WHO WROTE THIS IN MY BOOK?
RBRK
SOME CHARLATAN WROTE IT AND IS SAYING THAT I WROTE IT
001.001
YUSUFALI: In the name of RBRK, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: In the name of RBRK, the Beneficent, the Merciful.
SHAKIR: In the name of RBRK, the Beneficent, the Merciful.
001.002
YUSUFALI: Praise be to RBRK, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;
PICKTHAL: Praise be to RBRK, Lord of the Worlds,
SHAKIR: All praise is due to RBRK, the Lord of the Worlds.
001.003
YUSUFALI: Most Gracious, Most Merciful;
PICKTHAL: The Beneficent, the Merciful.
SHAKIR: The Beneficent, the Merciful.
001.004
YUSUFALI: Master of the Day of Judgment.
PICKTHAL: Master of the Day of Judgment,
SHAKIR: Master of the Day of Judgment.
001.005
YUSUFALI: Thee do we worship, and Thine aid we seek.
PICKTHAL: Thee (alone) we worship; Thee (alone) we ask for help.
SHAKIR: Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help.
001.006
YUSUFALI: Show us the straight way,
PICKTHAL: Show us the straight path,
SHAKIR: Keep us on the right path.
001.007
YUSUFALI: The way of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace, those
whose (portion) is not wrath, and who go not astray.
PICKTHAL: The path of those whom Thou hast favoured; Not the (path) of
those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray.
SHAKIR: The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed favors. Not (the
path) of those upon whom Thy wrath is brought down, nor of those who go
astray.
DO YOU GET IT? heehee
arash...@yahoo.com
SCI)
These parasites who constantly spread anti-Iran hate messages are not
humans, they are well trained "Sayanim", also known as the "Mossad's
little helpers".
Sometimes they post messages as a "Zoroastrian" (Fake Zoroastrians),
who really really 'love' Iran/Persia!
Sometimes they post messages as an anti-arab (Fake arab-haters), who
really really 'love' Iran/Persia!
Sometimes they post messages as "Opposition Groups", all of which are
connected to the Western Intelligence.
Sometimes they post messages as a defender of "Zahra Kazemi", a filthy
"CSIS" agent.
Sometimes they post messages as a defender of Western
'Democracy' (colonialism).
Sometimes they post messages as supporter of dropping nuclear weapons
on "Qum", as though, city of Qum is located in Europe!
Sometimes they post messages as defenders of murdering of Iranian
Basjis and Sepahis (who bravely defended their homeland), as though,
Basjis are Russians!
Sometimes they post messages as supporters of Bush, because he wants
nothing but 'FREEDOM' for Iran!
http://www.bushspeaks.com/img/bloody_iraqi_child.jpg
Am I Free Yet, Bush!
Shock and Awe Plan Against Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5f498031b564aaa6
Bush Plan: Nuke Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0f6e4a32e83baa05
Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations 2005
http://www.nukestrat.com/us/jcs/jp.htm
And the most hilarious of all is that sometimes they post messages as
supporters of Israel, because Jews hate arabs, so this means they just
'love'! Iran/Persia so so very much!
British Jew Bernard Lewis proposed the dismemberment of Iran as early
as 1979
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1a601d2b216ff87d
Jew Edward Nicolae Luttwak push for break-up of Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3d1f0b79b05e42a1
'American Jewish Committee' pimps war with Iran: The following advert
appeared in the Financial Times UK
http://208.42.237.17/Repository/getimage.dll?path=FTU/2006/04/05/11/Img/Pg011.png&GZ=T
AIPAC pimps war with Iran: The video and maps below are intended to
help you better understand the escalating threat that is Iran's
pursuit of nuclear weapons
http://www.aipac.org/iran/nuclear_status/escalating_threat.html
Jewish-American Enterprise Institute (AEI) gives support to anti-Iran
terrorists
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/39d298a97ef6ffc8
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5b0804a24ef94611
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/28f23677e3eecb01
Another War for Israel: The amen corner howls for war with Iran
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8663
Jews wants Iran decimated soon, no more excuses!
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/4442df271397453b
What really happened to the Shah of Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3e88a5bb7ccb3e42
Understanding the Jew demons behind the 1979 coup
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/09e844840aa4f006
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confessions of an ex-Mossad agent: "Victor Ostrovsky"
http://www.eaec.org/dove/dove1990aw/Victor%20Ostrovsky.jpg
Excerpt from Victor Ostrovsky's, "By way of deception" (1990).
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971759502?v=glance
... The Mossad - believe it or not - has just 30 to 35 case officers,
or katsas, operating in the world at any one time. The main reason for
this extraordinary low total, as you will read in this book, is that
unlike other countries, Israel can tap the significant and loyal cadre
of the worldwide Jewish community outside Israel. This is done through
a unique system of "Sayanim", volunteer Jewish helpers.
By Way of Deception describes the shocking scope and depth of the
Mossad's influence, disclosing how Jewish communities in the U.S.,
Europe, and South America are armed and trained by the organization in
secret "self-defense" units, and how Mossad agents facilitate the drug
trade in order to pay the enormous costs of its far-flung, clandestine
operation. http://www.victorostrovsky.com/books.html
Among other kinds of dirty tricks in which Mossad also specializes,
Ostrovsky asserts that it doctored the file of then-UN Secretary-
General Kurt Waldheim to implicate him in Nazi crimes. The doctored
file subsequently was "discovered" by then-Israeli Ambassador to the
United Nations Benyamin Netanyahu to smear Waldheim. The reason?
Israel was unhappy with Waldheim's criticism of Israeli activities in
southern Lebanon.
Mossad at one time decided to assassinate President George Bush when
the president was in Madrid at the end of October 1991 for the opening
of Arab-Israeli peace talks; because the American president had frozen
U.S. loan guarantees to Israel. Evidence was to be manufactured
implicating the Palestinians. Eventually, however, the assassination
plot was called off, for reasons Ostrovsky does not explain.
Mossad divides outside Jews into 3 categories:
1) First are the "Sayanim", volunteer spies for Israel.
2) Second is the "Israel lobby", which follows Mossad's guidance.
3) Third is "B'nai B'rith", which can be relied upon to "tarnish as
anti-semites
whomever they can't sway to the Israeli cause".
The other side of deception: a rogue agent exposes the Mossad's secret
agenda
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0495/9504058.htm
Victor Ostrovsky's website
http://www.victorostrovsky.com/the_man.html
Operation Trojan
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/deception.html
I was there when the Americans bombed
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/iwasthere.html
Sayanim", volunteer spies for Israel
http://judicial-inc.biz/Sayanim.htm
Victor Ostrovsky
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Way_of_Deception
No matter what you do for Jews and no matter how assiduously you toady
to their interests, they will never respect yours. "Victor Ostrovsky",
Mossad.
Sayan = Millions of Jew-spies around the World.
Katsa = Mossad case officer
kidon = Jew assassins
Misgerot or "frames" = Jew armed groups in other countries.
Vaudat Orchim = Millions of Jew broadcasters, publishers, editors,
writers, and
bloggers who spread lies.
OCCUPIED AMERICA - Part I
--------------------------------
SAYANIM
--------------
I dimly recall quite a fuss back in 1959 (I was quite young then)
about Jack Kennedy and the question of "dual loyalty". The media
declared loudly and publicly that many people questioned whether
Kennedy owed his first allegiance to the United States, or to the
Vatican.
Even at the tender age of 12, this descendant of Cromwell's round-
heads thought concern about loyalty to the Pope a bit overblown.
The Pope seemed a "lord spiritual" in every respect, lacking any of
the normal appurtenances of a "lord temporal", such as a standing
army. Indeed, if one listened to the Pope or any of his Bishops, it
was awfully hard to discern any worldly objective which a president of
that faith might entertain that conflict with the worldly interests of
the United States.
After all, the Vatican did not receive $5 billions per year in aid
from the U.S. Treasury.
Indeed, it was hard to understand why a Catholic should be treated
differently from a Methodist or Presbyterian. Kennedy's religion (or
lack thereof) seemed far more relevant to the question of his
character and the kinds of moral values that might weigh in his
decisions. The temporal interests of Rome seemed a bit distant.
Further, conspiracies cannot be concealed for long, and there was no
hard evidence of any such thing by the Catholic Church.
Not so with the Jews!
There clearly is at least one international conspiracy, and it is run
directly by the State of Israel.
Here is a short quote from the book "By Way of Deception" by Victor
Ostrovsky (St. Martin's, 1990), formerly a Colonel in the Israeli
intelligence service "Mossad".
Beginning on page 86:
"The next day Ran S. delivered a lecture on the sayanim, a unique and
important part of the Mossad's operation. Sayanim - assistants - must
be 100% Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not lsraeli
citizens, many are reached through their relatives in Israel.
An Israeli with a relative in England, for example, might be asked to
write a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an
organization whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the
diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way?
"There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone,
there are about 2000 who are active, and another 5000 on the list.
They fulfill many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running
a rental agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to
complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find
accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could get you
money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan
would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so
on. The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can
provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the
cause. They are paid only costs".
Continuing on page 87
"Suppose during an operation a katsa suddenly had to come up with an
electronics store as a cover. A call to a sayan in that business could
bring 50 television sets, 200 VCRs - whatever was needed - from his
warehouse to your building, and in next to no time, you'd have a store
with $3 or $4 million worth of stock in it".
"Since most Mossad activity is in Europe, it may be preferable to have
a business address in North America. So, there are address sayanim and
telephone sayanim. If a katsa has to give out an address or a phone
number, he can use the sayan's. And if the sayan gets a letter or a
phone call, he will know immediately how to proceed. Some business
Sayanim have a bank of 20 operators answering phones, typing letters,
faxing messages, all a front for the Mossad".
And on page 88:
"Katsas in the stations are in charge of the sayanim, and most active
sayanim will be visited by a katsa once every three months or so,
which for the katsa usually means between two and four face-to-face
meetings a day with Sayanim, along with numerous telephone
conversations. The system allows the Mossad to work with a skeleton
staff. That's why, for example, a KGB station would employ about 100
people, while a comparable Mossad station would need only six or
seven."
On page 221, Ostrovsky gives an example of what a Sayan can be
expected to do for Israel's Mossad:
"The Mossad already had considerable information about the Exocet,
thanks in part to a Sayan who worked at Aerospatiale and had passed
along details. They had also conducted a small operation, sending a
team to break into the plant accompanied by a missile expert flown in
from Israel for the occasion. He was taken into the plant "with
handles", and materials brought to him for his expert opinion. His
task was to determine what they should photograph. The team spent four
and a half hours inside the plant before leaving without a trace".
It is a crime, a felony, for a civilian to participate in spying
operations in this manner.
Israel's Mossad is exposing tens of thousands of Jews around the world
to considerable legal risk, and the sayanim, being sophisticated
business people, surely know this. If that is so, then why does this
system work? Why is the risk acceptable?
Here is Ostrovsky's answer from Page 87:
"One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it
is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you-but he won't turn
you in. You have at your disposal a non-risk recruitment system that
actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from
outside your own borders. It's much easier to operate with what is
available on the spot, and sayanim offer incredible practical support
everywhere".
Now one might suggest that, for example, Great Britain could use a
similar system and recruit among WASPS around the world. But they
don't, because they can't. It takes an extraordinary degree of racial
solidarity and racial motivation for such a "non-risk recruitment
system" to work properly. Remember, all of these activities are
spying, with long prison terms if caught. Americans of English, Irish
and Italian ancestry may have some residual loyalties to the old
"mother country". But this residue is nothing like the racial
solidarity of the Jews. Such racial feelings are so strong and so
pervasive among Jews that the Mossad knew in advance that their
recruitment system was "non-risk". Britain, Ireland, Italy and the
Vatican know better than to try.
While it may be true that Americans of English, Irish and Italian
ancestry have dual loyalties, these white gentile dual loyalties are
nothing like the degree of race-based loyalty possessed by the
overwhelming majority of Jews. You have it on the authority of Mossad!
Ostrovsky explains, beginning at the bottom of page 122:
"We took the Brits seriously, but everyone in the building used to say
they were probably deluded because of "the Bitch". That's what they
always called Margaret Thatcher inside the Mossad. They had her tagged
as an anti-Semite. There was one simple question asked when anything
happened: "Is it good for the Jews or not?" Forget about policies, or
anything else. That was the only thing that counted, and depending on
the answer, people were called anti-Semites, whether deservedly or
not".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is that Jews DO NOT have dual loyalties!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
90% of Jews have a single loyalty. The loyalty is not necessarily to
Israel, but to the welfare and power of Jews generally. That is the
only thing that matters.
The only question that ever gets asked is; "How will this affect
Jews?" No other interests are taken into account at all!
Indeed a corollary of "dual loyalty" is the goyish notion that if you
sacrifice to help others, they will reciprocate. If someone helps
Jews, there should be a reward.
European gentiles assume that comity and reciprocity are inherent in
the psychological makeup of all humanity. Not so, according to
Ostrovsky (page 231):
"The relationship between the Mossad and Danish intelligence is so
intimate as to be indecent. But it's not the Mossad's virtue that is
compromised by the arrangement; it's Denmark's. And that's because the
Danish are under the mistaken impression that because they saved a lot
of Jews in World War II, the Israelis are grateful and they can trust
the Mossad".
No matter what you do for Jews and no matter how assiduously you toady
to their interests, they will never respect yours.
That explains why destructive welfare state policies thrive despite 40
years of soaring black illegitimacy rates and the deepening
destruction of the black family and community in America. Does the
policy harm blacks! Of course! But that is irrelevant. Welfare
dependence has created a block that votes 90% for candidates friendly
to the welfare state and to Israel. Would blacks be better off as
tradesmen and entrepreneurs with stable families? Of course, but then
there would be no easy way to control their votes. The hopeless
dependency of most blacks increases the political power of Jews. That
is why the policy continues.
There is no comity, reciprocity or sense of obligation (dual loyalty)
that causes Jews to moderate their attack on America's blacks. Now you
might ask why Clinton, the "best friend Israel has ever had at the
White House", would sign welfare reform. The answer is the same. The
white illegitimacy rate has reached 25%. Millions of white girls in
suburban and rural areas are going on AFDC while their skin-head
boyfriends camp with them at night.
There is no way our masters are going to use the tax dollars at their
disposal to finance the creation of Dr. Pierce's 10 million man army
20 years from now!
It is one thing to fool 40% of Euro-Americans who have jobs and pay
taxes into believing they can get something out of the system. It is
quite another to subsidize the creation of a dangerous subculture with
real dollars. Jews just don't make those kinds of mistakes.
Ways can be found within the bureaucracy to continue welfare to
blacks. Hence Hillary Clinton's campaign to "fix" welfare reform.
A classic illustration of this phenomenon comes from a book entitled
"Special Tasks" (Little-Brown, 1994, 1995) written by Pavel Sudoplatov
and his son Anatoly.
Lieutenant General Pavel Sudoplatov was Joseph Stalin's NKVD director
in charge of stealing atomic secrets. He reported directly to Beria.
>From page 172:
"The most vital information for developing the first Soviet atomic
bomb came from scientists engaged in the Manhattan Project to build
the American Atomic Bomb - Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Leo
Szilard". Robert Oppenheimer was the director in charge of the
Manhattan project.
>From page 186-87:
"When it became clear that the atomic project was a heavily guarded,
top-secret American priority, Eitingon and I suggested that we use our
networks of illegals as couriers for our sources of information.
Vassili Zarubin, our Washington rezident, instructed Kheifetz to
divorce all intelligence operations from the American Communist party,
which we knew would be closely watched by the FBI, and to have
Oppenheimer sever all contacts with Communists and left-wingers".
On page 188:
"In 1943, a world-famous actor of the Moscow Yiddish State Art
Theatre, Solomon Mikhoels, together with well -known yiddish poet
Itzik Feffer, toured the United States on behalf of the Jewish Anti-
fascist Committee. Before their departure, Beria instructed Mikhoels
and Feffer to emphasize the great Jewish contribution to science and
culture in the Soviet Union. Their assignment was to raise money and
convince American public opinion that Soviet anti-semitism had been
crushed as a result of Stalin's policies. Kheifetz made sure that the
message they brought was conveyed to Oppenheimer. Kheifetz said that
Oppenheimer, the son of a German-Jewish immigrant, was deeply moved by
the information that a secure place for Jews in the Soviet Union was
guaranteed. They discussed Stalin's plans to set up a Jewish
autonomous republic in the Crimea after the war was won against
facism".
Beria understood the psychology of unitary loyalty perfectly!
Continuing on page 189:
"In developing Oppenheimer as a source, Vassili Zarubin's wife,
Elizabeth, was essential. She hardly appeared foreign in the United
States. Her manner was so natural and sociable that she immediately
made friends. Slim, with dark eyes, she had the classic Semitic beauty
that attracted both men and women, and she was one of the most
successful agent recruiters, establishing her own illegal network of
Jewish refugees from Poland, and recruiting one of Szilard's
secretaries, who provided technical data".
Oppenheimer's rationale was "fear that the Germans might produce the
first atomic bomb". But all he had to do to beat the Germans to the
punch was to build the bomb for America. And indeed, that would have
been the natural result of "dual loyalties". He could have helped Jews
and remained loyal to America at the same time.
But then helping America was not in the calculus at all. As Beria
understood perfectly, he was concerned only with one unitary question;
"How does this affect Jews?" And the answer was that just as
organizing the blacks and browns to vote their antagonistic racial
interests is critical to maintaining Jewish power over whites in
the 1990's, giving the atomic secrets to Russia was the one way to
reduce the power of whites in America in the 1940s and 50s.
Oppenheimer's naive view (prior to the creation of the Israeli State)
was that a nuclear armed Russia would provide one more possible haven
for Jews with the power to protect them.
The Goyim in our OSS (the forerunner of the CIA) would have assumed
"dual loyalty" and concluded that Oppenheimer presented no security
risk.
They were dead wrong, as Beria clearly understood.
So now the question becomes: - How many sayanim does it take to
"occupy America"?
Is Madeline Kerbel Albright (nominee for Secretary of State) a Sayan?
Is William Cohen (nominee for Secretary of Defense) a Sayan?
Is William Berger (nominee for National Security Agency chief) a
Sayan?
Is Anthony Lake (nominee to head CIA) a Sayan?
Is Robert Rubin (secretary of Treasury) a Sayan?
Is Alan Greenspan (chairman of the Federal Reserve) a Sayan?
Are these reasonable questions to ask?
In truth, of course, it is somewhat unlikely that these people, by far
the most powerful group in the United States, would agree to spend
their time schlepping TV sets for Mossad, or divulging secrets. They
can do far more to serve Jewish interests by guiding U.S. economic,
diplomatic and defense policies to serve Israel and Jewish interests
than they ever could through risky behaviors like divulging classified
data.
In fact, these people are in a far better position to put pressure on
Israel than Israel is to put pressure them.
Are the people named above capable of articulating U.S. interests (as
opposed to Jewish interests) on an intellectual level?
Of course! Quite skillfully, in fact!
Are they capable of acting upon those interests (our interests)?
That is a much tougher question. For a majority, it appears that the
answer is clearly "no" if Jewish insterests might also be involved.
The psychological and emotional ties within the group are so strong,
and they are so powerfully alienated from the white gentile majority
that their decisions and actions will never match their words. Just as
Oppenheimer's actions failed to square with his words.
Clinton's cabinet and the media moguls who control him are likely to
have their own strong views on the question "Is it good for Jews, or
not?" And they are not likely to take orders from Israel. Does that
mean there is no "conspiracy'?
Other than the publicly documented spying and extortion operations run
by the State of Israel, there probably isn't one. Rather, what we have
is an obsessive concern for the interests of Jews and a psychological
inability to represent the interests of others that is shared by such
an overwhelming majority of Jews, that their uncoordinated actions
appear pre-planned.
Colonel Ostrovsky notes in "By way of Deception" that Israel and its
supporters have a concept of the relation between media and government
that is powerfully at odds with our own Anglo-Saxon tradition that
inspired the First Amendment.
>From page 290:
"As usual in these affairs, the journalism fraternity in Israel knew
about the operation all along-or at least, they knew what the Mossad
and the prime minister's office wanted them to know - but they agreed
to withhold the story until they were given leave to print it. There
is a committee of editors, called the Vaudat Orchim,
of all the major media outlets in Israel that meets regularly with
government officials for background briefing on current events.
Israeli television is government controlled, as is all but one rogue
radio station, so that broadcasting is never a problem to control".
The Jewish - SDS flirtation with "free speech" at Berkeley in the
1960's was a temporary romance of convenience. Culturally, they are
more comfortable with a "Vaudat Orchim" and controlled news.
Is Laurence Tisch (CEO of CBS,) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Robert Sarnoff (RCA and NBC) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
How about Jeff Zuker (executive producer of NBC Nightly news)?
Is Jeff Sagansky (head of CBS entertainment division) a Sayan? A
member of a Vaudat Orchim?
Is Stuart Bloomberg (head of entertainment programming at ABC) a
Sayan? How about Vaudat Orchim?
Is Brandon Tartikoff (Paramount Pictures) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Gerald Levin (Time Warner Communications) a Sayan? Perhaps part of
a Vaudat Orchim?
Is Michael D. Eisner (Walt Disney Co.) a Sayan? Or a Vaudat Orchim
member?
Is Martin S. Davis (Paramount Communications) a Sayan? Or a Vaudat
Orchim, perhaps?
Is Peter Chernin (20th Century Fox Film Corp.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
How about Sandy Grushow (Fox Entertainment)? Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Peter Guber (Columbia Pictures Entertainment) a Sayan? Vaudat
Orchim?
Is Sumner Redstone [Murray Rothstein] (Viacom, MTV, Nickelodeon) a
Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Lew Wasserman (MCA Inc.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Ron Nessen (MBS radio news) a Sayan? - or a Vaudat Orchim?
How about Samuel and Donald Newhouse (31 newspapers, 12 broadcast
stations, 87 cable systems, Parade, New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,
Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House &
Garden, etc.)?
Sayanim?
Is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (New York Times, 33 additional papers, 7
radio and TV broadcasters a cable company and three book publishers) a
Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Katherine Meyer Graham (Washington Post, Newsweek) a Sayan? A
Vaudat Orchim?
Is Peter Kann (Dow Jones & Co, Wall Street journal) a Sayan? A Vaudat
Orchim?
How about Mortimer B. Zuckerman (New York Daily News, U.S. News &World
Report, Atlantic Monthly)? Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Do these people, and dozens more in similar positions meet to discuss
how to manage the news? Again, the truth is probably not. Why?
Simple. They already know what messages must be censored and what
events are newsworthy. They already know what to cover and what to
leave on the cutting room floor. Except on rarest occasions, they do
not need to be told what to do.
Each of these men will have his own passionately held convictions
about what kinds of news and entertainment for goyim will best serve
Jewish interests. These are not the type of men who would obediently
follow instructions from Isreal. But then the deep racial paranoia and
the intense loathing of Christianity that is taught to most Jews as
children at the dinner table ensures that many Jews will pursue
careers in media (such careers are "good for Jews") and will know what
to do when they get to the top of a network. They generally do not
need to be told!
And that, gentlemen, is the significance of "unitary racial loyalty"
that exists among 90% of this world's Jews.
Pat Buchanan once referred to Capitol Hill as "Israeli Occupied
Territory".
Can we justifiably say that we live in "Occupied America?"
No need to make up your minds yet. Might as well wait for parts two
and three of the "Occupied America" series.
Then you can be the judge!
http://home.ddc.net/ygg/rj/rj-26.htm
OCCUPIED AMERICA - Part II
--------------------------------
MISGEROT
---------------
In part one of this "Occupied America" series, we discussed the
network of Sayanim; - tens of thousands of Jews throughout the world
who assist Israel's Mossad in gathering intelligence.
We saw how most gentiles view this activity as a sign of "dual
loyalty", in that Jews will have a loyalty to their native countries
and to Israel, and that the loyalty to Israel is what prompts them to
serve as Sayanim.
However, if you think about it, "dual loyalties" would create
considerable risk for Mossad. It would be impossible for them to know
in advance the strength of the "non-Israel" loyalty, and whether it
might be strong enough to cause Jews they approach to turn agents in.
(All of this activity is a serious felony in virtually all countries
inwhich it takes place).
However, Victor Ostrovsky, author of "By Way of Deception" quite
candidly states that the existence of millions of Jews outside the
borders of Israel gives Mossad a "non-risk recruitment tool":
"One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it
is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you - but he won't turn
you in. You have at your disposal a non-risk recruitment system that
actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from
outside your own borders".
Now for this system to be "non-risk" these millions of Jews around the
world must have only a single loyalty - loyalty to Jews and their
interests. In the words of Ostrovsky:
"There was one simple question asked when anything happened: "Is it
good for the Jews or not?" Forget about policies, or anything else.
That was the only thing that counted... "
As an example of how this unitary or "single loyalty" works, we then
examined the case of Robert Oppenheimer, director of the Manhattan
Project, and father of the American atomic bomb, who passed atomic
secrets to Russia.
Finally, the prior post listed all of those eligible to be Sayanim in
cabinet level positions in our government, and at the very top of all
of our major mass media, thus setting forth a prima facie case that
America is, in fact, occupied by an alien power. The means, motive and
opportunity clearly exist, as does the corpus delicti of a decaying
and rudderless America.
In this installment, we are going to examine the heavily armed Jewish
groups established and run by retired Mossad officers throughout the
world, as a means of examining the question whether this is "Occupied
America".
>From "By Way of Deception" (St. Martins, 1990) Page 291:
"Arbel's department was responsible for setting up Jewish defense
groups, called "frames", or Misgerot, all over the world, now
including some parts of the United States, where anti-semitism is
regarded as a threat. Often people with particular skills, such as
doctors, are on reserve and called in for short periods to help with
these frames. Normally, heads of the stations for the frames in the
various countries are retired Mossad workers. The job is widely
regarded as a sort of bonus for faithful service, a tshupar, the idea
being that they've got all this expertise, why not use it?"
"The main job is to help the leaders of Jewish communities outside
Israel plan for their own security. Part of this is done through the
hets w-keshet, or "bow and arrow", Israel's paramilitary youth
brigades. While all Israeli youths, boys and girls, belong to this
"eduday noar ivry", or "battalion of Hebrew youth", often youths from
other countries are brought over to spend the summer learning about
security, picking up such skills as completing obstacle courses,
pitching tents, and learning how to use a sniper rifle and Uzi assault
rifle. Still others learn upgraded security skills, such as how to
build a slick, for hiding weapons or documents, when and how to do
security checks, as well as thefundamentals of investigation and
intelligence gathering.
"Any use of the frames other than for self-protection has never been
approved by any government official, although Mossad officials all
know of such use. Thus, Yitzhak Shamir knew, but Peres, never a Mossad
man, would not have known, even though he was prime minister. Israel
does not sell the weapons directly to these foreign frames, but it
does provide arms indirectly in a round-about arrangement with known
arms dealers.
"The Mossad does not see these frames as information gatherers,
although the station heads know from experience that the shortest
route to getting praise is by supplying useful information. Many of
the youths trained at the summer camps in Israel later become Sayanim,
and it certainly provides a strong group of willing helpers, well
trained, undaunted by the lingo, who have already shown the ability to
take chances...."
Page 140:
"We were now also learning about Tsafririm and the "frames" set up as
a defense mechanism by Jews around the world. In this area we had a
problem, or at least some of us did. I just couldn't agree with this
concept of having guard groups everywhere. I thought frames in
England, for example, where kids learn how to build slicks for their
weapons to protect their synagogues, were more dangerous than
beneficial to the Jewish community. I brought up the argument that
even if a group of people had been oppressed, with attempts made to
exterminate them - as with the Jews - they had no right to act
obstructively in democratic countries. I could understand this
happening in Chile or Argentina, or any other country where people
disappear off the streets, but not in England or France or Belgium.
"The fact that there are antisemitic groups, whether real or
imaginary, is definitely not an excuse, because if you look into
Israel's own backyard, you'll see anti-Palestinian groups. Did this
mean we thought the Palestinians therefore had the right to store
weapons and organize vigilante groups? Or would we call them
terrorists?"
Let's summarize:
-----------------------
* Israel maintains armed groups within our borders.
* These groups are run by agents of a foreign power. (retired Mossad
officers).
* Jewish youths from all over the world are flown to Israel to learn
how to use machine guns and sniper rifles.
* Once in Israel, these youths receive this training as part of the
"battalions of Hebrew youth", Israel's version of the Hitler Yungend.
* Israel smuggles full-automatic weapons to these groups through arms
dealers.
* Retired Mossad agents supervise this activity and keep them out of
trouble.
Three conditions must obtain before we can conclude that a country is
"occupied" by a foreign power. These three conditions or symptoms of
occupation must be clear.
* First, the occupier must hold commanding positions in the government
and in the media.
* Second, the occupied police forces follow the agenda of the
occupiers and ignore the illegal acts of occupation.
* Third, the occupier must control the electoral process and exact
tribute from the occupied.
Maintaining armed cells throughout the Western world under the
direction of foreign agents is profoundly illegal. Our FBI certainly
knows about these Misgerot or "frames" but they do nothing about
them.
No informants, no infiltrators, no arrests, no armed confrontations -
nothing!
Nothing, that is, except deafening silence.
It is obviously not an enforcement priority.
Only the spy Pollard was apprehended and then only because Pollard was
completely out of control. His copying of classified documents was so
prodigious as to become an embarrassment to his Israeli handlers.
His discovery, as well as the revelations of Ostrovsky, had absolutely
zero effect on our FBI. The only reasonable inferences to be drawn
from these facts are:
That the FBI already knew who it works for;
That only a small number of people who read books would find out about
these disclosures; and
That the people the FBI work for would remain in power, and that no
change in enforcement policy is necessary.
It is ironic. The Soviet Union used the Communist party to spy in
America back in the 1940's and 1950's. But they never dared flout U.S.
law by arming the communist cells they controlled. Israel's activity
is so absolutely and shockingly brazen that it leaves one breathless.
The lack of response from our own law enforcement agencies is stunning
silent testimony to the reason why Israel and its U.S. loyalists can
openly ignore our laws.
Indeed, it is similar in many ways to the scene at Florence and
Normandy during the Los Angeles riots. As Reginald Denny was having
his brains beat out, a dozen armed police in three cars slowly and
quietly backed away from the intersection. It was all captured on
camera.
The message was clear. You white citizens are on your own! Do not
expect us to protect you, even when we have the clear and overwhelming
power to do so.
Message understood, boys!
What we get instead is Feinstein in the Senate and Schumer in the
House ranting about how "uncomfortable" they feel living in a country
in which people have guns, and trying to convince the middle class to
be uncomfortable also. Their discomfort with people owning guns is
clearly selective. No mention of the Misgerot, with their full-
automatic (and clearly illegal) Uzi's. Jews owning guns is comforting
- gentiles owning guns is not!
Our FBI follows the Schumer - Feinstein agenda by assigning thousands
of agents to monitor anti-government types. They send out hundreds of
informants and provocateurs hoping to talk unsophisticated whites into
selling guns or exploding bombs on their own property.
Not surprisingly, they are occasionally successful.
They have enough success that the press is supplied with lurid stories
about militias and bombs so that middle class Euro-America will think
that the anti-government opposition is physically dangerous and
threatening to them.
It is a happy marriage of law-enforcement with news management. They
are new at this game, so occasionally they will make public relations
mistakes, as with the Waco assault and the killing of Vickie Weaver.
But supervisors are reprimanded and reassigned until more media savvy
types can be found to replace them.
The fact that our FBI has never busted a Sayan or a Misgerot gives you
a pretty clear idea of who they work for. It is a necessary pre-
condition of "occupied" status.
But apparently their masters are not happy with mere obedience and
loyal service. They demand degradation and humiliation as well.
Several years ago, our FBI was assigned the task of monitoring and
analyzing "hate crimes". In an article published by USA Today on
February 4, 1996, the FBI announced its statistics. There were 7947
hate crimes. 41% of the hate crimes were "intimidation". Another 23%
were vandalism or spray painting.
Intimidation?
Our FBI has been assigned the task of monitoring name-calling.
Shouting an epithet at someone from across the street has become a
"hate crime" in these United States of the Offended. And of course the
graffiti that graces much of our urban landscape in these United
States of the Offended has also become a "hate crime" if it contains
politically incorrect thoughts or lands on a synagogue.
Our FBI has been reduced to Kindergarten hall monitors ever on the
alert for politically incorrect insults.
There are 5 million assaults (unlawful beatings) committed each year
in the United States. Blacks commit 7.2 times more interracial
assaults than whites. When you correct for the fact that blacks
comprise 12% of the population, it is 50 times more likely that a
black will assault a white than it is for a white to assault a black.
So apparently, assigning the FBI the job of monitoring and gathering
statistics on name calling and politically incorrect midnight artistry
provides the media with the basic feedstock required to convince the
soccer moms that it is the poor whites with anti-government views who
are the dangerous criminals.
At the same time, of course, the Bureau of Justice Statistics has
decided to stop gathering data on the race of crime perpetrators and
victims. Too much grist for the internet!
An occupying power will seek to degrade those who obey its command.
Like mandatory "sensitivity training", making the FBI cross dress as
Ms. Manners is an important psychological tool and an important emblem
of power. It is a way of letting every agent know unmistakably who is
in charge.
And so, perhaps, the FBI must accept its Ms. Manners - hall monitor
role at the same time it serves up press conferences about
statistically rare violations by rural militias. Never a nod to
policing Israel's spying Sayanim or busting its illegally armed
Misgerot.
And of course, stopping the vast wave of real crime that engulfs our
cities and makes them unsafe for the Soccer Moms to enter at night
simply is not part of the agenda at all.
No matter how humbly the boys in the FBI shuffle, it will never be
enough.
Having fun in Occupied America?