Why did you pick a BIPOLAR woman to
marry and make BABIES with, Dan?
Do you think normal men choose to marry
and make babies with such women?
She didn't deceive you at all, did she, Dan?
You've been very condemning and dismissive
of Kathleen with a brain disease considering
that you married and made BABIES with
a BIPOLAR woman.
Were you that condemning and dismissive
with your ex-wife when you married her
and made BABIES with her?
You said you want me to send you these
questions in paper form, as in a written
deposition or interrogatory.
You've been very good at asking questions
but not very good at answering logical
questions about your own statements.
Why is that, Dan?
>Dan Sullivan, At what point in your marriage
>to your ex did you know she was bipolar?
>Before you married her?
He would have needed to know before marriage. One would have to
be stupid beyond belief not to see the signs before marriage was a
realistic option in the relationship.
>Before your first baby was born with her?
>Before your second baby was born with her?
>
>Why did you pick a BIPOLAR woman to
>marry and make BABIES with, Dan?
>
The heart wants what the heart wants.
>Do you think normal men choose to marry
>and make babies with such women?
>
>She didn't deceive you at all, did she, Dan?
>
>You've been very condemning and dismissive
>of Kathleen with a brain disease considering
>that you married and made BABIES with
>a BIPOLAR woman.
You've already admitted, by YOUR standards, that you LIED about
any condemning posts from Dan regarding Kathleen.
>
>Were you that condemning and dismissive
>with your ex-wife when you married her
>and made BABIES with her?
>
>You said you want me to send you these
>questions in paper form, as in a written
>deposition or interrogatory.
Again I ask, and again you'll HIDE, when did Dan state that?
Please post the MID and/or Google link to just one such post.
>
>You've been very good at asking questions
>but not very good at answering logical
>questions about your own statements.
>
Actually, Dan answers most of your questions. You then ask them
multiple times after, further exposing your psychological INABILITY to
be honest with any intent.
>Why is that, Dan?
It's unlikely Dan will be able to explain why your self admitted
mental illness (according to you, only the mentally ill can marry the
mentally ill) forces you do lie.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
As of Saturday, March 27, 2010:
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him from Ed Polkers. There is nothing to even suggest any of the
money legally owed has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely
expired, but Greg still can't risk getting a job due to it.
As of Saturday, March 27, 2010:
Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.
Me: Hey, he used your standards.
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic
reasoning.
Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic.
Yes.
> You've been very good at asking questions
> but not very good at answering logical
> questions about your own statements.
>
> Why is that, Dan?
Your questions rarely are logical.
KBW > He would have needed to know before
KBW > marriage. One would have to be stupid
KBW > beyond belief not to see the signs before
KBW > marriage was a realistic option in the relationship.
Dan, If Kent was your attorney, would you fire him?
Another question from grag completely without logic.
Where does your drug addled mind see a legal matter in my
comment? Please be specific.
By the time I was done cross examining him he
was blushing and red faced.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/024b0d7413bba9fa
G > Dan, If Kent was your attorney, would you fire him?
DJS3 > Another question from grag completely without logic.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/5ac50ac8a14e3303
G > You said you want me to send you these
G > questions in paper form, as in a written
G > deposition or interrogatory.
DJS3 > Yes.
G > You've been very good at asking questions
G > but not very good at answering logical
G > questions about your own statements.
G >
G > Why is that, Dan?
DJS3 > Your questions rarely are logical.
Which of the below questions are illogical, Dan?
Please be precise.
Dan Sullivan, At what point in your marriage
to your ex did you know she was bipolar?
Before you married her?
Before your first baby was born with her?
Before your second baby was born with her?
Why did you pick a BIPOLAR woman to
marry and make BABIES with, Dan?
Do you think normal men choose to marry
and make babies with such women?
She didn't deceive you at all, did she, Dan?
You've been very condemning and dismissive
of Kathleen with a brain disease considering
that you married and made BABIES with
a BIPOLAR woman.
Were you that condemning and dismissive
with your ex-wife when you married her
and made BABIES with her?
You said you want me to send you these
questions in paper form, as in a written
deposition or interrogatory.
You've been very good at asking questions
>A caseworker once claimed that e-mails we sent were irrational.
If you authored them, they likely were.
>That didn't go well for him on the witness stand.
>
>By the time I was done cross examining him he
>was blushing and red faced.
>
So you claim. Prove it, unless you wish to admit, by YOUR
standards, it's another of your drug induced lies.
The following appears NOWHERE in the post to which you replied,
Greg.
What is the SPECIFIC reason you are compelled to be dishonest in
EVERY post, Greg?
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/024b0d7413bba9fa
>
>G > Dan, If Kent was your attorney, would you fire him?
>
>DJS3 > Another question from grag completely without logic.
>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/024b0d7413bba9fa
G > Dan, If Kent was your attorney, would you fire him?
DJS3 > Another question from grag completely without logic.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/5ac50ac8a14e3303
> G > You said you want me to send you these
> G > questions in paper form, as in a written
> G > deposition or interrogatory.
>
> DJS3 > Yes.
>
> G > You've been very good at asking questions
> G > but not very good at answering logical
> G > questions about your own statements.
> G >
> G > Why is that, Dan?
DJS3 > Your questions rarely are logical.
G > Which of the below questions are illogical, Dan?
G > Please be precise.
>
> G > Dan, If Kent was your attorney, would you fire him?
>
> DJS3 > Another question from grag completely without logic.
>
>
> > G > You said you want me to send you these
> > G > questions in paper form, as in a written
> > G > deposition or interrogatory.
>
> > DJS3 > Yes.
>
> > G > You've been very good at asking questions
> > G > but not very good at answering logical
> > G > questions about your own statements.
> > G >
> > G > Why is that, Dan?
DJS3 > Your questions rarely are logical.
G > Which of the below questions are illogical, Dan?
G > Please be precise.
G > Dan Sullivan, At what point in your marriage
G > to your ex did you know she was bipolar?
G > Before you married her?
G > Before your first baby was born with her?
G > Before your second baby was born with her?
G >
G > Why did you pick a BIPOLAR woman to
G > marry and make BABIES with, Dan?
G >
G > Do you think normal men choose to marry
G > and make babies with such women?
G >
G > She didn't deceive you at all, did she, Dan?
G >
G > You've been very condemning and dismissive
G > of Kathleen with a brain disease considering
G > that you married and made BABIES with
G > a BIPOLAR woman.
G >
G > Were you that condemning and dismissive
G > with your ex-wife when you married her
G > and made BABIES with her?
G >
G > You said you want me to send you these
G > questions in paper form, as in a written
G > deposition or interrogatory.
G >
G > You've been very good at asking questions
G > but not very good at answering logical
G > questions about your own statements.
G > Why is that, Dan?
< Dan CHOKED and ran away. >
Since the questions have already been answered, the matter is
really why you are COMPELLED to keep asking. A matter you've ALWAYS
chosen to run and HIDE from rather than address.
Keywords: Gregory Scott Hanson, Lisa Rene Watkins, Kristen Watkins,
Tom Watkins, child abuse, OWI, child molestation, drugs, Greg Hanson,
felony, sexual assault, Donna Joann Hanson, Sandra Lyn Freese, Sandy
Freese, spousal abuse, greegor47, wife beater, sexual assault, James E
Hanson, Jim Hanson, Jimmy Hanson, Kris Watkins
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson:
Why is that, Dan?
Why did you RUN AWAY from
answering these questions, Dan?
KEYWORDS:
Gregory Scott Hanson, Lisa Rene Watkins, Kristen Watkins, Tom Watkins,
child abuse, OWI, child molestation, drugs, Greg Hanson, felony,
sexual assault, Donna Joann Hanson, Sandra Lyn Freese, Sandy Freese,
spousal abuse, greegor47, wife beater, sexual assault, James E Hanson,
Jim Hanson, Jimmy Hanson, Kris Watkins
>Dan Sullivan, At what point in your marriage
>to your ex did you know she was bipolar?
[...]
In understand your life sucks so much you really don't want to be
Gregory Scott Hanson, but you're stuck with being Gregory Scott
Hanson, loser.
Replying to yourself and calling yourself Dan only serves to
further PROVE how desperate you are to escape the wretched life you've
made for yourself.
You are stupid.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
Dan skipped this thread, posting elsewhere but not here.
Dan is avoiding this thread and running away from the questions.
After years of grilling others, Dan won't answer like they did.
Dan is a chicken shit.