Babylonian Talmud (Soncino Version) available for free download + Elizabeth Dilling commentaries and more
Craig Stevens
are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no further. This material is
free of charge and it has no pop-ups or advertising. It does not add files to your windows
directory etc. You can even install it on a USB thumb drive and carry nit with you so you can
show unbelievers what Jews teach about non-Jews and some of their medicinal remedies which are
a real hoot. Remember the Talmud is supposedly a book of great wisdom and is the centerpiece of
modern Judaism. http://www.come-and-hear.com/download.html
Here are some entries you can find and verify for yourselves;
http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_69.html
Gittin 69a
For swollen glands,8 R. Johanan said that pellitory leaves are as good as mamru9 and the root
of pellitory better than mamru, and he should put them in his mouth. This is to prevent it from
spreading. To soften it he should take bran that came to the top of the sieve and lentils with
the earth still on them and clover and hemlock flower and the bud of cuscuta, and he should put
about the size of a nut in his mouth. To make it burst, someone should blow into his throat
seeds of unripe dates, through a wheat straw. To make the flesh close he should bring dust from
the shadow of a privy and knead it with honey and eat. This is effective. For catarrh10 he
should take about the size of a pistachio of gum-ammoniac and about the size of a nut of sweet
galbanum and a spoonful of white honey and a Mahuzan natla11 of clear12 wine and boil them up
together; when the gum-ammoniac boils, it is all boiled enough. If he cannot manage this, let
him take a revi'ith of milk of a white goat
Gittin 69b
and let it drip on three stalks of carob and stir it with a piece of stem of marjoram; when the
stem of marjoram is boiled it is all boiled enough. He can also take the excrement of a white
dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog's
excrement as it loosens the limbs.
<STOP>
Any Jew could use the excrement of a white dog as a medicinal cure. Remember it has to be the
excrement of a white dog and not a black or brown dog. :-) And to think the Talmud is
allegedly Jewish High Wisdom.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_57.html
Sanhedrin 57a "'With respect to robbery — if one stole or robbed or [seized] a beautiful woman,
or [committed] similar offences, if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean against another,
[the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but
that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained'" ... 'For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a
Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an
Israelite, there is no death penalty'" ... But how can you say that such robbery by one Cuthean
from another is but a 'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since a Cuthean does not
forgive, is it not actual theft? — But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika answered; It applies to the
withholding of a labourer's wage. One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is
forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted."
Footnotes:
'Cuthean' (Samaritan) was here substituted by the censor for the original goy (heathen).
[I.e., though it is forbidden to rob the heathen (v. Yad, Genebah I, 2; VI, 8), the offence was
non-actionable. For reason, v. B. K. (Sonc. ed.) note on Mishnah 37b.]
<STOP>
Nice people the Jews. It's okay to withhold wages from a goy, it's okay to steal from a goy and
it is kosher to kill a goy but woe be to the goy who did likewise to a Jew.
In the following entry apologia is made for Jewesses to have sexual relations with dogs and not
suffer the death penalty lest there wouldn't be any women left for the priests to marry. Those
Talmudic Sages must have had a lot of bestiality in their community for them to author the
following claptrap.
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Yebamoth
Folio 59a
Rab Judah stated in the name of Rab: A woman who was subjected to unnatural intercourse is
disqualified from marrying a priest.36 Raba raised an objection: And she shall be his wife,37
applies to a woman eligible to marry him. This excludes [the marriage of] a widow38 to a High
Priest,39 of a divorced woman38 and a haluzah38 to a common priest. Now, how is one to
understand [the outrage]?40 If it be suggested that it was one of natural intercourse, what
[it may be asked] was the object of pointing to her widowhood41 when [her prohibition] could
be inferred from the fact that she had carnal intercourse with a man?42 Must it not
consequently [be assumed to be] a case of unnatural intercourse; and the only reason43 [why
the woman is forbidden44 is] because she is a widow, and not because she had had carnal
intercourse!45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
[...] Go to web page or download the Talmud to see all of the footnotes
45 Which proves that unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a
High Priest. How then could Rab state that a woman in such circumstances is forbidden?
Tractate List / Glossary / Search / Bible Reference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yebamoth 59b
— This1 represents the view of2 R. Meir,3 while Rab holds the same view as R. Eleazar.4 If
[Rab holds the same view] as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing to her previous carnal
intercourse5 when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the fact that she was a
harlot,6 R. Eleazar having stated that an unmarried man who cohabited with an unmarried woman
with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby a harlot!7 — R. Joseph replied:8 When, for
instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast, where the reason of 'previous
carnal intercourse' may be applied but not that of harlot.9 Said Abaye to him: Whatever you
prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be'ulah10 she must also be a harlot; and if
she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a be'ulah either! And were you to reply: This case is
similar to that of a wounded woman,12 [it may be pointed out] that if [the disqualification
should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also,13 you will find no woman eligible to marry
a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in some way wounded14 by a splinter!
No, said R. Zera,15 in respect of a minor who made a declaration of refusal.16
R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a
priest.17 Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human
being,18 though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of stoning,19 is nevertheless
permitted to marry a priest.20
When R. Dimi came21 he related: It once happened at Haitalu22 that while a young woman was
sweeping the floor23 a village dog24 covered her from the rear,25 and Rabbi permitted her to
marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest. But was there a High Priest in the days of
Rabbi?26 — Rather, [Samuel meant]: Fit for a High Priest.
Raba of Parzakaia27 said to R. Ashi: Whence is derived the following statement which the
Rabbis made: Harlotry is not applicable to bestial intercourse? — It is written, Thou shalt not
bring the hire of a harlot, or the price of a dog,28 and yet we learned that the hire of a
dog29 and the price of a harlot30 are permitted31 because it is said, Even both these,28
two only but not four.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
[...] Go to web page or download the Talmud to see all of the footnotes
6 Who is forbidden not only to a High Priest but also to a common priest (v. Lev. XXI, 7).
Why, then, did Rab refer to a High Priest only?
9 A term which is not applicable to bestial intercourse. V. infra.
10 [H] one who had experienced carnal intercourse.
11 Presumably because her act cannot be regarded as 'sexual intercourse'.
12 V. supra p. 394, n. 8. As in her case marriage with a High Priest is forbidden (v. our
Mishnah), though she is no harlot, so also in the case of bestial intercourse.
13 I.e., if injury to the anus is to be subject to the same restrictions as injury to the
hymen.
17 Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the
opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not so
regard such an intercourse either.
18 A beast.
19 If the offence was committed in the presence of witnesses after due warning.
20 In the absence of witnesses and warning.
23 Lit., 'house'.
24 Or 'big hunting dog' (Rashi), 'ferocious dog' (Jast.), 'small wild dog' (Aruk).
25 A case of unnatural intercourse.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<STOP>
That "When R. Dimi came21 he related: It once happened at Haitalu22 that while a young woman
was sweeping the floor23 a village dog24 covered her from the rear" is truly hilarious
especially when you see the footnote "24 Or 'big hunting dog' (Rashi), 'ferocious dog'
(Jast.), 'small wild dog' (Aruk)." The Jews even elaborate on the types of dogs mounting their
Jewesses from the rear or as they said giving them the splinter.
Remember the splinter?
R. Joseph replied:8 When, for instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast,
where the reason of 'previous carnal intercourse' may be applied but not that of harlot.9
Said Abaye to him: Whatever you prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be'ulah10
she must also be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a be'ulah either! And
were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman,12 [it may be pointed out]
that if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also,13 you will
find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in
some way wounded14 by a splinter!
Splinter is the Jewish Sage's code word for a dog penis.
Once again that last line "if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural
intercourse also, you will find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest [since there is not
one] who has not been in some way wounded by a splinter!"
IOW there wasn't one Jewess who had not been wounded by a splinter or in plain English
"unnatural intercourse" aka "intercourse with that which is no human being"
More Talmudic claptrap from New York City's Chabad Lubavitch Jews (These are the Jews who back
Hillary Clinton and they are the ones with the quaint hats and long side burns and beards).
http://www.mnemotrix.com/chabad/
"CB"N - ViewPoint: February 1998 ...Although the Jews are prohibited from speaking out against
idolatry in lands outside the land of Israel, we must keep in mind that this is our land, that
these are our people. The Bible is full of stories about what happens to Gentile lands that do
not enforce the prohibition of idolatry.
Why don't we direct our energies on doing something about the idolatry within our own land?
Christianity clearly violates the two primary Laws of the Torah, that of idolatry and
blasphemy.
We need to take action. We need to go on the offensive. We need to strive to establish
courts that uphold all of the Laws of Noah, not just a few of them. And maybe then, when the
Church is too busy trying to save its own idolatrous skin to worry about converting the Jews,
will they have the time to do other things, such as teach us the Sheva Mitzvot."
http://tinyurl.com/43nfx3
"CB"N - Moshiach ..Even within ka'al B'nei Noach we find individuals who still struggle to keep
their belief in Jesus intact. Instead of believing in the Gentiles' Jesus, they now believe in
a Jewish Jesus - and they now call him Yeshua HaMoshiach (Yeshua the Messiah). They strip away
the Christian's anglo-saxon garments of Jesus and redress him in a more ethnic Jewish costume.
Now Yeshua is introduced as an Orthodox rabbi, complete with tzitzits, tallit, and tefillin.
And by doing this to Jesus, they believe they have rectified the Church's whitewashing of a
Jewish Yeshua into a figure called Jesus, and that they have restored the truth to the
world..." http://tinyurl.com/5we3py
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+hwwBm3e7xrwwebxXDqFqGgrGo5BowDarnwBrnDtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html#hit1
"CB"N - The Covenant of Everlasting Life - The idea of everlasting life is rather appealing to
most folks... And now a personal observation, if you please: If (indeed, IF: hypothetical
speculation with such an example is, at best, an exercise of futility - the socio-historical
situation speaks for itself in the archives of Jewish history) the righteous Jews of the Second
Temple period had taught the Seven Laws of Noah to the non-Jews, there would never have risen a
religion such as Christianity. With the knowledge that (through the observance of the Sheva
Mitzvot B nei Noach) everlasting life could be attained as promised by Hashem to Noach, the
resulting fabrication that everlasting life could come only through belief and worship of a
human being would never have happened. Instead, as we have noted, the teaching concerning the
Covenant of the Rainbow - The Covenant of Everlasting Life, had been forced into hiding by the
vicious persecution of the Jews, and the new covenant of Christianity was but a pagan attempt
to replace the eternal Covenant made by Hashem to Noach..." http://tinyurl.com/67nlov
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+BwwBm3e3xt5ZyeODHwFqGgrGo5BowDarnwBrnDtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html#hit1
"Sincerity - I am Abraham s Servant - [A] Jew is a son of G-d whereas a non-Jew is intended to
be a servant of G-d. Although a Jew in essence is always a son, when he does not merit (to
manifest the essence of his Divine soul) he is also referred to as a... (4K) Excerpt: " With
the advent of Mashiach, all non-Jews will willfully serve (the Divine purpose of) the Jewish
people. Here lies the essence of the clarification in the mind of the non-Jew with regard to
the identity of the true Mashiach. As mentioned above, at present a very large percentage of
the non-Jewish world worships an individual Jew as god. The non-Jewish world must come to
recognize that all Jews are indeed sons of G-d. The non-Jew must strive to serve and help
G-d s children fulfill their purpose to bring redemption to the world. Then will
the true Mashiach reveal himself." http://tinyurl.com/bzemy
http://www.mnemotrix.com/texis/webinator/search3/+YwwBmeoxN1elkmdqekzbtqg5d1camoVoDnaDdDe2DqxiaTw5rowqrtFqnpwGwrFqmMwLozmxwwwMFqomxqrwxwm/context.html#hit1
Does everyone get the gist of the phrase "all non-Jews will willfully serve (the Divine
purpose of) the Jewish people" which is what they tried with their communism.
Perhaps this will make it clearer;
"...Communism, despite its flaws and corruptions, has had a profound effect on our sense of
social justice. Christianity, despite the horrendous atrocities it perpetrated and justified,
played a major role in introducing, to a largely pagan world, the concepts (though much
adulterated) of a one, omnipotent and non- corporeal G-d and of a messianic end-goal to
existence." http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/63558/jewish/IV-Wheres-the-Truth.htm
All of the above quoted from what Jewish Rebbes teach their nest of serpents.
More (downloadable) Talmudic hatred against non-Jews = gentiles = heathen = Cutheans = minim =
goy = goyim
http://www.come-and-hear.com/zarah/zarah_26.html
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate ‘Abodah Zarah
Folio 26a
MISHNAH. AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT ACT AS MIDWIFE TO A HEATHEN WOMAN, BECAUSE SHE WOULD BE
DELIVERING A CHILD FOR IDOLATRY. A HEATHEN WOMAN, HOWEVER, MAY ACT AS MIDWIFE TO AN ISRAELITE
WOMAN. AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT SUCKLE THE CHILD OF A HEATHEN, BUT A HEATHEN WOMAN MAY
SUCKLE THE CHILD OF AN ISRAELITE WOMAN IN HER PREMISES.
GEMARA. Our Rabbis taught: An Israelite woman should not act as midwife to heathen, because she
delivers a child to idolatry; nor may a heathen woman [be allowed to] act as midwife to an
Israelite woman because heathens are suspected of murder. This is the opinion of R. Meir. The
Sages, however, say: A heathen may act as midwife to an Israelite woman so long as there are
others standing by, but not if she is acting on her own.5 But R. Meir holds: Not even if
others are standing by her, for she may find an opportunity of pressing her hand on the
[infant's] temples and kill it without being observed; witness the incident of that woman who,
on being called by a neighbour 'Jewish midwife, the daughter of a Jewish midwife!' retorted,
'May as many evils befall that woman, as I have dropped [Jewish children] like lumps of wood
into the river.' Our Rabbis, however, say: No; she may have merely given her some kind of
retort.
AN ISRAELITE WOMAN SHOULD NOT SUCKLE etc. Our Rabbis taught: An Israelite woman should not
suckle a child of a heathen, because she rears a child for idolatry; nor should a heathen woman
[be allowed to] suckle a child of an Israelite woman, because she is liable to murder it. This
is the opinion of R. Meir. But the Sages say: A heathen may suckle a child of an Israelite
woman, so long as there are others standing by her, but not if she is on her own. R. Meir,
however, says: Not even while others are standing by her, for she may take the opportunity of
rubbing in poison on her breast beforehand and so kill the child. And both the above instances
are necessary; for if we were told about a midwife only [we might have thought that] only in
that case do the Sages permit, since, being observed by others, she could do no harm, but in
the case of suckling, where it is possible for her to apply poison to the breast beforehand and
so kill the child, they might agree with R. Meir. If [on the other hand] we were told only
about suckling, [we might have thought that] only in that case does R. Meir forbid, because she
could kill the child by applying poison to her breast beforehand, but in the case of a midwife,
where she could do no harm while others are standing by her, he might agree with the Rabbis;
[hence both are] necessary.
The following was cited in contradiction: A Jewish woman may act as midwife to a heathen woman
for payments but not gratuitously!...
<STOP>
http://www.come-and-hear.com/babakamma/babakamma_38.html
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Baba Kamma
The same has been taught as follows: If the ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there
is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite whether the ox [that
did the damage] was Tam or whether it had already been Mu 'ad, the payment is to be in full
<STOP>
Gentiles never have equality in the Jewish system of things.
In closing here is what the Jewish Talmud teaches about Jesus and deceased Christians.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_56.html
http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_57.html
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Gittin
Folio 56b
Onkelos son of Kolonikos20 was the son of Titus's sister. He had a mind to convert himself to
Judaism. He went and raised Titus from the dead by magical arts, and asked him; 'Who is most in
repute in the [other] world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He
said: Their observances are burdensome and you will not be able to carry them out. Go and
attack them in that world and you will be at the top as it is written, Her adversaries are
become the head21 etc.; whoever harasses Israel becomes head. He asked him:
Folio 57a
What is your punishment [in the other world]? He replied: What I decreed for myself. Every day
my ashes are collected and sentence is passed on me and I am burnt and my ashes are scattered
over the seven seas. He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He asked him: Who is in
repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He
replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever.1 He then
asked: What is your punishment? He replied: With boiling hot semen.2 He then went and raised
by incantations the sinners of Israel.3 He asked them: Who is in repute in the other world?
They replied: Israel. What about joining them? They replied: Seek their welfare, seek not their
harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. He said: What is your punishment? They
replied: With boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the
Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement.
Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files
1 Deut. XXIII, 7.
2 Because he enticed Israel to go astray after the daughters of Moab. V. Sanh. 106a.
3 [MS.M. Jesus].
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_106.html
Sanh. 106a
A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! — R. Johanan said: At first he was a prophet, but
subsequently a soothsayer.41 R. Papa observed: This is what men say, 'She who was the
descendant of princes and governors, played the harlot with carpenters.'42
Footnotes:
41 As a punishment for wishing to curse Israel he was degraded from a prophet to a soothsayer.
42 'Shipdraggers,' (v. Rashi). Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p. 48, suggests that Balaam
is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus (v. also pp. 64-70). Though no name is
mentioned to shew which woman is meant, the mother of Jesus may be alluded to, which theory is
strengthened by the statement that she mated with a carpenter.
Sanhedrin 106b
Did the children of Israel slay with the sword among them that were slain by them.1 Rab
said: They subjected him to four deaths, stoning, burning, decapitation and strangulation.2
A certain min3 said to R. Hanina: Hast thou heard how old Balaam was? — He replied: It is not
actually stated, but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half
their days,4 [it follows that] he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.5 He rejoined:
Thou hast said correctly; I personally have seen Balaam's Chronicle, in which it is stated,
'Balaam the lame was thirty years old when Phinehas the Robber killed him.'6
Footnotes:
6 [According to the view that all the Balaam passages are anti-Christian in tendency, Balaam
being used as an alias for Jesus, Phinehas the Robber is thus taken to represent Pontius
Pilatus, and the Chronicle of Balaam probably to denote a Gospel (v. Herford op. cit. 72ff.).
This view is however disputed by Bacher and others: cf. Ginzberg, Journal of Biblical
Literature, XLI, 121.]
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_107.html
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin
Folio 107a
Footnotes:
II Kings V, 27. The uncensored edition continues: What of R. Joshua b. Perahjah? — When King
Jannai slew our Rabbis, R. Joshua b. Perahjah (and Jesus) fled to Alexandria of Egypt. On the
resumption of peace, Simeon b. Shetach sent to him: 'From me, (Jerusalem) the holy city, to
thee, Alexandria of Egypt (my sister). My husband dwelleth within thee and I am desolate.' He
arose, went, and found himself in a certain inn, where great honour was shewn him. 'How
beautiful is this Acsania!' (The word denotes both inn and innkeeper. R. Joshua used it in the
first sense; the answer assumes the second to be meant.) Thereupon (Jesus) observed, 'Rabbi,
her eyes are narrow.' 'Wretch,' he rebuked him, 'dost thou thus engage thyself.' He sounded
four hundred trumpets and excommunicated him. He (Jesus) came before him many times pleading,
'Receive me!' But he would pay no heed to him. One day he (R. Joshua) was reciting the Shema',
when Jesus came before him. He intended to receive him and made a sign to him. He (Jesus)
thinking that it was to repel him, went, put up a brick, and worshipped it. 'Repent,' said he
(R. Joshua) to him. He replied, 'I have thus learned from thee: He who sins and causes others
to sin is not afforded the means of repentance.' And a Master has said, 'Jesus the Nazarene
practised magic and led Israel astray.' For a full discussion of this passage and attempted
explanation of this anachronism making Jesus a contemporary of King Jannai (104-78 B.C.E.). v.
Herford, op. cit. 51ff. [The tradition of an early Jesus was also known to Epiphanius. Whether
he derived this tradition from the Talmud or from an independent source is a moot point hotly
contested by Klausner and Guttmann; v. MGWJ. 1931, 250ff. and 1933, 38. In any case there does
not appear to be sufficient data available to account for this tradition.]
==============================================================================================
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt01.html
from The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling
I.
THE PHARISEES, THE TALMUD,
AND MODERN JUDAISM
Bible scholars are aware that Jesus Christ denounced the Pharisees. He said they nullified all
the Commandments of God by their Tradition, "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men"
(Mark 7:13; Matt. 15:6-9, etc.). His invective, in truth, cannot be equalled. All of Matthew 23
is like a whiplash. He likened Pharisaism to a whited sepulchre, indeed beautiful outwardly,
but "inside full of dead men's bones and of all uncleanness." Christ climaxed one condemnation
after another with the expletive, "Hypocrites!" He called the Pharisees children of them that
killed the Prophets. He foretold they would go on killing, crucifying and persecuting until the
guilt for all the righteous blood shed from Abel on down would be upon them. "Ye serpents, ye
generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" Christ asked.
Christ is as utterly devastating of Pharisaism in the record of John 8. Although He admitted
that His hearers were descendants of Abraham, He said they were, spiritually, of the devil.
Christ told them:
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer
from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because the truth is not in him. When he
speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it (John 8:44).
The Missing Link
"But," says the disinterested Christian, "what has that to do with us today? What a group of
Pharisees did two thousand years ago is over and done with!"
However, the missing link in Christian understanding on the subject of "Pharisees" is best
supplied by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943):
The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the
centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature
of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest
and most important single piece of that literature … and the study of it is essential for any
real understanding of Pharisaism.
Concerning the Pharisees, the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia says:
With the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.) the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the
regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth, Jewish life was
regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic
point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of
tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition (Abot 1:1). Pharisaism shaped the character
of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future. (See Exhibit 264 herein.)
Historically speaking, scripture believers had accepted Christ as the Messiah foretold. They
were no longer "Jews," but called themselves "Christians." They were persecuted as such by the
Pharisees. The word "Pharisee" comes from the word "separated." (See Exhibit 300.)
The Babylonian Talmud, Sole Authority
You may ascertain by turning to top Jewish authorities today that the Babylonian Talmud, the
written form of the Tradition of the Pharisees, is the sole authority of the so-called "Jewish"
religion, or Judaism.
Rabbi Louis Finklestein was chosen in 1937 by the Kehillas (Jewish communities) of the World as
one of the top 120 Jews best representing "a lamp of Judaism" to the World, together with Maxim
Litvinov (Finklestein), the Communist Commissar and bank robber terrorist; atheist communist
Albert Einstein; those indefatigable Marxist reds, Harold Laski and his friend Felix
Frankfurter (U.S. Supreme Court Justice) who shared honors with Rabbi Finklestein and others.
Finklestein has long headed the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, with branches in New
York and Los Angeles. In his two-volume work "The Pharisees." Rabbi Finklestein writes:
Pharasaism became Talmudism … But the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When
the Jew … studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian
academies. From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy. Spain, France
and Germany; from these to Poland. Russia and Eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharasaism has
wandered. (See Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, and Exhibit 3 herein.)
In Rabbi Finklestein's history of the Jews, he states:
The Talmud derives its authority from the position held by the ancient academies. (i.e.
Pharisee) The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of Palestine. were considered
the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin . . . At the present time, the Jewish people
have no living central authority comparable in status to the ancient Sanhedrins or the later
academies. Therefore, any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be based on the Talmud as
the final resumé of the teaching of those authorities when they existed.
[page 2] (The Jews — Their History, Culture, and Religion , Vol. 4, p. 1332, Jewish Publication
Society of America, 1949).
"The Talmud: Heart's Blood of the Jewish Faith," was the heading of a November, 1959,
installment of a bestselling book by the Jewish author, Herman Wouk, which ran serially in the
New York Herald-Tribune.
To quote:
The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws,
customs or ceremonies we observe — whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely
spasmodic sentimentalists — we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.
Why Was It So Often Burned?
Why is the Talmud kept so unknown to non-Jews? Why was there no usable English translation of
the Talmud until the Soncino Edition, 1934-48? Why, in European history, when the laws of the
Talmud became commonly known, was it burned over and over by order of the Popes, excoriated by
Martin Luther, denounced everywhere, and its followers exiled from one country after another
down through the centuries?
The Talmud's basic law is that only the Pharisee Jew ranks as a man, or human being. All others
rank as animals, "the people who are like an ass — slaves who are considered the property of
the master." The attitude resulting from such teachings has been resented by non-Jews in all
countries and centuries. Such resentment, however, is always portrayed by Jews as "persecution
of the Jews."
Moses, on the contrary, was most insistent upon having one law for the stranger and for the
"home-born" and in teaching that the stranger must not be oppressed. (Exodus 12:49; Lev. 24:22,
Num. 9:14; 15:15-16, 29, etc.) In fact, he ordered: "Love ye therefore the stranger; for ye
were strangers in the land of Egypt." (Deu. 10:19) It was only the abominators he warned
against.
Babylonian Talmud — The Law
The Babylonian Talmud is the law for so-called Judaism. However, its pornographic, anti-Gentile
and anti-Christian doctrines have often caused hostility against it. It may then be argued by
some Jews that there is a Palestinian Talmud which is innocuous. Nevertheless, you may look up
the fact that Jewish authorities state it was lost for a thousand years, has missing parts and
lacks the "Gemara" and other essentials, and is only used as a scholar's curiosity. Note the
statement of British Chief Rabbi Hertz in his foreword to the Soncino edition of the Babylonian
Talmud (Exhibit 33):
The Palestinian Talmud … was for many centuries almost forgotten by Jewry. Its legal decisions
were at no time deemed to possess validity, if opposed by the Babylonian Talmud.
Was Christ Just to Pharisees?
Without some knowledge of the written form of the "Tradition of the Pharisees," the Babylonian
Talmud, one is unable to intelligently judge whether Jesus Christ was fair and just in His acid
denunciations of Pharisaism, or not. One needs proof, offered by the irrefutable exhibits from
Jewish authorities (set forth elsewhere herein) that the Talmud reverses every one of the Ten
Commandments, the teachings of Moses and the Prophets, and enshrines their opposites under a
"whited sepulchre" which is a disguise for murder and "all uncleanness," as Christ charged.
Murder of non-Pharisees is always permitted; theft, sodomy, incest, rape are all permitted. For
example, the righteousness of grown men violating baby girls under three is a favorite topic
for discussion in book after book of the Talmud.
Talmudic literature is one long paean of praise for the very name Babylon, and all that it
means to Babylonian Talmudism today, whereas it is a term of reproach in Old and New
Testaments.
Note the Foreword to the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud by the late Chief
Rabbi of Great Britain, J.H. Hertz, who, like Rabbi Finklestein, was one of the 120 Jews chosen
in 1937 by the Kehillas of the World as best holding up the "lamp of Judaism:"
The beginnings of Talmudic literature date back to the time of the Babylonian Exile in the
Sixth pre-Christian Century … When a thousand years later, the Babylonian Talmud assumed final
codified form in the year 500 after the Christian era, the Roman Western Empire had ceased to
be. (See Exhibit 30).
Rabbi Hertz extolls the Babylonian Exile, saying: "The Babylonian Exile is a momentous period …
During that Exile Israel found itself. It … rediscovered the Torah and made it the rule of life
…"
What he really means is that it was discovered how the Torah or Bible could be used as a
"whited sepulchre" for Babylonian degeneracy, as even a cursory study will reveal.
One Rabbi Akiba was a First Century Talmud "sage," of whom Moses was even supposedly jealous!
(See Exhibit 32). Rabbi Hertz lauds Rabbi Akiba (Exhibit 32):
Akiba was the author of a collection of traditional laws out of which the Mishna actually grew.
He was the greatest among the rabbis of his own and of succeeding times … His keen and
penetrating intellect enabled him to find a Biblical basis for every provision of the Oral Law.
Still enthusing over the Babylonian derivation of Pharisaism, Rabbi Hertz continues (See
Exhibit 34):
When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealing with what most people understand when
they speak or write of the Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an autonomous Jewish center
for a longer period than any other land; namely from soon after 586 before the Christian era to
the year 1040 after the Christian Era — 1626 years. (Exhibit 34)
[page 3] You will note in reproductions of Talmud pages that the word "Gemara" designates the
argumentation of the rabbis, the ultimate decision being summarized as the "Mishnah."
Bible Versus Oral Law (Talmud)
The Bible under Talmudic Judaism is considered to be a collection of simple tales fit only for
fools, women and children. The Talmud "sages" thus must find new meanings in it by letter and
number tricks which reverse the plain meaning and create out of it the permission to do
otherwise forbidden crimes and misdeeds. The words of the Bible are continually misused and
misquoted for purposes of blasphemy and reversal.
Stealing for themselves the title of "Israelites," the Talmud "sages" teach that "God made a
covenant with Israel only for the sake of that which was transmitted orally." (See Exhibit 60)
And the Biblical "basis" of this is given as Exodus 34:27. But that verse states, instead: "And
the Lord said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have
made a covenant with thee and with Israel" — the opposite! (Talmud, Gittin 60b, See Exhibit
204) The Talmudic reversal of Moses' written words are said to have been transmitted "orally,"
and through Moses himself — believe it or not!
Bearing in mind that the Scribes were the Pharisee teachers of the Law of Moses, carefully
distorted to comprise the Talmud, note: "There is greater stringency in respect to the
teachings of the Scribes than in respect to the Torah … so that a Biblical law may be
transgressed." (Talmud, Sanhedrin 88b, see Exhibit 95).
The Torah in its narrow sense is the Old Testament, and in a still narrower meaning the first
five books (Pentateuch) of Moses. In its wider Judaistic use it means the Old Testament as
misinterpreted by the Pharisaic Talmud. Always with Judaism the Talmud ranks above the Bible in
every way.
Not reproduced here is a Talmud passage from the book of Nedarim (vows) of which Exhibit 170 is
the title page. The Soncino edition of the Talmud states (page 107):
As will be seen on 37a, Scripture was generally regarded as the study of children only, adults
usually investigating the deeper meaning … From this we see that it was usual to teach the
Bible to girls in spite of the Talmudic deduction that daughters need not be educated (Kid.
30a). The opposition of Rabbi Eliezer to teaching the Torah to one's daughter (Sotah 20a "He
who teaches his daughter Torah is as though he taught her lewdness.") was probably directed
against the teaching of the Oral Law, and the higher branches of study (V. Maimonides Yad.
Talmud Torah) … The context shows that the reference is to the higher knowledge of Biblical
law.
The Talmud (Sanhedrin 59a, See Exhibit 60), states:
A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death for it is written, Moses commanded us a law for
an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs.
Reference is also made to the "Noachian laws" which the non-Jew may study "but not laws which
do not pertain to them." Also: " … (the) objection was to the studying of the Oral Law … Rabbi
Johanan feared the knowledge of Gentiles in matters of Jurisprudence, as they would use it
against the Jews in their opponents' courts." Understandably, since all Talmud laws
discriminate against the non-Jew and rank him a virtual animal, these were apt observations.
The Jewish Encyclopedia is still more open about what is in Sanhedrin 59a of the Talmud, above,
threatening death for revelation of "Torah" laws to Gentiles: "for such knowledge might have
operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts." This observation follows a dissertation
on the laws on cheating and getting the best of Gentiles in trade and in court. (See Exhibit
271, left column)
Craig Stevens
<craig_...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote:
I have download this set of files and it is very useful and well executed. All of you Goy who
are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no further. This material is
free of charge and it has no pop-ups or advertising. It does not add files to your windows
directory etc. You can even install it on a USB thumb drive and carry nit with you so you can
show unbelievers what Jews teach about non-Jews and some of their medicinal remedies which are
a real hoot. Remember the Talmud is supposedly a book of great wisdom and is the centerpiece of
modern Judaism. http://www.come-and-hear.com/download.html
Supplemental to the above.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/index.html
The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling
Elizabeth Dilling was a widely known critic of Judaism prior World War II until her death in
1967. In writing Jewish Religion, Ms. Dilling chose her research materials with care. Her
primary source, the Soncino Talmud, was produced by the finest scholars of Judaism. The
Rodkinson Talmud was a monumental work endorsed by Rabbi I. M. Wise, a pioneer of Reform
Judaism. Rabbi Dr. Louis Finkelstein, author of The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of
Their Faith, became president of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America shortly after his
book was published, where he was remained for more than 30 years. Thus, Ms. Dilling's research
spanned the best that Conservative, Orthodox, and Reform Judaism had to offer in the English
language. She also drew from the 12-volume Jewish Encyclopedia, which, though a century old,
still stands as a monument to Jewish mainstream scholarship; the 10-volume Universal Jewish
Encyclopedia from the early 1940's; US Government State Department Records, The American Hebrew
periodical, and other publications.
More on Elizabeth Dilling —
Foreword from The Plot Against Christianity
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/whois.html
Foreword from The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/dcontents.html#foreword
Come and Hear™ is proud to present the full text of The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today,
here, on line. In this book, Elizabeth Dilling presents a Christian's critique of the Talmud as
it interprets Biblical teachings. The printed book contains hundreds of photocopied exhibits
and references into the Soncino Babylonian Talmud and the King James Bible, encyclopedias,
State Department papers, periodicals, the Soncino Talmud, and rabbinical writings. We have used
the second edition of this scholarly 1963 classic, with scanned images of all her exhibits and
hotlinks into the source text of each, wherever they could be located.
The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
Detailed Table of Contents
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/dcontents.html
Key chapters of vital interest;
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt01.html
The Pharisees, the Talmud, and Modern Judaism
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt03.html
The Talmud and Bible Believers
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt04.html
Judaism — Anti-Gentilism and Exploitation of Non-Jews
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt05.html
Talmudic Immorality, Asininity and Pornography: The Reprobate Mind
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt10.html
Jews God's "Chosen"?
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt11.html
The Jews and Marxism — Socialism — Communism
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt12.html
The Jews and the Communization of Russia
Complete Dilling text (no exhibits) also available in PDF format for ease of download, reading,
and printing--> http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/jriit.pdf
Also relevant and of interest;
http://www.come-and-hear.com/supplement/index.html
Supplementary Materials
http://www.come-and-hear.com/supplement/ajn-hayman/ajn-page.html
Christianity Equals Anti-Semitism
This is a real shocker;
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
Sex with Children by Talmud Rules
Chris C. Larson
wrote:
> On Mon, 05 May 2008 08:05:23 -0500, <cmpt1453btptvgvsgh9ql71ipq2f09s...@4ax.com> Craig Stevens
>
> <craig_stev...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote:
>
> I have download this set of files and it is very useful and well executed. All of you Goy who
> are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no further. This material is
Or if you aren't fat, lazy and living off the government dole like
Bradbury here, you could actually live, work with and socialize with
Jews and find out for yourselves. Like most people would.
Chris C. Larson
>
> <craig_stev...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote:
>
> I have download this set of files and it is very useful and well executed. All of you Goy who
> are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no further. This material is
Or...
You could live with work with, and socialize with Jews like normal
people and decide for yourself. Of course, if you want some
unemployed, obese, greasy haired bigot to tell you the "truth", then
folllow Bradbury's Rabinical Studies above <smile>
Truth Will Out
"Chris C. Larson" <larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3caf332e-2962-4aac...@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On May 6, 4:02 pm, Craig Stevens <craig_stev...@no-reply-wanted.net>
wrote:
> On Mon, 05 May 2008 08:05:23 -0500,
> <cmpt1453btptvgvsgh9ql71ipq2f09s...@4ax.com> Craig Stevens
>
> <craig_stev...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote:
>
> I have download this set of files and it is very useful and well executed.
> All of you Goy who
> are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no
> further. This material is
Or...
You could live with work with, and socialize with Jews like normal
people and decide for yourself.
Can you imagine a world with 6 billion people, all thinking and acting like
Jews?
It would last about a month before it self-destructed.
Chris C. Larson
wrote:
> "Chris C. Larson" <larsonchris...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:3caf332e-2962-4aac...@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
says another one who has not met any Jews. Get out of the house Truth.
The mold from your trailer must be killing you.
Aviroce
keep smelling on their middles. Donkeys have long and thick organs
for fat Jews and oxen have long and thin organs for petite Jews.
Animals and Jews have common relation-bestiality.
On May 6, 8:57 pm, "Truth Will Out" <Truthwillout@all_times.net>
wrote:
> "Chris C. Larson" <larsonchris...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:3caf332e-2962-4aac...@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Craig Stevens
Baby boys may always be used as subjects for sodomy by grown men, according to the Talmud. The
Pharisaic subterfuge here is that until a child reaches sexual maturity, capable of sexual
intercourse, he or she does not rank as a person, hence Biblical laws against sodomy
(pederasty) do not apply. Throughout the Talmud "nine years and one day" is the fictitious age
of male maturity.
Sanhedrin 54b
Our Rabbis taught: In the case of a male child, a young one is not regarded as on a par
with an old one; but a young beast is treated as an old one.23 What is meant by this? — Rab
said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child
above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a
child above that.24 What is the basis of their dispute? — Rab maintains that only he who is
able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt
[upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a
passive subject of pederasty [in that respect].25
Footnotes:
23 The reference is to the passive subject of sodomy. As stated supra 54a, guilt is incurred
by the active participant even if the former be a minor, i.e., less than thirteen years old.
Now, however, it is stated that within this age a distinction is drawn.
24 I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of
lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
25 At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.
-----------------------------------------------------
Likewise, under "nine years and one day," the "first stage of intercourse" of a boy with the
mother, or any grown woman, is harmless, Talmudically. Shammai, to seem more "strict," lowers
the age to eight years in some cases. (See Sanhedrin 69b of the Talmud)
Sanhedrin 69b
Our Rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son [a minor], and he
committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, — Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her
unfit to the priesthood. Beth Hillel declare her fit. R. Hiyya the son of Rabbah b. Nahmani
said in R. Hisda's name; others state, R. Hisda said in Ze'iri's name: All agree that the
connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less
than eight years is not: their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old, Beth Shammai
maintaining, We must base our ruling on the earlier generations, but6 Beth Hillel hold that we
do not.
---------------
"When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is
less than this — that is, less than three years old — it is as if one puts the finger into the
eye — tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl
under three years." (Kethuboth 11b of the Talmud)
Kethuboth 11b
GEMARA. Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up
woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood. When I said it before Samuel
he said: 'Injured by a piece of wood' does not apply to flesh. Some teach this teaching by
itself: [As to] a small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up woman. Rab said, he makes her
[as though she were] injured by a piece of wood; whereas Samuel said: 'Injured by a piece of
wood' does not apply to flesh. R. Oshaia objected: WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN HAS HAD INTERCOURSE WITH
A LITTLE GIRL, OR WHEN A SMALL BOY HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP WOMAN, OR WHEN A GIRL WAS
ACCIDENTALLY INJURED BY A PIECE OF WOOD — [IN ALL THESE CASES] THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED
[ZUZ]; SO ACCORDING TO R. MEIR. BUT THE SAGES SAY: A GIRL WHO WAS INJURED ACCIDENTALLY BY A
PIECE OF WOOD — HER KETHUBAH IS A MANEH! Raba said, It means this: When a grown-up man has
intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this,6 it is as
if one puts the finger into the eye;7 but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up
woman he makes her as 'a girl who is injured by a piece of wood,' and [with regard to the case
of] 'a girl injured by a piece of wood,' itself, there is the difference of opinion between R.
Meir and the Sages.
Rami b. Hama said: The difference of opinion is [only] when he knew her, for R. Meir compares
her11 to a mature girl, and the Sages compare her to a woman who had intercourse with a man.
But if he did not know her, all agree that she has nothing. And why does R. Meir compare her to
a mature girl? Let him compare her to a woman who had intercourse with a man! — [In the case
of] a woman who had intercourse with a man, a deed had been done to her by a man; but in her
case — no deed has been done to her by a man. — And why do the Rabbis compare her to a woman
who had intercourse with a man? Let them compare her to a mature girl! [In the case of] a
mature girl no deed whatsoever has been done to her, but in her case — a deed has been done to
her.
Footnotes:
6 Lit., 'here', that is, less than three years old.
7 I.e., tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little
girl under three years. Cf. Nid. 45a.
-------------------------------------
This is the standard doctrine of the whole Talmud on baby girls. Sodomy and intercourse with
babies is the prerogative of the adult Talmudic man, in contrast to Christ's beautiful
teachings concerning little children.
The following is also typical concerning the fictitious age of sexual maturity of baby girls
set by the Pharisee "sages:" "A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage
by coition …" (Sanhedrin 55b), (Sanhedrin 69a-69b), (Yebamoth 57b), and (Yebamoth 60b); also
Niddah 44b.
Sanhedrin 55b
A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her
deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be
incurred through her; [if a niddah] she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in
turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with
gonorrhoea].5 If she married a priest, she may eat of terumah; If any unfit person7 has a
connection with her, he disqualifies her from the priesthood — If any of the forbidden degrees
had intercourse with her, they are executed on her account, but she is exempt.
Sanhedrin 69a-69b
R. Jeremiah of Difti said: We also learnt the following: A maiden aged three years and
a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabited
with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; [if a niddah,]
she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he
lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with gonorrhoea]. If she married a
priest, she may eat of terumah; if any unfit person cohabits with her, he disqualifies her from
the priesthood. If any of the forbidden degrees had intercourse with her, they are executed on
her account, but she is exempt. Our Rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son
[a minor], and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, — Beth Shammai say, he
thereby renders her unfit to the priesthood.4 Beth Hillel declare her fit. R. Hiyya the son
of Rabbah b. Nahmani said in R. Hisda's name; others state, R. Hisda said in Ze'iri's name: All
agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that
of one less than eight years is not:5 their dispute refers only to one who is eight years
old, Beth Shammai maintaining, We must base our ruling on the earlier generations, but6 Beth
Hillel hold that we do not.
Yebamoth 57b
Raba said, We also learned a similar Baraitha: A girl who is three years of age and one
day may be betrothed by cohabitation; if a levir cohabited with her, he has thereby acquired
her; one incurs through her the guilt of intercourse with a married woman; she defiles her
cohabitor in respect of his imparting defilement to the lower, as well as to the upper couch;
if she was married to a priest she may eat terumah, and anyone ineligible who cohabited with
her causes her ineligibility. Thus only a girl of the age of three years and one day, who is
rendered ineligible by cohabitation, is also rendered ineligible through the bridal chamber;
but a girl younger than three years and one day, who is not rendered ineligible by
cohabitation, is not rendered ineligible through the bridal chamber either.
Yebamoth 60b
It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under the age of three
years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children
that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phinehas surely was
with them. And the Rabbis?16 — [These were kept alive] as bondmen and bondwomen. If so, a
proselyte whose age is three years and one day should also be permitted! — [The prohibition is
to be explained] in accordance with R. Huna. For R. Huna pointed out a contradiction: It is
written, Kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him, but if she hath not known,
save her alive; from this it may be inferred that children are to be kept alive whether they
have known or have not known [a man]; and, on the other hand, it is also written, But all the
women children, that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, but do
not spare them if they have known. Consequently it must be said that Scripture speaks of one
who is fit for cohabitation.
----------------------------
And, at three, a baby girl is always rated as "one who is fit for cohabitation — that is one
who has attained the age of three years and one day." (Talmud, Yebamoth 60b) But, in the case
of a baby girl who is not Jewish-born, or a so-called "proselyte," she may be "married" thus by
a grown priest: "A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to
marry a priest;" although "one who is fit for cohabitation," as stated on the same page, is
"one who has attained the age of three years and one day."
This Talmud Yebamoth passage continues with the ruling in the case of a baby under three
married to a grown man priest, and declared eligible to continue as his wife. The baby girl was
a "proselyte," of course, so age did not matter. But "under eleven years and one day" a little
girl "carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner." (See Yebamoth 12b of the Talmud)
Yebamoth 12b
R. Bebai recited before R. Nahman: Three [categories of] women may use an absorbent in
their marital intercourse: A minor, a pregnant woman and a nursing woman. The minor, because
[otherwise] she might12 become pregnant, and as a result13 might die. A pregnant woman,
because [otherwise]. she might cause her foetus to degenerate into a sandal. A nursing woman,
because [otherwise] she might have to wean her child prematurely and this would result in his
death. And what is the age of such a minor? From the age of eleven years and one day until the
age of twelve years and one day. One who is under, or over this age must carry on her marital
intercourse in the usual manner. This is the opinion of R. Meir. The Sages, however, say: The
one as well as the other carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner, and mercy will
be vouchsafed from heaven, for it is said in the Scriptures The Lord preserveth the simple.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thus, once again do the Pharisees make the commandments of God of "none effect" as Christ said.
(Matthew 15:6, Mark 7:13)
<STOP>
I have downloaded this set of files and they are very useful and well executed. All of you Goy
who are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no further. This material
is free of charge and it has no pop-ups or advertising. It does not add files to your windows
directory etc. You can even install it on a USB thumb drive and carry it with you so you can
show unbelievers what Jews teach about non-Jews and some of their medicinal remedies which are
a real hoot. Remember the Talmud is supposedly a book of great wisdom and is the centerpiece of
modern Judaism. http://www.come-and-hear.com/download.html
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/index.html
The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling
Elizabeth Dilling was a widely known critic of Judaism prior World War II until her death in
1967. In writing Jewish Religion, Ms. Dilling chose her research materials with care. Her
primary source, the Soncino Talmud, was produced by the finest scholars of Judaism. The
Rodkinson Talmud was a monumental work endorsed by Rabbi I. M. Wise, a pioneer of Reform
Judaism. Rabbi Dr. Louis Finkelstein, author of The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of
Their Faith, became president of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America shortly after his
book was published, where he was remained for more than 30 years. Thus, Ms. Dilling's research
spanned the best that Conservative, Orthodox, and Reform Judaism had to offer in the English
language. She also drew from the 12-volume Jewish Encyclopedia, which, though a century old,
still stands as a monument to Jewish mainstream scholarship; the 10-volume Universal Jewish
Encyclopedia from the early 1940's; US Government State Department Records, The American Hebrew
periodical, and other publications.
More on Elizabeth Dilling —
Foreword from The Plot Against Christianity
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/whois.html
Foreword from The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/dcontents.html#foreword
Come and Hear™ is proud to present the full text of The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today,
here, on line. In this book, Elizabeth Dilling presents a Christian's critique of the Talmud as
it interprets Biblical teachings. The printed book contains hundreds of photocopied exhibits
and references into the Soncino Babylonian Talmud and the King James Bible, encyclopedias,
State Department papers, periodicals, the Soncino Talmud, and rabbinical writings. We have used
the second edition of this scholarly 1963 classic, with scanned images of all her exhibits and
hotlinks into the source text of each, wherever they could be located.
The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
http://www.come-and-hear.com/supplement/index.html
Supplementary Materials
Excerpts
HE WHO COMMITS SODOMY WITH A MALE OR A BEAST, AND A WOMAN THAT COMMITS BESTIALITY ARE STONED.
(Sanhedrin 54a) However, if a grown man were to have sexual relations with a boy younger than
nine, the man would incur no guilt.
Leviticus 18:22 prohibits a man lying with a man, but not with a young boy. Thus the Talmud
Sages reason: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty …
Sanhedrin 54b
Young Girl http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/baby6.jpg
In the world of the Talmud Sages, grown men have sexual intercourse with girls younger than
three years old. The young girls are wounded and bleed from the activity, but the Talmud Sages
were of the opinion that in one so young, virginity comes back: "Intercourse with her is like
putting a finger in the eye," (Niddah 44b) and the tears come back again and again. Apparently
the Sages attributed the repeated bleeding during copulations to the repeated rupture of the
regenerated hymen.
"… Of Lesser Age, No Guilt is Incurred"
In modern America, sex between an adult and a child is condemned in proportion to the youth of
the child. That is, Americans generally consider sex with a fifteen year old, a twelve year
old, a six year old, and a three-year-old on a continuous scale of condemnation. The younger
the child, the greater the condemnation.
Talmudic law works on the reverse scale: sex with younger children is less significant than sex
with older children. How did this doctrine come about?
Scripture states thus:
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
— Leviticus 18:22 (KJV)
The Old Testament prohibits a man lying with a man; but notice, the Old Testament does not
prohibit a man lying with a boy. Thus, the Talmud Sages arrive at their position on pederasty.
In the following, bestiality said to be committed "naturally" when a man uses the vaginal
passage of the beast, and "unnaturally" when a man uses the anal passage of the beast. The
Sages make a similar distinction for the couplings of a woman with a beast.
GEMARA. … Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty
with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated
as with a child above that. (2) What is the basis of their dispute? — Rab maintains that only
he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw
guilt [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse
cannot be a passive subject of pederasty [in that respect]. (3) But Samuel maintains: Scripture
writes, [And thou shalt not lie with mankind] as with the lyings of a woman. (4)
It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; [55a]
[he] who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally; or a woman who causes herself to
be bestially abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment. (5)
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 54b - 55a
The translator, Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman, amplifies the text with footnotes. Note particularly
footnote 2: "… but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred."
See also the final sentence of footnote 5: "… nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the
passive partner for the adult to be liable." (See Soncino Talmud Glossary for definition of
Baraitha.)
2 I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser
age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
3 At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.
4 Lev. XVIII, 22. Thus the point of comparison is the sexual matureness of woman, which is
reached at the age of three.
5 (Rashi reads [H] instead of the [H] in our printed texts. A male, aged nine years and a day
who commits etc.] There are thus three distinct clauses in this Baraitha. The first — a male
aged nine years and a day — refers to the passive subject of pederasty, the punishment being
incurred by the adult offender. This must be its meaning — because firstly, the active offender
is never explicitly designated as a male, it being understood, just as the Bible states, Thou
shalt not lie with mankind, where only the sex of the passive participant is mentioned; and
secondly, if the age reference is to the active party, the guilt being incurred by the passive
adult party, why single out pederasty: in all crimes of incest, the passive adult does not
incur guilt unless the other party is at least nine years and a day? Hence the Baraitha
supports Rab's contention that nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner
for the adult to be liable.
— Rabbi Dr. Freedman
The plain English meaning of the Talmud text is clear, but if there is any doubt, the Soncino
scholars put the matter to rest: No guilt is incurred with a boy child younger than nine, even
in incest.
Adult Male Homosexuality
MISHNAH. HE WHO COMMITS SODOMY WITH A MALE OR A BEAST, AND A WOMAN THAT COMMITS BESTIALITY ARE
STONED. — Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 54a
This clears matters up. Consenting adults who engage in homosexuality suffer the death penalty.
But homosexuality with a male child under the age of nine years and a day is not punishable
(Sanhedrin 54b-55a). Recall Rabbi Dr. Freedman's clear statement of the doctrine: I.e., Rab
makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt
is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
<STOP>
Strange people with strange teachings.
Perverted Jewish circumcison tradition.
http://www.jewishledger.com/articles/2006/02/23/news/news02.txt
"In metzitzah b'peh, a mohel orally sucks blood from the site of the genital cut he makes
during the circumcision procedure."
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/std/std-bris.shtml
Communicable Disease : NYC DOHMH
Before the Bris: How to Protect Your Infant Against Herpes Virus Infection
Caused by metzitzah b'peh
Circumcision has health benefits. Recently, however, the Health Department
has documented several cases of herpes infection in newborns after
circumcisions that included metzitzah b'peh. Metzitzah b'pehis a religious
practice performed by some mohelim (religious circumcisers) in the Jewish
community. Some of these infants became seriously ill. One baby died, and
another suffered brain damage.
Because there is no proven way to reduce the risk of herpes infection posed
by metzitzah b'peh, the Health Department recommends that infants being
circumcised not undergo metzitzah b'peh.
To help you protect your baby, we want to make sure that parents understand
the risk of metzitzah b'peh BEFORE the day of the bris, while there is time
to explore other options.
How metzitzah b'peh spreads herpes
In metzitzah b'peh, the mohel places his mouth on the freshly circumcised
penis to draw blood away from the cut.
If the mohel is infected with oral herpes (as most adults are), metzitzah b'peh
can expose the infant to the herpes virus.... <STOP>
http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/mohel.htm
Shabbath 19:2
They may perform on the Sabbath all things that are needful for circumcision: excision,
tearing, sucking [the wound], and putting thereon a bandage and cumin. If this had not been
pounded up on the eve of the Sabbath a man may chew it with his teeth and then apply it.
The Mishnah
Translated by Herbert Danby
Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1933. pp. 116-117.
Shabbat 133B
II.1.
A. Suck [out the wound]:
B. Said R. Pappa, "A Surgeon who didn't suck out the wound - that is a source of danger, and we
throw him out."
C. So what else is new? Obviously, since we are prepared to desecrate the Sabbath on that
account, it is certainly dangerous not to do it!
D. What might you have supposed? That this blood is stored up. So we are informed that it is
the result of the wound, and in the status of a bandage and cumin: Just as when one doesn't put
on a bandage and cumin, there is danger, so here, too, if one doesn't do it, there is danger.
The Talmud of Babylonia: An American Translation
Translated by Jacob Neusner
Number 275. Volume II.E: Shabbat Chapters 18-24.
Program in Judaic Studies Brown University
Atlanta: Scholars Press. 1993. p. 45.
"There are three stages required for the performance of a ritually correct circumcision in
Jewish law: the removal of the foreskin; the tearing of the underlying membraene so as to
expose the glans completely; and the sucking away of the blood, m'tsitsah." Roger V. Pavey. The
Kindest Cut of All. Bognor Regis, W. Sussex: New Horizon. 1981. pp. 87-88.
"The method to be adopted is laid down thus: 'One excises the foreskin, [that is] the entire
skin covering the glans, so that the corona is laid bare. Afterwards, one tears with the
finger-nail the soft membrane underneath the skin, turning it to the sides until the flesh of
the glans appears. Thereafter, one sucks the membrane until the blood is extracted from the
[more] remote places, so that no danger [to the infant] may ensue; and any circumciser who does
not carry out the sucking procedure is to be removed [from his office].' . . . The operation
itself, then, consists of three distinct acts: the excision of the prepuce; the laceration of
the mucous membrane covering the glans; and the sucking of the blood from the interior of the
wound." Immanuel Jakobovits. Jewish Medical Ethics: A Comparative and Historical Study of the
Jewish Religious Attitude to Medicine and Its Practice. New York: Bloch Publishing Company.
1959. pp. 193-194.
"The baby cried, blood flowed on to his penis and - as the rabbi had predicted - Graham [the
godfather] did not faint. The rabbi then bent over the baby and sucked the wound. I know this
sounds awful, but it is part of the Jewish tradition. It's supposed to help the healing." Jack
Shamash. "My Son on the Cutting Edge." Independent (London), no. 3,797 (Thursday, December 17,
1998): p. R8.
"And what of the practice of sucking the bleeding penis? While condemning the procedure, some
physicians contend that it was used to stop bleeding. Not only is there little evidence for
this theory, but it was also a largely ineffective method. Furthermore, even in antiquity,
surgeons had better methods to stop bleeding, such as pressure, instruments, and medication.
According to Dr. H. Speert (1953), Maimonides 'staunchly supported this procedure [sucking the
bleeding penis] as a prophylactic measure against inflammation.'" Edward Wallerstein.
Circumcision: An American Health Fallacy. New York: Springer Publishing Company. 1980. p. 160.
"mezizah -- Hebrew term for the third step in the Jewish circumcision ritual, in which the
mohel applies his mouth to the freshly circumcised infant's penis and sucks up the first drops
of blood. In more recent times this procedure has been carried out via a tube, as infections,
venereal disease, and tuberculosis, sometimes resulting in the death of the infant, have
occurred due to contamination of the wound. Most Jewish circumcisors today have eliminated this
step from the circumcision ritual. Critics have attributed sadistic and homosexual implications
to this practice, while defenders claim that this was simply all that was known during ancient
times to stop the bleeding." Rosemary Romberg. Circumcision: The Painful Dilemma. South Hadley,
Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey, Publishers, Inc. 1985. p. 395.
"The traditional practice of metzitzah b'peh, which has its roots in the earliest history of
the Jewish people and has survived unchanged to the present time, should be viewed with great
respect. It is spoken of very positively in the Jewish literature on circumcision both as an
essential part of the ritual and as a health measure which prevents infection and promotes
healing." Henry C. Romberg, M.D. Bris Milah: A book about the Jewish ritual of circumcision.
Jerusalem/New York: Feldheim Publishers. 1982. pp. 57-58.
<STOP>
alittlesanity
Craig Stevens <craig_...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote:
[...]
For a refutation of alleged "quotes" from the Talmud, see
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/:
"Response to anti-Semites' posting of Talmud 'Quotes'
and other anti-Semitic fabrications and distortions".
Craig Stevens
Barry what was quoted was not out of context and I gave full access to Talmudic texts so
everyone may see so themselves. Also people can go to a large city library and verify the texts
for themselves. I find it amazing that I just posted what I did and you Jewish spin doctors pop
up immediately to attempt damage control. Sorry but more and more people are seeing you
deceivers for what you are.
From: Craig Stevens <craig_...@no-reply-wanted.net>
Subject: Jewish Talmud teaches sodomy on young boys is permissable if they are less than 9
years and 1 day old + More Talmudic filth & depravity
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 06:09:44 -0500
Chris C. Larson
wrote:
>
> read more »
Bradbury:
OK, I'll play or should I say, waddle along:
Name 1 Jewish person who has done any of these things. Not the entire
Jewish population as you imply, or 250,000. Not 17,498, 2,499, 587, 17
or 5. Just 1.
Craig Stevens
<rati...@nospam.com> wrote:
I just clicked you link Barry and it was dead. I discovered you made a mistake in posting a
colon in the URL. If one removes the colon then one may visit the damage control website
Jews have devised.
Here is the working link: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/
Goy David S. Maddison starts out by telling a lie and it is "Much of anti-Semitism appears to
have its origins in the supposed belief that Jews must intrinsically hate Christianity and
humanity in general. Of course, this is not true..."
Here are some teachings which prove David S. Maddison lied above;
"CB"N - ViewPoint: February 1998 ...Although the Jews are prohibited from speaking out against
idolatry in lands outside the land of Israel, we must keep in mind that this is our land, that
these are our people. The Bible is full of stories about what happens to Gentile lands that do
not enforce the prohibition of idolatry.
Why don't we direct our energies on doing something about the idolatry within our own land?
Christianity clearly violates the two primary Laws of the Torah, that of idolatry and
blasphemy.
We need to take action. We need to go on the offensive. We need to strive to establish
courts that uphold all of the Laws of Noah, not just a few of them. And maybe then, when the
Church is too busy trying to save its own idolatrous skin to worry about converting the Jews,
will they have the time to do other things, such as teach us the Sheva Mitzvot."
http://tinyurl.com/43nfx3
Here is David Maddison again "Much of anti-Semitism appears to have its origins in the supposed
belief that Jews must intrinsically hate Christianity and humanity in general. Of course, this
is not true..."
"CB"N - Moshiach ..Even within ka'al B'nei Noach we find individuals who still struggle to keep
their belief in Jesus intact. Instead of believing in the Gentiles' Jesus, they now believe in
a Jewish Jesus - and they now call him Yeshua HaMoshiach (Yeshua the Messiah). They strip away
the Christian's anglo-saxon garments of Jesus and redress him in a more ethnic Jewish costume.
Now Yeshua is introduced as an Orthodox rabbi, complete with tzitzits, tallit, and tefillin.
And by doing this to Jesus, they believe they have rectified the Church's whitewashing of a
Jewish Yeshua into a figure called Jesus, and that they have restored the truth to the
world..." http://tinyurl.com/5we3py
"CB"N - The Covenant of Everlasting Life - The idea of everlasting life is rather appealing to
most folks... And now a personal observation, if you please: If (indeed, IF: hypothetical
speculation with such an example is, at best, an exercise of futility - the socio-historical
situation speaks for itself in the archives of Jewish history) the righteous Jews of the Second
Temple period had taught the Seven Laws of Noah to the non-Jews, there would never have risen a
religion such as Christianity. With the knowledge that (through the observance of the Sheva
Mitzvot B nei Noach) everlasting life could be attained as promised by Hashem to Noach, the
resulting fabrication that everlasting life could come only through belief and worship of a
human being would never have happened. Instead, as we have noted, the teaching concerning the
Covenant of the Rainbow - The Covenant of Everlasting Life, had been forced into hiding by the
vicious persecution of the Jews, and the new covenant of Christianity was but a pagan attempt
to replace the eternal Covenant made by Hashem to Noach..." http://tinyurl.com/67nlov
"Sincerity - I am Abraham s Servant - [A] Jew is a son of G-d whereas a non-Jew is intended to
be a servant of G-d. Although a Jew in essence is always a son, when he does not merit (to
manifest the essence of his Divine soul) he is also referred to as a... (4K) Excerpt: " With
the advent of Mashiach, all non-Jews will willfully serve (the Divine purpose of) the Jewish
people. Here lies the essence of the clarification in the mind of the non-Jew with regard to
the identity of the true Mashiach. As mentioned above, at present a very large percentage of
the non-Jewish world worships an individual Jew as god. The non-Jewish world must come to
recognize that all Jews are indeed sons of G-d. The non-Jew must strive to serve and help
G-d s children fulfill their purpose to bring redemption to the world. Then will
the true Mashiach reveal himself." http://tinyurl.com/bzemy
Does everyone get the gist of the phrase "all non-Jews will willfully serve (the Divine
purpose of) the Jewish people" which is what they tried with their communism.
Perhaps this will make it clearer;
"...Communism, despite its flaws and corruptions, has had a profound effect on our sense of
social justice. Christianity, despite the horrendous atrocities it perpetrated and justified,
played a major role in introducing, to a largely pagan world, the concepts (though much
adulterated) of a one, omnipotent and non- corporeal G-d and of a messianic end-goal to
existence." http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/63558/jewish/IV-Wheres-the-Truth.htm
All of the above quoted from what Jewish Rebbes teach their nest of serpents. All of the above
can be verified using key word serches at this link: http://www.mnemotrix.com/chabad/
I invite everyone to go to that search page and enter searches for Jesus or Christian and see
what you get. A search for Jesus turned up this gem;
"Thank you Chabad - Jesus was not the Messiah. Now he says he works toward getting other Jews
like himself to return to Yiddishkeit. It was a truly inspiring story. This story was
distributed over the Internet and somehow reached my... Excerpt: " It was a story about Jack, a
"Jewish-Christian missionary" who worked to convert Jews to Christianity until he was convinced
by you and other Jews on the Internet that Judaism was truly the "correct" religion and that
Jesus was not the Messiah."
That smacks of antichristism.
"Young children, it is the last hour, and, just as you have heard that antichrist is coming,
even now there have come to be many antichrists. Who is the liar if it is not the one that
denies that Jesus is the Christ? These things I write you about those who are trying to mislead
you! For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as
coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist. If anyone comes to you and does
not bring this teaching, never receive him into your homes or say a greeting to him. For he
that says a greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works."
1 John 2:18,22,23 ; 2 John 7,10,11
More Jewish antichristism;
"The Laws Concerning Mashiach - Every Day: Studies by the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem M.
Schneerson (shlita) on the Rambam's Conception of Mashiach and the Ultimate Redemption. These
chapters conclude the final section (Hilchos Melachim -... The translation of this classic text
which Sichos In English presents herewith is not only new, but - unlike almost all of the
extant printed editions, even in the Hebrew original - unexpurgated. All the passages
suppressed by various medieval Christian censors have been translated in full. They appear here
in the footnotes that are keyed to the exact positions from which they were deleted. At this
point, before being censored by medieval Christian authorities, the Rambam's original text
continued: "..and save Israel from the hand's of Esav's descendants. This and two other such
deletions have been copied verbatim in these footnotes from the celebrated Yemenite manuscript
in the hands of Chacham Yosef Kapach of Jerusalem. (See footnotes 4 and 5, below.)] "Can there
be a greater stumbling block than [Christianity]? All the prophets spoke of Moshiach as the
redeemer of Israel and their savior, who would gather their dispersed ones and strengthen their
[observance of] the mitzvos. In contrast [the founder of Christianity] caused the Jews to be
slain by the sword, their remnants to be scattered and humiliated, the Torah to be altered, and
the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the L-rd." "How will this come
about? The entire world has already become filled with talk of [the supposed] Messiah, as well
as of the Torah and the mitzvos."
Here is David Maddison again "Much of anti-Semitism appears to have its origins in the supposed
belief that Jews must intrinsically hate Christianity and humanity in general. Of course, this
is not true..."
I'll Always Be Here
news:315324lt2k5kvajcb...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 7 May 2008 11:20:54 +0000 (UTC), <fvs3am$q41$1...@pcls6.std.com> a
> little sanity, please <rati...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <ke33249mgvm10jhb5...@4ax.com>,
>>Craig Stevens <craig_...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>For a refutation of alleged "quotes" from the Talmud, see
>>http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/:
>>"Response to anti-Semites' posting of Talmud 'Quotes'
>>and other anti-Semitic fabrications and distortions".
>
> Barry what was quoted was not out of context and I gave full access to
> Talmudic texts so everyone may see so themselves. Also people can go to
> a large city library and verify the texts for themselves. I find it
> amazing that I just posted what I did and you Jewish spin doctors pop
> up immediately to attempt damage control. Sorry but more and more people
> are seeing you deceivers for what you are.
So your attempt at spinning is okay, everyone elses is some horrible
attempt at damage control. You didn't even read the response link, did
you?
And I see that you are still obsessed with Barry and Ron. You can get
pills for that.
You are, afterall, a good christian.
I'll Always Be Here
42 minutes earlier you are talking about spin control and you hadn't even
read the link. You are a typical christian...non-judgemental and loving
your brother.
Craig Stevens
"I'll Always Be Here" <aussi...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>Craig Stevens <craig_...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote in
>news:315324lt2k5kvajcb...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 7 May 2008 11:20:54 +0000 (UTC), <fvs3am$q41$1...@pcls6.std.com> a
>> little sanity, please <rati...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <ke33249mgvm10jhb5...@4ax.com>,
>>>Craig Stevens <craig_...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>For a refutation of alleged "quotes" from the Talmud, see
>>>http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/:
>>>"Response to anti-Semites' posting of Talmud 'Quotes'
>>>and other anti-Semitic fabrications and distortions".
>>
>> Barry what was quoted was not out of context and I gave full access to
>> Talmudic texts so everyone may see so themselves. Also people can go to
>> a large city library and verify the texts for themselves. I find it
>> amazing that I just posted what I did and you Jewish spin doctors pop
>> up immediately to attempt damage control. Sorry but more and more people
>> are seeing you deceivers for what you are.
>
>
>So your attempt at spinning is okay, everyone elses is some horrible
>attempt at damage control. You didn't even read the response link, did
>you?
The link you provided didn't work and me being the true sport I am investigated. You adding a
colon to the URL made it unworkable. I even provided the working link in another reply and I
pointed out David S. Maddison lied right from the beginning. I showed documents which prove he
is just a spin doctor and nothing more. I will admit there are people who will deliberately
make up quotes which they claim come from the Talmud and don't. I provided the means so anyone
can download a searchable Talmud for themselves to see it some of the quotes floating around
are true. I figure I don't want to do such and that by showing what the Talmud really shows is
for more beneficial.
>And I see that you are still obsessed with Barry and Ron. You can get
>pills for that.
But you are Barry Shein. BTW I see you went from "a little sanity" to
"I'll Always Be Here."
"a little sanity" posts from Barry Shein's ISP he owns and now you forget who you are and
follow up as "I'll Always Be Here" which I assume is another Shein sock puppet.
>You are, afterall, a good christian.
You make the claim not I.
Craig Stevens
"I'll Always Be Here" <aussi...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I did read the link and in fact the link you provided was not workable! I even
provided the working link and I commented on your spin doctor David S. Maddison
opening with a big lie as the above proves and which you didn't bother to read.
>You are a typical christian...non-judgemental and loving your brother.
A typical Christian does not have brothers who are antichrists. A true Christian
exposes and denounces anti-Christs. You and your fellow Jews who reject Jesus is
the Messiah who came min the flesh are the true antichrists. Why would I want to
have "communion" with you and yours?
Example of one of millions of antichrists dwelling in America;
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 21:55:49 -0500
Message-ID: <catamont-CFBE3C...@news.giganews.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/fff52eca83b894a3
> May I ask if you acknowledge Jesus is the Christ or Messiah who
> came in the flesh?
I've answered it three times already. And since I happen to be Jewish,
why would you think I would believe any such thing?
Sara
The Biblical definition of an antichrist;
"Young children, it is the last hour, and, just as you have heard that antichrist is coming,
even now there have come to be many antichrists. Who is the liar if it is not the one that
denies that Jesus is the Christ? These things I write you about those who are trying to mislead
you! For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as
coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist. If anyone comes to you and does
not bring this teaching, never receive him into your homes or say a greeting to him. For he
that says a greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works."
1 John 2:18,22,23 ; 2 John 7,10,11
Key scriptural passage "For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not
confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist" which
fits Jewess Salzman's reply of "And since I happen to be Jewish, why would you think I would
believe any such thing?" when asked "May I ask if you acknowledge Jesus is the Christ or
Messiah who came in the flesh?"
Remember folks these Jews are antichrists, Christ Haters and true enemies of Christianity.
To quote antichrist Jewess Salzman again;
"[T]he fact that a Communist is anti-Christian makes perfect sense, since
Marx called religion the "opiate of the people."" - Sara Salzman
Message-ID: <schwartz-ya023180...@news.infinet.com>
"I have never made an "imflammatory" [sic] attack on Communism. I have never
made ANY attack on Communism." - Sara Salzman
Message-ID: <schwartz-ya023180...@news.infinet.com>
To quote Jewish Rabbis again;
"...Communism, despite its flaws and corruptions, has had a profound effect on our sense of
social justice. Christianity, despite the horrendous atrocities it perpetrated and justified,
played a major role in introducing, to a largely pagan world, the concepts (though much
adulterated) of a one, omnipotent and non- corporeal G-d and of a messianic end-goal to
existence." http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/63558/jewish/IV-Wheres-the-Truth.htm
Now I still say outright David S. Maddison is a liar and a deceiver when he makes such claims
as "Much of anti-Semitism appears to have its origins in the supposed belief that Jews must
I'll Always Be Here
Now kkkramer, I didn't post any links...you should get new eyeglasses and
maybe a remedial reading course.
> You adding a colon to the URL made it unworkable.
Ah, poor baby, if I was going to post a link for you to follow, I'd make
sure you could follow it. I wouldn't want to be accused of christian-
baiting.
I even
> provided the working link in another reply and I pointed out David S.
> Maddison lied right from the beginning.
I really don't read past your first mistakes kkkramer. The laughter makes
it impossible.
I showed documents which prove
> he is just a spin doctor and nothing more. I will admit there are people
> who will deliberately make up quotes which they claim come from the
> Talmud and don't.
Just like you make up headers which you claim come from me, but don't. You
are indeed a good christian.
I provided the means so anyone can download a
> searchable Talmud for themselves to see it some of the quotes floating
> around are true. I figure I don't want to do such and that by showing
> what the Talmud really shows is for more beneficial.
>
>>And I see that you are still obsessed with Barry and Ron. You can get
>>pills for that.
>
> But you are Barry Shein. BTW I see you went from "a little sanity" to
> "I'll Always Be Here."
I see that you've gone from B.Cramer to Craig Stevens.
>
> "a little sanity" posts from Barry Shein's ISP he owns
So you're saying that an ISP should only have one client to make you
happy?
and now you
> forget who you are and follow up as "I'll Always Be Here" which I assume
> is another Shein sock puppet.
.You know what they say about kkkramers who assume.
>
>>You are, afterall, a good christian.
>
> You make the claim not I.
And I mean it from the bottom of my heart. You are the stereotypical good
christian. Too bad you'll never be the Good Christian.
I'll Always Be Here
Nicely done. You lie while telling the truth. Your post about reading the
link was 42 minutes after you had already demonized it.
> I even provided the working link and I commented on your spin doctor
> David S. Maddison opening with a big lie as the above proves and which
> you didn't bother to read.
I don't have any spin doctors...don't need them...I'm not christian.
>
>>You are a typical christian...non-judgemental and loving your brother.
>
> A typical Christian does not have brothers who are antichrists.
Au Contraire.
> A true Christian exposes and denounces anti-Christs.
No, a True Christian is non-judgemental and does good works.
> You and your fellow Jews who reject Jesus is the Messiah who came min
> the flesh are the true antichrists.
You christians that are judgemental and don't do good works are the anti-
christs. Fortunately for us who don't believe in fairy tales, you will
have to live with your evil ways and as you die you will suffer for all
your sins.
> Why would I want to have "communion" with you and yours?
You wouldn't because you are a true christian and judgemental. YOu by the
very nature of your beliefs, believe that you are better than anyone else.
And I say that you are the true anti-christ. And this is of course true.
alittlesanity
Craig Stevens <craig_...@no-reply-wanted.net> wrote:
> "a little sanity" posts from Barry Shein's ISP
So what does that prove? Thousands of people have accounts
in that ISP. Do you also assume that everyone who posts from
AOL is the President of AOL? Sheesh.
I'll Always Be Here
@pcls6.std.com:
All that holy water has given kkkramer an infection.
Mirelle
Craig Stevens wrote:
> I have download this set of files and it is very useful and well executed. All of you Goy who
> are curious about the Neo-Pharisees teach about us need to look no further. This material is
> free of charge and it has no pop-ups or advertising. It does not add files to your windows
> directory etc. You can even install it on a USB thumb drive and carry nit with you so you can
> show unbelievers what Jews teach about non-Jews and some of their medicinal remedies which are
> a real hoot. Remember the Talmud is supposedly a book of great wisdom and is the centerpiece of
> modern Judaism. http://www.come-and-hear.com/download.html
Thanks, Craig.
I am downloading it right now.
Mirelle
> the final resum� of the teaching of those authorities when they existed.