i know this maybe not the place to talk about this, but just wanted to bring everybody attention on this. We all know ( or i just assume we do ) that joomla's default media browser and media manager sucks and suck hard. So I was wondering is it possible to make that in future joomla version you could change that well for example to JCE media editor ? and adding main image to the joomla article would not be such impossible thing to do as it is now :)
and anyways what is logic having editor with its media editor and media browser, teaching you client how to use it and then showing joomla's default media browser and how to add images on it again...
> i know this maybe not the place to talk about this, but just wanted to
> bring everybody attention on this.
> We all know ( or i just assume we do ) that joomla's default media
> browser
> and media manager sucks and suck hard. So I was wondering is it possible
> to make that in future joomla version you could change that well for
> example to JCE media editor ? and adding main image to the joomla
> article
> would not be such impossible thing to do as it is now :)
> and anyways what is logic having editor with its media editor and media
> browser, teaching you client how to use it and then showing joomla's
> default media browser and how to add images on it again...
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/BNk0CHvaP-sJ.
> To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-dev-cms+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms?hl=en-GB.
> You should talk to JCE's developer about potentially adding JCE's features > to the Joomla core :)
> Kind regards, > Nick
> > i know this maybe not the place to talk about this, but just wanted to > > bring everybody attention on this. > > We all know ( or i just assume we do ) that joomla's default media > > browser > > and media manager sucks and suck hard. So I was wondering is it > possible > > to make that in future joomla version you could change that well for > > example to JCE media editor ? and adding main image to the joomla > > article > > would not be such impossible thing to do as it is now :)
> > and anyways what is logic having editor with its media editor and > media > > browser, teaching you client how to use it and then showing joomla's > > default media browser and how to add images on it again...
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Joomla! CMS Development" group. > > To view this discussion on the web, visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/BNk0CHvaP-sJ. > > To post to this group, send an email to joomla-...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>.
I wasn't joking :) Why would we take someone's work without their consent
and add it to the Joomla core? If you want JCE's features in the core,
talk to JCE's developer about potentially adding it.
> funny :) but come on maybe some plugin could do the trick ?
> 2012 m. rugpjūtis 21 d., antradienis 17:34:34 UTC+3, Nick Savov rašė:
>> Hi Andrewas,
>> You should talk to JCE's developer about potentially adding JCE's
>> features
>> to the Joomla core :)
>> Kind regards,
>> Nick
>> > i know this maybe not the place to talk about this, but just wanted to
>> > bring everybody attention on this.
>> > We all know ( or i just assume we do ) that joomla's default media
>> > browser
>> > and media manager sucks and suck hard. So I was wondering is it
>> possible
>> > to make that in future joomla version you could change that well for
>> > example to JCE media editor ? and adding main image to the joomla
>> > article
>> > would not be such impossible thing to do as it is now :)
>> > and anyways what is logic having editor with its media editor and
>> media
>> > browser, teaching you client how to use it and then showing joomla's
>> > default media browser and how to add images on it again...
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
>> > To view this discussion on the web, visit
>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/BNk0CHvaP-sJ.
>> > To post to this group, send an email to
>> joomla-...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/DH88PPOlDHcJ.
> To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-dev-cms+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms?hl=en-GB.
We're really looking forward to being able to improve it for everyone. If
you can provide some code to make it better, that would be greatly
appreciated!
> joomla default media browser is one of the reasons, why joomla is not yet
> winning cms battle
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/Lwu90aAIN20J.
> To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-dev-cms+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms?hl=en-GB.
> We're really looking forward to being able to improve it for everyone. If
> you can provide some code to make it better, that would be greatly
> appreciated!
> Let us know if you have any questions on the process.
> Kind regards,
> Nick
> > joomla default media browser is one of the reasons, why joomla is not yet
> > winning cms battle
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
> > To view this discussion on the web, visit
> >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/Lwu90aAIN20J.
> > To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > joomla-dev-cms+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms?hl=en-GB.
About JCE Media Manager: Wasn't there an approach to using JCE in core and Ryan refused ? I don't think that there's a difference for his Media Manager. And i respect his dicison.
There was as GSOC project these year for rebuild com_media. But unfortunately i can't see any progress.
Look, I didn't want to post in annoyance the other day either about language or about the fact that your post insults people's work. Please keep in mind that this is a professional list that represents this project and will be in Google forever.
This is an open source community driven project. The "people" you mention are *you* as is 'joomla". If you want a new media manager you need to code it or pay someone to code it, sign the JCA confirming that it is your original code not someone else's (and not code that is providing someone with their livelihood that is for sure) and contribute it. It's that simple.
You can't expect other people to do it for you any more than I can expect you to do the development I am most interested in seeing. You say you have clients .. to me that implies you have income so think about using part of it to create the media manager you want that would make your life better. It's that simple.
Also, this is the CMS development mailing list which means it is for people actively working on developing the core cms. By posting here you are really implying that this is a project you are considering taking on yourself. If that's the case then I'm sorry that I'm misinterpreting your posts. If you want to make feature requests those in fact belong on http://ideas.joomla.org not this list.
@Nils
There was an idea for a media manager GSoC project but no project. There are about 3x as many ideas as projects which is as it should be.
But that list is also a great list of things for anyone to do that would be wonderful contributions to the Joomla core. If GSoC happens next year we can have it on the list again but at some point I hope people will come to understand that counting on Google to fund core development is highly problematic in so many ways, although it is great when we have it and have such great student developers as we had this summer.
@Piotr
It's a large project and we needed the JImage package to really do it right so I think a number of efforts have died out. It would be great for someone to take it on, but they need to expect to spend several solid months on it to really do it right. In the meantime there is always the ability to contribute incremental improvements such as was done with the uploader.
@Elin your right lets find out where JImage platform package left off. First we need this and other packages that would support a great media manager. This should be a discussion about needed core functionality then comes user experience....
@Andrewas besides it sucking and needing to use jce in articles what other improvements do you suggest?
*Here are some of my suggestions:* client side image processing as much as possible. distributed storage/media server support: example amazon aws. tagging to improve image search drag and drop management w pad friendly buttons. batch management optional watermarks db driven back end optional google docs integration optional gps location meta on uploads new interface using bootstrap - of course better access control and seperation of user provided media.
What about suggestions to the media manager in the context of the wysiwyg in articles/content?
We all know its a pain unless you use jce so lets borrow some UX from jce, and joomlaize it. The Joomla 3 media manager is an ok starting point, has anyone seen any better working attempts at replacing media manager?
Should we look at adding a table to store media information ( media) since that is built into the media fields already (including created_by and date)? That would really let us make some progress on access control/ownership. Also, with the new packages from the GSoC students we'll have access to Picasa and FB images. It would be so great if someone would take up writing a package for for AWS to go with all the other ones that are being worked on.
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 6:45:10 PM UTC-4, RC3 Media wrote:
> @Elin your right lets find out where JImage platform package left off. > First we need this and other packages that would support a great media > manager. This should be a discussion about needed core functionality then > comes user experience....
> @Andrewas besides it sucking and needing to use jce in articles what > other improvements do you suggest?
> *Here are some of my suggestions:* > client side image processing as much as possible. > distributed storage/media server support: example amazon aws. > tagging to improve image search > drag and drop management w pad friendly buttons. > batch management > optional watermarks > db driven back end > optional google docs integration > optional gps location meta on uploads > new interface using bootstrap - of course > better access control and seperation of user provided media.
> What about suggestions to the media manager in the context of the wysiwyg > in articles/content?
> We all know its a pain unless you use jce so lets borrow some UX from jce, > and joomlaize it. The Joomla 3 media manager is an ok starting point, has > anyone seen any better working attempts at replacing media manager?
These are quite a few suggestions.
I think we'd need to think about the base for the component, so it's
extensible with suggestions you added.
As Elin wrote, com_media revamp is quite complex and I'd be rather
minimalistic at the start. There's lot of great functionality that may
be added (maybe even via com_media plugins), but.. we should be
careful about feature creep.
Besides new JImage package (lot's of possibilities!), there's new
JFilesystem, relevant GSoC 2012 packages and jQuery :( as base JS
framework.
It would be great if somebody from community would step up to the role
of 'com_media revamper', set up GitHub branch and make contact with
ux.joomla.org community. I'm pretty sure this is not a task for 1-2
people, maybe that's why previous attempts kind of failed.
We need some smart and extendable architecture, minimal set of
features and a realistic plan.
On Aug 24, 12:45 am, RC3 Media <rcela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Elin your right lets find out where JImage platform package left off.
> First we need this and other packages that would support a great media
> manager. This should be a discussion about needed core functionality then
> comes user experience....
> @Andrewas besides it sucking and needing to use jce in articles what other
> improvements do you suggest?
> *Here are some of my suggestions:*
> client side image processing as much as possible.
> distributed storage/media server support: example amazon aws.
> tagging to improve image search
> drag and drop management w pad friendly buttons.
> batch management
> optional watermarks
> db driven back end
> optional google docs integration
> optional gps location meta on uploads
> new interface using bootstrap - of course
> better access control and seperation of user provided media.
> What about suggestions to the media manager in the context of the wysiwyg
> in articles/content?
> We all know its a pain unless you use jce so lets borrow some UX from jce,
> and joomlaize it. The Joomla 3 media manager is an ok starting point, has
> anyone seen any better working attempts at replacing media manager?
What I'm missing most is the ability to manage non-image media (like
pdfs/ mp3s) trough frontend and some basic management actions in
frontend (delete & rename files, work with directories)
I wouldn't use DB tables for file/ directory properties (created/
modified date) to avoid possible conflicts when uploading files
outside media manager (ftp/ upload extension/ api). Besides this looks
like overengineering to me.
> These are quite a few suggestions.
> I think we'd need to think about the base for the component, so it's
> extensible with suggestions you added.
> As Elin wrote, com_media revamp is quite complex and I'd be rather
> minimalistic at the start. There's lot of great functionality that may
> be added (maybe even via com_media plugins), but.. we should be
> careful about feature creep.
> Besides new JImage package (lot's of possibilities!), there's new
> JFilesystem, relevant GSoC 2012 packages and jQuery :( as base JS
> framework.
> It would be great if somebody from community would step up to the role
> of 'com_media revamper', set up GitHub branch and make contact with
> ux.joomla.org community. I'm pretty sure this is not a task for 1-2
> people, maybe that's why previous attempts kind of failed.
> We need some smart and extendable architecture, minimal set of
> features and a realistic plan.
> On Aug 24, 12:45 am, RC3 Media <rcela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > @Elin your right lets find out where JImage platform package left off.
> > First we need this and other packages that would support a great media
> > manager. This should be a discussion about needed core functionality then
> > comes user experience....
> > @Andrewas besides it sucking and needing to use jce in articles what other
> > improvements do you suggest?
> > *Here are some of my suggestions:*
> > client side image processing as much as possible.
> > distributed storage/media server support: example amazon aws.
> > tagging to improve image search
> > drag and drop management w pad friendly buttons.
> > batch management
> > optional watermarks
> > db driven back end
> > optional google docs integration
> > optional gps location meta on uploads
> > new interface using bootstrap - of course
> > better access control and seperation of user provided media.
> > What about suggestions to the media manager in the context of the wysiwyg
> > in articles/content?
> > We all know its a pain unless you use jce so lets borrow some UX from jce,
> > and joomlaize it. The Joomla 3 media manager is an ok starting point, has
> > anyone seen any better working attempts at replacing media manager?
You could have a cron and button to import the way most of the document managers and galleries do. I think there are a lot of circumstances where you want to have ownership and tracking of media especially if you are using it for more than images e.g. pdfs and want to be able to have workflow around them or if you want to have the option for image approval.
On Friday, August 24, 2012 8:58:18 AM UTC-4, piotr_cz wrote:
> What I'm missing most is the ability to manage non-image media (like > pdfs/ mp3s) trough frontend and some basic management actions in > frontend (delete & rename files, work with directories)
> I wouldn't use DB tables for file/ directory properties (created/ > modified date) to avoid possible conflicts when uploading files > outside media manager (ftp/ upload extension/ api). Besides this looks > like overengineering to me.
> On Aug 24, 1:52 pm, piotr_cz <pkoniec...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > These are quite a few suggestions. > > I think we'd need to think about the base for the component, so it's > > extensible with suggestions you added. > > As Elin wrote, com_media revamp is quite complex and I'd be rather > > minimalistic at the start. There's lot of great functionality that may > > be added (maybe even via com_media plugins), but.. we should be > > careful about feature creep.
> > Besides new JImage package (lot's of possibilities!), there's new > > JFilesystem, relevant GSoC 2012 packages and jQuery :( as base JS > > framework.
> > It would be great if somebody from community would step up to the role > > of 'com_media revamper', set up GitHub branch and make contact with > > ux.joomla.org community. I'm pretty sure this is not a task for 1-2 > > people, maybe that's why previous attempts kind of failed.
> > We need some smart and extendable architecture, minimal set of > > features and a realistic plan.
> > On Aug 24, 12:45 am, RC3 Media <rcela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > @Elin your right lets find out where JImage platform package left off. > > > First we need this and other packages that would support a great media > > > manager. This should be a discussion about needed core functionality > then > > > comes user experience....
> > > @Andrewas besides it sucking and needing to use jce in articles what > other > > > improvements do you suggest?
> > > *Here are some of my suggestions:* > > > client side image processing as much as possible. > > > distributed storage/media server support: example amazon aws. > > > tagging to improve image search > > > drag and drop management w pad friendly buttons. > > > batch management > > > optional watermarks > > > db driven back end > > > optional google docs integration > > > optional gps location meta on uploads > > > new interface using bootstrap - of course > > > better access control and seperation of user provided media.
> > > What about suggestions to the media manager in the context of the > wysiwyg > > > in articles/content?
> > > We all know its a pain unless you use jce so lets borrow some UX from > jce, > > > and joomlaize it. The Joomla 3 media manager is an ok starting point, > has > > > anyone seen any better working attempts at replacing media manager?
