Gregory Scott Hanson DOB 05/22/1959, 1071 F Ave NW Cedar Rapids, IA 52405 has two convictions for abusing his mentally ill wife, AND he's on the Iowa State Child Abuse Registry.
Dan Sullivan
Greegor
> HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
You REALLY should get an actual case update
from a real caseworker, Dan.
I told you that you would not believe it if I told you!
Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
You can't verify that, of course.
For one thing, every investigation is on the registry.
This means that you are on your state's registry for all 20.
Is that why you revised UP your claim for your number
of investigations from 15 to 20?
Did you obtain your own registry report from NY, Dan?
Several of your claims are false and I've told you so.
You want to make a BIG DEAL out of my
15 year old misdemeanors while glossing over
a TWO TIME felon and worse in your midst.
Given that, among other things, you lack any
moral high ground regarding my misdemeanors,
It's just another way that you resemble
CPS caseworkers.
Dan Sullivan
> On Jul 22, 7:52 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
>
> You REALLY should get an actual case update
> from a real caseworker, Dan.
> I told you that you would not believe it if I told you!
Scan the paperwork and post it on photobucket.
> Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
> and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
> later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
>
> You can't verify that, of course.
You can't prove it's not true.
> For one thing, every investigation is on the registry.
> This means that you are on your state's registry for all 20.
Wrong.
> Is that why you revised UP your claim for your number
> of investigations from 15 to 20?
>
> Did you obtain your own registry report from NY, Dan?
>
> Several of your claims are false and I've told you so.
>
> You want to make a BIG DEAL out of my
> 15 year old misdemeanors while glossing over
> a TWO TIME felon and worse in your midst.
You are a child abusing pervert with a long history of abusing women
and little girls, grag.
> Given that, among other things, you lack any
> moral high ground regarding my misdemeanors,
Which other things?
> It's just another way that you resemble
> CPS caseworkers.
You resemble Joel Steinberg, Gregory Scott Hanson DOB 05/22/1959, 1071
F Ave NW Cedar Rapids, IA 52405
Zero.Cool
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:b6d4821c-c363-4453...@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
All the little girls. It's been proved that he only wants little girls for
his sexual release.
I bet he has hundreds of kiddy porn pictures on his computer and stored on
disks.
Zero.Cool
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:b6d4821c-c363-4453...@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
All the little girls. It's been proved that he only wants little girls for
Zero Cool
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:de7b54fe-2203-49c2...@h21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 22, 7:52 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>> HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
>
>You REALLY should get an actual case update
>from a real caseworker, Dan.
>I told you that you would not believe it if I told you!
>
>Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
>and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
>later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
>
>You can't verify that, of course.
Verify that you are really on Iowa's Child Abuse registry. I agree with
others who have stated you've been lying in an efforct to get those who are
dealing with DHFS to trust you.
>
>For one thing, every investigation is on the registry.
>This means that you are on your state's registry for all 20.
Not if it's determined to be unfounded.
>
>Is that why you revised UP your claim for your number
>of investigations from 15 to 20?
That was you who uped the number.
>
>Did you obtain your own registry report from NY, Dan?
>
>Several of your claims are false and I've told you so.
All of your claims are lies. Nearly all have been proven so.
>
>You want to make a BIG DEAL out of my
>15 year old misdemeanors while glossing over
>a TWO TIME felon and worse in your midst.
You beat up your wife.
Why did she run into the door three times (I've read the report)? Why did
she frequently trip and fall down the stairs (read those too)? How was she
able to spill boiling water on herself so many timesb (Yep, read them as
well)?
Go ahead, Greg. Lie and claim the incidents never occured. I'm making the
formal request that you lie.
>
>Given that, among other things, you lack any
>moral high ground regarding my misdemeanors,
>
You beat up your wife. Many times. You were only convicted of beating her
twice.
>It's just another way that you resemble
>CPS caseworkers.
You would know. You claim specific knowledge of their training manual.
Something that, occording to you, only a DHFS could know.
Greegor
G > You REALLY should get an actual case update
G > from a real caseworker, Dan.
G > I told you that you would not believe it if I told you!
DS > Scan the paperwork and post it on photobucket.
You first, Dan.
G > Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
G > and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
G > later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
G >
G > You can't verify that, of course.
DS > You can't prove it's not true.
You can't prove that despite all of those
investigations you were cleared.
G > For one thing, every investigation is on the registry.
G > This means that you are on your state's registry for all 20.
DS > Wrong.
You didn't know that UNFOUNDEDS also go on the registry?
G > Is that why you revised UP your claim for your number
G > of investigations from 15 to 20?
G >
G > Did you obtain your own registry report from NY, Dan?
G >
G > Several of your claims are false and I've told you so.
G >
G > You want to make a BIG DEAL out of my
G > 15 year old misdemeanors while glossing over
G > a TWO TIME felon and worse in your midst.
DS > You are a child abusing pervert with a long history
DS > of abusing women and little girls, grag.
Two misdemeanors.
You haven't gotten much right yet, Dan.
Whipping up half truths doesn't help you the way you think.
You dispensed your genius advice to file an
EMERGENCY motion for a hearing, with
nothing legally qualified as an emergency.
And the attorney who filed it MISTAKENLY
didn't keep the EMERGENCY disignation.
How DARE they overrule YOUR practice of law in NY!
Right Dan?
Freakin' TWENTY Child Abuse investigations and
you used "Where there's smoke, there's fire." on
somebody ELSE??
How smart was that?
TWENTY Child Abuse reports and you're an angel.
What kind of photographer are you?
G > Given that, among other things, you lack any
G > moral high ground regarding my misdemeanors,
DS > Which other things?
G > It's just another way that you resemble
G > CPS caseworkers.
DS > You resemble Joel Steinberg, Gregory Scott Hanson
DS > DOB 05/22/1959, 1071 F Ave NW Cedar Rapids, IA 52405
Now I'm an East Coast lawyer who illegally adopted a kid and killed
her?
Dan once had a BIPOLAR wife, so did Greg.
Dan made BABIES with his freakin' mental case! Greg did not.
Child Abuse investigations? Dan Sullivan : 20 Greg: 2
How long did Dan stay with his mental case wife? YEARS
Long enough to make several BABIES!
How long did Greg stay with his mental case wife? Months
So HOW is it that Dan pretends he is so superior?
Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/52b49e5611d619ea
April 2004 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d15f8e338226b780
July 2007 "My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26b08f9f2b9
G > Are these accurate quotes, Dan?
DS > Are the words "puppet bear condom" in any of my posts you quoted,
grag?
Dan Sullivan
> DS > HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
>
> G > You REALLY should get an actual case update
> G > from a real caseworker, Dan.
> G > I told you that you would not believe it if I told you!
>
> DS > Scan the paperwork and post it on photobucket.
>
> You first, Dan.
>
> G > Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
> G > and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
> G > later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
> G >
> G > You can't verify that, of course.
>
> DS > You can't prove it's not true.
>
> You can't prove that despite all of those
> investigations you were cleared.
You can't prove I was ever investigated once, right, grag?
> G > For one thing, every investigation is on the registry.
> G > This means that you are on your state's registry for all 20.
>
> DS > Wrong.
>
> You didn't know that UNFOUNDEDS also go on the registry?
In New York?
Got proof of your claim, grag?
> G > Is that why you revised UP your claim for your number
> G > of investigations from 15 to 20?
> G >
> G > Did you obtain your own registry report from NY, Dan?
> G >
> G > Several of your claims are false and I've told you so.
> G >
> G > You want to make a BIG DEAL out of my
> G > 15 year old misdemeanors while glossing over
> G > a TWO TIME felon and worse in your midst.
>
> DS > You are a child abusing pervert with a long history
> DS > of abusing women and little girls, grag.
>
> Two misdemeanors.
>
> You haven't gotten much right yet, Dan.
> Whipping up half truths doesn't help you the way you think.
>
> You dispensed your genius advice to file an
> EMERGENCY motion for a hearing, with
> nothing legally qualified as an emergency.
What would qualify as an emergency in a Pennsylvania family court petition,
grag?
> And the attorney who filed it MISTAKENLY
> didn't keep the EMERGENCY disignation.
>
> How DARE they overrule YOUR practice of law in NY!
>
> Right Dan?
The little girl could have been back with her own family for her first
Christmas.
> Freakin' TWENTY Child Abuse investigations and
> you used "Where there's smoke, there's fire." on
> somebody ELSE??
YOU, grag!
> How smart was that?
Fits you like a glove.
Dan Sullivan
krp
>
> "Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ecd53147-fb28-4a3c...@a13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>> DS > HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
>>
>> G > You REALLY should get an actual case update
>> G > from a real caseworker, Dan.
>> G > I told you that you would not believe it if I told you!
>>
>> DS > Scan the paperwork and post it on photobucket.
>>
>> You first, Dan.
>>
>> G > Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
>> G > and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
>> G > later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
>> G >
>> G > You can't verify that, of course.
>>
>> DS > You can't prove it's not true.
>>
>> You can't prove that despite all of those
>> investigations you were cleared.
>
> You can't prove I was ever investigated once, right, grag?
That's so true. We only have YOUR word for it that it was 15+ times.
BUT - since you lie like a rug, nobody can "prove" you were ever
investigated for anything, Dan, especially since you don't use your REAL
name.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4a6e4210$0$10320$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:ecd53147-fb28-4a3c...@a13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> >> DS > HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
>
> >> G > You REALLY should get an actual case update
> >> G > from a real caseworker, Dan.
> >> G > I told you that you would not believe it if I told you!
>
> >> DS > Scan the paperwork and post it on photobucket.
>
> >> You first, Dan.
>
> >> G > Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
> >> G > and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
> >> G > later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
> >> G >
> >> G > You can't verify that, of course.
>
> >> DS > You can't prove it's not true.
>
> >> You can't prove that despite all of those
> >> investigations you were cleared.
>
> > You can't prove I was ever investigated once, right, grag?
>
> That's so true. We only have YOUR word for it that it was 15+ times.
> BUT - since you lie like a rug, nobody can "prove" you were ever
> investigated for anything, Dan, especially since you don't use your REAL
> name.
What is my real name, kenny boy?
Dan Sullivan
> On Jul 27, 11:03 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
>
> because Dan Sullivan's little girl said:
>
> Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> April 2004 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> July 2007 "My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26...
>
> G > Are these accurate quotes, Dan?
Those quotes are from a case worker who documented in the next
sentence that she didn't know what my daughter was trying to say.
The case worker resigned from government service.
The Judge threw the case out of court.
Greegor
G > You REALLY should get an actual case update
G > from a real caseworker, Dan.
G > I told you that you would not believe it if I told you!
DS > Scan the paperwork and post it on photobucket.
G > You first, Dan.
G > Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
G > and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
G > later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
G >
G > You can't verify that, of course.
DS > You can't prove it's not true.
G > You can't prove that despite all of those
G > investigations you were cleared.
DS > You can't prove I was ever investigated once, right, grag?
KRP > That's so true. We only have YOUR word
KRP > for it that it was 15+ times. BUT - since
KRP > you lie like a rug, nobody can "prove" you
KRP > were ever investigated for anything, Dan,
KRP > especially since you don't use your
KRP > REAL name.
Dan claimed 15+ and then for some reason more
recently claimed 20. Why do you suppose he
revised that number?
I'm thinking he got a report on himself and
found out that all of the unfoundeds live on.
krp
Today he said "NONE!" It seems that Danny's reality is whatever he
needs it to be at the moment.
krp
> >> G > Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
> >> G > and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
> >> G > later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
> >> G >
> >> G > You can't verify that, of course.
>
> >> DS > You can't prove it's not true.
>
> >> You can't prove that despite all of those
> >> investigations you were cleared.
>
> > You can't prove I was ever investigated once, right, grag?
> That's so true. We only have YOUR word for it that it was 15+ times.
> BUT - since you lie like a rug, nobody can "prove" you were ever
> investigated for anything, Dan, especially since you don't use your REAL
> name.
DJS> What is my real name, kenny boy?
It is certain that it is probably NOT "Dan Sullivan." What it REALLY is,
is anyone's guess. At this late date, I wonder if YOU even know any more.
But WHO really cares?
Dan Sullivan
"krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:%uIbm.1609$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:9ef720c0-bc3e-4519...@v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>
>> >> G > Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
>> >> G > and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
>> >> G > later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
>> >> G >
>> >> G > You can't verify that, of course.
>>
>> >> DS > You can't prove it's not true.
>>
>> >> You can't prove that despite all of those
>> >> investigations you were cleared.
>>
>> > You can't prove I was ever investigated once, right, grag?
>
>> That's so true. We only have YOUR word for it that it was 15+ times.
>> BUT - since you lie like a rug, nobody can "prove" you were ever
>> investigated for anything, Dan, especially since you don't use your REAL
>> name.
>
> DJS> What is my real name, kenny boy?
>
> It is certain that it is probably
"Certain that it is probably???"
Is that an absolute maybe, kenny boy???
> NOT "Dan Sullivan."
My name has been the same for decades.
> What it REALLY is, is anyone's guess.
That's the best you can do, kenny boy, GUESS?
So guess.
> At this late date, I wonder if YOU even know any more. But WHO really
> cares?
Evidently YOU care, kenny boy... I guess, certainly that is probably true,
wouldn't you say???
Dan Sullivan
> DS > HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
>
> G > Or near Patchogue on Long Island NY
> G > because Dan Sullivan's little girl said:
>
> Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
>
> April 2004 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
>
> July 2007 "My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
>
> G > Are these accurate quotes, Dan?
>
> DS > sentence that she didn't know what my daughter was trying to say.
> DS >
> DS > The case worker resigned from government service.
> DS >
> DS > The Judge threw the case out of court.
>
> Got PROOF?
Yes.
krp
>>> >> G > Dan, You have claimed that you had 20 investigations
>>> >> G > and you claimed that 5 of them were founded but
>>> >> G > later (you claim) that those were later unfounded.
>>> >> G >
>>> >> G > You can't verify that, of course.
>>>
>>> >> DS > You can't prove it's not true.
>>>
>>> >> You can't prove that despite all of those
>>> >> investigations you were cleared.
>>>
>>> > You can't prove I was ever investigated once, right, grag?
>>
>>> That's so true. We only have YOUR word for it that it was 15+ times.
>>> BUT - since you lie like a rug, nobody can "prove" you were ever
>>> investigated for anything, Dan, especially since you don't use your REAL
>>> name.
>>
>> DJS> What is my real name, kenny boy?
>>
>> It is certain that it is probably
> "Certain that it is probably???"
> Is that an absolute maybe, kenny boy???
Nothing is for certain for your convoluted crap, Danny. Reality seems to
drift between many alternate universes.
>> NOT "Dan Sullivan."
> My name has been the same for decades.
Whatever it REALLY is.
>> What it REALLY is, is anyone's guess.
> That's the best you can do, kenny boy, GUESS?
>
> So guess.
I kind of favor ELMER FUDD as your name.
krp
LET'S SEE IT!
Dan Sullivan
I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN, DADDY!!!"
Dan Sullivan
I'll show you right after you post scans of your "cum laude" diplomas on
photobucket, kenny boy.
krp
> I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN, DADDY!!!"
Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You reflect on
your parents and how they raised you. When you do things like this, you
prove that you can't debate me, so you have to attempt to get at me by using
a girl you believe to be my daughter. How desperate and how despicable. Do
you ever go to reconcilliation any more, Danny? What do you think a priest
would say if you confided doing this? Especially so sotally unrepentantly.
Perfect act of contrition? Lying your ass off in the confessional is a fast
lane ticket to the warm place, Danny.
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a702fa9$0$31276$607e...@cv.net...
>
>> I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN, DADDY!!!"
>
> Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You reflect on
> your parents and how they raised you. When you do things like this, you
> prove that you can't debate me,
YOU said my name was Elmer Fudd.
Is that what you're calling debate, kenny boy?
krp
>>> I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN, DADDY!!!"
>>
>> Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You reflect
>> on your parents and how they raised you. When you do things like this,
>> you prove that you can't debate me,
> YOU said my name was Elmer Fudd.
So in YOUR MIND calling you "Elmer Fudd" is FAR FAR FAR FAR WORSE than
your "MILD" retort? Is that it Danny? I have a feeling I was insulting Mr.
Fudd and maybe owe HIM an apology.
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a704d3c$0$22528$607e...@cv.net...
>
>>>> I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN, DADDY!!!"
>>>
>>> Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You reflect
>>> on your parents and how they raised you. When you do things like this,
>>> you prove that you can't debate me,
>
>> YOU said my name was Elmer Fudd.
>
> So in YOUR MIND calling you "Elmer Fudd" is FAR FAR FAR FAR WORSE than
> your "MILD" retort?
I didn't say that.
> Is that it Danny? I have a feeling I was insulting Mr. Fudd and maybe owe
> HIM an apology.
You want to apologize to a fictional character?
I hear he was the one who signed both of your "cum laude" college diplomas!
Greegor
G > Or near Patchogue on Long Island NY
G > because Dan Sullivan's little girl said:
Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/52b49e5611d619ea
April 2004 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d15f8e338226b780
July 2007 "My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26b08f9f2b9
G > Are these accurate quotes, Dan?
DS > Those quotes are from a case worker who documented in the next
DS > sentence that she didn't know what my daughter was trying to say.
DS >
DS > The case worker resigned from government service.
DS >
DS > The Judge threw the case out of court.
G > Got PROOF?
DS > Yes.
KRP > LET'S SEE IT!
G > Were all 20 investigations in Suffolk County, Dan?
G > What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
G > What year was that?
Didn't you say 1993? And wasn't KLS 3 years old then?
Dan Sullivan
Dan Sullivan
krp
>>>>> I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN, DADDY!!!"
>>>>
>>>> Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You reflect
>>>> on your parents and how they raised you. When you do things like this,
>>>> you prove that you can't debate me,
>>
>>> YOU said my name was Elmer Fudd.
>>
>> So in YOUR MIND calling you "Elmer Fudd" is FAR FAR FAR FAR WORSE than
>> your "MILD" retort?
> I didn't say that.
Really? You sure seem very pissed off, Danny.
>> Is that it Danny? I have a feeling I was insulting Mr. Fudd and maybe owe
>> HIM an apology.
> You want to apologize to a fictional character?
Okay, the comic book publishers.I am sure linking you to Elmer Fudd
would be considered a slur on their character.
krp
> DJS3 > HIDE all the little girls in Cedar Rapids, Iowa!!!!!
> G > Or near Patchogue on Long Island NY
> G > because Dan Sullivan's little girl said:
Is he still letting little kids play with his puppet bear condoms
when he models them for the kids?
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4a70573a$0$31262$607e...@cv.net...
>
>>>>>> I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN,
>>>>>> DADDY!!!"
>>>>>
>>>>> Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You
>>>>> reflect on your parents and how they raised you. When you do things
>>>>> like this, you prove that you can't debate me,
>>>
>>>> YOU said my name was Elmer Fudd.
>>>
>>> So in YOUR MIND calling you "Elmer Fudd" is FAR FAR FAR FAR WORSE
>>> than your "MILD" retort?
>
>> I didn't say that.
>
> Really? You sure seem very pissed off, Danny.
I made a simple denial, only four words.
freedom
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, krp <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:4a702fa9$0$31276$607e...@cv.net...
>
>> I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN, DADDY!!!"
>
> Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You reflect on
>your parents and how they raised you.
So, the fact that you raised your daughter to become a porn star, somehow
reflects on Dan's upbringing? Wow, talk about projection.
> When you do things like this, you
>prove that you can't debate me, so you have to attempt to get at me by using
>a girl you believe to be my daughter.
It is your daughter. You already confirmed this on your listserv.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's
Association or AN Y connection to them."
- --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
- --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to
claim that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services
**, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQCVAwUBSnDm4cWdjev37kExAQH2UgP9HdLS+bLSXtnDvsZy/g8ae/lRa/EtxuSd
j4CpWxn60Yl97g7n5ErCLi/Fo22b1U1h8EmMEnSySjX0d6Lkpmav81NRfV+PW+NB
6mNVEVjGrGcuvSjzA6DghWZrMF/ABGHRpPfc28Qp5kfwGN4K80JgFembg6QF+Uma
D71XeIxfe/I=
=4upc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Greegor
What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
What year was that?
whitevamp
Suzanne? MOMMY!!!
Sorry , had to do that since grag thinks my mother's name is
Suzanne. Man does he suck at online stalking.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
whitevamp
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
Elmer Fudd is not a " comic book" character Kennie. It is property of
Looney Tmes and Warner Brothers.
You claimed you needed to give Elmer Fudd an apology, He is a
fictional character, not a real being. If you are in an apologetic
mood, you'll have a very long list of real people you need to ask
their forgiveness for what you've done to them.
Try living in reality once in awhile Kennie.
whitevamp
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Looking for pointers grag in your abuse of female children?
whitevamp
Need help stalking , grag?
whitevamp
> On Jul 29, 2:30 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:4a70573a$0$31262$607e...@cv.net...
>
> > >>>>> I hear your pornstar daughter refers to you as "DO ME AGAIN, DADDY!!!"
>
> > >>>> Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You reflect
> > >>>> on your parents and how they raised you. When you do things like this,
> > >>>> you prove that you can't debate me,
>
> > >>> YOU said my name was Elmer Fudd.
>
> > >> So in YOUR MIND calling you "Elmer Fudd" is FAR FAR FAR FAR WORSE than
> > >> your "MILD" retort?
> > > I didn't say that.
>
> > Really? You sure seem very pissed off, Danny.
>
> > >> Is that it Danny? I have a feeling I was insulting Mr. Fudd and maybe owe
> > >> HIM an apology.
> > > You want to apologize to a fictional character?
>
> > Okay, the comic book publishers.I am sure linking you to Elmer Fudd
> > would be considered a slur on their character.
>
> Elmer Fudd is not a " comic book" character Kennie. It is property of
Typo corrected.
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:f955c3f370996480...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Sullivan - as ever you show just how LOW CLASS you are. You reflect
>> on
>>your parents and how they raised you.
> So, the fact that you raised your daughter to become a porn star, somehow
> reflects on Dan's upbringing? Wow, talk about projection.
Davey - I never raised ANYONE to do porn. That's an invention of your
sick minds.
Keywords: david daniel moore pathological liar, david daniel moore
calumet city, illinois, david daniel moore internet psychopath, Lotus,
david daniel moore stalker, stalker, real estate agents, david daniel moore
pathological liar, david daniel moore, pervert, abusive real estate agents,
david daniel moore coward, david daniel moore computer hacker,
david daniel moore criminal, internet stalkers david daniel moore,
internet harassment david daniel moore, david daniel moore, moore the porn
star,
internet libel, david daniel moore website of lies,janet moore,
850 buffalo avenue, calumet city,illinos, dui, linda boss, ACT, Lotus
Solutions consulting,
david daniel moore malicious use of employers computers, pedophilia,
david daniel moore sara lee corporation, never employ david
daniel moore, internet psychopaths, david daniel moore, david kojack, moore,
chicagoland pansies, internet addiction, internet stalking, woman hater,
tara moreland, janet more, dawn moore, alias dustin calloway, alias
david miller, alias david boss, alias jeff johnson, blackmailer, sexual
harassment,sexual blackmail, david moore bbs blackmail, david moore usmc, 29
palms california,linda boss, david moore child abuser, anonymous remailer
stalkers, anonymous remailer abusers, basement dwellers,off shore website,
new zealand, malaysia website,employer hotel/casino,computer abuse, office
disruption,
obsessive compulsive disorder, four winds,calumet city drag queen,
transvestite,
sexual disorders, mglf, milwaukee general liberation front,punks, putz,
bestiality,
cowardice, forger, mommys basement, skinheads, forgeries, willian rainey
harper college,
coalition forces, buffalo, michigan, david moore coalition supreme allied
commander,
anonymous remailer stalkers, david moore womanizer, david daniel moore drag
queen,
lotus programs, IT contractors, david d. moore aryan nations member.
Greegor
You said you would not hesitate.
What's the delay?
Greegor
What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
What year was that?
Didn't you say 1993? And wasn't KLS 3 years old then?
Moe > Need help stalking , Greg?
Is Dan afraid the former caseworker might explain it differently?
If Dan's daughter was 3 in 1993 she'd be 19, an adult now.
Dan told the Puppet Bear story as far back as 2002.
Was KLS really 12 years old when you started telling
that Puppet Bear story, Dan?
Dan Sullivan
> Were your 20 Child Abuse investigations all in Suffolk County, Dan?
> What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
> What year was that?
> Didn't you say 1993? And wasn't KLS 3 years old then?
>
> Moe > Need help stalking , Greg?
>
> Is Dan afraid the former caseworker might explain it differently?
Differently than the fact that she documented in the case record that
she didn't know what my daughter said?
Differently than the petition she filed in which she claimed my
daughter made disclosures to her and the detectives from the sex
crimes unit, when the detectives documented in their case record that
my daughter made no disclosures?
Greegor
because he's a freakin' mental case
Testy Testy! Nice try!
On Jul 30, 3:58 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 3:27 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Were your 20 Child Abuse investigations all in Suffolk County, Dan?
> > What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
> > What year was that?
> > Didn't you say 1993? And wasn't KLS 3 years old then?
>
Moe > Need help stalking , Greg?
G > Is Dan afraid the former caseworker might explain it differently?
DS > Differently than the fact that she
DS > documented in the case record that
DS > she didn't know what my daughter said?
DS >
DS > Differently than the petition she filed in
DS > which she claimed my daughter made
DS > disclosures to her and the detectives
DS > from the sex crimes unit, when the
DS > detectives documented in their case
DS > record that my daughter made no disclosures?
Got PROOF?
Were your 20 Child Abuse investigations all in Suffolk County, Dan?
What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
What year was that?
Didn't you say 1993? And wasn't KLS 3 years old then?
Come on, Dan, she's an adult now, right?
Didn't you say this took place in 1993 and she was 3?
Dan Sullivan
> Re: TG grag hanson never made babies with anyone
> because he's a freakin' mental case
>
> Testy Testy! Nice try!
>
> On Jul 30, 3:58 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:> On Jul 30, 3:27 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Were your 20 Child Abuse investigations all in Suffolk County, Dan?
> > > What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
> > > What year was that?
> > > Didn't you say 1993? And wasn't KLS 3 years old then?
>
> Moe > Need help stalking , Greg?
>
> G > Is Dan afraid the former caseworker might explain it differently?
>
> DS > Differently than the fact that she
> DS > documented in the case record that
> DS > she didn't know what my daughter said?
> DS >
> DS > Differently than the petition she filed in
> DS > which she claimed my daughter made
> DS > disclosures to her and the detectives
> DS > from the sex crimes unit, when the
> DS > detectives documented in their case
> DS > record that my daughter made no disclosures?
>
> Got PROOF?
Yes.
Greegor
DS > Yes.
Dan Sullivan
>G > Is Dan afraid the former caseworker might explain it differently?
>
> DS > Yes.
That wasn't the question I said "yes" to.
> Come on, Dan, she's an adult now, right?
The CPS caseworker?
I imagine she's about 40 by now.
> Didn't you say this took place in 1993 and she was 3?
I believe she was in her twenties.
Greegor
told the "Puppet Bear" story, and it was 1993.
Is that correct, Dan?
Dan Sullivan
> You claimed your daughter was 3 when she
> told the "Puppet Bear" story, and it was 1993.
>
> Is that correct, Dan?
No.
Greegor
G > told the "Puppet Bear" story, and it was 1993.
G > Is that correct, Dan?
DS > No.
What part of your story are you changing now, Dan?
mmrpurdue
I suspect greg cannot get an erection with an adult woman, either that
of his sperm is as lazy and stupid as greg himself.
Greegor
mmrpurdue
Greegor
G > told the "Puppet Bear" story, and it was 1993.
G > Is that correct, Dan?
> I suspect greg cannot get an erection with an adult woman, either that
> of his sperm is as lazy and stupid as greg himself.
KLS is 19 based on Dan's assertions.
Dan, Did the PUPPET BEAR thing come up in 1993?
Was your daughter, KLS really 3 then?
How do you explain reports that your daughter is 25 years old?
whitevamp
Cease and desist your online harassment and stalking of me Gregory
Hanson.
Greegor
G > You said you would not hesitate.
G > What's the delay?
Moe > Cease and desist your online harassment
Moe > and stalking of me Gregory Hanson.
Answer already posted
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/66b8f51fe86bdde3
Greegor
> G > You claimed your daughter was 3 when she
> G > told the "Puppet Bear" story, and it was 1993.
> G > Is that correct, Dan?
>
> > I suspect greg cannot get an erection with an adult woman, either that
> > of his sperm is as lazy and stupid as greg himself.
KLS is 19 based on Dan's assertions.
G > Dan, Did the PUPPET BEAR thing come up in 1993?
G > Was your daughter, KLS really 3 then?
G > How do you explain reports that your daughter is 25 years old?
Dan?
Greegor
G > told the "Puppet Bear" story, and it was 1993.
G > Is that correct, Dan?
[...]
G > Dan, Did the PUPPET BEAR thing come up in 1993?
G > Was your daughter, KLS really 3 then?
G > How do you explain reports that your daughter is 25 years old?
G > Dan?
Dan, YOU brought this up!
How old is KLS? 19 or 25?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/0df75fdb0a84e007
DS > Next grag will be claiming that someone is sending
DS > him reports about the age of your children.
Dan referred to children but he's talking about
his ADULT DAUGHTER, KLS, who as a child
was the victim of Dan's Puppet Bear condom.
Dan himself posted her statements several times.
Daniel J. Sullivan III (61), KLS (25) and SMS (60)
all live in Patchogue, NY. Dan claimed KLS was
3 when she made the Puppet Bear statements.
So, WHAT YEAR was KLS 3 years old?
And WHAT YEAR did Dan claim she was 3 years old?
Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/52b49e5611d619ea
April 2004 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d15f8e338226b780
July 2007 "My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26b08f9f2b9
Greegor
What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
What year was that?
Didn't you say 1993? And wasn't KLS 3 years old then?
Come on, Dan, she's an adult now, right?
Didn't you say this took place in 1993 and she was 3?
Feb 2002 "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
Dan Sullivan
>
> Were your 20 Child Abuse investigations all in Suffolk County, Dan?
>
> What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
Susan.
Greegor
Dan?
G > What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
DS > Susan.
Not your current wife, right?
Please put me in contact with the caseworker
that you supposedly caused to resign.
Come on, Dan, you BRAGGED about it for YEARS.
Let me verify your story!
Were your 20 Child Abuse investigations all in Suffolk County, Dan?
What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
Dan Sullivan
> G > Were your 20 Child Abuse investigations all in Suffolk County,
> Dan?
>
> G > What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
>
> DS > Susan.
>
> Not your current wife, right?
>
> Please put me in contact with the caseworker
> that you supposedly caused to resign.
I believe her email is su...@uranassholegrag.net
Greegor
G > What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
DS > Susan.
Not your current wife, right?
Please put me in contact with the caseworker
that you supposedly caused to resign.
DS > I believe her email is su...@uranassholegrag.net
I love you too, Dan!
Hey, Dan, Why did you use your wife's name?
Come on, Dan, you BRAGGED about it for YEARS,
how you were such a badass that the caseworker resigned.
Let me verify your story!
Were your 20 Child Abuse investigations all in Suffolk County, Dan?
What was the name of the caseworker who resigned?
Greegor
case where the caseworker got Dan's daughter to
tell the puppet bear story?
Dan VOLUNTEERED or BRAGGED about it
several times over the last 9 years.
But there's a wrinkle.
Dan's daughter KLS is 25 now, so in 1993 she
was not 3 as Dan claimed repeatedly and
voluntarily.
She would have been 9 years old in 1993.
Why can't Dan explain this?
Considering all of Dan's BRAGGING about
that case, isn't it fair and legitimate to
ask about such a contradiction?
Greegor
Don't worry, Dan.
Just ignore it and it will go away, right?
Dan Sullivan
KRP
GH> Don't worry, Dan. Just ignore it and it will go away, right?
How does this age deal work out?
Greegor
> G"Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
"The story doesn't change if you tell the truth"
isn't that what you said, Dan?
krp
GH> "The story doesn't change if you tell the truth"
GH> isn't that what you said, Dan?
I am still puzzled by the significant age discrepancy between the
different versions of Danny's stories. Almost 10 years.
I hear MACHO DUDE Danny is writing us usual behind the back sniping at
me in ASCPS. Such a BRAVE guy! And DANNY - I have NO connections to Mr.
Madoff no matter how loudly hysterical you get over it. You keep making
claims - MANY of them where I can't read them unless somebody crossposts
them because you are too much of a COWARD, Sullivan to say it to my face and
you KNOW I will expose you as a LIAR yet again.
krp
iron hand and abused anyone who took issue with his BULLSHIT. He handed our
EXTREMELY BAD legal advice to people designed to make them permanent victims
of the state. Danny and I started out with simple factual disagreements,
which evolved in his present level of HYSTERIA.
HYSTERIA:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hysteria
"Hysteria, in its colloquial use, describes a state of mind, one of
unmanageable fear or emotional excesses. The fear is often caused by
multiple events in one's past that involved some sort of severe conflict;
the fear can be centered on a body part or most commonly on an imagined
problem with that body part (disease is a common complaint). See also Body
dysmorphic disorder and Hypochondriasis. People who are "hysterical" often
lose self-control due to the overwhelming fear."
This can lead to malfunctions of various body parts, including a
tendency to urinate on themselevs.
"Psychiatrists and other physicians have in theory given up the use of
"hysteria", replacing it with more euphemistic terms that are essentially
synonyms. These include "psychosomatic", "functional", "nonorganic",
"psychogenic", and "medically unexplained". In 1980 the American Psychiatric
Association officially changed the diagnosis of "hysterical neurosis,
conversion type" to "conversion disorder". Hysteria also has significant
overlap with the diagnostic term "somatization disorder" and with somatoform
disorders in general."
http://www.answers.com/topic/hysteria
"Histrionic personality disorder has a prevalence of approximately 2-3% of
the general population. It begins in early adulthood and has been diagnosed
more frequently in women than in men. Histrionic personalities are typically
self-centered and attention seeking. They operate on emotion, rather than
fact or logic, and their conversation is full of generalizations and
dramatic appeals. While the patient's enthusiasm, flirtatious behavior, and
trusting nature may make them appear charming, their need for immediate
gratification, mercurial displays of emotion, and constant demand for
attention often alienates them from others."
This would include things like making claims about somebody else
IMPLYING the possession of factual knowledge of misdeeds of the "FEARED"
individual knowing that the person is not in the posession of ANY facts he
suggests he has whatsoever. Highly dramatic claims such as criminal acts
that are fabrications of the person (Sullivan) that are either the result of
wishful thinking or deliberate falsehoods. This includes making these
allegations often where the person he is accusing isn't likely to see them
or be able to respond to them.
In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but to make his attacks
where I can't see them unless somebody else crossposts them. Danny, above
all else NEEDS to be SAFE and in CONTROL. You see, for Sullivan "CONTROL" is
a dominating issue. It dictates his life. He NEEDS (psychologically) to
DOMINATE people and the environment around him. He NEEDS to be in CONTROL.
He reacts emotionally when his "CONTROL" is challenged usually with blind
rage that elevates into a lifelong vendetta. Hence the NEED to attempt to
destroy that object person by ANY means possible. Usually inuendos and
misrepresentations (distortions) or outright LIES. Most by SUGGESTION rather
than actually directly making the claims and placing them to the test of
TRUTH.
Dan Sullivan keeps on with his pattern of conduct largely because he is
a moral coward. He needs to tear others down in his twisted mind in order to
build himself up to his fantacized level of grandiosity. Her sees himself as
a GREAT and EXTREMELY IMPORTANT person. He has grand idea of his important
stature in the world. Yet his life is empty of ANY significant
accomplishments, which causes his FEAR of others who DO have noteworthy
accomplishments in life. Danny NEEDS to the level of desperation to sully
the reputation of anyone he percieves as a threat to his IMPORTANCE in the
community. He can't allow to others any level of significant accomplishments
because they pose a panic level threat to him.
Danny reacts the way he MUST. This is not a factor of his personality
over which Sullivan can muster much of ANY positive direction. He MUST
attack. It's not a choice for him. It is not possible for SUllivan to admit
being wrong no matter how PAINFULLY OBVIOUS his errors are. He just can't.
Such as his weeks long tirade claiming that I misued the word "Manifold" in
a sentence on my website and he inistsed the "PROPER" term was "MANYFOLD."
He was painfully wrong, but it has been impossible for him to admit it. He
HAS to be superior. He cannot admit ANY failing because he must present
himself as omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. He needs to have
sycophants to beleive that he is MORE infallible than either the Pope of
Christ Jesus. He draws strength from their adoration.
Sullivan makes MANY allegations that I am guilty of dozens of crimes and
types of fraud. He SUGGESTS that He has actual proof. He attempts to claim
that statistical references on the website are NOT TRUE. Yet, what has he
ever offered other than innuendo? NOTHING! He never will. Because all of
this is just the product of his HYSTERICAL MIND.
Dan Sullivan
grag claims the difference is six years.
In your message you increased the difference to ten years.
Why don't you write a version of my story and make the age discrepancy
100 years, kenny boy?
> I hear MACHO DUDE Danny is writing us usual behind the back sniping at
> me in ASCPS. Such a BRAVE guy!
My messages are public service announcements.
I don't care if you don't want to access my posts.
> And DANNY - I have NO connections to Mr.
> Madoff no matter how loudly hysterical you get over it.
You completely miss the point, shit-for-brains pangborn.
Madoff was brought to the attention of the authorities because his 1%
interest payoff every month was impossible.
As is your claim that more than 95% of your cases are dismissed prior
to trial.
As is your claim that you win when it goes to trial 98% of the time.
AND your claim that you win your clients "SOLE CUSTODY" 90% of the
time.
http://www.a-team.org/history.html
"We have built a track record where over 95% of our cases will be
dismissed prior to trial, and one where we win at trial in over 98% of
our cases. But more than that, we are able to win custody for over 90%
of our clients. Sole custody."
> You keep making
> claims - MANY of them where I can't read them
You can read them if you want to.
Take a ride to your local library.
Dan Sullivan
news:pFAlm.1142$FV4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
<<<snip kenny boy crying into his keyboard>>>
> In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but to make his attacks
> where I can't see them
You can read my messages if you go to your local library, kenny boy.
Greegor
G > family's case where the caseworker got Dan's
G > daughter to tell the puppet bear story?
G > Dan VOLUNTEERED or BRAGGED about it
G > several times over the last 9 years.
G > But there's a wrinkle.
G > Dan's daughter KLS is 25 now, so in 1993 she
G > was not 3 as Dan claimed repeatedly and
G > voluntarily.
G > She would have been 9 years old in 1993.
G > Why can't Dan explain this?
G > Considering all of Dan's BRAGGING about
G > that case, isn't it fair and legitimate to
G > ask about such a contradiction?
GH> Don't worry, Dan. Just ignore it and it will go away, right?
KRP > How does this age deal work out?
GH> "The story doesn't change if you tell the truth"
GH> isn't that what you said, Dan?
KRP > I am still puzzled by the significant age
KRP > discrepancy between the different
KRP > versions of Danny's stories. Almost 10 years.
Six years discrepancy.
If Dan's daughter was 3 years old in 1993 when she
made the Puppet Bear statement, she would be 19 now.
But KLS is 25 now.
Dan refuses to explain the discrepancy.
Dan's EGO drives him to dismiss his opponents
as criminals or villains same as famous criminals.
(But NOT his Garage Burglary felon cohort Kent Wills.)
Greegor
KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
DS > You can read my messages if you go to your local library, kenny
boy.
Dan tacitly admits defeat by using this backstabbing tactic.
Dan Sullivan
> G > Moe, Did you KNOW that Dan talked up his
> G > family's case where the caseworker got Dan's
> G > daughter to tell the puppet bear story?
>
> G > Dan VOLUNTEERED or BRAGGED about it
> G > several times over the last 9 years.
>
> G > But there's a wrinkle.
>
> G > Dan's daughter KLS is 25 now, so in 1993 she
> G > was not 3 as Dan claimed repeatedly and
> G > voluntarily.
>
> G > She would have been 9 years old in 1993.
>
> G > Why can't Dan explain this?
>
> G > Considering all of Dan's BRAGGING about
> G > that case, isn't it fair and legitimate to
> G > ask about such a contradiction?
>
> GH> Don't worry, Dan. Just ignore it and it will go away, right?
>
> KRP > How does this age deal work out?
>
> GH> "The story doesn't change if you tell the truth"
> GH> isn't that what you said, Dan?
>
> KRP > I am still puzzled by the significant age
> KRP > discrepancy between the different
> KRP > versions of Danny's stories. Almost 10 years.
>
> Six years discrepancy.
So you acknowledge that ken pangborn lied.
> If Dan's daughter was 3 years old in 1993 when she
> made the Puppet Bear statement, she would be 19 now.
My daughter didn't make a puppet bear statement.
Dan Sullivan
I do note, grag, that you admitted in another thread that kenny boy lied
about your six year figure by his claiming that it was ten years.
womanGoddess
And how many times have YOUR stories changed Kennie on a number of
subjects, like your AF "service"?
i BWAHAHAHAAHA!!!
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
womanGoddess
BADABOOOOOMMM!!!!
Aw shit my new irony meter exploded again.
womanGoddess
By that standard you and Kennie have admitted defeat numerous times.
krp
> DS > <<<snip kenny boy crying into his keyboard>>>
>
> KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
> KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
>
> DS > You can read my messages if you go to your local library, kenny
> boy.
And Danny you chickenshit, you can KISS MY ASS!!! YOU are the coward who
HAS to HIDE.
Dan Sullivan
My message are available to anyone on the computers at the public library,
kenny boy.
Are you really claiming that's HIDING from you???
womanGoddess
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
How can he be " hiding" if he's posting in usenet where anyone can
see what he posts.
Except you, supposedly. And your excuse of not being able to see alt
groups falls flat when you have alternatives where you CAN see alt
groups.
And odd how you SUPPOSEDLY can't read alt groups but you sure as hell
can POST to them, right Kenniepoo?
And I doubt Sullivan has such an affection for your extra wide
buttocks so your homoerotic offer to hum to kiss them would not
appeal to him.
But then grag like you enough to service both front and back of you.
Greegor
KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
DS > You can read my messages if you go
DS > to your local library, kenny boy.
G > Dan tacitly admits defeat by using this backstabbing tactic.
DS > I do note, grag, that you admitted in another
DS > thread that kenny boy lied about your six
DS > year figure by his claiming that it was ten years.
"Do note that" you stupid and gutless sissy.
Ken made a mistake and you want it to be a LIE.
Bringing it up in a different thread is kinda retarded as well.
But, then, you ARE Daniel J. Sullivan III, of Patchogue, NY.
Dan Sullivan
> DS > <<<snip kenny boy crying into his keyboard>>>
>
> KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
> KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
>
> DS > You can read my messages if you go
> DS > to your local library, kenny boy.
>
> G > Dan tacitly admits defeat by using this backstabbing tactic.
>
> DS > I do note, grag, that you admitted in another
> DS > thread that kenny boy lied about your six
> DS > year figure by his claiming that it was ten years.
>
> "Do note that" you stupid and gutless sissy.
>
> Ken made a mistake and you want it to be a LIE.
kenny boy subtracted 19 from 25 and you want everyone to believe he
made a mistake when he concluded the difference was TEN, even tho
you've posted the difference numerous times as SIX, grag????
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Aug 27, 4:24�pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:54a51750-3f3a-4dff...@d38g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > DS > �<<<snip kenny boy crying into his keyboard>>>
>>
>> > KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
>> > KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
>>
>> > DS > You can read my messages if you go to your local library, kenny
>> > boy.
>>
>> And Danny you chickenshit, you can KISS MY ASS!!! �YOU are the coward who
>> HAS to HIDE.
>
> How can he be " hiding" if he's posting in usenet where anyone can
>see what he posts.
Kenny-Bob doesn't want people to know he uses another server in
addition to Verison's. Sadly, he already proved he used it in one of
his racist posts.
>
> Except you, supposedly. And your excuse of not being able to see alt
>groups falls flat when you have alternatives where you CAN see alt
>groups.
Like the one he used to post the racist post. He screwed up and
left his name and E-mail address.
>
> And odd how you SUPPOSEDLY can't read alt groups but you sure as hell
>can POST to them, right Kenniepoo?
It's possible Verison permits posting to groups that it's banned.
I find it odd, but not impossible.
>
> And I doubt Sullivan has such an affection for your extra wide
>buttocks so your homoerotic offer to hum to kiss them would not
>appeal to him.
Pangborn always goes for the men he can't have. If he'd visit a
local gay bar, he'd enjoy more luck. But he keeps trying to get
heterosexual males.
>
> But then grag like you enough to service both front and back of you.
>
The evidence that Greg is gay is very weak. And I'm being kind
by giving it that much credence.
Kenny-Bob is gay. His own posts show that he lusts after David
Moore, going so far as to claim David is his gay lover at least once.
Other posts show Ken's obsession with homoerotic imagery.
He doesn't see his wife as human. Since she's a woman, she's a
thing (see sig).
That he's gay isn't a big deal, really. However, his constantly
expressing his desires for men who will never be interested is a
matter of some concern.
"It's attached to a thing called a "WIFE" Betty."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn showing how he views his wife
as an object and NOT a human being.
Message-ID: <KLf2j.31312$9h.4837@trnddc07>
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>> > Considering all of Dan's BRAGGING about
>> > that case, isn't it fair and legitimate to
>> > ask about such a contradiction?
>>
>> GH> Don't worry, Dan. Just ignore it and it will go away, right?
>>
>> How does this age deal work out?
>
>"The story doesn't change if you tell the truth"
>isn't that what you said, Dan?
And your stories constantly change, Greg.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Kent Wills
[...]
>> GH> Don't worry, Dan. Just ignore it and it will go away, right?
>>
>> How does this age deal work out?
>
>GH> "The story doesn't change if you tell the truth"
>GH> isn't that what you said, Dan?
>
> I am still puzzled by the significant age discrepancy between the
>different versions of Danny's stories. Almost 10 years.
>
> I hear MACHO DUDE Danny is writing us usual behind the back sniping at
>me in ASCPS. Such a BRAVE guy! And DANNY - I have NO connections to Mr.
>Madoff no matter how loudly hysterical you get over it. You keep making
>claims - MANY of them where I can't read them unless somebody crossposts
>them because you are too much of a COWARD, Sullivan to say it to my face and
>you KNOW I will expose you as a LIAR yet again.
Again? You've been UNABLE to support, let alone prove, your FACT
CLAIM that Dan has lied. In order to try, you must LIE about what
he's posted.
All you've ever managed to do is prove yourself the pathological
liar you are.
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, expressing
his fondness for child porn in
Message-ID:
<RECUi.494$Q%3.238@trnddc04>
Greegor
DS > thread that kenny boy lied about your six
DS > year figure by his claiming that it was ten years.
DS > kenny boy subtracted 19 from 25 and you
DS > want everyone to believe he made a mistake
DS > when he concluded the difference was TEN,
DS > even tho you've posted the difference
DS > numerous times as SIX, grag????
Raise your question in the right thread then, dumbass.
Dan Sullivan
This is the right thread, grag.
You just don't want to be responsible for proving ken pangborn to be a
liar.
And YOU are just as much a liar as you've proved pangborn to be
because you deleted your response to the first statement I made in the
message I'm responding to.
Hiding the facts don't make them untrue, grag, it just makes you a
fool.
Greegor
Dan Sullivan
Are you blind or stupid, grag?
Greegor
KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
DS > You can read my messages if you go
DS > to your local library, kenny boy.
G > Dan tacitly admits defeat by using this backstabbing tactic.
Moe > By that standard you and Kennie have admitted defeat numerous
times.
Where have I posted about Dan where Dan doesn't read it?
Tell me Moe, Will you go on record as asserting
that is a wise and honorable tactic for Dan to use?
Dan Sullivan
> DS > <<<snip kenny boy crying into his keyboard>>>
>
> KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
> KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
>
> DS > You can read my messages if you go
> DS > to your local library, kenny boy.
>
> G > Dan tacitly admits defeat by using this backstabbing tactic.
>
> Moe > By that standard you and Kennie have admitted defeat numerous
> times.
>
> Where have I posted about Dan where Dan doesn't read it?
Right over your head, grag.
> Tell me Moe, Will you go on record as asserting
> that is a wise and honorable tactic for Dan to use?
I post where I want to post.
If where I post aggravates kenny boy and you have to act as his lap
dog... so much the better.
Kent Wills
He did. As anyone with an interest may see from your headers, he
raised the question in the same thread Pangborn proved his boozing
makes his performing simple math impossible.
Greegor
DS > <<<snip kenny boy crying into his keyboard>>>
KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
DS > You can read my messages if you go
DS > to your local library, kenny boy.
G > Dan tacitly admits defeat by using this backstabbing tactic.
Moe > By that standard you and Kennie have
Moe > admitted defeat numerous times.
G > Where have I posted about Dan where Dan doesn't read it?
DS > Right over your head, grag.
In other words, Moe just BS'd.
G > Tell me Moe, Will you go on record as asserting
G > that is a wise and honorable tactic for Dan to use?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/29fc6adef12c7387
DS > I post where I want to post.
DS >
DS > If where I post aggravates kenny boy and
DS > you have to act as his lap dog... so much the better.
Tell me Dan is concerned about wise or honorable, Moe!
Dan's purpose of aggravating Ken is all you care about, right Moe?
Dan has thrown away every shred of honor
and every bragging right just to aggravate Ken P??
Just how OBSESSED is Daniel J. Sullivan III of Patchogue NY?
You've gone AROUND THE BEND, Dan!
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=6+S+Pine+lake+Drive&where=Patchogue%2C+NY
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/29fc6adef12c7387
>
>DS > <<<snip kenny boy crying into his keyboard>>>
>
>KRP > In this case, Danny Sullivan has little choice but
>KRP > to make his attacks where I can't see them
>
>DS > You can read my messages if you go
>DS > to your local library, kenny boy.
>
>G > Dan tacitly admits defeat by using this backstabbing tactic.
>
>Moe > By that standard you and Kennie have
>Moe > admitted defeat numerous times.
>
>G > Where have I posted about Dan where Dan doesn't read it?
>
>DS > Right over your head, grag.
>
>In other words, Moe just BS'd.
You're so stone cold stupid you really didn't, and don't, see
what Moe did. She totally made you look the fool you are.
How does someone as stupid as you present yourself to be survive
in the world?
>
>G > Tell me Moe, Will you go on record as asserting
>G > that is a wise and honorable tactic for Dan to use?
>
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/29fc6adef12c7387
>
>DS > I post where I want to post.
>DS >
>DS > If where I post aggravates kenny boy and
>DS > you have to act as his lap dog... so much the better.
>
>Tell me Dan is concerned about wise or honorable, Moe!
>
>Dan's purpose of aggravating Ken is all you care about, right Moe?
Dan and Moe aren't the same person, stupid.
>
>Dan has thrown away every shred of honor
>and every bragging right just to aggravate Ken P??
When has Dan done so? Be specific as I doubt any other that you
can see it.
>
>Just how OBSESSED is Daniel J. Sullivan III of Patchogue NY?
Maybe a lot, maybe none at all. Please prove your innuendo that
he is the Dan we know from Usenet.
>
>You've gone AROUND THE BEND, Dan!
Your admitted use and abuse of illegal drugs sent you around the
bend years ago.
>
>http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=6+S+Pine+lake+Drive&where=Patchogue%2C+NY
>
>http://www.public-records-now.com/Search/SearchResults.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=daniel&mn=j&ln=sullivan&city=patchogue&state=NY&age=61
>
>http://www.public-records-now.com/Search/SearchResults.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=KaThLeEn&mn=l&ln=sullivan&city=patchogue&state=NY
I'm still waiting for your proof that the person you refer to as
KLS is, in any meaningful way, related to the Dan Sullivan we know.
Your claim may be correct, but given how often you flat out LIE about
people and their relatives, I'm not willing to take your word on it.
Greegor
KBW > Maybe a lot, maybe none at all. Please
KBW > prove your innuendo that
KBW > he is the Dan we know from Usenet.
Is that the tactic you want to use, Dan?
It worked out SO WELL for Kent Wills!
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=6+S+Pine+lake+Drive&where=Patchogue%2C+NY
KBW > I'm still waiting for your proof that the person
KBW > you refer to as KLS is, in any meaningful
KBW > way, related to the Dan Sullivan we know.
Again, Dan, Is this a tactic you really want to use?
Kent thinks it's strategic genius!
What do YOU think of Kent's strategy?