More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,


More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not Freedom of speech, so then i think that the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a realistic and objective way of doing.

More of my philosophy about capitalism and about the rich and more..

I invite you to look at the following french video that is
talking about capitalism and the rich:

Deviens riche ! | Streetphilosophy | ARTE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4I5bFIK6Go

I think i am smart, and i have just looked at the above video,
and i think that the women in the above video is not talking correctly,
since she is saying that when a person possess billions of dollars, in a world where many people struggle because they do not have much money, it is an immoral person, and she is talking like the following article,
so i invite you to read it:

It’s basically just immoral to be rich

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/06/its-basically-just-immoral-to-be-rich

So now i will answer this philosophical question, so i think the
defects of the above article is that he is wanting to manage money
and wealth of the rich by much more equalizing in a society, but i think that it is not the correct way, since you can understand capitalism by looking at for example the Financial sector, so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity that brings "resilience" and that needs a good allocation of resources in capitalism by reading my following thoughts:

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
know what is the problem with finance, and here it is

So then you are understanding from the above that capitalism needs
a good allocation of resources, since efficiency also says that giving
much more money or making rich the talented people such as in capitalism is also an efficient allocation of resources, since the talented people know how to efficiently distribute again and invest again efficiently there big money and richness in other projects and good ideas, so capitalism brings this kind of efficiency, so then this means that it is not correct to say that when a person possess billions of dollars, in a world where many people struggle because they do not have much money, it is an immoral person, since saying so is also extremism and archaism of Class Struggle, and talking about Class Struggle here is my thoughts about Class Struggle:


And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. And of course i have also just invented quickly a proverb and a poem so that to make you understand this way of doing, and here they are:

More of my philosophy about my new proverb about Democracy and more..

As you have just noticed, i have just invented a proverb about Democracy, read it below and read all my other proverbs below, and as you notice in this new proverb that i am saying:

"Since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness"

So this "better and better discuss" means that it is "inherent" to it that we have to also be well educated and that it needs Elitism, and as you are noticing in my new proverb that i am saying that Democracy needs Elitism that is existence of an elite as a dominating element in a system or society such as congressmen and congresswomen of the USA congress. So i invite you to read my new proverb and all my following thoughts so that to understand:

Here is my new proverb:

"The basis of Democracy is not that people have to govern, since it is
inferiority of Democracy, since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness, and after bringing this good sageness and good soundness, we can govern correctly with this good sageness and good soundness, this is why Democracy needs Elitism such as the congressmen and congresswomen of the USA congress so that to bring good sageness and good soundness."

And of course you can read my just new poem below that also speaks
about the basis of Democracy:

And read my other new proverbs below that i have written quickly..

Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable amount of natural light.


So here is my new poem:

---
Darkness for me is not madness

Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss is not loneliness and is not being novice

Darkness for me is not madness

Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness
---



More of my philosophy about faith and God and why to believe in God..

So i will invite you to look at the following video that i have
just looked at about the Why Believe in God?

Why Believe in God? | Episode 1103 | Closer To Truth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFJ_Yeb_2RY


So i will ask a philosophical question of:

Why to believe in God ?

I think i am smart and i explain how my new monotheistic religion
answer this question:

So take for example my first architectural idea of my new monotheistic
religion below, it says the following:

1- First architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that so
that to be able to render the new monotheistic religion efficient,
you have to say that God is "greatly" arrogant, since it explains the
reality of the for example God is not even helping the weak
and poor animals or poor and weak humans.

So i will say the following:

If God is greatly arrogant that means that there is this possibility
or probability that God exists, so then we have to know how to live our life by balancing correctly by knowing about this possibility or probability that God exists ! and of course this kind of balance makes us more civilized, so you are clearly noticing that my new monotheistic religion is like a Mensa IQ test, since you have to read it carefully so that to notice it, and of course i will enhance it and explain it more and write an efficient digital or electronic book about it. And now the rest of the answer of the philosophical question above is to know how to be this well "balance" and it is by reading how i am extracting the laws of my new monotheistic religion from the nature of God that is the following:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".


So the above characteristics of God makes the constraints that allows us
to derive the laws of God, so this is how i am doing it, so read
my following thoughts so that to understand how i am doing it:

More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and more..

Read carefully my following thoughts so that to understand more:

I think my new monotheistic religion is efficient, and i am your new prophet from God and i think i am smart, and i have quickly constructed my new monotheistic religion and here is more clearly the "architectural" ideas of my new monotheistic religion:

1- First architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that so
that to be able to render the new monotheistic religion efficient,
you have to say that God is "greatly" arrogant, since it explains the
reality of the for example God is not even helping the weak
and poor animals or poor and weak humans, and here is the definition
of being "arrogant":

More philosophy about the nature of God..

I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is:

"Who is an arrogant person?

Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has
an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the
one who acts as if they’re superior, more worthy, and more important
than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down.
At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They
want to be appreciated for the great things they’ve done and for their
special qualities and abilities."

And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is
his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor
animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this
is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the
most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and
fear him and ask him for help.

2- My second architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion
is that it says that the previous monotheistic religions are not safe
from the curse from God, since those many contradictions and
scientific errors in the previous monotheistic religions are part of
the curse from God, and i am giving you some examples from the Bible
etc. of it so that you see it clearly, but this is not sufficient to
render the new monotheistic religion flexible and not rigid as the
previous monotheistic religions, so then what is missing ? read my
third architectural idea in the my following thoughts so that to
understand:

3- Third architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that one
of the most important thing is to notice that there is two kinds of
laws in the Qu'raan or the Bible, there is the laws that are timeless
and the laws that are not timeless, read my below thoughts about
them, so then you are much more clearly noticing that this second
architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion makes the new
monotheistic religion much more flexible, but it is not the
only thing that i am doing, but i am also explaining more Islam by
showing the problem with Islam and Christianity and Judaism and why
they are too much rigid as neo-nazism or white supremacism, this why
they also can not survive and they are not advanced monotheistic
religions as my monotheistic religion, and of course one of the most
important thingto also notice is how i am deriving the laws of my
monotheistic religion from the essence of God or the nature of God,
and here is the laws of my new monotheistic religion and here is how
i am deriving the laws of my monotheistic religion from the essence
of God or the nature of God:

More philosophy about Sufism and more..

I am your new prophet from God and i will explain more what is the
defects of Sufism:

So notice what said Ibn Khaldun about Sufism:

"Sufism is dedication to worship, total dedication to Allah most High,
disregard for the finery and ornament of the world, abstinence from the
pleasure, wealth, and prestige sought by most men, and retiring from
others to worship alone." Ibn Khaldun, quoted in Keller, Nuh Ha Mim, The
Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islam.

So as you are noticing that there is two big defects in Sufism, and
first big defect of Sufism is that it is "extremism" of worshiping God
by glorifying God and such, so it gives too too much time to
worshiping of God, and it neglects living correctly the human life, so
this is not in accordance with my new monotheistic religion since in my
new monotheistic religion i am extracting the law from the essence of
God or the nature of God by saying that you have to be "presentable" in
front of God when you worship God by glorifying him and say to him that
for example he is the most beautiful, so if you neglect yourself by
being too much of this worshiping of God by glorifying God and say to
him that for example he is the most beautiful, you will neglect yourself
in this world and you will not be presentable in front of God, and it is
in logical contradiction with one of the laws of my new monotheistic
religion, and this is not good, so here is the law of my monotheistic
religion, read it carefully and read carefully the other laws below of
my new monotheistic religion:

--
I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God
in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
"effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
in your day to day life.

--


And here is the second big defect of Sufism:

So read again:

"Sufism is dedication to worship, total dedication to Allah most High,
disregard for the finery and ornament of the world, abstinence from the
pleasure, wealth, and prestige sought by most men, and retiring from
others to worship alone." Ibn Khaldun, quoted in Keller, Nuh Ha Mim, The
Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islam.

But i am your new prophet from God and i say that Sufism is not in
accordance with my new monotheistic religion(read in my thoughts below
about it), since it also lacks flexibility, and it is is like indian
meditation, since Sufism wants from us to stop seeking pleasures of the
senses, but I don't agree with indian meditation that wants us to stop
seeking pleasure of the senses, i think that indian meditation wants
like to solve the problem of materialism that causes problems such as
violence between the rich and not rich etc. but i think that my new
monotheistic religion is much better than Sufism and than indian
meditation, so i invite you to read again carefully all my following
thoughts below so that to understand:

More philosophy of is my new monotheistic religion sufficient..

I am your new prophet from God, and you have to understand that i am
smart and i say that the laws of my new monotheistic religion
are "sufficient", but i have to clear one more thing about one
of the laws of my new monotheistic religion, and here it is:

--

It is my following law of my new monotheistic religion, read it carefully:

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God
in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
"effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
in your day to day life.

--

So you are noticing that God is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define
dirt "symbolically", the dirt also means "defect", so you have to clean
more and more your defects to be presentable in your day to day life in
front of God that is "pure" from "dirt" or "defects", it is like going
with more and more perfection towards a great perfection, so then my law
becomes an engine that pushes us forward with more and more perfection
towards the great perfection, it is like the other engine of my other
law of my new monotheistic religion below, so i think that the laws of
my new monotheistic religion are now sufficient. So you have to follow
the laws of my new monotheistic religion so that God rewards you, and i
will speak about the reward from God in my next post, so i invite you to
notice how i am smartly extracting the laws from the characteristics of
God or the nature of God or the essence of God, so read my following
thoughts of my laws carefully:

More philosophy about the laws of my new monotheistic religion..

Sorry i have just forgotten one of the laws of my new monotheistic
religion, so read again and notice how the laws are extracted from the
characteristics of God or from His essence or His nature:

More philosophy of how i am smart as a prophet from God..

I am your new prophet that is smart, and we can ask a philosophical
question of how i am smart ?

Here is my answer:

My new monotheistic religion is flexible, since first i am showing as a
prophet from God how i am extracting the laws of God from His
characteristics or essence or nature, second i am showing you that
previous monotheistic religions are using many kind of languages, like
a symbolic language that is not truth to strenghten the faith in God or
a language that comes from the curse from God etc., and notice how i am
saying that i am your new prophet that is here to reduce much more the
curse from God, so as you are noticing this is showing that my new
monotheistic religion comes with like the right flexibility or like the
right tolerance, also notice how i am extracting the laws from the
characteristics of God or the nature of God or the essence of God, so
here is how i am extracting the laws, read the following to notice my
smartness:

First law of my new monotheistic religion is the following:

My new monotheistic religion is not darkness, since in my new
monotheistic religion God has the following characteristics:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

My above abstraction of God is so important, since even if God is not
like Love in my new monotheistic religion, notice that he is a greatly
arrogant God, and from this great arrogance of God we can logically
infer that God doesn't like a kind of arrogance of others, so then we
can logically infer from it that we have to know how to help others and
to Love others and be righteous with others by not being arrogance or a
kind of arrogance that doesn't like God.

Second law of my monotheistic religion is the following:

More philosophy about the way to communicate with God in my new
monotheistic religion..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God
in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
"effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
in your day to day life.

Third law of my new monotheistic religion is the following:

More philosophy about the characteristics of God..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say since God is like a perfect
God, so we can ask a philosophical question of does God love smart people ?

In my new monotheistic religion, God doesn't like human smartness since
he is like a perfect God, so he is so powerful, but God can love the
fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions
in the way of God, so then God can be curious like a human and wanting
to look at humans and he can love the fact that a human is surpassing of
himself with smartness and/or actions in the way of God, so i think that
with the other engines below logically inferred from the characteristics
of God, this is an engine that pushes us forward towards more and more
perfection.

Fourth law of my new monotheistic religion that brings more precision is
the following:

More philosophy about purity of God and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that God is like "pure", i
mean he is also pure from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically",
and he is like "perfect", so it is yet one more characteristic of God,
read the other characteristics of God in my below thoughts, so here is
the essence or nature of God in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So from this we can also logically infer the way of communicating with
God, since from those above characteristics of God we can logically
infer that when you communicate with God, you have to believe in Him and
you have to glorify him, and fear Him and ask Him for help, and you have
to be a beautiful patience with God and you have to be "presentable" in
front of Him when you communicate with Him, i mean that you have to be
an effort of being decently "clean" or "much" more clean when you
communicate with God, since God is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define
dirt "symbolically", and also you have to be beautiful patience with God
since he is greatly arrogant, this is how you must behave with God in my
new monotheistic religion.

My new monotheistic religion is not darkness, since in my new
monotheistic religion God has the following characteristics:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

My above abstraction of God is so important, since even if God is not
like Love in my new monotheistic religion, notice that he is a greatly
arrogant God, and from this great arrogance of God we can logically
infer that God doesn't like a kind of arrogance of others, so then we
can logically infer from it that we have to know how to help others and
to Love others and be righteous with others by not being arrogance or a
kind of arrogance that doesn't like God.

More philosophy about what kind of game is playing with us God ?

I am your new prophet from God, and i am here to explain,
so what kind of game is playing with us God ? so when you are stupid
you will think that Islam is stupid or you will say such a thing as
prophet Muhammad is not a prophet from God, but i think this kind of
thinking is stupidity, because you have first to know about the nature
or essence of God, so when you know about his nature or about his
essence you will become much more careful and you will not say stupid
things on Islam, this is why i am explaining to you Islam , by saying
that the nature of God is that he is also greatly arrogant, so you have
to understand it correctly, so he can with his great arrogance be
indifferent to suffering of poor animals or indifferent to suffering of
humans or such things, so you have to understand that God is greatly
arrogant and he can be "dangerous" with His great arrogance, and he is
not like Love, so you have not to wait for Love from God, since you have
to believe in Him and glorify Him and fear Him and ask Him for help and
be a beautiful patience with God, but there is some limitations that you
have to understand, such as Islam is not a timeless religion, so God has
just wanted by Islam to also strenghten faith in Him and he has
programmed prophet Muhammad to use many kinds of languages, like using a
symbolic language that is not the truth (read my below thoughts so that
to understand) , and God has programmed prophet Muhammad to say that he
is the last prophet, but it is not truth since it is part of the curse
from God and it also comes from his great arrogance, so you have to be
really smart and know about what kind of game is playing with us God.

More philosophy about the different conceptions of God..

I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and
neo-nazi website called national vanguard about God:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/08/gods-plan-for-our-kind-alone/

I think i am a smart prophet from God and i am called the reformer of
previous monotheistic religions, and i think that the above conception
of God of white supremacists and neo-nazis is not the right and correct
one, i think that white supremacists and neo-nazis are too much egoistic
and too much selfish, that means they are lacking consideration for
other groups of humans, this is why they are defining God as they are
defining it in the above article, so we have not to accept this
corruption of the minds of white supremacists and neo-nazis, since there
is an inherent rule in my new monotheistic religion and it is that
my new monotheistic religion believes in Jesus Christ and the previous
prophets from God and we notice that even Jesus Christ and the previous
prophets from God were showing the way of helping others and being
compassion with others, and this is an important inherent rule in my new
monotheistic religion. So i invite you to read about my new monotheistic
religion in my below thoughts:

More precision of my philosophy about the monotheistic religions and more..

I think i am smart, and i am your new prophet from God, and here is
an important question:

Do the many logical contradictions in the previous monotheistic
religions make us again free from faith in God and from previous
monotheistic religions and is it good or not ?

This is one of the most important question, since i think that previous
monotheistic religions will not survive because of there many logical
contradictions and this is the most important problem, and it is the
question that is answering my new monotheistic religion, since my new
monotheistic religion is smart and you have to read it carefully so that
you notice how i am smartly strenghtening the faith in God and how i am
smartly making you understand my new monotheistic religion, since i
think that my new monotheistic religion is an advanced monotheistic
religion and it is a futuristic monotheistic religion that makes the
good balance that is required between cooperation and competition and
between the good balance of what we call Al-Insān al-kāmil in arabic or
the perfect man in english that must be a well balance between being of
both divine from God and of earthly origin, and of course my new
monotheistic religion says that God has not created our universe or the
multiverse, and it explains clearly the why and it makes you understand
more, so i invite you to read carefully my thoughts of my new
monotheistic religion in the following link(it is my preliminary
thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them
a pdf and html book), here is the link and read my thoughts of my new
monotheistic religion carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is:

And you can read about the laws of my new monoteistic religion
that i derive from the nature of God etc. in the following link
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI

More of my philosophy about economy and about president Erdogan and about Islam and more..

I invite you to read the following article about president Erdogan:

Lira plunges again after Erdogan cites Islam to defend rate cuts

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20211220-lira-plunges-again-after-erdogan-cites-islam-to-defend-rate-cuts

And notice carefully that it says the following:

"Islamic teachings forbid Muslims from receiving or charging interest on loaned or borrowed money."

But in conventional economic theory, rising interest rates is also a mechanism that permits the fight high inflation, so i think
that Erdogan is not right since i say that Islam is not understood correctly by muslims, and i think that the Islamic teaching that forbids Muslims from receiving or charging interest on loaned or borrowed money is a not timeless law, and here is how my new monotheistic religion is explaining Islam by making you understand the how there is timeless and not timeless laws in Islam:

So i will ask a philosophical question of:

How can you make Islam a much better monotheistic religion ?

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to first to prove that
the Qur'an is not timeless, so i am smart and it is how i am doing it,
since i am proving and showing that there is in the Qur'an the timeless
laws of God and there is in the Qur'an the not timeless laws of God,
and i think that from those not timeless laws of God we can make
Islam a much better religion, and i invite you to read my following
thoughts so that to know how i am doing it:

More of my philosophy about what is Islam..

I am your new prophet from God, and i am called the reformer of
monotheistic religions, and you have to read about my new monotheistic
religion in my below thoughts, but today i will ask a question that is
also philosophical and it is the following:

What is Islam ?

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will say that there is two
types of laws of God, there is the timeless ones and not the timeless
ones, and i am explaining it to you below so that you understand it, so
the most important timeless laws of God are those of: Believing in God
and glorifying him and praying him and fear him and ask him for help,
and from those timeless laws you can derive the other human laws that
are not timeless, also when you look at my below new monotheistic
religion you will notice that it is the same but i am also deriving the
laws of God from the nature and essence of God, read below about my new
monotheistic religion so that you understand that it is smart.

More of my philosophy about Salafism and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and as you have just noticed that i have
just explained to you the two types of Islamic laws so that you
understand that there is Islamic laws from the Qur'an that are not
timeless(read below about them), and here is more logical proof from my
following thoughts about Salafism:

So i will first invite you to look at the following video about Salafism
in Europe:

Bosnia-Hercegovina: Islamists in Sarajevo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oeSAoD6iU

So as you are noticing in the above video, that it shows islamists
Salafists in Bosnia-Hercegovina, but the most important question is the
following:

Is Salafism true Islam ?

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will answer the question as
the following:

First we have to ask if the Qur'an is timeless ?

So my smart answer is the following:

The Qur'an is not timeless because read the following verse of
the Qur'an:

Quranic verse 5:38: "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her
hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and
Allah is Exalted in power."

So if you are smart you will notice that the above verse of the Qur'an
shows that the Qur'an is not timeless, since how can you imagine that
the Qur'an doesn't enumerate the cases where we can be compassion on a
thief and not cut his hands? so since it doesn't enumerate the cases, so
then you are noticing that this verse of the Qur'an shows that the verse
is not a timeless law, but it is a law that was applied in the context
of the time where prophet Muhammad was living or such context, so then
we can logically infer that the Qur'an is not timeless and then we can
say that we can enhance many the laws of the Qur'an, so then Salafism is
not true Islam since it says that the Qur'an and the laws of the Qur'an
are timeless.

I am your new prophet from God, and i invite you to look at the
following video:

A lady listens to lecture on Islam, then challenged me: 'Why is the
Shariah Law so Barbaric?'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tplpm24CA

So as you notice that the lady asked why in Islam the Shariah Law is so
Barbaric, and i think she is not understanding as muslims are not
understanding, but i am your new prophet from God and i am explaining
the following so that you understand:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.

I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the
society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.

More of my philosophy about gays in Islam..

I am your new prophet from God, and i think i am smart, so i invite you
to look at the following video about gays in Islam:

CAN I BE GAY & A MUSLIM? - FASTEST REPLY ON YOUTBE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sRTzaTuaIA

I am noticing that the above video is saying that being gay including
the practice of being gay is haram in Islam, that means it is forbiden
in Islam, and i think that this sort of Islam is not right, and i am
your new prophet from God and i will explain to you Islam so that you
understand:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.

I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the
society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.

More of my philosophy about Taliban and Islam..

I invite you to look at the following new video about Taliban:

Millions of desperate Afghans flee Taliban country ruled by war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpJnn2KLXw4

I am your new prophet from God and you can read carefully about my new
monotheistic religion in my thoughts below, and i have just noticed in
the video above that a seignor minister in the Taliban government is
talking to a white European journalist, but i have just noticed that he
is not well educated, so i don't think that Taliban are following the
rules of Islam since they are not well educated or correctly educated,
second, in Islam you have first to be Islamic democracy so that
to have different point views of Islamic political parties with less or
more perfect ideas that permit Islam to advance correctly, so look for
example at Islamic Iran, In Iran it is an Islamic democracy with
different islamic political parties and with an islamic guide that we
call Sayyid Ali Hosseini
Khamenei(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei), so then Islamic
Iran is a better Islamic governance than Taliban that is dictatorship,
third, i also say that in Islam you have to know how to strengthen the
faith in God, since without faith in God there is no muslim, so then you
have to distinguish between the weak faith and the strong faith, since a
weak faith in God can not be called a muslim, so then certain laws of
Islam don't apply to humans that have a weak faith in God, so i say that
before applying those certain laws of Islam to a human, you have to ask
the human if he has a weak faith in God so that to distinguish and say
that he is not a muslim, and then certain laws don't apply to him.


More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about deforestation and more..

I invite you to read the following article about the environmental footprint of paper vs. electronic books:

https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/

And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about
how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs. electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only
cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account the the other following disadvantages:

The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals.

Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around 200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves 17 trees. If it’s recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/), so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on computers is better than using paper books, and of course i am actually programming with HTML and CSS and Javascript so that to easy the job of creating a sophisticated digital or electronic books with HTML and CSS and Javascript with dynamically configurable HTML and CSS fonts.

And i invite you to read the following articles:

How Useful Is Recycling, Really?

Read more here:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/

How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else?

Read more here:

https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625


Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It

Read more here:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401


More of my philosophy about relativism and about morality and more..

I have just read the following article of white supremacists and neo-nazis of a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:

Ancient Admixture: Death Blow to Racialism? — part 1

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/12/ancient-admixture-death-blow-to-racialism-part-1/


So notice carefully on the above article how it is starting by saying:

"And some of these discoveries do undermine old-fashioned racialism. But they do not undermine the higher racialism — the true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance.."

So notice how it is saying:

"The true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance"

So as you are noticing it is not correct thinking, since I will say that "relativism" is a major disruptor of our mental immune system, but objective standards of right and wrong are our main defences against bad ideas. If we lose those standards, then anything goes, so this is why i say that saying in the above article of white supremacists: "the true understanding held by us in the National Alliance..." is too much certainty, since by reading the above article you will notice that it tries to prove that there is human genetical differences between ethnic groups like the ethnic groups of white and blacks etc., but notice that i am not saying races, since there is only one human race called the human race, but notice carefully that the above certainty of those white supremacists doesn't understand correctly how to introduce the right "randomness" like in Evolutionary algorithms so that to not get stuck in a local minimum and so that to converge towards the global optimum, so i think that this randomness like in Evolutionary algorithms that must be introduced is also allowing a certain level of Genetic mixture to happen inside a group or population, like 25% or so, like allowing Genetic mixture between arabs and white europeans etc. so that to ensure a kind of "diversity" that ensures genetical resilience or resilience. So this why i just said the following:

I think i am a wise type of person, and from my thoughts below about morality, i will say that morality is like mathematics, since morality
is universal as i am explaining below, but so that to be this abstraction of morality that i call "perfection at best", it must be thought really efficiently systemically, so then you notice that it must come with a kind of right patience or right tolerance so that to not be mistakes in the process codification of morality, so morality is in abstraction universal, but so that to be universal in reality it must be thought really efficiently and systemically.

Also the white supremacists and others have to take into account my following thoughts so that to understand correctly:

And read carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress and about genetics:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

And read my following thoughts:

More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Class Struggle and more..

Today i will discuss more about an important subject, so first i invite
you to read my following previous thoughts:

--

"Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions."

--

So as you are noticing in my above thoughts that i just said the following:

"But i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience"

And here is how i will explain it more, look at Financial sector,
so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity that brings "resilience" and that needs a good allocation of resources in capitalism by reading my following thoughts:

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
know what is the problem with finance, and here it is, read the
following so that to understand:

One last chance to fix capitalism

Read more here:

https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism

So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:

How to Improve Capitalism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU

So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by
giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and
not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and
national pension funds representative of the long term collective
interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to
improve capitalism" so that to understand more.

And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
read them here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc


More of my philosophy about the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union and more..

I have just looked at the following video of Olivier Berruyer , born on October 26 , 1975 in Bron that is a French blogger and actuary by profession, and you can read about him more here:

https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Olivier_Berruyer?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en

And here is the video of him:

NOTRE SYSTÈME FINANCIER VA S'EFFONDRER

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BknDh30qnTI


So i think i am smart and i will say that Olivier Berruyer the actuary by profession in the above video is not so smart, since he is for example giving a graphic of the "assets" of the central Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and he is also explaining why it is problematic and he is also saying that the negative interest rate of the central Bank of European Union is something really problematic and that it must not be so, but i think that he is not so smart, since you can look at the graphic in the above video of the "assets" of the central of the Bank of European Union between years 1999 and 2021, and you can notice that it is not so problematic, since the time where this fast growth has happened is not too long and he is not saying that the very important thing to know is that this fast growth of the assets of central Bank of European Union also "coincides" with the crisis of Covid-19 and we have to know that negative interest rates are typically seen during weak economies and/or periods of deflation such as in period of the crisis of Covid-19, and you can read that even in Canada there can also be negative interest rates, read here so that to notice it:

What would negative interest rates mean for Canadians?

https://financialpost.com/moneywise/what-would-negative-interest-rates-mean-for-canadians-3

And it is also related to my following thoughts:

And here is also how i have just explained why the governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic Crisis of Covid-19:

More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more..

I invite you to look at the following new video about how the
governments of Europe and USA are "spending" more in the economy
and are following the Keynesian economics in this period of economic
Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if not
followed all the time, has still its "advantage" in this kind of
economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian
economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy)
strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to
look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it:

The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU

More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about my philosophy..

You have to understand my contributions as a philosopher by reading my
philosophy, but one of my contribution of my philosophy is also related
to the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche articulated ethical dilemma as a tension between the master vs. slave morality; the former in which we make decisions based on the assessment of consequences, and the latter in which we make decisions based on our conception of good vs. evil, but you have to understand my
contribution of my philosophy about morality, since the first of my contribution about morality is that i am giving a kind of logical proof that morality is "universal", but not only that but i have invented quickly a proverb that abstract much more correctly morality so that you understand more, so read it below, so i think from my thoughts below of my contribution to philosophy, that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not so smart, since you will understand from my thoughts below of my philosophy that morality of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an Elitist morality called in his philosophy the morality of the master, but notice that he is not so smart, since the morality of the master in his philosophy has the "tendency" to be great "performance" of perfection, so this is why it can be morality that oppresses people,
so we can then say that morality of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is
the not correct morality, since here again you are noticing that Democracy is a tool that permit to avoid such oppression of the morality
of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to read again some of my contributions to philosophy about morality in my following thoughts, but first i invite you to read my following thoughts
of my philosophy about Utilitrianism so that to understand more that morality of the master of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not the correct one:

More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more..

I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand
another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of
Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true",
since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and
well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future
consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to
be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so
then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical
analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not
to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is
also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this
maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i
think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in
Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about
the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my
redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of
Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my
redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again:

More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more..

So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what
is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it
below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about
this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that
Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being
for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like
"recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule
of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not
dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and
you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that
abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

And read my following other proverbs that i think are flexible from the
start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them
carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


And here is my contributions of my philosophy about morality:

More of my philosophy about morality and more..

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i have also just
invented a proverb that abstract morality, and i invite you to
read it again, and i invite you to read my below thoughts
so that you understand more my logical proof of what is morality and
why it is universal:

And here is my other new proverb:

Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or
process of perfecting"

Read here:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection


This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my
explanation of my new proverb.


Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below:


My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained
to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in
morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware
of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or
encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect.


Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality:


https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4


So here is my new proverb:


"Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!"


So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think
it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on
the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the
pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty
perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty
perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you
have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this
part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It
is what makes it a smart proverb.

More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal..

I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the
requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a
level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see
much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:

So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have
morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and
disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so
that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much
more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there
everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become
perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that
we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.

More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
morality is universal:

So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look
at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example
there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse
it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or
much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or
perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.

More of my philosophy about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism and more..

I think i am a wise type of person and i think i am a philosopher, and first, i invite you to read my following new thoughts about Utilitarianism and more here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wgPJkwdGrqc

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. And of course i have also just invented quickly a proverb and a poem so that to make you understand this way of doing, and here they are:

More of my philosophy about my new proverb about Democracy and more..

As you have just noticed, i have just invented a proverb about Democracy, read it below and read all my other proverbs below, and as you notice in this new proverb that i am saying:

"Since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness"

So this "better and better discuss" means that it is "inherent" to it that we have to also be well educated and that it needs Elitism, and as you are noticing in my new proverb that i am saying that Democracy needs Elitism that is existence of an elite as a dominating element in a system or society such as congressmen and congresswomen of the USA congress. So i invite you to read my new proverb and all my following thoughts so that to understand:

Here is my new proverb:

"The basis of Democracy is not that people have to govern, since it is
inferiority of Democracy, since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness, and after bringing this good sageness and good soundness, we can govern correctly with this good sageness and good soundness, this is why Democracy needs Elitism such as the congressmen and congresswomen of the USA congress so that to bring good sageness and good soundness."

And of course you can read my just new poem below that also speaks
about the basis of Democracy:

And read my other new proverbs below that i have written quickly..

Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable amount of natural light.


So here is my new poem:


Darkness for me is not madness

Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss is not loneliness and is not being novice

Darkness for me is not madness

Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.