Dan the back biter
Greegor
Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> allegation by Denise Richards.
>
> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computer.
>
> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> and the
> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> agencies for possible investigation.
Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he can
read it.
Did the IC3 section handle the investigation of Charlie Sheen?
There is another UNIT of the FBI that handles kid porn.
I'm not sure whether they'd need IC3's help or not.
I'm guessing not.
But then again, you've never explained what you think
Ken did to be investigated by the IC3 division.
Greegor
G > Dan, I can't speak for Ken,
Moe > And yet Ken uses you as his puppet.
That you see it that way must chap your hide.
Moe > You repeat what Kennie says and in at
Moe > least one case you were sloppy enough
Moe > to C&P what Kennie must have sent
Moe > you,complete with Kennie's misspellings.
Fiction.
Moe > He can read it the same way I can.
Moe > his excuse that Verozon doesn't let
Moe > him read ALT groups is bullshit.
Moe > Verizon is an internet carrier, not a
Moe > newsreader. He laos crossposts
Laos?
Moe > TO alt groups, which he shouldn't be
Moe > able to do if his claims about
Moe > Verizon are true.
G > Did the IC3 section handle the investigation of Charlie Sheen?
G > There is another UNIT of the FBI that handles kid porn.
Moe > And you would know that why Greg?
Do you read a newspaper?
Moe > Have an interest in child porn greggie?
No.
Moe > Is that why you are sucking to to Kennie?
Nah, but you got so excited you stuttered.
G > I'm not sure whether they'd need IC3's help or not.
Moe > You're "not sure"? Oh really? So you
Moe > think Kennie might be into child porn Greg?
Nah.
G > I'm guessing not.
G > But then again, you've never explained what you think
G > Ken did to be investigated by the IC3 division.
Moe > I have a few ideas. One being based on his
Moe > CV as " Moore" posted it on his web site
So you think that the FBI will be interested
in a resume which Dave shouldn't have and
that Ken disavows as a fake, which is posted
on Dave's hate site?
Why would the FBI investigate Ken for that?
Do you think they want to dig into the THOUSANDS
of government employees got their JOBS or
promotions using Shaftsbury and similar diplomas?
The ones who used them for promotions got
them paid for by taxpayers, by the way.
I'm just suggesting that if you do talk to an FBI
agent about what you consider to be the crime
of the century, you might want to make sure
the agent didn't get HIS degree from
Shaftsbury or similar.
Check out the chain of command in fact.
No wait, the Federal Judge ordered the
huge list of Federal and state employees
who did that to be made secret!
What to do, what to do?
Moe > As an avid true crime reader
ROFL
Moe > Kennie's C.V. raised a few red flags
Moe > for me regarding his specific area of
Moe > " study". Frankly I think his area of "study"
Moe > was a cover for his sexual perversions,
Moe > perversions I think he's kept to this day.
Do you think these damned lies don't prove
what a complete bitch you are?
You hate Ken. I get it. But when your
lame ass arguments fail to win for you, you
resort to flat out lies. That tends to be
the only tactic you have left.
Moe > The way his " favorite" daughter
Moe > turned out to be a porn actress and
Moe > a prostitute
Where'd the prostitute thing come from?
It seems like the claims just morph to suit your mood.
Moe > when she supposedly was so talented and
Moe > promising as a teenager is another red flag
Moe > about Kennie and what he REALLY did to her.
I get that you hate Ken.
Has this stuff where you attack his (supposed)
family really made friends for you?
Or did you think that the bunches of Dave's
sock identities rooting for you were real people?
Please continue your attempts to insult me
with the use of gay as an epithet.
It's making you new friends.
Greegor
DS > child porn because of an allegation by
DS > Denise Richards.
DS > During the investigation the FBI took
DS > possession of Sheen's personal
DS > computer.
So what you're saying is that a false claim to
the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
That even if you know it's false you can cause
lots of harm by instigating false reports?
You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f0cb466-ff14-4052...@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
I wonder - did they FIND kiddie porn on Sheen's computer? Dan should
realize that HE is not Denise Richards.
krp
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/browse_frm/thread/2ff7bed4c74b0817
Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> allegation by Denise Richards.
>
> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computer.
>
> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> and the
> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> agencies for possible investigation.
GH> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he can
read it.
Because Dan Sullivan is "CHICKEN SHIT!"
Dan Sullivan
allegation by Denise Richards.
During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computer.
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f0cb466-ff14-4052...@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
No.
ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to be
"solid documentation of a CRIME."
Obviously pamgborn was lying.
> That even if you know it's false you can cause
> lots of harm by instigating false reports?
I'm not instigating fale reports.
> You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!
YOU'RE the manly man who was twice convicted for abusing a mentally ill
woman, grag.
And YOU'RE the manly man who is listed on the Iowa State Child Abuse
Registry, grag.
How PROUD are you?
Dan Sullivan
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:zjh9m.562$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
ken can read all my posts.
Greegor
DS > child porn because of an allegation by
DS > Denise Richards.
DS > During the investigation the FBI took
DS > possession of Sheen's personal
DS > computer.
G > So what you're saying is that a false claim to
G > the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
KRP > I wonder - did they FIND kiddie porn on Sheen's
KRP > computer? Dan should realize that HE is
KRP > not Denise Richards.
G > That even if you know it's false you can cause
G > lots of harm by instigating false reports?
G >
G > You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!
Dan's a MANLY man!
krp
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
>> DS > Denise Richards.
>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
>> DS > computer.
>>
>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
> No.
>
> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to be
> "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying. As far as I
know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child pornography. YOU made
that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE CUSTODY
FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn) which
went NOWHERE.
>> That even if you know it's false you can cause
>> lots of harm by instigating false reports?
> I'm not instigating fale reports.
You sure as shit are TRYING.I don't know about "FALE" reports, but you
sre are typing to instigate people into making FALSE reports.
krp
Not the ones you HIDE like the COWARD you ARE, Danny.
krp
DJS> Dan's a MANLY man!
Dan Sullivan is a GIRLYMAN!
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
>>> DS > Denise Richards.
>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
>>> DS > computer.
>>>
>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
>> No.
>>
>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to
>> be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
"Laying?"
> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
> pornography.
As far as you know?
Hilarious.
> YOU made that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE
> CUSTODY FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn)
> which went NOWHERE.
The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks.
>>> That even if you know it's false you can cause
>>> lots of harm by instigating false reports?
>
>> I'm not instigating fale reports.
>
> You sure as shit are TRYING.I don't know about "FALE" reports, but you
> sre are typing to instigate people into making FALSE reports.
I'm not instigating false reports.
krp
>
> "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:vKh9m.572$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>>
>> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>>
>>
>>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
>>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
>>>> DS > Denise Richards.
>>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
>>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
>>>> DS > computer.
>>>>
>>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
>>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to
>>> be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>>
>> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
>
> "Laying?"
>
>> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
>> pornography.
>
> As far as you know?
Danny - have you EVER heard anyone refer to it as "HOLLYWIERD?" Denise only
accused Sheen of having PORN. The Child Porn and the FBI are Sheen's
DRAMATIZATIONS.
Dan Sullivan
The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an accusation
of child porn by Denise Richards..
krp
>>>>
>>>>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
>>>>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
>>>>>> DS > Denise Richards.
>>>>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
>>>>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
>>>>>> DS > computer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
>>>>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have
>>>>> to be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>>>>
>>>> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
>>>
>>> "Laying?"
>>>
>>>> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
>>>> pornography.
>>>
>>> As far as you know?
>>
>> Danny - have you EVER heard anyone refer to it as "HOLLYWIERD?" Denise
>> only accused Sheen of having PORN. The Child Porn and the FBI are Sheen's
>> DRAMATIZATIONS.
>
> The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS. Danny, how SLOW
do you have to be to BELIEVE, hook, line and sinker, a Hollywood Press
Agent's BULLSHIT without question? Does it DAWN on you that the FBI never
CONFIRMED the story??????? Ya just ain't the brightest bulb in the box,
Danny!
Dan Sullivan
accusation of child porn by Denise Richards.
On Jul 21, 12:14 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a65b068$0$31269$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>>>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> >>>>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> >>>>>> DS > Denise Richards.
> >>>>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> >>>>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> >>>>>> DS > computer.
>
> >>>>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> >>>>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> >>>>> No.
>
> >>>>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have
> >>>>> to be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> >>>> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
>
> >>> "Laying?"
>
> >>>> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
> >>>> pornography.
>
> >>> As far as you know?
>
> >> Danny - have you EVER heard anyone refer to it as "HOLLYWIERD?" Denise
> >> only accused Sheen of having PORN. The Child Porn and the FBI are Sheen's
> >> DRAMATIZATIONS.
>
> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>
> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
computers for two weeks?
> Danny, how SLOW
> do you have to be to BELIEVE, hook, line and sinker, a Hollywood Press
> Agent's BULLSHIT without question?
What benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
computers for two weeks?
> Does it DAWN on you that the FBI never
> CONFIRMED the story??????? >
Does the FBI confirm ongoing or past investigations, kenny boy?
Non scrivetemi
Dan Sullivan
accusation of child porn by Denise Richards.
On Jul 21, 12:14 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
krp
> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>
> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
DJS> computers for two weeks?
Does it EVER occur to you that;
a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?
b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals hasn't
been ringing off the hook lately.)
c. He's pissed at Denise!
But THAT weoulds redquire a findtioning BRAIN/
Dan Sullivan
of child porn by Denise Richards.
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WFn9m.640$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:fe6d89e9-14b3-44c5...@e4g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
>> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>>
>> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
>
> DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
> DJS> computers for two weeks?
>
> Does it EVER occur to you that;
>
> a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?
You think that's a reason for Charlie Sheen to announce that the FBI is
going thru his computers looking for child porn?
> b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals hasn't
> been ringing off the hook lately.)
Charlie Sheen is in the top 10 highest paid TV Stars.
7.7 million a year.
> c. He's pissed at Denise!
That doesn't show he's pissed at Denise.
That shows WHY he's pissed at Denise.
> But THAT weoulds redquire a findtioning BRAIN/
A functioning brain know how to spell, kenny boy.
krp
>>> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
>>> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>>>
>>> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
>>
>> DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
>> DJS> computers for two weeks?
>>
>> Does it EVER occur to you that;
>>
>> a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?
> You think that's a reason for Charlie Sheen to announce that the FBI is
> going thru his computers looking for child porn?
Pretty much, yeah!
>> b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals
>> hasn't been ringing off the hook lately.)
> Charlie Sheen is in the top 10 highest paid TV Stars.
When was his last MAJOR film?
DJS> 7.7 million a year.
>> c. He's pissed at Denise!
> That doesn't show he's pissed at Denise.
> That shows WHY he's pissed at Denise.
It would if his story were true. How come you can't produce SQUAT from
the FBI?
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a660ce9$0$31267$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> >>> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>
> >>> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
>
> >> DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
> >> DJS> computers for two weeks?
>
> >> Does it EVER occur to you that;
>
> >> a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?
> > You think that's a reason for Charlie Sheen to announce that the FBI is
> > going thru his computers looking for child porn?
>
> Pretty much, yeah!
That's one of the more stupid statements you've made, kenny boy.
> >> b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals
> >> hasn't been ringing off the hook lately.)
> > Charlie Sheen is in the top 10 highest paid TV Stars.
>
> DJS> 7.7 million a year.
>
> When was his last MAJOR film?
7.7 million a year for the TV show.
> >> c. He's pissed at Denise!
> > That doesn't show he's pissed at Denise.
> > That shows WHY he's pissed at Denise.
>
> It would if his story were true. How come you can't produce SQUAT from
> the FBI?
Does the FBI comment on ongoing or past investigations, kenny boy?
Dan Sullivan
A few years ago Charlie Sheen was the highest paid actor on TV.
Dan Sullivan
"Charlie Sheen, who plays a wealthy, womanizing bachelor on the top-
rated sitcom "Two and a Half Men," made more than any other TV actor
this year with earnings of $825,000 per episode, including money from
his ownership rights in the show.
At the rate of 23 episodes per year, the typical number of shows
broadcast each season for a comedy like "Two and a Half Men," Sheen
would be pocketing just under $20 million a year for a role that also
earned him three Emmy nominations."
Yeah, kenny boy, like you said, Charlie Sheen is a "drama queen,"
NOT!!!
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> >> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> >> DS > Denise Richards.
> >> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> >> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> >> DS > computer.
>
> >> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> >> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
> > No.
>
> > ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to be
> > "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying. As far as I
> know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child pornography. YOU made
> that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE CUSTODY
> FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn) which
> went NOWHERE.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
Looks like an accusation of child porn, kenny boy.
Would the FBI have taken Charlie Sheen's computers for adult porn?
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer
Dan Sullivan <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
Flush!
whitevamp
> "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
> news:zjh9m.562$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> >news:c5956fe5-e622-4e76...@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> > Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
> > have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
>
> > On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> >> allegation by Denise Richards.
>
> >> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> >> computer.
>
> >> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> >> and the
> >> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> >> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> >> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> >> agencies for possible investigation.
>
> > GH> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he can
> > read it.
>
> > Because Dan Sullivan is "CHICKEN SHIT!"
>
> ken can read all my posts.
Yep, the same way I can. Kennie is just PRETENDING he can't read
certain usenet groups.
Assuming, OC, he hasn't FUBARed that crappy Windows Vista Mail
client he uses.
Moe
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
whitevamp
How proud and manly were you when you abused Lisa's daughter Greg?
whitevamp
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a65aa3e$0$31262$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >news:vKh9m.572$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> >>news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> >>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> >>>> DS > Denise Richards.
> >>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> >>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> >>>> DS > computer.
>
> >>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> >>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> >>> No.
>
> >>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to
> >>> be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> >> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
>
> > "Laying?"
>
> >> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
> >> pornography.
>
> > As far as you know?
>
> Danny - have you EVER heard anyone refer to it as "HOLLYWIERD?"
Yes. Michael Medved for one, who BTW was wrong about the " monogamy"
of penguins.
Just because they are in Hollywood does not automatically mean they
are " clean". Hanoi Jane Fonda, for example, was responsible for the
deaths of four air men because of what she did and she should have
been tried for treason. Her father and her brother were both great
actors. Conversely there have been a number of people in the motion
picture industry who were unjustly accused of things they in fact
never did. The Fatty Arbuckle case, for example. And OC the McCarthy
commie hunts. There is still a question whether or not George Reeve
actually shot himself or someone killed him.
> Denise only
> accused Sheen of having PORN. The Child Porn and the FBI are Sheen's
> DRAMATIZATIONS.
Why would Sheen "dramatize" having child porn on his computer? Seems
that would be self-destructive.
whitevamp
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:fe6d89e9-14b3-44c5...@e4g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> > > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>
> > According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
>
> DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
> DJS> computers for two weeks?
>
> Does it EVER occur to you that;
>
> a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?
>
> b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals hasn't
> been ringing off the hook lately.)
Hmn, a TV series comes to mind " Two and a Half Men".
"pucture"?
BTW how would YOU know if Sheen's phone is ringing about deals or not
Kennie?
Was your Santeria high priest consulting you?
You'd also might want to look at the IMDB before you post about an
actor.
Moe
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>
jerry warner
Greegor wrote:
> Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
> have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
>
> On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> > allegation by Denise Richards.
> >
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computer.
> >
> > The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> > and the
> > National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
> >
> > Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> > federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> > agencies for possible investigation.
>
> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he can
> read it.
>
> Did the IC3 section handle the investigation of Charlie Sheen?
>
> There is another UNIT of the FBI that handles kid porn.
>
> I'm not sure whether they'd need IC3's help or not.
>
> I'm guessing not.
>
> But then again, you've never explained what you think
> Ken did to be investigated by the IC3 division.
Greegor
DS > child porn because of an allegation by
DS > Denise Richards.
DS > During the investigation the FBI took
DS > possession of Sheen's personal
DS > computer.
G > So what you're saying is that a false claim to
G > the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
G > That even if you know it's false you can cause
G > lots of harm by instigating false reports?
G > You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!
Moe > How proud and manly were you when you
Moe > abused Lisa's daughter Greg?
Lies to distract again.
You overlook your tacit admission that
Dan's attempt to instigate false reports
to the FBI is a cowardly style, and
even somewhat effeminate.
krp
> Less than a year ago,
> http://www.reuters.com/article/televisionNews/idUSN0451456620080804
>
> "Charlie Sheen, who plays a wealthy, womanizing bachelor on the top-
> rated sitcom "Two and a Half Men," made more than any other TV actor
> this year with earnings of $825,000 per episode, including money from
> his ownership rights in the show.
>
> At the rate of 23 episodes per year, the typical number of shows
> broadcast each season for a comedy like "Two and a Half Men," Sheen
> would be pocketing just under $20 million a year for a role that also
> earned him three Emmy nominations."
>
krp
On Jul 21, 7:35 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> >> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> >> DS > Denise Richards.
> >> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> >> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> >> DS > computer.
>
> >> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> >> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
> > No.
>
> > ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to
> > be
> > "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying. As far as I
> know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child pornography. YOU made
> that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE CUSTODY
> FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn) which
> went NOWHERE.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
DJS> Looks like an accusation of child porn, kenny boy.
In YOUR mind "Very young women" translates to KIDDIE PORN. Some 30 year
old women LOOK very young, Danny.
DJS> Would the FBI have taken Charlie Sheen's computers for adult porn?
No PROOF that they did, other than Sheen's publicists claims.
Dan Sullivan
Then why did the FBI have Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks?
Dan Sullivan
allegation by Denise Richards.
During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for three weeks.
On Jul 22, 12:51 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > How proud and manly were you when you
> Moe > abused Lisa's daughter Greg?
>
> Lies to distract again.
You've been on the Iowa State Child Abuse Registry since 2001, grag.
> You overlook your tacit admission that
> Dan's attempt to instigate false reports
> to the FBI is a cowardly style,
I never suggested anyone file a false report.
The real reports will suffice.
> and even somewhat effeminate.
Hilarious!
You beat off to anything, grag.
krp
> > Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying. As far as I
> > know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child pornography. YOU
> > made
> > that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE
> > CUSTODY
> > FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn) which
> > went NOWHERE.
>
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
>
> DJS> Looks like an accusation of child porn, kenny boy.
>
> In YOUR mind "Very young women" translates to KIDDIE PORN.
DJS> Then why did the FBI have Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks?
There is NO real evidence other than from Sheen's PRESS AGENT that they
did.
Dan Sullivan
by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for two weeks.
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:bzF9m.771$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn is
something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy porn,
is that your claim, kenny boy?
krp
> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
That's NOT accurate.
> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computers for two weeks.
So says Charlie Sheen's PUBLICIST, Danny. What does the FBI say??????
krp
> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computers for two weeks.
> Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn is
> something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY! How much BULLSHIT was released by
Carole Lombard press agents? Humphrey Bogat's when he was BOINLING Lauren
Bacall while married to another woman?
> Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy
> porn, is that your claim, kenny boy?
1. Sheen IS a drama queen.
2. He is fighting with Richards who has been screwing him over.
3. Sheen MAY be suffering from Munchausen's syndrome.
Dan Sullivan
by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for two weeks.
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:AmG9m.530$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
>> allegation by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
>
> That's NOT accurate.
>
>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
>> computers for two weeks.
>>
>> Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn
>> is something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>>
>> Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy
>> porn, is that your claim, kenny boy?
>
> So says Charlie Sheen's PUBLICIST, Danny. What does the FBI say??????
I don't believe the FBI comments on their investigations, kenny boy, unless
an arrest was made.
krp
>> So says Charlie Sheen's PUBLICIST, Danny. What does the FBI say??????
> I don't believe the FBI comments on their investigations, kenny boy,
> unless an arrest was made.
That they "ALLEGEDLY" gave the computers back would indicate that the
file was CLOSED. IF there ever was one. The FBI, Danny, doesn't comment on
BULLSHIT!
Dan Sullivan
by Denise Richards in their divorce papers.
In a document submitted to court "under the penalty of perjury" Denise
Richards described the girls on the websites and underage, with pigtails and
braces engaging in oral sex.
During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for two weeks.
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:XqG9m.532$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...
>
>> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
>> allegation by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
>
>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
>> computers for two weeks.
>
>> Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn
>> is something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY! How much BULLSHIT was released
> by Carole Lombard press agents? Humphrey Bogat's when he was BOINLING
> Lauren Bacall while married to another woman?
>
>> Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy
>> porn, is that your claim, kenny boy?
>
> 1. Sheen IS a drama queen.
In your opinion, kenny boy.
> 2. He is fighting with Richards who has been screwing him over.
The divorce was final in November of 2006.
> 3. Sheen MAY be suffering from Munchausen's syndrome.
Charlie Sheen thinks he's ill, and he's not?
Is that your professional diagnosis as a psychologist with two "Cum Laude"
university degrees, kenny boy???
Dan Sullivan
In a document submitted to court "under the penalty of perjury" Denise
Richards described the girls on the websites as underage, with pigtails and
braces engaging in oral sex.
During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for two weeks.
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:6wG9m.536$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a6733c2$0$10286$607e...@cv.net...
>
>>> So says Charlie Sheen's PUBLICIST, Danny. What does the FBI say??????
>
>> I don't believe the FBI comments on their investigations, kenny boy,
>> unless an arrest was made.
>
> That they "ALLEGEDLY" gave the computers back would indicate that the
> file was CLOSED.
As I said, the FBI returned the computers in a few weeks.
I'm sure the FBI investigates many allegations that don't result in an
arrest.
> IF there ever was one. The FBI, Danny, doesn't comment on BULLSHIT!
Or investigations unless an arrest was made?
whitevamp
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
>
> >> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:c5956fe5-e622-4e76...@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> >> have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
>
> >> On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
>
> >>> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> >>> and the
> >>> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> >>> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> >>> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> >>> agencies for possible investigation.
>
> >> can read it.
>
> >> Because Dan Sullivan is "CHICKEN SHIT!"
>
> > ken can read all my posts.
>
Question? How can anyone " hide" posts on usenet? Since Sullivan uses
one account for ALL HIS posts, certainly Kenniepoo can use teh same
service I use ( Google Groups) to see ALL of Sullivan's posts.
Kennie darling, do you need help figuring out how to actually use a
newsreader?
(( laughing))
Let's see there's Forte FreeAgent, there's Google.......
Kennie your " excuse" that Verizon doesn't let you read alt groups is
bullshit.
Why would Sullivan" hide" some of his posts when you through your
doggie grag can know they exist? Is your pretense of not being able to
read alt groups something you put up to hide your forged posts?
Wait, you were CAUGHT forging post in the alt.atheism group. A group
you supposedly can't read.
(( SIGH)) Kennie the liar again.
whitevamp
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> G > So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> G > the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> KRP > I wonder - did they FIND kiddie porn on Sheen's
> KRP > computer? Dan should realize that HE is
> KRP > not Denise Richards.
>
> G > That even if you know it's false you can cause
> G > lots of harm by instigating false reports?
> G >
> G > You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!
>
>
> Dan Sullivan is a GIRLYMAN!
Oh you mean a LADIES MAN?
He's that good looking?
whitevamp
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...
>
> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> > by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computers for two weeks.
> > Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn is
> > something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY!
So were a number of leading male actors who married women. A gay
male can marry a woman, and in Hollywood it is a good cover to avoid
rumors of being gay. Also Teddie Haggard is gay and is still married
to HIS wife.
Since YOU have had some " bitter" divorces, may we assume YOU are
gay?
>How much BULLSHIT was released by
> Carole Lombard press agents? Humphrey Bogat's when he was BOINLING Lauren
> Bacall while married to another woman?
Nice avoidance Kenniepoo. The point is Sheen's press agent revealed
the FBI had his computers for two weeks investigation the allegation
of child porn. That would not work in Sheen's favor, would it, as far
as further job opportunities.
Why the sudden panic about child porn found in computers Kennie?
>
> > Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy
> > porn, is that your claim, kenny boy?
>
> 1. Sheen IS a drama queen.
According to you. Actually Tom Cruise is a drama queen.
>
> 2. He is fighting with Richards who has been screwing him over.
So his publicist reveals the kiddie porn on his computers bit? Golly
that will get him more acting jobs right Kennie?
>
> 3. Sheen MAY be suffering from Munchausen's syndrome.
According to whom? YOU?
(( Kennie rant mode on))
Are you now the GREAT EXPERT TEH AUTRORITE of MENTEL ILLNESSES now?
Where's your DEGREAS?? HUH HUH HUH HUH?????
(( kennie rant mode off))
krp
"whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ed47c930-cd4b-4bd3...@m11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> >>> computer.
>
> >>> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> >>> and the
> >>> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> >>> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> >>> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> >>> agencies for possible investigation.
>
> >> GH> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he
> >> can read it.
>
> >> Because Dan Sullivan is "CHICKEN SHIT!"
>
> > ken can read all my posts.
>
> Not the ones you HIDE like the COWARD you ARE, Danny.
MOE> Question? How can anyone " hide" posts on usenet? Since Sullivan uses
MOE> one account for ALL HIS posts, certainly Kenniepoo can use teh same
MOE> service I use ( Google Groups) to see ALL of Sullivan's posts.
WHY must I change services to suit DANNY and an IDIOT like YOU?
krp
> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> by Denise Richards in their divorce papers.
>
> In a document submitted to court "under the penalty of perjury" Denise
> Richards described the girls on the websites and underage, with pigtails
> and braces engaging in oral sex.
>
> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computers for two weeks.
In Richards statement they were "YOUNG WOMEN" she did NOT say children
OR "young girls" you are a LIAR. As to the FBI doing anything, the ONLY
source for that is Sheen's press release, and nothing from the FBI or ANY
law enforcement agency!!!! And, of course DAN SULLIVAN!'
krp
> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> > allegation
> > by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computers for two weeks.
> > Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn
> > is
> > something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY!
MOE> So were a number of leading male actors who married women.
Rock Hudson? Not to mention STARLETS like Barbara Stanwyck (MOMMIE
DEAREST). Greta Garbo? Marlena Dietrich? Maybe Kelly McGillis?
MOE> Since YOU have had some " bitter" divorces, may we assume YOU are gay?
Actually *I* didn't say my divorces were "bitter" but David Moore
claimed they were.
>How much BULLSHIT was released by Carole Lombard press agents? Humphrey
>Bogat's when he was BOINKING Lauren
> Bacall while married to another woman?
MOE> Nice avoidance Kenniepoo. The point is Sheen's press agent revealed
MOE> the FBI had his computers for two weeks investigation the allegation
MOE> of child porn. That would not work in Sheen's favor, would it, as far
MOE> as further job opportunities.
So YOU and Sullivan claim. It sure got POOR PICKED ON Charlie Sheen lots
of sympathy.No real proof that any of the story was true. Great attention
seeking device.
whitevamp
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Bad excuse Kennie.
You were caught forging posts in the alt.atheism group, so you CAN
access alt groups.
Try some better lies Kennie. That one's not working.
whitevamp
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
Got any links to prove your Kiennie?
Thought not.
As if you ever actually shown independent proof of your claims....
whitevamp
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
You are the one mentioning Charlie Sheen, Kennie.
Why the hostility to Sheen? You seem really hateful of the guy for
some reason.
BTW Kennie, when your misspellings even show in your subject headers,
you might want to clam down and do some spell checking before you
post.
" Charlie Seen"?
(( laughing))
whitevamp
>
> news:2183e6ab-fb74-4aa0...@y19g2000yqy.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> > > allegation
> > > by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
> > > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > > computers for two weeks.
> > > Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn
> > > is
> > > something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> > Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> > agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> > from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY!
>
> MOE> So were a number of leading male actors who married women.
>
> Rock Hudson? Not to mention STARLETS like Barbara Stanwyck (MOMMIE
> DEAREST). Greta Garbo? Marlena Dietrich? Maybe Kelly McGillis?
>
On the subject of actors and actresses who are gay.
So what? Its their performances which we as viewers pay to see, not
whether or not they are AC or DC.
Liberace was gay yet he was a damn good pianist.
Leonardo da Vinci is rumored to have been gay yet that doesn't
devalue his many masterpieces.
Jesus Christ may have been gay, assuming he existed as a real person.
But his teachings of love and compassion are good ones that sadly a
number of Christians don't practice.
Gay or straight or asexual, as long as it doesn't include harming
anyone, so what?
Would an excellent doctor be disqualified simply because they are
gay?
Dan Sullivan
In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".
And "gay pornography" sites "involving very young men who also did not look
like adults."
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:8oJ9m.804$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a673744$0$10290$607e...@cv.net...
>
>> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
>> allegation by Denise Richards in their divorce papers.
>>
>> In a document submitted to court "under the penalty of perjury" Denise
>> Richards described the girls on the websites and underage, with pigtails
>> and braces engaging in oral sex.
>>
>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
>> computers for two weeks.
>
>
> In Richards statement they were "YOUNG WOMEN" she did NOT say children
> OR "young girls" you are a LIAR.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex with each other."
And "gay pornography" sites "involving very young men who also did not look
like adults."
krp
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
>
> In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
> Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
> girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".
YOUNG WOMEN, Danny. Young WOMEN.
Dan Sullivan
In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".
And "gay pornography" sites "involving very young men who also did not look
like adults."
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:bFK9m.558$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
My quote of what Denise Richards claimed in her court papers is accurate and
true.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".
And "gay pornography" sites "involving very young men who also did not look
like adults."
George Orwell
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...
>
> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> > by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
>
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computers for two weeks.
>
> > Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn is
> > something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY!
So what? Hell's bells son, you yourself are a ball sniffing drama
queen pathetic loser excuse for a human being, and you still had a
wife for a while.
Of course now you're reduced to renting pussy, but then Burr had
money and success on his side and all you have is....
[crickets]
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
Greegor
Moe > may we assume YOU are gay?
For somebody who can't get a date with either
gender to complain about other people's
marital experiences is funny.
mmrpurdue
Nothing funny about you going to jail for beating your ex wife is
there greg? Maybe there is. Care to repost your advice to men as they
go off to jail or should I ?
Greegor
Moe > simply because they are gay?
Would they? I don't think so.
What do you think about gay people
counseling hetero couples on marriage?
How about (supposedly) celibate priests
dispensing marital advice, Moe?
How about misfits who can't get a date
with either gender?
krp
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
>
> In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
> Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
> girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".
She said "YOUNG WOMEN" Danny.
Dan Sullivan
kennny boy, all anyone has to do is read
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html and know you are
lying about what denise Richards claimed in the court papers.
whitevamp
whitevamp
How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
But then you know what I think about you.
Greegor
> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> G > So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> G > the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> G > lots of harm by instigating false reports?
>
> G > You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!
>
> Moe > abused Lisa's daughter Greg?
>
> Lies to distract again.
> You overlook your tacit admission that
> Dan's attempt to instigate false reports
> to the FBI is a cowardly style, and
> even somewhat effeminate.
Dan?
Dan Sullivan
news:3rV9m.647$64...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
krp
On Jul 22, 7:11 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
> Moe > simply because they are gay?
>
> Would they? I don't think so.
>
> What do you think about gay people
> counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>
> How about (supposedly) celibate priests
> dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>
> How about misfits who can't get a date
> with either gender?
MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
them?
mmrpurdue
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
They should be court ordered to be your personal fat crack cleaner.
krp
"mmrpurdue" <mmrp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:752cede9-5ece-4550...@m11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
> > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>
> > Would they? I don't think so.
>
> > What do you think about gay people
> > counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>
> > How about (supposedly) celibate priests
> > dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>
> > How about misfits who can't get a date
> > with either gender?
>
> MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
>
> What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
> them?
DDM> They should be court ordered to be your personal fat crack cleaner.
Up to your typical blazing intellect, I see, Davey. WOW!
mmrpurdue
> "mmrpurdue" <mmrpur...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
It was as intectual as your comments about David's cum stream, WOW!
whitevamp
Are you mistaking yourself for Dan now?
whitevamp
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
And this is relevant to grag how?
Any female that " allows" her BF to molest her kids deserves serious
jail time. Any PARENT that beats up their kids deserves serious jail
time and lose custody of their children.
One bitch chose her abusive boyfriend who meat her up for years and
on his birthday demanded she' give" him her young daughter to molest.
The bitch held her down while the bastard raped her repeatedly. Now,
while she's serving some heavy time in prison ( which she richly
deserves) she's doing the crying and remorse act.
whitevamp
And clean up after his " accidents".
whitevamp
As opposed to your displays of " intellect" Kennie?
Pot,kettle.
whitevamp
> On Jul 24, 3:03 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:4f7d3ea7-ca56-4b70...@h21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jul 22, 7:11 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
> > > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>
> > > Would they? I don't think so.
>
> > > What do you think about gay people
> > > counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>
> > > How about (supposedly) celibate priests
> > > dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>
> > > How about misfits who can't get a date
> > > with either gender?
>
> > MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
>
> > What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
> > them?
>
> And this is relevant to grag how?
>
> Any female that " allows" her BF to molest her kids deserves serious
> jail time. Any PARENT that beats up their kids deserves serious jail
> time and lose custody of their children.
>
> on his birthday demanded she' give" him her young daughter to molest.
> The bitch held her down while the bastard raped her repeatedly. Now,
> while she's serving some heavy time in prison ( which she richly
> deserves) she's doing the crying and remorse act.
Typo corrected.
>
> Moe
> Know your scum---http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
krp
> > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
> > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>
> > Would they? I don't think so.
>
> > What do you think about gay people
> > counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>
> > How about (supposedly) celibate priests
> > dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>
> > How about misfits who can't get a date
> > with either gender?
>
> MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
>
> What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
> them?
MOE> Any female that " allows" her BF to molest her kids deserves serious
MOE> jail time. Any PARENT that beats up their kids deserves serious jail
MOE> time and lose custody of their children.
But not only is abuse of children by mothers MORE common, so are cases
where the mothers know that their BF's are molesting the kids and they look
the other way. You said what about men who beat up women and molest girls.
Ever see the movie "Hard Candy?"
Dan Sullivan
>
> "whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:373a6ebf-868c-4878...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
>
>> > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
>> > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>>
>> > Would they? I don't think so.
>>
>> > What do you think about gay people
>> > counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>>
>> > How about (supposedly) celibate priests
>> > dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>>
>> > How about misfits who can't get a date
>> > with either gender?
>>
>> MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
>>
>> What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
>> them?
>
> MOE> Any female that " allows" her BF to molest her kids deserves serious
> MOE> jail time. Any PARENT that beats up their kids deserves serious jail
> MOE> time and lose custody of their children.
>
>
> But not only is abuse of children by mothers MORE common,
More mothers abuse their children than the fathers.
> so are cases where the mothers know that their BF's are molesting the kids
> and they look the other way.
More mothers know their BF's are molesting their kids than fathers know
their BF's are molesting their kids.
What are the odds?
> You said what about men who beat up women and molest girls. Ever see the
> movie "Hard Candy?"
Ah, using a fictional situation to establish a fact.
That work well in court, kenny boy?
whitevamp
> "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
> news:K2tam.892$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
>
>
>
>
Agreed. Fictional movies are not reality Kennie. That's why they are
called FICTION.
There are more than enough factual cases of abuses to refer to, not
some damn movie.
Try some actual factual sources for once Kenniepoo.
Fiction is not fact nor reality.
krp
Was any of that supposed to make sense, Danny?
Dan Sullivan
What you said didn't make sense, kenny boy, that's why I made light of it.
krp
>>> What are the odds?
Well Danny, do you know what that film was about? The story had a simple
answer to pedophiles.
Dan Sullivan
Is the movie NOT a work of fiction, kenny boy?
George Orwell
> kennny boy, all anyone has to do is read
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html and know you are
> lying about what denise Richards claimed in the court papers.
*laughing*
After all these years, and watching the scenario play out so many
times, even having joined the game myself once or twice... I *still*
love to watch Pigbarn get bent over the table and reamed. The guy's
such a total douchebag you can't help it! ;)
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
mmrpurdue
> Dan Sullivan wrote:
> > kennny boy, all anyone has to do is read
> > lying about what denise Richards claimed in the court papers.
>
> *laughing*
>
> After all these years, and watching the scenario play out so many
> times, even having joined the game myself once or twice... I *still*
> love to watch Pigbarn get bent over the table and reamed. The guy's
> such a total douchebag you can't help it! ;)
>
> Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
> non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
> reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
> di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
> Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
> https://www.mixmaster.it
Touché’ ****laughing***** along with you, as are all of us who
read his hysterical nonsense.
Greegor
Fiction in court? CPS does that all the time, but
not dramatization.
On the other hand, CPS agencies used an NBC Movie
of the Week as training on Ritual Satanic Child Abuse.
Domestic Violence classes used movies and
dramatized "vignettes" as the basis for discussions.
I noticed that in a few cases they PRESUMED
some things about the hypothetical situation
without question.
In one vignette (dramatization) they depicted
a situation where the woman was basically
embezzling large amounts of family budget
and telling lots of LIES about what she was up to.
The instructors even blamed all of that
onto the man.
The verbally abusive man was the REASON the woman
was grabbing money and being devious.
It never occurred to the instructors that the woman
swiping the freakin RENT MONEY and telling
lots of LIES might have PRECIPITATED the
verbal abuse!
krp
>>>>>>> > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
>>>>>>> > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>>>>>>>DJS > Would they? I don't think so.
>>>>> What are the odds?
You don't think incidents like that have happened in the real world,
Danny? Some states are mandating it upon a second conviction. Other states
(Louisiana) are giving the death penalty for pedophile repeat offenders or
cases where the child has been injured.
The FACTS here is that MOST child abuse is perpetrated in the homes of
single moms, to the level of more than 78% between her and her non-related
significant others. The # 1 perpetrator of physical abuse is MOTHERS.
Biological fathers account for the smallest group of offenders,
whitevamp
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
And where are your stats coming from Kennie? Your ass?
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
krp
MOE THE EXPERT> And where are your stats coming from Kennie? Your ass?
The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect reports. I have several
of them in PDF, Maureen. I KNOW you HATE MEN and need the perps to be all
MEN, it ain't so Maureen. It's women who abuse kids the most. Single moms.
Biological fathers are low on the statistical totem pole.
whitevamp
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
I don't hate men, You claiming that again and again doesn't change
the fact that I am not a misandryist. I don't fit your stereotype,
thank the Goddess.
You, OTOH, are clearly a misogynist.
Secondly, you claim to have the NCCAN reports on pdf. Presumably this
is not " proprietary" information. IOW anyone can get the files
online.
Cite your sources Kennie, You know, like footnotes do.
The problem with your claims, Kenniepoo, is that you're a habitual
liar. So anything you say has to be backed up by independent sources.
Jut like your claims about rape victims lying about their rapes and
how female victims of domestic abuse "provoke" their attackers, you
have the habit of claiming something is true when in fact it is not
true.
So where's the proof to back up your claims, Kennie? Title report
names and page numbers will do.
whitevamp
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Need help finding your pdf sources Kenniepoo?
Want me to show you some web sites that have the sources on child
abuse-- men vs women perpetrators?
Or are you going to avoid answering because of your own incompetence
in your chosen field of " study" where you ACTUAL motives for "study"
are based on your own genitalia, not on concern for victims of abuse.
And which states have executed people who abused children Kennie?
whitevamp
Here's one source:
http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/fatality.cfm#perps
(( begiin C&P))
Who Are the Perpetrators?
No matter how the fatal abuse occurs, one fact of great concern is
that the perpetrators are, by definition, individuals responsible for
the care and supervision of their victims. In 2007, one or both
parents were responsible for 69.9 percent of child abuse or neglect
fatalities. More than one-quarter (27.1 percent) of these fatalities
were perpetrated by the mother acting alone. Child fatalities with
unknown perpetrators accounted for 16.4 percent of the total.
There is no single profile of a perpetrator of fatal child abuse,
although certain characteristics reappear in many studies. Frequently,
the perpetrator is a young adult in his or her mid-20s, without a high
school diploma, living at or below the poverty level, depressed, and
who may have difficulty coping with stressful situations. In many
instances, the perpetrator has experienced violence firsthand. Most
fatalities from physical abuse are caused by fathers and other male
caregivers. Mothers are most often held responsible for deaths
resulting from child neglect (U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and
Neglect, 1995).
(( End C&P))
This plainly says that of 69.9 percent of the child fatalities
attributed to one or both parents, the mother acting alone percent is
27.1 percent.
Let's do the math since Kennie has shown he can't do even simple
percentages..
69.9
- 27.1
_______
42.8
IOW 42.8 percent of the child fatalities involving the parent abusing
the child are from the father or male abuser. 42.8 is more than 27.1.
Seems Kennie is wrong-- again.
Go ahead Kennie. I would love to see proof of your claims. If _I_
can find the sources easily enough, so should you ,seeing as you claim
I am stupid and all.... .
krp
Ms. McAllister would have us believe that women are thew PURE INNOCENT
VICTIMS of the male gender! It ain't so Moe! Women have every bit as much,
if not more ability to be bad little gyrls as men do to be bad boys. Save
your FEMIJNAZI PROPAGANDA for the weak minded!
MOE> Need help finding your pdf sources Kenniepoo? Want me to show you some
web sites that have the sources on child
MOE> abuse-- men vs women perpetrators?
Not your LESBIAN pals McAllister. The NCCAN and the Justice Department
have the sites up. Granted it takes some effort to yank the numbers out of
very complicated tables, and the math is probably WAY over the skull of a
bubble-headed BIMBO, like you - but it's there for all to see. You are too
stupid to know that your WICCAN BULLSHIT SISTERS have TRIED to go over this
with me in the past and wound up losing. NEXT!!!!!! To be specific, Carol
Ann Worstal Hemingway, and Marg Petersen. Nothing more fun than taking on a
not so switch Feminazi lesbian wiccan retard. GP FOR IT MOE!
krp
Here's one source:
http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/fatality.cfm#perps
(( begiin C&P))
Who Are the Perpetrators?
No matter how the fatal abuse occurs, one fact of great concern is
that the perpetrators are, by definition, individuals responsible for
the care and supervision of their victims. In 2007, one or both
parents were responsible for 69.9 percent of child abuse or neglect
fatalities. More than one-quarter (27.1 percent) of these fatalities
were perpetrated by the mother acting alone. Child fatalities with
unknown perpetrators accounted for 16.4 percent of the total.
That's just FATALITIES, Maureen.
For a MORE in depth look, see:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm06/index.htm
Don't TRY to cross swords with me Maureen. I'll take it away from you
and SPANK you raw with it. Save your simplistic shit for your fellow weak
minded Pagan pals.
krp
MOE> I don't hate men, You claiming that again and again doesn't change
MOE> the fact that I am not a misandryist. I don't fit your stereotype,
MOE> thank the Goddess.
That you are a virulent MAN HATER is obvious by the bulk of your posts
to Usenet over the past couple years. You ARE the stereotype, Maureen. YOU
and your fellow radical wiccan lesbian feminist cauldron worshippers.
mmrpurdue
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Moe is no such thing you little ninny, "virulent MAN HATER" or a "
radical wiccan lesbian feminist cauldron worshipper"
Your hysteria is out of control.
It is true that more women neglect/abuse their children. And it is
true that more men beat them to death.
All of it is equally horrifying. The point needs to be how we stop it
from happening.
Greegor
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
KRP > That you are a virulent MAN HATER is
KRP > obvious by the bulk of your posts to
KRP > Usenet over the past couple years. You
KRP > ARE the stereotype, Maureen. YOU
KRP > and your fellow radical wiccan lesbian
KRP > feminist cauldron worshippers.
Does FRANK know you're a Wiccan, Moe?
What ever happened to the 61 T-bird, by the way?
Greegor
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
That the fatality data shows 27.1 % were women
acting alone is interesting. That 69.9% involved
one or both parents is interesting.
That means that 30.1 % was not parents at all.
If 69.9 is parents and 30.1 is non-parents and
27.1 was mother alone, this brings up some
questions about mother acting together and
what percentage is male (not necessarily Dad.).
69.9 - 27.1 = 42.8
That 42.8 would be
A. Mom and Dad
B. Mom and non-parent combined
C. Dad alone
Got stats for those three lumped together?
Do you think the dads acting alone is
bigger or smaller than the 27.1%
of fatalities?
I seem to recall that it's much smaller.
It looks like MOE was comparing Moms
acting alone to an amalgam of several
numbers which conceals Dads acting alone.
Why not compare Dads alone to Moms alone?
Why compare Moms alone to a big catch all?
> That's just FATALITIES, Maureen.
>
> For a MORE in depth look, see:
>
> http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm06/index.htm
>
> Don't TRY to cross swords with me Maureen. I'll take it away from you
> and SPANK you raw with it. Save your simplistic shit for your fellow weak
> minded Pagan pals.
Why did Moe start with abuse and then switch to fatalities?
She didn't know this most BASIC statistic, that
women perpetrate MORE than men when it comes
to child abuse?
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:346d4600-3ab6-4c66...@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
GH> Why did Moe start with abuse and then switch to fatalities?
She HAD to. It was her best DIVERSION TACTIC.
whitevamp
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Kennie I " crossed swords" with you before in soc.veterans where I
whupped your ASS in showing your manylies about your AF " service".
Angry Kennie? About what? That I asked for proof of your claims? Or
that I questioned your " expertise"?
Your subject headers speak well for your own biases Kennie. You just
HAVE to keep on proving me right about your hatred of females.
As for the figures being " too complex" for me to supposedly handle,
considering that you some years ago filed for bankruptcy, you should
talk about figures Kenniepoo. If you can't do simple math concerning
your income and expenses, how can I believe that you supposedly
understand statistics in figures and tables?
Nice bluff, though OC you failed to show proof-- again.