shame.
>> For the sake of the children, Stan. Think of the children.
>
>Exactly.
Then get some help for the sake of the children, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:03:49 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>
>>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>>news:gufv745f4gclprama...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:50:58 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>>> and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>>>
>>>> "Waaaah! Pleeeeese stop reminding everyone that I'm a repulsive
>>>> piece of shit who should *never* be allowed near little girls!
>>>> Waaaaaaah!" -- Ray "Repulsive Piece of Shit" Haddad
>>>
>>>> Worried about the archives, scum-boy? Tough. Sucks for you, doesn't
>>>> it, scum-boy?
>>>
>>> Ooh, an exclamation point added! You must be at that time of the
>>> month, eh Stan?
>>
>>Did you think everyone forgot that you're also an ugly misogynist,
>>scum- boy. Not to worry. It's just one reason why virtually every
>>woman who participates in the ng finds you so utterly repulsive.
>
> Discussing your time of the month for a compulsion for little girls
> is misogynistic in what way? See how your mind works, Stan? You made
> up facts not in evidence in the past and you just did it again.
No one here buys your idiotic word games, either. You can't run from the
archives, scum-boy. They're not your friend. Which reminds me . . . you
forgot to attempt to deny this:
You remain the repulsive piece of shit who brags about having encouraged
adults to bother a little girl who you admitted you knew was too young
for adults to bother.
You just can't run from that one, can you, scum-boy?
>>> I really wish you'd try to curb your obsession.
>>
>>Of course you do. But, I'll just continue to remind everyone of the
>>fact that you're a repulsive piece of shit who should *never* be
>>allowed near little girls.
>
> Your obsession with little girls is just getting sicker and sicker,
> Stan. And you being a police officer, too. Shame.
Protecting little girls from a repulsive piece of shit like you is quite
the healthy obsession, scum-boy. I plan to continue.
>>> For the sake of the children, Stan. Think of the children.
>>
>>Exactly.
>
> Then get some help for the sake of the children, Stan.
I'll just continue to do my bit to protect them from you, scum-boy. And
all your twisting and attempts to turn it around and your dishonest
snippages and any other absurd tactics you might try won't help you one
bit. You'll always be the repulsive piece of shit who should *never* be
allowed near little girls.
--
Stan
gekko
the hostage, phoned Mom on her birthday and then posted to
misc.writing:
> Yup, even when he *thinks* he's got people stumped he blows it.
>
> In Australian slang, a *person* is not referred to as "a pork
> chop".
>
> The local slang expression is: "To carry on like a pork chop",
> which means "to behave foolishly".
>
> So who's carrying on like a pork chop
> here, then?
>
> Right, you guessed it.
>
> A clear case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.
>
> Bernie.
>
I first heard (and continue to hear) the term in the US used as Ray
used it and to indicate a stupid person.
So I went to verify it and found it can also be slang for a police
helicopter, a person of Portuguese descent, or this collection:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?page=2&term=pork+chop
#11 on that second page says "a typical Aussie bloke"
Granted, these are submissions by pretty much anyone who wants to add
a definition, but they are telling people how *they* understand it to
be used, aka, how it is shifting within common dialect.
Answers.yahoo.com has a good explanation for Bernie's understanding
and that can lead one to a shift in meaning from "like a pork chop"
to just "a pork chop" to be shorthand to indicate the same thing.
Inappropriate, silly, stupid, wrong ...
--
gekko
A user interface isn't done until there's nothing left to remove. --
Will Wright, 1960 to ?, designer of SimCity, SimAnt, and The Sims.
Ray Haddad
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsN...@rvckids.us.NOSPAM> instead replied:
>You remain the repulsive piece of shit who brags about having encouraged
>adults to bother a little girl who you admitted you knew was too young
>for adults to bother.
>
>You just can't run from that one, can you, scum-boy?
Why don't you get the entire message and quote it here, idiot. Even
your pea brain might be able to figure out why that was done. I
don't hold much hope for you, though. You're just far too dim.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
No problem, scum-boy. Happy to oblige. Here's what you believe is
appropriate behavior toward a little girl, you repulsive piece of shit:
"One other tip for you. There was a young lady who is a former
student of mine at Hale School. She used the hotmail account
of Rubber_Band_...@hotmail.com. Why don't you ask her for my
details. She's 15 now and nearly old enough for you to bother.
She came here once and Eric slammed her for using the same
ISP that I use. That heroic deed chased her from USENET
forever but you don't care about that, do you?"
-- Ray Haddad, Jan 3 2002 alt.magic.secrets
Subject Line: "Re: Just as I thought, Ray...
you're full of crap!"
You can twist all you want, scum-boy, but as I said, you can't run from
the archives. Your stench will always be right there for the world to
see. You're repulsive, scum-boy, a repulsive piece of shit who should
Ray Haddad
The whole message, Stan. Not just that bit. Try and stay focused. I
realize that you're dimmer than the average guy here but give it
another try. Then, go and read every message on the subject. Pretend
you're a real police officer investigating instead of using Sylvia's
nonsense analysis of things.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
If you think the whole message or thread will somehow vindicate you, go
ahead and post it. It doesn't and it won't, scum-boy. Your own words
condemn you. You're a repulsive piece of shit who should *never* be
allowed near little girls. The above cite demonstrates that quite
clearly.
--
Stan
Sylvia
> "Stan (the Man)" wrote
> > Sylvia wrote:
> >> Mr. LN wrote:
> >>> Ray Haddad wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > I typed one word and look what you did to it. Man, you are one hate
> >>> > filled copper. And, still obsessed with little girls, too. Still
> >>> > making false accusations. Still being a real pork chop. I can see
> >>> > that even as you deny it, you are very, very interested in both me
> >>> > and your little girl fantasies. Hehehe. Good one, Stan. Nobody
> >>> > mentions little girls any more. Except for you.
> >>>
> >>> This is what you get when you take a plagiarized script copied and
> >>> pasted by Lloyd Press and deliver it in a cartoon Cagney voice.
> >>>
> >>> Suggestions for improvement: --work in the phrase "you dirty rat"
> >>> --punctuate with the word "see?" --refer to yourself in the third
> >>> person --include some "yeah, that's right"
> >>>
> >>> Result: You dirty rat, Ray typed one word and look what you did to it.
> >>> Man, you are one hate filled copper, see? And, still obsessed with
> >>> little girls, too. Yeah, that's right, still making false accusations,
> >>> see? Still being a real pork chop, see? Haddad can see that even as you
> >>> deny it, you are very, very interested in both me and your little girl
> >>> fantasies. Hehehe. Nobody mentions little girls any more, yeah, that's
> >>> right. Except for you, see?
> >>>
> >>> Now, work in front of a mirror, Haddad, until you've got this one down
> >>> as pat as your French drop. That took you a decade; you don't have that
> >>> much time to get this one ready.
> >>
> >> "A pork chop"? WTF does Haddad mean?
> >
> > He hasn't a clue. He just tosses out words, desperately hoping to sound
> > clever, desperately hoping one will score him even a minor point. In the
> > end, he remains a repulsive piece of shit. Try as he might, he just can't
> > get away from that fact.
> >
> > -- Stan
>
> Yup, even when he *thinks* he's got people stumped he blows it.
>
> In Australian slang, a *person* is not referred to as "a pork chop".
>
> The local slang expression is: "To carry on like a pork chop", which means
> "to behave foolishly".
>
> So who's carrying on like a pork chop here, then?
The Idiot Ray Haddad!
> Right, you guessed it.
<beaming>
It was a given.
> A clear case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.
Ray Haddad: "So did I. In fact, my defensiveness is down to that
very fact. Nobody cares that Stan and Robert act
like absolute raving pork chops under most
circumstances."
gekko: " 'absolute raving pork chops'?
"I hope Ray doesn't consider himself a creative writer."
Ray Haddad: "It's local color, Gekko. Common usage down under. I
don't expect Stan to get it. That's why it's so much
fun to use it.
gekko: "Raving pork chops, Ray. C'mon."
Josh Hill: "As opposed to what, 'You've worked hard at being
the most repugnant piece of garbage in the ng. You've
earned every ounce of abuse that's been heaped on
you and will continue to be heaped on you. Wallow in
it, scum.' ?"
gekko: " 'absolute raving pork chops', Josh. ARPC. I mean, hello."
Ray Haddad: "The term is 'acting like a pork chop' or similar usage."
"It emphasizes the two pork chop's behavior here. And, it
keeps the comment in mind each time you repeat it. What
else can a writer want in life?"
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Nov 2007
"Your bragging here must have given you the courage to
enter another, private place, and carry on like a pork chop.
It got you your due. Bravo, Robert."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Feb 2003
FOITN:
Idiot Haddad: "You seem to forget when you do things that others
often remember them.
"Now, about all those times YOU acted like a pork chop?"
Mr. Hope: "Acted like a what?"
Idiot Haddad: "I can begin a litany of those but can't be bothered. Y
our next few posts will do just fine."
Mr. Hope: "You been drinking?"
Miz Ultraviolet: "Some folks love ham hocks
And some folks love pork chops
And some folks love vegetable soup
But Haddad the hearty
Loves a good gossip party
And that's why Al invented FROUPS"
Nov 7 2001:
Idiot Haddad: "Pat,
"I'm not the only one who says you breach netiquette.
Others do but you choose to ignore them and focus
on me, your hero.
"You forget that those who REALLY don't like you
have you on their killfile list and the only ones who
can see you acting like a pork chop are those who
still choose to read your foul language and
nonsensical posts.
"Trust me, you haven't got any more fans or a class
left to preach to, Pat. They all listened to me and
have you in their killfile. Don't you just hate it
when that happens?
ANcientMagician: "Ray trying to score points with some 10 year old in
the audience by preaching what Ray Himself
likes to hear.
" 'What A Great Powerful Man Ray Haddad Is!!!!' "
"This is precisely why Pat should post his 850 line Silly FUQ
on a web page and use a URL to point to it. That would be acting
like a good USENET user instead of a pork chop."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Aug 30 2001
"You have continued to show your callous disregard for societal
evolution by acting like a pork chop."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Aug 29 2001
"You've lost your very last supporter. You are acting like a
pork chop [...] All you are now capable of posting is things
about me, your greatest hero in life. You try hard to imitate
me but your filthy language gives you away."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Aug 21 2001
FOITN:
"The sad part is that you can't even see that what you're doing
is antisocial. You think it's your responsibility to yell and holler
and carry on like a pork chop."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Nov 15 2001
Dec 11 2005:
Idiot Haddad: "Measure of the man, Alan. Never forget that.
Mr. Hope: "Yes. You were ignorant, and I was in possession
of the facts.
Idiot Haddad: "Once more, you display your utter lack of
knowledge on a subject. It's you who are a
pork chop at the moment."
Jan 25 2008:
Mr. Greg: "I'm not in the least confused. If you don't specify
then I have to assume you're talking in terms of
the measurements I know you use.
Idiot Haddad: "You're so confused that you confused half a dozen
others here, Greg. And for the record, I use all
manner of measurements. When someone states they
are using a gallon of something, I know what that
amount is. I don't need to go spinning around like
a top 'a la Greg Procter' just to try and make a
point. When you wrote '1 litre' I knew you meant
1000ml, or 1 liter without having make a pork chop
of myself pretending that you were wrong just for
using a term."
Oct 26 2007
Mr. Johnson: "Quit arguing that acting like a terminal newbie is a
Good Thing when it's well established that it's not."
Idiot Haddad: "There's nothing you can do about top posting. Give it
up and resume discussing trains. Or, continue to
act like a pork chop and do your best to try to get
me to stop . . . (see above) [refers toHaddad's
top posting]"
May 23 2007 (IKYABWAI by proxy):
Idiot Haddad: "Josh is wiping the floor with his great drooling tongue
that he does not seem to know how to reel back in."
gekko "Fuck sake. Do you *really* take Usenet so seriously
that you imagine 'winners' and 'losers'?"
Idiot Haddad: "No, but I do take great joy in watching Stan view it that
way. Why else would he behave like such a pork chop?"
"You acted like a pork chop. Then you turned me down. Your loss."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Apr 16 2007
"Now, tell me how I conform to your image of the perfect MW
poster. Oh, by the way. When you become one yourself, it would
go a long way towards any reply from you being useful information.
[...] gives you a free pass for acting like a pork chop now."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Mar 8 2007
Apr 29 2006 :
Idiot Haddad: "Even when I try to make light of a situation,
you act like a pork chop."
Miz Marg: "Make light of a situation? You started the *situation*
with your insults. Look to yourself, bozo.
"It's you who are a pork chop at the moment. Just let this
sub-thread die before you make an even bigger fool of yourself
than you normally are."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad Dec 12 2005
"You lost, Dumbo. You threw in the towel. You conceded that your
betters were getting the better of you. You acted like a pork chop
and cried about being mistreated. To sum this up, you squawked and
cawed and announced that Stan, Gekko and I are now in your kill file."
-- The Idiot Ray Haddad to his pal, Josh Hill
Aug 14 2005
July 2008:
Idiot Haddad: "Still being a real pork chop. [...]"
Miz Sylvia: "A pork chop"? WTF does Haddad mean?"
[...]
Miz Bernie: " The local slang expression is:
'To carry on like a pork chop' "
--
Sylvia
Sylvia
gekko <ge...@lutz.kicks-ass.org.INVALID> wrote:
> "Bernie" wrote:
<UNsnip!>
> > Sylvia wrote:
> >> The Idiot Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote:
.
> >> > Now, work in front of a mirror, Haddad, until you've got this one down
> >> > as pat as your French drop. That took you a decade; you don't have
> >> > that much time to get this one ready.
.
> >> "A pork chop"? WTF does Haddad mean?
</UNsnip!>
> > Yup, even when he *thinks* he's got people stumped he blows it.
> >
> > In Australian slang, a *person* is not referred to as "a pork
> > chop".
> >
> > The local slang expression is: "To carry on like a pork chop",
> > which means "to behave foolishly".
> >
> > So who's carrying on like a pork chop
> > here, then?
> >
> > Right, you guessed it.
> >
> > A clear case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.
> I first heard (and continue to hear) the term in the US used as Ray
> used it and to indicate a stupid person.
<...>
Nov 17 2007:
Ray Haddad: "So did I. In fact, my defensiveness is down to that
very fact. Nobody cares that Stan and Robert act
like absolute raving pork chops under most
circumstances."
gekko: " 'absolute raving pork chops'? "
"I hope Ray doesn't consider himself a creative writer."
Ray Haddad: "It's local color, Gekko. Common usage down under. I
don't expect Stan to get it. That's why it's so much
fun to use it."
gekko: "Raving pork chops, Ray. C'mon."
Josh Hill: "As opposed to what, 'You've worked hard at being
the most repugnant piece of garbage in the ng. You've
earned every ounce of abuse that's been heaped on
you and will continue to be heaped on you. Wallow in
it, scum.' ?"
gekko: " 'absolute raving pork chops', Josh. ARPC. I mean, hello."
--
Sylvia
gekko
rescued the hostage, phoned Mom on her birthday and then posted to
misc.writing:
What's yer point.
Ray Haddad
I can take your two words, "little girls," and when they are
selected from context and cited alone paint an entirely different
picture than you attempt to paint. Which of course, is your
intention. You work very hard at painting a picture of me that just
isn't true. And then you believe you can whitewash your libelous
accusations because you've convinced yourself that you're justified
in doing what you do. You're a police officer, Stan. Act like one
instead of acting like Sylvia's lapdog.
--
Ray
John Ashby
"Ray Haddad" <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in message
news:5dlv74hph7v0bt4n9...@4ax.com...
Done and dusted. Once again you wheeled out this alleged former student when
you were engaged in a Usenet argument, inciting in particular one poster
whom you were accusing of (incompetent) stalking to contact her, but, inter
alia giving her details out to all and sundry.
To find the original message I put the phrase "She's 15 now and nearly old
enough for you to bother" into Google. The results of that search support
the contention of many here that it indicates a dangerous mindset.
john
boots
Your search - "She's 15 now and nearly old enough for you to bother"
- did not match any documents.
google-groups' exact-phrase searching apparently sucks.
Same string entered as separate keywords? Results 1 - 10 of about
294,000 The first 3 hits are from misc.writing. None in the first
two pages appear to be the original post.
And people here use that thing to judge and convict others, go figure.
*That* indicates a dangerous mindset.
Now I anticipate a rash of posts denouncing me as an idiot incapable
of using google groups, that's on a par with the rest of the mindset.
I don't like little girls like Gretel, who murdered an innocent old
woman then told tales of her being a wicked witch; history written by
the victors innit. History is after all nothing but things past, and
although stock traders learn early on that "past results are not
indicative of future performance" a felon *rehabilitated* is doomed to
the life of a felon, "have you ever been convicted of" being part of
every employment application. Justice is not only blind, it is deaf
and dumb.
--
Don't read this crap... oops, too late!
[superstitious heathen grade 8]
Ray Haddad
and "John Ashby" <johna...@yahoo.com> instead replied:
>Done and dusted. Once again you wheeled out this alleged former student when
>you were engaged in a Usenet argument, inciting in particular one poster
>whom you were accusing of (incompetent) stalking to contact her, but, inter
>alia giving her details out to all and sundry.
Excuse me, but did you read the entire exchange or are you going to
go on just the one snip?
>To find the original message I put the phrase "She's 15 now and nearly old
>enough for you to bother" into Google. The results of that search support
>the contention of many here that it indicates a dangerous mindset.
You limit yourself, John. Too bad for you.
--
Ray
Bernie
"gekko" <ge...@lutz.kicks-ass.org.INVALID> wrote in message
news:Xns9ADE9F268...@217.68.187.32...
> "Bernie" <rain...@westnet.com.au> fought off the bad guys,
> rescued
> the hostage, phoned Mom on her birthday and then posted to
> misc.writing:
>
>
>> Yup, even when he *thinks* he's got people stumped he blows
>> it.
>>
>> In Australian slang, a *person* is not referred to as "a pork
>> chop".
>>
>> The local slang expression is: "To carry on like a pork chop",
>> which means "to behave foolishly".
>>
>> So who's carrying on like a pork chop
>> here, then?
>>
>> Right, you guessed it.
>>
>> A clear case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.
>>
>> Bernie.
>>
>
> I first heard (and continue to hear) the term in the US used as
> Ray
> used it and to indicate a stupid person.
>
> So I went to verify it and found it can also be slang for a
> police
> helicopter, a person of Portuguese descent, or this collection:
>
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?page=2&term=pork+chop
Mmm -- maybe he's getting them a bit mixed up?
>
> #11 on that second page says "a typical Aussie bloke"
Now *that* looks as though it might have been entered by Ray
himself.
> Granted, these are submissions by pretty much anyone who wants
> to add
> a definition, but they are telling people how *they* understand
> it to
> be used, aka, how it is shifting within common dialect.
>
> Answers.yahoo.com has a good explanation for Bernie's
> understanding
> and that can lead one to a shift in meaning from "like a pork
> chop"
> to just "a pork chop" to be shorthand to indicate the same
> thing.
>
> Inappropriate, silly, stupid, wrong ...
Which is what Ray appears to have done.
Thanks for the input, gekko.
Bernie.
Stan (the Man)
Yes, scum-boy, everyone here knows exactly what you do:
"Yet I don't libel you more then I need to in order to
make it clear you are lying."
-- Ray "King of the Domain of the Sick" Haddad
Which of course, is your
> intention. You work very hard at painting a picture of me that just
> isn't true. And then you believe you can whitewash your libelous
> accusations because you've convinced yourself that you're justified
> in doing what you do. You're a police officer, Stan. Act like one
> instead of acting like Sylvia's lapdog.
IOW, posting the whole message or thread will, of course, do nothing to
change the meaning of what you've written. No one need work hard at all
to paint you as anything other than exactly what you are. No, scum-boy,
everything I and others have said about you is fully supported by your
own disgusting words. They condemn you. They will continue to condemn
you. As I've said, you can't run from your stench in the archives,
scum-boy. The fact remains that you are a repulsive piece of shit who
should *never* be allowed near little girls.
--
Stan
Alan Hope
If only you would all just take the trouble to find out everything, you'd understand that it was a very pure thing, and besides she wanted it more than Ray did. But no, you all want to go rushing off to judgement on the facts alone.
--
AH
Sylvia
> "Ray Haddad" <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote
> > "Stan (the Man)" wrote:
> >>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote
FTR, the guy Ray Haddad was attacking didn't stalk anyone, he, Eric, is *one*
of Haddad's stalking RL victims. Eric is also the peep who spotted that Ray
Haddad was using a sock puppet to make himself look bigger during his attack
on Eric.
--
Sylvia
gekko
@westnet.com.au> had the nerve to say in message
news:KbadndxDx4I...@westnet.com.au...
> Thanks for the input, gekko.
welcome.
--
gekko
I have gone to go look for myself. If I should come back before I
return, please point me in the direction I was heading when you last
saw me...