Re: Bob Larson does drama queen act about "being attacked by Christians"

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 1, 4:14 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:51:33 -0800 (PST), kensmithiscool
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 29, 9:46 am, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 28, 1:46 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Feb 28, 10:50 am, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > On Feb 28, 4:12 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:06:03 -0800 (PST), KabukiBob
>
> >> > > > <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > [...]
>
> >> > > > >> >Quite frankly I am disappointed that AC360 would even consider having
> >> > > > >> >this old fraud on, seeing as they try to present their show as of a
> >> > > > >> >higher quality than, say Hannity or "Geraldo at Large" or other crappy
> >> > > > >> >shows. Guess Larson's publicity machine is oiled enough to fool what
> >> > > > >> >should be intelligent journalists.
>
> >> > > > >>      It's possible Anderson doesn't know about Lar$on's long list of
> >> > > > >> immoral actions.  It's not like Lar$on is a major player any more. Not
> >> > > > >> that he was ever really much of a major player.
>
> >> > > > >He may or may not. We'll know for sure after the show is aired--if it
> >> > > > >ever is.
>
> >> > > > >I am hoping there will be another guest on.
>
> >> > > >      I suppose I could set the tivo so that I can watch it later on,
> >> > > > but I just can't seem to get motivated to do so.
>
> >> > > Will this do?
>
> >> > > From Bob Larson's twitter account:
>
> >> > > $$$$$$$
>
> >> > > blarsonexorcist Bob Larson attacked by Christians on Anderson Cooper!
> >> > > #constantcontact conta.cc/wp4iWB 12 hours ago
> >> > > $$$$$$$$$$$
>
> >> > > I can see why KSIC tried the it's not AC360 bit on me. If this is true
> >> > > then McExorcist wouldn't want me to have some pleasure at seeing him
> >> > > get what he deserves on " major media."
>
> >> > No, it's Anderson.  Did you miss the announcement here?  http://goo.gl/YykDI
>
> >> > I hope you'll get the opportunity to watch the show.  I can't wait to
> >> > hear your thoughts.
>
> >> > God Bless
>
> >> I made the correction-- Bob-- yesterday.
>
> >> But thank you for your assistance.
>
> >> Also Bobbie, you might want to ask yourself this: when a certain
> >> critic of yours showed up, how did the " Anderson" folks know about
> >> him?
>
> >I'm sure Bobbie would tell you that there were no surprises :)  It's
> >gotta be flattering to BL that Mortal sees BL as his one and only
> >possibility to try and make a name for himself :)  In the industry, he
> >would be called an opportunist.
>
> >Does Mortal know you have a disdain for Mexicans?
>
>      What disdain?


Her flagrant contempt for gardeners named Jesus, of course. Are you
long past your medication's refill date?



> >What do you suppose
> >Anderson and his liberal base would think of anti-Mexican, Arkansas-
> >confederate racists like you, snowflake? :)
>
>      Your demon of lying is getting out of hand.
>      Seek the assistance of an exorcist.


You first, mama's boy. . .



> >I hope you get to see today's Anderson program .  This appearance is
> >opening even more doors and doing great things for the ministry!
>
>      Seems a bit early to make such a claim.  Clearly your demon of
> lying was in charge when you posted the article to which I am
> replying.


The great thing about media exposure is that no matter what, at the
end of the day it draws attention to the latest book, upcoming events
and last but certainly not least, the ministry. Keep up the
opposition. It's working! :)

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 2, 3:28 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:25:39 -0800 (PST), kensmithiscool

>
> <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >I'm sure Bobbie would tell you that there were no surprises :)  It's
> >> >gotta be flattering to BL that Mortal sees BL as his one and only
> >> >possibility to try and make a name for himself :)  In the industry, he
> >> >would be called an opportunist.
>
> >> >Does Mortal know you have a disdain for Mexicans?
>
> >>      What disdain?
>
> >Her flagrant contempt for gardeners named Jesus, of course.  Are you
> >long past your medication's refill date?
>

>      Whereas she's displayed no such contempt, your lie fails.


Okay, so you are long past your medication's refill date. I'll accept
that...

> >> >What do you suppose
> >> >Anderson and his liberal base would think of anti-Mexican, Arkansas-
> >> >confederate racists like you, snowflake? :)
>
> >>      Your demon of lying is getting out of hand.
> >>      Seek the assistance of an exorcist.
>
> >You first, mama's boy. . .
>

>      You're the one who keeps getting caught lying.


And yet you are incapable of producing evidence showing one single lie
from me. . .

> >The great thing about media exposure is that no matter what, at the
> >end of the day it draws attention to the latest book, upcoming events
> >and last but certainly not least, the ministry.  Keep up the
> >opposition.  It's working!  :)
>

>      Given how you, er, Lar$on has been reduced to exploiting his
> daughter and her friends to con people, I must disagree with your
> claim that it's working.


Since it is impossible to exploit the willing, I must disagree with
your claim that it isn't working. Do you have any remorse for
exploiting a teen boy to help you burglarize a garage in the dark of
the night?


>      Unless you mean my goal of ensuring as many people as possible
> know you, sorry, Bob is a fraud.  If that is your meaning (possible,
> though unlikely) then you would be correct.


Well, since you sleep 14+ hours a day and remain cooped up in your
parents rental property the remaining 10 hours of any given day, I
really can't see how it would be possible for you to get out there and
socialize to even entertain the notion that you could ensure that
people know BL. I'm sorry, but that just doesn't seem possible for
your particular living situation.

[Greegor]

KSIC > Do you have any remorse for exploiting a teen
KSIC > boy to help you burglarize a garage in the
KSIC > dark of the night?

On August 12th, 2003 Kent got caught using
SEAN MICHAEL BILYEU DOB 12/18/1985
as an accomplice to a felony garage burglary
05771 FECR176876.

KSIC > Well, since you sleep 14+ hours a day and
KSIC > remain cooped up in your parents rental property

I doubt that the SHACK that Kent lives in is
up to Alfred and Janet's standards for rental
property. It's an older slab shack in a
neighborhood that looks like all newer homes.

Photo of Kent's shack at 1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas
72756-5520
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=1110+South+F+Street,+Rogers,+Arkansas+72756-5520
In the PHOTO (left side) look for the RED CHAIR on the front
"stoop"! LOL

KSIC > the remaining 10 hours of any given day, I
KSIC > really can't see how it would be possible for you to get out
there and
KSIC > socialize to even entertain the notion that you could ensure
that
KSIC > people know BL.  I'm sorry, but that just doesn't seem possible
for
KSIC > your particular living situation.

http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/63269/photos/PHOTO_14204311_63269_25461334_ap.jpg

Kent claimed over and over to be Romani but
when asked what the stigma is about the
Kaldrashi tribe, Kent pled ignorance.

The truth is that any Romani would most
definately know of the stigma about
the ""black sheep"" Kalderashi tribe.

Kent further went on to express criticism
about the stigma that exists among Romani
about the Kalderashi tribe.

It's easy to figure out why Kent would deny
the very existance of the stigma and then
argue the wrongness of the stigma.

http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/63269/photos/PHOTO_14204311_63269_25461334_ap.jpg

Kent is the most famous garage burglary felon in the world.

Kent's appeal is so idiotic that it's amazing the
attorney who filed it was not disbarred.

The appeal did not argue the fact of the crime
but harsher sentencing because an attached
garage is considered residential burglary.

The really stupid part of this argument is that
black letter law specifically specifies the
sentencing guidelines for attached garages.

A competent attorney would have researched
and shepardized BEFORE taking the argument
to the APPEALS COURT and found that black
letter law made it a stupid idea.

Kent was actually sentenced to
TEN YEARS IN PRISON but apparently
some mental disability (like Aspergers)
convinced the Judge to put Kent into
a state run half way house and then
give him about 5 years of probation supervision.

The state run half way house involved
is housed in part of the old brick civil
war era barracks complex at old Fort
Des Moines.

Online, Kent has tried several rotating
forms of denial, some partly contradicting
the others.

He once claimed that the online records
of his crimes were faked on the official
web sites by some friend of his.

After it was pointed out just how serious
a crime it would be to forge/tamper with
official court records, Kent then claimed
that hs name is not Kent Bradley Wills
in the first place.

Kent overlooked that he had already acknowledged
his name when he claimed the records were faked.

Kent also tried denying his stay at Fort Des Moines,
pretending that Fort Des Moines was ONLY a museum.
There IS a museum on that huge Fort Des Moines
Campus but two or three of the huge old brick
civil war barracks buildings are used by the
Iowa department of Corrections.

http://www.fifthdcs.com/addresses.cfm?location=fort

Years before, Kent had attached himself to
the sale of an apartment building, apparently
not aware that tax assessor records would
reveal the names of his parents who really
sold the building, and the name of the buyer
who coincidentally had to SUE Kent for
unpaid rent a few years later. SWEENEY

So yes, the various official and public records
actually cross checked to fully ID Kent.

Carol and KentMoe are intent on smearing various
targets of their sociopathy and catharsis.



http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW


http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202............

[KabukiBob]

GOSH you're blowing a lotta smoke there McExorcist.

Too bad I know the real story, Bob.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

Are you admitting that you are in fact doing some exploiting, Bob?

First off, she's a teenager and you ARE in fact exploiting her, just
as you've been exploiting people for decades, Bob. Or are you going to
claim that the mental torture you put " Linda' through was by her
consent? How about ho you used Gabbie, Bob, for your UK show?

One CAN " exploit the willing." Its called grifting. Like the old
"found money" in an envelope scam, people can be fooled int going
along with people who use them.

Tell me Bob, would Brynne still be " willing" if she found out your
past, the stuff you've been trying to hide, including your sealed
divorce court record? Does she know where her name REALLY came from?

> Do you have any remorse for
> exploiting a teen boy to help you burglarize a garage in the dark of
> the night?

How's your remorse, Bob, when you tried a Newt Gingrich on your first
wife when you surprised her with the divorce request?

Oh wait, you don't have any remorse. Guess Ken Smith is right in
seeing you as a psychopath.

Aside from the blatant exploitation of a teenage girl and her ALLEGED
" friends" to sell yet another attempt for you to be on TV once again,
the problem of why would you allow a 13 year old girl to start
exorcisms when you claim exorcisms are dangerous is something that
even many of the Christians you are trying to con are wondering about.

I remember a Bible verse that goes in the "last days" people will be
lead away by false teachers, wolves in sheep's clothing who whisper in
their ear doctrines of demons.

Seeing as in your current scam a lot of what you ( a college drop-out
with mail order ministerial diploma)" teach" about demons is
unbiblical, I find your crass exploitation of the teen titty factor to
be a sign of your desperation.

You fear not being remembered after you die.

Ironic, that.

Moe

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 9, 4:28 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > I will say this, however. Your recent hissy fit and your lies
> about me
> Moe > have pushed my decision to do a little extra concerning you from
> the
> Moe > level of observer and commentator to something more direct.
>
> KSIC > Sounds awfully personal there, toodles.  I'm sure if BL ever
> caught
> KSIC > wind of that one, his legal counsel would have a field day with
> that
> KSIC > incriminating omen.  So much for your "observer and
> commentator"
> KSIC > whitewash.  :)
>
> Is she going to make some ....um some more calls to radio call in
> shows?


If sh-she d'd'does, sh-she'll have to l'l'l'lie to the c'c'c'all-
screener about who sh-sh-she is. http://youtu.be/Wr1ku07Eybo

:D

[Greegor]

Moe > I will say this, however. Your recent hissy fit and

Moe > your lies about me have pushed my decision to
Moe > do a little extra concerning you from the level of
Moe > observer and commentator to something more direct.

KSIC > Sounds awfully personal there, toodles.  I'm sure

KSIC > if BL ever caught wind of that one, his legal
KSIC > counsel would have a field day with that

KSIC >incriminating omen.  So much for your "observer

KSIC > and commentator" whitewash.  :)

G > Is she going to make some ....um some
G > more calls to radio call in shows?

KSIC > If sh-she d'd'does, sh-she'll have to l'l'l'lie
KSIC > to the c'c'c'all-screener about who sh-sh-she is.

http://youtu.be/Wr1ku07Eybo

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg

[KabukiBob]

I love your "Bob Larson Speaks Out" tape on here you read from your
book " Rock"' and stutter, Bob.

Is that "Christian" of you?

Moe

[Greegor]

http://popesnarkycriminal.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/clayton_mcgill.jpg

http://m111.photobucket.com/albumview/albums/popesnarky/Yahoo%20Photo%20Album/e589.jpg.html

http://m111.photobucket.com/albumview/albums/popesnarky/Yahoo%20Photo%20Album/RadioDazePic.jpg.html?o=2

http://www.canada411.ca/search/?stype=si&what=clayton+mcgill&where=Coquitlam%2C+BC&x=24&y=11


Level
Class Document
Reference Last Name, First Name Court Location Date Time Room Rsn Last
Rslt Agency File # View
""Speeding Ticket""
P,T AG12414009-1 MCGILL, CLAYTON Wade Clearwater Provincial Court
23Oct2001
10:00 AM 001 HR END 207:
""Open Bottle""
P,A 104746-1 MCGILL, CLAYTON Wade Surrey Provincial Court 29Jun1999
9:00 AM 001 OBC SEN 726:99045214
Document Count Offence Date Statute Nature Accused City Of Offence
104746-1 2 11-May-1999 CCC - 253(b) Operating vehicle/vessel with
over 80mg of alcohol Commit MCGILL, CLAYTON Wade Surrey BC
Document Name Access In Custody Year Of Birth
104746-1 MCGILL, CLAYTON Wade 1 N 1974

[The Demon of Mockery]

Hail Eris! On Mar 10, 1:13 pm, Kent Wills wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:00:50 -0800 (PST), Greegor wrote:
>
> >http://popesnarkycriminal.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/clayton_mcgill.jpg
>
>      Doesn't really look like the "Clayton" I know.  Aside from the
> one nose, one mouth and two eyes.
>      But then, in your drug addled mind, that's enough to make the
> claim, right Greg?

My middle name isn't "Wade"...

> >http://m111.photobucket.com/albumview/albums/popesnarky/Yahoo%20Photo...
>
> >http://m111.photobucket.com/albumview/albums/popesnarky/Yahoo%20Photo...
>
> >http://www.canada411.ca/search/?stype=si&what=clayton+mcgill&where=Co...
>
>      Here's your first clue that you're stalking the wrong man:
>      Our "Clayton" doesn't live in Canada.  In fact, 100% of the
> available evidence shows he's in the United States.

Clayton Wade McGill is actually known to you? Oh, wait, different CWM.

> >Level
> >Class Document
> >Reference Last Name, First Name Court Location Date Time Room Rsn Last
> >Rslt Agency File # View
> >""Speeding Ticket""
> >P,T AG12414009-1 MCGILL, CLAYTON Wade Clearwater Provincial Court
> >23Oct2001
> >10:00 AM 001 HR END 207:
> >""Open Bottle""
> >P,A 104746-1 MCGILL, CLAYTON Wade Surrey Provincial Court 29Jun1999
> >9:00 AM 001 OBC SEN 726:99045214
> >Document Count Offence Date Statute Nature Accused City Of Offence
> > 104746-1 2 11-May-1999 CCC - 253(b) Operating vehicle/vessel with
> >over 80mg of alcohol Commit MCGILL, CLAYTON Wade Surrey BC
> >Document Name Access In Custody Year Of Birth
> >104746-1 MCGILL, CLAYTON Wade 1 N 1974

Kl00: You're off by five years. I won't say in which direction. Also:
different middle initial.

>      Your additional PROOF that you think EVERYONE with the same first
> and last name are all the same person is noted.
>      Given that you've once again offered PROOF that you hold this
> delusion, please explain why you issued the following threat to your
> girlfriend:
>
>  "If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll
>  cripple you.  I may go to prison for it, but when I get out,  I'll be
> able to walk,  but  you will still be a cripple."
>   --Greg Hanson, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
>
>      Since, you PROVE once again that you believe everyone with the
> same first and last name are all the same person, you won't deny that
> you issued the threat.  To do so would mean you're position presented
> above was and is nothing more than a lie.
>
> [Cue Greg running away to HIDE, or attempting some means of
> distraction from the TRUTH I've presented about him]

He's really quite a k00k.

Snarky

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 9, 2:54 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 8, 9:26 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 5, 3:14 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > You aren't a Christian, Bob.
>
> > ... says the spirit of the anti-Christ.
>
> Says a human being who has observed you more or less since 1986.


Has it now become 1986? Up until now, you've said it was 1985. It's
now 2012, toodles, which means you're nearing 3 decades of obsessing
over BL.




> > Of course, Bob is a Christian! Galatians 2:20
>
> No you are not. To use Christian terminology, you are one of the
> false teachers leading people astray. You, Bob, are more about
> yourself than about "doing what Jesus did" as your misleading slogan
> claims.


BL is leading people to eternal salvation. BL is leading in the fight
in hope for the hurting. BL has led the fight for over 40 years
ministering to victims of demonic bondage. BL is leading the way as
an ambassador for Christ (2 Cor. 5:20). Your comments here Maureen
illustrate exactly what happens when demons take over and cloud the
mind and body.


> You are an apostate, a cult leader of your own personality cult and a
> crass exploiter of not only your daughter but of anyone you can use
> for money or self publicity.


And you are desperately reaching out right now seeking BL's love and
affection. You're a very twisted individual Maureen. Do you feel your
father exploited you, or were you willing?



> " renowned Christan author"? (( rolls eyes) Your ego showing again
> Bobbie


Of course BL is a renowned Christian authority. Why do you think BL
is still to this day looked to and sought by people all over the globe
(not just major media!) as the source, a one-stop for his expertise
on demons and exorcism from a Christian perspective :)




> I highly doubt you will ever reach your hyped height again.


Then you doubt in vain, toodles. BL has more widespread media
exposure today in the secular world than he ever did before. Are you
in denial or just plain asleep at the switch?




> As for your "salvation", Bob, does being "saved" give you license to
> lie, cheat, abuse, exploit, womanize and otherwise use people for your
> obsessive needs for notoriety and money?


Since BL has never lied, cheated, abused, womanized or use people for
any such purpose, the question is moot. Remember, those accusations
have ruined certain person's personal lives over the course of their
out-of-control vendetta, as there has never been any credible evidence
to prove those bogus claims when it came time to pay the piper :)



> > Your biblical ignorance is profound.
>
> Actually you rely upon the ignorance and gullibility of people who
> don't know the Bible and how you are a false teacher misleading them
> for your on greed.


That's news to me!



> I know enough to know what you are and are not Bob.


Spoken like a true stalker. You're too much of a coward to even show
up in person to a seminar or a rally or any public appearance of BL's
to tell him what you think of him. That is a cold hard fact,
toodles. . .



> > You have now wasted 27 years of your life that you will never get back
> > stalking Bob Larson,
>
> the amount of time I spent over the years observing your
> self-publicity, grandiosity and outrageous behavior is far less than
> what you assume. :-)


27 years is a very, very long time Maureen.



> I started my log books because


You're crazy...



> it was a personal study of an aberrant
> personality


It's a tangible, glaring piece of evidence illustrating your
sickness.



> Thank you for admitting you saw a counselor Bob. Now then, which
> mental or personality problems did you seek counseling for? Your
> biploar, your addiction to porn of a certain degenerate type, or
> something else you have done?



BL is bipolar and has an addiction to porn?? That's news to me. Only
a cracked-out mind could conjure up one of those zingers?



> > Your father Frank has urged you to seek professional help and
> > stick to it.
>
> Since when?


Since when?! Interesting choice of words. . .

> > Sounds awfully personal there, toodles.
>

> Not really. For too long I've been just gathering info and making
> comments online. I really haven't done much more than that, but my
> Anderson Cooper experience has convinced me that what I have been
> doing is rather weak, that there needs to be a central location for
> all things McExorcist. Press kits, that sort of thing.


O Please. Are you saying that you can outdo KS? Ha! As you know,
that crashed and burned and then some. :D

Sounds to me as if the crack has gotten the best of you. :(

> > I'm sure if BL ever caught

> > wind of that one, his legal counsel would have a field day with that

> > incriminating omen. So much for your "observer and commentator"

> > whitewash. :)
>
> His "legal counsel" doesn't seem to be too competent.


Well you are either being intentionally obtuse here, or you're far
more out of the loop than you'd care to admit. After that comment, I
now tend to believe it's the latter. . . :)

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:17:54 -0800 (PST), kensmithiscool
<kensmit...@gmail.com> wrote in
<f3e341e2-0e76-4cca...@gw9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>:

I'll need you to campaign a little harder, Bob. Don't pull an Obves on
me.

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 11, 1:17 am, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2:54 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 8, 9:26 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 5, 3:14 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > You aren't a Christian, Bob.
>
> > > ... says the spirit of the anti-Christ.
>
> >  Says a human being who has observed you more or less since 1986.
>
> Has it now become 1986?  Up until now, you've said it was 1985.  It's
> now 2012, toodles, which means you're nearing 3 decades of obsessing
> over BL.

Not obsession Bob. More like watch the nut job do his various scams
and attention seeking crap.

Your vain, ego-stroking claims otherwise, the simple truth is I spent
very little time regarding you over the years. But hey, everyone has
to have a hobby or two. :-)

I consider it much like being an accidental collector. You find
something of a certain type, bring it home, find another example of
that type, bring THAT home, and slowly but surely you find that
instead of an occasional object, you ended up with a collection.
That's what I see my approach to you, old man. An accumulation of
trivial facts about a trivial person.

You're still upset that the Anderson Cooper appearance brought out one
of your demons, the " demon of anger", right Gollum? And here I am
revealing that one of those that showed up, good ol Rev. Motal ( wink,
wink) was because of my recommendation.

I find it heartening that some of your victims are having the courage
to speak up about how you deceived them, ripped them off and cast them
aside.

How interesting that you can't stand being criticized at all, that you
go off in a rage when faced with examples of your greedy, sadistic
predation. You've been getting free passes in various media venues
for years.

Not anymore, Bob.

>
> > > Of course, Bob is a Christian!  Galatians 2:20
>
> >  No you are not. To use Christian terminology, you are one of the
> > false teachers leading people astray. You, Bob, are more about
> > yourself than about "doing what Jesus did"  as your misleading slogan
> > claims.
>
> BL is leading people to eternal salvation.

Hoo boy, here comes the "selling" spiel to con Christians....

BTW no mention of Jesus Christ in this " praise me" speech.

I know the truth about some of the behind the scenes stuff at BLM,
Bob. I know who really took the risks, went the extra mile at the "
compassion connection" scam of yours and it wasn't you.

> BL is leading in the fight

More like run away when confronted, you coward. And lying about
knowing of a person you and I BOTH know you knew from sight.

>
> in hope for the hurting.

More like preying UPON the hurting,the vunerable. Dashing their hopes
after you get what you want from them and leave them stranded.

C'mon Bob, your old lies don't work anymore. I know too much about
the real you and have seen your various scripted spewage for far too
long to be deceived by such self-praising nonsense. Particularly when
there are witnesses and testimonies to show your claims as lies. All
your lies and spins can't change the facts.

Gild your turd all you want , Bob. It's still a turd.

> BL has led the fight for over 40 years
> ministering to victims of demonic bondage.

Ehh, your boastings and the facts differ, Bob. To be more accurate,
you have been seeking "fame" for that long with your various
exploitations and attention seeking carney style cons and deceptions.

You don't' "minister". You exploit and abuse. And praise yourself in
the process.

In fact,I am proof of your BS claim of "ministering to victims of
demonic bondage" is your blowhard posturing and not reality. Your
claims as KSIC that I have demons and my challenge to you to meet in
Yahoo Chat, then on your challenge on Skype to prove I have "demons"
has resulted in you returning to your hiding mode, like the coward you
really are. Your responses to me on usenet as KSIC ( under your
various email addies and even some socks you used) were far from "
ministering".

Think about this Bob.if you actually believed your sell job about
yourself, then "bringing me to the lord" as Christians call it, would
be a triumph for you.

You DON'T do it because you know as well as I do you are a phony, a
vain, greedy egocentric grifter pretending to be Christian.

> BL is leading the way as
> an ambassador for Christ (2 Cor. 5:20).

Actually no. You have your own cult you made around yourself ( the
oxomoronicly named "Spiritual Freedom Church", which is in fact none
of the trio) and you actually DO nothing more than feed your ego and
run off with people's money after you scam them and use them for your
selfish purposes. There is not one unselfish, caring cell in your
body, Bob.

And praising yourself is very much NOT what Jesus Christ taught His
followers to behave. What other titles are you bestowing upon
yourself, you old college drop out, ministerial degree by Xian cracker
jack box, posturing little man?

> Your comments here Maureen
> illustrate exactly what happens when demons take over and cloud the
> mind and body.

Oh yes, more of that posturing act. But then your claims fall flat
when you back off contacting me to arrange for a Skype meeting to
prove I have the alleged demons and cast them out of me.

Money talks, Bullshit walks, Bob.

>
> >  You are an apostate, a cult leader of your own personality cult and a
> > crass exploiter of not only your daughter but of anyone you can use
> > for money or self publicity.
>
> And you are desperately reaching out right now seeking BL's love and
> affection.

Pardon me for a minute.....

BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

(( Wipes tears from eyes)) Goddesses,what an EGO you have there Bob!

Why would I want such things from a "man" I find repulsive? Do you
actually think that you are some sort of babe magnet, old man? Or that
you ever WERE? Your "womanizing", as Rev.Motal diplomatically put
it,while you were at Bob Larson Ministries was, according to the
stories I've heard, rather embarrassing to various employees and
showed your exaggerated self-image as opposed to how the women -- and
men-- there really saw you.

Also, how can you show " love" when you don't have the capacity to
actually feel it yourself, Bob? The accounts of your so-called love
interest with certain BLM staff members was, gee, how shall I put it,
"obsessive" like a stalker and very much one-sided.

The only "love" you show is for riches and for attention.

>You're a very twisted individual Maureen.

I'm not victimizing people, using them, mindfucking them, like you are
Bob.

>  Do you feel your
> father exploited you, or were you willing?

(( raises eyebrows))In what? Since when?

Oh I see. You are trying the crappy father projection dime store
psychology claim on me. Do you really think I see you as a projection
of my father? You, a college drop out, a chicken hawk who while as a
Christian during Nam never served a day in the military in his LIFE, a
guy who scammed and conned for his riches and his two mansions?

Dude, you are nowhere NEAR what my father was. I am proud of my
father and what he accomplished in his life, against odds that would
have made coward YOU crap in your pants.

There is no comparison, You lose.

>
> > " renowned Christan author"? (( rolls eyes) Your ego showing again
> > Bobbie
>
> Of course BL is a renowned Christian authority.

Ehh, not really. You SELL yourself as such but the facts are that its
more posturing than reality. Your radio show during the Solar Temple
cult suicides showed that you in fact didn't know what the name of the
cult was, much less their teachings-- and you had two hours on the air
to show your " knowledge".

But then Dr. Walter Martin was no longer around for you to " borrow"
from his writings in your "I'm an expert on cults and the occult"
scam.

Hell, Bob, you didn't even know that Alucard is Dracula spelled
backwards!

The only " authority" you are is on how to manipulate desperate and
hurting people for your on selfish ends.

BTW, didn't you even bother to think how it looks like when a 67 year
old man pretending to be a priest is bringing with him four young
women to sell " his" "reality series" that has more letch in it that
learning? Particularly when one of the original five girls has been
"absent" from the publicity. Gee , wonder why?

>  Why do you think BL
> is still to this day looked to and sought by people all over the globe
> (not just major media!)  as the source, a one-stop for his expertise
> on demons and exorcism from a Christian perspective :)

Self praise noted. Answer: because they fall for your self publicity
and vain eagerness to be in front of the camera and they don't know
how much a liar you are. Or in some cases, they don't care but need to
fill air time and any posturing pissant will do for them.

>
> > I highly doubt you will ever reach your hyped height again.
>
> Then you doubt in vain, toodles.  BL has more widespread media
> exposure today in the secular world than he ever did before.  Are you
> in denial or just plain asleep at the switch?

((Derisive snort)) Back on Bill Maher's show yet Bob? Your self
publicity machine does not equate to credibility, Bob. Like the "
adjustable rate mortages" TV ads some years ago, are what you present
and the reality of what you are two very different things.

OH, I did notice that you emphasized "secular" media. Because
CHRISTIAN radio and TV won't have you on. You know, like when you went
on the 700 Club with your alien mask and MIB black glasses act. Didn't
get invited back, did you Bobbie?

>
> >  As for your "salvation", Bob, does being "saved" give you license to
> > lie, cheat, abuse, exploit, womanize and otherwise use people for your
> > obsessive needs for notoriety and money?
>
> Since BL has never lied, cheated, abused, womanized or use people for
> any such purpose, the question is moot.

Avoidance noted and lies noted. Oh, I should add one more think KSIC.
How would YOU know Bob Larson never did such things, since you claimed
that you were just a listener?

You can claim sainthood, Bobbie, but the facts indicate that you have
a number of things to hide.

Why seal your DIVORCE court record where you divorced your first,
faithful wife?

Why did you act in almost "demonic" anger on Anderson Cooper when
faced with certain allegations of your less than noble reality?

Why require all your BLM staff to sign a multi-page " confidentiality
agreement", including the husband of Margo, who never worked for you?

Why are you refusing to allow said former employees after all these
years since BLM folded the freedom to talk about what went on inside
BLM?

Oh, and lest I forget, you seem to have forgotten the PUBLISHED
incident of your melodramatic shutting off the mic on your radio show
when Christianity Today reported that in fact you PLANNED the event.

> Remember, those accusations
> have ruined certain person's personal lives over the course of their
> out-of-control vendetta, as there has never been any credible evidence
> to prove those bogus claims when it came time to pay the piper :)

Who are you referring to, Bob? If you mean Ken Smith, you sued him,
and lost Bobbie. You made yourself a public figure, and the the rules
of law for that differ than for a private citizen Bob.

You might want to be concerned regarding " paying the piper" yourself
Bob, both in the carnal world and on your Judgment.

As for your veiled threat,since you claim you are not Bob Larson,
your threat has no merit. But you should know this: There are more
members of the Team than Motal, Ashcraft and myself. And Motal WANTS
you to sue him, old man.

Think about that.

>
> > > Your biblical ignorance is profound.
>
> >  Actually you rely upon the ignorance and gullibility of people who
> > don't know the Bible and how you are a false teacher misleading them
> > for your on greed.
>
> That's news to me!

Don't be silly, Bob. You know that to be true.

>
> > I know enough to know what you are and are not Bob.
>
> Spoken like a true stalker.

More like someone who has observed Bob Larson for years. You might
want to actually know what a stalker is and the signs of a stalker
before trying to claim I am one, Bob. You can try to discredit me with
that lie all you wish. The FBI profile of what a stalker is and what I
have done indicate quite clearly I am no stalker.

You made yourself a public figure, Bob. I observe and comment on your
exploitations and lies. If that means "stalker" then Limbaugh, etc,
who comment about President Obama are stalkers by your erroneous
definition.

> You're too much of a coward to even show
> up in person to a seminar or a rally or any public appearance of BL's
> to tell him what you think of him.  That is a cold hard fact,
> toodles. . .

Projection noted. Bob. Say again how you refuse to email me for a
Skype meeting...? :-)

BTW Bobbie, What makes you so sure I have never showed up at any of
your public or quasi-public venues?

As for your claims, both your "rallies" and "seminars" are not truly
open to the public, are they Bob? When Motal confronted you after your
conference scam in Austin Texas, you asked for security to escort him
out. Looks like cowardice to me. And since you are running a cult
operation and there was this rather glaring eyewitness report of how
one or more of your thugs assaulted a protester at one of your
appearances before you decided to hide behind a motel chain run by one
of the cults you used to condemn, I am no fool Bob. I know what you
would try if I showed up and you realized it was me.

I did not show up at AC because of pressing prior matters.

But hey, if you are so eager to see me personally, email me and you
can come to visit me in person in a public place. You being out in the
open in a venue you can't hide behind should be interesting.

>
> > > You have now wasted 27 years of your life that you will never get back
> > > stalking Bob Larson,
>
> >  the amount of time I spent over the years observing your
> > self-publicity, grandiosity and outrageous behavior is far less than
> > what you assume.  :-)
>
> 27 years is a very, very long time Maureen.

Like your marriage to your first wife, Bob? The one you betrayed?

>
> >  I started my log books because
>
> You're crazy...

Ad hom noted.

>
> > it was a personal study of an aberrant
> > personality
>
> It's a tangible, glaring piece of evidence illustrating your
> sickness.

The log books of which you tried to con out of me one time in the "
rush, don't stop, do it now" act you pulled a few years ago.

Bob, it is clear that you are trying desperately to discredit me, to
make claims about me in the event that I will face you in one of your
" major media" appearances.

Because what happened at Anderson Cooper did some damage to your
credibility, right Bobbie? And the ironic thing about that is that
what went on the air isn't the more-- interesting-- things about the
real you Bobbie.

People can think of me what they will. You can call me all sorts of
names as you wish while your ironically hide pretending not to be Bob
Larson.

>
> > Thank you for admitting you saw a counselor Bob. Now then, which
> > mental or personality problems did you seek counseling for? Your
> > biploar, your addiction to porn of a certain degenerate type,  or
> > something else you have done?
>
> BL is bipolar and has an addiction to porn??  That's news to me.  Only
> a cracked-out mind could conjure up one of those zingers?

Certain accounts indicate manic episodes, Bob. The accounts of Laura
with porn in your office at BLM by eyewitnesses and one highly
credible hearsay account indicate that Bob Larson has some serious
porn issues. Not to mention the only stuff you actually DID write in
"Dead Air" were quite pornographic, right Bobbie?


As I said, I am not qualified to make such clinical diagnoses ( as
you are not qualified, I should add) but i can make some educated
guesses.

BTW Bob, I LOVE your "Bob Larson Speaks Out" tape on Elvis Presley
where you begin by describing your, ahem, " intense" fascination with
Elvis' crotch on his first TV appearance. But then, you have been so
interested regarding penises-- penises on "demons", the transexual's "
missing" penis, etc...

>
> > > Your father Frank has urged you to seek professional help and
> > > stick to it.
>
> > Since when?
>
> Since when?!  Interesting choice of words. . .

Actually no. You infer that you spoke to my father, claiming his
name is Frank. How? By a ouija board?

I doubt your claim, Bob.
Feel free to prove me wrong.

>
> > > Sounds awfully personal there, toodles.
>
> >  Not really. For too long I've been just gathering info and making
> > comments online. I really haven't done much more than that, but my
> > Anderson Cooper experience has convinced me that what I have been
> > doing is rather weak, that there needs to be a central location for
> > all things McExorcist. Press kits, that sort of thing.
>
> O Please.  Are you saying that you can outdo KS?

Thanks for admitting in your usual cowardly way that "KS" did a fine
job in his time exposing you for the liar and fraud you are. He used
facts and evidence, including your own diary in your own handwriting,
to back up his claims. But as you know he was only one of a handful of
people then that got together, pooled their resources, and managed to
expose the real you.

If you are looking for an "outdo" in this current Team, Bob, you're
looking at the wrong person. I'm the least of your concerns.

But hey, keep being distracted by focusing your mockery on me, old
man. It blinds you to what is really going on.

>  Ha!  As you know,
> that crashed and burned and then some. :D

Like you did on Anderson Cooper, Bob?

BTW< how many media venues did you have planned that suddenly said "
no thank you"?

>
> Sounds to me as if the crack has gotten the best of you. :(

Crack?

If you are implying I used drugs, you are lying yet again.

You might want to talk to your buddy Ted Haggard about cracks of both
the illegal drug and male posterior types. Are you admitting you are
an "ass man", by any chance?

That might explain your " intestinal abscesses".

>
> > > I'm sure if BL ever caught
> > > wind of that one, his legal counsel would have a field day with that
> > > incriminating omen.  So much for your "observer and commentator"
> > > whitewash.  :)
>
> > His "legal counsel" doesn't seem to be too competent.
>
> Well you are either being intentionally obtuse here, or you're far
> more out of the loop than you'd care to admit.  After that comment, I
> now tend to believe it's the latter. . . :)

Your veiled threats don't match up to reality Bob. And its not a one
way street. Michael Savage sued CAIR and lost big time over their use
of an audio statement he made.

Where is the fifth " teen exorcist" Bob? :-D

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 11, 1:55 am, Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:17:54 -0800 (PST), kensmithiscool

> <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <f3e341e2-0e76-4cca-b5dc-233795724...@gw9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>:

Nah, he's a lotta hot air and posturing. He can focus on me all he
wants. It just makes it all that much better that he's distracted and
doesn't notice other directions, so to speak.

Moe

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 12, 3:16 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:41:33 -0700 (PDT), KabukiBob
>
> <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> [snip to focus on this point]

>
> >> > Says a human being who has observed you more or less since 1986.
>
> >> Has it now become 1986? Up until now, you've said it was 1985. It's
> >> now 2012, toodles, which means you're nearing 3 decades of obsessing
> >> over BL.
>
> >Not obsession Bob. More like watch the nut job do his various scams
> >and attention seeking crap.
>

> Bob is hoping against hope that you'll get embarrassed into
> ceasing paying any attention to him.


I disagree. Narcissistic psychopaths don't get "embarrassed."
Maureen's been on BL's trail for 27 years. Maureen is driven by the
delusion that she has a right to BL. What's unfortunate here is that
she seems to be oblivious to the legal rights the untold number of
demonic forces have on her soul.


> This would, possibly, allow him
> to con more people, since there would be less for anyone to find about
> him on-line.
> What's almost funny is that he probably thought it would work.


Kent, did you forget that you're supposed to be in Aruba right now?
Oops. :-)

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 11, 4:41 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Has it now become 1986? Up until now, you've said it was 1985. It's
> > now 2012, toodles, which means you're nearing 3 decades of obsessing
> > over BL.
>
> Not obsession Bob. More like watch the nut job do his various scams
> and attention seeking crap.

But is it 1985 or 1986, toodles? You're really starting to show your
age, Maureen. :)

> Your vain, ego-stroking claims otherwise, the simple truth is I spent
> very little time regarding you over the years. But hey, everyone has
> to have a hobby or two. :-)

My goodness, toodles. If BL is your hobby or two, you really need to
get a life in a serious way. Take it from me, there really is a big
world out there. You just need to find the confidence to get out
there and make the most of it. . .

> I consider it much like being an accidental collector. You find
> something of a certain type, bring it home, find another example of
> that type, bring THAT home, and slowly but surely you find that
> instead of an occasional object, you ended up with a collection.

Yes, Ebay has been good to you over the years in feeding that BL
obsession. With that BL shrine of yours, don't you realize that
you're turning your dad's house into a potential, future Horders
episode? I don't think Frank would be too thrilled about that.

> You're still upset that the Anderson Cooper appearance brought out one
> of your demons, the " demon of anger", right Gollum?

First you call me Bob, and now Gollum? Who are you? Which alter am I
speaking to?

>And here I am
> revealing that one of those that showed up, good ol Rev. Motal ( wink,
> wink) was because of my recommendation.

I never heard of Rev. Motal until you came here pimping his aspiration
to be a media minister. BL has over the years had many posers come
out of the wood pile and try to capitalize on his success. Often, the
enemy often worms itself within the Christian community. This is
satanism.

> I find it heartening that some of your victims are having the courage
> to speak up

Are they finally going to identify themselves for once? :)

>about how you deceived them, ripped them off and cast them
> aside.

Unfortunately for you, people who matter are wise now to the anti-BL
shenanigans, as they are armed with knowledge to consider the source.
And the anti-BL folks (the both of them) has *never* been a credible
one. Woot! :)

> I know the truth about some of the behind the scenes stuff at BLM,
> Bob. I know who really took the risks, went the extra mile at the "
> compassion connection" scam of yours and it wasn't you.

It wasn't me. It was BL. And when you are a large as BLM, it doesn't
take a genius to figure out that BL employed a staff. No news there,
poopsie pie. . .

> > BL is leading in the fight
>
> More like run away when confronted, you coward. And lying about
> knowing of a person you and I BOTH know you knew from sight.

When has BL ever hid from anyone?

> More like preying UPON the hurting,the vunerable. Dashing their hopes
> after you get what you want from them and leave them stranded.

For instance?

> C'mon Bob, your old lies don't work anymore. I know too much about
> the real you and have seen your various scripted spewage for far too

You know nothing about BL, crazy woman -- other than what you heard on
Talk Back, and by reading his books and videos that you've collected
from Ebay.

> You don't' "minister". You exploit and abuse. And praise yourself in
> the process.

How would you know? You haven't even the courage to show up to a
conference and put your ill-founded criticisms of BL to the test. Why
are you a chicken?

>Your
> claims as KSIC that I have demons and my challenge to you to meet in
> Yahoo Chat,

Do I really need to post the source links again to your volley of
hacker threats of the past?

>then on your challenge on Skype to prove I have "demons"
> has resulted in you returning to your hiding mode, like the coward you
> really are.

Once again slowpoke, you need to send me your contact to proceed with
a Skype session. What's holding you back?

>Your responses to me on usenet as KSIC ( under your
> various email addies and even some socks you used) were far from "
> ministering".

Speaking words of deliverance to the captive is becoming the hands and
feet of Jesus, toodles -- delivering those whom He would set free. (2
Cor. 5:20)

> Think about this Bob.if you actually believed your sell job about
> yourself, then "bringing me to the lord" as Christians call it, would
> be a triumph for you.

Which is why anyone following this would have to wonder why you don't
get a spine for once, come out of the shadows and face BL once and for
all. He's not hard to find, toodles.

> You DON'T do it because you know as well as I do you are a phony, a
> vain, greedy egocentric grifter pretending to be Christian.

Unless and until you come forward and confront BL on the Lord's turf,
you're criticisms will remain insincere, and you will never, ever be
taken seriously.

> > BL is leading the way as
> > an ambassador for Christ (2 Cor. 5:20).
>
> Actually no. You have your own cult you made around yourself ( the
> oxomoronicly named "Spiritual Freedom Church", which is in fact none
> of the trio) and you actually DO nothing more than feed your ego and
> run off with people's money after you scam them and use them for your
> selfish purposes. There is not one unselfish, caring cell in your
> body, Bob.

If that was the case, toodles, it wouldn't have ever been the success
it was and continues to be. You just can't fool people of that
magnitude unscathed for more than 4 decades, toodles. In the immortal
words of Abraham Lincoln:

"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the
people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of
the time."

>What other titles are you bestowing upon
> yourself, you old college drop out, ministerial degree by Xian cracker
> jack box, posturing little man?

BL's ministerial credentials are legit toodles. And where did your
clerical collar friends get their ministerial credentials? hmmm????

>
> Pardon me for a minute.....
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

Yep, that is the laughter of Baphomet. . .

> Why would I want such things from a "man" I find repulsive? Do you
> actually think that you are some sort of babe magnet, old man?

Do I think you have masturbated to the thought of BL? I wouldn't rule
that out. It would seem to follow your BL fetish. I tend to believe
that you have an affinity for father figure sugar daddies.

> Also, how can you show " love" when you don't have the capacity to
> actually feel it yourself, Bob? The accounts of your so-called love
> interest with certain BLM staff members was, gee, how shall I put it,
> "obsessive" like a stalker and very much one-sided.

There is no doubt that your twisted imagination could come up with
such a fantasy. I think that your hot and bothered fantasies
predicated upon your desire for BL and his wolverine-like body had
somewhere along the way put you directly in this fantasy role of
phantom (always unnamed!) BLM staff members and BL -- this is your way
to overcompensate your unusual desire to have BL all to yourself.
You've got quite the wild imagination, toodles!

> The only "love" you show is for riches and for attention.

And there explains your envy. . .

> >You're a very twisted individual Maureen.
>
> I'm not victimizing people, using them, mindfucking them, like you are

Neither am I. And I would even go to bat for BL and say ditto for him
too. The real victim here is you toodles . You are a captive to the
forces of darkness -- they have you right where they want you.

> Oh I see. You are trying the crappy father projection dime store
> psychology claim on me. Do you really think I see you as a projection
> of my father?

Me? No. You do have me convinced that you see BL as that missing
piece in your life -- not so much as a spiritual adviser but rather,
as that missing piece in your life to fulfill that fatherly figure
role with a sexual stipulation. You can't honestly believe BL would
have ever been interested in you in that way... right?

> Dude, you are nowhere NEAR what my father was. I am proud of my
> father and what he accomplished in his life, against odds that would
> have made coward YOU crap in your pants.

In my heart of hearts, I just don't believe Frank is proud of his
little girl. How could he honestly look at your situation and say, "I
did good."?

> BTW, didn't you even bother to think how it looks like when a 67 year
> old man pretending to be a priest is bringing with him four young
> women to sell " his" "reality series" that has more letch in it that
> learning? Particularly when one of the original five girls has been
> "absent" from the publicity. Gee , wonder why?

Not that you would have any knowledge. Heck, you don't even realize
that 2 of the 5 have been absent :)

>You know, like when you went
> on the 700 Club with your alien mask and MIB black glasses act. Didn't
> get invited back, did you Bobbie?

In case you haven't noticed, BL's been quite occupied with other
appearances :)

> When Motal confronted you after your
> conference scam in Austin Texas, you asked for security to escort him
> out. Looks like cowardice to me.

That's funny. When good ole' buddy John Hattan was shown the way out
and did a face plant, I didn't hear you claim cowardice. As for
"rev." Moetal, I think the confusion came about when people thought he
was there looking for the Dan Quayle Look-a-Like Contest :D

> I did not show up at AC because of pressing prior matters.

Did Frank require the regular hand job?

> But hey, if you are so eager to see me personally, email me and you
> can come to visit me in person in a public place. You being out in the
> open in a venue you can't hide behind should be interesting.

You're the one fixated on a conversation get-together with me. And
you know what you need to do.

> > > > You have now wasted 27 years of your life that you will never get back
> > > > stalking Bob Larson,
>
> > > the amount of time I spent over the years observing your
> > > self-publicity, grandiosity and outrageous behavior is far less than
> > > what you assume. :-)

It's 27 years. That's no assumption.

> Because what happened at Anderson Cooper did some damage to your
> credibility, right Bobbie?

I can't speak for Bob, but I can say that if you think the AC
appearance somehow damaged BL, I'd imagine you're in for another
serious letdown :)

> Thanks for admitting in your usual cowardly way that "KS" did a fine
> job in his time exposing you for the liar and fraud you are. He used
> facts and evidence, including your own diary in your own handwriting,
> to back up his claims. But as you know he was only one of a handful of
> people then that got together, pooled their resources, and managed to
> expose the real you.

Misinformation, disinformation and outright lies designed to look
truthful. I'm just saying that there isn't anything you of all people
could do to enhance that train wreck. And where did all of this get
KS? It's unfortunate that all of that nonsensical riff-raff
ultimately ended with the Examiners' Board of the Colorado Bar
Association requiring chicKen to submit to a psychological
examination. :(

> Where is the fifth " teen exorcist" Bob? :-D

Well I can't answer for Bob, but shouldn't the question be: "What
happened to the 4th and 5th teen exorcists? :) Sorry to take the wind
out of your question's false insider inference :D
I suppose it's safe to assume that your "source" failed to tell you
they're sisters ;) I just love how your false sense of insider
knowledge falls apart for all to see :-)

[Greegor]

> My goodness, toodles.  If BL is your hobby or two, you really need to
> get a life in a serious way.  Take it from me, there really is a big
> world out there.  You just need to find the confidence to get out
> there and make the most of it. . .

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg

> >  I consider it much like being an accidental collector. You find
> > something of a certain type, bring it home, find another example of
> > that type, bring THAT home, and slowly but surely you find that
> > instead of an occasional object, you ended up with a collection.

> Yes,  Ebay has been good to you over the years in feeding that BL
> obsession.  With that BL shrine of yours, don't you realize that
> you're turning your dad's house into a potential, future Horders
> episode?   I don't think Frank would be too thrilled about that.

http://secure.public-records-now.com/summary.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=maureen&ln=mcallister&city=dardanelle&state=AR

MCALLISTER, MAUREEN, 52

Dardanelle, AR
Russellville, AR

AKA MCALLISTER, MICHAEL

Associated with:
MCALLISTER, SUZANNE
MCALLISTER, FRANK A
PATEL, DHARMAKUMA

> > You're still upset that the Anderson Cooper appearance brought out one
> > of your demons, the " demon of anger", right Gollum?
>
> First you call me Bob, and now Gollum?  Who are you? Which alter am I
> speaking to?
>
> >And here I am
> > revealing that one of those that showed up, good ol Rev. Motal ( wink,
> > wink) was because of my recommendation.

> I never heard of Rev. Motal until you came here pimping his aspiration
> to be a media minister.  BL has over the years had many posers come
> out of the wood pile and try to capitalize on his success.  Often, the
> enemy often worms itself within the Christian community.   This is
> satanism.
>
> > I find it heartening that some of your victims are having the courage
> > to speak up
>
> Are they finally going to identify themselves for once? :)
>
> >about how you deceived them, ripped them off and cast them
> > aside.

Maureen posts about theoretical disgruntled former BL followers?
I'm sure she figures they would carry more weight than she would
with her 27 years of impotent OBSESSION and harassment of BL.

Do you suppose that's why Kent tried posing as a disgruntled
former follower of BL?

Kent was actually DEFENDING BL on usenet (poorly) but
after Kent's extended jail and court hiatus ended Kent had
flipped against BL without any explanation of the reversal.

> Unfortunately for you, people who matter are wise now to the anti-BL
> shenanigans, as they are armed with knowledge to consider the source.
> And the anti-BL folks (the both of them) has *never* been a credible
> one.  Woot! :)

Isn't it gratifying to have such enemies as
Maureen McAllister and Kent Bradley Wills?

Maureen loves to do that.

> > Actually no. You have your own cult you made around yourself ( the
> > oxomoronicly named "Spiritual Freedom Church", which is in fact none
> > of the trio) and you actually DO nothing more than feed your ego and
> > run off with people's money after you scam them and use them for your
> > selfish purposes. There is not one unselfish, caring cell in your
> > body, Bob.

Maureen the pagan argues between different Christian denominations?
Why would you care which denomination, Maureen?
You're a self styled pagan regardless.

> > What other titles are you bestowing upon
> > yourself, you old college drop out, ministerial degree by Xian cracker
> > jack box, posturing little man?

Where did you get your degree from, Maureen?
Do the people of Dardanelle know where their community brain surgeon
was educated?

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg

> > Why would I want such things from a "man" I find repulsive? Do you
> > actually think that you are some sort of babe magnet, old man?

Maureen thinks she's a babe? ROFL

Out of date photo of course. Love the sunglasses, babe.

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg

> Do I think you have masturbated to the thought of BL?  I wouldn't rule
> that out. It would seem to follow your BL fetish.  I tend to believe
> that you have an affinity for father figure sugar daddies.

Maureen, Frank needs your assistance in the bathroom.
Bring another roll.

> > Also, how can you show " love" when you don't have the capacity to
> > actually feel it yourself, Bob? The accounts of your so-called love
> > interest with certain BLM staff members was, gee, how shall I put it,
> > "obsessive" like a stalker and very much one-sided.

Let the record show that Moe posted unsupported hearsay
(gossip) probably fabricated by BL harassers and used
that as a basis to criticize someone else's love life.

[...]

> >  The only "love" you show is for riches and for attention.
>
> And there explains your envy. . .

Perhaps it explains it partly, but mostly it REVEALS Moe's envy.

> > >You're a very twisted individual Maureen.
>
> > I'm not victimizing people, using them, mindfucking them, like you are

Maureen LOVES deception. Like Kent, her real life is miserable.

[...]

> >  Dude, you are nowhere NEAR what my father was. I am proud of my
> > father and what he accomplished in his life, against odds that would
> > have made coward YOU crap in your pants.

Maureen hopes that some of her father's nobility
rubbed off on her, yet she's a pagan.

> In my heart of hearts, I just don't believe Frank is proud of his
> little girl.  How could he honestly look at your situation and say, "I
> did good."?

You KNOW that Frank was not a pagan.

> >  BTW, didn't you even bother to think how it looks like when a 67 year
> > old man pretending to be a priest is bringing with him four young
> > women to sell " his" "reality series" that has more letch in it that
> > learning? Particularly when one of the original five girls has been
> > "absent" from the publicity. Gee , wonder why?

> Not that you would have any knowledge.  Heck, you don't even realize
> that 2 of the 5 have been absent :)

Maureen's pretense of SUPERIORITY must be offended by that mistake.

> >You know, like when you went
> > on the 700 Club with your alien mask and MIB black glasses act. Didn't
> > get invited back, did you Bobbie?

Hey KSIC, Can you send me a photo of that? Sounds fun.

> In case you haven't noticed, BL's been quite occupied with other
> appearances :)

> > When Motal confronted you after your
> > conference scam in Austin Texas, you asked for security to escort him
> > out.  Looks like cowardice to me.

Most would consider that to be harassment.

> That's funny.  When good ole' buddy John Hattan was shown the way out
> and did a face plant, I didn't hear you claim cowardice.  As for
> "rev." Moetal, I think the confusion came about when people thought he
> was there looking for the Dan Quayle Look-a-Like Contest :D

> > I did not show up at AC because of pressing prior matters.
>
> Did Frank require the regular hand job?

I knew she was his bathroom attendant, but that's different.

> > But hey, if you are so eager to see me personally, email me and you
> > can come to visit me in person in a public place. You being out in the
> > open in a venue you can't hide behind should be interesting.

Sure Moe, all your opponents have to do is make
a move that makes THEM look like the obsessed
harasser to take the heat off you, right?

> You're the one fixated on a conversation get-together with me.  And
> you know what you need to do.

Moe likes to challenge opponents to confrontation
and then pretend that THEY challenged her.

[...]

> Misinformation, disinformation and outright lies designed to look
> truthful.  I'm just saying that there isn't anything you of all people
> could do to enhance that train wreck.  And where did all of this get
> KS?  It's unfortunate that all of that nonsensical riff-raff
> ultimately ended with the Examiners' Board of the Colorado Bar
> Association requiring chicKen to submit to a psychological
> examination.  :(

He was almost licensed to practice law but threw
it away to misuse the court process to try to collect
fodder for more stalking and harassment.

Pretty sad really.

> >  Where is the fifth " teen exorcist" Bob? :-D
>
> Well I can't answer for Bob, but shouldn't the question be: "What
> happened to the 4th and 5th teen exorcists? :)  Sorry to take the wind
> out of your question's false insider inference :D
> I suppose it's safe to assume that your "source" failed to tell you
> they're sisters ;)  I just love how your false sense of insider
> knowledge falls apart for all to see :-)

Moe's pretense of SUPERIORITY must be offended by this.

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 12, 1:45 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_258656...


Well, now my screen just cracked. Thanks-a-lot! :)

> Maureen posts about theoretical disgruntled former BL followers?

In a nutshell, yes. And she makes a full time job out of it.
Toodles has no names or identities to go with the theoretical and
never did. Why? Because her source KS curiously never provided names
or identities. Wouldn't names and identities to go with the story be
fabulous? Smoke and mirrors.

> Kent was actually DEFENDING BL on usenet (poorly) but
> after Kent's extended jail and court hiatus ended Kent had
> flipped against BL without any explanation of the reversal.

Apparently, Kent was desperately looking for acceptance, and the Bob
Larson Fan Cult was all too eager to fill that void. :)

> Where did you get your degree from, Maureen?

What degree? :)

> > >You know, like when you went
> > > on the 700 Club with your alien mask and MIB black glasses act. Didn't
> > > get invited back, did you Bobbie?
>
> Hey KSIC, Can you send me a photo of that?   Sounds fun.

Ahh...you know Toodles has it in her BL collection! :) Her collection
probably puts BL's collection to shame!

> He was almost licensed to practice law but threw
> it away to misuse the court process to try to collect
> fodder for more stalking and harassment.
>
> Pretty sad really.

He was ruined by his own vendetta. Tragic. That whole saga would
make for a great book, eh? :)

> Moe's pretense of SUPERIORITY must be offended by this.

All light and no heat. . .

[Greegor]

On Mar 12, 3:16 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

KBW > Bob is hoping against hope that you'll get embarrassed into
KBW > ceasing paying any attention to him.

KSIC > I disagree.  Narcissistic psychopaths don't get
KSIC > "embarrassed." Maureen's been on BL's trail
KSIC > for 27 years.  Maureen is driven by the delusion
KSIC > that she has a right to BL.  What's unfortunate
KSIC > here is that she seems to be oblivious to the
KSIC > legal rights the untold number of demonic
KSIC > forces have on her soul.

KBW > This would, possibly, allow him to con more
KBW > people, since there would be less for anyone
KBW > to find about him on-line. What's almost
KBW > funny is that he probably thought it would work.

KSIC > Kent, did you forget that you're supposed
KSIC > to be in Aruba right now? Oops.  :-)

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 13, 3:25 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >I disagree.  Narcissistic psychopaths don't get "embarrassed."
>

>      So that's why you keep doing what you're doing.  I had wondered.
>      Well, that's one mystery solved.



Well, unlike you and Maureen, I'm not the one putting my actual name
out there. That's what narcissistic psychopaths do. Thank you for
augmenting the crux of my two cents' worth.

> >Maureen's been on BL's trail for 27 years.
>

>      Keeping him from getting the massive attention you, er, he wants.



When has that ever happened? :)

> >Maureen is driven by the
> >delusion that she has a right to BL.
>

>      She's made no such expression.



Her delusional, vile nature colors everything she says and does. . .

> >Kent, did you forget that you're supposed to be in Aruba right now?
>

>      We were gone for a week, simpleton.  Unless you're using Greg
> Hanson math, seven days equals one week.



Well, you last posted here on March 3rd and resumed posting here as
Kent Wills March 10th. That just strikes me a bit odd. In fact, it
would strike any experienced traveler as odd considering all the time
and energy that goes into it. You didn't waste any time getting back
here posting, because 7 days is exactly the amount of time between
your pre-trip post and your post-trip post. But then again, you have
been proven over and over to be a pathological internet liar. You
overplayed your hand on this one, Kent. :)





> >Oops.  :-)
>
>      You can't count to seven.
>      It appears your demon of lying, the one you FEAR being without,
> is really putting in the over time.


Well you sure get awfully testy over an innocent little "Oops,"
Kent! :D

[KabukiBob]

(( rolls eyes)) More lies from KSIC/Bob Larson.

Seriously Bob, do you really think I'm 'scared" of you? Your little
tactics recently don't impress me one bit, old man.

You don't realize what you are doing, do you McExorcist?

My goodness, Bobbie, it's not like I was born yesterday or am as naive
as your eldest daughter.

But do keep on posting KSIC. I still find you amusing, though dull
most of the time.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 12, 11:33 am, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 4:41 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

(( long snippage))

(( rolls eyes)) Speaking of obsessions, Bob.....

Tell ya what,KSIC, why don't you email me for the details of th Skype
meeting you say you want to have with me-- but are too cowardly to
actually follow through.

Such energy focused on little ol' me. I should be flattered, I guess,
but golly, I can almost see the panic behind your attacks KSIC.

BTW Bob, the " Team" is considerably more than three people, old man.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 13, 9:54 am, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 13, 3:25 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >I disagree.  Narcissistic psychopaths don't get "embarrassed."
>
> >      So that's why you keep doing what you're doing.  I had wondered.
> >      Well, that's one mystery solved.
>
> Well, unlike you and Maureen, I'm not the one putting my actual name
> out there.

Translation: We are open and stand for the truth about Bob Larson,
fraud. You OTOH are a coward and lie.

(( SIGHS)) KSIC, you've been doing this for quite some time, hiding
behind a name that ironically includes the name of a man that was
among a few men that exposed you as the lying, greedy, vain "man" you
are way back in the early 90's.

All your bluster and BS to the contrary won't change the fact. Nor
will the fact that Bob Larson will never, ever, be "noted in history"
as you wish you will be.

> That's what narcissistic psychopaths do.  Thank you for
> augmenting the crux of my two cents' worth.
>
> > >Maureen's been on BL's trail for 27 years.
>
> >      Keeping him from getting the massive attention you, er, he wants.
>
> When has that ever happened?  :)
>
> > >Maureen is driven by the
> > >delusion that she has a right to BL.
>
> >      She's made no such expression.
>
> Her delusional, vile nature colors everything she says and does. . .

Vile? (( smirks)) like the vile scenes you wrote in "Dead Air" the
same scenes that made the REAL author of the novel concerned for the
welfare of her teenage daughters? Oh and how COINCIDENTAL that her
daughter's names were Brynne and Ann.

BTW if you want to be viewed as this good guy, Bob, your really should
rescind the "gag orders" that you imposed on your former BLM
employees, including poor, dear Margo. But then you need to keep them
quiet, don't you, because of what you did that you don't want your
current crop of suckers and cult followers knowing about.

>
> > >Kent, did you forget that you're supposed to be in Aruba right now?
>
> >      We were gone for a week, simpleton.  Unless you're using Greg
> > Hanson math, seven days equals one week.
>
> Well, you last posted here on March 3rd and resumed posting here as
> Kent Wills March 10th.  That just strikes me a bit odd.  In fact, it
> would strike any experienced traveler as odd considering all the time
> and energy that goes into it.

I frequently do not post for days at a time, Bob.

News flash for ya, old man. Not everyone needs to be online every
day. Gaggie, OC is an exception.

> You didn't waste any time getting back
> here posting, because 7 days is exactly the amount of time between
> your pre-trip post and your post-trip post.  But then again, you have
> been proven over and over to be a pathological internet liar.  You
> overplayed your hand on this one, Kent. :)

(( rolls eyes)) More red herrings. Actually, ironically enough
considering an earlier post you made directed at me, most people have
a life outside of the online world. And we live in this sometimes
fascinating world call the real world.

You aren't that important, old fart. :-D

>
> > >Oops.  :-)
>
> >      You can't count to seven.
> >      It appears your demon of lying, the one you FEAR being without,
> > is really putting in the over time.
>
> Well you sure get awfully testy over an innocent little "Oops,"
> Kent! :D

More like he's pointing out one of your demons, Bob.

You know, like that "demon of anger" you showed on the Anderson
Cooper talk show.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 12, 11:33 am, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:

> was there...
>
> read more »

To borrow gaggie's recent word obsession....

How FROTHY of you KSIC!

(( chuckles))

((Shakes head)) Talk about ironies....

Moe

[kensmithiscool]

No, I don't think you're scared of BL. But I do know that your
demons are terrified of him as they are fully aware of what will
happen to them. But that is dependent upon whether you ever get the
courage to get yourself to an exorcism and surrender yourself to
Christ.

> My goodness, Bobbie, it's not like I was born yesterday or am as naive
> as your eldest daughter.

You may not have been born yesterday, but people do wonder if you were
just dropped on this planet.

> But do keep on posting KSIC. I still find you amusing, though dull
> most of the time.

Maureen, you really do need to get yourself a life. Rent one if you
have to.

[Checkmate]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

Didn't he die a while back?

> > My goodness, Bobbie, it's not like I was born yesterday or am as naive
> > as your eldest daughter.
>
>
> You may not have been born yesterday, but people do wonder if you were
> just dropped on this planet.
>
>
>
> > But do keep on posting KSIC. I still find you amusing, though dull
> > most of the time.
>
>
> Maureen, you really do need to get yourself a life. Rent one if you
> have to.

--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
Hammer of Thor, Feb. 2012
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved

"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"

-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 15, 1:17 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>  He clearly doesn't know me. I think the recent, ahem, downturn in the
> Bob Larson look-at-me media circuit has poor widdle KSICie's panties

[?!]

What downturn? BL knew exactly he was walking into a lion's den.
Anyone who purchases a firehouse as an abode and throws homosexual
parties clearly isn't going to be nice to evangelists. It did though
introduce a few hundred thousand people to BL and the teen exorcists.
Did you really think that appearance wasn't going to lead to other
things, poopsie? :D



>  Yeah, he does wish I would stop keeping tabs on McExorcist.  A few of
> the push-her-button tactics show that.


Outside of this -- http://youtu.be/Wr1ku07Eybo -- I would be shocked
if BL even remembers you -- Born Again Pagan, of course.



>  Almost makes ya wonder if he's hiding a more recent screw up he
> doesn't want getting out  to the public. :-)
>
> Moe


Yeah... you might be on to something! You know, I bet BL didn't pick
up that dry cleaning today for Chicago this weekend and didn't inform
L. Horrors! :D

[linuxgal]

kensmithiscool wrote:
> On Mar 15, 1:17 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> He clearly doesn't know me. I think the recent, ahem, downturn in the
>> Bob Larson look-at-me media circuit has poor widdle KSICie's panties
>
> [?!]
>
> What downturn? BL knew exactly he was walking into a lion's den.
> Anyone who purchases a firehouse as an abode and throws homosexual
> parties clearly isn't going to be nice to evangelists.

Wow, this group is still going on? Hasn't been the same glory days
since John Hattan left.

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 15, 1:45 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Translation: We are open and stand for the truth about Bob Larson,
> fraud. You OTOH are a coward and lie.

I'd love to hear that one under deposition...

> (( SIGHS)) KSIC, you've been doing this for quite some time, hiding
> behind a name that ironically includes the name of a man that was
> among a few men that exposed you as the lying, greedy, vain "man" you
> are way back in the early 90's.

Say, what did that "expose" end up costing him anyway? Poor guy :D

> All your bluster and BS to the contrary won't change the fact. Nor
> will the fact that Bob Larson will never, ever, be "noted in history"
> as you wish you will be.

I'm afraid you're too late. BL is the foremost authority on cults,
the occult and supernatural phenomena -- for starters. BL's
popularity and following are growing. Deal, toodles.

> BTW if you want to be viewed as this good guy, Bob, your really should
> rescind the "gag orders" that you imposed on your former BLM
> employees, including poor, dear Margo. But then you need to keep them
> quiet, don't you, because of what you did that you don't want your
> current crop of suckers and cult followers knowing about.

You make non-disclosure agreements sound sooo heinous! Fortunately,
most people understand that a NDAs are commonly signed -- especially
in business. Many employment agreements include legalese that
prevents an employee from disseminating Ministry-owned confidential
information. You wouldn't understand this, since you don't have the
education or even a skill set to mention that would ever put you
within reach of one.

> most people have
> a life outside of the online world.

Okay, so you and Kent are a minority of 2. I'll accept that...

> And we live in this sometimes
> fascinating world call the real world.

If and when that ever happens, be sure to let the online world know.

> You aren't that important, old fart. :-D

If you're talking about BL, then why do you hit boblarson.org on a
daily basis, toodles?

> > Well you sure get awfully testy over an innocent little "Oops,"
> > Kent! :D
>
> More like he's pointing out one of your demons, Bob.
>
> You know, like that "demon of anger" you showed on the Anderson
> Cooper talk show.
>
> Moe

I thought BL came off with a whole lot of class. I didn't sense any
anger out of BL. If you did, it was because you were looking for it,
toodles. Although if someone had viciously attacked my little girl on
or off camera, I imagine my proficiency in Jiu-Jitsu would have
rendered that person unconscious immediately. For BL to have kept
his composure on that one alone is admirable.

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 15, 3:16 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>  Or the vile post you made claiming my father gets " hand jobs" from
> me.


Well, you are from the South....


>  I understand that Laura did have a father fixation regarding you,
> seeing as you are 18 years older than she, so when the reports from
> BLM staff


Did you ever come up with an actual name to go with that?


> about her going into your office at BLM with porno and
> closing the door, well such " private" meetings what was her "job"?


Could it be that your problem with L is that she ended up with BL?
Since you don't know personally her, it stands to reason that you hate
her for taking the place of which you see as yours. You can't
honestly believe for a New York minute that you ever had a chance to
become Mrs. BL.... right? Be honest with yourself, toodles. Your
sole purpose in life is as provider of southern hand jobs on a
disabled, elderly man.




> Your little song and dance about how I am a chicken for not
> emailing you and the rest of your claims about me really is nothing
> more than your posturing online farts when you show yourself,
> ironically, to be a coward.


You are to send your Skype contact. Bawk, Bawk!



>  As for ministerial credentials, Bob, a mail order diploma mill degree
> does not make you on the same level as a person who went to seminary,


What's beautiful is, BL has surpassed many who went to seminary. God
chose BL! So find me someone from a seminary who has a career that
has spanned over 4 decades, lectured in more than 80 countries, had
books translated in numerous languages, has had as many television,
radio and print media appearances and coverage, and worked on a major
motion picture, to name a few.




> Ashcraft has
> told me what his ordination creds are and they are legit.


Because he says so? LOL!

C'mon, toodles... cut the crap :) Why has Jakey kept the alleged
ordination credentials from the public? Who is his Bishop? Is this a
need to know situation? How bizarre...



>Motal,
> unlike you, served his country in the military.


Motal. That's the quack who claims to know the real secrets on Area
51 right? He's not out there tryin' to cash-in is he? Naaaah. Boy,
you really know how to pick 'em, toodles! :)



> As for the amount of "girls" the "source" is your publicity, gollum. I
> never said I had an inside source for that. I was just observing of
> how the " original" group is missing one person, the girl with the
> glasses.



Once again, you not only illustrate how unreliable you are, but you've
unquestionably proven that your fact-checking stinks toodles. If you
had been attentive, you would have known that there were originally 5
teens, not 4. Hard to overlook when the publicity photos are
abound.
Another oops moment for toodles. :D



> To quote Sesame Street : " Which one is not like the others?"


It is obvious that speaking to you like a 4-year-old overestimates
your intellect by several magnitudes, toodles. . .



> But thank you for the correction on the actual kitty count.


And thank you for showing our audience (inadvertently) that you really
haven't a clue as to what you're talking about. Everytime you stray
from the Ken Smith talking points, this inevitably happens. . .

[Fred Hall]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT), kensmithiscool <kensmit...@gmail.com> wrote in
<7459ea3d-0700-4107...@q11g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>:

How much does it cost to attend your International School of Exorcism, Bob?
Can I get a Pell Grant or Student Loan? Payment plan?
What's the job market like for aspiring exorcists?

--

squiggle autoresponses in AUK for March 8 - 15 2012:

1) blank (183 posts)
2) yay (47 posts)
3) hi (28 posts)
4) whatever you say holler back girl (18 posts)
5) get away from me you flaming queen (24 posts)
6) if that's what you want to believe (48 posts)
7) i win (17 posts)
8) LOL (25 posts)
9) let's be buddies (14 posts)
10)your an hour older now (14 posts)
11)boner (14 posts)
12)if only it was me that said those things (16 posts)
13)sure i do (14 posts)
14)yes you are (18 posts)
15)boobs (14 posts)
16)you're over 60 years old (18 posts)
17)fake % (8 posts)
18)no (8 posts)
19)hi how are ya (10 posts)
20)sure i did (8 posts)
21)pee flaps (8 posts)
22)sure i will (7 post)
23)bums (7 posts)
24)hi how's it going now ay (7 posts)
25)sure it is (4 posts)
26)you most certainly are (8 posts)
27)go me go (4 posts)
28)me too (4 posts)
29)that's right (4 posts)
30)i know you are (8 posts)
31)sure you do (4 posts)
32)yes i am (4 posts)
33)sure it did (4 posts)
34)SMACKDOWN (4 posts)
35)boing (4 posts)

[linuxgal]

kensmithiscool wrote:
>
> What downturn? BL knew exactly he was walking into a lion's den.
> Anyone who purchases a firehouse as an abode and throws homosexual
> parties clearly isn't going to be nice to evangelists.

I dunno, Jim Bakker and Ted Haggart and many other thumpers would
probably dig those parties.

[Greegor]

Well, Kent, at least this time you're not trying the
laughable claim that you posted to usenet in the middle
of your Aruba vacation!

You'd have to be REALLY obsessed to actually
post to usened in the middle of an Aruba vacation.

I like the part where you claimed that you cut your
planned one week Aruba vacation short. That was funny too.

You thought that nobody else ever heard of proxies, right Kent?

[Greegor]

Being a short time anony poster, would you want to be
blamed for what posters parallel to you did, ""linuxgal""?

Ironically, considering the history of anonymous posters
that analogy would make far more sense than your lame
innuendo did.

Aspergers?

[linuxgal]

Greegor wrote:
> On Mar 15, 5:33 pm, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>> kensmithiscool wrote:
>>> What downturn? BL knew exactly he was walking into a lion's den.
>>> Anyone who purchases a firehouse as an abode and throws homosexual
>>> parties clearly isn't going to be nice to evangelists.
>
>> I dunno, Jim Bakker and Ted Haggart and many
>> other thumpers would probably dig those parties.
>
> Being a short time anony poster, would you want to be
> blamed for what posters parallel to you did, ""linuxgal""?

If you call 1997 a short time ago maybe you could call me a short
timner. Back when bobbo's fan group was cross-posted to
alt.religion.christian.calvary-chapel and we had to deal with the likes
of Joe Marino and Doug Gilliland.

[Locator]

You're in love with Kent, aren't you?

[pull my finger]

On Mar 16, 11:47 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, Kent, at least this time you're not trying the
> laughable claim that you posted to usenet in the middle
> of your Aruba vacation!
>
> You'd have to be REALLY obsessed to actually
> post to usened in the middle of an Aruba vacation.

KENT DIDN'T GO TO ARUBA. .IT'S ALL BULLSHIT! HIS MOM
IS IN ARUBA NOT KENT!
LQQK HERE---> http://immaculatecongestion.blogspot.com/

[Greegor]

On Mar 16, 11:33 pm, pull my finger <pullmyfinge...@yahoo.com> wrote:
G > Well, Kent, at least this time you're not trying the
G > laughable claim that you posted to usenet in the middle
G > of your Aruba vacation!
G >
G > You'd have to be REALLY obsessed to actually
G > post to usened in the middle of an Aruba vacation.

pmf > KENT   DIDN'T    GO   TO    ARUBA. .IT'S ALL
pmf > BULLSHIT!  HIS   MOM IS  IN ARUBA   NOT KENT!

Of course.

pmf > LQQK HERE--->

http://immaculatecongestion.blogspot.com/

I love how Kent got his Mom to use a fake middle name.
Her name is Janet Rae Wills not Janet Lee Wills.
I'd like to hear how Kent rationalized THAT to her!

[Greegor]

lg > I dunno, Jim Bakker and Ted Haggart and many
lg > other thumpers would probably dig those parties.

G > Being a short time anony poster, would you want to be
G > blamed for what posters parallel to you did, ""linuxgal""?

> If you call 1997 a short time ago maybe you could call me a short
> timner. Back when bobbo's fan group was cross-posted to
> alt.religion.christian.calvary-chapel and we had to deal with the likes
> of Joe Marino and Doug Gilliland.

Ironically, considering the history of anonymous posters
that analogy would make far more sense than your lame
innuendo did.

Aspergers?

Your posting profile shows 288 posts in March 2012 and
zero before that, ever.

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=_6YiShcAAACbqI5QZL4vkVgpV_mKn0-DIHaTvyuZ6VoRYIs0LmmLsg

linuxgal AT cleanposts.com
Name:
Location:
Title:
Industry:
Email address: linu...@cleanposts.com
Website or Blog:
Quote:
About me:

Recent Activity:
Activity in All 52 Groups -- 288 messages alt.atheism (73)
alt.philosophy.taoism (36) alt.religion.christian.biblestudy (13)
soc.culture.jewish (12) alt.talk.creationism (11) alt.abortion (10)
alt.religion.mormon (10) alt.christnet.christianlife (8) alt.fan.rush-
limbaugh (7) alt.christian.bible (7) alt.religion.buddhism.tibetan (7)
alt.christnet (7) alt.zen (6) alt.buddha.short.fat.guy (5)
alt.philosophy (5) talk.politics.misc (5) alt.religion.christian (4)
alt.bible (4) alt.politics.usa (4) alt.pagan (3)
soc.culture.australian (3) alt.religion (3) alt.religion.christi...man-
catholic (3) misc.legal (3) alt.fan.bob-larson (3) alt.astronomy (2)
alt.society.liberalism (2) soc.culture.usa (2) soc.men (2)
alt.agnosticism (2) alt.politics.economics (2) alt.religion.vaisnava
(2) alt.christnet.bible (2) sci.military.naval (2) alt.conspiracy (1)
alt.politics.liberalism (1) sci.physics (1) alt.idiots (1)
alt.bible.prophecy (1) alt.religion.christian.baptist (1)
alt.religion.christian.pentecostal (1) alt.comp.google (1)
alt.religion.christi...ty.hypocrisy (1)
alt.religion.christian.episcopal (1) alt.education (1)
alt.politics.democrats (1) sci.math (1) aus.religion.christian (1)
talk.atheism (1) sci.med (1) alt.religion.jehovahs-witn (1) alt.fan.ed-
conrad (1)
Darwin in Hell Today alt.atheism 42 hours ago
Atheist professor's near-death experience in h ell left him
changed alt.atheism 42 hours ago
Proof is in the pudding alt.religion.vaisnava 42 hours ago
Disproving Creation: Gorilla Genome Mapping Support Theory ...
alt.talk.creationism 43 hours ago
Christian pettiness alt.religion.christian.biblestudy 44 hours
ago
The best religion is Judaism. soc.culture.jewish 2 days ago
The Easter Meditation, Per Courtesy of ~ Budikka
alt.talk.creationism 2 days ago
New York Times ad calls Catholic Church 'autoc ratic, woman ...
alt.religion.christi...man-catholic 2 days ago
If You Are Atheist then You Are Also A Dill alt.agnosticism 2
days ago
3 Common Sense Reasons Why The Trinity Is A False Doctrine
alt.bible 3 days ago
Show all »
Post Activity
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 288

[KabukiBob]

(( rolls eyes)) Your deception and baiting attempt was pretty lame
Bob. You forgot that among my interests is true crime, which includes
criminal investigation and criminal profiling.

The post you made earlier in this thread was the same type of
deception you tried in your pathetic attempt to get " handwritten"
copies of my log books, Bob.

If Ken Smith is right in that you are a psychopath, i wouldn't put it
beneath you to set things up and goad me to come to where you can "
control" things so you can literally get away with murder-- in this
case, your claim of " murdering a stalker in self defense". With a
pasty cop or other law enforcement person either dumb or lazy enough
not to dig beneath the surface of your deceit, you may have actually
thought that your "arranged" "evidence"would justify murdering me or
Motal or Ashcraft.

That is, unless you are unlucky enough to get a cop or other law
enforcement person with the intelligence and the drive to dig below
what appears to be to what actually is.

But for you to succeed, you had to try this manipulation tactic. As if
I haven't seen it before in some true crime cases...

Bob, I may have a number of faults, but naive and gullible are not
among them.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 15, 10:21 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 15, 1:17 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >  He clearly doesn't know me. I think the recent, ahem, downturn in the
> > Bob Larson look-at-me media circuit has poor widdle KSICie's panties
>
> [?!]
>
> What downturn?  BL knew exactly he was walking into a lion's den.
> Anyone who purchases a firehouse as an abode and throws homosexual
> parties clearly isn't going to be nice to evangelists.  It did though
> introduce a few hundred thousand people to BL and the teen exorcists.
> Did you really think that appearance wasn't going to lead to other
> things, poopsie? :D
>
> >  Yeah, he does wish I would stop keeping tabs on McExorcist.  A few of
> > the push-her-button tactics show that.
>

> Outside of this  --http://youtu.be/Wr1ku07Eybo-- I would be shocked

> if BL even remembers you -- Born Again Pagan, of course.
>
> >  Almost makes ya wonder if he's hiding a more recent screw up he
> > doesn't want getting out  to the public. :-)
>
> > Moe
>
> Yeah...  you might be on to something!  You know, I bet BL didn't pick
> up that dry cleaning today for Chicago this weekend and didn't inform
> L.  Horrors!   :D

Nicer posturing Bob, but typical of your ad hominens and your
bullshitting after the fact tactic.

You did the same temper tantrum type response when the university in
Canada where in one of your money grubbing appearances your little
greed feed was interrupted when a group of protesters stopped your
parading around sham show, making you in your usual cowardice retreat,
claim you were physically threatened and on your radio show you
threatened to sue the university for your " lost" income.

And that is one of a number of examples I could mention where things
didn't go your way and you did a little backstabbing soon afterwards.

The things you choose to focus on in your after the event response
shows more of your real nature than anything I could say Bob. Keep it
up.

BTW I love how Jackie Mason made a few quips at your expense on that
one " Politicaly Incorrect" episode, But then you deserved it after
blocking the camera hen you moved your chair closer to the host.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

Not so much, really. Bob Larson is doing yet another scam/con, one of
many he's tried since Talk Back went permanently dead aired. No the
old crook is billing himself as "reverend" Bob Larson, " real
exorcist" and is parading his eldest daughter Brynne with four of her
" friends" to try to get a new reality series geared towards selling
his newest scam " the International School of Exorcism" on national
TV.

He's got his own cult church now, the " Spiritual Freedom Church,"
which you can guess is neither spiritual nor freedom. Kensmithiscool
AKA Bob Larson trying to pretend to not be Bob Larson posts his self-
praise and self-promotions.

But mostly I'm the only one left of the original bunch that keeps an
eye out on the antics of the fraud Bob Larson.

Larson recently had some setbacks in his self-publicity on TV media
route-- his failed "exorcism" of Necrobutcher was a major flop and his
appearance on the Anderson Cooper talk show had some surprises that
Larson became pissed about on camera (( oopsie!)

But mostly the old fraud is touring the freak show circuit.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

Keep on posting KSIC/Bob Larson.

The " foremost authority" claim is a lie and you know it. Bob
Larson's name is not listed in any recent book or reference on cults
or the occult for the past ten years.

However, keep on praising yourself, old man. You make Michael Savage
look modest by comparison. :-D

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 16, 12:07 am, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 15, 3:16 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >  Or the vile post you made claiming my father gets " hand jobs" from
> > me.
>
> Well, you are from the South....
>
> >  I understand that Laura did have a father fixation regarding you,
> > seeing as you are 18 years older than she, so when the reports from
> > BLM staff
>
> Did you ever come up with an actual name to go with that?

Yes.

>
> > about her going into your office at BLM with porno and
> > closing the door, well such " private" meetings what was her "job"?
>
> Could it be that your problem with L is that she ended up with BL?
> Since you don't know personally her, it stands to reason that you hate
> her for taking the place of which you see as yours.  You can't
> honestly believe for a New York minute that you ever had a chance to
> become Mrs. BL.... right?

((rolls eyes)) Goddesses Bob! Your ego actually came up with that
pathetic lie!

((Shakes head)) I have no sexual interest in you, Gollum, and never
did.

>Be honest with yourself, toodles.   Your
> sole purpose in life is as provider of southern hand jobs on a
> disabled, elderly man.

Vile lie noted.

BTW KSIC /Bob, you really should read your Bible. It condemns such
talk from a follower of Jesus Christ.

But then you never really were a born again Christian, were you Bob?
You turned to the " traveling evangelist" route after your failed "
rock star" dreams met with reality and the things you have done over
the years show a progression of disintegration, so to speak, of your
"walk with the Lord."

>
> > Your little song and dance about how I am a chicken for not
> > emailing you and the rest of your claims about me really is nothing
> > more than your posturing online farts when you show yourself,
> > ironically, to be a coward.
>
> You are to send your Skype contact.  Bawk, Bawk!

You contact me by email-- coward.

>
> >  As for ministerial credentials, Bob, a mail order diploma mill degree
> > does not make you on the same level as a person who went to seminary,
>
> What's beautiful is, BL has surpassed many who went to seminary.  God
> chose BL!

So much for humility. Kinda reminds me of the claims of cult leaders
about themselves, as well.

> So find me someone from a seminary who has a career that
> has spanned over 4 decades, lectured in more than 80 countries, had
> books translated in numerous languages, has had as many television,
> radio and print media appearances and coverage, and worked on a major
> motion picture, to name a few.

More boastings and self-praise. The simple fact is that you are a
college drop out and your ministerial degree came from a mail order
"Christian" diploma mill.

You are, according to Christians who have observed you, a false
teacher and apostate who is taking advantage of desperate and naive
people for your own financial and egotistical gain.

Grandiosity of your NPD noted.

>
> > Ashcraft has
> > told me what his ordination creds are and they are legit.
>
> Because he says so?  LOL!

Because I checked them out. Your attempts to diss him show your
desperation because you know he has some inside info on you you wish
kept hidden.

You might want to stop playing like a broken record when you do your
anonymoused attacks on him, BTW.

>
> C'mon, toodles... cut the crap :)  Why has Jakey kept the alleged
> ordination credentials from the public?  Who is his Bishop?  Is this a
> need to know situation?  How bizarre...

Not bizarre at all. You have in the past tried some dirty underhanded
tactics on those you target in your hate and the person who was
involved in Fr. Ashcraft in this matter does not need your harassment
of him.

>
> >Motal,
> > unlike you, served his country in the military.
>
> Motal.  That's the quack who claims to know the real secrets on Area
> 51 right?  He's not out there tryin' to cash-in is he?  Naaaah.  Boy,
> you really know how to pick 'em, toodles!   :)

Motal may be " out there" on some things, old man, but he was the one
who has the various videos exposing you available for the public, and
now the news media, to see and hear.

But you should talk, since you made your appearance a few times on a
nationwide overnight radio show of " out there" topics yourself.

Hypocrite much Bob?

And your current scam is certainly "out there" with good reason.

>
> > As for the amount of "girls" the "source" is your publicity, gollum. I
> > never said I had an inside source for that. I was just observing of
> > how the " original" group is missing one person, the girl with the
> > glasses.
>
> Once again, you not only illustrate how unreliable you are, but you've
> unquestionably proven that your fact-checking stinks toodles.  If you
> had been attentive, you would have known that there were originally 5
> teens, not 4.  Hard to overlook when the publicity photos are
> abound.
> Another oops moment for toodles.  :D

I addressed that one before, old man. The fact still remains, why is
the fifth one missing from the publicity whoredom you are doing?

>
> > To quote Sesame Street : " Which one is not like the others?"
>
> It is obvious that speaking to you like a 4-year-old overestimates
> your intellect by several magnitudes, toodles. . .

Ad hom noted. Now answer the question.

>
> > But thank you for the correction on the actual kitty count.
>
> And thank you for showing our audience (inadvertently) that you really
> haven't a clue as to what you're talking about.  Everytime you stray
> from the Ken Smith talking points, this inevitably happens. . .

Ad hom noted. Avoidance of answering the question noted.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 15, 5:33 pm, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:

And Bob Larson, homophobe, may be a closet homosexual in denial.

You should have heard the audiotape he made where he described how
eagerly he as to look at Elvis's crotch in Presley's first TV
appearance.

Moe

Moe

[Fred Hall]

On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:03:41 -0700 (PDT), KabukiBob <fvr...@yahoo.com>
wrote in
<c1088481-7236-4d1b...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:

I would still like to know how much Bob charges to attend his
International School of Exorcism. The coward won't answer me.

--

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html

http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 18, 5:05 am, Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:03:41 -0700 (PDT), KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com>
> wrote in
> <c1088481-7236-4d1b-ba5d-ba01d80fe...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:

You can bet he doesn't do it for free.

If his scale is like his previous "teaching" scam" it might be over
$200 per "class".

Yes he has delusions he is a professor, a teacher, when in fact he's
a party college drop out ( University of Nebraska)

Maybe one of his " courses" is how to castrate demons. And yes he
thinks all demons are male and have penises.

Moe

[Fred Hall]

On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:44:46 -0700 (PDT), KabukiBob <fvr...@yahoo.com>
wrote in
<b27cd736-e626-4eeb...@a20g2000yql.googlegroups.com>:

They don't? ;>D

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 18, 6:12 am, Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:44:46 -0700 (PDT), KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com>
> wrote in
> <b27cd736-e626-4eeb-942a-b52e94238...@a20g2000yql.googlegroups.com>:

His" theology" ( unbiblical, BTW) is that all demons are male and none
female and any demon who appears as female is in fact a male demon in
drag.

Larson is quite penis-oriented. I have a video of his verbal vomitage
on "guest" of his radio show who as a male to female transsexual.
Larson's first rude question as about his "missing" penis ( Larson,
ignorant jerk that he is, never heard of the surgical operation called
penile inversion) and referred to her as "it". He got really upset
when she revealed that she was a devout born again Christian.

Larson is quite homophobic. His reaction when he found three
beautiful women invited as guests to his radio show by Bonnie Bell
were in fact men suggested that his sexual interest in them when he
thought they were women and the shock when he found they were men ( he
threatened to vomit on the air) was part of his fear he might be gay.
One time on the air he expressed his interest in the drawings of
demons in a satanist publication-- they had big penises.

Larson in his traveling evangelist career before he started growing a
beard had very effeminate features, I should mention.

As some studies have shown, the males who are viciously homophobic
seem to under the penis meter also have signs of erections regarding
homosexual images.

Which is sad, because Paul probably was homosexual.

Moe

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:
>
> As some studies have shown, the males who are viciously homophobic
> seem to under the penis meter also have signs of erections regarding
> homosexual images.

This is no big deal. Human sexuality is a smooth spectrum, not a binary
switch.

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:
>
> Maybe one of his " courses" is how to castrate demons. And yes he
> thinks all demons are male and have penises.

I suppose he would know, having cast out hundreds of them. I can't
imagine they were wearing clothes when they came out of people like that
baby alien in Alien.

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:
>
> You should have heard the audiotape he made where he described how
> eagerly he as to look at Elvis's crotch in Presley's first TV
> appearance.
>

Mama's baby's in the heart of every schoolgirl.
Love Me Tender leaves them crying in the aisles.
The way he moved, it was a song, so sweet and true.
Always wanting more, he'd leave you longing for...

Black Velvet etc. etc.

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 18, 4:03 am, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>  The " foremost authority" claim is a lie and you know it. Bob
> Larson's name is not listed in any recent book or reference on cults
> or the occult for the past ten years.

That is simply not true. Apparently, you're not as on top of your BL
game as you'd like us all to believe :D

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 18, 4:25 am, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > >  I understand that Laura did have a father fixation regarding you,
> > > seeing as you are 18 years older than she, so when the reports from
> > > BLM staff
>
> > Did you ever come up with an actual name to go with that?
>
> Yes.

Since you've never been able to put actual names to support your
perpetuated, recycled lies, I figured I'd see if hell had frozen
over.

> >Be honest with yourself, toodles.   Your
> > sole purpose in life is as provider of southern hand jobs on a
> > disabled, elderly man.
>
> Vile lie noted.
>
> BTW KSIC /Bob, you really should read your Bible. It condemns such
> talk from a follower of Jesus Christ.

I'm just asserting an observation based strictly as an observer and
commentator. :)

> But then you never really were a born again Christian, were you Bob?

I can't speak for BL, but I am sure he would rebuke that demonic
remark in the Name of the Lord Jesus!

> > > Your little song and dance about how I am a chicken for not
> > > emailing you and the rest of your claims about me really is nothing
> > > more than your posturing online farts when you show yourself,
> > > ironically, to be a coward.
>
> > You are to send your Skype contact.  Bawk, Bawk!
>
> You contact me by email-- coward.

You've resorted to moving the goal posts with a yellow stripe showing
up and down the backside of you. Bawk, Bawk!

> > So find me someone from a seminary who has a career that
> > has spanned over 4 decades, lectured in more than 80 countries, had
> > books translated in numerous languages, has had as many television,
> > radio and print media appearances and coverage, and worked on a major
> > motion picture, to name a few.
>
> More boastings and self-praise. The simple fact is that you are a
> college drop out and your ministerial degree came from a mail order
> "Christian" diploma mill.

BL is an ambassador for Christ. Take a look at the abundance of gifts
provided by the Lord. Get it right, toodles! :)

> You are, according to Christians who have observed you, a false
> teacher and apostate

How can you possibly quote anonymous Christians with a straight face
who willfully disregard (or perhaps ignorant to) Matt. 7:1-5

> > > Ashcraft has
> > > told me what his ordination creds are and they are legit.
>
> > Because he says so?  LOL!
>
>  Because I checked them out. Your attempts to diss him show your
> desperation because you know he has some inside info on you you wish
> kept hidden.

No diss at all. I simply have called the boy's claims out. And now
the little man behind the curtain has been exposed for all to see.
Remember, the wolf in sheep's clothing worked in some capacity with KS
years and years ago. And of course we all know that it crashed and
burned and then some. Jakey doesn't have anything on BL. The "we
have inside info on BL" nonsense ran out of gas 10 years ago. :D

> > C'mon, toodles... cut the crap :)  Why has Jakey kept the alleged
> > ordination credentials from the public?  Who is his Bishop?  Is this a
> > need to know situation?  How bizarre...
>
> Not bizarre at all. You have in the past tried some dirty underhanded
> tactics on those you target in your hate and the person who was
> involved in Fr. Ashcraft in this matter does not need your harassment
> of him.

Who?? I've never done any such thing. And what hate and
harassment? Jakey is the one who has chosen to stir up a hornets
nest -- not BL. And even if what you say were true, it still
doesn't square as to why Jakey's priesthood claim is *still* a mystery
to the public. There is no ordaining bishop that has yet come
forward to claim and verify Jakey's consecration claim.

> Motal may be " out there" on some things, old man, but he was the one
> who has the various videos exposing you available for the public, and
> now the news media, to see and hear.
>
> But you should talk, since you made your appearance a few times on a
> nationwide overnight radio show of " out there" topics yourself.

BL has appeared as an expert commentator guest on nationwide overnight
radio programs to speak about exorcism. For you to compare Area 51
black-helicopter conspiracies with exorcism is really a bridge too
far. Toodles, how desperate are you?

> > Once again, you not only illustrate how unreliable you are, but
you've
> > unquestionably proven that your fact-checking stinks toodles.  If you
> > had been attentive, you would have known that there were originally 5
> > teens, not 4.  Hard to overlook when the publicity photos are
> > abound.
> > Another oops moment for toodles.  :D
>

> The fact still remains, why is
> the fifth one missing from the publicity whoredom you are doing?

Aren't you also concerned about the 4th? I don't know why not. While
your demonic inquisitiveness reveals your ignorance about the subject,
it begs the question as to why you didn't notice the 4th one missing
in addition to the 5th without asking about both. I understand that
your inattentiveness has embarrassed you -- it's not as if you haven't
done this to yourself in the past. I just think that it is important
for you to face your mistake and own up to it.

[kensmithiscool]

Any one find it interesting that Kent and Maureen Toodles have taken
to the newly created sock "linuxgal" without asking who linuxgal even
is in reference to the claim of being a alt.fan-b-l alum?

Maureen Toodles, I just told Kent the other week that responding to
his own sock is bad form. :D

[linuxgal]

kensmithiscool wrote:
>
> Any one find it interesting that Kent and Maureen Toodles have taken
> to the newly created sock "linuxgal" without asking who linuxgal even
> is in reference to the claim of being a alt.fan-b-l alum?

Teresita. They'll remember me from back in the Day.

[kensmithiscool]

Now that was a lightning-quick response! Teresita. How many other
spirits of you are there? Oh, I remember you. But what about the
new sock account? Afterall, Maureen is that intelligent enough to go
back in the archives and resurrect an old poster's handle. You see,
Maureen has lambasted me for not using the same account as of years
past. It'll be interesting to see if she applies the same level of
criticism to you.

[linuxgal]

kensmithiscool wrote:
>
> Now that was a lightning-quick response! Teresita. How many other
> spirits of you are there? Oh, I remember you. But what about the
> new sock account? Afterall, Maureen is that intelligent enough to go
> back in the archives and resurrect an old poster's handle.

Some people see Lucy in the Sky with Demonds. Other people see socks
everywhere they look. There is nothing to be done for them.

[linuxgal]

kensmithiscool wrote:

>But what about the
> new sock account? Afterall, Maureen is that intelligent enough to go
> back in the archives and resurrect an old poster's handle.

Belial took the role of an accuser, or divine prosecutor. Later the
Hebrews would call this one the ha'satan. Islam would call him Iblis,
the great Enemy of mankind. And in Christian theology, the title
ha'satan would be shortened and become a proper name: Satan.

[linuxgal]

kensmithiscool wrote:
>
> Why do you think BL
> is still to this day looked to and sought by people all over the globe
> (not just major media!) as the source, a one-stop for his expertise
> on demons and exorcism from a Christian perspective :)

That is, of course, the chief mark of a cult leader, the claim that he's
a one-stop for all your Christian needs, when he should be passing
seekers through himself to stop only when they rest in Christ Jesus.

[linuxgal]

kensmithiscool wrote:
>
> I thought BL came off with a whole lot of class...For BL to have kept

> his composure on that one alone is admirable.
>

"Bob Dole likes Bob Larson," Bob Dole said.

[Greegor]

On Mar 18, 3:36 am, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Bob, I  may have a number of faults, but
> naive and gullible are not among them.

So you knew all along that my ID of Kent was correct?
You knowingly tried to aid in Kent's deception about his ID?

Naive and gullible were your only refuges from
being complicit.

http://z.hubpages.com/u/1051348_f520.jpg

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

http://immaculatecongestion.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.alien.visitors/msg/7bb21a6718c8504c

Sun, 15 Jun 2003 03:46:12 [...]
KBW 2003 > I was born in Krakow, Poland on
KBW 2003 > Jan. 8, 1969. I grew up there, and
KBW 2003 > in the mid 80's I came to the US.


http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html

[Greegor]

Maureen the pagan leftist KOOK worships Bill Marr.
Is that a surprise in any way?

[Greegor]

Maureen > Bob, I  may have a number of faults, but
Maureen > naive and gullible are not among them.

G > So you knew all along that my ID of Kent was correct?
G > You knowingly tried to aid in Kent's deception about his ID?
G >
G > Naive and gullible were your only refuges from
G > being complicit.

http://z.hubpages.com/u/1051348_f520.jpg

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

Screen Captures further proving the ID on Kent is correct.

[KabukiBob]

True. But I do find it interesting that a scientific study indicates
that those males that profess to despise, dislike, or otherwise hate
gay males themselves have developing hard ons regarding images of gay
males being intimate.

Though frankly I STILL don't know what a" metrosexual' is. :-)

Moe

[KabukiBob]

Proof?

And by book I mean credible sources not your crap.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

Bobbie, I don't know who linuxgal is and, assuming I would use a sock
( which I have yet to do) that is most certainly not me.

And that is the truth.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 17, 7:42 pm, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:

Oh yeah, I remember you.
How are ya?

Moe

[KabukiBob]

Oh great here he goes with the "exorcism by usenet post" crap again.

Linuxgal, he tried that idiotic trick on me years ago. The Elmer
Gantry of exorcism is just showing off.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

Bingo.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

KSIC/ Bob Larson, I find it rather amusing that while you attack Rev.
Motal for his Area 51 stuff, you show that you really haven't looked
at Fr. Ashcraft's blog, have you?

Here's a hint: You might want to do a search and and the name "
Constance Cumbey" to it.

Cumbey was the lady in the early 1980s who in Christian publishing
started the anti- "new age" publishing industry with her book "Hidden
Dangers of the Rainbow". The patriarchal successors to the new
approach she created didn't want to credit a woman for starting this
cash flow, so they tend not to mention her at all, though the truth is
that without her starting it, they would not have gotten a new trick
to part suckers with their cash.

Oh, wait Bobbie, I know why you haven't done that. You only saw what
was about you.

And probably you have a short attention span, being an old pervert
and all...


Moe

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:
>
>
> Oh yeah, I remember you.
> How are ya?
>
> Moe

Great, other than the breast cancer thing.

Still trying to figure out who's who here.

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:
>
> True. But I do find it interesting that a scientific study indicates
> that those males that profess to despise, dislike, or otherwise hate
> gay males themselves have developing hard ons regarding images of gay
> males being intimate.

Well that's easy to explain. It's simple misdirection. You see it a
lot in the GOP, like in the case of former Idaho Senator Larry "Wide
Stance" Craig, who had to hold a press conference with his "wife" and
re-iterate that he was not gay because his constituents just wouldn't
understand.

> Though frankly I STILL don't know what a" metrosexual' is. :-)
>

Straight men who take care of themselves?

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:

> Bobbie, I don't know who linuxgal is and, assuming I would use a sock
> ( which I have yet to do) that is most certainly not me.
>

I'm not particularly interested in proving I'm not someone's sock.
Master Sun Tzu extolled the wisdom of allowing the opposing general to
come to the wrong conclusions about one's own disposition of forces.

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:
>
> Linuxgal, he tried that idiotic trick on me years ago. The Elmer
> Gantry of exorcism is just showing off.

Back in the old days they thought the sun was a container for light, and
the sky was made of metal, and the Earth stood on pillars, and that
people with brain infirmities were possessed by devils.

[kensmithiscool]

On Mar 19, 1:11 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Visit hell often Bob?


Bob who?


>Does your real Master have to call you to his "
> Home office"?


You use sarcasm as a diversionary tool like a pro!



>  BTW lie noted. I was the one who revealed to you the Christian book
> chapter where two of your former communicator club line operators were
> named and spoke about what really went on at BLM.


My former communicator club line operators?? Toodles, you are so
obsessed with BL that you think you're talking to BL. You really need
to take some time off from BL and seek a licensed mental health
therapist. And what's keeping you from citing the name of the
"Christian" book as well as the names of the cc line operators? As
I've told you before, you'd look somewhat credible if you dropped the
generalizations and went with actual names and verifiable sources.
But, you can't.




> You could, OC, release all your former BLM employees and Margo's
> husband from your  gag order so they can speak freely about the truth
> of BLM and of you.



First of all, what proof do you have that such gag orders exist?
Secondly, if BL ever did enact a non-disclosure with his employees, he
wouldn't have been the first employer to do so, nor the last. And
third, if you're privy to internal BLM secrets, it wouldn't be
necessary for you to want people released from "gag orders." :D

> > I'm just asserting an observation based strictly as an observer and
> > commentator. :)
>

> You observe daughters hand jobbing their fathers, Bob? Is your porn
> sickness gotten that far?



Bob who? You're the one talking about porn by perpetuating a
malicious lie that BL and his wife were in possession of porn at BLM.
Not wise, toodles.

> > > But then you never really were a born again Christian, were you Bob?
>
> > I can't speak for BL, but I am sure he would rebuke that demonic
> > remark in the Name of the Lord Jesus!
>

> You've resorted to the " I can't speak for BL" response after I
> mentioned that any legal action you tried on me would not be a one-way
> street.



When did you ever mention that? That you choose to continue to ignore
my multiple Usenet declarations over the years that BL isn't me is not
my problem, toodles. You are very sick and very obsessed, toodles!



>  Wait a second. You are not SAYING specifically you are not Bob
> Larson. You are saying you "can't speak for" BL.



Does is really have to be *that* dumbed-down for you?



> Well if you are the
> same as Larson, you are not a separate individual speaking out, OC.


Don't you think BL has better things to do than to be here slapping
you around like the bitch that you are? Just sayin'... :D



> Unless you want to try the DID defense in court Bobbie.

Toodles, your pockets aren't deep enough to go toe-to-toe with BL and
his legal counsel, and you're kidding yourself if you think
otherwise. Personally, I think you're small time, in terms of trying
to ruin BL. That's probably why you're free. But that's not for me
to determine. It would be a hoot to see you end up in the clink. You
seem to be on that path!



> Quit the posturing, old man. You know as well as I do there are
> eyewitness reports of some of your " conferences" written BY
> Christians that are highly critical of your methods and your
> unbiblical teachings.


Like BL has always said, his biggest critics tend to come from the
Christian community. Personally, I think they're green with envy...




>You forgot the HNN clip, BTW, when the pastor on
> the air called your teachings unbiblical. There is a video clip of
> that online, old man.


I like the fact that there are those so-called Christians out there
who never met a camera they didn't like who are overly-critical of
BL. It separates BL from the chaff :) BTW, there will be certain
major national media filming BL's Ministry March 26th and 27th. How
do you like them apples? ;-)



> BTW he is no " boy". He is a young man. Condescention noted.
>
>  You should know, Bob, that if you "call (his) claims out", he has a
> factor that would put the slap down on you reaaaaal quick.



I'm not aware that BL has called him out. But I've done it, and I'm
doing it again. Is he scared to get in on the conversation? [Jakey,
if you're reading this, I call on you to step forward and answer my
questions. Come put me in my place.]




> But then you are too scared to debate him on an open forum like a TV
> show appearance.

LOL! Who's scared? Where was Jakey on Anderson? What pressing
matter is more important than the rare opportunity to be on the
national stage for an hour? I don't know of anyone who would equate
BL with fear. And BL doesn't strike me as the type of fellow to allow
himself to be used by anyone's own selfish personal ambitions. That's
what I'd like to think is the answer to your laughable stupidity.

> > BL has appeared as an expert commentator guest on nationwide overnight
> > radio programs to speak about exorcism.
>

>   Appearing on "Coast to Coast AM" is not an indication of your
> credibility , Bob or your validity as a self-proclaimed "expert". Also
> you lied here in giving the false impression that your four
> appearances were all about exorcism when in fact they were not.


Really? What were the topics then? And was it really four
appearances, toodles??



>  Also I should note that Noorey has done shows on " demons" and such
> and you were absent from the discussions.


Noorey [sic] has done shows on UFOs and such and Bob Lazar was absent
from the discussions. Your point?




> Bob, at the Anderson Cooper show, only one of the original " teen
> exorcist" five was present-- your eldest daughter, And she as with her
> sisters.


At least you've confirmed here that you didn't see the program.

[KabukiBob]

(( blinks)) They are capable of doing that?

I mean,sure it would be nice to find a guy who can cook, clean, keep
himself looking presentable and not use the expensive silveware ( the
real ones) to, oh, mix paint or varnish.

But most guys are just plain children with bigger toys types.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 19, 4:34 am, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
> KabukiBob wrote:
>
> > Oh yeah, I remember you.
> >  How are ya?
>
> > Moe
>
> Great, other than the breast cancer thing.

oogh, Good luck with that one. :-(

>
> Still trying to figure out who's who here.

Right now a lot of the AFBL traffic posting is the cross posts from
AUK and the usenet kooks folks arr having some fun at Greg Hanson's
expense.

Occasionally we have Yumhuyuk, which is some idiot who pretends to
side with Bob Larson, but in all honesty I think he/she is just doing
an act.

Kensmithiscool ( now in his Google email version) is OC Bob Larson
pretending not to be Bob Larson. His posts of the recent few weeks
alone show signs of Larson's NPD ( and whom else would praise Bob
Larson and brag about his monetary possessions other than Bob Larson?)

Kent Wills is one of the former contributors to BLM until evidence
supplied by Ken Smith set him straight.

And me, well I used to Be Born Again Pagan during the "Talk Back"
radio show days.

Moe

[Greegor]

Moe > Kent Wills is one of the former contributors
Moe > to BLM until evidence supplied by Ken
Moe > Smith set him straight.

On May 1 1996 Kent posted in favor of Bob Larson.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/66c199fb3c008076
On October 11 1996 Kent is posting about how and
why he turned against Bob Larson.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/59f04bc8e90a9c60
Kent apparently didn't post in between those dates
said that he was "lurking" during that time.

Apparently Kent had some warped attitude that the
BL ministry was some sort of relief organization,
that BL had taken a vow of poverty, that BL's
house was too expensive and that the BL ministry
was supposed to hand money to KENT when Kent
had tapped out the monthly allotment from his
"protective trust fund".

Kent complained that BL ministry was GREEDY,
which is hilarious coming from him only years
before Kent's first of two thieving FELONY convictions.
Blatantly Kent was having GREED issues himself.

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 22, 3:24 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > Kent Wills is one of the former contributors
> Moe > to BLM until evidence supplied by Ken
> Moe > Smith set him straight.
>

> On May 1 1996 Kent posted in favor of Bob Larson.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/66c199fb3c008076

> On October 11 1996 Kent is posting about how and

> why he turned against Bob Larson.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/59f04bc8e90a9c60

> Kent apparently didn't post in between those dates
> said that he was "lurking" during that time.
>
> Apparently Kent had some warped attitude that the
> BL ministry was some sort of relief organization,
> that BL had taken a vow of poverty, that BL's
> house was too expensive and that the BL ministry
> was supposed to hand money to KENT when Kent
> had tapped out the monthly allotment from his
> "protective trust fund".
>
> Kent complained that BL ministry was GREEDY,
> which is hilarious coming from him only years
> before Kent's first of two thieving FELONY convictions.
> Blatantly Kent was having GREED issues himself.

Bob Larson IS greedy, that is a fact.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 19, 9:58 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 1:11 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Visit hell often Bob?
>
> Bob who?

Memory problems Bobbie?

>
> >Does your real Master have to call you to his "
> > Home office"?
>
> You use sarcasm as a diversionary tool like a pro!

Avoidance of admitting your true master is Satan noted.

You mentioned looking for hell frozen over, old crow, not me. For you
to actually observe such a thing, you would have to actually BE there.

Or are you once again bearing false witness?

>
> > BTW lie noted. I was the one who revealed to you the Christian book
> > chapter where two of your former communicator club line operators were
> > named and spoke about what really went on at BLM.
>
> My former communicator club line operators??

(( smirks)) Thanks for not putting "my" in quotes, you old college
drop out. But then you never were proficient in the English language
structure (" Senator's Agenda" showed that in a number of places, to
my amusement.)

The point is, and one you are trying to avoid , is that two of the BLM
former " communicator club" operators revealed in that book chapter
specific tactics "Bob Larson" approved of that were neither moral nor
ethical. And their accounts are only part of many accounts, including
the Christianity Today article that showed that BLM was not on the up
and up, that in fact it became a carnal world focused not on the
glory of Jesus Christ but upon what Bob Larson wanted.

> Toodles, you are so
> obsessed with BL that you think you're talking to BL.

(( rolls eyes)) I am conversing with a coward, of that I know for
sure. One who makes evasions and excuses to not email me his Skype
contact info so we can chat on Skype. One who deliberately hides his
IP address. One who worships McExorcist as much as he worships
himself.

One doesn't need to catch the duck to know the quacking, the duck
feathers and the webbed footprints that it is a duck.

> You really need
> to take some time off from BL and seek a licensed mental health
> therapist.
> And what's keeping you from citing the name of the
> "Christian" book as well as the names of the cc line operators?

Bob, I did it in my blog and here some weeks ago. Having memory
problems, old man?

Quit pretending you don't know the source and the name of the two
women who had the courage to speak up. Like when you attacked Ashcraft
on Cumbey's blog, using the same word choices and patterns as you do
here.

Just like I know that in your blog when you made your crappy little
attack on the subject of pentagrams on military grave markers, you
were trying to bait me, like you tried here.

> As
> I've told you before, you'd look somewhat credible if you dropped the
> generalizations and went with actual names and verifiable sources.
> But, you can't.

I can and did, Bob. Quit pretending otherwise, you old fraud.

>
> > You could, OC, release all your former BLM employees and Margo's
> > husband from your gag order so they can speak freely about the truth
> > of BLM and of you.
>
> First of all, what proof do you have that such gag orders exist?

Former employees.

> Secondly, if BL ever did enact a non-disclosure with his employees, he
> wouldn't have been the first employer to do so, nor the last. And
> third, if you're privy to internal BLM secrets, it wouldn't be
> necessary for you to want people released from "gag orders." :D

Ah yes, the "secrets". Nice excuse Bob, except that it doesn't work.
It looks like-- and is-- as if you had something to hide-- which you
did and still do.

If you have nothing to hide, then legally rescind the "non
disclosure" for all former BLM employees. Unless you are afraid what
they will say publicly might expose you for the fraud you are.

If you have nothing to hide, then why infer time and time again legal
action against those who criticize you?

If you, Bob Larson, have nothing to hide, why be the cowardly
anonymoused poster Kensmithiscool? Truly the Gweat and Tewwible Bobbie
E. Larson, fierce battler of " demons" can face human critics of his
teachings and about the real him. Or post as Bob Larson.

But then you do avoid the truth whenever you can.

>
> > > I'm just asserting an observation based strictly as an observer and
> > > commentator. :)
>
> > You observe daughters hand jobbing their fathers, Bob? Is your porn
> > sickness gotten that far?
>
> Bob who? You're the one talking about porn by perpetuating a
> malicious lie that BL and his wife were in possession of porn at BLM.
> Not wise, toodles.

She wasn't his wife at the time. And the story is from those who saw
the activity.

BTW, how was the " Spiritual Freedom Church's" "addiction to porn" "
counseling" you had last year? You know, the one where you told the
suckers to bring their porn for you to " dispose" of.

I should mention, pot, that while you are pointing at me that you
posted a certain vulgar sexual act reference yourself. Something that
no normal father, much less a healthy one claiming to be Christian,
would even think of, much less type it out and post it.

Hypocrite much?

>
> > > > But then you never really were a born again Christian, were you Bob?
>
> > > I can't speak for BL, but I am sure he would rebuke that demonic
> > > remark in the Name of the Lord Jesus!
>
> > You've resorted to the " I can't speak for BL" response after I
> > mentioned that any legal action you tried on me would not be a one-way
> > street.
>
> When did you ever mention that?

(( rolls eyes)) I posted it, dimit. This month.

> That you choose to continue to ignore
> my multiple Usenet declarations over the years that BL isn't me is not
> my problem, toodles. You are very sick and very obsessed, toodles!

Projection noted.

There is enough evidence from your own posts,KSIC, over the years
that you are Bob Larson hiding. How you phrase things, the tactics you
use, your focus on Ken Smith before he left this group, and so many
other things you in your arrogance, vanity and hubris let slip that
shows that Kensmithiscool is Bob Larson, obsessed, sick old man afraid
his critics who know his current BS will reveal to the public what he
tries to hide.

>
> > Wait a second. You are not SAYING specifically you are not Bob
> > Larson. You are saying you "can't speak for" BL.
>
> Does is really have to be *that* dumbed-down for you?

More like you tried to make a loophole you can jump through.

An attempt to be clever, but for you the " loop" is a noose.

>
> > Well if you are the
> > same as Larson, you are not a separate individual speaking out, OC.
>
> Don't you think BL has better things to do than to be here slapping
> you around like the bitch that you are? Just sayin'... :D

Nice cuss, "Christian". What does the Bible say about that?

I'm fortunately not YOUR " bitch." Though Gregory Hanson seems
willing to service you.

>
> > Unless you want to try the DID defense in court Bobbie.
>
> Toodles, your pockets aren't deep enough to go toe-to-toe with BL and
> his legal counsel,

And you know that how?

> and you're kidding yourself if you think
> otherwise. Personally, I think you're small time, in terms of trying
> to ruin BL.

And yet you spend SO much time on me, trying to push my buttons,
inferring that "BL" might do some legal actions on me, your claims of
an OP on me, etc, etc.

So much effort on what you claim is " small time."

I should be flattered, but mostly I'm amused as your pathetic
posturing.

I can guess why you are attempting to minimize my impact ( past,
present and future) on the con career of McExorcist.

> That's probably why you're free.

(( derisive snort)) Once again you pretend NOT to be Bob Larson yet
speak as if you know what Bob Larson thinks, does or fails to do--
while you pretend to be "just a listener."

Cut the act, Bob.

> But that's not for me
> to determine. It would be a hoot to see you end up in the clink. You
> seem to be on that path!

Irony and projection noted.

>
> > Quit the posturing, old man. You know as well as I do there are
> > eyewitness reports of some of your " conferences" written BY
> > Christians that are highly critical of your methods and your
> > unbiblical teachings.
>
> Like BL has always said, his biggest critics tend to come from the
> Christian community. Personally, I think they're green with envy...

Ah yes, your greed, vanity and self-love again. Speaking of envy, you
should talk Bob, considering one of the tapes I have here you clearly
show envy for the riches of rock stars ( a profession you failed at).

There are some Christians who have the integrity, the honor, the
ethics, to weed out the wolves pretending to be shepherds of the
flock. For awhile while at BLM you depended upon the Christian station
owners greed to keep your show on the air, until even they couldn't
ignore the various moral and ethical lapses that were staring them in
the face, the least of which was your endangering their FCC licenses
with your recut reairs pretending to be live trick.

BL pretends to be Christian. He operates his scam under the Christian
cover. Honorable, knowledgable Christians can see McExorcist is
unbiblical and a spiritual predator.

>
> >You forgot the HNN clip, BTW, when the pastor on
> > the air called your teachings unbiblical. There is a video clip of
> > that online, old man.
>
> I like the fact that there are those so-called Christians out there
> who never met a camera they didn't like who are overly-critical of
> BL.

Interesting that BL seems cowardly to face such critics and when he
DID, he later runs off and ad hom attacks the host, etc. 'Whah Whah,
whah, the host didn't kiss my feet!'

> It separates BL from the chaff :)

It shows BL is hiding something.

> BTW, there will be certain
> major national media filming BL's Ministry March 26th and 27th. How
> do you like them apples? ;-)

Gee, for a guy claiming not to be Bob Larson, you sure know before he
announces it what he'll be on!

(( rolls eyes)) Bob, you forget the old saying about counting
chickens. You boasted and bragged about being on the Nighline Beyond
Reality segment yet we=hen it aired you were not on-- and you whined
and ad hommed about THAT one as well, like a spoiled brat.

As I've told you before, media attention does not equate credibility.
You are running your current freak show to promote yet another
desperate attempt to have a TV series centered on you.

>
> > BTW he is no " boy". He is a young man. Condescention noted.
>
> > You should know, Bob, that if you "call (his) claims out", he has a
> > factor that would put the slap down on you reaaaaal quick.
>
> I'm not aware that BL has called him out.

(( rolls eyes)) Yes you have, Bob.

> But I've done it, and I'm
> doing it again. Is he scared to get in on the conversation? [Jakey,
> if you're reading this, I call on you to step forward and answer my
> questions. Come put me in my place.]

Oh that reminds me of the " Linda exorcism" you did on your radio
show where I called in, derailed your crap and you repeatedly on the
air yammered in your " send me money" spewage " put this Pagan in her
place."

I really need to select which version of your rant to use. There as
easily two dozen I recorded. ;-)

>
> > But then you are too scared to debate him on an open forum like a TV
> > show appearance.
>
> LOL! Who's scared?

You clearly are.

> Where was Jakey on Anderson? What pressing
> matter is more important than the rare opportunity to be on the
> national stage for an hour?

He had something important to take care of, Bob. Yes, not everyone
drops everything and worships at the altar of Bob Larson.

BTW you did show a contradiction there, old man. Considering your
earlier dissing of " Christians that attack BL",interestingly enough
Fr. Ashcraft disproves your vain little ad hom claim.

I should mention that on his blog he challenged Bob Larson to debate
with him in a public broadcast. You seem to have " forgotten" that
fact.

> I don't know of anyone who would equate
> BL with fear.

We're not afraid of you Bob, but you show your cowardice and your fear-
anger reaction when confronted by one of us on a public forum.

> And BL doesn't strike me as the type of fellow to allow
> himself to be used by anyone's own selfish personal ambitions.

"Cuz he has so much of his OWN SELFISH AMBITIONS.....

(( chuckling))

> That's
> what I'd like to think is the answer to your laughable stupidity.

Ad hom noted. Pathetic excuse for how Larson reacted on AC noted.

>
> > > BL has appeared as an expert commentator guest on nationwide overnight
> > > radio programs to speak about exorcism.
>
> > Appearing on "Coast to Coast AM" is not an indication of your
> > credibility , Bob or your validity as a self-proclaimed "expert". Also
> > you lied here in giving the false impression that your four
> > appearances were all about exorcism when in fact they were not.
>
> Really? What were the topics then? And was it really four
> appearances, toodles??

Don't you know?

>
> > Also I should note that Noorey has done shows on " demons" and such
> > and you were absent from the discussions.
>
> Noorey [sic]

That is how his name is spelled, Bob.

>has done shows on UFOs and such and Bob Lazar was absent
> from the discussions. Your point?

The " foremost authority" claim is bogus.

Been reinvited to the 700 Club yet, Bob?

Been back on Maher's show?

The Crouches waiting for you to show them a new show they can air on
their network, Bob?

Or are you once again having a memory lapse as to your own "burned
bridges" dwindling media venues, Bob?

>
> > Bob, at the Anderson Cooper show, only one of the original " teen

> > exorcist" five was present-- your eldest daughter, And she was with her

> > sisters.
>
> At least you've confirmed here that you didn't see the program.

More like I was putting out a deception to see if you would take the
bait at my " mistake"-- and you did.

I do find it interesting that the broads had the same hairstyle and
clothes. Rather Stepford Wives of them.

Or typical of a cult.

Moe

[Greegor]

Moe > Though frankly I STILL don't know what a" metrosexual' is. :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bab-2F_DHLY

> > Straight men who take care of themselves?

Obsessively and almost effeminately so.

Most men would say that Metrosexuals are WAY too
obsessed with looking the way women want them to look.

I guess you could say they are the male counterpart
of the female bimbo.

> (( blinks)) They are capable of doing that?
>
> I mean,sure it would be nice to find a guy who can cook, clean, keep
> himself looking presentable and not use the expensive silveware ( the
> real ones) to, oh, mix paint or varnish.
>
> But most guys are just plain children with bigger toys types.

Please display more of your male hatred, Maureen.

You expected the good ones would want to date
a grown woman who lives in her Daddy Frank's house
and has to do ...bathroom duty?

Yep, bring another roll.

Bimbo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsEteYRzbq0

Metrosexual
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0OB3D3s0sk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bab-2F_DHLY

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 19, 9:58 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 19, 1:11 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

(( snipped for brevity))

>
> >  BTW lie noted. I was the one who revealed to you the Christian book
> > chapter where two of your former communicator club line operators were
> > named and spoke about what really went on at BLM.
>
> My former communicator club line operators??  Toodles, you are so
> obsessed with BL that you think you're talking to BL.  You really need
> to take some time off from BL and seek a licensed mental health
> therapist.  And what's keeping you from citing the name of the
> "Christian" book as well as the names of the cc line operators?  As
> I've told you before, you'd look somewhat credible if you dropped the
> generalizations and went with actual names and verifiable sources.
> But, you can't.

I did way back last August, Bobbie.

My Aug. 6, 2011 blog entry:

http://foreverknightfa.livejournal.com/99645.html

WorldMag.com WORLD Magazine / Telling the Truth / Chapter Seven
Investigating and Profiling

http://www.worldmag.com/world/olasky/truthc7.html
>


Old man, don't blame me for your memory problem. You overlooked your
mention in " The Devil Wears Nada" as well.

OOopsie!!!

:-D
Moe

[Greegor]

> And me, well I used to Be Born Again Pagan during the "Talk Back"
> radio show days.

Why don't you list all of your other AKA's, Maureen?

Let your freak flag fly!

[Greegor]

Moe > Bob Larson IS greedy, that is a fact.

Says misfit Maureen McAllister the Brain Surgeon!
..Sitting in her Daddy Frank's house in Dardanelle Arkansas.

But WHY did KENT accuse BL of greed just a few years
before Kent got himself convicted for theft and burglary
felonies and a misd for using a teen on the burglary?

Do you think the Weiben family of 526 NE 15th Street
in Ankeny Iowa would consider Kent to be GREEDY?

Do you think Sean M Bilyeu's parents might consider
Kent Wills to have been a bit GREEDY when he used
their son as an accomplice to a felony garage burglary?

Why did Kent want MONEY from BL ministries when
Kent had a "protected trust fund" (spendthrift) to keep
him from blowing the family money?

What non-essential was it that the trust fund
manager would not give Kent money for?

Magic Beans? Drugs? Computer Hardware?
Internet Services? Who knows?

Certainly it's amusing that misfit Kent, living off a trust
fund would turn to THIEVING and Burglarizing a Garage,
and using a teen as an accomplice.

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 22, 5:02 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > Kent Wills is one of the former contributors
> Moe > to BLM until evidence supplied by Ken
> Moe > Smith set him straight.
>

> On May 1 1996 Kent posted in favor of Bob Larson.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/66c199fb3c008076

> On October 11 1996 Kent is posting about how and

> why he turned against Bob Larson.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/59f04bc8e90a9c60

Your obsession about Kent noted. Mo we'll see if KSIC applies the same
standards to you as he tried on me.

My bet is KSIC won't make a peep about it, much less condemn Hanson,
the wife abuser and child abuser bum.

Moe

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 22, 4:37 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > Though frankly I STILL don't know what a" metrosexual' is. :-)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bab-2F_DHLY
>
> > > Straight men who take care of themselves?
>
> Obsessively and almost effeminately so.
>
> Most men would say that Metrosexuals are WAY too
> obsessed with looking the way women want them to look.
>
> I guess you could say they are the male counterpart
> of the female bimbo.
>
> > (( blinks)) They are capable of doing that?
>
> > I mean,sure it would be nice to find a guy who can cook, clean, keep
> > himself looking presentable and not use the expensive silveware ( the
> > real ones) to, oh, mix paint or varnish.
>
> > But most guys are just plain children with bigger toys types.
>
> Please display more of your male hatred, Maureen.

I like men. Males are not men.

Hatred of you is a rational response, child abuser.

>
> You expected the good ones would want to date
> a grown woman who lives in her Daddy Frank's house
> and has to do   ...bathroom duty?

Lies noted.

Considering your living arrangement with a woman whose daughter you
made CPS get out of her home and some of the rather crappy things you
DID to the girl and how you were arrested twice for abusing your ex-
wife, you are one to talk about such a thing.

I have a BF, BTW, a nice one. The post you are trying to jack off on
was a joke about how "uncultivated" men can be.

>
> Yep, bring another roll.

Juvenile comment noted.

BT gaggie, your drug abused addled brain and your physical appearance
are hardly babe magnets, though you claimed while as a taxi driver
women offered themselves to you as fare payment.

That must be where you got your diseased scrotum..

Moe

[Greegor]

Chi-Li - Kowka
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eX8vvVKr8Q

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:

> Kensmithiscool ( now in his Google email version) is OC Bob Larson
> pretending not to be Bob Larson. His posts of the recent few weeks
> alone show signs of Larson's NPD ( and whom else would praise Bob
> Larson and brag about his monetary possessions other than Bob Larson?)

Thanks for the round-up. I kind of got dragged over to a.f.b-l from
the crossposts in alt.religion.christian.calvary-chapel, where I was in
the 1997-2001 time frame. As for monetary possessions...

HEB 11:

[24] By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the
son of Pharaoh's daughter;

[25] Choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than
to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season;

[26] Esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures
in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompence of the reward.

[Greegor]

> > Moe > Kent Wills is one of the former contributors
> > Moe > to BLM until evidence supplied by Ken
> > Moe > Smith set him straight.

> > On May 1 1996 Kent posted in favor of Bob Larson.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/66c199fb3c008076
> > On October 11 1996 Kent is posting about how and
> > why he turned against Bob Larson.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/59f04bc8e90a9c60
> > Kent apparently didn't post in between those dates
> > said that he was "lurking" during that time.

> > Apparently Kent had some warped attitude that the
> > BL ministry was some sort of relief organization,
> > that BL had taken a vow of poverty, that BL's
> > house was too expensive and that the BL ministry
> > was supposed to hand money to KENT when Kent
> > had tapped out the monthly allotment from his
> > "protective trust fund".

> > Kent complained that BL ministry was GREEDY,
> > which is hilarious coming from him only years
> > before Kent's first of two thieving FELONY convictions.
> > Blatantly Kent was having GREED issues himself.

Moe > Bob Larson IS greedy, that is a fact.

G > Says misfit Maureen McAllister the Brain Surgeon!
G > ..Sitting in her Daddy Frank's house in Dardanelle Arkansas.

> > But WHY did KENT accuse BL of greed just a few years
> > before Kent got himself convicted for theft and burglary
> > felonies and a misd for using a teen on the burglary?
>
> > Do you think the Weiben family of 526 NE 15th Street
> > in Ankeny Iowa would consider Kent to be GREEDY?
>
> > Do you think Sean M Bilyeu's parents might consider
> > Kent Wills to have been a bit GREEDY when he used
> > their son as an accomplice to a felony garage burglary?
>
> > Why did Kent want MONEY from BL ministries when
> > Kent had a "protected trust fund" (spendthrift) to keep
> > him from blowing the family money?
>
> > What non-essential was it that the trust fund
> > manager would not give Kent money for?
>
> > Magic Beans?   Drugs?   Computer Hardware?
> > Internet Services?   Who knows?
>
> > Certainly it's amusing that misfit Kent, living off a trust
> > fund would turn to THIEVING and Burglarizing a Garage,
> > and using a teen as an accomplice.

> Your obsession about Kent noted.
> Mo we'll see if KSIC applies the same
> standards to you as he tried on me.

I haven't called in to BL's radio show and I would not stutter.

> My bet is KSIC won't make a peep about it,
> much less condemn Hanson,
> the wife abuser and child abuser bum.

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg

http://secure.public-records-now.com/summary.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=maureen&ln=mcallister&city=dardanelle&state=AR

Why does it list Michael McAllister as an AKA of yours, Moe?

http://secure.public-records-now.com/summary.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=frank&ln=mcallister&city=dardanelle&state=AR

[Greegor]

> >Moe > Kent Wills is one of the former contributors
> >Moe > to BLM until evidence supplied by Ken
> >Moe > Smith set him straight.
>

> [snip your C&P of your previous post]
>
>      Are you really so hard up to post about me you've been reduced to
> copying your work over and over?

Like your long sig full of lies about me, Kent?

>      Oh wait, you've already PROVED you are.

>
> >Blatantly Kent was having GREED issues himself.
>
> >Moe > Bob Larson IS greedy, that is a fact.
>
> >Says misfit Maureen McAllister the Brain Surgeon!
> >..Sitting in her Daddy Frank's house in Dardanelle Arkansas.

>      Is that the house located in a place where cable access is not
> available?  Since you openly, though accidentally, acknowledged that
> Moe had cable access (you asked if it had been disconnected), there is
> no possible way the location you claim could have been Moe's.
>      If Moe lived there, she couldn't have cable access.  If she
> couldn't have cable access, it couldn't have been disconnected.
>      Your lie is exposed again. Again you allow me to PROVE you the
> liar you are.

Nice try!

> >But WHY did KENT accuse BL of greed just a few years
> >before Kent got himself convicted for theft and burglary
> >felonies and a misd for using a teen on the burglary?

>      Since the person who was so convicted isn't here to answer, your
> question servers only to prove you are as mentally unbalanced as you
> present.

Yes, it's just an amazing COINCIDENCE that you
took an extended hiatus from your usenet addiction
right around the time "that other guy" was in jail,
court and the halfway house!

> >Do you think the Weiben family of 526 NE 15th Street
> >in Ankeny Iowa would consider Kent to be GREEDY?
>

>      They might.  They might not.
>      Why don't you ask them?  You felt it necessary to post their home
> address to Usenet (are they a part of Witch Hunt by chance?  I'm
> trying to figure out why you would post their address, since they have
> never done anything to you.), so getting their home phone number
> should be very easy for you.

(I snipped their phone number)

>      Yours is NOT the behavior of the mentally sound, Greg.

All of your opponents are mentally imbalanced, right Kent?

G > Do you think Sean M Bilyeu's parents might consider

>      Is this the same Sean who is a juvenile female who kinda looks
> male?  You posted a link to her Facebook page how many times?  Was it
> 20?  25?
>      How many times did you PROVE you were, and probably are, OBSESSED
> with her?
>      Serious question, Greg.

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973

Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985
Age 26

I am curious why you even tried this idiotic deception, Kent.

What possible benefit would you derive from
this assenine deception that the teen you used
as an accomplice was female?

G > Do you think Sean M Bilyeu's parents might consider
G > Kent Wills to have been a bit GREEDY when he used
G > their son as an accomplice to a felony garage burglary?

>      Ask them.
>      And why isn't their home address worthy of posting?

> >Why did Kent want MONEY from BL ministries when

>      When did I ask BLM for money? Or do you mean the other Kent?
>      You do jump around a great deal.

That's why you decided BL was GREEDY.
You wanted some money to "help you out".
( Buying magic beans or whatever.. )

> >Kent had a "protected trust fund" (spendthrift) to keep
> >him from blowing the family money?

>      Lindsay and I have a trust, but it's not a trust fund.
>      But if your claims that everything I post about you is a lie, and
> I have this trust fund, why aren't you taking legal action?

That's a two way sttreet, Kent!
Why haven't you filed suit or any Police charges on me?

Do you think Clayton can figure it out?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q83Jqd2h0Yg

>  I cited
> several cases where spendthrift trusts were ordered to be paid to
> plaintiff for libel and other matters.  Your LIE about them being
> judgment proof was exposed.

Another lie.
You never posted any such caselaw, Kent.

>      The real reason is that everything I write about you is 100%
true
> and accurate. And there's nothing you can do about it now.
>     And to think, the bulk of your misdeeds were unknown.  Had you not
> been so OBSESSED with me that you HAD to follow me all over Usenet,
> they might still be hidden. Now it's all out there.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-hwnUOzzSSmU/Tffe3oZiKfI/AAAAAAAAAII/DHzvdgAKAP8/Kent%252520Bradley%252520Wills%252520as%252520Marlboro%252520man%252520img_0271.jpg

>     According to Bit Rot, there's a healthy amount of information I
> didn't find.  To be fair, I didn't invest much time in searching.
> While it's clear I am the single most important aspect of your life,
> you are nothing to me outside of Usenet fodder.

Delayed by one week? In 2012? Really? LOL

> >What non-essential was it that the trust fund
> >manager would not give Kent money for?
>

>      I'd need a trust fund first.

How about the Wills Family Trust listed in some
real estate records, Kent?

>      As of my writing this, you've offered nothing but your own claims
> that I have one.

IOW You deny it no matter how easy it is to independently verify.

http://gis.co.benton.ar.us/website/basemap/viewer.htm

Scroll to bottom right OWNER NAME input and type in
Wills Family Trust and hit enter.
Or put in a name of Wills, or put a parcel ID like
02-00444-000 or 15-09938-000 in the blank
marked parcel ID and then hit enter.

15-09938-000 WILLS FAMILY TRUST-FRED A JR & JANET R
8250 WILLS CT 57390 14-19-28

Kent Bradley Wills, 1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas 72756-5520
County parcel # 02-00444-000 (Owned by Kent's folks Fred and Janet.)


> And since I PROVE you a liar most every day, no one,
> save your sock puppets, would believe you without evidence.
>      Why not provide that now?

>
> >Magic Beans?   Drugs?   Computer Hardware?
> >Internet Services?   Who knows?
>

>      It's your delusion, so you should know.

No, it's a puzzle just WHY a guy with a "spendthrift trust"
would resort to THIEVERY.

Then again, your parents KNOW something about your
brain disorders and addictions that I do not.

> >Certainly it's amusing that misfit Kent, living off a trust
> >fund would turn to THIEVING and Burglarizing a Garage,
> >and using a teen as an accomplice.

>      I'm still waiting for something, ANYTHING, that supports, if not
> proves, your claim that I'm paid anything from any trust fund.

The mere existance of the "WILLS FAMILY TRUST" which
you denied yet it shows up in real estate records?

Anybody can Google " Janet Wills Assets Alliance " to see
that your Mommy has some expertise on money management.

>  You've
> been asked to provide your evidence MANY times.  You've offered
> nothing.
>      And the trust Lin and I have isn't a trust fund.  It doesn't pay
> anyone anything.

>      Have Lisa read up on trusts and how they work.  Then she can dumb
> it down to a level you might understand.
>      Sorry to ruin your lie before you could present it, but I figured
> I'd save you some time on presenting it.

Google " Janet Wills Assets Alliance "

How pathetic that your own parents had
to cope with your incompetence when they
set up your inheritance. They did the right
thing by setting you up with a protective
trust to keep you from blowing the family
fortune on magic beans.

Was your Mom an expert on estate planning
before they had to set up your trust or
was the need to set up your trust what got
her started as an estate planner, Kent?