Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Roy Culley Pick Your Face Off The FLOOR!

30 views
Skip to first unread message

John A. Bailo

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 11:58:20 PM1/12/07
to

Roy,

Is it old age, or just lack of FIGHT?

In any case, don't say good-bye, just get out of here and dwindle away.

Don't WHINE and put your heart on your sleeve, the forum called COLA!

--
Texeme Construct
updated 1/9/07 http://john-bailo.blogspot.com/
updated often http://you-read-it-here-first.com
Bad Memes Weekly http://texeme.com/writing/badmemes.text

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 4:11:39 AM1/13/07
to
John A. Bailo wrote:

>
> Roy,
>
> Is it old age, or just lack of FIGHT?
>
> In any case, don't say good-bye, just get out of here and dwindle away.
>
> Don't WHINE and put your heart on your sleeve, the forum called COLA!
>

Idiot
--
Only two things are infinite,
the Universe and Stupidity.
And I'm not quite sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein

Roy Schestowitz

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 7:35:18 AM1/13/07
to
__/ [ Peter Köhlmann ] on Saturday 13 January 2007 09:11 \__

> John A. Bailo wrote:
>
>>
>> Roy,
>>
>> Is it old age, or just lack of FIGHT?
>>
>> In any case, don't say good-bye, just get out of here and dwindle away.
>>
>> Don't WHINE and put your heart on your sleeve, the forum called COLA!
>>
>
> Idiot

I'd second that in this case.

--
~~ Best regards

Roy S. Schestowitz | Linux: does exactly what it says on the tin
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 0.70 0.82 0.90 3/121 2094
http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative

Tim Smith

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 1:26:14 PM1/13/07
to
In article <4539148.y...@schestowitz.com>,

Roy Schestowitz <newsg...@schestowitz.com> wrote:
> __/ [ Peter Köhlmann ] on Saturday 13 January 2007 09:11 \__
>
> > John A. Bailo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Roy,
> >>
> >> Is it old age, or just lack of FIGHT?
> >>
> >> In any case, don't say good-bye, just get out of here and dwindle away.
> >>
> >> Don't WHINE and put your heart on your sleeve, the forum called COLA!
> >>
> >
> > Idiot
>
> I'd second that in this case.

Bailo posts more on-topic advocacy posts than you and Culley combined.

--
--Tim Smith

Maverick

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 1:38:13 PM1/13/07
to
Tim Smith wrote:

So sayeth the trailer dweller in Bummertown.

DFS

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 1:39:33 PM1/13/07
to
Maverick wrote:
> Tim Smith wrote:

>> Bailo posts more on-topic advocacy posts than you and Culley
>> combined.
>
> So sayeth the trailer dweller in Bummertown.

I see the wife is letting you post today.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 9:43:34 PM1/13/07
to
DFS wrote:

Yep. Say, by chance do you shack up with a guy by the name of J.C.?

DFS

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 10:36:26 PM1/13/07
to
Maverick wrote:

> DFS wrote:
>
>> I see the wife is letting you post today.
>>
> Yep.

Sadly, you're speaking the truth. How does an adult man let his wife wear
the pants in the house, and control his life? wtf.

> Say, by chance do you shack up with a guy by the name of J.C.?

Is he your son or your brother?

RonB

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 11:20:53 PM1/13/07
to
DFS wrote:

> Sadly, you're speaking the truth.  How does an adult man let his wife wear
> the pants in the house, and control his life?  wtf.

You're not married, are you?

--
RonB
"There's a story there...somewhere"

DFS

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 11:46:08 PM1/13/07
to
RonB wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> Sadly, you're speaking the truth. How does an adult man let his wife
>> wear the pants in the house, and control his life? wtf.
>
> You're not married, are you?

wtf? Another pv$$y-whipped lamer?

I am married, and I don't consult my wife on any decision relating to my
money, my investing, my spending, my computers, etc. Nor does she ask for
my permission - or even my advice - on how to spend or invest her money (she
makes a lot).

Go watch The Island of Dr. Moreau - the both of you - then ask yourself "Are
we not men?"

ATF

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 11:47:24 PM1/13/07
to
DFS wrote:

> Maverick wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> I see the wife is letting you post today.
>>>
>> Yep.
>
> Sadly, you're speaking the truth. How does an adult man let his wife wear
> the pants in the house, and control his life? wtf.

Well, doesn't that say a lot about DFS. No wonder he's single.

ATF

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 11:49:52 PM1/13/07
to
RonB wrote:

> DFS wrote:
>
>> Sadly, you're speaking the truth.  How does an adult man let his wife
>> wear the pants in the house, and control his life?  wtf.
>
> You're not married, are you?

That's been obvious for a while, eh...

DFS

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 11:51:52 PM1/13/07
to

You're now the 3rd pansy-ass on cola to bow down and play subservient
househusband to women. I know it's a slightly humorous cliche to tell your
buddies "Let me ask the wife if I can play golf Saturday", but what's wrong
with you guys? Linux shrivel your testes?

fyi - I'm not single.


Tim Smith

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 12:05:08 AM1/14/07
to
In article <9Aiqh.1454$FL5...@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,

> Go watch The Island of Dr. Moreau - the both of you - then ask yourself "Are
> we not men?"

We are DEVO.

--
--Tim Smith

ATF

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 12:11:16 AM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:

Well, your racism was well established in the past, so this attitude to
women and marriage doesn't come as much of a surprise :)



> fyi - I'm not single.

I doubt it. If so then poor girl. And not for much longer, eh?

John A. Bailo

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 12:12:49 AM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:


> I

You are nothing...there is no way of verifying anything you say about
yourself and you have made up multiple conflicting accounts of yourself
while in COLA.

--
updated 1/13/07 http://john-bailo.blogspot.com/

ATF

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 12:17:25 AM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:

> RonB wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> Sadly, you're speaking the truth. How does an adult man let his wife
>>> wear the pants in the house, and control his life? wtf.
>>
>> You're not married, are you?
>
> wtf? Another pv$$y-whipped lamer?
>
> I am married, and I don't consult my wife on any decision relating to my
> money, my investing, my spending, my computers, etc. Nor does she ask for
> my permission - or even my advice - on how to spend or invest her money
> (she makes a lot).

Separate lives, eh. Beginning of the end or not really married. Sort of just
cohabiting, eh :) Or are we talking about your flatmate :)

We tend to get on a bit better than that and discuss everything. But then we
are on speaking terms ;)

DFS

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 12:46:27 AM1/14/07
to
ATF wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> ATF wrote:
>>> DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maverick wrote:
>>>>> DFS wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I see the wife is letting you post today.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yep.
>>>>
>>>> Sadly, you're speaking the truth. How does an adult man let his
>>>> wife wear the pants in the house, and control his life? wtf.
>>>
>>> Well, doesn't that say a lot about DFS. No wonder he's single.
>>
>> You're now the 3rd pansy-ass on cola to bow down and play subservient
>> househusband to women. I know it's a slightly humorous cliche to
>> tell your buddies "Let me ask the wife if I can play golf Saturday",
>> but what's wrong
>> with you guys? Linux shrivel your testes?
>
> Well, your racism was well established in the past,

Yes.


> so this attitude to women and marriage doesn't
> come as much of a surprise :)

I have a healthy, modern attitude. I respect women, and my wife, very much.

>> fyi - I'm not single.
>
> I doubt it. If so then poor girl. And not for much longer, eh?

Doubt away.

DFS

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 12:47:57 AM1/14/07
to
John A. Bailo wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>
>> I
>
> You are nothing...there is no way of verifying anything you say about
> yourself

This is true. You have to be stupid to publish your name and address on
cola. It's filled with mean children - Lord of the Flies type wackjobs.

> and you have made up multiple conflicting accounts of
> yourself while in COLA.

Show me.


DFS

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 12:54:10 AM1/14/07
to
ATF wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> RonB wrote:
>>> DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sadly, you're speaking the truth. How does an adult man let his
>>>> wife wear the pants in the house, and control his life? wtf.
>>>
>>> You're not married, are you?
>>
>> wtf? Another pv$$y-whipped lamer?
>>
>> I am married, and I don't consult my wife on any decision relating
>> to my money, my investing, my spending, my computers, etc. Nor does
>> she ask for my permission - or even my advice - on how to spend or
>> invest her money (she makes a lot).
>
> Separate lives, eh. Beginning of the end or not really married. Sort
> of just cohabiting, eh :) Or are we talking about your flatmate :)

When I say I don't consult with her I mean I don't solicit her advice for
some things. I respect her privacy and her right to make her own decisions,
and she respects mine. It may sound like "separate lives" to you, but I
wouldn't have it any other way.


> We tend to get on a bit better than that and discuss everything. But
> then we are on speaking terms ;)

Yeah well, some days are better than others.

wjbell

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 3:38:31 AM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:
> ATF wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> RonB wrote:
>>>> DFS wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sadly, you're speaking the truth. How does an adult man let his
>>>>> wife wear the pants in the house, and control his life? wtf.
>>>>
>>>> You're not married, are you?
>>>
>>> wtf? Another pv$$y-whipped lamer?
>>>
>>> I am married, and I don't consult my wife on any decision relating
>>> to my money, my investing, my spending, my computers, etc. Nor does
>>> she ask for my permission - or even my advice - on how to spend or
>>> invest her money (she makes a lot).
>>
>> Separate lives, eh. Beginning of the end or not really married. Sort
>> of just cohabiting, eh :) Or are we talking about your flatmate :)
>
> When I say I don't consult with her I mean I don't solicit her advice for
> some things. I respect her privacy and her right to make her own decisions,
> and she respects mine. It may sound like "separate lives" to you, but I
> wouldn't have it any other way.
>

Same here. My wife and I don't *need* to consult each other on
decisions. We sometimes do, but that doesn't mean I have to call her to
make sure it's "OK" if I buy that monitor I want, etc. And visa versa.
So I hear ya...

>
>> We tend to get on a bit better than that and discuss everything. But
>> then we are on speaking terms ;)
>
> Yeah well, some days are better than others.
>
>
>


--
wjbell

Peter K abandon his firewall lie:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e6eaf7e09552e5e2?hl=en

Jim R failing to address the issue after being asked:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ad37ca14a2d7224?hl=en

And of course, Roy Culley -- COLAs loyal hall monitor:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=cola+stats&hl=en&as_uauthors=roy+culley
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/578bb2221ad0453c?hl=en

ATF

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 4:03:01 AM1/14/07
to
wjbell wrote:

Well, in our case we spend a lot of time together and talk, so I wouldn't
NEED to call her about a new monitor either. She would already know it was
broken or I was thinking about a new one...

But it would not be good form to go anywhere unusual without checking what
she had planned for that day, or vice versa. And I wouldn't go buy a new TV
for the lounge without having a chat about it... But then we would have
already been having a chat about it...

So... I would certainly check with her before going to play golf. Then she
would insist I go to the doctor for wanting to do such a stupid mindless
thing like play golf. ;)

Damian O'Leary

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 5:00:06 AM1/14/07
to
ATF wrote:

What makes you think even for one minute that anyone want to hear about
your "being married" fantasies? For a start its almost certainly lies, and
even if true what makes you think anyone gives a shit that you are pussy
whipped and feel the need to tell your spouse everything? The fact is that
you probably live in your mothers basement like Roy does.


ATF

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 7:11:18 AM1/14/07
to
Damian O'Leary wrote:

Mick O'Troll shows us all we need about himself :)

Maverick

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 2:11:17 PM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:

nah... it was devlins pivot boy.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 2:12:16 PM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:

Guffaw! You aren't married. If you were, and just decided to blow your
money on anything you wanted without first consulting with your wife...

That puts you in the spousal abusers class.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 2:13:14 PM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:

Either you are a liar or you beat your wife. Which is it??

Maverick

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 2:14:33 PM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:

> ATF wrote:
>
>>DFS wrote:
>>
>>
>>>ATF wrote:
>>>
>>>>DFS wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Maverick wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>DFS wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I see the wife is letting you post today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yep.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sadly, you're speaking the truth. How does an adult man let his
>>>>>wife wear the pants in the house, and control his life? wtf.
>>>>
>>>>Well, doesn't that say a lot about DFS. No wonder he's single.
>>>
>>>You're now the 3rd pansy-ass on cola to bow down and play subservient
>>>househusband to women. I know it's a slightly humorous cliche to
>>>tell your buddies "Let me ask the wife if I can play golf Saturday",
>>>but what's wrong
>>>with you guys? Linux shrivel your testes?
>>
>>Well, your racism was well established in the past,
>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>
>>so this attitude to women and marriage doesn't
>>come as much of a surprise :)
>
>
> I have a healthy, modern attitude. I respect women, and my wife, very much.
>

No you don't. You're a wife beater.
Better known as a pure dick head.

>
>
>
>>>fyi - I'm not single.
>>
>>I doubt it. If so then poor girl. And not for much longer, eh?
>
>
> Doubt away.
>

She's already filed for divorce and will also take your computer away
from you. :-))

cc

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 2:41:37 PM1/14/07
to

Arguing over whether someone is really married or not... the Internet
is fully of crazies.

DFS

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 6:20:21 PM1/14/07
to
ATF wrote:

> Then she would insist I go to the doctor for wanting to do such a
> stupid mindless thing like play golf. ;)

People that call golf stupid are usually broke and envious. Or they're too
uncoordinated to swing a golf club. Or just uninformed. Maybe you're all
4?

It's a nearly perfect game: played in beautiful outdoor scenery, very
challenging, decent form of exercise, can play and improve most of your
life, can make friends and business deals on the course, etc.

Best of all is the point when you've played enough to feel you have some
control over the ball, and are confident hitting a variety of shots: bump
and runs off the green, pitches, 100 yard wedge, hitting a fade or draw with
your driver. It usually takes years to achieve a competent, consistent golf
game.

Personally, I've played about 250 rounds over the last 8 years. Shot one
round of 80, another 5 or 10 rounds below 90, most of my scores have been in
the mid-to-high 90s. My avg tee shot is 230-240 yards.

It's just an awesome game overall. The only drawback is the cost and the
time. Good equipment costs several hundred dollars, balls cost about $1
each new (and they're easy to lose) and a single round on a decent course is
around $35 and up, and takes 5-6 hours between driving there and back.

AB

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 7:59:32 PM1/14/07
to
On 2007-01-14, Maverick <S...@mustang.org> claimed:

I believe he's not single. New York or Taxxachusetts or someplace
legalized his kinda marriage. Maybe he's telling the truth and *he's*
the wife.

--
Dogs crawl under fences. Software crawls under Windows.

Tim Fairchild

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 8:50:17 PM1/14/07
to
DFS wrote:

> ATF wrote:
>
>> Then she would insist I go to the doctor for wanting to do such a
>> stupid mindless thing like play golf. ;)
>
> People that call golf stupid are usually broke and envious. Or they're
> too
> uncoordinated to swing a golf club. Or just uninformed. Maybe you're all
> 4?
>
> It's a nearly perfect game: played in beautiful outdoor scenery, very
> challenging, decent form of exercise, can play and improve most of your
> life, can make friends and business deals on the course, etc.

I prefer dog sports, and people think that is mad as well. Challenging,
quite a lot of exercise, lots of outdoor scenery especially with tracking,
lots of travel to interesting places, many people to meet, good friends,
social activity, etc.

Its a nice activity, and you get to do it with man's best friend.

> Best of all is the point when you've played enough to feel you have some
> control over the ball, and are confident hitting a variety of shots: bump
> and runs off the green, pitches, 100 yard wedge, hitting a fade or draw
> with
> your driver. It usually takes years to achieve a competent, consistent
> golf game.
>
> Personally, I've played about 250 rounds over the last 8 years. Shot one
> round of 80, another 5 or 10 rounds below 90, most of my scores have been
> in
> the mid-to-high 90s. My avg tee shot is 230-240 yards.
>
> It's just an awesome game overall. The only drawback is the cost and the
> time. Good equipment costs several hundred dollars, balls cost about $1
> each new (and they're easy to lose) and a single round on a decent course
> is around $35 and up, and takes 5-6 hours between driving there and back.

Sounds like a nice cheap sport compared to dogs. Even an ordinary tested dog
will run $1000 now, tho you might get a range from $500 -$1500. Vet bills
run well into the $100's per year. Breeding a litter costs $1000 or more,
some of which you might recoup. The dogs here eat about $500 per month.
Then there are leads, crates, harnesses, training, equipment, 1000's of km
in travel...

Time, well, yes. An ordinary agility/obedience trial might run 8 hours per
day for two days. A tracking trial is more like a full 3 day weekend. And
then there are the hours, or occasionally days, traveling...


cc

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 10:40:22 PM1/14/07
to

A gay joke, classy.

DFS

unread,
Jan 14, 2007, 11:21:38 PM1/14/07
to
Tim Fairchild wrote:

> I prefer dog sports, and people think that is mad as well.
> Challenging, quite a lot of exercise, lots of outdoor scenery
> especially with tracking, lots of travel to interesting places, many
> people to meet, good friends, social activity, etc.
>
> Its a nice activity, and you get to do it with man's best friend.
>

> Sounds like a nice cheap sport compared to dogs. Even an ordinary
> tested dog will run $1000 now, tho you might get a range from $500
> -$1500. Vet bills run well into the $100's per year. Breeding a
> litter costs $1000 or more, some of which you might recoup. The dogs
> here eat about $500 per month. Then there are leads, crates,
> harnesses, training, equipment, 1000's of km in travel...
>
> Time, well, yes. An ordinary agility/obedience trial might run 8
> hours per day for two days. A tracking trial is more like a full 3
> day weekend. And then there are the hours, or occasionally days,
> traveling...

Geez, it wasn't a contest. Sounds like you need to play some golf to
relieve the stress of your dog activities.

note: my friends are both sleeping at my feet right now - the little one is
snoring :)

Tim Fairchild

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 12:13:52 AM1/15/07
to
DFS wrote:

It is a stress relief. As for contest, you were the one suggesting people
were too cheap to play golf. I was simply pointing out that other fun
activities can cost money... The dig at golf was just a troll anyway.

I don't play golf as I find it flat boring. Some people like football. Hell,
some people play lawn bowls and cricket... Each to their own...

> note: my friends are both sleeping at my feet right now - the little one
> is snoring :)

Yeah, they can be great to have around...

Jamie Hart

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 4:29:15 AM1/15/07
to
DFS wrote:
> ATF wrote:
>
>> Then she would insist I go to the doctor for wanting to do such a
>> stupid mindless thing like play golf. ;)
>
> People that call golf stupid are usually broke and envious. Or they're too
> uncoordinated to swing a golf club. Or just uninformed. Maybe you're all
> 4?
>
> It's a nearly perfect game: played in beautiful outdoor scenery, very
> challenging, decent form of exercise, can play and improve most of your
> life, can make friends and business deals on the course, etc.
>
Really, the only down side is that you have to spend time with the sort
of people who like to play golf.

> Best of all is the point when you've played enough to feel you have some
> control over the ball, and are confident hitting a variety of shots: bump
> and runs off the green, pitches, 100 yard wedge, hitting a fade or draw with
> your driver. It usually takes years to achieve a competent, consistent golf
> game.
>

Even better is when you realise that you don't need to mess about with
all that hitting balls with a stick. Wasn't it Mark Twain who said
"Golf is a terrible way to ruin a good walk"?

> Personally, I've played about 250 rounds over the last 8 years. Shot one
> round of 80, another 5 or 10 rounds below 90, most of my scores have been in
> the mid-to-high 90s. My avg tee shot is 230-240 yards.
>

Just imagine all the wonderful things you could have been doing if you
hadn't wasted all that time practicing to put a ball in a little hole.

> It's just an awesome game overall. The only drawback is the cost and the
> time. Good equipment costs several hundred dollars, balls cost about $1
> each new (and they're easy to lose) and a single round on a decent course is
> around $35 and up, and takes 5-6 hours between driving there and back.
>

Just to drag this a bit closer to on topic, I did some work a few years
ago for a company that provides the fertilisers used on the greens for
the larger golf courses in England and Scotland. If you ever wonder why
a round of golf is so expensive, it's so that the greenkeeper can afford
to buy the fertiliser he needs.

That is seriously expensive stuff, each course has their own particular
blend and the major courses have different blends for different times of
year. Each blend is a mix of upwards of a dozen different ingredients
measured and mixed individualy. they even clean down the machines
between blends so that ingredients from one don't contaminate the next.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 1:36:08 PM1/15/07
to
cc wrote:

It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a fool
would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then he'll
stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 1:37:09 PM1/15/07
to
AB wrote:

Taxxachusetts!?! LOL!!!

Well, he did comment a couple of years ago about how I should be
slapped. Sounds like a bitch to me, more than a man.

DFS

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 1:51:07 PM1/15/07
to
Maverick wrote:

> Well, he did comment a couple of years ago about how I should be
> slapped. Sounds like a bitch to me, more than a man.

What would your master say if she knew you were using such harsh language?

Sandman

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 2:51:21 PM1/15/07
to
In article <idadnSXKjpo9VDbY...@bresnan.com>,
Maverick <S...@mustang.org> wrote:

> > Arguing over whether someone is really married or not... the Internet
> > is fully of crazies.
>
> It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a fool
> would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then he'll
> stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.

Haha, the "He can't be married, he's spending too much money" line? :)

I spend lots of money as well, and I'm also married. Go figure. :)


--
Sandman[.net]

Linonut

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 3:15:36 PM1/15/07
to
After takin' a swig o' grog, Maverick belched out this bit o' wisdom:

>>>That puts you in the spousal abusers class.
>>
>> Arguing over whether someone is really married or not... the Internet
>> is fully of crazies.
>
> It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a fool
> would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then he'll
> stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.

It's not so much the threat of divorce, as making your every moment at
home a living hell.

My wife used to dole out my weekly allowance, $20, and then quiz me
about where I spent it, as she didn't expect me to buy snacks and such.

She's a lot more tolerant now, and it took years of resistance. I can
buy a $120 UPS when I need to.

--
Don't flip the Bozo Bit.

Linonut

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 3:17:59 PM1/15/07
to
After takin' a swig o' grog, DFS belched out this bit o' wisdom:

My wife has gotten used to harsh language. What surprises me is that
there are /still/ words she hasn't heard. I'd bet dollars to donuts
that she doesn't know "felcher", but I'd prefer that definition come
through her coworkers, who taught her the meaning of "snowballing".

--
So, Bill, what do you think of the execution of Microsoft's Vista team?
Sounds like a good idea to me, Steve.

DFS

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 4:13:02 PM1/15/07
to
Maverick wrote:

> It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a
> fool would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then
> he'll stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.

ffs, quit bleating about your wife controlling your every move. It's
pathetic. You're whipped, and from various comments you've made, nearly
broke. I'm neither.

Sometime in the next few months I'm going to buy outright a new auto (or
maybe a small SUV like the Mazda CX-7), and I won't even tell her which day
I'm going to buy it, or which model, or how much I'll be spending. She'll
come home and it will just be there in the garage.

And who said anything about blowing money willy-nilly? Of course I don't do
that. But even if I did blow it, say on gambling or drugs, it's my money -
not hers - and I'll do what I want with it. She has plenty of her own - she
doesn't feel the need to control mine like your master obviously does.

DFS

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 4:22:44 PM1/15/07
to
Linonut wrote:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Maverick belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>>>> That puts you in the spousal abusers class.
>>>
>>> Arguing over whether someone is really married or not... the
>>> Internet is fully of crazies.
>>
>> It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a
>> fool would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then
>> he'll stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.
>
> It's not so much the threat of divorce, as making your every moment at
> home a living hell.
>
> My wife used to dole out my weekly allowance, $20, and then quiz me
> about where I spent it, as she didn't expect me to buy snacks and
> such.

You have got to be kidding, Linonut. You're the fourth totally whipped
"advocate" who has come forth admitting to being on a damn leash. This is
absurd.

> She's a lot more tolerant now, and it took years of resistance.

You need to shut her down real quick on that front. Unless you're both on
the edge of destitution, your spending is your business. In my opinion.

> I can buy a $120 UPS when I need to.

Ugh! I can't stand to hear about the spending habits of grown men being
controlled by their women.

Well, at least you're master of your operating system, right? That's some
consolation to you guys, I guess.

John A. Bailo

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 4:34:50 PM1/15/07
to
DFS wrote:

> You're the fourth totally whipped
> "advocate" who has come forth admitting to being on a damn leash.


Look out pawn. Your chessmaster is about to sacrifice you.


--
updated 1/13/07 http://john-bailo.blogspot.com/
updated often http://you-read-it-here-first.com
updated 1/13/07 http://antimeme.blogspot.com/
new; not ready: http://HydrogenPark.blogspot.com, copyright John A. Bailo,
2007.

Tim Smith

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 5:27:49 PM1/15/07
to
On 2007-01-15, Linonut <lin...@bone.com> wrote:
> My wife has gotten used to harsh language. What surprises me is that
> there are /still/ words she hasn't heard. I'd bet dollars to donuts
> that she doesn't know "felcher", but I'd prefer that definition come
> through her coworkers, who taught her the meaning of "snowballing".

Felcher is obscure enough that they used the name "Felcher & Sons" as
the name of a fictitious company in a Super Bowl ad, and had a character
in that ad named something like "Ron Felcher", and there was basically
no notice in the media that they'd slipped a very bad word in.

Also, the piano Big Gay Al plays in the South Park movie (and I think in
some regular episodes of the series) is a "Felchers & Son".

Linonut

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 5:50:25 PM1/15/07
to
After takin' a swig o' grog, DFS belched out this bit o' wisdom:

> Linonut wrote:
>>>
>>> It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a
>>> fool would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then
>>> he'll stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.
>>
>> It's not so much the threat of divorce, as making your every moment at
>> home a living hell.
>>
>> My wife used to dole out my weekly allowance, $20, and then quiz me
>> about where I spent it, as she didn't expect me to buy snacks and
>> such.
>
> You have got to be kidding, Linonut. You're the fourth totally whipped
> "advocate" who has come forth admitting to being on a damn leash. This is
> absurd.

No, it isn't.

>> She's a lot more tolerant now, and it took years of resistance.
>
> You need to shut her down real quick on that front. Unless you're both on
> the edge of destitution, your spending is your business. In my opinion.

Not when we share our income.

>> I can buy a $120 UPS when I need to.
>
> Ugh! I can't stand to hear about the spending habits of grown men being
> controlled by their women.
>
> Well, at least you're master of your operating system, right? That's some
> consolation to you guys, I guess.

Your perspective on sharing is odd, to me.

We've made a life together, and the initial control has toned down a
lot.

My wife can drive me nuts sometimes, but she's a good woman, a sharp
investor, and, thanks to her in large part, we'll have a secure
retirement.

--
To boldly go where I surely don't belong.

Tim Fairchild

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 6:33:23 PM1/15/07
to
DFS wrote:

> John A. Bailo wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I
>>
>> You are nothing...there is no way of verifying anything you say about
>> yourself
>
> This is true. You have to be stupid to publish your name and address on
> cola. It's filled with mean children - Lord of the Flies type wackjobs.

I've used my real name on usenet and other forums for decades, and my phone
number is easily accessible. Even my address. I've never had any trouble
with that at all. I've never even received a phone call. But then this is
because most trolls are insecure and tend to hide behind their nyms. They
wouldn't have the balls to ring anyone directly, and even if they did they
would have a nervous giggle and hang up. Most are just kids anyway.

Call me stupid if you like, but if you don't have the balls to stand behind
what you say than I suppose you need to be anonymous...

>> and you have made up multiple conflicting accounts of
>> yourself while in COLA.
>
> Show me.

Tim Fairchild

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 6:44:21 PM1/15/07
to
DFS wrote:

> Linonut wrote:
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Maverick belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>>>> That puts you in the spousal abusers class.
>>>>
>>>> Arguing over whether someone is really married or not... the
>>>> Internet is fully of crazies.
>>>
>>> It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a
>>> fool would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then
>>> he'll stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.
>>
>> It's not so much the threat of divorce, as making your every moment at
>> home a living hell.
>>
>> My wife used to dole out my weekly allowance, $20, and then quiz me
>> about where I spent it, as she didn't expect me to buy snacks and
>> such.
>
> You have got to be kidding, Linonut. You're the fourth totally whipped
> "advocate" who has come forth admitting to being on a damn leash. This is
> absurd.

I let her handle most of the money. Saves me a job. It doesn't mean I don't
have access to the accounts, but it makes life easier having one person in
charge of the bills. Technically she does have her own account and I have
mine, but we have access to each other. In any case the resources are
pooled.

>> She's a lot more tolerant now, and it took years of resistance.
>
> You need to shut her down real quick on that front. Unless you're both on
> the edge of destitution, your spending is your business. In my opinion.

What we spend is usually a combined effort. We tend to do most things
together. Heck we even shop for groceries together. We have a discussions
even about what we get there as it does have to fit some sort of budget.
Due to our rural situation, a grocery run can cost $800 at times, so some
care and thought is needed.

We don't have a huge amount of money to play with, but then making lots of
money isn't a primary goal.

>> I can buy a $120 UPS when I need to.
>
> Ugh! I can't stand to hear about the spending habits of grown men being
> controlled by their women.

Some of us just don't live separate lives like you do, that's all. You can
choose to look at it as her controlling my spending, on me controlling
hers. On just that it's a team effort.

DFS

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 7:04:44 PM1/15/07
to
John A. Bailo wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> You're the fourth totally whipped
>> "advocate" who has come forth admitting to being on a damn leash.
>
>
> Look out pawn. Your chessmaster is about to sacrifice you.

Only you have worked for Microsoft.

flatfish+++

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 10:05:15 PM1/15/07
to

I'll admit I didn't know what either fleching or snowballing meant but I
have heard the word felcher on TV.

The 70's sitcom 'All In The Family'.
Archie Bunker mangles the Reverend FLETCHER's name and often calls him
the Reverend FELCHER to which Edith corrects him and he says 'whatever'.

Of course in these days some words and phrases have taken on an entirely
new meaning.

Happy and gay for one................

ws

unread,
Jan 15, 2007, 11:11:28 PM1/15/07
to

Well, it's better than Big Brother rejecting a legitimate name just
because it *thinks* it's bad:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/08/msn_bans_scroogle/

--
change to leews to mail

Episiotomy McScroogle

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 7:23:28 AM1/16/07
to
After takin' a swig o' grog, ws belched out this bit o' wisdom:

> Well, it's better than Big Brother rejecting a legitimate name just
> because it *thinks* it's bad:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/08/msn_bans_scroogle/

Heyyyyy. Scroogle's a fine family name.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 2:25:13 PM1/16/07
to
Sandman wrote:

Spend too much and you'll find out the hard way.
I've seen this problem all too often. I know of one guy that divorced
his wife because she couldn't control her spending. Getting over
$50,000 in credit card debt while he's retired isn't a good position to
get into.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 2:27:05 PM1/16/07
to
Linonut wrote:

It's the budget that counts. Plus, having some savings in case of great
need is a must these days.
Spending it away frivously can make your partner pretty nervous. Having
a medical emergency and no savings can lead to nightmares, and usually
the most common bankruptcy problem.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 2:27:38 PM1/16/07
to
DFS wrote:

Nah... you are definitely not married. Most women today won't tolerate
that kind of abuse.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 2:28:34 PM1/16/07
to
Linonut wrote:

Same here. Life is easier because of it.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 2:32:04 PM1/16/07
to
DFS wrote:

> Maverick wrote:
>
>
>>It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a
>>fool would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then
>>he'll stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.
>
>
> ffs, quit bleating about your wife controlling your every move.

Guffaw!! She isn't. You just imagine that this is the case, and a
situation you most fear I presume.

> It's
> pathetic. You're whipped, and from various comments you've made, nearly
> broke. I'm neither.
>

Nope. Not at all. Just your imagination running wild.

> Sometime in the next few months I'm going to buy outright a new auto (or
> maybe a small SUV like the Mazda CX-7), and I won't even tell her which day
> I'm going to buy it, or which model, or how much I'll be spending. She'll
> come home and it will just be there in the garage.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> And who said anything about blowing money willy-nilly?

That's blowing money willy-nilly.

> Of course I don't do
> that. But even if I did blow it, say on gambling or drugs, it's my money -
> not hers - and I'll do what I want with it. She has plenty of her own - she
> doesn't feel the need to control mine like your master obviously does.
>

Fine if you have a mountain of money between you. But when it is gone,
watch the change come on when she sees things differently. You'll
either make changes or part company.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 2:32:31 PM1/16/07
to
DFS wrote:

Hi bitch.

Sandman

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 3:12:03 PM1/16/07
to
In article <X9qdnew785s_uzDY...@bresnan.com>,
Maverick <S...@mustang.org> wrote:

> > Haha, the "He can't be married, he's spending too much money" line? :)
> >
> > I spend lots of money as well, and I'm also married. Go figure. :)
>
> Spend too much and you'll find out the hard way.

Find out what the hard way?

> I've seen this problem all too often. I know of one guy that divorced
> his wife because she couldn't control her spending. Getting over
> $50,000 in credit card debt while he's retired isn't a good position to
> get into.

We don't have that problem since we don't need, or use, credit.


--
Sandman[.net]

DFS

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 3:44:57 PM1/16/07
to
Maverick wrote:

> Nah... you are definitely not married. Most women today won't
> tolerate that kind of abuse.

What abuse are you talking about?

You're a freakin' retired old fossil. You don't know anything about
"today's" women.

My guess is your wife literally tells you when to get up, what to wear, what
to eat, when to go to bed, what to watch on TV, how fast you can drive, what
you can or can't buy...

Sounds to me like your spirit is broken, and you're resigned to your wife
controlling your entire life. Why?


DFS

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 3:45:06 PM1/16/07
to


Now you let your master call you "bitch"?

Grow up and get a pair. I guess you never were head of your household, but
you could at least act like a man. You are a man, aren't you?


DFS

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 3:47:44 PM1/16/07
to
Maverick wrote:
> DFS wrote:

>> ffs, quit bleating about your wife controlling your every move.
>
> Guffaw!! She isn't. You just imagine that this is the case, and a
> situation you most fear I presume.

She isn't, huh? It wasn't very long ago that you made statements on cola to
the effect "I'll have to get permission from my wife to buy a new computer".

That's just plain sick.

And I bet anything you told her you were going to be surfing the Internet
before you logged on.

>> It's
>> pathetic. You're whipped, and from various comments you've made,
>> nearly broke. I'm neither.
>
> Nope. Not at all. Just your imagination running wild.

If you have to think about a budget when you're considering whether to spend
$2,000-$3,000 on a new computer - and you've also made comments to that
effect - you are nearly broke. At least in my book.


>> Sometime in the next few months I'm going to buy outright a new auto
>> (or maybe a small SUV like the Mazda CX-7), and I won't even tell
>> her which day I'm going to buy it, or which model, or how much I'll
>> be spending. She'll come home and it will just be there in the
>> garage.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>> And who said anything about blowing money willy-nilly?
>
> That's blowing money willy-nilly.

How so? I need a new auto. Mine's over 10 years old :(


>> Of course I don't do
>> that. But even if I did blow it, say on gambling or drugs, it's my
>> money - not hers - and I'll do what I want with it. She has plenty
>> of her own - she doesn't feel the need to control mine like your
>> master obviously does.
>
> Fine if you have a mountain of money between you. But when it is
> gone, watch the change come on when she sees things differently. You'll
> either make changes or part company.

There's no mountains of money, but it's sufficient that we don't consult
each other before spending on our respective wants.

Tim Fairchild

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 6:52:48 PM1/16/07
to
DFS wrote:

What's the divorce rate like in the US these days? It certainly is a
changing world and a lot of couples just live their separate lives and
don't really stick together for any great length of time.

But there are still a few out there who actually do want to spend time (and
everything) together :)

Tim Fairchild

unread,
Jan 16, 2007, 7:01:37 PM1/16/07
to
Tim Fairchild wrote:

And I should add that we wanted a family. And not the sort where both
parents have a career and the children are raised by daycare and other
people and end up being some strangers that happen to be related. So rather
than living in a situation where all time is spent making lots of money, we
chose to live on a lower scale and enjoy the time with the kids when they
were younger. It's a period of 25 years that goes very quickly, so better
not to waste it.

So my wife chose to stay home with the kids, and I get to spend a lot of
time with them as well. You can't buy that for any money...

Maverick

unread,
Jan 18, 2007, 9:33:40 PM1/18/07
to

Oh, I'm a man, but obviously you are just a bitch, eh??
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!!!

Maverick

unread,
Jan 18, 2007, 9:35:01 PM1/18/07
to
Sandman wrote:
> In article <X9qdnew785s_uzDY...@bresnan.com>,
> Maverick <S...@mustang.org> wrote:
>
>
>>>Haha, the "He can't be married, he's spending too much money" line? :)
>>>
>>>I spend lots of money as well, and I'm also married. Go figure. :)
>>
>>Spend too much and you'll find out the hard way.
>
>
> Find out what the hard way?

Divorce.

>
>
>>I've seen this problem all too often. I know of one guy that divorced
>>his wife because she couldn't control her spending. Getting over
>>$50,000 in credit card debt while he's retired isn't a good position to
>>get into.
>
>
> We don't have that problem since we don't need, or use, credit.
>

Suit yourself, but some women can't control their spending habits.
And some men abuse their wives and spend like their is no tomorrow...
known as wife beaters.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 18, 2007, 9:38:24 PM1/18/07
to
DFS wrote:
> Maverick wrote:
>
>
>>Nah... you are definitely not married. Most women today won't
>>tolerate that kind of abuse.
>
>
> What abuse are you talking about?

Where you don't give a rats ass about how deep in debt you go for your
own ends and the hell with the wife... that abuse.

>
> You're a freakin' retired old fossil. You don't know anything about
> "today's" women.

Yeah, I've seen basement masturbators like you get married, which I
doubt that you are, that only ends up abusing their wife.
You don't know anything about todays women, boy. You just wished you
could get to know them.
If you even tried to abuse todays modern woman, she'd kick your little
nuts off.
Then she'd go and find a real man.

>
> My guess is your wife literally tells you when to get up, what to wear, what
> to eat, when to go to bed, what to watch on TV, how fast you can drive, what
> you can or can't buy...
>
> Sounds to me like your spirit is broken, and you're resigned to your wife
> controlling your entire life. Why?
>

I see that you still spend far too much time in your basement, boy. You
are now just hallucinating.
Keep away from the glue.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 18, 2007, 9:39:41 PM1/18/07
to
Tim Fairchild wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>
>>Maverick wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Nah... you are definitely not married. Most women today won't
>>>tolerate that kind of abuse.
>>
>>What abuse are you talking about?
>>
>>You're a freakin' retired old fossil. You don't know anything about
>>"today's" women.
>>
>>My guess is your wife literally tells you when to get up, what to wear,
>>what to eat, when to go to bed, what to watch on TV, how fast you can
>>drive, what you can or can't buy...
>>
>>Sounds to me like your spirit is broken, and you're resigned to your wife
>>controlling your entire life. Why?
>
>
> What's the divorce rate like in the US these days?

It is pretty high. The reason is people like dfs still acting like an
old redneck towards women.
It is the reason for most divorces.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 18, 2007, 9:40:37 PM1/18/07
to
DFS wrote:
> Maverick wrote:
>
>
>>It is easy to tell by his arguments that he isn't married. Only a
>>fool would blow money willy-nilly with his wife watching... and then
>>he'll stand by watching his wife file for a divorce.
>
>
> ffs, quit bleating about your wife controlling your every move. It's
> pathetic. You're whipped, and from various comments you've made, nearly
> broke. I'm neither.
>

Guffaw!!! Keep yammering, bitch.
Pretty soon the right lesbian will come along and you'll both get a
motel room

Maverick

unread,
Jan 18, 2007, 9:41:47 PM1/18/07
to

So? An old car that runs doesn't need to be replaced till it becomes
uneconomical to fix.

>
>
>
>
>>>Of course I don't do
>>>that. But even if I did blow it, say on gambling or drugs, it's my
>>>money - not hers - and I'll do what I want with it. She has plenty
>>>of her own - she doesn't feel the need to control mine like your
>>>master obviously does.
>>
>>Fine if you have a mountain of money between you. But when it is
>>gone, watch the change come on when she sees things differently. You'll
>>either make changes or part company.
>
>
> There's no mountains of money, but it's sufficient that we don't consult
> each other before spending on our respective wants.
>

They you don't respect each other then.

B'ichela

unread,
Jan 19, 2007, 6:59:13 AM1/19/07
to
In article <hqOdnTdvTeZXti3Y...@bresnan.com>, Maverick wrote:
> Suit yourself, but some women can't control their spending habits.
> And some men abuse their wives and spend like their is no tomorrow...
> known as wife beaters.
>
I have seen the opposite as well. Some men with plastic go
nuts on a shopping spree. and yes, some of us women ARE men beaters
}}};)

--

From the Desk of the Sysop of:
Planet Maca's Opus, a Free open BBS system. telnet://pinkrose.dhis.org
Web Site: http://pinkrose.dhis.org, Dialup 860-618-3091 300-33600 bps
The New Cnews maintainer
B'ichela

Sandman

unread,
Jan 19, 2007, 7:33:25 AM1/19/07
to
In article <hqOdnTdvTeZXti3Y...@bresnan.com>,
Maverick <ho...@range.org> wrote:

> >>>Haha, the "He can't be married, he's spending too much money" line? :)
> >>>
> >>>I spend lots of money as well, and I'm also married. Go figure. :)
> >>
> >>Spend too much and you'll find out the hard way.
> >
> > Find out what the hard way?
>
> Divorce.

Haha! You've had women *divorce* you if you spend your money? That's
funny :-D

> >>I've seen this problem all too often. I know of one guy that divorced
> >>his wife because she couldn't control her spending. Getting over
> >>$50,000 in credit card debt while he's retired isn't a good position to
> >>get into.
> >
> > We don't have that problem since we don't need, or use, credit.
>
> Suit yourself, but some women can't control their spending habits.

I'm not married to "some women". I'm married to my wife.

> And some men abuse their wives and spend like their is no tomorrow...
> known as wife beaters.

Eh? Whatever that has to do with anyting...

--
Sandman[.net]

Maverick

unread,
Jan 19, 2007, 6:23:08 PM1/19/07
to
Sandman wrote:
> In article <hqOdnTdvTeZXti3Y...@bresnan.com>,
> Maverick <ho...@range.org> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>Haha, the "He can't be married, he's spending too much money" line? :)
>>>>>
>>>>>I spend lots of money as well, and I'm also married. Go figure. :)
>>>>
>>>>Spend too much and you'll find out the hard way.
>>>
>>>Find out what the hard way?
>>
>>Divorce.
>
>
> Haha! You've had women *divorce* you if you spend your money? That's
> funny :-D
>

It seems that sandcrab here can't read and tries to twist things ... eh?

>
>>>>I've seen this problem all too often. I know of one guy that divorced
>>>>his wife because she couldn't control her spending. Getting over
>>>>$50,000 in credit card debt while he's retired isn't a good position to
>>>>get into.
>>>
>>>We don't have that problem since we don't need, or use, credit.
>>
>>Suit yourself, but some women can't control their spending habits.
>
>
> I'm not married to "some women". I'm married to my wife.
>

No kidding. Is your wife a she?

>
>>And some men abuse their wives and spend like their is no tomorrow...
>>known as wife beaters.
>
>
> Eh? Whatever that has to do with anyting...
>

Ask DFS about beating his wife.

Sandman

unread,
Jan 20, 2007, 3:09:44 AM1/20/07
to
In article <X6-dnZ8A--7PzSzY...@bresnan.com>,
Maverick <ho...@range.org> wrote:

> >>Divorce.
> >
> > Haha! You've had women *divorce* you if you spend your money? That's
> > funny :-D
>
> It seems that sandcrab here can't read and tries to twist things ... eh?

So it hasn't happened to you? If it hasn't, then how do you know it
will happen?

> > I'm not married to "some women". I'm married to my wife.
>
> No kidding. Is your wife a she?

Yeah?

> >>And some men abuse their wives and spend like their is no tomorrow...
> >>known as wife beaters.
> >
> > Eh? Whatever that has to do with anyting...
>
> Ask DFS about beating his wife.

Why?


--
Sandman[.net]

Maverick

unread,
Jan 20, 2007, 4:23:41 PM1/20/07
to
Sandman wrote:
> In article <X6-dnZ8A--7PzSzY...@bresnan.com>,
> Maverick <ho...@range.org> wrote:
>
>
>>>>Divorce.
>>>
>>>Haha! You've had women *divorce* you if you spend your money? That's
>>>funny :-D
>>
>>It seems that sandcrab here can't read and tries to twist things ... eh?
>
>
> So it hasn't happened to you? If it hasn't, then how do you know it
> will happen?

I knew lots of crude, rude, dudes that treated their wives miserably.
Sooner or later divorce ensues. When there is domestic violence
involved, then divorce is usually inevitable.
My daughter is a domestic violence advocate, so she should know.

>
>
>>>I'm not married to "some women". I'm married to my wife.
>>
>>No kidding. Is your wife a she?
>
>
> Yeah?
>

Guffaw!

>
>>>>And some men abuse their wives and spend like their is no tomorrow...
>>>>known as wife beaters.
>>>
>>>Eh? Whatever that has to do with anyting...
>>
>>Ask DFS about beating his wife.
>
>
> Why?
>

So you'll be better educated about the problem. Apparently, he fits in
with the good ol' boys club of rednecks.

Sandman

unread,
Jan 21, 2007, 5:33:31 AM1/21/07
to
In article <t8SdndKQFb1KGC_Y...@bresnan.com>,
Maverick <ho...@range.org> wrote:

> > So it hasn't happened to you? If it hasn't, then how do you know it
> > will happen?
>
> I knew lots of crude, rude, dudes that treated their wives miserably.

Whatever that has to do with me...?

<snip rest of trolling>

--
Sandman[.net]

Maverick

unread,
Jan 21, 2007, 3:17:59 PM1/21/07
to
Sandman wrote:

> In article <t8SdndKQFb1KGC_Y...@bresnan.com>,
> Maverick <ho...@range.org> wrote:
>
>
>>>So it hasn't happened to you? If it hasn't, then how do you know it
>>>will happen?
>>
>>I knew lots of crude, rude, dudes that treated their wives miserably.
>
>
> Whatever that has to do with me...?

It is not about you, now is it.

>
> <snip rest of trolling>

You should talk.

Maverick

unread,
Jan 21, 2007, 3:18:52 PM1/21/07
to
B'ichela wrote:

> In article <hqOdnTdvTeZXti3Y...@bresnan.com>, Maverick wrote:
>
>>Suit yourself, but some women can't control their spending habits.
>>And some men abuse their wives and spend like their is no tomorrow...
>>known as wife beaters.
>>
>
> I have seen the opposite as well. Some men with plastic go
> nuts on a shopping spree. and yes, some of us women ARE men beaters
> }}};)
>

I'd believe that. DFS has already established where he is at. Poor woman.

0 new messages