Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

whatever the outcome, Steelers still have 5 rings, all with integrity

0 views
Skip to first unread message

hexHead®

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:10:34 PM12/8/07
to
for all you Patsies fans, integrity means "no cheating"

Quixoticelixer

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:19:43 PM12/8/07
to

"hexHeadŽ" <hex...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:f19ml3p22l9fk8qq2...@4ax.com...

> for all you Patsies fans, integrity means "no cheating"

Like no steroids?


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:26:40 PM12/8/07
to
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:19:43 -0500, "Quixoticelixer" <RHCP@*> wrote:

>
>"hexHead®" <hex...@msn.com> wrote in message

>news:f19ml3p22l9fk8qq2...@4ax.com...
>> for all you Patsies fans, integrity means "no cheating"
>
>Like no steroids?
>

Where steroids illegal?

wiLD tuRkEy

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:28:09 PM12/8/07
to

"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
news:21aml398ocaqeonte...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:19:43 -0500, "Quixoticelixer" <RHCP@*> wrote:
>
>>
>>"hexHeadŽ" <hex...@msn.com> wrote in message

>>news:f19ml3p22l9fk8qq2...@4ax.com...
>>> for all you Patsies fans, integrity means "no cheating"
>>
>>Like no steroids?
>>
> Where steroids illegal?
obviously not in shitsburgh


Husky

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:33:30 PM12/8/07
to
On Dec 8, 6:26 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:19:43 -0500, "Quixoticelixer" <RHCP@*> wrote:
>
> >"hexHead(R)" <hexH...@msn.com> wrote in message

> >news:f19ml3p22l9fk8qq2...@4ax.com...
> >> for all you Patsies fans, integrity means "no cheating"
>
> >Like no steroids?
>
> Where steroids illegal?

At the time, they were prescription drugs which could only be had
legally via prescription, of course only for valid purposes.

Dr. Winston O'Boogie

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:39:43 PM12/8/07
to

"hexHeadŽ" <hex...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:f19ml3p22l9fk8qq2...@4ax.com...

> for all you Patsies fans, integrity means "no cheating"

I suppose the refs just made a few simple mistakes, but the Seahawks were
beaten fair and square. If there ever was a Super Bowl victory that should
have an asterisk attached to it, this would be the one.


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:41:29 PM12/8/07
to
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 23:28:09 GMT, "wiLD tuRkEy" <Patr...@boston.com>
wrote:

The correct answer is no.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:42:17 PM12/8/07
to
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:33:30 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Ok.

Brother Freebyrd

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 6:47:53 PM12/8/07
to

"Dr. Winston O'Boogie" <quarr...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:aXF6j.182$bW7....@news.sisna.com...
>
> "hexHead®" <hex...@msn.com> wrote in message

Please please Dr. show us some proof!!!! We are still waiting for someone to
and its been almost 3 years now. Nothing, notta, none......


Dr. Winston O'Boogie

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 7:20:45 PM12/8/07
to
> Like no steroids?


You're trying to compare fabricated lies about a true dynasty with an
asterisk-ridden team that has been hit with heaviest fines in sports history for
PROVEN cheating......

It's time all of us in Patriot Nation admit the truth.....we cheat, and that's
the only way we know how to win.

- Winston

Dr. Winston O'Boogie

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 7:20:59 PM12/8/07
to
> obviously not in shitsburgh

Dr. Winston O'Boogie

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 7:21:19 PM12/8/07
to
> At the time, they were prescription drugs which could only be had
> legally via prescription, of course only for valid purposes.

OceanView

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 7:25:25 PM12/8/07
to
> I suppose the refs just made a few simple mistakes, but the Seahawks were
> beaten fair and square. If there ever was a Super Bowl victory that should
> have an asterisk attached to it, this would be the one.


Let it go, Winston.......all of us here in Patriot Nation know the Steelers
earned their 5 rings with talent and hard work, whereas we got lucky because we
had a good kicker who saved our asses at the last second, and we now have
asterisks next to everything we do because of our cheating coach, who is a liar
and prick.

Can't anyone in Patriot Nation besides me fess up to the truth? You all sadden
me.... :-(

- OceanView

who'sthatretard

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 8:06:30 PM12/8/07
to
If you're going to hijack an email address (which could-should come back to
bite you) you should be smart enough to hide your IP address.


NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.131.247.34

Name: c-24-131-247-34.hsd1.pa.comcast.net
Location: Pittsburg (40.478N, 79.950W)

Node Data
Node Net Reg IP Address Location Node Name
13 1 1 24.131.247.34 Pittsburgh
c-24-131-247-34.hsd1.pa.comcast.net


Registrant:
Comcast Corporation
1500 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
US

Domain Name: COMCAST.NET

Administrative Contact:
Administrator, Domain Registration ContactMiddleName
domre...@COMCAST.net
Comcast Corporation
1500 Market, West Tower
Philadelphia, PA 19102
US
215-320-8774 fax: 215-564-0132

Technical Contact:
Technical Contact, Domain Reg ContactMiddleName
domre...@comcastonline.com
Comcast Corporation
1500 Market St.
9Fl West
Philadelphia, PA 19102
US
215-320-8774 fax: 215-564-0132
Domain servers in listed order:

DNS101.COMCAST.NET 68.87.64.204


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 8:36:29 PM12/8/07
to
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:20:59 -0500, "Dr. Winston O'Boogie"
<quarr...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>> obviously not in shitsburgh
>
>
>You're trying to compare fabricated lies about a true dynasty with an
>asterisk-ridden team that has been hit with heaviest fines in sports history for
>PROVEN cheating......

In sports history? Ever heard of the Chicago Black Sox?

>It's time all of us in Patriot Nation admit the truth.....we cheat, and that's
>the only way we know how to win.
>
>- Winston

Silly notion

OceanView

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 11:11:08 PM12/8/07
to
"Dr. Winston O'Boogie" <quarr...@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:MvWdnYvKdaF7qcba...@comcast.com:

12-0, one game, minor cheating that "had no influence in the outcome of the
game" - The Commisioner. The only way they know how to win? How fucking
stupid can you idiots get?

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 1:00:32 AM12/9/07
to

"minor" cheating is worth a first round draft pick? That's minor?

Curly C

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 2:08:22 AM12/9/07
to
The 1970's steelers are widely known as the first nfl team to have many
players on steroids. They were the first cheaters.

Brother Freebyrd

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 4:08:43 AM12/9/07
to

"Curly C" <KeeponC...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:20918-475...@storefull-3157.bay.webtv.net...

> The 1970's steelers are widely known as the first nfl dynasty.....

Hey Curly, hows Moe and Larry?


Husky

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 7:40:27 AM12/9/07
to
On Dec 8, 7:21 pm, "TJM" > copy&pasted:

Come on TJM, face the facts that your boys were cheating decades ago

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 8:13:59 AM12/9/07
to
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 02:08:22 -0500, KeeponC...@webtv.net (Curly C)
wrote:

>The 1970's steelers are widely known as the first nfl team to have many
>players on steroids. They were the first cheaters.

If it didn't violate the NFL rules it wasn't cheating.

Husky

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 8:20:53 AM12/9/07
to
On Dec 9, 1:00 am, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On 09 Dec 2007 04:11:08 GMT, OceanView <f...@chance.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >"Dr. Winston O'Boogie" <quarrym...@bellsouth.net> wrote in

> >news:MvWdnYvKdaF7qcba...@comcast.com:
>
> >>> obviously not in shitsburgh
>
> >> You're trying to compare fabricated lies about a true dynasty with an
> >> asterisk-ridden team that has been hit with heaviest fines in sports
> >> history for PROVEN cheating......
>
> >> It's time all of us in Patriot Nation admit the truth.....we cheat,
> >> and that's the only way we know how to win.
>
> >> - Winston
>
> >12-0, one game, minor cheating that "had no influence in the outcome of the
> >game" - The Commisioner. The only way they know how to win? How fucking
> >stupid can you idiots get?
>
> "minor" cheating is worth a first round draft pick? That's minor?

More to the point, the penalty was excessive.
Hey the used to hang men for "rustling."

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 8:45:26 AM12/9/07
to
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 05:20:53 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 9, 1:00 am, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

From what I've read and heard it seems to be just about right.

This is the old west..stop trying to change the subject.

Rick Rockett

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 9:26:11 AM12/9/07
to

"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
news:3gqnl3do7mser4rsa...@4ax.com...

Well, it does in a way moron. If you break a law, you violate moral and
ethics clauses in contracts. Now I know why you moved to the South. So you
can be with people as stupid as you!!!

MZ

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 9:53:39 AM12/9/07
to
"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
news:gasnl3h3jc16rntf6...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 05:20:53 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
>>More to the point, the penalty was excessive.
>>Hey the used to hang men for "rustling."
>
> From what I've read and heard it seems to be just about right.

Prove it. (TM)


OceanView

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 9:59:42 AM12/9/07
to
who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in
news:gasnl3h3jc16rntf6...@4ax.com:

It was a severe penalty. When they finally catch the Colts piping in
sound, what do you think that will be? $100 maybe?

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 10:09:40 AM12/9/07
to

It's an opinion and needs no independent proof.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 10:10:36 AM12/9/07
to

The two have nothing to do with each other other than one happened and
one didn't.

Husky

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 10:28:38 AM12/9/07
to
On Dec 9, 8:45 am, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 05:20:53 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>
It is?

>stop trying to change the subject.
It was a metaphor, but you already knew that.

Husky

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 10:30:46 AM12/9/07
to
On Dec 9, 10:09 am, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:53:39 -0500, "MZ" <m...@nospam.void> wrote:
> >"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
> >news:gasnl3h3jc16rntf6...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 05:20:53 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>

> >>>More to the point, the penalty was excessive.
> >>>Hey the used to hang men for "rustling."
>
> >> From what I've read and heard it seems to be just about right.
>
> >Prove it. (TM)
>
> It's an opinion and needs no independent proof.

Then in my opinion, your opinion is wrong. Does anyone else have an
opinion?

OceanView

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 10:35:50 AM12/9/07
to
who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in
news:u91ol3tjr9ccblng0...@4ax.com:

Bullshit. They WILL get caught.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 1:12:24 PM12/9/07
to
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:30:46 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 9, 10:09 am, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

As I pointed out from what I've heard it was just about right.

Husky

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 2:20:35 PM12/9/07
to
On Dec 9, 1:12 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:30:46 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>

Who'd you hear it from, the ten little voices in your head?

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 7:53:02 PM12/9/07
to
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:20:35 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 9, 1:12 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

Unlike you I listen to a lot of sources..some that don't like the
Pats!

Husky

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 8:28:46 PM12/9/07
to
On Dec 9, 7:53 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:20:35 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Dec 9, 1:12 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:30:46 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Dec 9, 10:09 am, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:53:39 -0500, "MZ" <m...@nospam.void> wrote:
> >> >> >"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:gasnl3h3jc16rntf6...@4ax.com...
> >> >> >> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 05:20:53 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>>More to the point, the penalty was excessive.
> >> >> >>>Hey the used to hang men for "rustling."
>
> >> >> >> From what I've read and heard it seems to be just about right.
>
> >> >> >Prove it. (TM)
>
> >> >> It's an opinion and needs no independent proof.
>
> >> >Then in my opinion, your opinion is wrong. Does anyone else have an
> >> >opinion?
>
> >> As I pointed out from what I've heard it was just about right.
>
> >Who'd you hear it from, the ten little voices in your head?
>
> Unlike you I listen to a lot of sources..some that don't like the
> Pats!

Right, like the ten voices in your head and Merrill Hoge.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 8:52:07 AM12/10/07
to
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:28:46 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 9, 7:53 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

Everyone has 'voices' in their head...my just doesn't call itself god.
I had to Google Merrill Hoge because I had no idea who he\she is\was.
I don't watch ESPN so I still don't know who he is.

wart...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 9:55:55 AM12/10/07
to
On Dec 8, 6:26 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:19:43 -0500, "Quixoticelixer" <RHCP@*> wrote:
>
> >"hexHead(R)" <hexH...@msn.com> wrote in message
> >news:f19ml3p22l9fk8qq2...@4ax.com...
> >> for all you Patsies fans, integrity means "no cheating"
>
> >Like no steroids?
>
> Where steroids illegal?

The use of them to gain a competitive advantage demonstrates complete
lack of integrity, regardless of whether or not they were illegal.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 12:16:13 PM12/10/07
to

They weren't illegal in the NFL therefore the whine that the Steelers
cheated is just that...a pitiful whine

Husky

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 12:26:06 PM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 12:16 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

This issue has been addressed, but you already knew that. If their
use is for off label usage and or if they were attained sans a
legitimate prescription, it is a violation of Federal Law and the
standard NFL players contract.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/msg/a0e188d7c9563990

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 1:25:54 PM12/10/07
to
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:26:06 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 10, 12:16 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

Whining

Husky

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 1:33:32 PM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 1:25 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:26:06 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots/ms...
>
> Whining

Trolling.

I see you're not a big fan of facts.

"None so blind as those who will not see!"

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 2:10:17 PM12/10/07
to

"Husky" <Cyn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2204977d-12bc-45bb...@b15g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

I don't see the need to confuse myself with facts. I have a superior
newsreader to you which makes you an idiot! Put that in your pipe and smoke
it!


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 2:15:17 PM12/10/07
to
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:33:32 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 10, 1:25 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

The facts are that there was no rule violation.....unless you have
some proof?

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 2:37:32 PM12/10/07
to

"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
news:j04rl3dlbfshh9fki...@4ax.com...

This guy that has been trolling me has an inferior newsread. Don't listen
to him. He's an idiot.


Husky

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 3:10:30 PM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 2:10 pm, "who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> "Husky" <Cyns...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Better still, you should lay off the "Pipe."

Husky

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 3:31:11 PM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 2:15 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:33:32 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>

It's Violation of standard behavioral ethics clause. Ask Michael Vick
how that works.

Tamara

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 3:33:23 PM12/10/07
to
On 2007-12-08 18:10:34 -0500, hexHead® <hex...@msn.com> said:

> for all you Patsies fans, integrity means "no cheating"

Here it comes, all the sore loser bullshit!!!
Tamara

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 4:09:51 PM12/10/07
to
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:31:11 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 10, 2:15 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

And the NFL punished him for it. Now show me where the Steelers were
punished. If you can't then you're wrong.

Husky

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 4:35:12 PM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 4:09 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:31:11 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>

That's Convoluted Logic, A very silly statement on your part, and I'll
show you why; Show me where OJ was punished! Tell me you never broke
a speed limit and got away with it, without lying.
After all, they were very good cheaters. Getting away with something
doesn't mean you are innocent, but you already knew that.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 5:13:14 PM12/10/07
to
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:35:12 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 10, 4:09 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

OJ was found not guilty in criminal court so why would he by
punished?. He was found guilty in civil court and he is being
punished.

I've never been pulled over for speeding.

You're whining. The Steelers were guilty of nothing..that's not saying
their innocent.
But you knew that and you're just a whining FANATIC and you already
knew that.

Husky

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 5:14:39 PM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 2:10 pm, "who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> "Husky" <Cyns...@gmail.com> wrote in message

BTW, congratulations on making ACE! I knew you could do it! It was
just a mater of time.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 5:30:16 PM12/10/07
to
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:14:39 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 10, 2:10 pm, "who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

Your talking to my troll again idiot.

Husky

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 6:17:00 PM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 5:30 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:14:39 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>

There's no difference between you and him, Moron!

Husky

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 9:18:01 AM12/11/07
to
On Dec 10, 5:13 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:35:12 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>
Is that proof that he didn't break "Rules?"

>
> I've never been pulled over for speeding.

But you did break the "rule" about speeding, correct? Because you
weren't punished doesn't mean you didn't break the rule, but you
already knew that.
>


> You're whining. The Steelers were guilty of nothing..that's not saying
> their innocent.

You're arguing with yourself. They cheated, but weren't punished.
They're still cheaters


> But you knew that and you're just a whining FANATIC and you already
> knew that.

Keep up Sparky. You used the premise that because they weren't
punished, they didn't break rules. I clearly showed you examples
where rules were broken, yet no punishment was meted out.
You're going the Strawman route with everything you post.
Change your handle to Strawman.

Husky

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 10:56:56 AM12/11/07
to
On Dec 11, 10:12 am, who'sthat <whos...@IMamoronmmRight.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:18:01 -0800 (PST), Husky <Cyns...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
He's the Moron who believes if you don't receive punishment for an
Offense, No offense was committed! He is an ACE, though.

> >> OJ was found not guilty <snip>

>
> He committed no criminal offence.


Please, no responses necessary.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 12:59:31 PM12/11/07
to

"Husky" <Cyn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b73c741-2c9d-4eae...@w28g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

Actually, I've never broken the speed limit. I'm the guy you see driving in
the fast lane at 45 mph. In fact, I've never driven faster than 50. Now,
if there is a law against having sex with sheep, then yeah, I'm guilty.


MZ

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 1:03:23 PM12/11/07
to
"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
news:%cA7j.7222$AR7....@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...

>
> "Husky" <Cyn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> That's Convoluted Logic, A very silly statement on your part, and I'll
>> show you why; Show me where OJ was punished! Tell me you never broke
>> a speed limit and got away with it, without lying.
>
> Actually, I've never broken the speed limit. I'm the guy you see driving
> in
> the fast lane at 45 mph. In fact, I've never driven faster than 50. Now,
> if there is a law against having sex with sheep, then yeah, I'm guilty.

So you've dropped that excuse about just trying to help it over the fence,
huh?


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 1:09:56 PM12/11/07
to

"MZ" <ma...@void.nospam> wrote in message
news:TJWdnRQuhL1KTcPa...@giganews.com...

I used to use that one but nobody believed me. I wonder if it's because we
don't have a fence.


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 2:26:55 PM12/11/07
to

You answered the troll again dipshit.

MZ

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 2:27:20 PM12/11/07
to
"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
news:j3ptl3tso1n3fsl77...@4ax.com...

Sorry, I didn't know I wasn't allowed to talk to him.


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 2:37:53 PM12/11/07
to

"MZ" <ma...@void.nospam> wrote in message
news:waednX5Wr9UYecPa...@giganews.com...

Not until you upgrade your newsreader!


Husky

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 3:15:39 PM12/11/07
to
On Dec 11, 2:26 pm, who'sthat <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:03:23 -0500, "MZ" <m...@void.nospam> wrote:
> >"who'sthat" <whosthat@UKnowI'mmRight.com> wrote in message
> >news:%cA7j.7222$AR7....@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> >> "Husky" <Cyns...@gmail.com> wrote in message

> >>> That's Convoluted Logic, A very silly statement on your part, and I'll
> >>> show you why; Show me where OJ was punished! Tell me you never broke
> >>> a speed limit and got away with it, without lying.
>
> >> Actually, I've never broken the speed limit. I'm the guy you see driving
> >> in
> >> the fast lane at 45 mph. In fact, I've never driven faster than 50. Now,
> >> if there is a law against having sex with sheep, then yeah, I'm guilty.
>
> >So you've dropped that excuse about just trying to help it over the fence,
> >huh?
>
> You answered the troll again dipshit.

You're no better than him, in fact, you're "both" probably the same
"person." Both of "you" two Morons should STFU!

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Husky

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 3:43:51 PM12/11/07
to
On Dec 11, 3:30 pm, who'sthat <whosthat> wrote:
>I'm as dumb as dirt!

We finally agree!

0 new messages