Continuing the discussion, but before that some fundamentals on what is meant by being a good thinker/intellectual (as that is what is the most painful weakness of our society - we produce too many blind followers/believers and too less thinkers/intellectuals):
- A great life is inspired by love and guided by wisdom. Love manifests in life with the purification of our emotions and motives. Wisdom manifests in life with both the growth of love and the growth of intellectual level. The intellectual level grows due to (a) a great learning spirit manifested through regular reading and self-analysis habits; and (b) by courageously asking questions and sincerely seeking their answers. When we say by courageously asking questions and sincerely seeking their answers, we must understand that the first person regarding whom one should ask questions is oneself. One should first question oneself, one's own beliefs and opinions and then question anyone else's beliefs and opinions. This is the central tenet of true questioning spirit and independent thinking. Otherwise the habit of questioning everyone's beliefs and opinions except one's own beliefs and opinions will always degenerate into ego-thickening intellectual retardation. So, friends! Grow in love and wisdom steadily and be a light to yourself as well as humanity. Friends! Exercise your mind to full capacity before accepting any idea irrespective of who has championed it or for how long it has been accepted by society. Reason may lead you astray some times, but blind beliefs will lead you astray most of the times. A person, who cannot say a strong "NO", never develops the capacity of saying a strong "YES" either. Faith that is produced through sincere doubts is pure and valuable just like the gold that is produced through the fire. In this world, values are eternal, but not views even if they be the views of the wisest people. Immortality is for values and principles, but never for views and opinions. All values and principles are derived from one supreme value of universal love and from universal laws of body, mind and nature whereas all views and opinions are ideas and strategies for manifesting any value or principle in a particular context of time, place and circumstances. Due to this reason, the law of birth, growth and decay always applies to all views and opinions sooner or later. So, hold on to the values and principles espoused by the great ones, but exercise your own brain and be ready to even go against the views and opinions of the great ones if that is the bidding of your own heart and mind.
Now, I want to share one very crucial strength of US executive which is abysmally absent in most developing countries.
The USA President appoints and can remove the top twenty-percent or so of all Executive Branch employees, including Department Secretaries. The same is true at state level also. It has some very good effect as these top twenty-percent come from all strata of intelligentsia. A professor of University of Chicago can be an economic advisor, the President of Google can be in science and technology council, a professor of Harvard Medical School can become health secretary.
As compared to this, our system is plain dumb. Even top bureaucratic positions at state and national level are filled through UPSC and State civil services cadre. Even if some of these civil servants come from technical background, their technical expertise is almost nothing over long period as compared to those continuously working in technical line. A person having MBBS and MD and then becoming a civil servant will have much less knowledge and understanding of medical science than a professor of medical colleges because the later will steadily grow his/her medical science knowledge through research and clinical work. So, even for health secretary, it will always be better to hire such professors than a civil servant even if he/she has got some MBBS and MD degree 15 or 20 years ago.
This dysfunction is very bad. If at the level of state and central secretariats, all executive positions are filled purely based on talent and experience from all fields of academia and industry rather than the present rotten method of filling them completely from civil services, the efficiency of bureaucracy will increase a lot.
This is the first important point.
We should have proper training for our lower-level bureaucrats (assuming higher-level, namely, secretariat level bureaucrats are picked from all segments of academia and industry). Giving one-year executive MBA from IIM as their training as probationers and later on also, giving them flexibility to take some masters or even phds by taking sabbatical leave.
In fact, if this first rule of picking secretariat level bureaucrats from all segments of academia and industry is implemented, even lower-level bureaucrats coming through civil services will have to work much better in order to get any secretariat level position. So, there is a clear trickle-down positive effect.
Third, transparency and accountability, project management and productivity management, performance bonus, promotion based on performance plus expertise plus experience rather than plain seniority - all such management fundamentals that modern corporates apply, should be applied in bureaucracy as well.
Fourth, political system should be cleaned. If our political leaders remain corrupt, then bureaucracy will also remain corrupt. In Bihar, we saw it clearly. Under Laloo regime, no development was done. But, once Nitish became CM, the same bureaucrats created records in achieving development milestones and in tackling crimes and other law-and-order problem. This clearly proved once again how important it is to get good-hearted and intelligent people as our top political leaders. I have already started another thread of discussion on "how to tackle money-power in politics? - please participate in that thread by sharing your valuable insights and experiences.
The success of any bureaucratic reforms depends on the success of political reforms as political leaders are the ones who can do these bureaucratic reforms. And that's where we have to do lots of work. Baba, Rajiv Ji, Dr. Jai Prakash Narayana (of Lok Satta party) are in 40s and 50s. Youths from my generation has to carry forward the momentum generated by these leaders or be ready to even lead the work to success if due to some unfortunate organizational or social reasons, these leaders are unable to lead the work to full success. Due to this very reason, we should courageously ask questions and sincerely seek their answers like good thinkers/intellectuals as we are the future torch-bearers of this nation and we have to succeed in our socio-political goals, however much intelligence and diligence, we have to manifest in our lives.
Jai Hind,
Gopal
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Prakriti (A call to return to the nature)
<prakri...@gmail.com> wrote:
आपका कहना बिलकुल सत्य है. इन्हीं सब बातों का ध्यान रखकर भारत स्वाभिमान आन्दोलन को आगे बढ़ना हैं और एक पूर्ण स्वतंत्र, शक्तिशाली और समृद्ध भारत की नींव रखनी है.