Bukakke declares support for Dawkin's claim - "the Existence of God is highly plausible"

[fasgnadh]

On 7/02/2013 11:51 AM, Budikka666 wrote:

Bukakke is out prosletysing for Dawkin's new atheist religion:

> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=4
>
> Dawkins actually said: "It’s highly plausible that in the
> universe there are God-like creatures."

That's what theists have been telling atheists for centuries!! B^D

Now the atheists concede the point!

Priceless! B^D


> Note the 'god-like'.

immaterial, SUPERNATURAL deities described in the article thus:

"superpowerful intelligent and moral energy"

Er, any physicist like to comment on Bukkake's BELIEF
in bodiless INTELLIGENT and MORAL ENERGY!!! 8^o

No physical body.. sounds like a SPIRIT or a SOUL

And so when asked "like God?"

Dawkins replies yes, and calls it's existence 'highly plausible'

Game, set and match to the theists!

> Dawkins did *not* say that there is a god.

Bukakke has a severe learning difficulty:

“It’s very important to understand that these Gods CAME INTO BEING by an
explicable scientific progression .....”
- Dawkins op cit B^]

Bukakke posts the citation to Dawkins and then tries to DENY what he
actually said!!!!

But then, he has a history of lying..

> He did *not* say it's highly plausible that there is a god.

“It’s very important to understand that these Gods came into being.."
- Bishop Dawkins, delivering a sermon at the first Atheist church;

http://firstchurchofatheism.com/

...where Bukakke sings castrato in the choir;

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,
alt.religion,alt.religion.christian
# Subject: Disapproving Creation:
# Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<b5430732-e52e-45b5...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
#
#
#> come worshiping at the altar of atheism,

No thanks, I'm an agnostic, I don't believe in Dawkin's atheist Gods
for which none of you have any PROOF!!!

> What he's saying, to anyone with an ounce of common sense
> is

“ these Gods came into being" - Bishop Dawkins, First atheist church

Bukakke has a long history of lying in public and running away when
he's challenged to provide PROOF for his claim that atheist infanticide
was defensible! (or to explain why he cross-dresses and adopts a female
persona online;-) B^D

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/8e03d6bb01bb35c5?hl=en&dmode=source


Bukakke ran, unable to provide ANY proof for his despicable defence
of atheist infanticide;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0kPQiQufpE

Since that day Bukakke has been stuffed and mounted over
my mantlepiece as a trophy:

http://www.humanisthall.net/Trophy3.jpg

> a dinosaur.
>
> Budikka




--


"At the dawn of the 20th Century approximately one half of the world's
population identified itself as either Muslim, Catholic, Protestant,
Hindu or Buddhist, and 100 years of secularism, and technological
advancement, and scientific progress later and that number is now
two thirds.

So, for those of you who enjoy beginning coffee shop
conversations with "The Death of God" .. it's time to change
the subject! It's time to talk about something else , because
it's not happening at all.

People are becoming more religious, not less religious,
and religion itself is also evolving"



- Dr Reza Aslan

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/bigideas/stories/2010/2929354.htm


---------

alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source



"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

“Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)



http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[Andrew W]

"fasgnadh" <fasg...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:csiRs.3386$1k5....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com

> On 7/02/2013 11:51 AM, Budikka666 wrote:
>
> Bukakke is out prosletysing for Dawkin's new atheist religion:
>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=4
>>
>> Dawkins actually said: "It's highly plausible that in the
>> universe there are God-like creatures."
>
> That's what theists have been telling atheists for centuries!! B^D
>
> Now the atheists concede the point!
>

The point that there are god like creatures - i.e. extraterrestrials?

>
> Priceless! B^D
>
>
>> Note the 'god-like'.
>
> immaterial, SUPERNATURAL deities described in the article thus:
>
> "superpowerful intelligent and moral energy"
>

Not all ETs are moral.

>
> Er, any physicist like to comment on Bukkake's BELIEF
> in bodiless INTELLIGENT and MORAL ENERGY!!! 8^o
>
> No physical body.. sounds like a SPIRIT or a SOUL
>
> And so when asked "like God?"
>
> Dawkins replies yes, and calls it's existence 'highly plausible'
>
> Game, set and match to the theists!
>

You theists will try to claim victory for anything.

>
>> Dawkins did *not* say that there is a god.
>
> Bukakke has a severe learning difficulty:
>
> "It's very important to understand that these Gods CAME INTO BEING by
> an explicable scientific progression ....."
> - Dawkins op cit B^]
>

Its referring to possible extraterrestrials, not a single God.
You have the learning difficulties.

--
Religions breed hypocrisy and self-righteousness.

Many Christians spend more time looking down on other people than up
towards Christ.

[fasgnadh]

On 9/02/2013 4:04 PM, Andrew W wrote:
> "fasgnadh" <fasg...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:csiRs.3386$1k5....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com
>> On 7/02/2013 11:51 AM, Budikka666 wrote:
>>
>> Bukakke is out prosletysing for Dawkin's new atheist religion:
>>
>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=4
>>>
>>> Dawkins actually said: "It's highly plausible that in the
>>> universe there are God-like creatures."
>>
>> That's what theists have been telling atheists for centuries!! B^D
>>
>> Now the atheists concede the point!
>>
>
> The point that there are god like creatures

God-like was defined in the article, he was responding to
the question "Like God?" in relation to Dyson's SUPERNATURAL
"superpowerful intelligent and moral energy"!

Now to be Like God they would need to be omnipotent, omniscient,
eternal..

> - i.e. extraterrestrials?

Humans are extraterrestials, having been into space and to the moon.

Clearly they are NOT God-like, they just seem that way in the
imaginations of some people.

>> Priceless! B^D
>>
>>
>>> Note the 'god-like'.
>>
>> immaterial, SUPERNATURAL deities described in the article thus:
>>
>> "superpowerful intelligent and moral energy"
>>
>
> Not all ETs are moral.

So you already knew they don't qualify.

Please try and demonstrate a modicum of intelligence,
otherwise you just make the atheist denial of Dawkin's concession
look weak and stupid, which is what it is!

B^D

>>
>> Er, any physicist like to comment on Bukkake's BELIEF
>> in bodiless INTELLIGENT and MORAL ENERGY!!! 8^o
>>
>> No physical body.. sounds like a SPIRIT or a SOUL
>>
>> And so when asked "like God?"
>>
>> Dawkins replies yes, and calls it's existence 'highly plausible'
>>
>> Game, set and match to the theists!
>>
>
> You theists will try to claim victory for anything.

I'm an agnostic.

Your ad hom attacks merely demonstrate the incapacity of
atheists to respond rationally and with intellectual honesty
to Dawkin's assertion that "these Gods came into being",
thus conceeding the theist position.

>>> Dawkins did *not* say that there is a god.
>>
>> Bukakke has a severe learning difficulty:
>>
>> "It's very important to understand that these Gods CAME INTO BEING by
>> an explicable scientific progression ....."
>> - Dawkins op cit B^]
>>
>
> Its referring to possible extraterrestrials,

The statement is categorical, not a speculation on possibility.
"Came into being" is past tense, that rules out possibility
and is discussing ACTUALITY. Are you as ignorant of the clear and plain
meaning of language as you are of what the charactersistics of God are?
Perhaps that is the problem with atheists, they are lacking in
understanding and have a cookie cutter, infantile, straw man conception
of what it is that theists believe in!

You are being stupid, extraterrestials are not God-like "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" In fact the entire concept is ludicrous,
and merely demonstrates that atheists have a feeble minded, irrational
and ignorant conception of what the God theists believe in, is.


> not a single God.

Stop trying to put words in Dawkin's mouth just because WHAT he ACTUALLY
said does not suit you.

Discussing the PROPERTIES of Dysons imaginary characters, he was asked
if bolts of "superpowerful intelligent and moral energy" sounded "LIKE
GOD" and he replied CERTAINLY.

Now all you terrified atheists are scurrying about trying to pretend
he's a senile imbecile who can't form a clear rational thought, and is
incapable of clear speech.

If the description was not Like God, and Dawkins had not admitted that
the EXISTENCE of God like beings was more than possible.. PLAUSIBLE
and that in fact "these Gods CAME INTO BEING" you might have something
to say worth listening to.

But as that is clearly NOT the case you just look desperate and foolish.

Carry on, atheists have been doing that for millennia, and are
apparently incapable of learning from their ongoing failure! B^p

http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Head-Up_Ass.png

> You have the learning difficulties.
>


--

"At the dawn of the 20th Century approximately one half of the world's
population identified itself as either Muslim, Catholic, Protestant,
Hindu or Buddhist, and 100 years of secularism, and technological
advancement, and scientific progress later and that number is now
two thirds.

So, for those of you who enjoy beginning coffee shop
conversations with "The Death of God" .. it's time to change
the subject! It's time to talk about something else , because
it's not happening at all.

People are becoming more religious, not less religious,
and religion itself is also evolving"



- Dr Reza Aslan

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/bigideas/stories/2010/2929354.htm


---------

alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source



"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

�Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!�

[Andrew]

"Budikka666" wrote in message news:kf92c0$971$3...@dont-email.me...
> On Feb 8, 8:25 pm, fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Budikka declares support for Dawkins' claim: the Existence of God is
> highly plausible"
> [your jerk-wad juvenile excuse for grammar has been corrected. The
> biologist's name is Dawkins, you abysmally ignorant piece of gutter
> trash, and the possessive of that is Dawkins's. Got that now?}
>
> I did not declare support for any claim that "the Existence of God is
> highly plausible". And that is *not* the claim that Dawkins made, as I
> pointed out to that ignorant spamming coward BrailJOB in my response of
> February 6th. But keep up the good work. You Usenet religious jerks do
> far more harm to your own cause with your ignorance and lies then ever we
> atheists do with the truth! lol!
>
> However, if you can find the guts and wherewithal to take me on in a
> formal debate on the existence of your bullshit god, I will lower myself
> once more and make some time for you.
>
> Open it right here in this thread by posting your five best *objective*
> *independent* items of *positive* evidence for this god of yours, and
> let's all see what you've got. My prediction is that you'll run from
> this challenge as you've always done from my challenges.
>
> So go on, Flatnads, put up or keep on running.
>
> Next creationist right this way, please!

> I'm here all week.

While waiting, perhaps you would like
to take this opportunity to meditate on
the coming appointment that you have
with your Maker, which may occur a lot
sooner than you think. Whereupon you
will be required to answer for what you
have done with the life and the body that
He has given to you, at this time here.

"know thou, that for all these things,
God will bring thee into judgment."
~ Eccl 11:9 ~

The wise thing to do is to make peace
with Him beforehand and to accept the
wonderful plan of redemption that He
has so graciously offered to us sinners.


> Budikka



Andrew

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <O6-dnaFoR7TI1IXM...@earthlink.com>,

Why should we believe you?

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Andrew W]

"fasgnadh" <fasg...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:TgSRs.3565$Ow3....@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com

> On 9/02/2013 4:04 PM, Andrew W wrote:
>> "fasgnadh" <fasg...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:csiRs.3386$1k5....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com
>>> On 7/02/2013 11:51 AM, Budikka666 wrote:
>>>
>>> Bukakke is out prosletysing for Dawkin's new atheist religion:
>>>
>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=4
>>>>
>>>> Dawkins actually said: "It's highly plausible that in the
>>>> universe there are God-like creatures."
>>>
>>> That's what theists have been telling atheists for centuries!! B^D
>>>

Wrong. Theists have been declaring that there's a single almighty God
creator.

>
>>> Now the atheists concede the point!
>>>

Nope.

>>
>> The point that there are god like creatures
>
> God-like was defined in the article, he was responding to
> the question "Like God?" in relation to Dyson's SUPERNATURAL
> "superpowerful intelligent and moral energy"!
>
> Now to be Like God they would need to be omnipotent, omniscient,
> eternal..
>

Nope. God-like simply means very powerful and sophisticated compared to the
less powerful observer.

>
>> - i.e. extraterrestrials?
>
> Humans are extraterrestials, having been into space and to the moon.
>

Humans are just barely ETs.
We were only on the moon very briefly.
We haven't yet left our solar system and walked on another planet.

>
> Clearly they are NOT God-like, they just seem that way in the
> imaginations of some people.
>

Most ETs are indeed God-like to humans.
And the non-physical ones are eternal etc.

>
>>> Priceless! B^D
>>>
>>>
>>>> Note the 'god-like'.
>>>
>>> immaterial, SUPERNATURAL deities described in the article thus:
>>>
>>> "superpowerful intelligent and moral energy"
>>>
>>
>> Not all ETs are moral.
>
>
> So you already knew they don't qualify.
>

Don't qualify for what?
God-like means very powerful.

>
> Please try and demonstrate a modicum of intelligence,
> otherwise you just make the atheist denial of Dawkin's concession
> look weak and stupid, which is what it is!
>
> B^D
>
>>>
>>> Er, any physicist like to comment on Bukkake's BELIEF
>>> in bodiless INTELLIGENT and MORAL ENERGY!!! 8^o
>>>
>>> No physical body.. sounds like a SPIRIT or a SOUL
>>>
>>> And so when asked "like God?"
>>>
>>> Dawkins replies yes, and calls it's existence 'highly plausible'
>>>
>>> Game, set and match to the theists!
>>>
>>
>> You theists will try to claim victory for anything.
>
>
> I'm an agnostic.
>

Going by your posts I'm not too convinced.
You spruik for theists as far as I can see.

>
> Your ad hom attacks merely demonstrate the incapacity of
> atheists to respond rationally and with intellectual honesty
>

My ad hominem attacks? What about yours?
They're much worse.

>
> to Dawkin's assertion that "these Gods came into being",
> thus conceeding the theist position.
>>
>>>> Dawkins did *not* say that there is a god.
>>>
>>> Bukakke has a severe learning difficulty:
>>>
>>> "It's very important to understand that these Gods CAME INTO BEING
>>> by an explicable scientific progression ....."
>>> - Dawkins op cit B^]
>>>
>>
>> Its referring to possible extraterrestrials,
>
> The statement is categorical, not a speculation on possibility.
> "Came into being" is past tense, that rules out possibility
> and is discussing ACTUALITY. Are you as ignorant of the clear and
> plain meaning of language as you are of what the charactersistics of
> God are? Perhaps that is the problem with atheists, they are lacking
> in understanding and have a cookie cutter, infantile, straw man
> conception of what it is that theists believe in!
>

Another scathing ad hominem - duly ignored.

And I am not an atheist. I'm an ET and metaphysics researcher.

>
> You are being stupid, extraterrestials are not God-like "superpowerful
> intelligent and moral energy"

To us humans, ETs are very God-like.
They have enough advanced technologies, capabilities and knowledge of the
universe to make us look like grazing cattle.

>
In fact the entire concept is
> ludicrous, and merely demonstrates that atheists have a feeble
> minded, irrational and ignorant conception of what the God theists
> believe in, is.

Another ad hominem ignored.

It seems to me that you're completely clueless about both what a 'God' is
and what ETs are.
You just like making a lot of smoke and noise I think.

>
>> not a single God.
>
> Stop trying to put words in Dawkin's mouth just because WHAT he
> ACTUALLY said does not suit you.
>

Nor do his words suit you either apparently.
His words are quite open to interpretation.

>
> Discussing the PROPERTIES of Dysons imaginary characters, he was asked
> if bolts of "superpowerful intelligent and moral energy" sounded "LIKE
> GOD" and he replied CERTAINLY.
>
> Now all you terrified atheists are scurrying about trying to pretend
> he's a senile imbecile who can't form a clear rational thought, and is
> incapable of clear speech.
>
> If the description was not Like God, and Dawkins had not admitted that
> the EXISTENCE of God like beings was more than possible.. PLAUSIBLE
> and that in fact "these Gods CAME INTO BEING" you might have something
> to say worth listening to.
>

So what was your point exactly? Do you have one?

If you're just an agnostic then you categorically don't know either way, so
start acting like one instead of mouthing off.

>
> But as that is clearly NOT the case you just look desperate and
> foolish.
> Carry on, atheists have been doing that for millennia, and are
> apparently incapable of learning from their ongoing failure! B^p
>
> http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Head-Up_Ass.png
>
>
>> You have the learning difficulties.
>>

I don't.

Have you as an agnostic ever achieved anything in the area of metaphysical
or even philosophical knowledge?
If not then pipe down.

Loud atheists only exist in response to the loud preaching dumb theists who
can't keep their beliefs in the privacy of their own homes.

Quiet atheists on the other hand simply mind their own business and don't
believe in deities. Nothing wrong with that.

[Budikka666]

All Flee & Hide All-Seeing-| Ran:
http://tinyurl.com/3zmbfku
http://tinyurl.com/6w3mbrr
http://tinyurl.com/cp8de7y
http://tinyurl.com/77tkgdk

All-Seeing-| denies Christ Thrice:
http://tinyurl.com/836mqf8
http://tinyurl.com/6lj584p
http://tinyurl.com/7pz5ljp

BrailJOB the LiarBoi Loonbag DENYING Jesus THRICE, shrinking away like
a limp Peter at the passion:
http://tinyurl.com/6kck7b5
http://tinyurl.com/7d2s93z
http://tinyurl.com/6wyp6se

The above are included in the following examples of BrailJOB running
in
every single case when he was given ONE HUNDRED Opportunities to
witness for his LORD:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.creationism/msg/c69a90d07c0a4d79

Here is BrailJOB the Liarboi running from me for one hundred
consecutive days in his *own* debate challenge thread:
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e8b50cdfc13197e8?hl=en&scoring=d&

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank's most recent denials of his creator
god right below:

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank admits he has no faith in his own
god:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/4970c8ea65babc59?scoring=d&

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank admits that even he doesn't believe:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/4970c8ea65babc59?scoring=d&

More excuses from Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/cbe97ddc53be5a00?scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/59b246e0c8e3e4f9?scoring=d&

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank Ran from challenges in SIX THREADS
simultaneously:
http://tinyurl.com/8cpp6ru
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e8da88e0f6b5a76b?hl=en&scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate the
authenticity of the "Shroud of Turin", Creationist Coward-For-Christ™
Andrew-a-Blank openly admitted that he could not support his LIES by
turning tail and running like the rank coward that he is, thereby
proving that he has ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god.
If there were an omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had*
any faith, he would have trusted that god to support him and he would
have taken me up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/9rm86aj
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/245ef4c4f9f8933b?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate the
existence of Jesus Christ, miracle-working son of a god, Creationist
Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank openly admitted that he could not
support his LIES by turning
tail and running like the rank coward that he is, thereby proving that
he has ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god. If there were
an omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had* any faith, he
would have trusted that god to support him and he would have taken me
up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/8o3wsmg
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/ec1a84272b3493f1?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate the
Noahic flood, Creationist Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank openly
admitted that he could not support his LIES by turning tail and
running like the rank coward that he is, thereby proving that he has
ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god. If there were an
omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had* any faith, he
would have trusted that god to support him and he would have taken me
up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/9hpgy2v
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/db798efe8d1d0c97?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and present scientific
evidence in support of many wild claims he had made, Creationist
Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank openly admitted that he could not
support his LIES by turning tail and running like the rank coward that
he is, thereby proving that he has ZERO FAITH in his worthless and
fictitious god. If there were an omnipotent creator god, and this
loser actually *had* any faith, he would have trusted that god to
support him and he would have taken me up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/986crjk
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/fb6771658c489b66?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate ENCODE's
latest data, Creationist Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank openly
admitted that he could not support his LIES by turning tail and
running like the rank coward that he is, thereby proving that he has
ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god. If there were an
omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had* any faith, he
would have trusted that god to support him and he would have taken me
up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/ckeaadm
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/c786b453f00abb9a?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate his 8
unsupported claims about information, Creationist Coward-For-Christ™
Andrew-a-Blank openly admitted that he could not support his LIES by
turning tail and running like the rank coward that he is, thereby
proving that he has ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god.
If there were an omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had*
any faith, he would have trusted that god to support him and he would
have taken me up on my debate offer.
So now you know the truth about Andrew-a-Blank - even *he* does not
truly believe in this god he espouses!
End of story.

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank Ran from a simple question in
*another* SIX THREADS simultaneously:
http://tinyurl.com/7zghp7o
http://tinyurl.com/76a8chm
http://tinyurl.com/6q3q498
http://tinyurl.com/6n2swsr
http://tinyurl.com/7rvtlyu
http://tinyurl.com/7x4m3fv

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank Ran from a debate on DNA in *yet
another* TEN THREADS simultaneously:
http://tinyurl.com/7zcuwsb
http://tinyurl.com/7t47anq
http://tinyurl.com/7wvegqc
http://tinyurl.com/6rg67wc
http://tinyurl.com/8yqo8fw
http://tinyurl.com/77bopo8
http://tinyurl.com/86zwhj6
http://tinyurl.com/7zlzxtd
http://tinyurl.com/7eknx73
http://tinyurl.com/6lgcwpq

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank denies Christ thrice:
http://tinyurl.com/7x9c5wn
http://tinyurl.com/74h455e
http://tinyurl.com/7kl4hc7

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank ran from debate:
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/7dd8ed410470f4c2?hl=en
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e8da88e0f6b5a76b?hl=en&scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/245ef4c4f9f8933b?scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e9b89ac33e01ce5b?scoring=d&
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/836bea1f79468d9b?hl=en&scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/728ceae4eb1d55e3?scoring=d&
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/3a31410d460b908e?hl=en&scoring=d&

BilliBoi Chicken Bill Ran:
http://tinyurl.com/3pabgsu

Coward-For-Christ™ Calvin Ramsey Denying Christ Thrice:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e789f4adad4e8fad?scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/5ddc9354493b62b3?scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/5cfb83a18dbc7442?scoring=d&

Coward-For-Christ™ Calvin Ramsey Ran Away:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/ebdeac2fb584efac?scoring=d&

Coward-For-Christ™ Codebreaker Ran:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/5868cad2d0302527/f756e4d43ab0ae9f?q=Where+is+the+Soul%3F+group:alt.atheism+author:Budikka#f756e4d43ab0ae9f

Duck & Run Duke Ran:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/0cb3889ae3bd41dd

Duck & Run Duke Denies Christ Thrice:
http://tinyurl.com/867lax4
http://tinyurl.com/7kawokn
http://tinyurl.com/3brposl

Flatnads Fasghnad RAN:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/58c9df7a83bdd7e3?scoring=d&

IlNeverBeBauck IlBeBauck Ran:
http://tinyurl.com/3efeute
http://tinyurl.com/7ppk3mq
http://tinyurl.com/7trpdte
http://tinyurl.com/82fte2a
http://tinyurl.com/6n5pj4u

IlNeverBebauck denies Christ thrice:
http://tinyurl.com/7kl4hc7
http://tinyurl.com/7od78wt
http://tinyurl.com/7abfajg

Joe Bruno Ran away:
http://tinyurl.com/8m38v5w

Jope ran away:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/f73b5397e9553a65?scoring=d&
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/787f72a77ea8f2c2?hl=en&scoring=d&

Patrick denies Christ thrice:
http://tinyurl.com/7l5hyw5

US4Lyin' US4ZION Ran
http://tinyurl.com/79f9oxx

US4ZION Denies Christ Thrice:
http://tinyurl.com/7oqwbqq
http://tinyurl.com/7rpq6ch
http://tinyurl.com/7pj5ut5

Old Man Joke Old Man Joe ran:
http://tinyurl.com/887lhzh

Zacharias Mulletstein Denies Christ Thrice:
http://tinyurl.com/7a47jy8

Zacharias Mulletstein ran away:
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e8b50cdfc13197e8?hl=en&scoring=d&

Budikka