Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Ahlstrom donates to Dietrich's hobby blog
11 views
Skip to first unread message
Snit
May 15, 2013, 11:05:03 AM5/15/13
to
It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
<http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at least
some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
He never will.
--
Proof Mark Bilk's http://cosmicpenguin.com/911/ is nothing but silly
fiction: <http://bit.ly/Y741mf>.
Using Bilk's own "logic" he posts his lies because the Underground
Marshmallow People pay him to.
<http://bit.ly/19aDAxL>
"Maybe I am that way because people kept telling me I was mentally ill. But
I never was. I just saw monsters. Them." - Mark S. Bilk
<http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at least
some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
He never will.
--
Proof Mark Bilk's http://cosmicpenguin.com/911/ is nothing but silly
fiction: <http://bit.ly/Y741mf>.
Using Bilk's own "logic" he posts his lies because the Underground
Marshmallow People pay him to.
<http://bit.ly/19aDAxL>
"Maybe I am that way because people kept telling me I was mentally ill. But
I never was. I just saw monsters. Them." - Mark S. Bilk
flatfish+++
May 15, 2013, 11:08:36 AM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:05:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>
> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at least
> some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>
> He never will.
How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>
> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at least
> some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>
> He never will.
I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and
legitimate places that could use the donation.
The OLPC program for one.
--
flatfish+++
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Cola Zealot
May 15, 2013, 11:20:54 AM5/15/13
to
Snit wrote:
> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
Well not bad, he gave 5 times his weekly allowance of $20.
> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
lol Maybe the creepster sold his Ford Fiesta crapbox for Dietrich and
LIEnux?
>
> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed
> at least some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be
> thanking me.
>
> He never will.
Snit
May 15, 2013, 11:25:00 AM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/13 8:20 AM, in article kn091n$s3q$1...@news.albasani.net, "Cola Zealot"
No, but he is scamming a number of people. As I have said, their choice...
But I wonder, when he does not get 1/10th his amount which is "a matter of
survival", what is going to happen to him?
But I wonder, when he does not get 1/10th his amount which is "a matter of
survival", what is going to happen to him?
Snit
May 15, 2013, 11:25:41 AM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/13 8:08 AM, in article bcvtw6py9603.13...@40tude.net,
"flatfish+++" <phlat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:05:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at least
>> some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>>
>> He never will.
>
> How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
>
> I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
>
> If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and
> legitimate places that could use the donation.
>
> The OLPC program for one.
Absolutely. Dietrich is a scam artist and they are falling for his scam.
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:05:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at least
>> some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>>
>> He never will.
>
> How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
>
> I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
>
> If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and
> legitimate places that could use the donation.
>
> The OLPC program for one.
flatfish+++
May 15, 2013, 11:34:38 AM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 17:20:54 +0200, Cola Zealot wrote:
> Snit wrote:
>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>
> Well not bad, he gave 5 times his weekly allowance of $20.
> lol Maybe the creepster sold his Ford Fiesta crapbox for Dietrich and
> LIEnux?
Given the choice between the Ford Fiesta and donating to Dietrich I
> Snit wrote:
>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>
> Well not bad, he gave 5 times his weekly allowance of $20.
> lol Maybe the creepster sold his Ford Fiesta crapbox for Dietrich and
> LIEnux?
think I would donate to Dietrich long before I was seen driving a
Ford Fiesta.
>>
>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed
>> at least some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be
>> thanking me.
>>
>> He never will.
>
> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
gullible, so who knows :)
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
P.S. I wonder if Chris Ahlstrom's wife knows he donated?
Marti Van Lin
May 15, 2013, 12:40:53 PM5/15/13
to
Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
> Snit wrote:
>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
[snip personal attack]
>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed
>> at least some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be
>> thanking me.
Oh Dear, SNOT selfsucking as usual. You can't get enough of your own
cum, can't you girly boy?
>> He never will.
>
> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
Who cares?
--
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin (alias de ML2MST)
|_|_|0| http://osg33x.blogspot.com
|0|0|0| Windows 8: The Future is Now!
> Snit wrote:
>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
[snip personal attack]
>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed
>> at least some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be
>> thanking me.
cum, can't you girly boy?
>> He never will.
>
> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
--
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin (alias de ML2MST)
|_|_|0| http://osg33x.blogspot.com
|0|0|0| Windows 8: The Future is Now!
Snit
May 15, 2013, 12:52:32 PM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/13 9:40 AM, in article kn0dqm$7dt$1...@news.albasani.net, "Marti Van
snipped it is dishonest. You just lied.
>>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed
>>> at least some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be
>>> thanking me.
>
> Oh Dear, SNOT selfsucking as usual. You can't get enough of your own
> cum, can't you girly boy?
>>> He never will.
>>
>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>
> Who cares?
You need to learn self control - as you have noted, you know you are the one
in the wrong with your name calling and the like:
Marti van Lin:
-----
Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa (What have I done).
Yesterday +Dietrich Schmitz reinvited me to G+ Linux Advocate and
because I was at birthday party. It took me some time to respond and
I had the idea there was something he wanted to show me (just a
guess).
In the "I Invited Chris Ahlstrom" treat where a few new comments.
Unfortunately it looks more like a typical COLA battlefield then a
Linux Advocacy discussion.
So I added this to the treat.
[quote]
Common guys, let's stop this. We where looking for a Troll-Free
Linux Advocacy group and now we are ruining it our selves. I suggest
we should leave because we are harming this group more then we
contribute. We are muddying up this group with our bad Karma from
COLA. This is unhealthy and unpleasant.
My sincere apologies for the damage I've done. This group doesn't
deserve this.
[/quote]
I think we should ether stop harping on Snit, just ignore him, or
just leave.
Snit has us right where he wants us, this threat has already become
a mini COLA cesspool.
We should take action, we owe it to +Dietrich Schmitz and our Fellow
Linux Advocates in that group, who didn't suffer the years of
psychological torture from the Anti-Linux Trolls.
-----
+Homer Slated Well you didn't go on a rampage and blocked someone
from someone else's forum. You did the right thing and started your
own.
I got on a rampage and made a mess, now I have to clean it up.
I neither belong in that forum, the scars from years of Troll
torturing are so deep, I take them every where with me.
In this community this bad experience is known. That doesn't mean I
have to muddy the water somewhere else.
------
Lin" <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote:
> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>
> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>
> [snip personal attack]
No, you did not snip your personal attack - you left it in. To claim you
> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>
> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>
> [snip personal attack]
snipped it is dishonest. You just lied.
>>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed
>>> at least some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be
>>> thanking me.
>
> Oh Dear, SNOT selfsucking as usual. You can't get enough of your own
> cum, can't you girly boy?
>>> He never will.
>>
>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>
> Who cares?
in the wrong with your name calling and the like:
Marti van Lin:
-----
Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa (What have I done).
Yesterday +Dietrich Schmitz reinvited me to G+ Linux Advocate and
because I was at birthday party. It took me some time to respond and
I had the idea there was something he wanted to show me (just a
guess).
In the "I Invited Chris Ahlstrom" treat where a few new comments.
Unfortunately it looks more like a typical COLA battlefield then a
Linux Advocacy discussion.
So I added this to the treat.
[quote]
Common guys, let's stop this. We where looking for a Troll-Free
Linux Advocacy group and now we are ruining it our selves. I suggest
we should leave because we are harming this group more then we
contribute. We are muddying up this group with our bad Karma from
COLA. This is unhealthy and unpleasant.
My sincere apologies for the damage I've done. This group doesn't
deserve this.
[/quote]
I think we should ether stop harping on Snit, just ignore him, or
just leave.
Snit has us right where he wants us, this threat has already become
a mini COLA cesspool.
We should take action, we owe it to +Dietrich Schmitz and our Fellow
Linux Advocates in that group, who didn't suffer the years of
psychological torture from the Anti-Linux Trolls.
-----
+Homer Slated Well you didn't go on a rampage and blocked someone
from someone else's forum. You did the right thing and started your
own.
I got on a rampage and made a mess, now I have to clean it up.
I neither belong in that forum, the scars from years of Troll
torturing are so deep, I take them every where with me.
In this community this bad experience is known. That doesn't mean I
have to muddy the water somewhere else.
------
Chris Ahlstrom
May 15, 2013, 12:54:28 PM5/15/13
to
After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>
> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>
> [snip personal attack]
>
how low he's willing to go.
--
Judge Sporkin was troubled by a Microsoft internal memorandum that said: "The
best way to stick it to Philippe is preannounce ... to hold off Turbo buyers."
Arguably, the memorandum shows Microsoft's specific intent to hinder Borland's
marketing by a preannouncement. Should that be illegal? Reasoning from
securities fraud principles, Judge Sporkin said yes.
-- http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/claw/Vaporware.htm
IEEE Micro 0272-1732/95/$04.00 © 1995 IEEE
Volume , 15 Number 2; April 1995, pp. 6-7
Micro Law
Microsoft and vaporware
Richard H. Stern
2000 M Street NW, Suite 7000, Washington, DC 20036-3307
> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>
> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>
> [snip personal attack]
>
>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>
> Who cares?
They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
>
> Who cares?
how low he's willing to go.
--
Judge Sporkin was troubled by a Microsoft internal memorandum that said: "The
best way to stick it to Philippe is preannounce ... to hold off Turbo buyers."
Arguably, the memorandum shows Microsoft's specific intent to hinder Borland's
marketing by a preannouncement. Should that be illegal? Reasoning from
securities fraud principles, Judge Sporkin said yes.
-- http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/claw/Vaporware.htm
IEEE Micro 0272-1732/95/$04.00 © 1995 IEEE
Volume , 15 Number 2; April 1995, pp. 6-7
Micro Law
Microsoft and vaporware
Richard H. Stern
2000 M Street NW, Suite 7000, Washington, DC 20036-3307
Snit
May 15, 2013, 1:20:58 PM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/13 9:54 AM, in article kn0ecu$19q$1...@dont-email.me, "Chris Ahlstrom"
Care to look at your own behavior and the behavior of your herd buddies?
<OFee...@teleworm.us> wrote:
> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>
>> [snip personal attack]
>>
>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
> how low he's willing to go.
I noted you funded Dietrich's hobby site. That is "low" in your book?
> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>
>> [snip personal attack]
>>
>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
> how low he's willing to go.
Care to look at your own behavior and the behavior of your herd buddies?
flatfish+++
May 15, 2013, 2:13:18 PM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:54:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>
>> [snip personal attack]
>>
>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
> how low he's willing to go.
Then you should have no problem posting some examples.
> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>
>> [snip personal attack]
>>
>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
> how low he's willing to go.
Snit
May 15, 2013, 2:19:40 PM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/13 11:13 AM, in article 1jqm7t1wb2ym8.y...@40tude.net,
But he will not.
Ever.
This is completely predictable.
"flatfish+++" <phlat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:54:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>
>>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>>
>>> [snip personal attack]
>>>
>>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>>
>>> Who cares?
>>
>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
>> how low he's willing to go.
>
> Then you should have no problem posting some examples.
And I welcome him to do it.
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:54:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>
>>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>>
>>> [snip personal attack]
>>>
>>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>>
>>> Who cares?
>>
>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
>> how low he's willing to go.
>
> Then you should have no problem posting some examples.
But he will not.
Ever.
This is completely predictable.
Ezekiel
May 15, 2013, 2:59:36 PM5/15/13
to
"flatfish+++" <phlat...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bcvtw6py9603.13...@40tude.net...
send a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off
his ass and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's
either too stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at home
and begging for donations.
--
"It's not so much the threat of divorce, as making your every moment at home
a living hell. My wife used to dole out my weekly allowance, $20, and then
quiz me about where I spent it, as she didn't expect me to buy snacks and
such."
Chris Ahlstrom - emasculated wimp without a spine.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ecaf21d667b4afca?hl=en
news:bcvtw6py9603.13...@40tude.net...
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:05:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at
>> least
>> some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>>
>> He never will.
>
> How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
>
> I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
>
> If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and
> legitimate places that could use the donation.
>
> The OLPC program for one.
There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never
>
>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at
>> least
>> some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>>
>> He never will.
>
> How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
>
> I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
>
> If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and
> legitimate places that could use the donation.
>
> The OLPC program for one.
send a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off
his ass and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's
either too stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at home
and begging for donations.
--
"It's not so much the threat of divorce, as making your every moment at home
a living hell. My wife used to dole out my weekly allowance, $20, and then
quiz me about where I spent it, as she didn't expect me to buy snacks and
such."
Chris Ahlstrom - emasculated wimp without a spine.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ecaf21d667b4afca?hl=en
Snit
May 15, 2013, 3:33:21 PM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/13 11:59 AM, in article kn0lnd$eha$1...@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel"
Maybe he really needs charity to survive, as he says.
But he lies. He claims he needs this money to keep a WordPress hobby site
up. Utter BS. There are social services which can help him if he truly is in
need and if not, as you say, he can go find work or earn his money and not
beg for donations.
> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at home
> and begging for donations.
Exactly.
<ze...@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
> "flatfish+++" <phlat...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:bcvtw6py9603.13...@40tude.net...
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:05:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>
>>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at least
>>> some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>>>
>>> He never will.
>>>
>> How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
>>
>> I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
>>
>> If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and legitimate
>> places that could use the donation.
>>
>> The OLPC program for one.
>>
> There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never send
> a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off his ass
> and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's either too
> stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
Or disabled. Or whatever. Fine. Maybe he can find work and maybe he cannot.
> "flatfish+++" <phlat...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:bcvtw6py9603.13...@40tude.net...
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:05:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>
>>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at least
>>> some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>>>
>>> He never will.
>>>
>> How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
>>
>> I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
>>
>> If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and legitimate
>> places that could use the donation.
>>
>> The OLPC program for one.
>>
> There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never send
> a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off his ass
> and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's either too
> stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
Maybe he really needs charity to survive, as he says.
But he lies. He claims he needs this money to keep a WordPress hobby site
up. Utter BS. There are social services which can help him if he truly is in
need and if not, as you say, he can go find work or earn his money and not
beg for donations.
> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at home
> and begging for donations.
William Poaster
May 15, 2013, 5:57:15 PM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:54:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>
>> [snip personal attack]
>>
>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just how
> low he's willing to go.
And how much does Glasser contribute to his household?
>
>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>
>> [snip personal attack]
>>
>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just how
> low he's willing to go.
Oh, that's right. *Nothing*. And he's even admitted as much on one website.
Snit
May 15, 2013, 6:41:13 PM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/13 2:57 PM, in article
pan.2013.05.15....@induh-vidual.net, "William Poaster"
not stop you from lying to please the herd.
> Oh, that's right. *Nothing*. And he's even admitted as much on one website.
This is a direct lie on your part. But do not worry - your herd not only
tolerates your lying they encourage it and reward you for it.
pan.2013.05.15....@induh-vidual.net, "William Poaster"
<w...@induh-vidual.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:54:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>
>>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>>
>>> [snip personal attack]
>>>
>>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>>
>>> Who cares?
>>
>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just how
>> low he's willing to go.
>
> And how much does Glasser contribute to his household?
None of your business... and something you have no knowledge of - which will
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:54:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>
>>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>>
>>> [snip personal attack]
>>>
>>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>>
>>> Who cares?
>>
>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just how
>> low he's willing to go.
>
> And how much does Glasser contribute to his household?
not stop you from lying to please the herd.
> Oh, that's right. *Nothing*. And he's even admitted as much on one website.
tolerates your lying they encourage it and reward you for it.
Ezekiel
May 16, 2013, 7:45:01 AM5/16/13
to
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message
news:CDB93111.1AEEE%use...@gallopinginsanity.com...
There's never been any indication that Dietrich is disabled. If he was then
he'd be collecting some form/forms of disability which doesn't seem to be
the case.
> But he lies. He claims he needs this money to keep a WordPress hobby site
> up. Utter BS. There are social services which can help him if he truly is
> in
> need and if not, as you say, he can go find work or earn his money and not
> beg for donations.
How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
employers", etc, etc.
So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and instead
of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
instead?
>> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at
>> home
>> and begging for donations.
>
> Exactly.
>
--
> "The report found that the average salary for Linux professionals was
> $90,853 (�58,654). That's 6.2 per cent higher than the $85,619 (�55,274)
> average for tech professionals generally."
If the "average" is a little over $90k then how stupid is this person? This
person is evidently way, way, way below average in both skills and
intelligence.
<quote>
"I use Linux and open source tools for my every day job. Around $1100 per
week."
7-tard. Drooling over the burger-flipping salary he makes with Linux.
Sun, 22 Apr 2012
Message-ID: <G_Ykr.348244$xD4.2...@fx06.am4>
</quote>
news:CDB93111.1AEEE%use...@gallopinginsanity.com...
he'd be collecting some form/forms of disability which doesn't seem to be
the case.
> But he lies. He claims he needs this money to keep a WordPress hobby site
> up. Utter BS. There are social services which can help him if he truly is
> in
> need and if not, as you say, he can go find work or earn his money and not
> beg for donations.
jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
employers", etc, etc.
So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and instead
of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
instead?
>> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at
>> home
>> and begging for donations.
>
> Exactly.
>
--
> $90,853 (�58,654). That's 6.2 per cent higher than the $85,619 (�55,274)
> average for tech professionals generally."
If the "average" is a little over $90k then how stupid is this person? This
person is evidently way, way, way below average in both skills and
intelligence.
<quote>
"I use Linux and open source tools for my every day job. Around $1100 per
week."
7-tard. Drooling over the burger-flipping salary he makes with Linux.
Sun, 22 Apr 2012
Message-ID: <G_Ykr.348244$xD4.2...@fx06.am4>
</quote>
philo
May 16, 2013, 7:45:11 AM5/16/13
to
On 05/15/2013 01:59 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
>
> There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never
> send a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off
> his ass and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's
> either too stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
>
> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at home
> and begging for donations.
>
I actually took a look and the clown wants $10,000.
>
> There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never
> send a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off
> his ass and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's
> either too stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
>
> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at home
> and begging for donations.
>
My wife and I run two websites and it costs us less than $200 a year to
maintain them.
I find it hard to believe than anyone would be so utterly STOOPID as to
contribute...but of course, everyone knows what P.T. Barnum said.
To make myself clear: Anyone who contributed is anencepholic.
Ezekiel
May 16, 2013, 7:53:13 AM5/16/13
to
"philo " <philo@priv cy.not> wrote in message
news:kn2gkv$mk0$1...@dont-email.me...
domain registration itself is some small charge. Again.. far less than
$200/year.
Dietrich started this "linux advocates" site just a few months ago and this
is already the 2nd time that he's crying "I need $10k or I'll have to stop
the site and file for bankruptcy." I'm sure it won't be the last time
either.
> I find it hard to believe than anyone would be so utterly STOOPID as to
> contribute...but of course, everyone knows what P.T. Barnum said.
P.T. Barnum was right.
> To make myself clear: Anyone who contributed is anencepholic.
>
Last time he didn't even come close to reaching his target. And he
shouldn't... just because he has a hobby website with the word "Linux" in it
doesn't justify him not having to work and having people donate to pay his
way through life.
--
"I wouldn't work for Microsoft for a billion dollars."
Chris Ahlstrom and his high-horse strawman morality.
Message-ID: <jh60uj$22g$3...@dont-email.me>
news:kn2gkv$mk0$1...@dont-email.me...
> On 05/15/2013 01:59 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>> There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never
>> send a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off
>> his ass and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's
>> either too stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
>>
>> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at
>> home
>> and begging for donations.
>>
>
>
>
> I actually took a look and the clown wants $10,000.
>
> My wife and I run two websites and it costs us less than $200 a year to
> maintain them.
>
I own and run a doman... the web hosting is less than $8/month and the
>>
>> There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never
>> send a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off
>> his ass and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's
>> either too stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
>>
>> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at
>> home
>> and begging for donations.
>>
>
>
>
> I actually took a look and the clown wants $10,000.
>
> My wife and I run two websites and it costs us less than $200 a year to
> maintain them.
>
domain registration itself is some small charge. Again.. far less than
$200/year.
Dietrich started this "linux advocates" site just a few months ago and this
is already the 2nd time that he's crying "I need $10k or I'll have to stop
the site and file for bankruptcy." I'm sure it won't be the last time
either.
> I find it hard to believe than anyone would be so utterly STOOPID as to
> contribute...but of course, everyone knows what P.T. Barnum said.
> To make myself clear: Anyone who contributed is anencepholic.
>
shouldn't... just because he has a hobby website with the word "Linux" in it
doesn't justify him not having to work and having people donate to pay his
way through life.
--
"I wouldn't work for Microsoft for a billion dollars."
Chris Ahlstrom and his high-horse strawman morality.
Message-ID: <jh60uj$22g$3...@dont-email.me>
Ezekiel
May 16, 2013, 7:56:39 AM5/16/13
to
news:CDB95D19.1AF67%use...@gallopinginsanity.com...
the 2nd time how you need $10k in donations for your site your you'll go
broke?
--
"Microsoft Executives deposed in sworn testimony before Courts, in 2005, and
in *every* quarterly SEC filing, that Linux users made up over 17% of all
Internet users with a growth rate of >3% per annum."
Dumb Willy Poaster - repeating the same LIE for YEARS.
08 May 2008 <pan.2008.05.08....@leafnode.amd64.eu>
19 Jul 2009 <ibjbj6-...@jaunty64bit.unbuntulinux.org>
26 Jan 2010 <pan.2010.01.26....@mandriva2010.org>
> On 5/15/13 2:57 PM, in article
> pan.2013.05.15....@induh-vidual.net, "William Poaster"
> <w...@induh-vidual.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:54:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>>
>>>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>>>
>>>> [snip personal attack]
>>>>
>>>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>>>
>>>> Who cares?
>>>
>>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
>>> how
>>> low he's willing to go.
>>
>> And how much does Glasser contribute to his household?
>
> None of your business... and something you have no knowledge of - which
> will
> not stop you from lying to please the herd.
Did you create a website a handful of months ago and are you now crying for
> pan.2013.05.15....@induh-vidual.net, "William Poaster"
> <w...@induh-vidual.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:54:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>>
>>>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>>>
>>>> [snip personal attack]
>>>>
>>>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>>>
>>>> Who cares?
>>>
>>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
>>> how
>>> low he's willing to go.
>>
>> And how much does Glasser contribute to his household?
>
> None of your business... and something you have no knowledge of - which
> will
> not stop you from lying to please the herd.
the 2nd time how you need $10k in donations for your site your you'll go
broke?
--
"Microsoft Executives deposed in sworn testimony before Courts, in 2005, and
in *every* quarterly SEC filing, that Linux users made up over 17% of all
Internet users with a growth rate of >3% per annum."
Dumb Willy Poaster - repeating the same LIE for YEARS.
08 May 2008 <pan.2008.05.08....@leafnode.amd64.eu>
19 Jul 2009 <ibjbj6-...@jaunty64bit.unbuntulinux.org>
26 Jan 2010 <pan.2010.01.26....@mandriva2010.org>
White Spirit
May 16, 2013, 8:03:38 AM5/16/13
to
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:45:01 UTC+1, Ezekiel wrote:
> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
> employers", etc, etc.
If that's the case, I can't help wondering why so few people on this group work with Linux, and not one of them belongs to the false-advocate clique. They seem to parrot any generalisation and sound-bite if it fits in with their world-view.
> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
> employers", etc, etc.
Linux jobs tend to be more niche, which has advantages and disadvantages. There is more variety with Win32 and I'm not ashamed to admit that the development I did in my Windows job was much more interesting than what I am doing now.
> So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and instead
> of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
> elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
> hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
> instead?
flatfish+++
May 16, 2013, 8:53:06 AM5/16/13
to
But FOSSies HATE the evil government so maybe that's why he is
avoiding them.
lol!
>> But he lies. He claims he needs this money to keep a WordPress hobby site
>> up. Utter BS. There are social services which can help him if he truly is
>> in
>> need and if not, as you say, he can go find work or earn his money and not
>> beg for donations.
>
> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
> employers", etc, etc.
>
> So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and instead
> of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
> elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
> hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
> instead?
He needs to get off his ass and apply for one of those many Linux
jobs being created each day.
I can't believe people are foolish enough to contribute to that
loser's pizza and jolt habit.
flatfish+++
May 16, 2013, 8:54:22 AM5/16/13
to
Ezekiel
May 16, 2013, 10:17:31 AM5/16/13
to
"White Spirit" <wulfg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dc290828-5299-4de4...@googlegroups.com...
"comfortable" with what their job and it's safer then changing to another
job with another company.
> Linux jobs tend to be more niche, which has advantages and disadvantages.
> There is more variety with Win32 and I'm not ashamed to admit that the
> development I did in my Windows job was much more interesting than what
> I am doing now.
I don't have a "Linux job" although my desktop at work runs Linux natively
and we have dozens of Linux VMs that I telnet into. I work in the "big data"
sector of the software industry and our software runs on everything from
Windows Server to IBM mainframes and everything in between which includes
Linux, AIX, Solaris, HPUX and various other OSs that aren't so familiar to
people.
I don't specifically write "Linux software" but write software that's
expected to compile and run on all of the platforms that we support on
various processor architectures and file systems. It's not any specific
knowlege if Linux, Windows or Solaris that employs me but my understanding
of the issues and challenges facing customers with a data warehouse that has
100's or terabytes or even petabytes of data they need to access and mine.
Sure, I need to be proficient in C/C++/Python/shell-script programming but
it's being able to apply that to "big data" problems is what's more
important.
>> So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and
>> instead
>> of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
>> elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
>> hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
>> instead?
>
> That would be the sensible option.
A quick look on Monster.com, Dice or any other employment site would show
that there are plenty of jobs available for people of various skill levels.
There's no excuse to sit home and constantly ask for $10k in donations from
people because he doesn't have a job.
--
"This new (Apple) SIM is just another annoyance whose sole intention is
lockin."
Some idiot "advocate" who thinks a SIM card somehow locks people in.
13 Sep 2012
<WMo4s.356$601...@fe32.iad.newshosting.com>
news:dc290828-5299-4de4...@googlegroups.com...
> On Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:45:01 UTC+1, Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
>> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
>> employers", etc, etc.
>
> If that's the case, I can't help wondering why so few people on this group
> work with Linux, and not one of them belongs to the false-advocate clique.
> They seem to parrot any generalisation and sound-bite if it fits in with
> their
> world-view.
>
They'll have to answer that question themselves. Most likely they're
>
>> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
>> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
>> employers", etc, etc.
>
> If that's the case, I can't help wondering why so few people on this group
> work with Linux, and not one of them belongs to the false-advocate clique.
> They seem to parrot any generalisation and sound-bite if it fits in with
> their
> world-view.
>
"comfortable" with what their job and it's safer then changing to another
job with another company.
> Linux jobs tend to be more niche, which has advantages and disadvantages.
> There is more variety with Win32 and I'm not ashamed to admit that the
> development I did in my Windows job was much more interesting than what
> I am doing now.
and we have dozens of Linux VMs that I telnet into. I work in the "big data"
sector of the software industry and our software runs on everything from
Windows Server to IBM mainframes and everything in between which includes
Linux, AIX, Solaris, HPUX and various other OSs that aren't so familiar to
people.
I don't specifically write "Linux software" but write software that's
expected to compile and run on all of the platforms that we support on
various processor architectures and file systems. It's not any specific
knowlege if Linux, Windows or Solaris that employs me but my understanding
of the issues and challenges facing customers with a data warehouse that has
100's or terabytes or even petabytes of data they need to access and mine.
Sure, I need to be proficient in C/C++/Python/shell-script programming but
it's being able to apply that to "big data" problems is what's more
important.
>> So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and
>> instead
>> of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
>> elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
>> hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
>> instead?
>
> That would be the sensible option.
that there are plenty of jobs available for people of various skill levels.
There's no excuse to sit home and constantly ask for $10k in donations from
people because he doesn't have a job.
--
"This new (Apple) SIM is just another annoyance whose sole intention is
lockin."
Some idiot "advocate" who thinks a SIM card somehow locks people in.
13 Sep 2012
<WMo4s.356$601...@fe32.iad.newshosting.com>
Hadron
May 16, 2013, 11:51:09 AM5/16/13
to
--
A certain COLA "advocate" faking his user-agent in order to pretend to be a Linux
user: User-Agent: Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0), User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0
(Linux), Message-ID: <wPGdnd3NnOM...@comcast.com>
Hadron
May 16, 2013, 11:52:31 AM5/16/13
to
Chris Ahlstrom <OFee...@teleworm.us> writes:
> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>
>> [snip personal attack]
>>
>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
> how low he's willing to go.
Why did you cut the comments of the person you are sucking up to. These
> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>
>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>
>> [snip personal attack]
>>
>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
> how low he's willing to go.
are the words you support:
,----
| Oh Dear, SNOT selfsucking as usual. You can't get enough of your own cum, can't
| you girly boy?
`----
| you girly boy?
So Creepy, how LOW can you go?
My god you're a weenie.
Snit
May 16, 2013, 12:33:55 PM5/16/13
to
On 5/16/13 4:56 AM, in article kn2haa$q13$1...@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel"
WordPress site.
Insane.
But when this is noted, the herd makes up stories about my personal life -
stories they know to be false.
<ze...@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Who cares?
>>>>>
>>>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just how
>>>> low he's willing to go.
>>>>
>>> And how much does Glasser contribute to his household?
>>>
>> None of your business... and something you have no knowledge of - which will
>> not stop you from lying to please the herd.
>>
>
> Did you create a website a handful of months ago and are you now crying for
> the 2nd time how you need $10k in donations for your site your you'll go
> broke?
>
"literally a matter of survival"... to get people to pay him to run a hobby
>>>>> Who cares?
>>>>>
>>>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just how
>>>> low he's willing to go.
>>>>
>>> And how much does Glasser contribute to his household?
>>>
>> None of your business... and something you have no knowledge of - which will
>> not stop you from lying to please the herd.
>>
>
> Did you create a website a handful of months ago and are you now crying for
> the 2nd time how you need $10k in donations for your site your you'll go
> broke?
>
WordPress site.
Insane.
But when this is noted, the herd makes up stories about my personal life -
stories they know to be false.
Snit
May 16, 2013, 12:35:26 PM5/16/13
to
On 5/16/13 8:52 AM, in article wefvxm6...@news.eternal-september.org,
"Hadron" <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFee...@teleworm.us> writes:
>
>> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>
>>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>>
>>> [snip personal attack]
>>>
>>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>>
>>> Who cares?
>>
>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
>> how low he's willing to go.
>
> Why did you cut the comments of the person you are sucking up to. These
> are the words you support:
>
> ,----
> | Oh Dear, SNOT selfsucking as usual. You can't get enough of your own cum,
> can't
> | you girly boy?
> `----
>
> So Creepy, how LOW can you go?
>
> My god you're a weenie.
He is repulsive.
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFee...@teleworm.us> writes:
>
>> After swilling some grog, Marti Van Lin belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Op 15-5-2013 17:20, schreef Cola Zealot:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> It is "a matter of survival"... and Ahlstrom has donated to it:
>>>>> <http://bit.ly/18NlNwz>.
>>>
>>> That's more than you ever did, you sick Psychopath.
>>>
>>> [snip personal attack]
>>>
>>>> No way Dietrich is going to raise $9,740 in 31 days.
>>>
>>> Who cares?
>>
>> They are childish nuts, aren't they? Snit has proven many times just
>> how low he's willing to go.
>
> Why did you cut the comments of the person you are sucking up to. These
> are the words you support:
>
> ,----
> | Oh Dear, SNOT selfsucking as usual. You can't get enough of your own cum,
> can't
> | you girly boy?
> `----
>
> So Creepy, how LOW can you go?
>
> My god you're a weenie.
Snit
May 16, 2013, 12:38:47 PM5/16/13
to
On 5/16/13 4:45 AM, in article kn2gkg$mfb$1...@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel"
<ze...@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
...
but feels it would be wrong to get Welfare (he indicates as much) but
believes it is OK to be paid to provide a "service" of a hobby WordPress
site. He wants to feel useful. It fits with what he has said... but, again,
I am *not* claiming this is what is happening... I have no idea. Not even
saying it is likely - but it is possible.
>> But he lies. He claims he needs this money to keep a WordPress hobby site up.
>> Utter BS. There are social services which can help him if he truly is in need
>> and if not, as you say, he can go find work or earn his money and not beg for
>> donations.
>
> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
> employers", etc, etc.
>
> So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and instead
> of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
> elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
> hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
> instead?
Right: his story makes no sense. Though, keep in mind, there is no evidence
of him being knowledgeable about Linux in any significant way.
>>> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at
>>> home
>>> and begging for donations.
>>
>> Exactly.
>>
--
<ze...@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
...
>>>>> As predicted: my posting about the absurdity of Dietrich has pushed at
>>>>> least some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>>>>>
>>>>> He never will.
>>>>>
>>>> How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
>>>>
>>>> I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
>>>>
>>>> If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and
>>>> legitimate places that could use the donation.
>>>>
>>>> The OLPC program for one.
>>>>
>>> There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never
>>> send a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off
>>> his ass and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's
>>> either too stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
>>>
>> Or disabled. Or whatever. Fine. Maybe he can find work and maybe he cannot.
>> Maybe he really needs charity to survive, as he says.
>
> There's never been any indication that Dietrich is disabled. If he was then
> he'd be collecting some form/forms of disability which doesn't seem to be the
> case.
I am not saying this *is* the case, but it is possible that he is disabled
>>>>> least some of the herd to donate to him. Dietrich should be thanking me.
>>>>>
>>>>> He never will.
>>>>>
>>>> How much of his $20 per week allowance did Ahlstrom donate?
>>>>
>>>> I can't believe that the herd is that gullible.
>>>>
>>>> If they want to help the Linux cause there are far more useful and
>>>> legitimate places that could use the donation.
>>>>
>>>> The OLPC program for one.
>>>>
>>> There are plenty of worthwhile charities out there. I for one would never
>>> send a cent to an unemployed slob like Dietrich who's too lazy to get off
>>> his ass and find a job. There's plenty of software jobs out there. He's
>>> either too stupid to be employable or simply not trying.
>>>
>> Or disabled. Or whatever. Fine. Maybe he can find work and maybe he cannot.
>> Maybe he really needs charity to survive, as he says.
>
> There's never been any indication that Dietrich is disabled. If he was then
> he'd be collecting some form/forms of disability which doesn't seem to be the
> case.
but feels it would be wrong to get Welfare (he indicates as much) but
believes it is OK to be paid to provide a "service" of a hobby WordPress
site. He wants to feel useful. It fits with what he has said... but, again,
I am *not* claiming this is what is happening... I have no idea. Not even
saying it is likely - but it is possible.
>> But he lies. He claims he needs this money to keep a WordPress hobby site up.
>> Utter BS. There are social services which can help him if he truly is in need
>> and if not, as you say, he can go find work or earn his money and not beg for
>> donations.
>
> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
> employers", etc, etc.
>
> So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and instead
> of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
> elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
> hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
> instead?
of him being knowledgeable about Linux in any significant way.
>>> Instead that bum decided to make a living and career out of sitting at
>>> home
>>> and begging for donations.
>>
>> Exactly.
>>
--
Soupe du Jour
May 17, 2013, 2:10:13 PM5/17/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 05:03:38 -0700, White Spirit wrote:
>
> Linux jobs tend to be more niche, which has advantages and
> disadvantages. There is more variety with Win32 and I'm not ashamed to
> admit that the development I did in my Windows job was much more
> interesting than what I am doing now.
I recently switched my career path from Solaris to GNU/Linux, and I had
>
> Linux jobs tend to be more niche, which has advantages and
> disadvantages. There is more variety with Win32 and I'm not ashamed to
> admit that the development I did in my Windows job was much more
> interesting than what I am doing now.
so many positions to choose from that I didn't have time to go on all the
interviews that companies wanted to setup. The jobs were in a wide
variety of industries and didn't look very niche to me.
I would suggest that you only take jobs that you enjoy. I have no idea
why you would stay at a job that you don't find interesting.
Snit
May 17, 2013, 2:37:24 PM5/17/13
to
On 5/16/13 5:03 AM, in article
dc290828-5299-4de4...@googlegroups.com, "White Spirit"
but it and the competition all have advantages and disadvantages. Even
Stallman says this of the idea of using pure open source software:
"Maybe it wouldn't be quite as good, but we would all be okay."
- Richard Stallman, speaking about if his ideas were followed
He knows it would be technologically limiting... but it would fit his
morals. I can respect that. I do not respect those who lie and say that it
would magically make things technologically better as well.
> There is more variety with Win32 and I'm not ashamed to admit that the
> development I did in my Windows job was much more interesting than what I am
> doing now.
Many, many variables go into it.
>> So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and instead
>> of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
>> elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
>> hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
>> instead?
>
> That would be the sensible option.
This assumes he has a fairly high level of knowledge. Is there any evidence
of this?
--
Questions about the Skype call between cc, Onion Knight, and myself:
1) Why did cc have no recollection of the "outliers" files I showed him?
2) Why did cc have no recollection of the standard deviation video?
3) Why can't cc provide the Excel file he gave his word he would share?
dc290828-5299-4de4...@googlegroups.com, "White Spirit"
<wulfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:45:01 UTC+1, Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
>> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
>> employers", etc, etc.
>
> If that's the case, I can't help wondering why so few people on this group
> work with Linux, and not one of them belongs to the false-advocate clique.
> They seem to parrot any generalisation and sound-bite if it fits in with their
> world-view.
>
> Linux jobs tend to be more niche, which has advantages and disadvantages.
Absolutely. And desktop Linux itself is the best choice for some niches...
> On Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:45:01 UTC+1, Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> How many times have there been posts here about "Huge demands for Linux
>> jobs", "Linux jobs pay so great", "Linux jobs are in such high demand by
>> employers", etc, etc.
>
> If that's the case, I can't help wondering why so few people on this group
> work with Linux, and not one of them belongs to the false-advocate clique.
> They seem to parrot any generalisation and sound-bite if it fits in with their
> world-view.
>
> Linux jobs tend to be more niche, which has advantages and disadvantages.
but it and the competition all have advantages and disadvantages. Even
Stallman says this of the idea of using pure open source software:
"Maybe it wouldn't be quite as good, but we would all be okay."
- Richard Stallman, speaking about if his ideas were followed
He knows it would be technologically limiting... but it would fit his
morals. I can respect that. I do not respect those who lie and say that it
would magically make things technologically better as well.
> There is more variety with Win32 and I'm not ashamed to admit that the
> development I did in my Windows job was much more interesting than what I am
> doing now.
>> So here's a guy, someone who claims to be knowlegable of Linux and instead
>> of getting one of these "High paying Linux jobs that are in demand" he
>> elects to stay home and whine that unless people donate to his personal
>> hobby site he'll be forced into bankruptcy. How about he get a real job
>> instead?
>
> That would be the sensible option.
of this?
--
Questions about the Skype call between cc, Onion Knight, and myself:
1) Why did cc have no recollection of the "outliers" files I showed him?
2) Why did cc have no recollection of the standard deviation video?
3) Why can't cc provide the Excel file he gave his word he would share?
Hadron
May 19, 2013, 10:55:14 AM5/19/13
to
source proprietary SW company.
0 new messages