Thinking of changing my usnet "handle"
Rookie with 676 weeks
Rookie with 12 weeks
>what do you'all think of my new name?
I love it, but where in the hell did you think of that? ;-)
Brian Smith
"Rookie with 676 weeks" <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
news:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com...
> what do you'all think of my new name?
Rather long, isn't it?
Cityofnyny
>news:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com...
>> what do you'all think of my new name?
you mean "richard with 676 weeks"
"Richard" and "Rookie with 12 weeks" appear to have the same IP/node using ARP.
Rookie with 12 weeks
<20031225164123...@mb-m06.aol.com>...
>>"Rookie with 676 weeks" <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
>>news:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com...
>>> what do you'all think of my new name?
>
>you mean "richard with 676 weeks"
>
>"Richard" and "Rookie with 12 weeks" appear to have the same IP/node using
ARP.
First, Merry Christmas to you, but it looks like you rate lower than Richard
on your information.
If you look at the 3 post in question, one from each of the posters you
mention, you will see they are from 3 different news servers.
supernews, att and newsguy.
On top of that Supernews does not put an IP address in their header, you
can't even mention that part.
Me, I plan to give up the name Rookie in 26 weeks instead of waiting a full
year. After 6 months I'm going to try and get on with a local company and
I'm just using my handle as a counter while I am waiting.
thanx.
Rookie with 676 weeks
> How about "Rookie with no brains, no training, no truck".
>
>
WOW!!!! This means a lot from you.
Rookie with 676 weeks
>>"Rookie with 676 weeks" <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
>>news:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>>what do you'all think of my new name?
>
>
> you mean "richard with 676 weeks"
>
> "Richard" and "Rookie with 12 weeks" appear to have the same IP/node using ARP.
>
Richard????? What an insult.
Rookie with 12 weeks
>Learn to read headers. They are quite different.
>I use newsguy, he uses att.net.
>His headers show an IP, mine do not.
>Now the question is, is that IP that of the poster or of the news service?
Richard,
Here is the header in question. My question follows.
Path:
bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net!wnmast
er11!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!216.166.71.14!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!
small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!headwall.st
anford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!sn-xit-02!
sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Rookie with 676 weeks <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca>
Newsgroups: misc.transport.trucking
Subject: Thinking of changing my usnet "handle"
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 13:15:23 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5)
Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: ab...@supernews.com
Lines: 2
Xref: wnmaster11 misc.transport.trucking:182059
X-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:16:07 GMT
(bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net)
I have never seen them place a IP address of the poster in the Path before.
Are you sure you know what you are talking about?
I still think that "Supernews" does not put the IP address of the poster in
the header.
realitytrucker
> what do you'all think of my new name?
If you close that little laptop and put it away and devote the time
you spend trolling newsgroups, thinking up user names, and defending
morons like Bullis to actually driving a truck and learning the trade
you might become a decent truck driver
Rocky
"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.03123...@posting.google.com...
Two issues here, that I wish we could have dealt with before you and Dave
Ruff would try to burn m.t.t. down to the ground.
1. Where is the post that makes you think "defending morons like Bullis?"
Was it the one where Dave Ruff gave me crap for an opinion? I think so.
2. With the screen names I have used up to this point, below, what makes
you think I would be using "676 weeks" of experience, when all I had was 12
weeks.
I respect drivers with more time than I have and because of your false
assumption you would continue to be an asshole to the present day. (meaning
your above post was on December 30, 2003)
Once again, the names I used up to the day you would falsely accuse me of
posting as if I had "676 weeks" of experience.
08/30/2003 "Still in School"
09/11/2003 "Still in School" But I was now Still in School with CDL.
09/22/2003 "Still in School with CDL"
09/26/2003 "Still in School not" Posted "Graduated Today" Duh.
12/07/2003 "Was in School OTR for 2 months" From 10/06/2003
If the following weeks are not perfect. I was adding days off to the total
before I'd get in the truck again.
12/07/2003 "Rookie for 2 months now"
12/13/2003 "Rookie that has lasted 10 weeks"
12/13/2003 "Rookie after 10 weeks"
12/15/2003 "Rookie with 10.3 weeks"
12/24/2003 "Rookie with 12 weeks"
Now I expect an apology for the entire group, since all you did was turn
into SUPER TROLL not too long after your above post.
Rocky
Two issues here, that I wish we could have dealt with before you and Dave
Ruff would try to burn m.t.t. down to the ground with pure unadulterated
flamebait.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamebait
1. One of the pieces of "Flamebait" that you used above was recanted by
Dave Ruff. He has since stated: "No one should do that and I agree."
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.trucking/msg/10ae016b28ff8662
In other words, your "defending morons like Bullis" was based on a "False
statement" or "Flamebait" that Dave Ruff used just 2 weeks before you would
add more flamebait to Dave Ruff's flamebait.
2. With the screen names I have used up to this point, below, what makes
you think I would be using "676 weeks" of experience, when all I had was 12
weeks.
I respect drivers with more time than I have and because of your false
assumption you would continue to be an asshole to the present day. (meaning
your above post was on December 30, 2003)
Once again, the names I used up to the day you would falsely accuse me of
posting as if I had "676 weeks" of experience.
08/30/2003 "Still in School"
09/11/2003 "Still in School" But I was now Still in School with CDL.
09/22/2003 "Still in School with CDL"
09/26/2003 "Still in School not" Posted "Graduated Today" Duh.
12/07/2003 "Was in School OTR for 2 months" From 10/06/2003
If the following weeks are not perfect. I was adding days off to the total
before I'd get in the truck again.
12/07/2003 "Rookie for 2 months now"
12/13/2003 "Rookie that has lasted 10 weeks"
12/13/2003 "Rookie after 10 weeks"
12/15/2003 "Rookie with 10.3 weeks"
12/24/2003 "Rookie with 12 weeks"
You had no right jumping to the false assumptions you made.
But that isn't all, things would go even worse after you added to Dave
Ruff's flamebait.
----------------------------------------
One of the other post on this thread was total flamebait. It was a post by
a one time poster, saying you could use ARP (Address Resolution Protocol)
with post that did not have IP addresses in them.
In other words, it was also a false statement or flamebait and after that
Troll postered, Trolls would start to think I was Richard.
Then you would use that "Flamebait" in your most explosive "Flamebait" post
to date. Your flamebait post of March 25, 2004 when you would try to say
that I was Richard.
Shortly after your March 25, 2004 flamebait, Zčke would chime in and add
first degree "Flamebait" by posting with my name and E-mail address. More
on Jeff at: http://MTT.SlimeFest.com/Zeke
Tim, you are proof that "Flamebait" works with Trolls. You use "Flamebait"
all the freak'n time and then you try to act innocent of any wrong doing.
Typical Troll you are.
Now I expect an apology for the entire group, since all you did was turn
into SUPER TROLL not too long after your above post and it was on March 25,
2004 to be exact.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
realitytrucker
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8a7d8469.03123...@posting.google.com...> Rookie with 676 weeks <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
>
> <news:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com>...
>
> > > what do you'all think of my new name?
>
> > If you close that little laptop and put it away and devote the time
> > you spend trolling newsgroups, thinking up user names, and defending
> > morons like Bullis to actually driving a truck and learning the trade
> > you might become a decent truck driver
>
> Two issues here, that I wish we could have dealt with before you and Dave
> Ruff would try to burn m.t.t. down to the ground with pure unadulterated
> flamebait.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamebait
It's history, loser, all in the past. Try living in the present for a
change.
>
> 1. One of the pieces of "Flamebait" that you used above was recanted by
> Dave Ruff. He has since stated: "No one should do that and I agree."http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.trucking/msg/10ae016b28...
>
> In other words, your "defending morons like Bullis" was based on a "False
> statement" or "Flamebait" that Dave Ruff used just 2 weeks before you would
> add more flamebait to Dave Ruff's flamebait.
Nope. You were defending Bullis. Bullis is a pedophile and you
didn't seem to find anything wrong with that.,
>
> 2. With the screen names I have used up to this point, below, what makes
> you think I would be using "676 weeks" of experience, when all I had was 12
> weeks.
How about all the screennames you used to get around killfilters just
to troll and annoy people?
>
> I respect drivers with more time than I have and because of your false
> assumption you would continue to be an asshole to the present day. (meaning
> your above post was on December 30, 2003)
No one has more time than you have.
>
> Once again, the names I used up to the day you would falsely accuse me of
> posting as if I had "676 weeks" of experience.
>
> 08/30/2003 "Still in School"
> 09/11/2003 "Still in School" But I was now Still in School with CDL.
> 09/22/2003 "Still in School with CDL"
> 09/26/2003 "Still in School not" Posted "Graduated Today" Duh.
> 12/07/2003 "Was in School OTR for 2 months" From 10/06/2003
>
> If the following weeks are not perfect. I was adding days off to the total
> before I'd get in the truck again.
>
> 12/07/2003 "Rookie for 2 months now"
> 12/13/2003 "Rookie that has lasted 10 weeks"
> 12/13/2003 "Rookie after 10 weeks"
> 12/15/2003 "Rookie with 10.3 weeks"
> 12/24/2003 "Rookie with 12 weeks"
>
> You had no right jumping to the false assumptions you made.
And you have no right being alive.
>
> But that isn't all, things would go even worse after you added to Dave
> Ruff's flamebait.
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> One of the other post on this thread was total flamebait. It was a post by
> a one time poster, saying you could use ARP (Address Resolution Protocol)
> with post that did not have IP addresses in them.
>
> In other words, it was also a false statement or flamebait and after that
> Troll postered, Trolls would start to think I was Richard.
>
> Then you would use that "Flamebait" in your most explosive "Flamebait" post
> to date. Your flamebait post of March 25, 2004 when you would try to say
> that I was Richard.
>
> Shortly after your March 25, 2004 flamebait, Zèke would chime in and add
> first degree "Flamebait" by posting with my name and E-mail address. More
> on Jeff at:http://MTT.SlimeFest.com/Zeke
>
> Tim, you are proof that "Flamebait" works with Trolls. You use "Flamebait"
> all the freak'n time and then you try to act innocent of any wrong doing.
> Typical Troll you are.
>
> Now I expect an apology for the entire group, since all you did was turn
> into SUPER TROLL not too long after your above post and it was on March 25,
> 2004 to be exact.
>
> Rocky -http://wookiee.home.att.net
Who cares?? it's all history. I realized along time ago you weren't
Bullis. Bullis is a fucking Einstein compared to you and he's dumber
than a rock!
No one cares! No one cares that you don't have a CDL except you who
keeps trying to convince everyone that you do.
Rocky
"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.03123...@posting.google.com...
> Rookie with 676 weeks <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
news:<vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com>...
> > what do you'all think of my new name?
>
> If you close that little laptop and put it away and devote the time
> you spend trolling newsgroups, thinking up user names, and defending
> morons like Bullis to actually driving a truck and learning the trade
> you might become a decent truck driver
Two issues here, that I wish we could have dealt with before you and Dave
Ruff would try to burn m.t.t. down to the ground with pure unadulterated
flamebait.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamebait
1. One of the pieces of "Flamebait" that you used above was recanted by
Dave Ruff. He has since stated: "No one should do that and I agree."
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.trucking/msg/10ae016b28ff8662
In other words, your "defending morons like Bullis" was based on a "False
statement" or "Flamebait" that Dave Ruff used just 2 weeks before you would
add more flamebait to Dave Ruff's flamebait.
2. With the screen names I have used up to this point, below, what makes
you think I would be using "676 weeks" of experience, when all I had was 12
weeks.
I respect drivers with more time than I have and because of your false
assumption you would continue to be an asshole to the present day. (meaning
your above post was on December 30, 2003)
Once again, the names I used up to the day you would falsely accuse me of
posting as if I had "676 weeks" of experience.
08/30/2003 "Still in School"
09/11/2003 "Still in School" But I was now Still in School with CDL.
09/22/2003 "Still in School with CDL"
09/26/2003 "Still in School not" Posted "Graduated Today" Duh.
12/07/2003 "Was in School OTR for 2 months" From 10/06/2003
If the following weeks are not perfect. I was adding days off to the total
before I'd get in the truck again.
12/07/2003 "Rookie for 2 months now"
12/13/2003 "Rookie that has lasted 10 weeks"
12/13/2003 "Rookie after 10 weeks"
12/15/2003 "Rookie with 10.3 weeks"
12/24/2003 "Rookie with 12 weeks"
You had no right jumping to the false assumptions you made.
But that isn't all, things would go even worse after you added to Dave
Ruff's flamebait.
----------------------------------------
One of the other post on this thread was total flamebait. It was a post by
a one time poster, saying you could use ARP (Address Resolution Protocol)
with post that did not have IP addresses in them.
In other words, it was also a false statement or flamebait and after that
Troll posted, Trolls would start to think I was Richard.
Then you would use that "Flamebait" in your most explosive "Flamebait" post
to date. Your flamebait post of March 25, 2004 when you would try to say
that I was Richard.
Shortly after your March 25, 2004 flamebait, Zčke would chime in and add
realitytrucker
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8a7d8469.03123...@posting.google.com...> Rookie with 676 weeks <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
>
> <news:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com>...
>
> > > what do you'all think of my new name?
>
> > If you close that little laptop and put it away and devote the time
> > you spend trolling newsgroups, thinking up user names, and defending
> > morons like Bullis to actually driving a truck and learning the trade
> > you might become a decent truck driver
>
> Two issues here, that I wish we could have dealt with before you and Dave
> Ruff would try to burn m.t.t. down to the ground with pure unadulterated
>
> 1. One of the pieces of "Flamebait" that you used above was recanted by
> first degree "Flamebait" by posting with my name and E-mail address. More
> on Jeff at:http://MTT.SlimeFest.com/Zeke
>
> Tim, you are proof that "Flamebait" works with Trolls. You use "Flamebait"
> all the freak'n time and then you try to act innocent of any wrong doing.
> Typical Troll you are.
>
> Now I expect an apology for the entire group, since all you did was turn
> into SUPER TROLL not too long after your above post and it was on March 25,
> 2004 to be exact.
>
> Rocky -http://wookiee.home.att.net
You're trolling now by repetitious posting of nonsense.
Gashauler
"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177281382....@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
You're trolling now by repetitious posting of nonsense.
If you ignore him he cries and panics because no one is watching.
realitytrucker
>
> Now I expect an apology for the entire group, since all you did was turn
> into SUPER TROLL not too long after your above post and it was on March 25,
> 2004 to be exact.
>
Apology is on it's way. Please hold your breath and wait for it.
Rocky
"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177281382....@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Rocky
"Gashauler" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nbudnfMCYbd3eLbb...@comcast.com...
Obviously Dave Ruff is watching or he wouldn't have seen Tim's post and
known that he is watching.
Clearly a case of Stupid and Stupider or was that Dumb and Dumber?
Either way, if Dave Ruff ever wants to help end this "Holy War" it will show
but right now all he wants to do is feeds the Monster Troll.
Rocky
Talk about a Blast from the Past, we have moved this stupid "Holy War" back
to the exact same thread it was started on in December of 2003!
Oh ya, I'm holding my breath in my left hand and typing with my right. Now
how do I stop laughing?
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
Zeke
"Rocky" <woo...@att.net> wrote in message
news:krednfDMzd0V7rbb...@giganews.com...
>
>
> 08/30/2003 "Still in School"
> 09/11/2003 "Still in School" But I was now Still in School with CDL.
> 09/22/2003 "Still in School with CDL"
> 09/26/2003 "Still in School not" Posted "Graduated Today" Duh.
> 12/07/2003 "Was in School OTR for 2 months" From 10/06/2003
>
> If the following weeks are not perfect. I was adding days off to the
> total
> before I'd get in the truck again.
>
> 12/07/2003 "Rookie for 2 months now"
> 12/13/2003 "Rookie that has lasted 10 weeks"
> 12/13/2003 "Rookie after 10 weeks"
> 12/15/2003 "Rookie with 10.3 weeks"
> 12/24/2003 "Rookie with 12 weeks"
>
There you go again... "look at how many times I nymshifted for attention".
Too bad you couldn't understand then that nobody gave a shit about how many
days you had in school. Then you wonder why everyone started to despise
you. That was the root of your problem and you still cannot see it.
Rocky
"Zeke" <n...@freakin.way> wrote in message
news:462bf...@newsfeed.slurp.net...
First, since you were "Rookie with 676 weeks" back in December of 2003 what
does that make you today.....Rookie with 840 weeks?
Tim, meet the real "Rookie with 676 weeks" his name is Jeff.
Besides, it does not matter if people despised me then. All that matters is
now. Why should Tim keep posting false information and flamebait about me
especially since I've stuck to one name?
In other words, he made a big deal out of nothing and now he can't stop.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
realitytrucker
> "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Evidently stupidity makes you blind.
realitytrucker
> "Zeke" <n...@freakin.way> wrote in message
>
> news:462bf...@newsfeed.slurp.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >news:krednfDMzd0V7rbb...@giganews.com...
>
> > > 08/30/2003 "Still in School"
> > > 09/11/2003 "Still in School" But I was now Still in School with CDL.
> > > 09/22/2003 "Still in School with CDL"
> > > 09/26/2003 "Still in School not" Posted "Graduated Today" Duh.
> > > 12/07/2003 "Was in School OTR for 2 months" From 10/06/2003
>
> > > If the following weeks are not perfect. I was adding days off to the
> > > total
> > > before I'd get in the truck again.
>
> > > 12/07/2003 "Rookie for 2 months now"
> > > 12/13/2003 "Rookie that has lasted 10 weeks"
> > > 12/13/2003 "Rookie after 10 weeks"
> > > 12/15/2003 "Rookie with 10.3 weeks"
> > > 12/24/2003 "Rookie with 12 weeks"
>
> > There you go again... "look at how many times I nymshifted for attention".
> > Too bad you couldn't understand then that nobody gave a shit about how
> many
> > days you had in school. Then you wonder why everyone started to despise
> > you. That was the root of your problem and you still cannot see it.
>
> First, since you were "Rookie with 676 weeks" back in December of 2003 what
> does that make you today.....Rookie with 840 weeks?
>
> Tim, meet the real "Rookie with 676 weeks" his name is Jeff.
>
> Besides, it does not matter if people despised me then. All that matters is
> now.
Everyone despise you NOW as well, dumbass,
Why should Tim keep posting false information and flamebait about me
> especially since I've stuck to one name?
Because you're still a lying, crying, trolling, stalking wannabe,
thats why.
>
> In other words, he made a big deal out of nothing and now he can't stop.
>
> Rocky -http://whyseverybodyalwayspickingonme?.home.att.net- Hide quoted text -
Rocky
Well, lets see, you are lying, crying, trolling and you are flaming.
So why not stop it? If you stop, I won't have to post as much as I do.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
realitytrucker
>
> So why not stop it? If you stop, I won't have to post as much as I do.
>
> Rocky -http://why'severybodyalwayspickingonme?.home.att.net- Hide quoted text -
>
If you'd just leave and not come back none of us would.
Rocky
>
> If you'd just leave and not come back none of us would.
You have been filling this newsgroup with so much garbage about me and for
so long, there is no way you could stop doing that for years.
You have to start your stopping now.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
realitytrucker
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Just spreading the truth about you. Thats all.
Now, unlike you, I have to get up and go to work in the morning. I
know you'll post another response. You have to have the last word.
But I am tired of your childish games, loser.
Rocky
Why don't you just stop your bullshit?
If you are tired of me getting the last word then start to think of a
compromise.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
Rocky
Certainly emotions make you blind Tim, as you fill your green face with even
more flamebait.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamebait
Not to mention the other problem you have besides being a Troll.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
realitytrucker
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1177305006.0...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 23, 12:08 am, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
> > > "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:1177304249.3...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > If you'd just leave and not come back none of us would.
>
> > > You have been filling this newsgroup with so much garbage about me and
> for
> > > so long, there is no way you could stop doing that for years.
>
> > > You have to start your stopping now.
>
> > > Rocky -http://wookiee.home.att.net
>
> > Just spreading the truth about you. Thats all.
>
> > Now, unlike you, I have to get up and go to work in the morning. I
> > know you'll post another response. You have to have the last word.
> > But I am tired of your childish games, loser.
>
> Why don't you just stop your bullshit?
>
> If you are tired of me getting the last word then start to think of a
> compromise.
>
Ok. You leave and I'll leave you alone. How's that?
Ed Propes
>
> Ok. You leave and I'll leave you alone. How's that?
Would you be interested in a "white flag" so speak? Don't know anything
for sure yet but .....
Top
Gashauler
"Ed Propes" <e...@linux-e7a8.site> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.23....@linux-e7a8.site...
A Teamster
Dave Smith
But you guys keep watching. You would have a lot more fun with him if you
could learn not to respond.
Rocky
Why quit now? I'm on a roll. I have you pegged green Tim, and I've got all
sorts of documentation in the works about your eating of flamebait already.
The word I've been looking for to describe one of your tricks finally came
to me. You use a "Bluff." Little do you realize it, you have eaten so much
flamebait and a lot of it your own flamebait that all you have to show for
your flamebait is more flamebait.
If you want to keep this "Holy War" going I might start calling it a Crusade
too. My plan is to show the power of flamebait when used by Trolls like you
and your buddies.
I still think it is funny that our "Holy War" has moved back to the exact
thread it was started on in December 2003!
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
Rocky
"Dave Smith" <adavi...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:462D37CE...@sympatico.ca...
You can't break the ritual of this newsgroup where once Davfraud Rufbish
post flamebait everybody has to give him a high five.
Dave Smith, I bet it won't be long before you prove you have eaten his
flamebait hook line and sinker.
Here, put it this way, do you think anybody like Dave can bullshit about
someone's CDL and then be honest anywhere else? Not hardly.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
Mahatma Kanejeeves
>Oh ya, I'm holding my breath in my left hand
> and typing with my right.
That's not just your breath you're holding there, I'll wager.
> Now how do I stop laughing?
Keep on holding your breath.
realitytrucker
>
> - Show quoted text -
Look at all the people, in just this thread alone, who seem to think
that YOU are the problem. Please tell us what you think about that?
Are all of these people wrong? Are all of these people "trolls"
because they don't agree with you?
>From your posts you seem to think everyone is wrong...that only you
are right. How do you explain that, Roger? Or are you going to avoid
these questions as you usually do? And no, they aren't "loaded"
questions. But you're probably still going to be to chickenshit to
answer them, aren't you?
realitytrucker
>
> Why quit now? I'm a troll. I have you pegged green Tim, and I've got all
> sorts of documentation in the works about your eating of flamebait already.
>
> The word I've been looking for to describe one of your tricks finally came
> to me. You use a "Bluff." Little do you realize it, you have eaten so much
> flamebait and a lot of it your own flamebait that all you have to show for
> your flamebait is more flamebait.
>
> If you want to keep this "Holy War" going I might start calling it a Crusade
> too. My plan is to show the power of flamebait when used by Trolls like you
> and your buddies.
>
> I still think it is funny that our "Holy War" has moved back to the exact
> thread it was started on in December 2003!
>
> Rocky -http://wookiee.home.att.net- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You go, girl! You document all you want but your posts speak for
themselves. You're denial speaks for itself. You are despised by
everyone here yet you keep posting.
No one cares to read your childishness yet you continue to post.
YUou post for one reason only: TO TROLL.
Rocky
Now here is a challenge for you.
Try to prove that they have not eaten any flamebait from Dave Ruff, Dave
Smith, tscottme or you.
Ah, I see, you use flamebait all the freak'n time yet you want to deny the
damage it does.
You are a Typical Troll Tim.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
Rocky
You use flamebait and lies all the freak'n time yet you want to deny the
damage you and your other flamebaiters have done.
realitytrucker
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Look at all the people, in just this thread alone, who seem to think
> > that YOU are the problem. Please tell us what you think about that?
> > Are all of these people wrong? Are all of these people "trolls"
> > because they don't agree with you?
>
> Now here is a challenge for you.
>
> Try to prove that they have not eaten any flamebait from Dave Ruff, Dave
> Smith, tscottme or you.
>
> Ah, I see, you use flamebait all the freak'n time yet you want to deny the
> damage it does.
>
> You are a Typical Troll Tim.
>
> Rocky -http://wookiee.home.att.net- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I don't need to document anything. I don't need to dig thru old
posts. You prove my point with every post you make, the frequency of
your posting, and the number of posts. This one was a classic
example. I don't think I posted more than 5 minutes ago yet you were
replying to it immediately with yet another typical crying, whining,
accusatory "It wasn't me it was you" rocky style post.
realitytrucker
> > that YOU are the problem. Please tell us what you think about that?
> > Are all of these people wrong? Are all of these people "trolls"
> > because they don't agree with you?
>
> Now here is a challenge for you.
>
No, here's one for you. Answer those questions. How can everyone be
wrong and only Roger "Rocky" Wittekind be right? What makes Rocky so
special that he can newer be wrong?
Rocky
You use flamebait and lies all the freak'n time yet you want to deny the
damage you and your other flamebaiters have done.
You are a Typical Troll Tim.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
Rocky
You use flamebait and lies all the freak'n time yet you want to deny the
damage you and your other flamebaiters have done.
You are a Typical Troll Tim.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
Oh, and I know you do not really want an answer to your loaded questions.
You just want to use your loaded questions to spread more of your flamebait.
bbelly
>
> If you are tired of me getting the last word then start to think of a
> compromise.
I would concur with the compromise suggested by realitytrucker.
Leave and your name will never reappear in mtt.
To satisfy your 'last word' need, you could try " bye "
realitytrucker
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1177378319.0...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> You use flamebait and lies all the freak'n time yet you want to deny the
> damage you and your other flamebaiters have done.
>
> You are a Typical Troll Tim.
>
>
> Oh, and I know you do not really want an answer to your loaded questions.
> You just want to use your loaded questions to spread more of your flamebait.
Oh, but I DO want answers. And please, define "loaded". I do not
know what you mean. All I see is a cowardness on your part toward
answering a few simple questions.
Rocky
"bbelly" <brian-be...@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:o6eXh.121528$6m4.14944@pd7urf1no...
Once more someone has to add flamebait to flamebait.
Rocky
In case you do not know what a loaded question is, check this site out:
http://www.info-pollution.com/complex.htm
Your post above shows you still use "Flamebait."
Try and prove to me that you can post without "Flamebait" for once.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
realitytrucker
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1177385971.7...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 23, 9:56 pm, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
> >> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1177378319.0...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> You use flamebait and lies all the freak'n time yet you want to deny the
> >> damage you and your other flamebaiters have done.
>
> >> You are a Typical Troll Tim.
>
> >> Rocky -http://wookiee.home.att.net
>
> >> Oh, and I know you do not really want an answer to your loaded questions.
> >> You just want to use your loaded questions to spread more of your
> >> flamebait.
>
> > Oh, but I DO want answers. And please, define "loaded". I do not
> > know what you mean. All I see is a cowardness on your part toward
> > answering a few simple questions.
>
> In case you do not know what a loaded question is, check this site out:http://www.info-pollution.com/complex.htm
>
> Your post above shows you still use "Flamebait."
>
> Try and prove to me that you can post without "Flamebait" for once.
>
Sorry. My questions do not fit that definition. I simply want to
know what makes you think you are always right and that the rest of
the posters, or at least the ones that agree with me regarding you
(and that's at least 99% of them) are so wrong. Thats IS what you
seem to think, at least according to your posts. Everytime someone
disagrees with you you call them a "troll" or accuse them of spreading
(in your terms) "flamebait". Why is that? I just want to know what
makes everyone else wrong and ONLY you right? It is NOT a loaded
question. You are just afraid of the answer.
Rocky
Without you knowing what the word"Flamebait" means and how much "Flamebait"
there is in this newsgroup there can be no intelligent conversation with
you.
Tim. Do this newsgroup a big favor and learn what "Flamebait" is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamebait
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
bbelly
You refused to answer the same query before you latched on to the loaded
word "flamebait"
The newsgroup doesn't need the 'favour' of knowing what "flamebait" is.
"Flamebait is as flamebait does"
Get off your high horse. You can't defend yourself by avoiding the
question through some god forsaken attempt at drawing a line you can't
cross. It seems to be the best meager attempt at avoiding something you
don't want to address. That in itself is a first ... I have not noted
you for avoiding _anything_.
The fact that you can't answer the simple question " How is it that
everyone else is wrong while you are right? " is the penultimate
indication that this is simply a statement YOU CAN NOT DEFEND.
Thank you in advance for the polite reply this will generate.
Think you could manage without the 'potty mouth' ?
Rocky
"bbelly" <brian-be...@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message
Fine, but I know what the definition of "Flamebait" is and it describes Tim
to a 'T'.
It states: "over a topic the troll often has no real interest in"
Tim has "no real interest" in his loaded questions. If he did, he could
post a question without loading it or "Flaming" in the same post.
Besides, I've told Tim before. I'm on a Crusade to show how much damage
flamebait from Dave Ruff can do to a newsgroup.
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
Ed Propes
This is doing no good at all. Just inflames feelings all the more.
Top
Rocky 4
"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.03123...@posting.google.com...
> Rookie with 676 weeks <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
news:<vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com>...
> > what do you'all think of my new name?
>
> If you close that little laptop and put it away and devote the time
> you spend trolling newsgroups, thinking up user names, and defending
> morons like Bullis to actually driving a truck and learning the trade
> you might become a decent truck driver
YHBT Tim.
Tim, this is the very first time that you gave this NG evidence that you
were Trolled. (feed BS)
Not only were you trolled but you were trolled by more than one troll too.
Jeff was #1. The post you replied to was from Jeff/Zčke not me and he
admits that elsewhere.
Dave was #2. The post where you got the "defending morons" from was
recanted by Dave Ruff later.
Scott could have been #3. The rest of your post shows you picked up a bad
attitude from someone and it could have been Scott.
There you have it, the very first time that you proved you were Trolled and
now you can't stop being Trolled.
Rocky
Found Not Guilty By Jury
I know you stole that idea from me Zeke and what do you think of my new
name?
-----------------------------------
There is the old adage in criminal trials that describes a person who
represents himself at trial: "He has a fool for a client."
"He has a fool for a client?" ROTFLMAO
Signed: "Found Not Guilty By Jury" in a Unanimous Decision
Recently updated:
http://SlimeFest.com
realitytrucker
wrote:
In your case the attorney has a fool for a client and the client has
an even bigger fool for a lawyer,
The Honorable Dr. Rocky Roads Presiding Judge
> On Jun 25, 1:12�pm, "Found Not Guilty By Jury" <wook...@att.net>
> wrote:
> > "Rookie with 676 weeks" <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote
> >
> > > what do you'all think of my new name?
> >
> > I know you stole that idea from me Zeke and what do you think of my new
> > name?
> >
> > -----------------------------------
> >
> > There is the old adage in criminal trials that describes a person who
> > represents himself at trial: "He has a fool for a client."
> >
> > "He has a fool for a client?" �ROTFLMAO
> >
> > Signed: "Found Not Guilty By Jury" in a Unanimous Decision
> >
> > Recently updated:http://SlimeFest.com
>
> In your case the attorney
. . . was beat by a unanimous decision.
Yes I know that already you Idiot.
Rocky - with a landslide victory where it counted.
The Honorable Dr. Rocky Roads Presiding Judge
You are talking the "criminal trial" that I won with a "unanimous
verdict" so if that were true what does it make Casey Stengel that
lost to me and only me?
ROTFLMAO
Signed: "Found Not Guilty By Jury" and I think I'll have that put on a
baseball hat so I can wear it proudly.
Rocky
"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.03123...@posting.google.com...
> Rookie with 676 weeks <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
news:<vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com>...
>
> you spend trolling newsgroups, thinking up user names, and defending
> morons like Bullis to actually driving a truck and learning the trade
> you might become a decent truck driver
"defending morons like Bullis?"
Those were fighting words and they would turn all sorts of imbeciles on this
NG against me so the very least you could do is explain where you got them
from.
I think you got them from Dave Ruff when he made a statement on December 16,
2003 that he later recanted.
http://MTT.JusticeGoneWild.com
Rocky - Watch Tim do the SideStep again.
realitytrucker
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@aol.com> wrote in message
You defended pedophilia, asswipe. Remember? And trust me, wannabe,
my words turned no one against you. It was your own words that did
it. You are an asshole. You proved yourself an asshole very early on
in your posting history on this group. Stop blaming me and other
people, you sniveling girl. You did it to yourself...just like with
Cheryl.
I challeng you to can find one poster..just ONE..who will back up
your ludicrious claims that my words...or anyone's words other than
your own..turned anyone against you.
You won't. You can't. Because no one exists. It's far too late in
the game to try blaming others for your own actions.
The Honorable Dr. Rocky Roads Presiding Judge
Once more you are sidestepping. Go ahead and find the post if it even
exist and let others see what you have made such a BFD about all these
years.
I knew you would do the sidestep again and you did.
JerryD(upstateNY)
brakes.
With only a few weeks experience, he already thought of a better way than to
check the distance between the shoes and the drum.
He would put the trailer brakes on and then put it in gear and try to pull
ahead.
It's a wonder he didn't twist off a driveshaft, to say nothing of killing
himself or someone else.
--
JerryD(upstateNY)
"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
realitytrucker
wrote:
> The first thing I remember the nitwit posting was his way of checking
> brakes.
> With only a few weeks experience, he already thought of a better way than to
> check the distance between the shoes and the drum.
> He would put the trailer brakes on and then put it in gear and try to pull
> ahead.
> It's a wonder he didn't twist off a driveshaft, to say nothing of killing
> himself or someone else.
> --
> JerryD(upstateNY)
>
>
> You proved yourself an asshole very early on in your posting history on
> this group. Stop blaming me and other people, you sniveling girl. You did
> it to yourself...just like with Cheryl.
Remember his bright idea of using a video camera to check brake
lights? How about his imfamous (and extremely unsafe) "heel/toe"
manueveur for downshifting around turns?
realitytrucker
>
> - Show quoted text -
I have neither the time nor desire to spend hours going thru old
posts. Unlike you, I have a life, a ob, friends, family, all of the
things NORMAL people do. The posters who have been here thru it all
know what I am talking about.
The Honorable Dr. Rocky Roads Presiding Judge
> How about his imfamous (and extremely unsafe) "heel/toe"
> manueveur for downshifting around turns?
Not everybody calls it "unsafe" and it was "before" turns so you have
just planted more "Sucker Bait" you Troll.
Rocky
"JerryD(upstateNY)" <jer...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:g92v3v$p3b$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
> The first thing I remember the nitwit posting was his way of checking
> brakes.
> With only a few weeks experience, he already thought of a better way than
to
> check the distance between the shoes and the drum.
> He would put the trailer brakes on and then put it in gear and try to pull
> ahead.
> It's a wonder he didn't twist off a driveshaft, to say nothing of killing
> himself or someone else.
> --
> JerryD(upstateNY)
To make it look like you let the clutch out further than you need to is
simply adding more "Sucker Bait" to a newsgroup full of "Sucker Bait."
Plus, Dave Smith himself, before he got fed up with all the "Sucker Bait"
flying around here stated it can be done that way you Idiot.
Rocky
>
> I have neither the time nor desire to spend hours going thru old
> posts. Unlike you, I have a life, a ob, friends, family, all of the
> things NORMAL people do. The posters who have been here thru it all
> know what I am talking about.
YOU ARE SIDESTEPPING TIM.
I used the exact same e-mail address for all those post so it shouldn't be
hard at all for you to find it if it existed.
Once more, since you have filling this newsgroup with bullshit for almost 5
years because of so and so a post the very least you can do is show others
what gives you the right to fuck with me for so damn long.
NightRogue
Remember when he forgot to set the paeking brakes, then tried to blame
someone on here???
The Honorable Dr. Rocky Roads Presiding Judge
That "Sucker Bait" was started by you.
Gee this thread turned into a bunch of "Sucker Bait" junkies bragging
about their "Sucker Bait."
Rocky
"Rookie with 676 weeks" <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
news:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com...
> what do you'all think of my new name?
Since I'm tired of dealing with posters that use a "spoofedaddress" as you
did above I think you should e-mail me your real name, your real
address/city/state and references to people that know you along with their
contact information if you want me to answer a question you posted today.
Rocky
realitytrucker
> "Rookie with 676 weeks" <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in messagenews:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com...
>
> > what do you'all think of my new name?
> did above I think you should e-mail me your real name, your real
> address/city/state and references to people that know you along with their
> contact information if you want me to answer a question you posted today.
>
> Rocky
Hey, here's a novel idea! Change your "usenet handle" to
"ROLL OVER ROCKY"
Rocky
"Dave Smith" <adavi...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:462D37CE...@sympatico.ca...
>
> A Teamster wrote:
> >
> > "Gashauler" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in
> > news:nbudnfMCYbd3eLbb...@comcast.com:> > > news:1177281382....@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > You're trolling now by repetitious posting of nonsense.
> > >
> > > If you ignore him he cries and panics because no one is watching.
> > >
> > exactly
>
> But you guys keep watching. You would have a lot more fun with him if you
> could learn not to respond.
But they couldn't do that because I was their Target you IDIOT.
Why do you think it was necessary for them to tell so many lies about my
CDL? Betcha can't answer that.
http://MTT.JusticeGoneWild.com
Rocky