Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
More of my philosophy about economy and about president Erdogan and about Islam and more..
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Amine Moulay Ramdane
Dec 24, 2021, 3:04:58 PM12/24/21
to
Hello,
More of my philosophy about economy and about president Erdogan and about Islam and more..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I invite you to read the following article about president Erdogan:
Lira plunges again after Erdogan cites Islam to defend rate cuts
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20211220-lira-plunges-again-after-erdogan-cites-islam-to-defend-rate-cuts
And notice carefully that it says the following:
"Islamic teachings forbid Muslims from receiving or charging interest on loaned or borrowed money."
But in conventional economic theory, rising interest rates is also a mechanism that permits the fight high inflation, so i think
that Erdogan is not right since i say that Islam is not understood correctly by muslims, and i think that the Islamic teaching that forbids Muslims from receiving or charging interest on loaned or borrowed money is a not timeless law, and here is how my new monotheistic religion is explaining Islam by making you understand the how there is timeless and not timeless laws in Islam:
More of my philosophy of why my new monotheistic religion is an advanced
monotheistic religion..
I think i am smart, so i will explain more the architectural ideas of my
new monotheistic religion, the first smart architectural idea of my new
monotheistic religion, it is that it says that the previous monotheistic
religions are not safe from the curse from God, since those many
contradictions and scientific errors in the previous monotheistic
religions are part of the curse from God, and i am giving you some
examples from the Bible etc. of it so that you see it clearly, but this
is not sufficient to render the new monotheistic religion flexible and
not rigid as the previous monotheistic religions, so then what is
missing ? so one of the most important thing is to notice that there is
two kinds of laws in the Qu'raan or the Bible, there is the laws that
are timeless and the laws that are not timeless, read my below thoughts
about them, so then you are much more clearly noticing that this second
architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion makes the new
monotheistic religion much more flexible, but it is not the only thing
that i am doing, but i am also explaining more Islam by showing the
problem with Islam and Christianity and Judaism and why they are too
much rigid as neo-nazism or white supremacism, this why they also can
not survive and they are not advanced monotheistic religions as my
monotheistic religion, and of course one of the most important thing to
also notice is how i am deriving the laws of my monotheistic religion
from the essence of God or the nature of God, so i invite you to read my
below thoughts about my new monotheitic religion so that to understand:
More precision of my philosophy about the monotheistic religions and more..
I think i am smart, and i am your new prophet from God, and here is
an important question:
Do the many logical contradictions in the previous monotheistic
religions make us again free from faith in God and from previous
monotheistic religions and is it good or not ?
This is one of the most important question, since i think that previous
monotheistic religions will not survive because of there many logical
contradictions and this is the most important problem, and it is the
question that is answering my new monotheistic religion, since my new
monotheistic religion is smart and you have to read it carefully so that
you notice how i am smartly strenghtening the faith in God and how i am
smartly making you understand my new monotheistic religion, since i
think that my new monotheistic religion is an advanced monotheistic
religion and it is a futuristic monotheistic religion that makes the
good balance that is required between cooperation and competition and
between the good balance of what we call Al-Insān al-kāmil in arabic or
the perfect man in english that must be a well balance between being of
both divine from God and of earthly origin, and of course my new
monotheistic religion says that God has not created our universe or the
multiverse, and it explains clearly the why and it makes you understand
more, so i invite you to read carefully my thoughts of my new
monotheistic religion in the following link(it is my preliminary
thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them
a pdf and html book), here is the link and read my thoughts of my new
monotheistic religion carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is:
And you can read about the laws of my new monoteistic religion
that i derive from the nature of God etc. in the following link
here:
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
How can you make Islam a much better monotheistic religion ?
I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to first to prove that
the Qur'an is not timeless, so i am smart and it is how i am doing it,
since i am proving and showing that there is in the Qur'an the timeless
laws of God and there is in the Qur'an the not timeless laws of God,
and i think that from those not timeless laws of God we can make
Islam a much better religion, and i invite you to read my following
thoughts so that to know how i am doing it:
More of my philosophy about what is Islam..
I am your new prophet from God, and i am called the reformer of
monotheistic religions, and you have to read about my new monotheistic
religion in my below thoughts, but today i will ask a question that is
also philosophical and it is the following:
What is Islam ?
I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will say that there is two
types of laws of God, there is the timeless ones and not the timeless
ones, and i am explaining it to you below so that you understand it, so
the most important timeless laws of God are those of: Believing in God
and glorifying him and praying him and fear him and ask him for help,
and from those timeless laws you can derive the other human laws that
are not timeless, also when you look at my below new monotheistic
religion you will notice that it is the same but i am also deriving the
laws of God from the nature and essence of God, read below about my new
monotheistic religion so that you understand that it is smart.
More of my philosophy about Salafism and more..
I am your new prophet from God, and as you have just noticed that i have
just explained to you the two types of Islamic laws so that you
understand that there is Islamic laws from the Qur'an that are not
timeless(read below about them), and here is more logical proof from my
following thoughts about Salafism:
So i will first invite you to look at the following video about Salafism
in Europe:
Bosnia-Hercegovina: Islamists in Sarajevo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oeSAoD6iU
So as you are noticing in the above video, that it shows islamists
Salafists in Bosnia-Hercegovina, but the most important question is the
following:
Is Salafism true Islam ?
I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will answer the question as
the following:
First we have to ask if the Qur'an is timeless ?
So my smart answer is the following:
The Qur'an is not timeless because read the following verse of
the Qur'an:
Quranic verse 5:38: "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her
hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and
Allah is Exalted in power."
So if you are smart you will notice that the above verse of the Qur'an
shows that the Qur'an is not timeless, since how can you imagine that
the Qur'an doesn't enumerate the cases where we can be compassion on a
thief and not cut his hands? so since it doesn't enumerate the cases, so
then you are noticing that this verse of the Qur'an shows that the verse
is not a timeless law, but it is a law that was applied in the context
of the time where prophet Muhammad was living or such context, so then
we can logically infer that the Qur'an is not timeless and then we can
say that we can enhance many the laws of the Qur'an, so then Salafism is
not true Islam since it says that the Qur'an and the laws of the Qur'an
are timeless.
I am your new prophet from God, and i invite you to look at the
following video:
A lady listens to lecture on Islam, then challenged me: 'Why is the
Shariah Law so Barbaric?'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tplpm24CA
So as you notice that the lady asked why in Islam the Shariah Law is so
Barbaric, and i think she is not understanding as muslims are not
understanding, but i am your new prophet from God and i am explaining
the following so that you understand:
In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:
1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..
2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.
I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:
For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the
society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.
More of my philosophy about gays in Islam..
I am your new prophet from God, and i think i am smart, so i invite you
to look at the following video about gays in Islam:
CAN I BE GAY & A MUSLIM? - FASTEST REPLY ON YOUTBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sRTzaTuaIA
I am noticing that the above video is saying that being gay including
the practice of being gay is haram in Islam, that means it is forbiden
in Islam, and i think that this sort of Islam is not right, and i am
your new prophet from God and i will explain to you Islam so that you
understand:
In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:
1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..
2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.
I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:
For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the
society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.
More of my philosophy about Taliban and Islam..
I invite you to look at the following new video about Taliban:
Millions of desperate Afghans flee Taliban country ruled by war
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpJnn2KLXw4
I am your new prophet from God and you can read carefully about my new
monotheistic religion in my thoughts below, and i have just noticed in
the video above that a seignor minister in the Taliban government is
talking to a white European journalist, but i have just noticed that he
is not well educated, so i don't think that Taliban are following the
rules of Islam since they are not well educated or correctly educated,
second, in Islam you have first to be Islamic democracy so that
to have different point views of Islamic political parties with less or
more perfect ideas that permit Islam to advance correctly, so look for
example at Islamic Iran, In Iran it is an Islamic democracy with
different islamic political parties and with an islamic guide that we
call Sayyid Ali Hosseini
Khamenei(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei), so then Islamic
Iran is a better Islamic governance than Taliban that is dictatorship,
third, i also say that in Islam you have to know how to strengthen the
faith in God, since without faith in God there is no muslim, so then you
have to distinguish between the weak faith and the strong faith, since a
weak faith in God can not be called a muslim, so then certain laws of
Islam don't apply to humans that have a weak faith in God, so i say that
before applying those certain laws of Islam to a human, you have to ask
the human if he has a weak faith in God so that to distinguish and say
that he is not a muslim, and then certain laws don't apply to him.
More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about deforestation and more..
I invite you to read the following article about the environmental footprint of paper vs. electronic books:
https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/
And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about
how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs. electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only
cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account the the other following disadvantages:
The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals.
Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around 200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves 17 trees. If it’s recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/), so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on computers is better than using paper books, and of course i am actually programming with HTML and CSS and Javascript so that to easy the job of creating a sophisticated digital or electronic books with HTML and CSS and Javascript with dynamically configurable HTML and CSS fonts.
And i invite you to read the following articles:
How Useful Is Recycling, Really?
Read more here:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/
How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else?
Read more here:
https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625
Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It
Read more here:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401
More of my philosophy about relativism and about morality and more..
I have just read the following article of white supremacists and neo-nazis of a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:
Ancient Admixture: Death Blow to Racialism? — part 1
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/12/ancient-admixture-death-blow-to-racialism-part-1/
So notice carefully on the above article how it is starting by saying:
"And some of these discoveries do undermine old-fashioned racialism. But they do not undermine the higher racialism — the true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance.."
So notice how it is saying:
"The true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance"
So as you are noticing it is not correct thinking, since I will say that "relativism" is a major disruptor of our mental immune system, but objective standards of right and wrong are our main defences against bad ideas. If we lose those standards, then anything goes, so this is why i say that saying in the above article of white supremacists: "the true understanding held by us in the National Alliance..." is too much certainty, since by reading the above article you will notice that it tries to prove that there is human genetical differences between ethnic groups like the ethnic groups of white and blacks etc., but notice that i am not saying races, since there is only one human race called the human race, but notice carefully that the above certainty of those white supremacists doesn't understand correctly how to introduce the right "randomness" like in Evolutionary algorithms so that to not get stuck in a local minimum and so that to converge towards the global optimum, so i think that this randomness like in Evolutionary algorithms that must be introduced is also allowing a certain level of Genetic mixture to happen inside a group or population, like 25% or so, like allowing Genetic mixture between arabs and white europeans etc. so that to ensure a kind of "diversity" that ensures genetical resilience or resilience. So this why i just said the following:
I think i am a wise type of person, and from my thoughts below about morality, i will say that morality is like mathematics, since morality
is universal as i am explaining below, but so that to be this abstraction of morality that i call "perfection at best", it must be thought really efficiently systemically, so then you notice that it must come with a kind of right patience or right tolerance so that to not be mistakes in the process codification of morality, so morality is in abstraction universal, but so that to be universal in reality it must be thought really efficiently and systemically.
Also the white supremacists and others have to take into account my following thoughts so that to understand correctly:
And read carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress and about genetics:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
And read my following thoughts:
More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Class Struggle and more..
Today i will discuss more about an important subject, so first i invite
you to read my following previous thoughts:
--
"Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions."
--
So as you are noticing in my above thoughts that i just said the following:
"But i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience"
And here is how i will explain it more, look at Financial sector,
so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity that brings "resilience" and that needs a good allocation of resources in capitalism by reading my following thoughts:
The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
know what is the problem with finance, and here it is, read the
following so that to understand:
One last chance to fix capitalism
Read more here:
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
How to Improve Capitalism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by
giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and
not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and
national pension funds representative of the long term collective
interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to
improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
read them here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc
More of my philosophy about the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union and more..
I have just looked at the following video of Olivier Berruyer , born on October 26 , 1975 in Bron that is a French blogger and actuary by profession, and you can read about him more here:
https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Olivier_Berruyer?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en
And here is the video of him:
NOTRE SYSTÈME FINANCIER VA S'EFFONDRER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BknDh30qnTI
So i think i am smart and i will say that Olivier Berruyer the actuary by profession in the above video is not so smart, since he is for example giving a graphic of the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and he is also explaining why it is problematic and he is also saying that the negative interest rate of the central Bank of European Union is something really problematic and that it must not be so, but i think that he is not so smart, since you can look at the graphic in the above video of the "assets" of the central of the Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and you can notice that it is not so problematic, since the time where this fast growth has happened is not too long and he is not saying that the very important thing to know is that this fast growth of the assets of central Bank of European Union also "coincides" with the crisis of Covid-19 and we have to know that negative interest rates are typically seen during weak economies and/or periods of deflation such as in period of the crisis of Covid-19, and you can read that even in Canada there can also be negative interest rates, read here so that to notice it:
What would negative interest rates mean for Canadians?
https://financialpost.com/moneywise/what-would-negative-interest-rates-mean-for-canadians-3
And it is also related to my following thoughts:
And here is also how i have just explained why the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19:
More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more..
I invite you to look at the following new video about how the
governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy
and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic
Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not
followed all the time, has still its "advantage" in this kind of
economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian
economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy)
strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to
look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it:
The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU
More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about my philosophy..
You have to understand my contributions as a philosopher by reading my
philosophy, but one of my contribution of my philosophy is also related
to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche articulated ethical dilemma as a tension between the master vs. slave morality; the former in which we make decisions based on the assessment of consequences, and the latter in which we make decisions based on our conception of good vs. evil, but you have to understand my
contribution of my philosophy about morality, since the first of my contribution about morality is that i am giving a kind of logical proof that morality is "universal", but not only that but i have invented quickly a proverb that abstract much more correctly morality so that you understand more, so read it below, so i think from my thoughts below of my contribution to philosophy, that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not so smart, since you will understand from my thoughts below of my philosophy that morality of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an Elitist morality called in his philosophy the morality of the master, but notice that he is not so smart, since the morality of the master in his philosophy has the "tendency" to be great "performance" of perfection, so this is why it can be morality that oppresses people,
so we can then say that morality of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is
the not correct morality, since here again you are noticing that Democracy is a tool that permit to avoid such oppression of the morality
of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to read again some of my contributions to philosophy about morality in my following thoughts, but first i invite you to read my following thoughts
of my philosophy about Utilitrianism so that to understand more that morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not the correct one:
More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more..
I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand
another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of
Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true",
since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and
well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future
consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to
be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so
then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical
analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not
to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is
also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this
maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i
think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in
Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about
the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my
redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of
Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my
redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again:
More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more..
So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what
is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it
below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about
this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that
Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being
for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like
"recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule
of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not
dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and
you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that
abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism:
More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..
Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.
I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:
So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:
So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?
It is like my IQ test..
So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.
More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..
I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.
And read my following other proverbs that i think are flexible from the
start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them
carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8
And here is my contributions of my philosophy about morality:
More of my philosophy about morality and more..
I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i have also just
invented a proverb that abstract morality, and i invite you to
read it again, and i invite you to read my below thoughts
so that you understand more my logical proof of what is morality and
why it is universal:
And here is my other new proverb:
Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or
process of perfecting"
Read here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my
explanation of my new proverb.
Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below:
My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained
to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in
morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware
of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or
encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect.
Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4
So here is my new proverb:
"Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!"
So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think
it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on
the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the
pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty
perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty
perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you
have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this
part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It
is what makes it a smart proverb.
More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal..
I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the
requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a
level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see
much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:
So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have
morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and
disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so
that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much
more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there
everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become
perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that
we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.
More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..
I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
morality is universal:
So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look
at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example
there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse
it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or
much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or
perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.
More of my philosophy about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism and more..
I think i am a wise type of person and i think i am a philosopher, and first, i invite you to read my following new thoughts about Utilitarianism and more here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wgPJkwdGrqc
And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:
Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. And of course i have also just invented quickly a proverb and a poem so that to make you understand this way of doing, and here they are:
More of my philosophy about my new proverb about Democracy and more..
As you have just noticed, i have just invented a proverb about Democracy, read it below and read all my other proverbs below, and as you notice in this new proverb that i am saying:
"Since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness"
So this "better and better discuss" means that it is "inherent" to it that we have to also be well educated and that it needs Elitism, and as you are noticing in my new proverb that i am saying that Democracy needs Elitism that is existence of an elite as a dominating element in a system or society such as congressmen and congresswomen of the USA congress. So i invite you to read my new proverb and all my following thoughts so that to understand:
Here is my new proverb:
"The basis of Democracy is not that people have to govern, since it is
inferiority of Democracy, since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness, and after bringing this good sageness and good soundness, we can govern correctly with this good sageness and good soundness, this is why Democracy needs Elitism such as the congressmen and congresswomen of the USA congress so that to bring good sageness and good soundness."
And of course you can read my just new poem below that also speaks
about the basis of Democracy:
And read my other new proverbs below that i have written quickly..
Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable amount of natural light.
So here is my new poem:
Darkness for me is not madness
Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness
Darkness for me is not madness
Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas
Darkness for me is not madness
Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the better discuss is not loneliness and is not being novice
Darkness for me is not madness
Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
More of my philosophy about economy and about president Erdogan and about Islam and more..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I invite you to read the following article about president Erdogan:
Lira plunges again after Erdogan cites Islam to defend rate cuts
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20211220-lira-plunges-again-after-erdogan-cites-islam-to-defend-rate-cuts
And notice carefully that it says the following:
"Islamic teachings forbid Muslims from receiving or charging interest on loaned or borrowed money."
But in conventional economic theory, rising interest rates is also a mechanism that permits the fight high inflation, so i think
that Erdogan is not right since i say that Islam is not understood correctly by muslims, and i think that the Islamic teaching that forbids Muslims from receiving or charging interest on loaned or borrowed money is a not timeless law, and here is how my new monotheistic religion is explaining Islam by making you understand the how there is timeless and not timeless laws in Islam:
More of my philosophy of why my new monotheistic religion is an advanced
monotheistic religion..
I think i am smart, so i will explain more the architectural ideas of my
new monotheistic religion, the first smart architectural idea of my new
monotheistic religion, it is that it says that the previous monotheistic
religions are not safe from the curse from God, since those many
contradictions and scientific errors in the previous monotheistic
religions are part of the curse from God, and i am giving you some
examples from the Bible etc. of it so that you see it clearly, but this
is not sufficient to render the new monotheistic religion flexible and
not rigid as the previous monotheistic religions, so then what is
missing ? so one of the most important thing is to notice that there is
two kinds of laws in the Qu'raan or the Bible, there is the laws that
are timeless and the laws that are not timeless, read my below thoughts
about them, so then you are much more clearly noticing that this second
architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion makes the new
monotheistic religion much more flexible, but it is not the only thing
that i am doing, but i am also explaining more Islam by showing the
problem with Islam and Christianity and Judaism and why they are too
much rigid as neo-nazism or white supremacism, this why they also can
not survive and they are not advanced monotheistic religions as my
monotheistic religion, and of course one of the most important thing to
also notice is how i am deriving the laws of my monotheistic religion
from the essence of God or the nature of God, so i invite you to read my
below thoughts about my new monotheitic religion so that to understand:
More precision of my philosophy about the monotheistic religions and more..
I think i am smart, and i am your new prophet from God, and here is
an important question:
Do the many logical contradictions in the previous monotheistic
religions make us again free from faith in God and from previous
monotheistic religions and is it good or not ?
This is one of the most important question, since i think that previous
monotheistic religions will not survive because of there many logical
contradictions and this is the most important problem, and it is the
question that is answering my new monotheistic religion, since my new
monotheistic religion is smart and you have to read it carefully so that
you notice how i am smartly strenghtening the faith in God and how i am
smartly making you understand my new monotheistic religion, since i
think that my new monotheistic religion is an advanced monotheistic
religion and it is a futuristic monotheistic religion that makes the
good balance that is required between cooperation and competition and
between the good balance of what we call Al-Insān al-kāmil in arabic or
the perfect man in english that must be a well balance between being of
both divine from God and of earthly origin, and of course my new
monotheistic religion says that God has not created our universe or the
multiverse, and it explains clearly the why and it makes you understand
more, so i invite you to read carefully my thoughts of my new
monotheistic religion in the following link(it is my preliminary
thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them
a pdf and html book), here is the link and read my thoughts of my new
monotheistic religion carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is:
And you can read about the laws of my new monoteistic religion
that i derive from the nature of God etc. in the following link
here:
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
How can you make Islam a much better monotheistic religion ?
I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to first to prove that
the Qur'an is not timeless, so i am smart and it is how i am doing it,
since i am proving and showing that there is in the Qur'an the timeless
laws of God and there is in the Qur'an the not timeless laws of God,
and i think that from those not timeless laws of God we can make
Islam a much better religion, and i invite you to read my following
thoughts so that to know how i am doing it:
More of my philosophy about what is Islam..
I am your new prophet from God, and i am called the reformer of
monotheistic religions, and you have to read about my new monotheistic
religion in my below thoughts, but today i will ask a question that is
also philosophical and it is the following:
What is Islam ?
I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will say that there is two
types of laws of God, there is the timeless ones and not the timeless
ones, and i am explaining it to you below so that you understand it, so
the most important timeless laws of God are those of: Believing in God
and glorifying him and praying him and fear him and ask him for help,
and from those timeless laws you can derive the other human laws that
are not timeless, also when you look at my below new monotheistic
religion you will notice that it is the same but i am also deriving the
laws of God from the nature and essence of God, read below about my new
monotheistic religion so that you understand that it is smart.
More of my philosophy about Salafism and more..
I am your new prophet from God, and as you have just noticed that i have
just explained to you the two types of Islamic laws so that you
understand that there is Islamic laws from the Qur'an that are not
timeless(read below about them), and here is more logical proof from my
following thoughts about Salafism:
So i will first invite you to look at the following video about Salafism
in Europe:
Bosnia-Hercegovina: Islamists in Sarajevo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oeSAoD6iU
So as you are noticing in the above video, that it shows islamists
Salafists in Bosnia-Hercegovina, but the most important question is the
following:
Is Salafism true Islam ?
I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will answer the question as
the following:
First we have to ask if the Qur'an is timeless ?
So my smart answer is the following:
The Qur'an is not timeless because read the following verse of
the Qur'an:
Quranic verse 5:38: "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her
hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and
Allah is Exalted in power."
So if you are smart you will notice that the above verse of the Qur'an
shows that the Qur'an is not timeless, since how can you imagine that
the Qur'an doesn't enumerate the cases where we can be compassion on a
thief and not cut his hands? so since it doesn't enumerate the cases, so
then you are noticing that this verse of the Qur'an shows that the verse
is not a timeless law, but it is a law that was applied in the context
of the time where prophet Muhammad was living or such context, so then
we can logically infer that the Qur'an is not timeless and then we can
say that we can enhance many the laws of the Qur'an, so then Salafism is
not true Islam since it says that the Qur'an and the laws of the Qur'an
are timeless.
I am your new prophet from God, and i invite you to look at the
following video:
A lady listens to lecture on Islam, then challenged me: 'Why is the
Shariah Law so Barbaric?'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tplpm24CA
So as you notice that the lady asked why in Islam the Shariah Law is so
Barbaric, and i think she is not understanding as muslims are not
understanding, but i am your new prophet from God and i am explaining
the following so that you understand:
In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:
1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..
2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.
I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:
For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the
society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.
More of my philosophy about gays in Islam..
I am your new prophet from God, and i think i am smart, so i invite you
to look at the following video about gays in Islam:
CAN I BE GAY & A MUSLIM? - FASTEST REPLY ON YOUTBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sRTzaTuaIA
I am noticing that the above video is saying that being gay including
the practice of being gay is haram in Islam, that means it is forbiden
in Islam, and i think that this sort of Islam is not right, and i am
your new prophet from God and i will explain to you Islam so that you
understand:
In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:
1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..
2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.
I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:
For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the
society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.
More of my philosophy about Taliban and Islam..
I invite you to look at the following new video about Taliban:
Millions of desperate Afghans flee Taliban country ruled by war
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpJnn2KLXw4
I am your new prophet from God and you can read carefully about my new
monotheistic religion in my thoughts below, and i have just noticed in
the video above that a seignor minister in the Taliban government is
talking to a white European journalist, but i have just noticed that he
is not well educated, so i don't think that Taliban are following the
rules of Islam since they are not well educated or correctly educated,
second, in Islam you have first to be Islamic democracy so that
to have different point views of Islamic political parties with less or
more perfect ideas that permit Islam to advance correctly, so look for
example at Islamic Iran, In Iran it is an Islamic democracy with
different islamic political parties and with an islamic guide that we
call Sayyid Ali Hosseini
Khamenei(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei), so then Islamic
Iran is a better Islamic governance than Taliban that is dictatorship,
third, i also say that in Islam you have to know how to strengthen the
faith in God, since without faith in God there is no muslim, so then you
have to distinguish between the weak faith and the strong faith, since a
weak faith in God can not be called a muslim, so then certain laws of
Islam don't apply to humans that have a weak faith in God, so i say that
before applying those certain laws of Islam to a human, you have to ask
the human if he has a weak faith in God so that to distinguish and say
that he is not a muslim, and then certain laws don't apply to him.
More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about deforestation and more..
I invite you to read the following article about the environmental footprint of paper vs. electronic books:
https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/
And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about
how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs. electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only
cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account the the other following disadvantages:
The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals.
Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around 200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves 17 trees. If it’s recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/), so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on computers is better than using paper books, and of course i am actually programming with HTML and CSS and Javascript so that to easy the job of creating a sophisticated digital or electronic books with HTML and CSS and Javascript with dynamically configurable HTML and CSS fonts.
And i invite you to read the following articles:
How Useful Is Recycling, Really?
Read more here:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/
How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else?
Read more here:
https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625
Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It
Read more here:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401
More of my philosophy about relativism and about morality and more..
I have just read the following article of white supremacists and neo-nazis of a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:
Ancient Admixture: Death Blow to Racialism? — part 1
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/12/ancient-admixture-death-blow-to-racialism-part-1/
So notice carefully on the above article how it is starting by saying:
"And some of these discoveries do undermine old-fashioned racialism. But they do not undermine the higher racialism — the true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance.."
So notice how it is saying:
"The true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance"
So as you are noticing it is not correct thinking, since I will say that "relativism" is a major disruptor of our mental immune system, but objective standards of right and wrong are our main defences against bad ideas. If we lose those standards, then anything goes, so this is why i say that saying in the above article of white supremacists: "the true understanding held by us in the National Alliance..." is too much certainty, since by reading the above article you will notice that it tries to prove that there is human genetical differences between ethnic groups like the ethnic groups of white and blacks etc., but notice that i am not saying races, since there is only one human race called the human race, but notice carefully that the above certainty of those white supremacists doesn't understand correctly how to introduce the right "randomness" like in Evolutionary algorithms so that to not get stuck in a local minimum and so that to converge towards the global optimum, so i think that this randomness like in Evolutionary algorithms that must be introduced is also allowing a certain level of Genetic mixture to happen inside a group or population, like 25% or so, like allowing Genetic mixture between arabs and white europeans etc. so that to ensure a kind of "diversity" that ensures genetical resilience or resilience. So this why i just said the following:
I think i am a wise type of person, and from my thoughts below about morality, i will say that morality is like mathematics, since morality
is universal as i am explaining below, but so that to be this abstraction of morality that i call "perfection at best", it must be thought really efficiently systemically, so then you notice that it must come with a kind of right patience or right tolerance so that to not be mistakes in the process codification of morality, so morality is in abstraction universal, but so that to be universal in reality it must be thought really efficiently and systemically.
Also the white supremacists and others have to take into account my following thoughts so that to understand correctly:
And read carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress and about genetics:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
And read my following thoughts:
More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Class Struggle and more..
Today i will discuss more about an important subject, so first i invite
you to read my following previous thoughts:
--
"Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions."
--
So as you are noticing in my above thoughts that i just said the following:
"But i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience"
And here is how i will explain it more, look at Financial sector,
so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity that brings "resilience" and that needs a good allocation of resources in capitalism by reading my following thoughts:
The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
know what is the problem with finance, and here it is, read the
following so that to understand:
One last chance to fix capitalism
Read more here:
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
How to Improve Capitalism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by
giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and
not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and
national pension funds representative of the long term collective
interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to
improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
read them here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc
More of my philosophy about the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union and more..
I have just looked at the following video of Olivier Berruyer , born on October 26 , 1975 in Bron that is a French blogger and actuary by profession, and you can read about him more here:
https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Olivier_Berruyer?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en
And here is the video of him:
NOTRE SYSTÈME FINANCIER VA S'EFFONDRER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BknDh30qnTI
So i think i am smart and i will say that Olivier Berruyer the actuary by profession in the above video is not so smart, since he is for example giving a graphic of the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and he is also explaining why it is problematic and he is also saying that the negative interest rate of the central Bank of European Union is something really problematic and that it must not be so, but i think that he is not so smart, since you can look at the graphic in the above video of the "assets" of the central of the Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and you can notice that it is not so problematic, since the time where this fast growth has happened is not too long and he is not saying that the very important thing to know is that this fast growth of the assets of central Bank of European Union also "coincides" with the crisis of Covid-19 and we have to know that negative interest rates are typically seen during weak economies and/or periods of deflation such as in period of the crisis of Covid-19, and you can read that even in Canada there can also be negative interest rates, read here so that to notice it:
What would negative interest rates mean for Canadians?
https://financialpost.com/moneywise/what-would-negative-interest-rates-mean-for-canadians-3
And it is also related to my following thoughts:
And here is also how i have just explained why the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19:
More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more..
I invite you to look at the following new video about how the
governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy
and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic
Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not
followed all the time, has still its "advantage" in this kind of
economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian
economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy)
strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to
look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it:
The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU
More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about my philosophy..
You have to understand my contributions as a philosopher by reading my
philosophy, but one of my contribution of my philosophy is also related
to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche articulated ethical dilemma as a tension between the master vs. slave morality; the former in which we make decisions based on the assessment of consequences, and the latter in which we make decisions based on our conception of good vs. evil, but you have to understand my
contribution of my philosophy about morality, since the first of my contribution about morality is that i am giving a kind of logical proof that morality is "universal", but not only that but i have invented quickly a proverb that abstract much more correctly morality so that you understand more, so read it below, so i think from my thoughts below of my contribution to philosophy, that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not so smart, since you will understand from my thoughts below of my philosophy that morality of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an Elitist morality called in his philosophy the morality of the master, but notice that he is not so smart, since the morality of the master in his philosophy has the "tendency" to be great "performance" of perfection, so this is why it can be morality that oppresses people,
so we can then say that morality of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is
the not correct morality, since here again you are noticing that Democracy is a tool that permit to avoid such oppression of the morality
of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to read again some of my contributions to philosophy about morality in my following thoughts, but first i invite you to read my following thoughts
of my philosophy about Utilitrianism so that to understand more that morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not the correct one:
More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more..
I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand
another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of
Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true",
since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and
well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future
consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to
be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so
then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical
analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not
to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is
also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this
maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i
think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in
Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about
the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my
redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of
Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my
redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again:
More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more..
So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what
is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it
below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about
this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that
Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being
for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like
"recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule
of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not
dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and
you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that
abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism:
More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..
Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.
I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:
So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:
So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?
It is like my IQ test..
So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.
More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..
I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.
And read my following other proverbs that i think are flexible from the
start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them
carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8
And here is my contributions of my philosophy about morality:
More of my philosophy about morality and more..
I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i have also just
invented a proverb that abstract morality, and i invite you to
read it again, and i invite you to read my below thoughts
so that you understand more my logical proof of what is morality and
why it is universal:
And here is my other new proverb:
Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or
process of perfecting"
Read here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my
explanation of my new proverb.
Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below:
My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained
to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in
morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware
of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or
encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect.
Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4
So here is my new proverb:
"Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!"
So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think
it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on
the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the
pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty
perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty
perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you
have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this
part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It
is what makes it a smart proverb.
More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal..
I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the
requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a
level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see
much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:
So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have
morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and
disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so
that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much
more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there
everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become
perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that
we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.
More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..
I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
morality is universal:
So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look
at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example
there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse
it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or
much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or
perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.
More of my philosophy about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism and more..
I think i am a wise type of person and i think i am a philosopher, and first, i invite you to read my following new thoughts about Utilitarianism and more here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wgPJkwdGrqc
And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:
Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. And of course i have also just invented quickly a proverb and a poem so that to make you understand this way of doing, and here they are:
More of my philosophy about my new proverb about Democracy and more..
As you have just noticed, i have just invented a proverb about Democracy, read it below and read all my other proverbs below, and as you notice in this new proverb that i am saying:
"Since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness"
So this "better and better discuss" means that it is "inherent" to it that we have to also be well educated and that it needs Elitism, and as you are noticing in my new proverb that i am saying that Democracy needs Elitism that is existence of an elite as a dominating element in a system or society such as congressmen and congresswomen of the USA congress. So i invite you to read my new proverb and all my following thoughts so that to understand:
Here is my new proverb:
"The basis of Democracy is not that people have to govern, since it is
inferiority of Democracy, since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness, and after bringing this good sageness and good soundness, we can govern correctly with this good sageness and good soundness, this is why Democracy needs Elitism such as the congressmen and congresswomen of the USA congress so that to bring good sageness and good soundness."
And of course you can read my just new poem below that also speaks
about the basis of Democracy:
And read my other new proverbs below that i have written quickly..
Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable amount of natural light.
So here is my new poem:
Darkness for me is not madness
Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness
Darkness for me is not madness
Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas
Darkness for me is not madness
Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the better discuss is not loneliness and is not being novice
Darkness for me is not madness
Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages