Generate a directory of over 10,000 files and directories. In my case,
I used winrar to untar/gunzip an old backup from one of my freebsd
machines, totalling about 2.5 gigs with about 177,000 files and
directories.
Then, take that folder that you just made, and drag it to the recycle
bin.
Watch Vista choke on it somewhere around 4-8,000 files recycled.
Go have some lunch and coffee and come back 30 minutes later, notcing
that it's choking in exactly the same spot, and that the window has
become unresponsive.
So right click on the window and close it, confirming the close in
the subsequent dialog box. Watch explorer itself suddenly quit and
never come back.
Call your engineer buddy over at Cogent, who knows more about networks
and operating systems than any windows fuckhead on COLA and laugh at
microsoft for about ten minutes, trading Vista horror stories.
-----yttrx
Lies. I tried this with a directory with just shy of 50,000 files in it,
no problem here at all.
Was it 2.5 gigs? Was it files AND directories? Was it 177,000?
Fucking windows moronic shithead.
-----yttrx
There must be something wrong with your install.
I just tried this with 32,000 files and everything worked perfectly.
Possibly you have a corrupted install of Vista or bad memory?
Have you tried running memtest on the system?
Like I said, it works fine here.
Maybe someone from Microsoft can verify the bug and offer a solution?
t-rex always exaggerates. His tatts, his watch, his salary, his
skillz. He reminds of scrappy-doo a bit.
You are more than welcome to come visit and see for yourself, as always,
hadrin fuckhead.
But you won't because your lies would be exposed if you did. You
can't handle that, so you just type and type and type...from the
relative saftey of your comparative geography.
You're a spineless pussy, hadrin. And you're fucking retarded because
you can't figure out GIMP. Seriously, thats got to be the funniest
fucking thing ive read in months.
-----yttrx
It took them 6 years to fix a notorious Windows 95 bug. The bug led to
freezing of the O/S that could last a quarter of an hour. It happened when
you deleted a large number of files, so one wonders if there's a connection.
it'a classic example of Microsoft ignoring bug report and procrastinating
the handling of urgent requests.
--
~~ Happy Birthday, George W. (not Bush)
Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: 12345679 x 8 = 98765432
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects Åš PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 131 total, 3 running, 125 sleeping, 0 stopped, 3 zombie
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
Follow your case?
How is that possible?
You are vague and not specific enough. For example:
"Generate a directory of over 10,000 files and directories"
Over?
"with about 177,000 files"
About?
FWIW I used MORE files than you did, and it worked perfectly.
If you want people to "follow your case", as you put it, then please
do try and be specific
and tell us EXACTLY how many files and directories.
Personally, I think you are FOS but that's just my opinion.
JW
Which has exactly what to do with this person's claim?
Has he reported this supposed bug to Microsoft?
I don't see any similar complaints although it might me too early for
that.
It seems to work fine for others so that makes either him or his
methods suspect.
I think he is either doing something wrong, has a dodgey install, bad
hardware or is just another quack quack Linux user making false
claims.
But that's just my opinion of course.
JW
Certainly the key characteristic from that context is "Generate a directory
of over 10,000 files and directories". Your case is seemingly offered as a
comment rather than as a criterion. Who else would have access to your "old
backup" in any event? You need to re-state the test conditions so that it
is reproducible. There may be other conditions that contribute to the
defect, i.e. how much memory is on the system? Are any other applications
running at the same time?
Nah, you just need to add more RAM.
--
I believe the technical term is "Oops!"
DID YOU FUCKING USE MY METHOD? NO YOU FUCKING DIDNT, ASSHOLE.
And no, I didn't file a bug report. And I never will.
-----yttrx
I tried your "method" and VISTA did not crash. You must have a pirated
copy of VISTA.
OK SO YOUR PIRATED VISTA CRASHES. Buy a real copy.
No, you didn't. Where did you get 2.5 gigs of little files?
And, I never said that Vista crashed, you stupid fuck.
No need to get vulgar.
You appear to have a serious mental problem.
Seek help before you decide to shave your head like what's her name.
JW
P.S. Why is it that when Linux zealots get called on their claims they
go ballistic?
I have a real copy, bonehead.
Besides, I thought ballmer and gates said it was impossible to pirate?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAA
FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU.
BTW, I am not a linux zealot.
-----yttrx
You seem to be no stranger to pirated copies of software yttrx.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e4ed68fec1c133f7?hl=en&
Maybe that is why you have so many problems and refuse to call
technical support and file bug reports?
Oh, the possibilities.
[1] Available RAM.
[2] Memtest. (You'd be surprised what states Nexuiz gets
into with bad RAM. :-) )
[3] Video card drivers. (This might be classified as
a latent bug; basically, if the file handler splots too
many icons -- presumably squares with an image texture --
into the DirectX10 buffer or some such, it might overload
the GPU's available RAM and confuse the system. This is
of course only a guess.)
[4] A bug in the trash handling which precludes file
pathnames such as A/B/duh and A/C/duh coexisting thereinto.
In other words, the usual latent dumbness. ;-)
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #992398129:
void f(unsigned u) { if(u < 0) ... }
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> NEXT!
Frankly, he's right, yttrx. Why not be detailed as to what "your case"
really is?
--
JDS | jef...@go.away.com
| http://www.newtnotes.com
DJMBS | http://newtnotes.com/doctor-jeff-master-brainsurgeon/
I just followed his scenario exactly as he wrote it and I have no IE
crashes.
The small files are undo files that Premier uses for my video editing,
if it matters.
I would think his Vista install is somehow corrupt which is not unusal
especially if he upgraded over XP.
And how exactly does the post you just referenced make me seem to be
no stranger to pirated copies of software? Every last thing that I
run on every computer that I have control over, both in my apartment
and at my company, is legitimately licensed and not pirated.
That does NOT mean that it's all "paid for". For further detail,
write "business partner" on a brick and bash yourself in the face
with it until you understand.
-----yttrx
Erm...I did. Did you read the first post at all?
-----yttrx
I SAID FUCKING FILES AND DIRECTORIES, YOU GODDAMN MORON! FILES AND
DIRECTORIES! FROM A FUCKING FREEBSD BACKUP! ZILLIONS OF THEM! AND
2.5 GIGS WORTH!
You have computer problems because you are an idiot.
twenty or thirty gigs might be enough
>Oh, the possibilities.
>[1] Available RAM.
riiiiiiight. That must be where the file system routines were slipped into
the GDI code.
I think EVERYONE, know's your an idiot.
Or at least, that's how you come across here.
Heh. No, AFAICT it's more of an issue of not being
intelligent about presentation when there's more files
than the display can handle.
Then again, I frankly don't know (I did mark this as a
guess) and have seen something like this in a Linux TRON
game if one plays sufficiently long then rotates the display
just right. :-) I think in the latter case the X display
takes a dive, but would have to retry it.
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #8830129:
std::set<...> v; for(..:iterator i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); i++)
if(*i == thing) {...}
Did you leave out the part where you pretended it crashed?
There are politics to suport here, come on git with the program :)
Rich
Alright you stupid fucks.
1. I never said IE crashed. I said EXPLORER CRASHED. YOU DO UNDERSTAND
THAT THERES A MODICUM OF DIFFERENCE DO YOU NOT?
Fucking windiots.
2. fuck you.
-----yttrx
You can never have to much much RAM
He's smarter than you, though :-P, especially when it
comes to punctuation.
> Or at least, that's how you come across here.
>
yttrx comes across here as brusque, slightly vulgar,
intelligent enough to hold his own, and a non-Linux user
(but not a Winvocate; he's from BSDLand(tm), which isn't
bad on supported hardware but I've not played with it much
so don't know its precise capabilities).
Contrast that to someone like wjbell or DFS; both seem to
be so high on Windows that he thinks it'll solve everyone's
problems (including the pending nuclear crisis with Iran),
though DFS tends not to mouth the official line quite so
much. :-)
(Disclaimer: IMHO.)
And then there's Erik. Frankly, I'm not sure what to make
of him. Flatfish is an audiophile who likes high-end audio
cards (which, for some staggeringly imponderable reason,
don't seem to have Linux drivers in most cases).
KM is probably lurking out there, watching all this and
laughing his [censored] off.
And the rest...all here on COLA's newsgroup isle.....
:-)
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net -- insert random coconut-based device here
/dev/signature: Not a text file
When you use Vista, you can never have *enough* RAM.
--
VISTA: Virtually Incapable of Supporting The Applications
>>>
>>> You have no idea who the fuck you're talking to, bitch.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----yttrx
>>>
>>
>> I think EVERYONE, know's your an idiot.
>>
>
> He's smarter than you, though :-P, especially when it
> comes to punctuation.
The punctuation was intentional.
And repetative statements such as....
"DID YOU FUCKING USE MY METHOD? NO YOU FUCKING DIDNT, ASSHOLE.
And no, I didn't file a bug report. And I never will."
"No, you didn't. Where did you get 2.5 gigs of little files?
And, I never said that Vista crashed, you stupid fuck.
NEXT!"
"Alright you stupid fucks.
1. I never said IE crashed. I said EXPLORER CRASHED. YOU DO UNDERSTAND
THAT THERES A MODICUM OF DIFFERENCE DO YOU NOT?
Fucking windiots.
2. fuck you."
...really show me a high level of intelligence ?
Well, in all fairness, you're only seeing a very tiny cross
section of my behavior and input. I happen to have various and sundry
interests, port wine collecting (I only have one bottle of taylor
fladgate vintage 1994, which is one of the best ports I've ever
had...sadly. I'll probably open it before the end of this year)
to inferno-based grid/cluster solutions (plan 9 derivative, itself
the only real competition of quality that unix ever had).
I also very much enjoy theocidical debate, mechanical logic-gates
and Bach's Fugues, my favorite of which is the somewhat undersung,
so to speak, Little Fugue in G Minor.
Computer wise, for functionality on a desktop I prefer FreeBSD or
NetBSD (where 3D accelleration doesn't matter). Linux is sort of
alright for a lot of applications, but if I'm going to run something
*like* unix, I'd rather just run unix.
Windows Vista is on one of my work laptops, XP on the other. My
personal laptop runs XP and FreeBSD, but much more often FreeBSD
these days.
I love the BSDs, I despise windows (but I do need it for a few
things), and linux I guess is sort of alright, I suppose. It
would be better if it weren't for all it's idiot users.
But I guess the same thing could be said about windows, eh?
So fuck you.
-----yttrx
I love it when the LINUX Advocate Geeks start trying to enumerate how
cultured they are, as though they are writing a Shell Script.
We're not at all interested in what you said. We're interested in
what we said you said. Plus we like to get you do do a bunch of free
typing, and we love it when you cuss.
Is there? IE4 replaced a boatload of DLLs in the system area... :-)
I've no data suggesting they've been separated since.
>
> 2. fuck you.
>
>
>
>
> -----yttrx
>
>
>
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
GNU and improved.
> > > There must be something wrong with your install.
> > > I just tried this with 32,000 files and everything worked perfectly.
> >
[snip]
>
> "with about 177,000 files"
>
> About?
>
> FWIW I used MORE files than you did, and it worked perfectly.
Only on a Windows system is 32,000 > 177,000
I guess this is why MS wins all the benchmark tests.
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Parity on, dudes!
Did you not read any of what I wrote? I DON'T EVEN USE LINUX THESE
DAYS. I'm not a linux advocate, you stupid fuck.
-----yttrx
Nah, I'm talking about the windows "shell".
-----yttrx
Don't be too hard on yt, he doesn't seem to know the difference between
shitty hardware and shitty OS's.
--
wjbell
Peter K abandon his firewall lie:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e6eaf7e09552e5e2?hl=en
Jim R failing to address the issue after being asked:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ad37ca14a2d7224?hl=en
And of course, Roy Culley -- COLAs loyal hall monitor:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=cola+stats&hl=en&as_uauthors=roy+culley
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/578bb2221ad0453c?hl=en
Yeah, he's a real sfmart feller *eye roll*
Who gives a shit?
If we wanted your myspace bio we would have asked for it.
> -----yttrx
I don't care if you're my twin. If you're acting like a jerk I am going to
tell you. The fact that you can't complete a sentence without vulgarity only
confirms our belief that you are uneducated and cannot express yourself with
intelligence. At least when K-Man uses vulgarity he does it with style and
class. You sir are no K-Man. I seriously doubt anyone on this list wants to
know who you are. Enjoy your weekend.
SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU BITCH HOLE DICKSHIT FUCKHEAD!
Who the hell is K-Man? I'm not ON your "list" (I think you might mean
newsgroup, dickfor) in the first place.
-----yttrx
Don't pay attention to billy. He lives with his mum and has dorito crumbs
in his underpants.
-----yttrx
Forgive yt, his wittiest remarks consist of living with mom jokes from 1997.
[snippage]
>>> Don't pay attention to billy. He lives with his mum and has
>>> dorito crumbs in his underpants.
>>>
>>
>> Forgive yt, his wittiest remarks consist of living with mom jokes from 1997.
>>
>
> Ignore billy, he thinks that computers were invented in 1997.
>
Interesting notion. What did Win95 run on, then? :-)
>
>
>
> -----yttrx
>
>
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Windows Vista. Because a BSOD is just so 20th century; why not
try our new color changing variant?
More like a shell game at this point. :-) I think that
was also replaced.
I'll have to find and dig out my IE4 installation and see
if I can figure out exactly what was replaced. (With my
luck it's on my dead Win95 drive.)
>
>
>
> -----yttrx
>
>
>
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Windows Vista. Because a BSOD is just so 20th century; why not
try our new color changing variant?
--
Are you on heavy drugs?
> You leave t-rex alone. He just took half an aspirin.
BWAHA! It was crushed up in a little teaspoon of Coca-cola, and fed to him
by Grammy. awwww
Ah yes, the DFS/Hadrin Quack circle-jerk. Try to keep it to yourselves,
guys.
-----yttrx