Ken first appeared in apas ranting about remailers because in the
course of one of his meltdowns he ran into someone exactly like
him, David Moore. These two were tailor made for each other. Both
lost accounts during their verbal battles, but Moore took the
biggest hit. Tired of losing accounts when Ken complained in their
ongoing flamefest, he took to the remailers.
Ken came in demanding that the remops halt the activity. The
problem was that at this time none of it was abuse of the net. Ken
was just attempting again to win a flame war by account term. What
he complained about was nothing that Ken wasn't also doing in their
flamefest. Needless to say remops did nothing. This infuriated
Ken.
He started accusing remops and remailers of every evil he could
imagine. Unfortunately, during this David wrongly concluded that
he had backing of the remops and took to forging kens e-mail
address. This was abuse and David handed a legit gripe to Ken.
Yet many remops, already tired of the lies and other typical Ken
behavior were now not motivated to jump up and help him. They'd
been on the receiving end of his lies too long.
Some did address the abuse, blocking kens e-mail from being able to
be used as a from address (forged). Some did nothing. Others
continued to argue with Ken. At this point Ken couldn't see that
the remailers are all comprised of individual unconnected servers
and that they are not one large organization. He won't listen when
anyone attempts to explain either.
Even that some did block his e-mail from being able to be forged
wasn't good enough for Ken. He also demanded from them that any
mention of his name should be blocked as well. He wouldn't listen
when told this wasn't possible, they had blocked his email being
forged and that meant to him that it was possible to block any
mention of the name Ken Pangborn too.
Here is a good example of Ken taking a little truth and twisting it
into a lie. He quickly began screaming about how remops said it
was COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE (sorry about caps, that is Ken speak) but
he proved it wasn't because some had done it! The little truth
being it's possible to block a forgery and then applying the answer
to the demand that all mention of him be blocked equals the lie
that remops said it was completely impossible to block a forgery.
Even a little truth becomes a lie when Ken repeats it.
During the course of his tirades Ken kept demanding that anyone
show one legit use of remailers, just one. He claimed that
remailers served no legit purpose and only existed to promote
abuse. He claimed nobody could prove him wrong with even one
example of a legit use. Someone posted about how remailers were
used in restrictive countries. This spawned his "REMOPS CLAIM TO
SAVE ALL OF AFGHANISTAN" tirades, which morphed further into the
strawman about how Afghanistan didn't even have Internet.
Ken continued demanding that anyone show one legit use of remailers
even as people did. He used nearly every one someone gave as
fodder for another lie. For example, someone said that cotse gave
free accounts residents of battered women's shelters. This wasn't
even related as cotse isn't a remailer, but Ken still took that
answer and turned it into the lie of "REMOPS CLAIM TO SAVE MILLIONS
OF BATTERED WOMEN". This is typical of Ken Pangborn, so typical
that it must be a compulsion.
When called on it he'll sometimes claim he was "exaggerating for
effect", but everyone in here has noted his tirades and have seen
his trademarks. It's a compulsion. Other times he launches a
diversion tirade. One thing in all of this is a demonstrated
certainty, whether on purpose or because he cannot help it, 99.9%
of what comes out of Ken's mouth is a lie. That man is not capable
of the truth and has clearly demonstrated this fact.
Please end the thirteen year old flamewar and kill file him, you
miss nothing but lies. In doing so you'll also save the rest of us
from having to see the same long dull threads arguing Ken's
continuous stream of lies.
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!
nntp.giganews.com!novia!transit4.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!
news-out.readnews.com!postnews3.readnews.com!nr5-
q3a.newsreader.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-
services,misc.legal,soc.men,alt.privacy.anon-server,alt.dads-
rights.unmoderated
Subject: Unbelievable
From: Fredric Jason Sokson <sokson@nomail>
Organization: Campaign for fresh breath
Message-ID: <Xns9C339A...@198.186.190.224>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: 23 Jun 2009 04:56:32 GMT
Lines: 78
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93677d2d.nr5-q3a.newsreader.com
X-Trace: DXC=AF449meEB`5mYd0HcQCl1:]WXNPmdT8Z3^@<oZ6l:QA;h=eGnebc8c23E]
3cG03WG1nM<VZ@\ACY696k;>SZZ3M:hA9GW8=lJ78
X-Complaints-To: ab...@newsreader.com
X-Original-Bytes: 5019
On Jun 22, 11:56 pm, Fredric Jason Sokson <sokson@nomail> wrote:
> This is unbelievable, this flamewar has been going on nearly 13
> years now.
>
> Ken first appeared in apas ranting about remailers because in the
> course of one of his meltdowns he ran into someone exactly like
> him, David Moore.
> These two were tailor made for each other.
Ken doesn't live in his adoptive Mommy's basement
working TEMP JOBS when he can get them
and denying that he is who he really is.
Ken didn't serve ""the REMOP community""
by harassing Eelbash for handing ID info over
to Law Enforcement.
Ken doesn't run a hate site about Dave Moore.
> Both lost accounts during their verbal battles,
verbal?
Ken lost one that he got back within days.
I would not count that experience against Ken.
> but Moore took the biggest hit.
You mean the various web hosts that
kicked Dave's hate site?
> Tired of losing accounts
> when Ken complained in their
> ongoing flamefest, he took to the remailers.
David Daniel Moore is the DARLING of
""the REMOP community"" even though
he is not a REMOP and he actually
creates problems for REMOPS.
> Ken came in demanding that the remops halt the activity. The
> problem was that at this time none of it was abuse of the net. Ken
> was just attempting again to win a flame war by account term.
Um, you forgot the New Zealand hate site.
And the bad Forgeries and duping the
ATHEISTS into thinking Ken posted them.
> What he complained about was nothing that
> Ken wasn't also doing in their flamefest.
Then WHY did Dave need to be ""Anonymous"" ??
> Needless to say remops did nothing.
> This infuriated Ken.
You forgot to mention the code of the REMOPS
dictates doing nothing, especially to somebody
who's part of their gang.
Remember that Dave was also turned loose
on Eelbash and others.
REMOPS knew very well that Dave was
doing things that could get them SUBPOENA'd.
> He started accusing remops and remailers of every evil he could
> imagine.
I can't IMAGINE why!
> Unfortunately, during this David wrongly concluded that
> he had backing of the remops and took to forging kens e-mail
> address.
What, ""our"" David Daniel Moore?
What WILL Maureen MCAllister and Dan Sullivan say? LOL
> This was abuse and David handed a legit gripe to Ken.
As if that was new.
> Yet many remops, already tired of the lies and other typical Ken
> behavior were now not motivated to jump up and help him. They'd
> been on the receiving end of his lies too long.
>
> Some did address the abuse, blocking kens e-mail from being able to
> be used as a from address (forged). Some did nothing. Others
> continued to argue with Ken.
Some of them wouldn't curb somebody who's
part of their little gang?
> At this point Ken couldn't see that
> the remailers are all comprised of individual unconnected servers
> and that they are not one large organization.
You mean the ""community of REMOPS"" is
not a cohesive gang who let Dave into the club house?
> He won't listen when
> anyone attempts to explain either.
After somebody posted a bad forgery claiming
to be his wife and falsely claiming she
was in a group responsible for downing a plane?
> Even that some did block his e-mail from being able to be forged
> wasn't good enough for Ken. He also demanded from them that any
> mention of his name should be blocked as well. He wouldn't listen
> when told this wasn't possible, they had blocked his email being
> forged
Wait, I thought you said some didn't block it.
> and that meant to him that it was possible to block any
> mention of the name Ken Pangborn too.
C'mon, you already acknowledged that some of
them were supportive of Dave Moore's harassment.
> Here is a good example of Ken taking a little truth and twisting it
> into a lie. He quickly began screaming about how remops said it
> was COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE (sorry about caps, that is Ken speak) but
> he proved it wasn't because some had done it! The little truth
> being it's possible to block a forgery and then applying the answer
> to the demand that all mention of him be blocked equals the lie
> that remops said it was completely impossible to block a forgery.
> Even a little truth becomes a lie when Ken repeats it.
As you've described it in your own June 22 post, it sounds
more like justified hyperbole, at the very most.
Definately not a LIE as you described how some
REMOPS were telling him they could not do it.
> During the course of his tirades Ken kept demanding that anyone
> show one legit use of remailers, just one. He claimed that
> remailers served no legit purpose and only existed to promote
> abuse. He claimed nobody could prove him wrong with even one
> example of a legit use. Someone posted about how remailers were
> used in restrictive countries.
Restrictive countries block all known remailers, don't they?
Google helps them with such restrictions!
> This spawned his "REMOPS CLAIM TO
> SAVE ALL OF AFGHANISTAN" tirades, which morphed further into the
> strawman about how Afghanistan didn't even have Internet.
Actually, a ffew years ago, somebody in
""the REMOP community"" quite
successfully sold lots of reporters in
various types of MEDIA on the
""restrictive countries"" BS.
> Ken continued demanding that anyone show one legit use of remailers
> even as people did. He used nearly every one someone gave as
> fodder for another lie. For example, someone said that cotse gave
> free accounts residents of battered women's shelters.
Such shelters tend to have NO INTERNET ACCESS.
> This wasn't even related as cotse isn't a remailer,
> but Ken still took that answer
Who provided that answer, by the way?
If it's not a remailer, then why did they post it?
And why have I seen COTSE FORGERIES
in the newsgroups? (Harassing ones) ?
> and turned it into the lie of "REMOPS CLAIM TO SAVE MILLIONS
> OF BATTERED WOMEN".
> This is typical of Ken Pangborn, so typical
> that it must be a compulsion.
Or it could be that Ken can read English.
> When called on it he'll sometimes claim he was "exaggerating for
> effect", but everyone in here has noted his tirades and have seen
> his trademarks. It's a compulsion.
It's called hyperbole.
The REMOPS who joined in with David Daniel Moore
bear some responsibility for that.
Do REMOPS think that being an accessory
to a crime is funny? (See subpoena response!)
> Other times he launches a
> diversion tirade. One thing in all of this is a demonstrated
> certainty, whether on purpose or because he cannot help it, 99.9%
> of what comes out of Ken's mouth is a lie.
Except for the part you just confirmed, no doubt.
You don't think 99.9 % was HYPERBOLE from you?
> That man is not capable
> of the truth and has clearly demonstrated this fact.
Since some of the REMOPS are in fact complicit
with the harassment, according to YOUR OWN
statement, why wouldn't Ken rage?
> Please end the thirteen year old flamewar
> and kill file him, you miss nothing but lies.
> In doing so you'll also save the rest of us
> from having to see the same long dull
> threads arguing Ken's continuous
> stream of lies.
Miraculously you overlooked Dave's
ongoing newsgroup Forgeries,
Caller ID trickery using VOIP,
Police calls, falsely taking credit
for downing a French airliner for a "mark" etc.
""Anonymous Dave"" certainly seems to
be attracting a lot of negative attention
to anonymous remailers.
How long will it be before some REMOPS
decide to rat out David Daniel Moore?
How many have already ratted him out?
I've already told Dave that he has a regular
fan club forming from other people he
has targeted for various types of harassment.
It doesn't even take a SUBPOENA.
> This is unbelievable, this flamewar has been going on nearly 13
> years now.
13 YEARS???? Exaggerate a little? More like 2001 - 2003.
> Ken first appeared in apas ranting about remailers because in the
> course of one of his meltdowns he ran into someone exactly like
> him, David Moore. These two were tailor made for each other. Both
> lost accounts during their verbal battles, but Moore took the
> biggest hit. Tired of losing accounts when Ken complained in their
> ongoing flamefest, he took to the remailers.
>
> Ken came in demanding that the remops halt the activity. The
> problem was that at this time none of it was abuse of the net. Ken
> was just attempting again to win a flame war by account term. What
> he complained about was nothing that Ken wasn't also doing in their
> flamefest. Needless to say remops did nothing. This infuriated
> Ken.
I asked REMOPS to change that they ALLOWED impersonations. The initial
response was to claim that it was "IMPOSSIBLE" ( a claim which insults the
intellect of anyone who knows anything about code). It was not only NOT
"impossible" it was EASY to change. And when some REMOPS recognized the
abuses and DID change, changing TWO LINES of code, remailer users turned
their harassment to them. Eelbash being one. The second response from the
REMOPS and users was to make grandiose claims of all the noble deeds of
remailers. Saving battered women, getting info in and out of oppressed
nations
> Ken continued demanding that anyone show one legit use of remailers even
> as people did.
Yes the claims of saving battered women and getting info in and out of
oppressed nations. In specific Afghanistan, North Korea, and Cuba. All of
which were UTTER BULLSHIT. First of all they never offered "PROOF" that they
had actually done ANY of those things. Merely unsubstantiated claims. Most
of which were EASY to disprove. Part of it set me off in 2003 because the
claims about their clandestine operation in Cuba were so preposterous. I had
been to Cuba. The claims were INSANE. Cuba did NOT at that time have the
"INTERNET" they only had a CLOSELY monitored INTRANET. As to Afghanistan,
the claims of getting information IN and OUT of that country during the
Taliban era in late 2001 were INSANE. Really a stupid claim to make since at
that time there was NO phone service let alone INTERNET and not even any
electrical service. Yet we were asked to believe that REMAILERS were
operating in that country where having a TV or computer was a death penalty
crime.
These REMAILER PEOPLE seem NOT to understand why their claims are so
insulting to people's intelligence. They think that just because they beat
their chest we should all fall down and believe their MADE UP crap. Let's
talk about Cuba. Even today only about 10% of the people have phone service.
The average Cuban worker earns about $10 a month. Before these IDIOTS shoot
their mouths off AGAIN claiming that people "bring them in:" for the Cuban
people. Until last year you could bring in a LAPTOP - however it was logged
and if you did not take it back out you were subject to arrest.
Now - let me again address the BULLSHIT. There were a limited number of
places where you could even hook up to the internet.
1. Extremely monitored government offices.
2. Hotels. (Those were forbidden to Cubans until 2008)
3. At SOME phone company offices and SOME post offices. BOTH highly
regulated and monitored.
While you COULD send international e-mail it was not (and presumably
still IS not) done in real time. The central net HUB is in Havana. Much like
primitive BBS systems, all MAIL goes to Havana to hit the net. EVERY piece
of mail is inspected several times before it is propagated. Also every Cuban
KNOWS this. In Cuba EVERY message can be TRACED to who sent it. These IDIOTS
debating this (Americans and Europeans) have NO CONCEPT of how the systems
operate in those countries. Any encrypted mail is certain to result in
somebody being "detained." These clowns have NO idea what that is like.
NO - the claims of just going down to the corner "internet cafe" was silly.
See items 1-2 and 3 above. NO there is NOT an Internet Cafe on every corner
like there is in Paris or Brussels. Not even all the hotels have internet.
But even THAT is monitored by the state security police. How do I KNOW? Let
me start with the fact that the husband of my wife's cousin is one of the
KGB trained security police. Your claims of remailer operation in Cuba is
such MOUNTAINOUS BULLSHIT as to insult even a retarded 12 year old.
> Please end the thirteen year old flamewar and kill file him
You guys NEED to hide. Better than admitting you CANNOT prove the
bullshit claims for the remailers. You want people to IGNORE the many
international arrests of pedophiles trafficking in kiddie porn (via
remailers) and trafficking in children for child prostitution. Going to
impoverished nations like Thailand, Bangladesh, India etc and BUYING
children to use bused by pedophiles as prostitutes and how it is done by
remailer users. Your BULLSHIT would be funny but Interpol has made over
23,000 ARRESTS for this shit in the past 10 years. The "private internet
chat room" was closely associated with remailers.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,284137,00.html
Global Pedophile Ring Investigation That Netted 700 Suspects Stemmed
in Part From Earlier U.S. Case
By Catherine Donaldson-Evans AP Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Photo: Timothy David Martyn Cox
http://www.foxnews.com/images/294699/2_61_061907_pedophile_ring.jpg
The British police sting that busted a pedophile network Monday of
more than 700 suspects in 35 countries stemmed in part from an ongoing
U.S. investigation of "molestation on demand" that spanned several
states here, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE).
The worldwide pedophile operation involved the abuse of at least 31
young children, some who were photographed and others who were
molested live on streaming video.
More than 15 of the tiny victims were in Britain, the British
government's Child Exploitation and Online Protection Center (CEOP)
found in its probe.
The children were rescued by British authorities, who have identified
and are investigating the 700 suspects — 200 of whom are based in
Britain, according to the CEOP. In addition to Britain and the United
States, Australia and Canada also took part in the investigation.
A British man, 27-year-old Timothy David Martyn Cox, ran a site used
for the sharing of the horrific images from his bedroom in Suffolk,
where he lived with his parents.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ Much nicer than living in your adoptive mom's basement, right
Dave? ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A judge sentenced Cox on Monday to an indefinite jail term.
Related Stories: Global Pedophile Ring Investigation Nets 700 Suspects
The latest developments come on top of the 27 defendants in four
countries already charged in the case with the possession, receipt,
distribution and manufacture of child pornography, according to ICE.
Thirteen of them were in the United States, nine in Canada, three in
Australia and two in Great Britain. One of the 27 is a fugitive.
Of the 13 defendants charged in this country, two Springfield, Ill.,
men — 34-year-old Billy Joe Bowser and 49-year-old Anthony Adams —
have been convicted and sentenced, Bowser to the maximum of 20 years
behind bars and Adams to 19 years, the ICE reported last year, when
the indictments were handed down.
Both pleaded guilty in October 2006 to receiving, possessing and
transporting child pornography. Their sentences are without parole,
since there is no parole in the U.S. federal prison system.
The global network of pedophiles molested infants as young as only 2
months old, according to Ernie Allen, president of the National Center
for Missing and Exploited Children, which worked closely with law
enforcement agencies worldwide on the case.
"We're seeing that the victims are becoming younger and younger,"
Allen told FOXNews.com. In fact, he said, 39 percent of child
pornography offenders in this country have images of children under 6;
19 percent have images of kids younger than 3.
"These are crime scene photos. This memorializes the molestation of a
child," Allen said. "These images are inseparable from the physical
victimization of children."
Missing British toddler Madeleine McCann — who made international
headlines in early May after she disappeared in Portugal while she was
with her parents on vacation — may have been taken by an international
pedophile network, Portuguese authorities have theorized.
But there is no evidence to date to suggest that the ring nabbed by
British police kidnapped the 3-year-old, according to Allen — whose
organization has received numerous tips about Madeleine since she
vanished.
"I'm confident there's no connection with this case," Allen said.
"This [global] investigation has been going on a long time. It would
be speculation until we find the child. We've received leads and
sightings to follow up on, but to my knowledge, there's nothing that
gives anybody a strong sense of where she is and who took her."
In the American part of the global pedophile investigation, begun in
April 2005, undercover agents infiltrated a private Internet chat room
called "Kiddypics & Kiddyvids" that was used worldwide to trade
thousands of images of child pornography — including streaming videos
of live molestations — in part through peer-to-peer file sharing,
according to ICE.
The American probe was comprised of investigations in at least 11
states, resulting in the 13 indictments in nine states, the ICE
reported in March 2006, when U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
announced the indictments.
Authorities found hordes of extremely disturbing images of
"molestation on demand," according to ICE.
In addition to Illinois, indictments were unsealed last March in
Tennessee, Michigan, Florida, Nevada, New York, Arizona and Hawaii and
also in North Carolina state court. Thirteen defendants were charged
with offenses including possession, distribution and receipt of child
pornography, according to ICE.
On Monday in Britain, Cox — who referred to himself as "Son of God" —
was sentenced to an indefinite jail term at Ipswich Crown Court after
he admitted to nine offenses of possessing or distributing obscene
photos of children. His sentence means he'll stay in prison until
authorities decide that he no longer poses a threat to minors.
Police found 75,960 explicit images on his computer and evidence that
he'd sent 11,491 such photographs and videos to other users. Cox was
arrested in September 2006.
Officers nabbed other pedophiles in the ring by continuing to run the
site under Cox's name after his arrest.
A man characterized as Cox's deputy, 33-year-old Gordon Mackintosh,
tried to restart the chat room in January, but British, American,
Canadian and Australian investigators again tapped into the operation
and thwarted it.
Mackintosh was arrested in January, after which agents impersonated
him online to find other perpetrators. He has pleaded guilty to 27
charges of making, possessing and distributing indecent images and
videos and is awaiting his sentence.
Twenty-four Canadian suspects have been arrested and seven children
rescued, a Canadian official told The Associated Press, but the time
period for that portion of the operation was longer than the 10 months
the British said their probe lasted.
Thanks for the summary of what's going on with Ken Pangborn in this
subject. It clears up the reasons why Kennie is doing his little shit-
fest.
From your account I get the feeling that Kennie is trying to be some
sort of online dictator or bully where he would like to control
everything he sets his eyes upon.
Thirteen years of his garbage and no end in sight. I'd suspect Kennie
needs this to make himself feel important.
Moe
Know your snakes--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
"Fredric Jason Sokson" <sokson@nomail> wrote in message
news:Xns9C339A...@198.186.190.224...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,284137,00.html
Global Pedophile Ring Investigation That Netted 700 Suspects Stemmed
in Part From Earlier U.S. Case
By Catherine Donaldson-Evans AP Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Photo: Timothy David Martyn Cox
http://www.foxnews.com/images/294699/2_61_061907_pedophile_ring.jpg
The British police sting that busted a pedophile network Monday of
more than 700 suspects in 35 countries stemmed in part from an ongoing
U.S. investigation of "molestation on demand" that spanned several
states here, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE).
The worldwide pedophile operation involved the abuse of at least 31
young children, some who were photographed and others who were
molested live on streaming video.
===========
Greg these CREEPS are also the ones who go to extremely poor countries like
Thailand, Bangladesh, India wherever they can find DESPERATE parents willing
to SELL their children not knowing their children will be to become CHILD
PROSTITUTE SLAVES to these people. They are traded and filmed in sex acts
for the amusement of these CREEPS. Law enforcement constantly monitors their
shit and tracks their activities. THIS is what they HIDE. I have given them
an opportunity for EIGHT YEARS to prove their claims of being SAINTS, saving
battered women and helping people in captive nations. TO DATE - NOTHING! Yet
the arrests of these CREEPS pile up. And they want me to feel bad that they
criticize me. Given WHO and WHAT they are - I am NOT going to lose ANY sleep
over a gang of PERVERTS calling me names! REALLY! I keep cheering the cops
who are nailing them.
You seem to know alot about this child porn stuff. What kind of
degradation did you inflict on your own daughter (Brianna Brag) to
cause her go into making porn Pangborn?
Cutting cross posts lists won't help you.
Did you read the REMOP answer to a SUBPOENA, Moe?
I'm sure you doubt that they peed their pants.
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services, misc.legal,
alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime
From: mmrpurdue <mmrpur...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 23 2009 10:27 am
Subject: Re: Unbelievable
( Jun 23, 10:10 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> quoted )\
You seem to know alot about this child porn stuff. What kind of
degradation did you inflict on your own daughter (Brianna Brag) to
cause her go into making porn Pangborn?
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services, misc.legal,
soc.men, alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.dads-rights.unmoderated
From: whitevamp <fvrn...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 23 2009 5:16 am
Subject: Re: Unbelievable
( Jun 22, 11:56 pm, Fredric Jason Sokson <sokson@nomail> quoted )
Thanks for the summary of what's going on with Ken Pangborn in this
subject. It clears up the reasons why Kennie is doing his little
shit-
fest.
From your account I get the feeling that Kennie is trying to be some
sort of online dictator or bully where he would like to control
everything he sets his eyes upon.
Thirteen years of his garbage and no end in sight. I'd suspect Kennie
needs this to make himself feel important.
Moe
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services, misc.legal
From: "Dave P" <inva...@example.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:34:43 -0700
Local: Tues, Jun 23 2009 6:34 am
Subject: Re: Unbelievable
Good point. Female victims of incest and sexual abuse have a
tendency to go into prostitution and other avenues of the sex
performance " business".
It is a good question as to WHY she went into " adult entertainment",
as it is why she doesn't want Kennie finding her and seeing her son.
G > Ken doesn't live in his adoptive Mommy's basement
G > working TEMP JOBS when he can get them
G > and denying that he is who he really is.
Anony > Yes, he does.
Back to the 12 year old mentality?
Are you 12 or are you a grown man with
arrrested development?
Sorry BULLSHIT ARTIST. I own my own home and have for over 20 years. No
mortgage. Your pal Moore still lives supported by his MOMMY, and he's 39
years old. STILL living with MOMMY in her basement in Calumet City.
No, I don't, regardless of how many times you tell this lie.
> and he's 39 years old.
No, I'm not.
You, yourself, have stated that I'm much older than this.
> STILL living with MOMMY in her basement in Calumet City.
My mother is deceased. Even when she was alive, she neither lived in
"Calumet City" nor owned a home with a basement.
Then there's that pesky little fact that the house you refer to, and posted
photos of, doesn't seem to even have a basement.
Not to mention that you'd have no way of knowing which floor was occupied
by whom in the house. Thus further proving that you are simply lying.
More of your lies, shot down. This is like shooting fish in a barrel....
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's
Association or AN Y connection to them."
- --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
- --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to
claim that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services
**, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQCVAwUBSkFUg8Wdjev37kExAQE8MwP+MQm8ryDOqY9fuKr+w3wX+ht/Rm4vDnq2
ZP47rqmXFMjZRr6VCUD1jJz14fvaQGZaF/zIooCpa6GGErebefEWbDAm169yps8h
T7Of5MagGr1xuIQ3OKvbkr2UMTqVd6dE+TPNAYJNNNklEihw0F1SCyQAns5oPug+
OBWkZ1o4ZSA=
=uriK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 23 Jun 2009, Fredric Jason Sokson <sokson@nomail> wrote:
>This is unbelievable, this flamewar has been going on nearly 13
>years now.
>
>Ken first appeared in apas ranting about remailers because in the
>course of one of his meltdowns he ran into someone exactly like
>him, David Moore. These two were tailor made for each other. Both
>lost accounts during their verbal battles, but Moore took the
>biggest hit. Tired of losing accounts when Ken complained in their
>ongoing flamefest, he took to the remailers.
It is true that I use remailers to avoid having my ISP contacted. I also
use them to conceal my geographic location, which Ken would attempt to use
to further harass me. (See his posts where he's erroneously concluded that
I live in the Chicago suburbs, and what he's done with that
misinformation.)
Oh and by the way, leaving the "flamewar" on my part would do no good.
I've been gone for months, only to look back in on the newsgroups and see
Ken ranting about me in nearly every post.
Also, my opinion is that people need to be made aware of Ken and his
tactics. There are men who are in bad legal situations, who might
otherwise make the mistake of hiring Ken based upon his false credentials.
I know for a fact that at least half a dozen men have read my materials and
decided NOT to send Ken money. Hopefully, they've gone on and hired
someone legitimate, rather than a fraud who purchased his education on the
internet and who seems lacking in even rudimentary legal concepts. If this
gets me labeled as a "kook" in some circles, I'm just fine with it!
>
>Ken came in demanding that the remops halt the activity. The
>problem was that at this time none of it was abuse of the net. Ken
>was just attempting again to win a flame war by account term. What
>he complained about was nothing that Ken wasn't also doing in their
>flamefest. Needless to say remops did nothing. This infuriated
>Ken.
>
He had a similar reaction with the owner of one of my ISPs, whom I was
acquainted with. After receiving over 200 complaints, the guy told him to
go pound sand, and Ken then began slandering the guy and the ISP in all of
his local newsgroups.
>He started accusing remops and remailers of every evil he could
>imagine. Unfortunately, during this David wrongly concluded that
>he had backing of the remops and took to forging kens e-mail
>address.
This is untrue. While I have observed Ken being forged from time to time,
they seemed to be isolated cases of people "yanking his chain" just to see
him react. I never participated.
Also, one significant part which you left out of this history, is that Ken
himself has used remailers to forge. He was caught doing this in
alt.atheism.
iQCVAwUBSkDpzsWdjev37kExAQEc1AQAvGycft+kTG0NrznXwduP5ON3RaYkW1Jb
NsiVMSQvHipvCC0x5kd5EJJhBonpZPgiyA9lSTfm96n5Rbka272u0jCYttaks1Yn
UlRA5EZ4VNOITSXPrCZOIPA/WGs1ibRxiOuerrODdJnQZJtqmwRcjP5ifLJAF+M0
wzgq99MjeUk=
=63vd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Yes you do, no matter how many times you TRY to LIE and say you don't.
>> and he's 39 years old.
>
> No, I'm not.
Yes Davey - date of birth 9/26/1970. 39 in 3 months.
> You, yourself, have stated that I'm much older than this.
BULLSHIT!!!! As usual/
>> STILL living with MOMMY in her basement in Calumet City.
> My mother is deceased. Even when she was alive, she neither lived in
> "Calumet City" nor owned a home with a basement.
More BULLSHIT she's alive and kicking.
> Then there's that pesky little fact that the house you refer to, and
> posted
> photos of, doesn't seem to even have a basement.
Moore your claims are BULLSHIT. The property records available ON LINE from
Cook County, Illinois property offices show it is a 2 STORY house with
FINISHED BASEMENT. Your LIES notwithstanding. Again your LIE are stupid
because they have been repeatedly DISPROVED!
Keywords: david daniel moore pathological liar, david daniel moore
calumet city, illinois, david daniel moore internet psychopath, Lotus,
david daniel moore stalker, stalker, real estate agents, david daniel moore
pathological liar, david daniel moore, pervert, abusive real estate agents,
david daniel moore coward, david daniel moore computer hacker,
david daniel moore criminal, internet stalkers david daniel moore,
internet harassment david daniel moore, david daniel moore, moore the porn
star,
internet libel, david daniel moore website of lies,janet moore,
850 buffalo avenue, calumet city,illinos, dui, linda boss, ACT, Lotus
Solutions consulting,
david daniel moore malicious use of employers computers,
david daniel moore sara lee corporation, never employ david
daniel moore, internet psychopaths, david daniel moore, david kojack, moore,
chicagoland pansies, internet addiction, internet stalking, woman hater,
tara moreland, janet more, dawn moore, alias dustin calloway, alias
david miller, alias david boss, alias jeff johnson, blackmailer, sexual
harassment,sexual blackmail, david moore bbs blackmail, david moore usmc, 29
palms california,linda boss, david moore child abuser, anonymous remailer
stalkers, anonymous remailer abusers, basement dwellers,off shore website,
new zealand, malaysia website,employer hotel/casino,computer abuse, office
disruption,
obsessive compulsive disorder, four winds,calumet city drag queen,
transvestite,
sexual disorders, mglf, milwaukee general liberation front,punks, putz,
cowardice, forger, mommys basement, skinheads, forgeries, willian rainey
harper college,
coalition forces, buffalo, michigan, david moore coalition supreme allied
commander,
anonymous remailer stalkers, david moore womanizer, david daniel moore drag
queen,
lotus programs, IT contractors, david d. moore aryan nations member.
> It is true that I use remailers to avoid having my ISP contacted. I also
> use them to conceal my geographic location, which Ken would attempt to use
> to further harass me. (See his posts where he's erroneously concluded
> that
> I live in the Chicago suburbs, and what he's done with that
> misinformation.)
Why do you worry about having your ISP contacted Davey- UNLESS of course
what you do is BAD SHIT????
Davey as you PRETEND and I do mean PRETEND being the PURE INNOCENT VICTIM of
ME, how do you explain your including innocent people such as this in your
HARASSING ""Keywords?"
QUOTE FROM YOUR OWN POSTS:
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
Remember Davey you are the PURE - - - INNOCENT - - VICTIM... So WHY do
these folks get to be harassed BY YOU"?? What did THEY DO? Other than your
signature brand of trying to BLACKMAIL ME by harassing others you *THINK*
that are somehow associated with me. And how you feel that GOD has called
you to this mission in life? Go ahead DAVEY - EXPLAIN that LIST of people
to your AUDIENCE on how THEY deserve your harassment. Give it your BEST SHOT
on what THEY DID to provoke you.
Meanwhile have some KEYWORDS back at ya:
KRP > Why do you worry about having your ISP
KRP > contacted Davey- UNLESS of course
KRP > what you do is BAD SHIT????
Do anonymous remailers exist so that harassers
can avoid civil, criminal and ISP problems?
KRP > Davey as you PRETEND and I do mean
KRP > PRETEND being the PURE INNOCENT
KRP > VICTIM of ME, how do you explain your
KRP > including innocent people such as this
KRP > in your HARASSING ""Keywords?"
KRP >
KRP > QUOTE FROM YOUR OWN POSTS:
[ List of key words which are names of a large number of people ]
KRP > Remember Davey you are the PURE
KRP > - - - INNOCENT - - VICTIM... So WHY
KRP > do these folks get to be harassed BY
KRP > YOU"?? What did THEY DO? Other than
KRP > your signature brand of trying to
KRP > BLACKMAIL ME by harassing others
KRP > you *THINK* that are somehow associated
KRP > with me. And how you feel that GOD
KRP > has called you to this mission in life?
KRP > Go ahead DAVEY - EXPLAIN that LIST
KRP > of people to your AUDIENCE on how
KRP > THEY deserve your harassment. Give
KRP > it your BEST SHOT on what THEY
KRP > DID to provoke you.
KRP >
KRP > Meanwhile have some KEYWORDS back at ya:
[ List of David Daniel Moore aliases, actions, etc. ]
Do anonymous remailers exist to protect the
""secret identity"" of somebody who harasses
so much they have to make a list of "marks"
or collateral targets as part of their campaign
of harassment?