Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
PRIDE and hide the Psor SkIN? --HDL's the SPELL or Hour's of Consumption --Is Cholesterol GOOD? --Antibios Drugs -- Obama Bush CLONE? & Needy? -- Wright or WRONG? -- Cat Stevens
3 views
Skip to first unread message
randall
May 17, 2012, 10:30:15 PM5/17/12
to
hi
wow... fun fun fun till i ate the T-bird... LOL
i'm on a roll
last two 2 night
Thurs, May 17 2012 6:29 pm
Subject: SKIN Dorklizations & Political GAMEs & Being WHITE in the
WORLD? --TyRP1 mutation ->P450 ? -- Politicow Intrigue -- 60 minutes
-- DRD4 7R allele --Nora Volkow -- Sugar - Germ GANGS -> Byron
Richards ---
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.skin-diseases.psoriasis/msg/0639dc124d11a566
Or this one:
Thurs, May 17 2012 7:02 pm
Subject: Hendrix -> If 6 was 9 --- Sweet SUGAR --> Fructose Fork uP?
--
Barack & Insulin Resistant? --D3 -> NCCAM --Lycopene --Vitamin or MAN?
- W3 or W6 or n9? --> StuPid? -- Leptin & Pde4 Inhibitors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.skin-diseases.psoriasis/msg/0f7c02f6dc69c7d6
And now...>>>>
Bible time:
Is DRD4 7R in the bible?
YES and it's indirect as they didn't have OUR tools you FOOL... LOL
They may have explained the syndrome we FOUND in some GENE... duh?
How so know so?
<< Proverbs 16:18 >>
uPdated version: randall 101:
Pride sucks and you f*ck up.... LOL
Which brings up:
How come every drd4 7R allele (2 copies) dna dork: say--> it's not my
FAULT?
Co-incident or the path to heaven is narrow and suck up's fu*k up?
<< Matthew 7:13 >>
New Living Translation (2007)
"You can enter God's Kingdom only through the narrow gate. The highway
to hell is broad, and its gate is wide for the many who choose that
way.
<snip>
Yet in gay-ish vernacular:
Narrow is a tight butt hole.... but not for wong... LOL
and:
A long john sliver may ameliorate, butt not for wrong?
LOL
sorry for the GAY pause... but obama is wong and might need some
impetus to BE REAL...
GAY MaRRIAGE can save the WORLD.... if you think.... about it...duh..
We have global warming and we need to stop excess humans from being
BORN..
certainly those muslims are going full tilt... birth wise...
is that smart or a FART of their culture?
Or are the global dorks just a HUGE LIE?
Is it a moment for LIFE? And is it rife?
I love YOU!
Nicki Minaj - Moment 4 Life (Clean Version) ft. Drake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7GW8TYCEG4
<55 million hits> <6:11 - timw>
i thought it would NEVER end.... <w><G>
if i could have back the time for another moment of LIFE!
Whose the cute chocolate rap monkey? I want some... LOL
Everybobby dies but not lives? LOL
Duh... i lost 2 stick bugs who meant more to me then YOU...LOL
OH i get it... he's chris brown... some clown... he should run for
president now that we've had... well... a dude...ERAP1... er.. dud...
huh?
Duh, randall tar baby he's cool... you fool
Hey! id squid i didn't kNOw so...
duh..
This is more like it:
<don't miss the commerical>
Nicki Minaj - Right By My Side (Explicit) ft. Chris Brown
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he3DJLXbebI
OK id squid... duh... i LIKE it... so why haven't you shown it to
me...:?
Your stupidly?
OK, guilty as it's a pleasure on the low road to fiefdom.
Please don't be dumb, stupid juan?
OK...i'm going preezy now instead... LOL
Hey... a spud for preezy seems more likely now that preezy dent is
calling the shots. <G>
I recall when i read a thing about omega-3 being good in the mid 90's,
so changing my LIPID diet lowered
my pasi levels by 30% plus in six weeks or so.. And then hit the
proverbial plateau. :(
At the time it was VERY Exciting to control any level of psoriasis
with a simple dietary change.
And drinking 30% plus of the GRAIL was better then nothing... but not
better then noting. LOL
So....?
Now we've got a possible... hour of the DAY to eat it!
So eat it?
Let's...
"Weird Al" Yankovic - Eat It
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcJjMnHoIBI&ob=av2n
So sorry Weird AL... i'm rePeating it... it does matter aPParently...
Don't eat it at the WRONG time of DAY!
Unless...
If we become MICE.... but some genes are conserved, so it deserves to
be LOOKed at!
Forget what you ATE.... it's WHEN you aTE it... LOL
i 8 it at 3:00 am.... am i BAD?
Will i FLARE up? And thus, GO MAD!
ONLY if your a HATTER! Or hate the platter's....
Platters - Smoke Gets In Your Eyes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57tK6aQS_H0
<time: 2:31> <almost: 5.5 million views>
One of my fav's btw....and smoky of course and we lost the queen of
disco today...
Goodbye Sweet LaDonna Summer's... we'll miss you!
You are still HOT stuff:
Donna Summer- Hot Stuff
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IdEhvuNxV8
<3:49> <4.45 million views>
Donna Summers --- Love to love you baby
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPXizlnS7go&feature=related
I will hear you in my DREAMs for all time...
Maybe you and that Gibbs bro who passed can do how deep is your love
in heaven?
Bee Gees - How Deep Is Your Love
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBMriOspUvA&feature=related
OK... food curse or cure?
What if i was on the moon?
What time do you flare up THERE?
http://health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2012/05/17/its-not-just-what-you-eat-its-when-you-eat-mouse-study-finds
It's Not Just What You Eat, It's When You Eat, Mouse Study Finds
Restricting eating hours didn't cut calorie intake, yet the animals
gained less weight
THURSDAY, May 17 (HealthDay News) -- While most of the research on
diet and obesity focuses on what people eat, a new study in mice
suggests that more attention should be given to when people eat.
U.S. researchers found that mice that were only allowed to eat for
eight hours a day ate as much as mice that were allowed to eat around
the clock. Both groups ate a high-fat diet, but the mice with the
restricted eating hours gained less weight, had healthier livers and
had less inflammation.
The findings, published online May 17 in Cell Metabolism, suggest that
eating during too many hours of the day may contribute to obesity.
"Every organ has a clock," lead author Satchidananda Panda, of the
Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., said in a
journal news release.
That means there are times of the day that the organs, including the
liver, intestines and muscles, operate at peak efficiency and other
times when they work less efficiently, Panda said. These cycles are
critical for processes ranging from cholesterol breakdown to glucose
production. Frequent eating throughout the day and night may throw off
these normal metabolic cycles, he suggested in the news release.
"When we eat randomly, those genes aren't on completely or off
completely," Panda explained.
The study results indicate that having restricted meal times may help
prevent weight gain and that when people eat should be given more
attention by obesity researchers.
"The focus has been on what people eat. We don't collect data on when
people eat," Panda noted.
While studies involving animals can be useful, they frequently fail to
produce similar results in humans.
More information
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about
weight.
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/index.html
What time is it to rock around the clock?
Huh? Satchidananda Panda? What time is that?
Right NOW:
Bill Haley - Rock Around The Clock (1956)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5fsqYctXgM
<time: 1:55> <views: 9.6 + plus million>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
HDL not as GOOD without GENETICs?
May 17, 2012
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57436495-10391704/good-hdl-cholesterol-may-not-protect-heart-after-all-study-suggests/
"Good" HDL cholesterol may not protect heart after all, study suggests
By Ryan Jaslow
(CBS News) We've heard it all before: There's "good" cholesterol,
called high-density lipoprotein (HDL), that provides protective
benefits against heart attacks and then there's "bad" LDL cholesterol,
which raises risk for heart problems in high levels.
Dark chocolate outperforms white chocolate in heart benefits study
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57421020-10391704/dark-chocolate-outperforms-white-chocolate-in-heart-benefits-study/
CDC: Only 13 percent of Americans have high cholesterol
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57421375-10391704/cdc-only-13-percent-of-americans-have-high-cholesterol/
Raising 'good' cholesterol may cut heart risk in diabetes patients
http://www.webmd.com/cholesterol-management/news/20120516/raising-hdl-levels-may-not-lower-heart-attack-risk
A new study finds that HDL cholesterol might not boost your heart
health as doctors once thought.
The study looked at the genes of about 170,000 individuals, looking
for variations in DNA that earlier research shows naturally raise HDL
levels in those who possess them. After looking for these 15 genetic
variations - called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) - in the
participants, the researchers discovered none of these variations
actually reduced their risks for having a heart attack, compared with
people who didn't have the variations.
For example, carriers of one such SNP, so-called "protein-coding
change in the endothelial lipase gene," have HDL levels that are
naturally 10 percent higher than most people, an elevation that's
expected to reduce heart attack risk by 13 percent. But the study
found they in fact had the same risk as non-carriers.
"It's been assumed that if a patient, or group of patients, did
something to cause their HDL levels to go up, then you can safely
assume that their risk of heart attack will go down," senior author
Dr. Sekar Kathiresan, director of preventive cardiology at
Massachusetts General Hospital, and associate professor of medicine at
Harvard Medical School, said in a news release. "This work
fundamentally questions that."
Kathiresan told WebMD that HDL remains an important tool for assessing
heart disease risk, but the new research raises questions about the
benefits of taking medication to raise HDL levels.
Cholesterol in the blood is carried by particles called lipoproteins,
which come in different sizes and densities, according to the
researchers. There is a well-established connection between elevated
LDL levels and heart attack, and decades of research - including
genetic studies similar to the new study - paved the way for the
development of lipid-lowering drugs known as statins.
But research has been less clear on HDL, since a study more than 30
years ago found the higher levels of HDL a person had, the least
likely they were to have a heart attack. Mouse studies since then have
reported similar findings, but researchers haven't been able to prove
the link conclusively. The new study may provide the clearest evidence
yet of the role HDL plays, the researchers said.
"Through our research, we have found that all roads that raise HDL do
not always lead to the promise land of reduced risk of heart attack,"
said study co-author Dr. Benjamin F. Voight, an assistant professor of
pharmacology at the University of Pennsylvania, said in a university
written statement.
Experts commenting on the study appeared to agree with that sentiment.
"The current study tells us that when it comes to HDL we should
seriously consider going back to the drawing board, in this case
meaning back to the laboratory," Dr. Michael Lauer, director of the
division of cardiovascular sciences at the National Heart, Lung and
Blood Institute, told The New York Times. "We need to encourage basic
laboratory scientists to figure out where HDL fits in the puzzle -
just what exactly is it a marker for."
American Heart Association past president Dr. Robert Eckel, a
professor of medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine
in Aurora, told WebMD the new research casts more doubt on the
strategy of raising HDL to lower heart and stroke risk.
"HDL levels are related to risk, but that doesn't mean that raising
HDL is beneficial," he says. "What we do know is that lowering LDL has
a big impact on risk, so the take-home message remains, 'Get those LDL
numbers down.'"
<snip>
Sekar has some interesting work:
123 hits Kathiresan S[Author]-pubmed:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Kathiresan%20S%5BAuthor%5D
But i don't see the one that goes with the above. It must be #124?
*************************
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/17/health/research/hdl-good-cholesterol-found-not-to-cut-heart-risk.html?_r=1
Doubt Cast on the ‘Good’ in ‘Good Cholesterol’
By GINA KOLATA
Published: May 16, 2012
Or so the theory went.
Now, a new study that makes use of powerful databases of genetic
information has found that raising HDL levels may not make any
difference to heart disease risk. People who inherit genes that give
them naturally higher HDL levels throughout life have no less heart
disease than those who inherit genes that give them slightly lower
levels. If HDL were protective, those with genes causing higher levels
should have had less heart disease.
Researchers not associated with the study, published online Wednesday
in The Lancet, found the results compelling and disturbing. Companies
are actively developing and testing drugs that raise HDL, although
three recent studies of such treatments have failed. And patients with
low HDL levels are often told to try to raise them by exercising or
dieting or even by taking niacin, which raised HDL but failed to lower
heart disease risk in a recent clinical trial.
“I’d say the HDL hypothesis is on the ropes right now,” said Dr. James
A. de Lemos, a professor at the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, who was not involved in the study.
Dr. Michael Lauer, director of the division of cardiovascular sciences
at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, agreed.
“The current study tells us that when it comes to HDL we should
seriously consider going back to the drawing board, in this case
meaning back to the laboratory,” said Dr. Lauer, who also was not
connected to the research. “We need to encourage basic laboratory
scientists to figure out where HDL fits in the puzzle — just what
exactly is it a marker for.”
But Dr. Steven Nissen, chairman of cardiovascular medicine at the
Cleveland Clinic, who is helping conduct studies of HDL-raising drugs,
said he remained hopeful. HDL is complex, he said, and it is possible
that some types of HDL molecules might in fact protect against heart
disease.
“I am an optimist,” Dr. Nissen said.
The study’s authors emphasize that they are not questioning the well-
documented finding that higher HDL levels are associated with lower
heart disease risk. But the relationship may not be causative. Many
assumed it was because the association was so strong and consistent.
Researchers also had a hypothesis to explain how HDL might work. From
studies with mice and with cells grown in the laboratory, they
proposed that HDL ferried cholesterol out of arteries where it did not
belong.
Now it seems that instead of directly reducing heart disease risk,
high HDL levels may be a sign that something else is going on that
makes heart disease less likely. To investigate the relationship
between HDL and cardiovascular risk, the researchers, led by Dr. Sekar
Kathiresan, director of preventive cardiology at Massachusetts General
Hospital and a geneticist at the Broad Institute of M.I.T. and
Harvard, used a method known as Mendelian randomization. It is a study
design that has recently become feasible with the advent of quick and
lower-cost genetic analyses.
The idea is that people inherit any of a wide variety of genetic
variations that determine how much HDL they produce. The result is
that people are naturally and randomly assigned by these variations in
their inherited genes to make more, or less, HDL, throughout their
lives. If HDL reduces the risk of heart disease, then those who make
more should be at lower risk.
For purposes of comparison, the researchers also examined inherited
variations in 13 genes that determine levels of LDL, the so-called bad
cholesterol. It is well known and widely accepted that lowering LDL
levels by any means — diet and exercise, statin drugs — reduces risk.
Clinical trials with statins established with certainty that reducing
LDL levels is protective. So, the researchers asked, did people who
inherited gene variations that affected their LDL levels, have
correspondingly higher or lower heart disease risk?
The study found, as expected, that gene variations that raise LDL
increase risk and those that lower LDL decrease risk. The gene effects
often were tiny, altering LDL levels by only a few percent. But the
data, involving tens of thousands of people, clearly showed effects on
risk.
“That speaks to how powerful LDL is,” Dr. Kathiresan said.
But the HDL story was very different. First the investigators looked
at variations in a well-known gene, endothelial lipase, that affects
only HDL. About 2.6 percent of the population has a variation in that
gene that raises their HDL levels by about 6 points. The investigators
looked at 116,000 people, asking if they had the variant and if those
who carried the HDL-raising variant had lower risk for heart disease.
“We found absolutely no association between the HDL-boosting variant
and risk for heart disease,” Dr. Kathiresan said. “That was very
surprising to us.”
Then they looked at a group of 14 gene variants that also affect HDL
levels, asking if there was a relationship between these variants and
risk for heart disease. The data included genetic data on 53,500
people. Once again, there was no association between having the
variants that increased HDL and risk of heart disease.
Dr. Lauer explains what that means with an analogy.
“One might think of a highway accident that causes a massive traffic
jam,” he said. “Stewing in the jam many miles away, I might be tempted
to strike the sign that says ‘accident ahead,’ but that won’t do any
good. The ‘accident-ahead’ sign is not the cause of the traffic jam —
the accident is. Analogously, targeting HDL won’t help if it’s merely
a sign.”
Dr. Kathiresan said there were many things HDL might indicate. “The
number of factors that track with low HDL is a mile long,” he said.
“Obesity, being sedentary, smoking, insulin resistance, having small
LDL particles, having increased cholesterol in remnant particles, and
having increased amounts of coagulation factors in the blood,” he
said. “Our hypothesis is that much of the association may be due to
these other factors.”
“I often see patients in the clinic with low HDL levels who ask how
they can raise it,” Dr. Kathiresan said. “I tell them, ‘It means you
are at increased risk, but I don’t know if raising it will affect your
risk.’ ”
That often does not go over well, he added. The notion that HDL is
protective is so entrenched that the study’s conclusions may prove
hard to accept, he and other researchers said.
“When people see numbers in the abnormal range they want to do
something about it,” Dr. Kathiresan said. “It is very hard to get
across the concept that the safest thing might be to leave people
alone.”
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: May 16, 2012
Because of an editing error, a correction with an earlier version of
this article was appended mistakenly, and described niacin
incorrectly. While niacin is a vitamin, as the correction noted, it is
considered a drug when given at pharmaceutical doses, as in a recent
trial in which it was shown to raise HDL without lowering heart
disease risk.
<snip>
ONE BAD guy is antibiotics....yikes..
Azithromycin -- aka --> Zithromax
KILLS Good gut bugs...and the BAD ones.
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/antibiotic-linked-rare-deadly-heart-risk-exchange-zithromax-azithromycin-doctors-article-1.1080016
Zithromax linked with rare but deadly heart risk; Expensive antibiotic
used to treat bronchitis, sinus infections and pneumonia
Results suggests doctors should prescribe other options for patients
with heart problems
Zithromax, or azithromycin, is more expensive than other antibiotics,
but it's popular because it often can be taken for fewer days. But the
results suggest doctors should prescribe other options for people
already prone to heart problems, the researchers and other experts
said.
Read more:
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/antibiotic-linked-rare-deadly-heart-risk-exchange-zithromax-azithromycin-doctors-article-1.1080016#ixzz1vAH6eKl4
An antibiotic widely used for bronchitis and other common infections
seems to increase chances for sudden deadly heart problems, a rare but
surprising risk found in a 14-year study.
Zithromax, or azithromycin, is more expensive than other antibiotics,
but it's popular because it often can be taken for fewer days. But the
results suggest doctors should prescribe other options for people
already prone to heart problems, the researchers and other experts
said.
Vanderbilt University researchers analyzed health records and data on
millions of prescriptions for several antibiotics given to about
540,000 Tennessee Medicaid patients from 1992 to 2006. There were 29
heart-related deaths among those who took Zithromax during five days
of treatment. Their risk of death while taking the drug was more than
double that of patients on another antibiotic, amoxicillin, or those
who took none.
To compare risks, the researchers calculated that the number of deaths
per 1 million courses of antibiotics would be about 85 among Zithromax
patients versus 32 among amoxicillin patients and 30 among those on no
antibiotics. The highest risks were in Zithromax patients with
existing heart problems.
Patients in each group started out with comparable risks for heart
trouble, the researchers said.
The results suggest there would be 47 extra heart-related deaths per 1
million courses of treatment with Zithromax, compared with
amoxicillin. A usual treatment course for Zithromax is about five
days, versus about 10 days for amoxicillin and other antibiotics.
Zithromax is at least twice as expensive as generic amoxicillin;
online prescription drug sellers charge a few dollars per pill for
Zithromax.
"People need to recognize that the overall risk is low," said Dr.
Harlan Krumholz, a Yale University health outcomes specialist who was
not involved in the study. More research is needed to confirm the
findings, but still, he said patients with heart disease "should
probably be steered away" from Zithromax for now.
The study appears in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine. The
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute helped pay for the research.
Zithromax, marketed by Pfizer Inc., has been available in the United
States for two decades. It's often used to treat bronchitis, sinus
infections and pneumonia. Wayne Ray, a Vanderbilt professor of
medicine, decided to study the drug's risks because of evidence
linking it with potential heart rhythm problems. Also, antibiotics in
the same class as Zithromax have been linked with sudden cardiac
death.
Zithromax is among top-selling antibiotics. U.S. sales last year
totaled $464 million, according to IMS Health, a health care
information and services company.
Pfizer issued a statement saying it would thoroughly review the study.
"Patient safety is of the utmost importance to Pfizer and we
continuously monitor the safety and efficacy of our products to ensure
that the benefits and risks are accurately described," the company
said.
Patients studied were age 50 on average and not hospitalized. Most had
common ailments, including sinus infections and bronchitis. Those on
Zithromax were about as healthy as those on other antibiotics, making
it unlikely that an underlying condition might explain the increased
death risk.
Medicaid patients generally have more disability and lower incomes
than other patients, so whether the same results would be found in the
general population is uncertain, Ray said.
Dr. Bruce Psaty, a professor of medicine at the University of
Washington, said doctors and patients need to know about the potential
risks. He said the results also raise concerns about long-term use of
Zithromax, which other research suggests could benefit people with
severe lung disease. Additional research is needed to determine if
that kind of use could be dangerous, he said.
<snip>
I know... obama has half white and half BLACK gut flora...
But, but, butt hole randall tar baby smells like...
that is rascist!
No it isn't.
We all can trace our DNA baracka to mitochondrial EVE.
To barack obama you say?
Yes... he's become .... well... white and nerdy living in the white
house.
NO way, jose!
Yes, id squid... he is... sadly to white and bush like..
He's almost 65% a bush clone now...
which btw, makes him white and nerdy...
Here look:
"Weird Al" Yankovic - White & Nerdy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9qYF9DZPdw
<views: 70,578,139> <2:51 time>
Dang... good thing he's only HALF white... LOL
But being BLACK and turdy is also nerdy!
Will he do the putney swope walk out?
Will barack say REVEREND Wright was right about God DAMN AMERICA?
Long excerpt of Wright's "God Damn America" speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV-oI__bHA4
63 hits on youtube for: god damn amerika! from revey pooh wrigh:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=reverend+wright+god+damn+america+speech&oq=reverend+wright+god+damn+america+speech&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=youtube.12...0.0.0.18260.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0.
Maybe Obama's god is allahu akbar?
I don't mind... but be real and tell the truth?
Allahu Akbar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUs2iRftp-s
They could update their music to rap?
Might bring in more converts?
Who was... it that i loved so much..?
Oh, oh, it's CAT Steven's.. he's gone Allahu Akbar for a LONG time
now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_Stevens
Yusuf Islam (born Steven Demetre Georgiou, 21 July 1948), commonly
known by his former stage name Cat Stevens, is an English singer-
songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, educator, philanthropist, and
prominent convert to Islam.[3]
<snip>
Should i read:
The Amateur
Edward Klein (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/The-Amateur-Edward-Klein/dp/1596987855
[...] Editorial Reviews
From the Inside Flap
Think you know the real Barack Obama? You don’t—not until you’ve read
The Amateur
In this stunning exposé, bestselling author Edward Klein—a
contributing editor to Vanity Fair, former foreign editor of Newsweek,
and former editor-in-chief of the New York Times Magazine—pulls back
the curtain on one of the most secretive White Houses in history. He
reveals a callow, thin-skinned, arrogant president with messianic
dreams of grandeur supported by a cast of true-believers, all of them
united by leftist politics and an amateurish understanding of
executive leadership.
In The Amateur you’ll discover:
Why the so-called “centrist” Obama is actually in revolt against the
values of the society he was elected to lead
Why Bill Clinton loathes Barack Obama and tried to get Hillary to run
against him in 2012
The spiteful rivalry between Michelle Obama and Oprah Winfrey
How Obama split the Kennedy family
How Obama has taken more of a personal role in making foreign policy
than any president since Richard Nixon—with disastrous results
How Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett are the real powers behind the
White House throne
The Amateur is a reporter’s book, buttressed by nearly 200 interviews,
many of them with the insiders who know Obama best. The result is the
most important political book of the year. You will never look at
Barack Obama the same way again.
From the Back Cover
Praise for The Amateur
“The Amateur is the best book I’ve read on how Barack Obama is
wrecking our country. I urge everyone who cares about America to read
Edward Klein’s eye-opening book.”
—Donald J. Trump, world-famous businessman, owner and host of the hit
NBC TV shows The Apprentice and Celebrity Apprentice, and bestselling
author of many titles, including Time to Get Tough: Making America #1
Again
“This is a racy, entertaining, informative book that illuminates
aspects of Obama and his team that have not been previously reported.
A necessary antidote to the Obama worship that is sure to characterize
the election debate.”
—Dinesh D’Souza, president of The King’s College and bestselling
author of The Roots of Obama’s Rage
“All the horrors I predicted in Welcome to Obamaland have now been
definitively proven true by Edward Klein’s rip-roaringly readable new
book The Amateur, which uses great stories and great reporting to
illustrate just how ideological, arrogant, and hapless Obama and his
administration really are. An outstanding demolition job on the most
overrated president of our time.”
—James Delingpole, columnist for the Daily Telegraph and the Spectator
and author of Welcome to Obamaland
“A devastating indictment of the lethal combination of incompetence
and radicalism that has made Obama into one of the worst presidents in
American history.”
—Norman Podhoretz, former editor of Commentary magazine and author of
many books, including most recently, Why Are Jews Liberals?
<snip>
Does Barack and the girls get off on :::
Wild World - Cat Stevens
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_0U3DlLFSU
Or how about the crap in the cradle?
Cat Stevens - Cat's in the cradle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSwL9deXNW8&feature=related
I'm going to BE like glue .... or sniff it.. and be a demodork
and give money to soros... so he can drill off of anywhere and screw
america.
So obama is a jerk off!
Hey!
Id squid!!!... stop that... we don't know if he's a jerk off.
Geez... just look at moooooooooooooo....chels big behind.
Isn't that a rap tap tip tap pit pat thingy pooh?
So it's ok, right?
Sir Mix-A-Lot - Baby Got Back (I Like Big Butts)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reTx5sqvVJ4
<4:16> <1.233 million views>
Done for kids:
Spongebob and friends - I LIKE BIG BUTTS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-K-dgZneR4&feature=related
Wow... reaL art!
No wonder her butt is bigger pigger then tax crack power
hungry ...YKW...
No?
Who?
Whose on 1st....
What's on 2nd!
and if ykw has a second germ we're screwed....
But ykw wants us to believe it's already to late..
oh?
yes.. power hungry bitch... LOL
Got's to spend that $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ on your USofA credit card...LOL
or what?
We don't have a haPPy paPPy craPPy preezy?
randall... so what ski? is he done ski? Will he ski... suck ski? on
a luau ski?
wow... fun fun fun till i ate the T-bird... LOL
i'm on a roll
last two 2 night
Thurs, May 17 2012 6:29 pm
Subject: SKIN Dorklizations & Political GAMEs & Being WHITE in the
WORLD? --TyRP1 mutation ->P450 ? -- Politicow Intrigue -- 60 minutes
-- DRD4 7R allele --Nora Volkow -- Sugar - Germ GANGS -> Byron
Richards ---
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.skin-diseases.psoriasis/msg/0639dc124d11a566
Or this one:
Thurs, May 17 2012 7:02 pm
Subject: Hendrix -> If 6 was 9 --- Sweet SUGAR --> Fructose Fork uP?
--
Barack & Insulin Resistant? --D3 -> NCCAM --Lycopene --Vitamin or MAN?
- W3 or W6 or n9? --> StuPid? -- Leptin & Pde4 Inhibitors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.skin-diseases.psoriasis/msg/0f7c02f6dc69c7d6
And now...>>>>
Bible time:
Is DRD4 7R in the bible?
YES and it's indirect as they didn't have OUR tools you FOOL... LOL
They may have explained the syndrome we FOUND in some GENE... duh?
How so know so?
<< Proverbs 16:18 >>
uPdated version: randall 101:
Pride sucks and you f*ck up.... LOL
Which brings up:
How come every drd4 7R allele (2 copies) dna dork: say--> it's not my
FAULT?
Co-incident or the path to heaven is narrow and suck up's fu*k up?
<< Matthew 7:13 >>
New Living Translation (2007)
"You can enter God's Kingdom only through the narrow gate. The highway
to hell is broad, and its gate is wide for the many who choose that
way.
<snip>
Yet in gay-ish vernacular:
Narrow is a tight butt hole.... but not for wong... LOL
and:
A long john sliver may ameliorate, butt not for wrong?
LOL
sorry for the GAY pause... but obama is wong and might need some
impetus to BE REAL...
GAY MaRRIAGE can save the WORLD.... if you think.... about it...duh..
We have global warming and we need to stop excess humans from being
BORN..
certainly those muslims are going full tilt... birth wise...
is that smart or a FART of their culture?
Or are the global dorks just a HUGE LIE?
Is it a moment for LIFE? And is it rife?
I love YOU!
Nicki Minaj - Moment 4 Life (Clean Version) ft. Drake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7GW8TYCEG4
<55 million hits> <6:11 - timw>
i thought it would NEVER end.... <w><G>
if i could have back the time for another moment of LIFE!
Whose the cute chocolate rap monkey? I want some... LOL
Everybobby dies but not lives? LOL
Duh... i lost 2 stick bugs who meant more to me then YOU...LOL
OH i get it... he's chris brown... some clown... he should run for
president now that we've had... well... a dude...ERAP1... er.. dud...
huh?
Duh, randall tar baby he's cool... you fool
Hey! id squid i didn't kNOw so...
duh..
This is more like it:
<don't miss the commerical>
Nicki Minaj - Right By My Side (Explicit) ft. Chris Brown
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he3DJLXbebI
OK id squid... duh... i LIKE it... so why haven't you shown it to
me...:?
Your stupidly?
OK, guilty as it's a pleasure on the low road to fiefdom.
Please don't be dumb, stupid juan?
OK...i'm going preezy now instead... LOL
Hey... a spud for preezy seems more likely now that preezy dent is
calling the shots. <G>
I recall when i read a thing about omega-3 being good in the mid 90's,
so changing my LIPID diet lowered
my pasi levels by 30% plus in six weeks or so.. And then hit the
proverbial plateau. :(
At the time it was VERY Exciting to control any level of psoriasis
with a simple dietary change.
And drinking 30% plus of the GRAIL was better then nothing... but not
better then noting. LOL
So....?
Now we've got a possible... hour of the DAY to eat it!
So eat it?
Let's...
"Weird Al" Yankovic - Eat It
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcJjMnHoIBI&ob=av2n
So sorry Weird AL... i'm rePeating it... it does matter aPParently...
Don't eat it at the WRONG time of DAY!
Unless...
If we become MICE.... but some genes are conserved, so it deserves to
be LOOKed at!
Forget what you ATE.... it's WHEN you aTE it... LOL
i 8 it at 3:00 am.... am i BAD?
Will i FLARE up? And thus, GO MAD!
ONLY if your a HATTER! Or hate the platter's....
Platters - Smoke Gets In Your Eyes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57tK6aQS_H0
<time: 2:31> <almost: 5.5 million views>
One of my fav's btw....and smoky of course and we lost the queen of
disco today...
Goodbye Sweet LaDonna Summer's... we'll miss you!
You are still HOT stuff:
Donna Summer- Hot Stuff
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IdEhvuNxV8
<3:49> <4.45 million views>
Donna Summers --- Love to love you baby
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPXizlnS7go&feature=related
I will hear you in my DREAMs for all time...
Maybe you and that Gibbs bro who passed can do how deep is your love
in heaven?
Bee Gees - How Deep Is Your Love
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBMriOspUvA&feature=related
OK... food curse or cure?
What if i was on the moon?
What time do you flare up THERE?
http://health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2012/05/17/its-not-just-what-you-eat-its-when-you-eat-mouse-study-finds
It's Not Just What You Eat, It's When You Eat, Mouse Study Finds
Restricting eating hours didn't cut calorie intake, yet the animals
gained less weight
THURSDAY, May 17 (HealthDay News) -- While most of the research on
diet and obesity focuses on what people eat, a new study in mice
suggests that more attention should be given to when people eat.
U.S. researchers found that mice that were only allowed to eat for
eight hours a day ate as much as mice that were allowed to eat around
the clock. Both groups ate a high-fat diet, but the mice with the
restricted eating hours gained less weight, had healthier livers and
had less inflammation.
The findings, published online May 17 in Cell Metabolism, suggest that
eating during too many hours of the day may contribute to obesity.
"Every organ has a clock," lead author Satchidananda Panda, of the
Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., said in a
journal news release.
That means there are times of the day that the organs, including the
liver, intestines and muscles, operate at peak efficiency and other
times when they work less efficiently, Panda said. These cycles are
critical for processes ranging from cholesterol breakdown to glucose
production. Frequent eating throughout the day and night may throw off
these normal metabolic cycles, he suggested in the news release.
"When we eat randomly, those genes aren't on completely or off
completely," Panda explained.
The study results indicate that having restricted meal times may help
prevent weight gain and that when people eat should be given more
attention by obesity researchers.
"The focus has been on what people eat. We don't collect data on when
people eat," Panda noted.
While studies involving animals can be useful, they frequently fail to
produce similar results in humans.
More information
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about
weight.
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/index.html
What time is it to rock around the clock?
Huh? Satchidananda Panda? What time is that?
Right NOW:
Bill Haley - Rock Around The Clock (1956)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5fsqYctXgM
<time: 1:55> <views: 9.6 + plus million>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
HDL not as GOOD without GENETICs?
May 17, 2012
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57436495-10391704/good-hdl-cholesterol-may-not-protect-heart-after-all-study-suggests/
"Good" HDL cholesterol may not protect heart after all, study suggests
By Ryan Jaslow
(CBS News) We've heard it all before: There's "good" cholesterol,
called high-density lipoprotein (HDL), that provides protective
benefits against heart attacks and then there's "bad" LDL cholesterol,
which raises risk for heart problems in high levels.
Dark chocolate outperforms white chocolate in heart benefits study
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57421020-10391704/dark-chocolate-outperforms-white-chocolate-in-heart-benefits-study/
CDC: Only 13 percent of Americans have high cholesterol
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57421375-10391704/cdc-only-13-percent-of-americans-have-high-cholesterol/
Raising 'good' cholesterol may cut heart risk in diabetes patients
http://www.webmd.com/cholesterol-management/news/20120516/raising-hdl-levels-may-not-lower-heart-attack-risk
A new study finds that HDL cholesterol might not boost your heart
health as doctors once thought.
The study looked at the genes of about 170,000 individuals, looking
for variations in DNA that earlier research shows naturally raise HDL
levels in those who possess them. After looking for these 15 genetic
variations - called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) - in the
participants, the researchers discovered none of these variations
actually reduced their risks for having a heart attack, compared with
people who didn't have the variations.
For example, carriers of one such SNP, so-called "protein-coding
change in the endothelial lipase gene," have HDL levels that are
naturally 10 percent higher than most people, an elevation that's
expected to reduce heart attack risk by 13 percent. But the study
found they in fact had the same risk as non-carriers.
"It's been assumed that if a patient, or group of patients, did
something to cause their HDL levels to go up, then you can safely
assume that their risk of heart attack will go down," senior author
Dr. Sekar Kathiresan, director of preventive cardiology at
Massachusetts General Hospital, and associate professor of medicine at
Harvard Medical School, said in a news release. "This work
fundamentally questions that."
Kathiresan told WebMD that HDL remains an important tool for assessing
heart disease risk, but the new research raises questions about the
benefits of taking medication to raise HDL levels.
Cholesterol in the blood is carried by particles called lipoproteins,
which come in different sizes and densities, according to the
researchers. There is a well-established connection between elevated
LDL levels and heart attack, and decades of research - including
genetic studies similar to the new study - paved the way for the
development of lipid-lowering drugs known as statins.
But research has been less clear on HDL, since a study more than 30
years ago found the higher levels of HDL a person had, the least
likely they were to have a heart attack. Mouse studies since then have
reported similar findings, but researchers haven't been able to prove
the link conclusively. The new study may provide the clearest evidence
yet of the role HDL plays, the researchers said.
"Through our research, we have found that all roads that raise HDL do
not always lead to the promise land of reduced risk of heart attack,"
said study co-author Dr. Benjamin F. Voight, an assistant professor of
pharmacology at the University of Pennsylvania, said in a university
written statement.
Experts commenting on the study appeared to agree with that sentiment.
"The current study tells us that when it comes to HDL we should
seriously consider going back to the drawing board, in this case
meaning back to the laboratory," Dr. Michael Lauer, director of the
division of cardiovascular sciences at the National Heart, Lung and
Blood Institute, told The New York Times. "We need to encourage basic
laboratory scientists to figure out where HDL fits in the puzzle -
just what exactly is it a marker for."
American Heart Association past president Dr. Robert Eckel, a
professor of medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine
in Aurora, told WebMD the new research casts more doubt on the
strategy of raising HDL to lower heart and stroke risk.
"HDL levels are related to risk, but that doesn't mean that raising
HDL is beneficial," he says. "What we do know is that lowering LDL has
a big impact on risk, so the take-home message remains, 'Get those LDL
numbers down.'"
<snip>
Sekar has some interesting work:
123 hits Kathiresan S[Author]-pubmed:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Kathiresan%20S%5BAuthor%5D
But i don't see the one that goes with the above. It must be #124?
*************************
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/17/health/research/hdl-good-cholesterol-found-not-to-cut-heart-risk.html?_r=1
Doubt Cast on the ‘Good’ in ‘Good Cholesterol’
By GINA KOLATA
Published: May 16, 2012
Or so the theory went.
Now, a new study that makes use of powerful databases of genetic
information has found that raising HDL levels may not make any
difference to heart disease risk. People who inherit genes that give
them naturally higher HDL levels throughout life have no less heart
disease than those who inherit genes that give them slightly lower
levels. If HDL were protective, those with genes causing higher levels
should have had less heart disease.
Researchers not associated with the study, published online Wednesday
in The Lancet, found the results compelling and disturbing. Companies
are actively developing and testing drugs that raise HDL, although
three recent studies of such treatments have failed. And patients with
low HDL levels are often told to try to raise them by exercising or
dieting or even by taking niacin, which raised HDL but failed to lower
heart disease risk in a recent clinical trial.
“I’d say the HDL hypothesis is on the ropes right now,” said Dr. James
A. de Lemos, a professor at the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, who was not involved in the study.
Dr. Michael Lauer, director of the division of cardiovascular sciences
at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, agreed.
“The current study tells us that when it comes to HDL we should
seriously consider going back to the drawing board, in this case
meaning back to the laboratory,” said Dr. Lauer, who also was not
connected to the research. “We need to encourage basic laboratory
scientists to figure out where HDL fits in the puzzle — just what
exactly is it a marker for.”
But Dr. Steven Nissen, chairman of cardiovascular medicine at the
Cleveland Clinic, who is helping conduct studies of HDL-raising drugs,
said he remained hopeful. HDL is complex, he said, and it is possible
that some types of HDL molecules might in fact protect against heart
disease.
“I am an optimist,” Dr. Nissen said.
The study’s authors emphasize that they are not questioning the well-
documented finding that higher HDL levels are associated with lower
heart disease risk. But the relationship may not be causative. Many
assumed it was because the association was so strong and consistent.
Researchers also had a hypothesis to explain how HDL might work. From
studies with mice and with cells grown in the laboratory, they
proposed that HDL ferried cholesterol out of arteries where it did not
belong.
Now it seems that instead of directly reducing heart disease risk,
high HDL levels may be a sign that something else is going on that
makes heart disease less likely. To investigate the relationship
between HDL and cardiovascular risk, the researchers, led by Dr. Sekar
Kathiresan, director of preventive cardiology at Massachusetts General
Hospital and a geneticist at the Broad Institute of M.I.T. and
Harvard, used a method known as Mendelian randomization. It is a study
design that has recently become feasible with the advent of quick and
lower-cost genetic analyses.
The idea is that people inherit any of a wide variety of genetic
variations that determine how much HDL they produce. The result is
that people are naturally and randomly assigned by these variations in
their inherited genes to make more, or less, HDL, throughout their
lives. If HDL reduces the risk of heart disease, then those who make
more should be at lower risk.
For purposes of comparison, the researchers also examined inherited
variations in 13 genes that determine levels of LDL, the so-called bad
cholesterol. It is well known and widely accepted that lowering LDL
levels by any means — diet and exercise, statin drugs — reduces risk.
Clinical trials with statins established with certainty that reducing
LDL levels is protective. So, the researchers asked, did people who
inherited gene variations that affected their LDL levels, have
correspondingly higher or lower heart disease risk?
The study found, as expected, that gene variations that raise LDL
increase risk and those that lower LDL decrease risk. The gene effects
often were tiny, altering LDL levels by only a few percent. But the
data, involving tens of thousands of people, clearly showed effects on
risk.
“That speaks to how powerful LDL is,” Dr. Kathiresan said.
But the HDL story was very different. First the investigators looked
at variations in a well-known gene, endothelial lipase, that affects
only HDL. About 2.6 percent of the population has a variation in that
gene that raises their HDL levels by about 6 points. The investigators
looked at 116,000 people, asking if they had the variant and if those
who carried the HDL-raising variant had lower risk for heart disease.
“We found absolutely no association between the HDL-boosting variant
and risk for heart disease,” Dr. Kathiresan said. “That was very
surprising to us.”
Then they looked at a group of 14 gene variants that also affect HDL
levels, asking if there was a relationship between these variants and
risk for heart disease. The data included genetic data on 53,500
people. Once again, there was no association between having the
variants that increased HDL and risk of heart disease.
Dr. Lauer explains what that means with an analogy.
“One might think of a highway accident that causes a massive traffic
jam,” he said. “Stewing in the jam many miles away, I might be tempted
to strike the sign that says ‘accident ahead,’ but that won’t do any
good. The ‘accident-ahead’ sign is not the cause of the traffic jam —
the accident is. Analogously, targeting HDL won’t help if it’s merely
a sign.”
Dr. Kathiresan said there were many things HDL might indicate. “The
number of factors that track with low HDL is a mile long,” he said.
“Obesity, being sedentary, smoking, insulin resistance, having small
LDL particles, having increased cholesterol in remnant particles, and
having increased amounts of coagulation factors in the blood,” he
said. “Our hypothesis is that much of the association may be due to
these other factors.”
“I often see patients in the clinic with low HDL levels who ask how
they can raise it,” Dr. Kathiresan said. “I tell them, ‘It means you
are at increased risk, but I don’t know if raising it will affect your
risk.’ ”
That often does not go over well, he added. The notion that HDL is
protective is so entrenched that the study’s conclusions may prove
hard to accept, he and other researchers said.
“When people see numbers in the abnormal range they want to do
something about it,” Dr. Kathiresan said. “It is very hard to get
across the concept that the safest thing might be to leave people
alone.”
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: May 16, 2012
Because of an editing error, a correction with an earlier version of
this article was appended mistakenly, and described niacin
incorrectly. While niacin is a vitamin, as the correction noted, it is
considered a drug when given at pharmaceutical doses, as in a recent
trial in which it was shown to raise HDL without lowering heart
disease risk.
<snip>
ONE BAD guy is antibiotics....yikes..
Azithromycin -- aka --> Zithromax
KILLS Good gut bugs...and the BAD ones.
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/antibiotic-linked-rare-deadly-heart-risk-exchange-zithromax-azithromycin-doctors-article-1.1080016
Zithromax linked with rare but deadly heart risk; Expensive antibiotic
used to treat bronchitis, sinus infections and pneumonia
Results suggests doctors should prescribe other options for patients
with heart problems
Zithromax, or azithromycin, is more expensive than other antibiotics,
but it's popular because it often can be taken for fewer days. But the
results suggest doctors should prescribe other options for people
already prone to heart problems, the researchers and other experts
said.
Read more:
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/antibiotic-linked-rare-deadly-heart-risk-exchange-zithromax-azithromycin-doctors-article-1.1080016#ixzz1vAH6eKl4
An antibiotic widely used for bronchitis and other common infections
seems to increase chances for sudden deadly heart problems, a rare but
surprising risk found in a 14-year study.
Zithromax, or azithromycin, is more expensive than other antibiotics,
but it's popular because it often can be taken for fewer days. But the
results suggest doctors should prescribe other options for people
already prone to heart problems, the researchers and other experts
said.
Vanderbilt University researchers analyzed health records and data on
millions of prescriptions for several antibiotics given to about
540,000 Tennessee Medicaid patients from 1992 to 2006. There were 29
heart-related deaths among those who took Zithromax during five days
of treatment. Their risk of death while taking the drug was more than
double that of patients on another antibiotic, amoxicillin, or those
who took none.
To compare risks, the researchers calculated that the number of deaths
per 1 million courses of antibiotics would be about 85 among Zithromax
patients versus 32 among amoxicillin patients and 30 among those on no
antibiotics. The highest risks were in Zithromax patients with
existing heart problems.
Patients in each group started out with comparable risks for heart
trouble, the researchers said.
The results suggest there would be 47 extra heart-related deaths per 1
million courses of treatment with Zithromax, compared with
amoxicillin. A usual treatment course for Zithromax is about five
days, versus about 10 days for amoxicillin and other antibiotics.
Zithromax is at least twice as expensive as generic amoxicillin;
online prescription drug sellers charge a few dollars per pill for
Zithromax.
"People need to recognize that the overall risk is low," said Dr.
Harlan Krumholz, a Yale University health outcomes specialist who was
not involved in the study. More research is needed to confirm the
findings, but still, he said patients with heart disease "should
probably be steered away" from Zithromax for now.
The study appears in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine. The
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute helped pay for the research.
Zithromax, marketed by Pfizer Inc., has been available in the United
States for two decades. It's often used to treat bronchitis, sinus
infections and pneumonia. Wayne Ray, a Vanderbilt professor of
medicine, decided to study the drug's risks because of evidence
linking it with potential heart rhythm problems. Also, antibiotics in
the same class as Zithromax have been linked with sudden cardiac
death.
Zithromax is among top-selling antibiotics. U.S. sales last year
totaled $464 million, according to IMS Health, a health care
information and services company.
Pfizer issued a statement saying it would thoroughly review the study.
"Patient safety is of the utmost importance to Pfizer and we
continuously monitor the safety and efficacy of our products to ensure
that the benefits and risks are accurately described," the company
said.
Patients studied were age 50 on average and not hospitalized. Most had
common ailments, including sinus infections and bronchitis. Those on
Zithromax were about as healthy as those on other antibiotics, making
it unlikely that an underlying condition might explain the increased
death risk.
Medicaid patients generally have more disability and lower incomes
than other patients, so whether the same results would be found in the
general population is uncertain, Ray said.
Dr. Bruce Psaty, a professor of medicine at the University of
Washington, said doctors and patients need to know about the potential
risks. He said the results also raise concerns about long-term use of
Zithromax, which other research suggests could benefit people with
severe lung disease. Additional research is needed to determine if
that kind of use could be dangerous, he said.
<snip>
I know... obama has half white and half BLACK gut flora...
But, but, butt hole randall tar baby smells like...
that is rascist!
No it isn't.
We all can trace our DNA baracka to mitochondrial EVE.
To barack obama you say?
Yes... he's become .... well... white and nerdy living in the white
house.
NO way, jose!
Yes, id squid... he is... sadly to white and bush like..
He's almost 65% a bush clone now...
which btw, makes him white and nerdy...
Here look:
"Weird Al" Yankovic - White & Nerdy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9qYF9DZPdw
<views: 70,578,139> <2:51 time>
Dang... good thing he's only HALF white... LOL
But being BLACK and turdy is also nerdy!
Will he do the putney swope walk out?
Will barack say REVEREND Wright was right about God DAMN AMERICA?
Long excerpt of Wright's "God Damn America" speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV-oI__bHA4
63 hits on youtube for: god damn amerika! from revey pooh wrigh:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=reverend+wright+god+damn+america+speech&oq=reverend+wright+god+damn+america+speech&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=youtube.12...0.0.0.18260.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0.
Maybe Obama's god is allahu akbar?
I don't mind... but be real and tell the truth?
Allahu Akbar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUs2iRftp-s
They could update their music to rap?
Might bring in more converts?
Who was... it that i loved so much..?
Oh, oh, it's CAT Steven's.. he's gone Allahu Akbar for a LONG time
now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_Stevens
Yusuf Islam (born Steven Demetre Georgiou, 21 July 1948), commonly
known by his former stage name Cat Stevens, is an English singer-
songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, educator, philanthropist, and
prominent convert to Islam.[3]
<snip>
Should i read:
The Amateur
Edward Klein (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/The-Amateur-Edward-Klein/dp/1596987855
[...] Editorial Reviews
From the Inside Flap
Think you know the real Barack Obama? You don’t—not until you’ve read
The Amateur
In this stunning exposé, bestselling author Edward Klein—a
contributing editor to Vanity Fair, former foreign editor of Newsweek,
and former editor-in-chief of the New York Times Magazine—pulls back
the curtain on one of the most secretive White Houses in history. He
reveals a callow, thin-skinned, arrogant president with messianic
dreams of grandeur supported by a cast of true-believers, all of them
united by leftist politics and an amateurish understanding of
executive leadership.
In The Amateur you’ll discover:
Why the so-called “centrist” Obama is actually in revolt against the
values of the society he was elected to lead
Why Bill Clinton loathes Barack Obama and tried to get Hillary to run
against him in 2012
The spiteful rivalry between Michelle Obama and Oprah Winfrey
How Obama split the Kennedy family
How Obama has taken more of a personal role in making foreign policy
than any president since Richard Nixon—with disastrous results
How Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett are the real powers behind the
White House throne
The Amateur is a reporter’s book, buttressed by nearly 200 interviews,
many of them with the insiders who know Obama best. The result is the
most important political book of the year. You will never look at
Barack Obama the same way again.
From the Back Cover
Praise for The Amateur
“The Amateur is the best book I’ve read on how Barack Obama is
wrecking our country. I urge everyone who cares about America to read
Edward Klein’s eye-opening book.”
—Donald J. Trump, world-famous businessman, owner and host of the hit
NBC TV shows The Apprentice and Celebrity Apprentice, and bestselling
author of many titles, including Time to Get Tough: Making America #1
Again
“This is a racy, entertaining, informative book that illuminates
aspects of Obama and his team that have not been previously reported.
A necessary antidote to the Obama worship that is sure to characterize
the election debate.”
—Dinesh D’Souza, president of The King’s College and bestselling
author of The Roots of Obama’s Rage
“All the horrors I predicted in Welcome to Obamaland have now been
definitively proven true by Edward Klein’s rip-roaringly readable new
book The Amateur, which uses great stories and great reporting to
illustrate just how ideological, arrogant, and hapless Obama and his
administration really are. An outstanding demolition job on the most
overrated president of our time.”
—James Delingpole, columnist for the Daily Telegraph and the Spectator
and author of Welcome to Obamaland
“A devastating indictment of the lethal combination of incompetence
and radicalism that has made Obama into one of the worst presidents in
American history.”
—Norman Podhoretz, former editor of Commentary magazine and author of
many books, including most recently, Why Are Jews Liberals?
<snip>
Does Barack and the girls get off on :::
Wild World - Cat Stevens
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_0U3DlLFSU
Or how about the crap in the cradle?
Cat Stevens - Cat's in the cradle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSwL9deXNW8&feature=related
I'm going to BE like glue .... or sniff it.. and be a demodork
and give money to soros... so he can drill off of anywhere and screw
america.
So obama is a jerk off!
Hey!
Id squid!!!... stop that... we don't know if he's a jerk off.
Geez... just look at moooooooooooooo....chels big behind.
Isn't that a rap tap tip tap pit pat thingy pooh?
So it's ok, right?
Sir Mix-A-Lot - Baby Got Back (I Like Big Butts)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reTx5sqvVJ4
<4:16> <1.233 million views>
Done for kids:
Spongebob and friends - I LIKE BIG BUTTS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-K-dgZneR4&feature=related
Wow... reaL art!
No wonder her butt is bigger pigger then tax crack power
hungry ...YKW...
No?
Who?
Whose on 1st....
What's on 2nd!
and if ykw has a second germ we're screwed....
But ykw wants us to believe it's already to late..
oh?
yes.. power hungry bitch... LOL
Got's to spend that $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ on your USofA credit card...LOL
or what?
We don't have a haPPy paPPy craPPy preezy?
randall... so what ski? is he done ski? Will he ski... suck ski? on
a luau ski?
0 new messages