Support for Firefox 3.5? - Gears Users

Message from discussion Support for Firefox 3.5?

Explorer5

More options Jun 30, 11:12 pm

From: Explorer5 <andrew.ca...@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:12:55 -0700 (PDT)

Local: Tues, Jun 30 2009 11:12 pm

Subject: Re: Support for Firefox 3.5?

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

Or imagine if Google put out a new version of Chrome and Gears didn't
work... Sounds to me like Google is trying to do what it can to push
users to Chrome. The fact that they claim they'd have to do an update
for ever RC is ridiculous, the whole point of an RC's is that its
practically feature complete and its to check for last minute bugs. I
cant picture each RC being so different that they'd have to do some
major code re-writing.

On Jun 30, 10:57 am, Garret <gar...@globalmentor.com> wrote:

> I just upgraded to the official Firefox 3.5, and Google Gears was
> disabled. Can you imagine of upgrading to Firefox 3.5 disabled Flash?
> Not a good step, Google.

> Garret

> On Jun 29, 7:13 pm, Jon <hasta...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Thanks for the response Aaron. Previous advice from Google in
> > searching this thread was that you updated for the RC.

> > It's good to know we'll have it soon. It looks like final release of
> > Firefox 3.5 is due in the next day or so.

> > On Jun 30, 2:30 am, Aaron Boodman <a...@google.com> wrote:

> > > We're working on pushing out a new Gears version that support FF 3.5.

> > > We typically wait until the official "gold" release of Firefox is
> > > pushed, because otherwise, we keep having to do new builds everytime a
> > > new RC is pushed.

> > > - a (Google)

> > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Jon<hasta...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > I'm starting to think we may see a new version of the Google Apps
> > > > suite (Docs, Gmail, etc) that support Gears supporting HTML 5 rather
> > > > than a Gears release for a HTML 5 capable browser.

> > > > It would still be nice to get some official word from Google on what
> > > > the plan is here though.

Reply to author Forward