Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...

23 views
Skip to first unread message

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 7:33:18 PM7/20/09
to
The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
allegation by Denise Richards.

During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computer.


Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 8:42:15 PM7/20/09
to

The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
and the
National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).

Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
agencies for possible investigation.

http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx

Greegor

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 11:13:57 PM7/20/09
to
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/browse_frm/thread/2ff7bed4c74b0817

Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...


Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he can
read it.

Did the IC3 section handle the investigation of Charlie Sheen?

There is another UNIT of the FBI that handles kid porn.

I'm not sure whether they'd need IC3's help or not.

I'm guessing not.

But then again, you've never explained what you think
Ken did to be investigated by the IC3 division.

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 11:33:20 PM7/20/09
to
On Jul 20, 10:13 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...

>
> Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
> have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
>
> On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> > allegation by Denise Richards.
>
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computer.
>
> > The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> > and the
> > National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> > Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> > federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> > agencies for possible investigation.
>
> Dan, I can't speak for Ken,

And yet Ken uses you as his puppet. You repeat what Kennie says and
in at least one case you were sloppy enough to C&P what Kennie must
have sent you,complete with Kennie's misspellings.

> but then you didn't post this where he can
> read it.

He can read it the same way I can. his excuse that Verozon doesn't
let him read ALT groups is bullshit. Verizon is an internet carrier,
not a newsreader. He laos crossposts TO alt groups, which he shouldn't
be able to do if his claims about Verizon are true.


>
> Did the IC3 section handle the investigation of Charlie Sheen?
>
> There is another UNIT of the FBI that handles kid porn.

And you would know that why Greg?

Have an interest in child porn greggie?

Is that why you are sucking to to Kennie?

>
> I'm not sure whether they'd need IC3's help or not.

You're "not sure"? Oh really? So you think Kennie might be into child
porn Greg?

>
> I'm guessing not.
>
> But then again, you've never explained what you think
> Ken did to be investigated by the IC3 division.

I have a few ideas. One being based on his CV as " Moore" posted it
on his web site http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com. As an avid true crime
reader Kennie's C.V. raised a few red flags for me regarding his
specific area of " study". Frankly I think his area of "study" was a
cover for his sexual perversions, perversions I think he's kept to
this day. The way his " favorite" daughter turned out to be a porn
actress and a prostitute when she supposedly was so talented and
promising as a teenager is another red flag about Kennie and what he
REALLY did to her.

Here's a rough draft of the "You're so Gay" lyrics

( Sung to the tune of " You're So Vain" by Carley Simon)

You're so gay

Greg searches online obsessed with a straight man for his prey
His leer hiding behind his computer screen
Thinking no one sees him as gay.

He has one eye on his cybstalking files " I ( heart)Kent"
while he dreams of being Kent's lover
dreams of being Kent's lover and....

You're so gay, you probably jack off about him
You're so gay, I'll bet you would wear his underwear
Won't you won't you?

You found him several years ago while excusing your abuse
You thought you found his criminal record
And your hidden gay ran loose
But your stalking was bad and straight Kent thinks you lost a few
screws
You are left alone, you are obsession's bitch.
Obsessions bitch, and...

You're so gay, you probably jack off about him
You're so gay, I'll bet you would wear his underwear
Won't you won't you?

When you could have met Kent, your love, face to face, you naturally
hid.
Afraid he would hate you, a child molester.
So all that day nothing is what you did.
And where are you all this time?
Why online jacking off about Kent
Jacking off about Kent,and...

You're so gay, so gay
you probably jack off about him
You're so gay, I'll bet you would wear his underwear
Won't you won't you?

Like I said, rough draft. But most of it seems to fit.

Moe
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com


Greegor

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 4:27:34 AM7/21/09
to
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/browse_frm/thread/2ff7bed4c74b0817

G > Dan, I can't speak for Ken,

Moe > And yet Ken uses you as his puppet.

That you see it that way must chap your hide.

Moe > You repeat what Kennie says and in at
Moe > least one case you were sloppy enough
Moe > to C&P what Kennie must have sent
Moe > you,complete with Kennie's misspellings.

Fiction.

Moe > He can read it the same way I can.
Moe > his excuse that Verozon doesn't let
Moe > him read ALT groups is bullshit.
Moe > Verizon is an internet carrier, not a
Moe > newsreader. He laos crossposts

Laos?

Moe > TO alt groups, which he shouldn't be
Moe > able to do if his claims about
Moe > Verizon are true.

G > Did the IC3 section handle the investigation of Charlie Sheen?
G > There is another UNIT of the FBI that handles kid porn.

Moe > And you would know that why Greg?

Do you read a newspaper?

Moe > Have an interest in child porn greggie?

No.

Moe > Is that why you are sucking to to Kennie?

Nah, but you got so excited you stuttered.

G > I'm not sure whether they'd need IC3's help or not.

Moe > You're "not sure"? Oh really? So you
Moe > think Kennie might be into child porn Greg?

Nah.

G > I'm guessing not.

G > But then again, you've never explained what you think
G > Ken did to be investigated by the IC3 division.

Moe > I have a few ideas. One being based on his
Moe > CV as " Moore" posted it on his web site

So you think that the FBI will be interested
in a resume which Dave shouldn't have and
that Ken disavows as a fake, which is posted
on Dave's hate site?

Why would the FBI investigate Ken for that?

Do you think they want to dig into the THOUSANDS
of government employees got their JOBS or
promotions using Shaftsbury and similar diplomas?
The ones who used them for promotions got
them paid for by taxpayers, by the way.

I'm just suggesting that if you do talk to an FBI
agent about what you consider to be the crime
of the century, you might want to make sure
the agent didn't get HIS degree from
Shaftsbury or similar.

Check out the chain of command in fact.

No wait, the Federal Judge ordered the
huge list of Federal and state employees
who did that to be made secret!

What to do, what to do?

Moe > As an avid true crime reader

ROFL

Moe > Kennie's C.V. raised a few red flags
Moe > for me regarding his specific area of
Moe > " study". Frankly I think his area of "study"
Moe > was a cover for his sexual perversions,
Moe > perversions I think he's kept to this day.

Do you think these damned lies don't prove
what a complete bitch you are?
You hate Ken. I get it. But when your
lame ass arguments fail to win for you, you
resort to flat out lies. That tends to be
the only tactic you have left.

Moe > The way his " favorite" daughter
Moe > turned out to be a porn actress and
Moe > a prostitute

Where'd the prostitute thing come from?
It seems like the claims just morph to suit your mood.

Moe > when she supposedly was so talented and
Moe > promising as a teenager is another red flag
Moe > about Kennie and what he REALLY did to her.

I get that you hate Ken.
Has this stuff where you attack his (supposed)
family really made friends for you?

Or did you think that the bunches of Dave's
sock identities rooting for you were real people?

Please continue your attempts to insult me
with the use of gay as an epithet.

It's making you new friends.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 4:45:57 AM7/21/09
to

Greegor

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 5:09:26 AM7/21/09
to
DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
DS > child porn because of an allegation by
DS > Denise Richards.
DS > During the investigation the FBI took
DS > possession of Sheen's personal
DS > computer.

So what you're saying is that a false claim to
the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?

That even if you know it's false you can cause
lots of harm by instigating false reports?

You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!

krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:05:47 AM7/21/09
to

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f0cb466-ff14-4052...@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?


I wonder - did they FIND kiddie porn on Sheen's computer? Dan should
realize that HE is not Denise Richards.


krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:07:11 AM7/21/09
to

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5956fe5-e622-4e76...@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/browse_frm/thread/2ff7bed4c74b0817

Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...

On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> allegation by Denise Richards.
>
> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computer.
>
> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> and the
> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> agencies for possible investigation.


GH> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he can
read it.

Because Dan Sullivan is "CHICKEN SHIT!"

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:12:55 AM7/21/09
to
The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
allegation by Denise Richards.

During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computer.

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:8f0cb466-ff14-4052...@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...


> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?

No.

ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to be
"solid documentation of a CRIME."

Obviously pamgborn was lying.

> That even if you know it's false you can cause
> lots of harm by instigating false reports?

I'm not instigating fale reports.

> You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!

YOU'RE the manly man who was twice convicted for abusing a mentally ill
woman, grag.

And YOU'RE the manly man who is listed on the Iowa State Child Abuse
Registry, grag.

How PROUD are you?


Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:14:18 AM7/21/09
to

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:zjh9m.562$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

ken can read all my posts.


Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:17:21 AM7/21/09
to

Greegor

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:33:23 AM7/21/09
to
DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
DS > child porn because of an allegation by
DS > Denise Richards.
DS > During the investigation the FBI took
DS > possession of Sheen's personal
DS > computer.

G > So what you're saying is that a false claim to
G > the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?

KRP > I wonder  - did they FIND kiddie porn on Sheen's
KRP > computer? Dan should realize that HE is
KRP > not Denise Richards.

G > That even if you know it's false you can cause
G > lots of harm by instigating false reports?
G >
G > You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!

Dan's a MANLY man!

krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:35:55 AM7/21/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...


>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
>> DS > Denise Richards.
>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
>> DS > computer.
>>
>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?

> No.
>
> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to be
> "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.

Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying. As far as I
know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child pornography. YOU made
that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE CUSTODY
FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn) which
went NOWHERE.

>> That even if you know it's false you can cause
>> lots of harm by instigating false reports?

> I'm not instigating fale reports.

You sure as shit are TRYING.I don't know about "FALE" reports, but you
sre are typing to instigate people into making FALSE reports.

krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:38:34 AM7/21/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a65a312$0$31280$607e...@cv.net...

Not the ones you HIDE like the COWARD you ARE, Danny.

krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:40:24 AM7/21/09
to

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:59e55053-6f6a-4710...@k1g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...

DJS> Dan's a MANLY man!

Dan Sullivan is a GIRLYMAN!

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:44:55 AM7/21/09
to

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:vKh9m.572$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
>>> DS > Denise Richards.
>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
>>> DS > computer.
>>>
>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
>> No.
>>
>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to
>> be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.

"Laying?"

> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
> pornography.

As far as you know?

Hilarious.

> YOU made that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE
> CUSTODY FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn)
> which went NOWHERE.

The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks.

>>> That even if you know it's false you can cause
>>> lots of harm by instigating false reports?
>
>> I'm not instigating fale reports.
>
> You sure as shit are TRYING.I don't know about "FALE" reports, but you
> sre are typing to instigate people into making FALSE reports.

I'm not instigating false reports.


krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 7:51:50 AM7/21/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a65aa3e$0$31262$607e...@cv.net...

>
> "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:vKh9m.572$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>>
>> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>>
>>
>>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
>>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
>>>> DS > Denise Richards.
>>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
>>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
>>>> DS > computer.
>>>>
>>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
>>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to
>>> be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>>
>> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
>
> "Laying?"
>
>> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
>> pornography.
>
> As far as you know?

Danny - have you EVER heard anyone refer to it as "HOLLYWIERD?" Denise only
accused Sheen of having PORN. The Child Porn and the FBI are Sheen's
DRAMATIZATIONS.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 8:11:12 AM7/21/09
to

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:qZh9m.578$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an accusation
of child porn by Denise Richards..


krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 12:14:54 PM7/21/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a65b068$0$31269$607e...@cv.net...

>>>>
>>>>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
>>>>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
>>>>>> DS > Denise Richards.
>>>>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
>>>>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
>>>>>> DS > computer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
>>>>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have
>>>>> to be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>>>>
>>>> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
>>>
>>> "Laying?"
>>>
>>>> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
>>>> pornography.
>>>
>>> As far as you know?
>>
>> Danny - have you EVER heard anyone refer to it as "HOLLYWIERD?" Denise
>> only accused Sheen of having PORN. The Child Porn and the FBI are Sheen's
>> DRAMATIZATIONS.
>
> The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..


According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS. Danny, how SLOW
do you have to be to BELIEVE, hook, line and sinker, a Hollywood Press
Agent's BULLSHIT without question? Does it DAWN on you that the FBI never
CONFIRMED the story??????? Ya just ain't the brightest bulb in the box,
Danny!

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 12:35:59 PM7/21/09
to
The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
accusation of child porn by Denise Richards.

On Jul 21, 12:14 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message


>
> news:4a65b068$0$31269$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>>>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> >>>>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> >>>>>> DS > Denise Richards.
> >>>>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> >>>>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> >>>>>> DS > computer.
>
> >>>>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> >>>>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> >>>>> No.
>
> >>>>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have
> >>>>> to be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> >>>>    Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
>
> >>> "Laying?"
>
> >>>> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
> >>>> pornography.
>
> >>> As far as you know?
>
> >> Danny - have you EVER heard anyone refer to it as "HOLLYWIERD?"  Denise
> >> only accused Sheen of having PORN. The Child Porn and the FBI are Sheen's
> >> DRAMATIZATIONS.
>
> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>
>     According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.

And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
computers for two weeks?

> Danny, how SLOW
> do you have to be to BELIEVE, hook, line and sinker, a Hollywood Press
> Agent's BULLSHIT without question?

What benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
computers for two weeks?

> Does it DAWN on you that the FBI never
> CONFIRMED the story??????? >

Does the FBI confirm ongoing or past investigations, kenny boy?

Non scrivetemi

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 1:46:55 PM7/21/09
to
In article <2Ql9m.616$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
>

Flush!

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 1:59:28 PM7/21/09
to
The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
accusation of child porn by Denise Richards.

On Jul 21, 12:14 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 2:20:38 PM7/21/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:fe6d89e9-14b3-44c5...@e4g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...

> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>
> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.

DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
DJS> computers for two weeks?

Does it EVER occur to you that;

a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?

b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals hasn't
been ringing off the hook lately.)

c. He's pissed at Denise!

But THAT weoulds redquire a findtioning BRAIN/

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 2:45:51 PM7/21/09
to
The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an accusation
of child porn by Denise Richards.

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WFn9m.640$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...


>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:fe6d89e9-14b3-44c5...@e4g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
>> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>>
>> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
>
> DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
> DJS> computers for two weeks?
>
> Does it EVER occur to you that;
>
> a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?

You think that's a reason for Charlie Sheen to announce that the FBI is
going thru his computers looking for child porn?

> b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals hasn't
> been ringing off the hook lately.)

Charlie Sheen is in the top 10 highest paid TV Stars.

7.7 million a year.

> c. He's pissed at Denise!

That doesn't show he's pissed at Denise.

That shows WHY he's pissed at Denise.

> But THAT weoulds redquire a findtioning BRAIN/

A functioning brain know how to spell, kenny boy.


krp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 3:46:11 PM7/21/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a660ce9$0$31267$607e...@cv.net...

>>> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
>>> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>>>
>>> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
>>
>> DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
>> DJS> computers for two weeks?
>>
>> Does it EVER occur to you that;
>>
>> a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?

> You think that's a reason for Charlie Sheen to announce that the FBI is
> going thru his computers looking for child porn?

Pretty much, yeah!

>> b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals
>> hasn't been ringing off the hook lately.)

> Charlie Sheen is in the top 10 highest paid TV Stars.

When was his last MAJOR film?

DJS> 7.7 million a year.

>> c. He's pissed at Denise!

> That doesn't show he's pissed at Denise.
> That shows WHY he's pissed at Denise.

It would if his story were true. How come you can't produce SQUAT from
the FBI?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 3:58:49 PM7/21/09
to
On Jul 21, 3:46 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

>
> news:4a660ce9$0$31267$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>> > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> >>> > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>
> >>> According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
>
> >> DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
> >> DJS> computers for two weeks?
>
> >>    Does it EVER occur to you that;
>
> >> a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?
> > You think that's a reason for Charlie Sheen to announce that the FBI is
> > going thru his computers looking for child porn?
>
>     Pretty much, yeah!

That's one of the more stupid statements you've made, kenny boy.

> >> b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals
> >> hasn't been ringing off the hook lately.)
> > Charlie Sheen is in the top 10 highest paid TV Stars.
>

> DJS>  7.7 million a year.
>
> When was his last MAJOR film?

7.7 million a year for the TV show.

> >> c. He's pissed at Denise!
> > That doesn't show he's pissed at Denise.
> > That shows WHY he's pissed at Denise.
>
>     It would if his story were true. How come you can't produce SQUAT from
> the FBI?

Does the FBI comment on ongoing or past investigations, kenny boy?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 4:33:37 PM7/21/09
to

A few years ago Charlie Sheen was the highest paid actor on TV.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 6:27:36 PM7/21/09
to
Less than a year ago, http://www.reuters.com/article/televisionNews/idUSN0451456620080804

"Charlie Sheen, who plays a wealthy, womanizing bachelor on the top-
rated sitcom "Two and a Half Men," made more than any other TV actor
this year with earnings of $825,000 per episode, including money from
his ownership rights in the show.

At the rate of 23 episodes per year, the typical number of shows
broadcast each season for a comedy like "Two and a Half Men," Sheen
would be pocketing just under $20 million a year for a role that also
earned him three Emmy nominations."

Yeah, kenny boy, like you said, Charlie Sheen is a "drama queen,"
NOT!!!

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 6:31:57 PM7/21/09
to
On Jul 21, 7:35 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

>
> news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> >> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> >> DS > Denise Richards.
> >> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> >> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> >> DS > computer.
>
> >> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> >> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
> > No.
>
> > ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to be
> > "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
>     Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying. As far as I
> know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child pornography. YOU made
> that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE CUSTODY
> FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn) which
> went NOWHERE.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html

Looks like an accusation of child porn, kenny boy.

Would the FBI have taken Charlie Sheen's computers for adult porn?

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 6:34:01 PM7/21/09
to
On Jul 21, 3:27 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> G > Dan, I can't speak for Ken,
>
> Moe > And yet Ken uses you as his puppet.
>
> That you see it that way must chap your hide.
>
> Moe > You repeat what Kennie says and in at
> Moe > least one case you were sloppy enough
> Moe > to C&P what Kennie must have sent
> Moe > you,complete with Kennie's misspellings.
>
> Fiction.
>
> Moe > He can read it the same way I can.
> Moe > his excuse that Verozon doesn't let
> Moe > him read ALT groups is bullshit.
> Moe > Verizon is an internet carrier, not a
> Moe > newsreader. He laos crossposts
>
> Laos?
>
> Moe > TO alt groups, which he shouldn't be
> Moe > able to do if his claims about
> Moe > Verizon are true.
>
> G > Did the IC3 section handle the investigation of Charlie Sheen?
> G > There is another UNIT of the FBI that handles kid porn.
>
> Moe >  And you would know that why Greg?
>
> Do you read a newspaper?
>
> Moe >  Have an interest in child porn greggie?
>
> No.
>
> Moe >  Is that why you are sucking to to Kennie?
>
> Nah, but you got so excited you stuttered.
>
> G > I'm not sure whether they'd need IC3's help or not.
>
> Moe > You're "not sure"? Oh really? So you
> Moe > think Kennie might be into child porn Greg?
>
> Nah.
>
> G > I'm guessing not.
>
> G > But then again, you've never explained what you think
> G > Ken did to be investigated by the IC3 division.
>
> Moe > I have a few ideas. One being based on his
> Moe > CV as " Moore" posted it on his web site
>
> So you think that the FBI will be interested
> in a resume which Dave shouldn't have and
> that Ken disavows as a fake, which is posted
> on Dave's hate site?
>
> Why would the FBI investigate Ken for that?
>
> Do you think they want to dig into the THOUSANDS
> of government employees got their JOBS or
> promotions using Shaftsbury and similar diplomas?
> The ones who used them for promotions got
> them paid for by taxpayers, by the way.
>
> I'm just suggesting that if you do talk to an FBI
> agent about what you consider to be the crime
> of the century, you might want to make sure
> the agent didn't get HIS degree from
> Shaftsbury or similar.
>
> Check out the chain of command in fact.
>
> No wait, the Federal Judge ordered the
> huge list of Federal and state employees
> who did that to be made secret!
>
> What to do, what to do?
>
> Moe > As an avid true crime reader
>
> ROFL

Fact Greg.

>
> Moe > Kennie's C.V. raised a few red flags
> Moe > for me regarding his specific area of
> Moe > " study". Frankly I think his area of "study"
> Moe > was a cover for his sexual perversions,
> Moe > perversions I think he's kept to this day.
>
> Do you think these damned lies don't prove
> what a complete bitch you are?

Better a " bitch" than your cowed GF Lisa, Greg.

BTW has she gotten her daughter back yet?

I saw Kennie's CV , Greg. The " bitch: is in the details Kenniepoo
made up to pad his CV. Bear in mind he brags about being the founder
of the "men's rights" movement. How many times does a person have to
take the same subject matter for " study" Greg? And for a guy who
supposedly studied about sexual abuse, why is it the Kennie is so
wrong about rape victims and female victims of " domestic" violence"?

Kennie is a liar, plain and simple. He puff up his " credentials" but
when actually questioned, his details do not match actual experts
basic knowledge of the same subject. I made that quite clear when I
questioned him about his AF " service". Kennie made a number of basic
ERRORS that no one who had what he supposedly claimed he had would
have made.

And you, quite frankly are no better Greg. Your poor little me victim
act doesn't wash ( pardon the pun). There is a damn good reason why
Lisa's daughter is not reunited with her Because of you Greg. And was
it just coincidence that TWO women you were involved with developed
mental illnesses?

> You hate Ken.  I get it.  But when your
> lame ass arguments fail to win for you, you
> resort to flat out lies.  That tends to be
> the only tactic you have left.
>
> Moe > The way his " favorite" daughter
> Moe > turned out to be a porn actress and
> Moe > a prostitute
>
> Where'd the prostitute thing come from?
> It seems like the claims just morph to suit your mood.

What do you think porn actresses ARE Greg? Do you think that after
they get "old" they turn to,oh, I dunno, being a nurse to make a
living? Kennie's " talented" daughter performs sex acts for money.

>
> Moe > when she supposedly was so talented and
> Moe > promising as a teenager is another red flag
> Moe > about Kennie and what he REALLY did to her.
>
> I get that you hate Ken.
> Has this stuff where you attack his (supposed)
> family really made friends for you?

What do I care? And his " supposed family" greg? are you implying
that Ken never had wives or daughters, that he--- GASP!! ---LIED??

IF Kennie is telling the truth about his daughter being so talented
in the horse riding she was third in competition to the Olympics, then
even if she failed she should have gone onto non Olympic horse
riding. Unless something happened to her where she ended up the way
she is now. That's quite a fall Greg. A young woman with such promise
resorted to making a living ( such as it is) sucking dick and getting
it up the ass on film so males like you can jack off watching them.

If that was MY daughter, I would go through hell doing whatever I
could to get her OUT of that living hell. What did Kennie do? He
BRAGGED about her being in the "adult film industry".

This whole thing between you two and me is not about making friends,
greg. You whine about being the victim of CPS when you abused a seven
year old girl. Kennie rips off his clients, pretends he has expertise
he in fact does not have, and acts like a jerk online for more than a
decade. You can try your bad stalking attempts on me all you want and
Kennie cam call me whatever names that pops into his diseased mind.
The point is you two SHOW more than anyone can say, including me,
about what you two really are.

BTW who is Elaine?

Moe


>
> Or did you think that the bunches of Dave's
> sock identities rooting for you were real people?

As opposed to Kennie's socks he used a few years ago Greg, where he
pretended to be his own supporters?


>
> Please continue your attempts to insult me
> with the use of gay as an epithet.
>
> It's making you new friends.

Your obsession with Kent is too odd for a " straight: male greg. And
now that Kent is no longer posting as much as he used to you focus
your cyberstalking on me, with your usual scattergun half-assed
results.

BTW Greg, you DO know that cyberstalking is a crime, don't you?

http://www.cybertelecom.org/security/stalking.htm

Would you prefer I call you child rapist Greg? That would be more
accurate of what kind of slime you really are.

I used the " You're SO gay" lyrics as a joke on you Greg.
Apparently that upset you. Good.

Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 6:32:41 PM7/21/09
to

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 6:36:45 PM7/21/09
to
On Jul 21, 6:14 am, "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
> news:zjh9m.562$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:c5956fe5-e622-4e76...@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...

>
> > Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
> > have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
>
> > On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> >> allegation by Denise Richards.
>
> >> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> >> computer.
>
> >> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> >> and the
> >> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> >> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> >> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> >> agencies for possible investigation.
>
> > GH> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he can
> > read it.
>
> >    Because Dan Sullivan is "CHICKEN SHIT!"
>
> ken can read all my posts.

Yep, the same way I can. Kennie is just PRETENDING he can't read
certain usenet groups.

Assuming, OC, he hasn't FUBARed that crappy Windows Vista Mail
client he uses.

Moe
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 6:37:54 PM7/21/09
to
On Jul 21, 4:09 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> That even if you know it's false you can cause
> lots of harm by instigating false reports?
>
> You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!

How proud and manly were you when you abused Lisa's daughter Greg?

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 6:48:36 PM7/21/09
to
On Jul 21, 6:51 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

>
> news:4a65aa3e$0$31262$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >news:vKh9m.572$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> >> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

> >>news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>>> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> >>>> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> >>>> DS > Denise Richards.
> >>>> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> >>>> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> >>>> DS > computer.
>
> >>>> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> >>>> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> >>> No.
>
> >>> ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to
> >>> be "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> >>    Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying.
>
> > "Laying?"
>
> >> As far as I know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child
> >> pornography.
>
> > As far as you know?
>
> Danny - have you EVER heard anyone refer to it as "HOLLYWIERD?"

Yes. Michael Medved for one, who BTW was wrong about the " monogamy"
of penguins.

Just because they are in Hollywood does not automatically mean they
are " clean". Hanoi Jane Fonda, for example, was responsible for the
deaths of four air men because of what she did and she should have
been tried for treason. Her father and her brother were both great
actors. Conversely there have been a number of people in the motion
picture industry who were unjustly accused of things they in fact
never did. The Fatty Arbuckle case, for example. And OC the McCarthy
commie hunts. There is still a question whether or not George Reeve
actually shot himself or someone killed him.


> Denise only
> accused Sheen of having PORN. The Child Porn and the FBI are Sheen's
> DRAMATIZATIONS.

Why would Sheen "dramatize" having child porn on his computer? Seems
that would be self-destructive.

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 6:52:11 PM7/21/09
to
On Jul 21, 1:20 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

>
> news:fe6d89e9-14b3-44c5...@e4g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > The FBI had Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks because of an
> > > accusation of child porn by Denise Richards..
>
> > According to a PRESS STATEMENT from Sheen's PUBLICISTS.
>
> DJS> And what benefit is it for Charlie Sheen to admit the FBI had his
> DJS> computers for two weeks?
>
>     Does it EVER occur to you that;
>
> a. Charlie Sheen is a DRAMA QUEEN?
>
> b. That Charlie Sheen NEEDS publicity? (His phone for pucture deals hasn't
> been ringing off the hook lately.)

Hmn, a TV series comes to mind " Two and a Half Men".

"pucture"?

BTW how would YOU know if Sheen's phone is ringing about deals or not
Kennie?

Was your Santeria high priest consulting you?

You'd also might want to look at the IMDB before you post about an
actor.

Moe
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>

jerry warner

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 11:29:18 PM7/21/09
to
why dont you assholes - take this crap elsewhere?

Greegor wrote:

> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/browse_frm/thread/2ff7bed4c74b0817
>


> Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
> have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
>
> On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> > allegation by Denise Richards.
> >
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computer.
> >
> > The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> > and the
> > National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
> >
> > Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> > federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> > agencies for possible investigation.
>

> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he can
> read it.
>

> Did the IC3 section handle the investigation of Charlie Sheen?
>

> There is another UNIT of the FBI that handles kid porn.
>

> I'm not sure whether they'd need IC3's help or not.
>

> I'm guessing not.


>
> But then again, you've never explained what you think

Greegor

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 12:40:05 AM7/22/09
to

G > ROFL

Moe >  Fact Greg.

Hilarious.


Moe > Kennie's C.V. raised a few red flags
Moe > for me regarding his specific area of
Moe > " study". Frankly I think his area of "study"
Moe > was a cover for his sexual perversions,
Moe > perversions I think he's kept to this day.

G > Do you think these damned lies don't prove
G > what a complete bitch you are?

Moe >  Better a " bitch" than your cowed GF Lisa, Greg.
Moe >  BTW has she gotten her daughter back yet?

Moe >  I saw Kennie's CV , Greg.

You mean you saw Dave's version of Ken's CV.
You go to great trouble to gloss over the distinction.


> The " bitch: is in the details Kenniepoo
> made up to pad his CV. Bear in mind he brags about being the founder
> of the "men's rights" movement. How many times does a person have to
> take the same subject matter for " study"  Greg? And for a guy who
> supposedly studied about sexual abuse, why is it the Kennie is so
> wrong about rape victims and female victims of " domestic" violence"?
>
>  Kennie is a liar, plain and simple. He puff up his " credentials" but
> when actually questioned, his details do not match actual experts
> basic knowledge of the same subject. I made that quite clear when I
> questioned him about his AF " service". Kennie made a number of basic
> ERRORS that no one who had what he supposedly claimed he had would
> have made.

> And you, quite frankly are no better Greg. Your poor little me victim
> act doesn't wash ( pardon the pun). There is a damn good reason why
> Lisa's daughter is not reunited with her Because of you Greg. And was
> it just coincidence that TWO women you were involved with developed
> mental illnesses?

Technically incorrect on several points.

G > You hate Ken.  I get it.  But when your
G > lame ass arguments fail to win for you, you
G > resort to flat out lies.  That tends to be
G > the only tactic you have left.

Moe > The way his " favorite" daughter
Moe > turned out to be a porn actress and
Moe > a prostitute

G > Where'd the prostitute thing come from?
G > It seems like the claims just morph to suit your mood.

Moe > What do you think porn actresses ARE Greg? Do
Moe > you think that after they get "old" they turn to,oh,
Moe > I dunno, being a nurse to make a living?
Moe > Kennie's " talented" daughter performs sex acts for money.

So you think that a woman who gets paid BIG MONEY
to perform sex acts on camera would easily transition to
prostitution for a tiny portion of that amount?

I saw a story recently where a former porn star is in the PTA.

So this brain fart is really about what YOU think porn stars are.

You're an expert because you read "true crime" stories! LOL


Moe > when she supposedly was so talented and
Moe > promising as a teenager is another red flag
Moe > about Kennie and what he REALLY did to her.

> > I get that you hate Ken.
> > Has this stuff where you attack his (supposed)
> > family really made friends for you?

>  What do I care? And his " supposed family" greg? are you implying
> that Ken never had wives or daughters, that he--- GASP!! ---LIED??

>   IF Kennie is telling the truth about his daughter being so talented
> in the horse riding she was third in competition to the Olympics, then
> even if she failed she should have  gone onto non Olympic horse
> riding. Unless something happened to her where she ended up the way
> she is now. That's quite a fall Greg. A young woman with such promise
> resorted to making a living ( such as it is) sucking dick and getting
> it up the ass on film so males like you can jack off watching them.

Moe > If that was MY daughter, I would go through hell
Moe > doing whatever I could to get her OUT of that living hell.

Like what? Illegal acts? Conspiracy to violate civil rights?


Moe > What did Kennie do? He BRAGGED about
Moe > her being in the "adult film industry".

Got a LINK to that?

> This whole thing between you two and me is not about making friends,
> greg. You whine about being the victim of CPS when you abused a seven
> year old girl. Kennie rips off his clients, pretends he has expertise
> he in fact does not have, and acts like a jerk online for more than a
> decade.  You can try your bad stalking attempts on me all you want and
> Kennie cam call me whatever names that pops into his diseased mind.
> The point is you two SHOW more than anyone can say, including me,
> about what you two really are.

With the big chicken plant there I just have to ask
what kind of 'bird' does your aviator Dad fly?

Moe >  BTW who is Elaine?


G > Or did you think that the bunches of Dave's
G > sock identities rooting for you were real people?

Moe > As opposed to Kennie's socks he used
Moe > a few years ago Greg, where he
Moe > pretended to be his own supporters?

Got some LINKS?

I see you acknowledge Dave's activity currently
while still denying his past activities.

G > Please continue your attempts to insult me
G > with the use of gay as an epithet.
G > It's making you new friends.

Moe > Your obsession with Kent is too odd for a
Moe > " straight: male greg. And now that Kent is
Moe > no longer posting as much as he used to
Moe > you focus your cyberstalking on me, with
Moe > your usual scattergun half-assed results.

Moe > BTW Greg, you DO know that cyberstalking is a crime, don't you?

Press charges, Moe!

Moe > Would you prefer I call you child rapist Greg?

Any lie will do when you're in that mood.

Moe > That would be more
Moe > accurate of what kind of slime you really are.

When you get hostile, you will use any lie you think suits you.

Moe > I used the " You're SO gay" lyrics as a joke on you Greg.
Moe > Apparently that upset you. Good.

I get all the action I want at home.
You're not hurting my opportunities,
You do YOURSELF more harm with
this attempt to harm me.

You get yourself all worked up into a good hate.

You lie about my family's CPS experience because
it's convenient for insult to call me a child molester.

You posted what you thought was my street address
and what you thought was my phone number.

You called me gay.

Then you try griping that I am stalking you??

PLEASE press charges!

Greegor

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 12:51:08 AM7/22/09
to
DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
DS > child porn because of an allegation by
DS > Denise Richards.
DS > During the investigation the FBI took
DS > possession of Sheen's personal
DS > computer.

G > So what you're saying is that a false claim to
G > the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?

G > That even if you know it's false you can cause
G > lots of harm by instigating false reports?

G > You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!

Moe > How proud and manly were you when you
Moe > abused Lisa's daughter Greg?

Lies to distract again.
You overlook your tacit admission that
Dan's attempt to instigate false reports
to the FBI is a cowardly style, and
even somewhat effeminate.

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:43:34 AM7/22/09
to
On Jul 21, 11:40 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 5:34 pm, whitevamp <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 3:27 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> > > G > Dan, I can't speak for Ken,
>
> > > Moe > And yet Ken uses you as his puppet.
>
> > > That you see it that way must chap your hide.
>
> > > Moe > You repeat what Kennie says and in at
> > > Moe > least one case you were sloppy enough
> > > Moe > to C&P what Kennie must have sent
> > > Moe > you,complete with Kennie's misspellings.
>
> > > Fiction.
>
> > > Moe > He can read it the same way I can.
> > > Moe > his excuse that Verozon doesn't let
> > > Moe > him read ALT groups is bullshit.
> > > Moe > Verizon is an internet carrier, not a
> > > Moe > newsreader. He laos crossposts
>
> > > Laos?

Typo. " also"

Simple fact greggie. I forget how many true crime books I currently
have. I grew out of SF and fantasy fiction since college and
eventually I became a true crime reader. I still won't pass up a
Stephen King novel ( because he's a really good writer) and there is
one series of recent fantasy I have grown to like, but overall what I
read nowadays is true crime and my computer magazines. I OC read other
books and have a nice cookbook collection but the RELEVANT interest of
mine in regards to you and Kennie is the true crime stuff.

That's one reason when Kennie talked about rape victims and female
victims of " domestic" abuse, I KNEW he was lying from the get-go and
his response was his misogyny, not his " studies". He can call me "
feminazi" and " bitch" and whatever epithet he can come up with in his
diseased mind. It doesn't bother me one bit. I don't need Quantico
training to figure out what kind of person Kennie is. And you, for
that matter. I can figure out that when you " wiped the pee" off a
seven year old girl ( who was capable of cleaning herself) you were
deliberately testing her to see how far you can go with her when the
next opportunity came. There is a very good reason why your are in the
sexual abuse registry Greg.

Just as Kennie's " favorite daughter"changing from promising equine
rider of Olympic potential to ( sadly) porn actress looks suspicious.
And when Kennie blames his ex wife who supposedly put his favorite
daughter in " bad company", that sounded like a self-serving cop-out
covering up something.


>
> Moe > Kennie's C.V. raised a few red flags
> Moe > for me regarding his specific area of
> Moe > " study". Frankly I think his area of "study"
> Moe > was a cover for his sexual perversions,
> Moe > perversions I think he's kept to this day.
>
> G > Do you think these damned lies don't prove
> G > what a complete bitch you are?
>
> Moe >  Better a " bitch" than your cowed GF Lisa, Greg.
> Moe >  BTW has she gotten her daughter back yet?
>
> Moe >  I saw Kennie's CV , Greg.
>
> You mean you saw Dave's version of Ken's CV.
> You go to great trouble to gloss over the distinction.

The CV on th- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com web site you mean? Has
Kennie said any of the contents of that C.V. were wrong? Seems to me
that CV would be a benefit to Kennie, considering the contents.

Unless, OC, Kennie lied in the C.V. and " Moore" preserved the lies.

They get a TINY AMOUNT in the FIRST place Greg, you dumbass!! They
are lucky to get three thousand dollars TOPS per " performance". Most
get considerably less. And compared to the money the producers make,
they are being paid pennies.

There is this guy who is well known in the porn industry ( though IMO
he looks like crap) as a "performer" who spoke up some years ago about
how young women are conned into the porn industry as soon as they turn
legal age and the women don't have the savvy to negotiate or control
their " contracts".

>
> I saw a story recently where a former porn star is in the PTA.

Few women become porn STARS Greg. Many get used up.

>
> So this brain fart is really about what YOU think porn stars are.

Not just me Greg. I also didn't specifically mention porn STARS. I
meant women IN video porn. You deliberately are trying to steer the
subject to what you want.

>
> You're an expert because you read "true crime" stories!  LOL

I am not claiming to be an expert. That is your master Kennie's
little trick he uses when he gets desperate.

I know some about the women taken advantaged of by the porn industry
because I found out sources FROM the victims who spoke out. TV such
as the FreeSpeech channel can be quite informative.

>
> Moe > when she supposedly was so talented and

> Moe > promising as a teenager is another red flag
> Moe > about Kennie and what he REALLY did to her.
>
> > > I get that you hate Ken.
> > > Has this stuff where you attack his (supposed)
> > > family really made friends for you?
> >  What do I care? And his " supposed family" greg? are you implying
> > that Ken never had wives or daughters, that he--- GASP!! ---LIED??
> >   IF Kennie is telling the truth about his daughter being so talented
> > in the horse riding she was third in competition to the Olympics, then
> > even if she failed she should have  gone onto non Olympic horse
> > riding. Unless something happened to her where she ended up the way
> > she is now. That's quite a fall Greg. A young woman with such promise
> > resorted to making a living ( such as it is) sucking dick and getting
> > it up the ass on film so males like you can jack off watching them.
>
> Moe > If that was MY daughter, I would go through hell
> Moe > doing whatever I could to get her OUT of that living hell.
>
> Like what?  Illegal acts?  Conspiracy to violate civil rights?

Save her from AIDS, for one.

>
> Moe > What did Kennie do? He BRAGGED about
> Moe > her being in the "adult film industry".
>
> Got a LINK to that?
>
> > This whole thing between you two and me is not about making friends,
> > greg. You whine about being the victim of CPS when you abused a seven
> > year old girl. Kennie rips off his clients, pretends he has expertise
> > he in fact does not have, and acts like a jerk online for more than a
> > decade.  You can try your bad stalking attempts on me all you want and
> > Kennie cam call me whatever names that pops into his diseased mind.
> > The point is you two SHOW more than anyone can say, including me,
> > about what you two really are.
>
> With the big chicken plant there I just have to ask
> what kind of 'bird' does your aviator Dad fly?

(( rolls eyes))


>
> Moe >  BTW who is Elaine?
>
> G > Or did you think that the bunches of Dave's
> G > sock identities rooting for you were real people?
>
> Moe > As opposed to Kennie's socks he used
> Moe > a few years ago Greg, where he
> Moe > pretended to be his own supporters?
>
> Got some LINKS?

Now that you mention it......

http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com

>
> I see you acknowledge Dave's activity currently
> while still denying his past activities.

He has a web site that Kennie can't shut down because it is the truth
about Kennie. Whatever else Kennie CLAIMS he's done is for Kennie to
prove. And I haven't seen anything to prove Kennie's claims about
Moore.

If you have proof, feel free to show it.

>
> G > Please continue your attempts to insult me
> G > with the use of gay as an epithet.
> G > It's making you new friends.
>
> Moe > Your obsession with Kent is too odd for a
> Moe > " straight: male greg. And now that Kent is
> Moe > no longer posting as much as he used to
> Moe > you focus your cyberstalking on me, with
> Moe > your usual scattergun half-assed results.
>
> Moe > BTW Greg, you DO know that cyberstalking is a crime, don't you?
>
> Press charges, Moe!

Are you admitting you are committing the crime greg?

>
> Moe > Would you prefer I call you child rapist Greg?
>
> Any lie will do when you're in that mood.

I'm not Kennie.

>
> Moe > That would be more
> Moe > accurate of what kind of slime you really are.
>
> When you get hostile, you will use any lie you think suits you.

Projection noted.

>
> Moe > I used the " You're SO gay" lyrics as a joke on you Greg.
> Moe > Apparently that upset you. Good.
>
> I get all the action I want at home.

Gee, anything I could say to that would be moot.....

> You're not hurting my opportunities,
> You do YOURSELF more harm with
> this attempt to harm me.

Projection noted. BTW you are not " harming" me by your
cyberstalking, faulty as it is.

I am eager to see if you found if I won Publisher's Clearinghouse
yet.

Your PeopleFinders searches panning out? That's where you got the "
Elaine" one.

>
> You get yourself all worked up into a good hate.

You haven't seen me " worked up" Greg. Your master Kennie calls me a
psycho. Ever think I might actually be one?

>
> You lie about my family's CPS experience because
> it's convenient for insult to call me a child molester.

Because you are one, Greg. You also abused some of the women in your
life. That hardly speaks well for you. So far I haven't seen anything
from you worthy of praise.


>
> You posted what you thought was my street address
> and what you thought was my phone number.
>
> You called me gay.

You obsessed about Kent. Now that he isn't there you obsess about me.
May I presume that if you aren't gay your interest in me is ( ugh)
sexual?

I made fun of your obsession over a GUY online using improvised song
lyrics. So much effort and attention over a guy does make one question
what your sexual orientation actually is.

If you're gay, fine. If you're straight fine. But your name is on the
sexual abuser registry. For good reason. I have no respect whatsoever
for child molesters and child abusers. For whatever reason why Lisa
won't take the steps to get her daughter back, it is YOU who is her
biggest obstacle to reunite with her daughter. Had you the caring
attitude Kennie CLAIMS he has for HIS daughters, you would take steps
yourself to aid Lisa in reuniting with her daughter before the
separation becomes unfixable. But you won't.

Long story short Greg, I know far more than you think. Your ' game"
is not working.

Moe
Know your scum---http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com

krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 2:28:51 AM7/22/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:2bab3ad8-991a-424a...@d34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...

> Less than a year ago,
> http://www.reuters.com/article/televisionNews/idUSN0451456620080804
>
> "Charlie Sheen, who plays a wealthy, womanizing bachelor on the top-
> rated sitcom "Two and a Half Men," made more than any other TV actor
> this year with earnings of $825,000 per episode, including money from
> his ownership rights in the show.
>
> At the rate of 23 episodes per year, the typical number of shows
> broadcast each season for a comedy like "Two and a Half Men," Sheen
> would be pocketing just under $20 million a year for a role that also
> earned him three Emmy nominations."
>
Since then - DIVORCE - and WHAT work?

krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 2:34:48 AM7/22/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:e84bc5e5-ac88-420f...@p28g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...

On Jul 21, 7:35 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a65a2be$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> >> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> >> DS > Denise Richards.
> >> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> >> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> >> DS > computer.
>
> >> So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> >> the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
> > No.
>
> > ken pangborn claimed that any reports made to the FBI about him have to
> > be
> > "solid documentation of a CRIME."> Obviously pamgborn was lying.
>
> Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying. As far as I
> know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child pornography. YOU made
> that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE CUSTODY
> FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn) which
> went NOWHERE.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html

DJS> Looks like an accusation of child porn, kenny boy.

In YOUR mind "Very young women" translates to KIDDIE PORN. Some 30 year
old women LOOK very young, Danny.

DJS> Would the FBI have taken Charlie Sheen's computers for adult porn?

No PROOF that they did, other than Sheen's publicists claims.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 6:30:20 AM7/22/09
to

Then why did the FBI have Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 6:36:15 AM7/22/09
to
The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
allegation by Denise Richards.

During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for three weeks.

On Jul 22, 12:51 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Moe > How proud and manly were you when you
> Moe > abused Lisa's daughter Greg?
>
> Lies to distract again.

You've been on the Iowa State Child Abuse Registry since 2001, grag.

> You overlook your tacit admission that
> Dan's attempt to instigate false reports
> to the FBI is a cowardly style,

I never suggested anyone file a false report.

The real reports will suffice.

> and even somewhat effeminate.

Hilarious!

You beat off to anything, grag.

krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 10:42:15 AM7/22/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:1d5454c9-bfee-41ed...@o7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...


> > Well if you are relying on the Sheen case YOU are laying. As far as I
> > know Sheen was NOT investigated by the FBI for child pornography. YOU
> > made
> > that up in typical Dan Sullivan fashion. The TRUTH is that IN THE
> > CUSTODY
> > FIGHT, Richards accused Sheen of having "pornography" (adult porn) which
> > went NOWHERE.
>
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
>
> DJS> Looks like an accusation of child porn, kenny boy.
>
> In YOUR mind "Very young women" translates to KIDDIE PORN.

DJS> Then why did the FBI have Charlie Sheen's computers for two weeks?


There is NO real evidence other than from Sheen's PRESS AGENT that they
did.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 11:19:15 AM7/22/09
to
The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..

During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for two weeks.

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:bzF9m.771$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn is
something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?

Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy porn,
is that your claim, kenny boy?


krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 11:37:04 AM7/22/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...


> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..

That's NOT accurate.

> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computers for two weeks.


So says Charlie Sheen's PUBLICIST, Danny. What does the FBI say??????

krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 11:41:43 AM7/22/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...

> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..

> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computers for two weeks.

> Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn is

> something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?

Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY! How much BULLSHIT was released by
Carole Lombard press agents? Humphrey Bogat's when he was BOINLING Lauren
Bacall while married to another woman?

> Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy
> porn, is that your claim, kenny boy?

1. Sheen IS a drama queen.

2. He is fighting with Richards who has been screwing him over.

3. Sheen MAY be suffering from Munchausen's syndrome.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 11:43:53 AM7/22/09
to
The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..

During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for two weeks.

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:AmG9m.530$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...


>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
>> allegation by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
>
> That's NOT accurate.
>
>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
>> computers for two weeks.
>>

>> Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn
>> is something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>>
>> Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy
>> porn, is that your claim, kenny boy?
>

> So says Charlie Sheen's PUBLICIST, Danny. What does the FBI say??????

I don't believe the FBI comments on their investigations, kenny boy, unless
an arrest was made.


krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 11:47:14 AM7/22/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a6733c2$0$10286$607e...@cv.net...

>> So says Charlie Sheen's PUBLICIST, Danny. What does the FBI say??????

> I don't believe the FBI comments on their investigations, kenny boy,
> unless an arrest was made.

That they "ALLEGEDLY" gave the computers back would indicate that the
file was CLOSED. IF there ever was one. The FBI, Danny, doesn't comment on
BULLSHIT!

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 11:58:51 AM7/22/09
to
The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
by Denise Richards in their divorce papers.

In a document submitted to court "under the penalty of perjury" Denise
Richards described the girls on the websites and underage, with pigtails and
braces engaging in oral sex.

During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for two weeks.

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:XqG9m.532$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...


>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...
>
>> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
>> allegation by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
>
>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
>> computers for two weeks.
>
>> Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn
>> is something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY! How much BULLSHIT was released
> by Carole Lombard press agents? Humphrey Bogat's when he was BOINLING
> Lauren Bacall while married to another woman?
>
>> Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy
>> porn, is that your claim, kenny boy?
>
> 1. Sheen IS a drama queen.

In your opinion, kenny boy.

> 2. He is fighting with Richards who has been screwing him over.

The divorce was final in November of 2006.

> 3. Sheen MAY be suffering from Munchausen's syndrome.

Charlie Sheen thinks he's ill, and he's not?

Is that your professional diagnosis as a psychologist with two "Cum Laude"
university degrees, kenny boy???


Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 12:04:07 PM7/22/09
to
The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
by Denise Richards in their divorce papers.

In a document submitted to court "under the penalty of perjury" Denise

Richards described the girls on the websites as underage, with pigtails and


braces engaging in oral sex.

During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
computers for two weeks.

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:6wG9m.536$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...


>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a6733c2$0$10286$607e...@cv.net...
>
>>> So says Charlie Sheen's PUBLICIST, Danny. What does the FBI say??????
>
>> I don't believe the FBI comments on their investigations, kenny boy,
>> unless an arrest was made.
>
> That they "ALLEGEDLY" gave the computers back would indicate that the
> file was CLOSED.

As I said, the FBI returned the computers in a few weeks.

I'm sure the FBI investigates many allegations that don't result in an
arrest.

> IF there ever was one. The FBI, Danny, doesn't comment on BULLSHIT!

Or investigations unless an arrest was made?


whitevamp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 2:19:48 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 21, 6:38 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a65a312$0$31280$607e...@cv.net...

>
>
>
>
>
> > "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >news:zjh9m.562$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> >> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:c5956fe5-e622-4e76...@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> >> Re: ken pangborn claims that any reports made to the FBI about him
> >> have to be "solid documentation of a CRIME," YET...
>
> >> On Jul 20, 7:42 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >>> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> >>> allegation by Denise Richards.

>
> >>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> >>> computer.
>
> >>> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> >>> and the
> >>> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> >>> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> >>> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> >>> agencies for possible investigation.
>
> >> GH> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he
> >> can read it.
>

> >>    Because Dan Sullivan is "CHICKEN SHIT!"
>
> > ken can read all my posts.
>
>  Not the ones you HIDE like the COWARD you ARE, Danny.

Question? How can anyone " hide" posts on usenet? Since Sullivan uses
one account for ALL HIS posts, certainly Kenniepoo can use teh same
service I use ( Google Groups) to see ALL of Sullivan's posts.

Kennie darling, do you need help figuring out how to actually use a
newsreader?

(( laughing))

Let's see there's Forte FreeAgent, there's Google.......

Kennie your " excuse" that Verizon doesn't let you read alt groups is
bullshit.

Why would Sullivan" hide" some of his posts when you through your
doggie grag can know they exist? Is your pretense of not being able to
read alt groups something you put up to hide your forged posts?

Wait, you were CAUGHT forging post in the alt.atheism group. A group
you supposedly can't read.

(( SIGH)) Kennie the liar again.

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 2:20:24 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 21, 6:40 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:59e55053-6f6a-4710...@k1g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> G > So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> G > the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> KRP > I wonder - did they FIND kiddie porn on Sheen's
> KRP > computer? Dan should realize that HE is
> KRP > not Denise Richards.

>
> G > That even if you know it's false you can cause
> G > lots of harm by instigating false reports?
> G >
> G > You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!
>
> DJS> Dan's a MANLY man!
>
>     Dan Sullivan is a GIRLYMAN!

Oh you mean a LADIES MAN?

He's that good looking?

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 2:35:10 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 22, 10:41 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

>
> news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...
>
> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> > by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computers for two weeks.
> > Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn is
> > something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
>     Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY!  

So were a number of leading male actors who married women. A gay
male can marry a woman, and in Hollywood it is a good cover to avoid
rumors of being gay. Also Teddie Haggard is gay and is still married
to HIS wife.

Since YOU have had some " bitter" divorces, may we assume YOU are
gay?


>How much BULLSHIT was released by
> Carole Lombard press agents? Humphrey Bogat's when he was BOINLING Lauren
> Bacall while married to another woman?

Nice avoidance Kenniepoo. The point is Sheen's press agent revealed
the FBI had his computers for two weeks investigation the allegation
of child porn. That would not work in Sheen's favor, would it, as far
as further job opportunities.

Why the sudden panic about child porn found in computers Kennie?

>
> > Charlie Sheen is paying them to publicize that he might be into kiddy
> > porn, is that your claim, kenny boy?
>
>     1. Sheen IS a drama queen.

According to you. Actually Tom Cruise is a drama queen.

>
>     2. He is fighting with Richards who has been screwing him over.

So his publicist reveals the kiddie porn on his computers bit? Golly
that will get him more acting jobs right Kennie?

>
>     3. Sheen MAY be suffering from Munchausen's syndrome.

According to whom? YOU?

(( Kennie rant mode on))

Are you now the GREAT EXPERT TEH AUTRORITE of MENTEL ILLNESSES now?
Where's your DEGREAS?? HUH HUH HUH HUH?????

(( kennie rant mode off))

krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 3:01:32 PM7/22/09
to

"whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ed47c930-cd4b-4bd3...@m11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

>
> >>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> >>> computer.
>
> >>> The IC3 is co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> >>> and the
> >>> National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).
>
> >>> Complaints filed via this website are processed and may be referred to
> >>> federal, state, local or international law enforcement or regulatory
> >>> agencies for possible investigation.
>
> >> GH> Dan, I can't speak for Ken, but then you didn't post this where he
> >> can read it.
>
> >> Because Dan Sullivan is "CHICKEN SHIT!"
>
> > ken can read all my posts.
>
> Not the ones you HIDE like the COWARD you ARE, Danny.

MOE> Question? How can anyone " hide" posts on usenet? Since Sullivan uses
MOE> one account for ALL HIS posts, certainly Kenniepoo can use teh same
MOE> service I use ( Google Groups) to see ALL of Sullivan's posts.

WHY must I change services to suit DANNY and an IDIOT like YOU?

krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 3:03:32 PM7/22/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a673744$0$10290$607e...@cv.net...

> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> by Denise Richards in their divorce papers.
>
> In a document submitted to court "under the penalty of perjury" Denise
> Richards described the girls on the websites and underage, with pigtails
> and braces engaging in oral sex.
>
> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> computers for two weeks.


In Richards statement they were "YOUNG WOMEN" she did NOT say children
OR "young girls" you are a LIAR. As to the FBI doing anything, the ONLY
source for that is Sheen's press release, and nothing from the FBI or ANY
law enforcement agency!!!! And, of course DAN SULLIVAN!'

krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 3:17:48 PM7/22/09
to

"whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2183e6ab-fb74-4aa0...@y19g2000yqy.googlegroups.com...

> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> > allegation
> > by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computers for two weeks.
> > Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn
> > is
> > something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY!

MOE> So were a number of leading male actors who married women.

Rock Hudson? Not to mention STARLETS like Barbara Stanwyck (MOMMIE
DEAREST). Greta Garbo? Marlena Dietrich? Maybe Kelly McGillis?

MOE> Since YOU have had some " bitter" divorces, may we assume YOU are gay?

Actually *I* didn't say my divorces were "bitter" but David Moore
claimed they were.

>How much BULLSHIT was released by Carole Lombard press agents? Humphrey

>Bogat's when he was BOINKING Lauren


> Bacall while married to another woman?

MOE> Nice avoidance Kenniepoo. The point is Sheen's press agent revealed
MOE> the FBI had his computers for two weeks investigation the allegation
MOE> of child porn. That would not work in Sheen's favor, would it, as far
MOE> as further job opportunities.

So YOU and Sullivan claim. It sure got POOR PICKED ON Charlie Sheen lots
of sympathy.No real proof that any of the story was true. Great attention
seeking device.

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 3:41:20 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 22, 2:01 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

Bad excuse Kennie.

You were caught forging posts in the alt.atheism group, so you CAN
access alt groups.

Try some better lies Kennie. That one's not working.

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 3:43:17 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 22, 2:03 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

Got any links to prove your Kiennie?

Thought not.

As if you ever actually shown independent proof of your claims....

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 3:46:23 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 22, 2:17 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

You are the one mentioning Charlie Sheen, Kennie.

Why the hostility to Sheen? You seem really hateful of the guy for
some reason.

BTW Kennie, when your misspellings even show in your subject headers,
you might want to clam down and do some spell checking before you
post.

" Charlie Seen"?

(( laughing))

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 3:55:47 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 22, 2:17 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

>
> news:2183e6ab-fb74-4aa0...@y19g2000yqy.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
> > > allegation
> > > by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
> > > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > > computers for two weeks.
> > > Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn
> > > is
> > > something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> > Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> > agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> > from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY!
>
> MOE>  So were a number of leading male actors who married women.
>
>     Rock Hudson? Not to mention STARLETS like Barbara Stanwyck (MOMMIE
> DEAREST). Greta Garbo?  Marlena Dietrich? Maybe Kelly McGillis?
>

On the subject of actors and actresses who are gay.

So what? Its their performances which we as viewers pay to see, not
whether or not they are AC or DC.

Liberace was gay yet he was a damn good pianist.
Leonardo da Vinci is rumored to have been gay yet that doesn't
devalue his many masterpieces.

Jesus Christ may have been gay, assuming he existed as a real person.
But his teachings of love and compassion are good ones that sadly a
number of Christians don't practice.

Gay or straight or asexual, as long as it doesn't include harming
anyone, so what?

Would an excellent doctor be disqualified simply because they are
gay?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 4:19:50 PM7/22/09
to
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html

In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".

And "gay pornography" sites "involving very young men who also did not look
like adults."

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:8oJ9m.804$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...


>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a673744$0$10290$607e...@cv.net...
>
>> The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an
>> allegation by Denise Richards in their divorce papers.
>>
>> In a document submitted to court "under the penalty of perjury" Denise
>> Richards described the girls on the websites and underage, with pigtails
>> and braces engaging in oral sex.
>>
>> During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
>> computers for two weeks.
>
>
> In Richards statement they were "YOUNG WOMEN" she did NOT say children
> OR "young girls" you are a LIAR.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html

In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex with each other."

And "gay pornography" sites "involving very young men who also did not look
like adults."

krp

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 4:29:59 PM7/22/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a677470$0$31264$607e...@cv.net...

> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
>
> In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
> Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
> girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".

YOUNG WOMEN, Danny. Young WOMEN.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 4:31:53 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 22, 3:01 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

Suit yourself, buttface.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 4:38:20 PM7/22/09
to
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html

In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".

And "gay pornography" sites "involving very young men who also did not look
like adults."

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:bFK9m.558$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...

My quote of what Denise Richards claimed in her court papers is accurate and
true.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html

In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".

And "gay pornography" sites "involving very young men who also did not look
like adults."

George Orwell

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 5:30:28 PM7/22/09
to
krp wrote:

>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a672dfc$0$10326$607e...@cv.net...
>
> > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for child porn because of an allegation
> > by Denise Richards in their divorce papers..
>
> > During the investigation the FBI took possession of Sheen's personal
> > computers for two weeks.
>
> > Announcing that their client was investigated by the FBI for child porn is
> > something that all the best press agents would do, right, kenny boy?
>
> Don't know about "ALL" Danny. I have seen LOADS of BULLSHIT from press
> agents. Example - Raymond Burr's press agents spoke of his bitter divorces
> from several women. Raymond Burr was GAY!

So what? Hell's bells son, you yourself are a ball sniffing drama
queen pathetic loser excuse for a human being, and you still had a
wife for a while.

Of course now you're reduced to renting pussy, but then Burr had
money and success on his side and all you have is....

[crickets]

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

Greegor

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 7:40:29 PM7/22/09
to
Moe > Since YOU have had some " bitter" divorces,
Moe > may we assume YOU are gay?

For somebody who can't get a date with either
gender to complain about other people's
marital experiences is funny.

mmrpurdue

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 7:43:22 PM7/22/09
to

Nothing funny about you going to jail for beating your ex wife is
there greg? Maybe there is. Care to repost your advice to men as they
go off to jail or should I ?

Greegor

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 8:11:58 PM7/22/09
to
Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
Moe > simply because they are gay?

Would they? I don't think so.

What do you think about gay people
counseling hetero couples on marriage?

How about (supposedly) celibate priests
dispensing marital advice, Moe?

How about misfits who can't get a date
with either gender?

krp

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 4:45:51 AM7/23/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a6778c6$0$10316$607e...@cv.net...

> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html
>
> In a statement submitted to court under the penalty of perjury, Denise
> Richards claimed that Charlie Sheen frequented websites where "very young
> girls, who looked underage..." "performing oral sex on each other.".


She said "YOUNG WOMEN" Danny.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 7:27:38 AM7/23/09
to

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3rV9m.647$64...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...

kennny boy, all anyone has to do is read
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html and know you are
lying about what denise Richards claimed in the court papers.


whitevamp

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 4:13:11 PM7/23/09
to
On Jul 22, 6:40 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:

Proof?

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 4:14:36 PM7/23/09
to

How about males who beat up women and molest girls?

But then you know what I think about you.

Greegor

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 2:15:45 AM7/24/09
to
On Jul 21, 11:51 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> DS > The FBI investigated Charlie Sheen for
> DS > child porn because of an allegation by
> DS > Denise Richards.
> DS > During the investigation the FBI took
> DS > possession of Sheen's personal
> DS > computer.
>
> G > So what you're saying is that a false claim to
> G > the FBI can cause great harm, right Dan?
>
> G > That even if you know it's false you can cause
> G > lots of harm by instigating false reports?
>
> G > You're a proud and manly fellow aren't you, Dan!
>
> Moe > How proud and manly were you when you
> Moe > abused Lisa's daughter Greg?
>
> Lies to distract again.
> You overlook your tacit admission that
> Dan's attempt to instigate false reports
> to the FBI is a cowardly style, and
> even somewhat effeminate.

Dan?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 3:19:51 AM7/24/09
to
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:3rV9m.647$64...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...

> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

krp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 4:03:10 AM7/24/09
to

"whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4f7d3ea7-ca56-4b70...@h21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

On Jul 22, 7:11 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
> Moe > simply because they are gay?
>
> Would they? I don't think so.
>
> What do you think about gay people
> counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>
> How about (supposedly) celibate priests
> dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>
> How about misfits who can't get a date
> with either gender?

MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?

What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
them?

mmrpurdue

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 5:52:07 AM7/24/09
to
On Jul 24, 3:03 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

They should be court ordered to be your personal fat crack cleaner.

krp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 9:35:59 AM7/24/09
to

"mmrpurdue" <mmrp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:752cede9-5ece-4550...@m11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...


> > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
> > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>
> > Would they? I don't think so.
>
> > What do you think about gay people
> > counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>
> > How about (supposedly) celibate priests
> > dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>
> > How about misfits who can't get a date
> > with either gender?
>
> MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
>
> What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
> them?

DDM> They should be court ordered to be your personal fat crack cleaner.

Up to your typical blazing intellect, I see, Davey. WOW!


mmrpurdue

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 10:51:27 AM7/24/09
to
On Jul 24, 8:35 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "mmrpurdue" <mmrpur...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>     Up to your typical blazing intellect, I see, Davey. WOW!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It was as intectual as your comments about David's cum stream, WOW!

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 4:30:36 PM7/24/09
to

Are you mistaking yourself for Dan now?

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 4:36:21 PM7/24/09
to
On Jul 24, 3:03 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

And this is relevant to grag how?

Any female that " allows" her BF to molest her kids deserves serious
jail time. Any PARENT that beats up their kids deserves serious jail
time and lose custody of their children.

One bitch chose her abusive boyfriend who meat her up for years and
on his birthday demanded she' give" him her young daughter to molest.
The bitch held her down while the bastard raped her repeatedly. Now,
while she's serving some heavy time in prison ( which she richly
deserves) she's doing the crying and remorse act.

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 4:37:09 PM7/24/09
to

And clean up after his " accidents".

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 4:38:07 PM7/24/09
to
On Jul 24, 8:35 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "mmrpurdue" <mmrpur...@gmail.com> wrote in message

As opposed to your displays of " intellect" Kennie?

Pot,kettle.

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 4:39:32 PM7/24/09
to
On Jul 24, 3:36 pm, whitevamp <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 3:03 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:4f7d3ea7-ca56-4b70...@h21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jul 22, 7:11 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
> > > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>
> > > Would they? I don't think so.
>
> > > What do you think about gay people
> > > counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>
> > > How about (supposedly) celibate priests
> > > dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>
> > > How about misfits who can't get a date
> > > with either gender?
>
> > MOE>  How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
>
> >     What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
> > them?
>
>  And this is relevant to grag how?
>
>  Any female that " allows" her BF to molest her kids deserves serious
> jail time. Any PARENT that beats up their kids deserves serious jail
> time and lose custody of their children.
>
>  One bitch chose her abusive boyfriend who beat her up for years and

> on his birthday demanded she' give" him her  young daughter to molest.
> The bitch  held her down while the bastard raped her repeatedly. Now,
> while she's serving some heavy time in prison ( which she richly
> deserves) she's doing the crying and remorse act.

Typo corrected.
>
> Moe
> Know your scum---http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com

krp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 9:17:30 PM7/24/09
to

"whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:373a6ebf-868c-4878...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...

> > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
> > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>
> > Would they? I don't think so.
>
> > What do you think about gay people
> > counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>
> > How about (supposedly) celibate priests
> > dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>
> > How about misfits who can't get a date
> > with either gender?
>
> MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
>
> What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
> them?

MOE> Any female that " allows" her BF to molest her kids deserves serious
MOE> jail time. Any PARENT that beats up their kids deserves serious jail
MOE> time and lose custody of their children.


But not only is abuse of children by mothers MORE common, so are cases
where the mothers know that their BF's are molesting the kids and they look
the other way. You said what about men who beat up women and molest girls.
Ever see the movie "Hard Candy?"

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 10:16:41 PM7/24/09
to

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:K2tam.892$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...

>
> "whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:373a6ebf-868c-4878...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
>
>> > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
>> > Moe > simply because they are gay?
>>
>> > Would they? I don't think so.
>>
>> > What do you think about gay people
>> > counseling hetero couples on marriage?
>>
>> > How about (supposedly) celibate priests
>> > dispensing marital advice, Moe?
>>
>> > How about misfits who can't get a date
>> > with either gender?
>>
>> MOE> How about males who beat up women and molest girls?
>>
>> What about women who beat up kids and allow their boyfriend to molest
>> them?
>
> MOE> Any female that " allows" her BF to molest her kids deserves serious
> MOE> jail time. Any PARENT that beats up their kids deserves serious jail
> MOE> time and lose custody of their children.
>
>
> But not only is abuse of children by mothers MORE common,

More mothers abuse their children than the fathers.

> so are cases where the mothers know that their BF's are molesting the kids
> and they look the other way.

More mothers know their BF's are molesting their kids than fathers know
their BF's are molesting their kids.

What are the odds?

> You said what about men who beat up women and molest girls. Ever see the
> movie "Hard Candy?"

Ah, using a fictional situation to establish a fact.

That work well in court, kenny boy?

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 10:38:00 PM7/24/09
to
On Jul 24, 9:16 pm, "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
> news:K2tam.892$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

Agreed. Fictional movies are not reality Kennie. That's why they are
called FICTION.

There are more than enough factual cases of abuses to refer to, not
some damn movie.

Try some actual factual sources for once Kenniepoo.

Fiction is not fact nor reality.

krp

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 2:52:20 AM7/25/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a6a6b0b$0$22538$607e...@cv.net...


Was any of that supposed to make sense, Danny?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 8:25:50 AM7/25/09
to

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:EYxam.1157$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

What you said didn't make sense, kenny boy, that's why I made light of it.


krp

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 10:39:43 AM7/25/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a6af9d0$0$10305$607e...@cv.net...

>>> What are the odds?


Well Danny, do you know what that film was about? The story had a simple
answer to pedophiles.


Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 11:33:05 AM7/25/09
to

"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:POEam.949$646...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...

Is the movie NOT a work of fiction, kenny boy?


George Orwell

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 12:45:01 PM7/25/09
to
Dan Sullivan wrote:

> kennny boy, all anyone has to do is read
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.html and know you are
> lying about what denise Richards claimed in the court papers.


*laughing*

After all these years, and watching the scenario play out so many
times, even having joined the game myself once or twice... I *still*
love to watch Pigbarn get bent over the table and reamed. The guy's
such a total douchebag you can't help it! ;)

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

mmrpurdue

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 1:31:21 PM7/25/09
to
On Jul 25, 11:45 am, George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> Dan Sullivan wrote:
> > kennny boy, all anyone has to do is read
> >http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen12.htmland know you are

> > lying about what denise Richards claimed in the court papers.
>
> *laughing*
>
> After all these years, and watching the scenario play out so many
> times, even having joined the game myself once or twice... I *still*
> love to watch Pigbarn get bent over the table and reamed. The guy's
> such a total douchebag you can't help it! ;)
>
> Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
> non corrisponde ad un utente   |message is not related to a real
> reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
> di un sistema anonimizzatore   |anonymous system
> Per maggiori informazioni      |For more info
>                  https://www.mixmaster.it

Touché’ ****laughing***** along with you, as are all of us who
read his hysterical nonsense.

Non scrivetemi

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 2:02:03 PM7/25/09
to
krp wrote:

>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message

> news:2bab3ad8-991a-424a...@d34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
> > Less than a year ago,
> > http://www.reuters.com/article/televisionNews/idUSN0451456620080804
> >
> > "Charlie Sheen, who plays a wealthy, womanizing bachelor on the top-
> > rated sitcom "Two and a Half Men," made more than any other TV actor
> > this year with earnings of $825,000 per episode, including money from
> > his ownership rights in the show.
> >
> > At the rate of 23 episodes per year, the typical number of shows
> > broadcast each season for a comedy like "Two and a Half Men," Sheen
> > would be pocketing just under $20 million a year for a role that also
> > earned him three Emmy nominations."
> >
> Since then - DIVORCE - and WHAT work?

The guy works more in a day than you have your whole life, ya' lazy
slob.

>

Greegor

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 3:04:59 PM7/25/09
to
DS > Ah, using a fictional situation to establish a fact.

Fiction in court? CPS does that all the time, but
not dramatization.

On the other hand, CPS agencies used an NBC Movie
of the Week as training on Ritual Satanic Child Abuse.

Domestic Violence classes used movies and
dramatized "vignettes" as the basis for discussions.

I noticed that in a few cases they PRESUMED
some things about the hypothetical situation
without question.

In one vignette (dramatization) they depicted
a situation where the woman was basically
embezzling large amounts of family budget
and telling lots of LIES about what she was up to.

The instructors even blamed all of that
onto the man.

The verbally abusive man was the REASON the woman
was grabbing money and being devious.

It never occurred to the instructors that the woman
swiping the freakin RENT MONEY and telling
lots of LIES might have PRECIPITATED the
verbal abuse!

krp

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 4:11:43 PM7/25/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4a6b25b3$0$22519$607e...@cv.net...

>>>>>>> > Moe > Would an excellent doctor be disqualified
>>>>>>> > Moe > simply because they are gay?

>>>>>>>DJS > Would they? I don't think so.

>>>>> What are the odds?

You don't think incidents like that have happened in the real world,
Danny? Some states are mandating it upon a second conviction. Other states
(Louisiana) are giving the death penalty for pedophile repeat offenders or
cases where the child has been injured.

The FACTS here is that MOST child abuse is perpetrated in the homes of
single moms, to the level of more than 78% between her and her non-related
significant others. The # 1 perpetrator of physical abuse is MOTHERS.
Biological fathers account for the smallest group of offenders,

whitevamp

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 7:04:30 PM7/25/09
to
On Jul 25, 3:11 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

And where are your stats coming from Kennie? Your ass?

Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 25, 2009, 10:58:45 PM7/25/09
to
On Jul 25, 4:11 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

Incidents like what?

> Some states are mandating it upon a second conviction.

Mandated that the convicted perpetrator watch the movie?

> Other states
> (Louisiana) are giving the death penalty for pedophile repeat offenders or
> cases where the child has been injured.

Which states have executed people for molesting a child, and when were
they exectuted?

krp

unread,
Jul 26, 2009, 2:18:04 AM7/26/09
to

"whitevamp" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f5ce524b-7212-47b8...@e4g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...

MOE THE EXPERT> And where are your stats coming from Kennie? Your ass?

The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect reports. I have several
of them in PDF, Maureen. I KNOW you HATE MEN and need the perps to be all
MEN, it ain't so Maureen. It's women who abuse kids the most. Single moms.
Biological fathers are low on the statistical totem pole.


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages