Islamic Terror attacks for past 2 months
repo
List of Islamic Terror Attacks For the Past 2 Months
Date Country City Killed Injured Description
8/23/2008 Pakistan Abuha 2 4 Two people are killed when Islamists
detonate a bomb at an intersection.
8/23/2008 Pakstan Swat 15 23 A Holy Warrior sends over a dozen
innocents to Allah with a car bomb.
8/22/2008 Pakistan NWFP 2 14 Two security force personnel are killed
when Mujahideen attack their vehicle with a grenade.
8/22/2008 India Ganderbal 1 1 A local soldier is shot to death by
Islamic militants while standing guard.
8/22/2008 Pakistan Peshawar 1 2 Taliban militants fire rockets into a
police station, killing one officer.
8/21/2008 Pakistan Kohat 1 0 Muslim radicals on motorcycles gun down a
young soldier.
8/21/2008 Pakistan Swat 5 1 Five civilians are brutally gunned down in
two Taliban drive-bys.
8/21/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 6 11 Six civilians are killed during two
separate attacks by Islamic militia.
8/21/2008 Iraq Mosul 1 0 A civilian is abducted and beheaded by
suspected fundamentalists.
8/21/2008 Pakistan Wah 78 67 Over seventy innocents are slaughtered by
twin Fedayeen suicide bombers outside a factory.
8/21/2008 Thailand Narathiwat 2 17 A journalist is among two people
murdered by Muslim car bombers.
8/20/2008 Algeria Bouira 12 38 Islamic fundamentalists murder a dozen
civilians with two bomb attacks, one on a hotel.
8/20/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 4 7 Four civilians are killed during an
ambush by Islamic hardliners.
8/20/2008 Iraq Baghdad 7 6 Seven civilians are murdered by Islamic
terrorists in various attacks, including a woman and a player on a
soccer field.
8/20/2008 Somalia Kismayo 9 22 Al Shabaab Islamists attack a town,
killing at least nine civilians.
8/20/2008 Pakistan Peshawar 2 0 Jaish-i-Islami shoot two accused
prostitutes to death, then mutilate their faces with knives.
8/19/2008 Afghanistan Surobi 10 21 Ten French soldiers are brutally
ambushed and killed. Four were murdered in captivity.
8/19/2008 Iraq Baqubah 35 0 Thirty-five victims of Sunni terrorists
are found bound and executed in two mass graves.
8/19/2008 Algeria Issers 43 38 An Islamic fundamentalist drives a car
packed with explosives into a police school. Over forty are killed in
the carnage.
8/19/2008 Pakistan Dera Ismail Khan 30 32 A man walks into a hospital,
yells "Allah Akbar," then detonates, slaughtering over thirty
innocents.
8/19/2008 Afghanistan Khost 2 0 Two civilians are killed in attacks by
Sunni suicide bombers.
8/18/2008 Philippines Mindanao 49 50 Forty-nine Christian villagers
are shot or hacked to death by Moro Islamists rampaging through three
towns.
8/18/2008 Afghanistan Khost 10 13 Ten civilians are murdered by a
suicide bomber along a city street. The victims are described as "poor
laborers."
8/18/2008 Somalia Doblai 2 2 Fundamentalists hurl a grenade into a
meeting place used by a sect, killing two people.
8/18/2008 Pakistan Swat 1 0 A civilian is shot to death by
Mujahideen.
8/18/2008 Iraq Baghdad 1 1 Radicals gun down a cleric. His wife is
also shot in the attack.
8/18/2008 Iraq Ramadi 5 7 Five Iraqis are taken down by a Fedayeen car
bomber.
8/17/2008 Azerbaijan Baku 2 8 Islamic extremists are thought
responsible for hurling a grenade into a mosque.
8/17/2008 Afghanistan Helmand 3 4 A woman and two small children are
killed when Mujahideen use them as human shields.
8/17/2008 Iraq Baghdad 15 29 An al-Qaeda suicide bomber on a
motorcycle attacks a crowd outside a Sunni mosque, killing at least
fifteen innocents.
8/17/2008 Somalia Dinsoor 2 0 Two humanitarian workers are murdered by
hardline Islamists.
8/17/2008 Philippines Lanao del Sur 7 11 Moro Islamists ambush a
logistics transport, killing seven riders.
8/16/2008 Pakistan Hayatabad 1 0 A prominent Shia leader is shot to
death outside his home by Sunni militants.
8/16/2008 Philippines Panamao 2 0 Two off-duty soldiers are brutally
murdered by Abu Sayyaf after being stranded by a broken motorcycle.
8/16/2008 Iraq Baghdad 6 11 Six more Shia pilgrims are murdered by
Sunni bombers in an attack on their minibus.
8/16/2008 India Kishtwar 1 0 Mujahideen abduct and murder a civilian.
8/16/2008 Afghanistan Logar 1 0 A drum player is shot to death by
Islamic hardliners.
8/16/2008 Pakistan Shawaal 1 0 A 40-year-old man is beheaded by
religious radicals.
8/16/2008 Afghanistan Kandahar 10 0 Ten Afghans are blown up by
religious extremists in a roadside attack.
8/15/2008 Iraq Balad 9 48 Sunnis detonate a bomb on a bus carrying
Shiite pilgrims, killing nine.
8/15/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 5 0 Islamic militia kill five people with
a roadside bomb along a city street.
8/14/2008 Iraq Baqubah 1 2 An 8-year-old girl is killed by Islamic
bomber, who also wound her mother and sister.
8/14/2008 Pakistan Swat 1 0 A civilian is abducted and riddled with
bullets by Sunni militants.
8/14/2008 Pakistan Umari 1 0 A pro-government tribesman is shot to
death by the Taliban
8/14/2008 Pakistan Swat 2 0 A woman and a boy are killed when
Islamists fire on security forces in a populated area.
8/14/2008 Iraq Karbala 18 75 An al-Qaeda female suicide bomber strikes
a group of Shiite pilgrims, slaughtering at least eighteen.
8/14/2008 Algeria Jijel 2 0 An army officer and his driver are killed
by Islamic fundamentalists in their car. A separate bombing kills one
other person.
8/13/2008 Afghanistan Logar 4 0 Three female humanitarian workers and
their driver are brutally shot to death at point blank range by Holy
Warriors.
8/13/2008 Afghanistan Helmand 5 4 Taliban bombers murder five local
police.
8/13/2008 Thailand Pattani 1 19 Islamists gun down a 26-year-old man,
then plant a bomb to catch first responders.
8/13/2008 Thailand Yala 1 2 A 57-year-old man is killed, and his
family injured, when Mujahideen toss a grenade into his home.
8/13/2008 Lebanon Tripoli 18 45 Eighteen people at a bus stop are
blown to bits by Islamic bombers.
8/13/2008 Iraq Mosul 3 15 Islamic bombers kill three Iraqis at an
intersection.
8/13/2008 Iraq Qayara 2 10 Two patrons are killed when Jihadis set off
a car bomb at a market.
8/13/2008 Pakistan Lahore 9 35 Islamists bomb an independence day
celebration, killing at least nine innocents.
8/13/2008 Pakistan Kirri 1 5 Baitullah Mehsud terrorists ambush a
group of local soldiers, killing one.
8/13/2008 Pakistan Bajaur 1 0 A doctor is killed while being held as a
human shield by Mujahideen.
8/13/2008 India Kishtwar 1 0 A civilian is shot to death by Muslim
militants outside his home.
8/13/2008 Algeria Bouira 1 0 A local guard is killed by a bomb planted
by Islamic fundamentalists.
8/13/2008 Iraq Khan Bani Saad 1 2 A local woman is taken out by
Mujahideen bombers.
8/12/2008 Iraq Ramadi 6 0 A woman and three children are among six
family members shot to death by the Religion of Peace.
8/12/2008 Thailand Narathiwat 3 1 Two small children and their father
are brutally gunned down by radical Muslims while out on a family
trip.
8/12/2008 China Xinjiang 3 0 Three security guards are stabbed to
death by Muslim militants.
8/12/2008 Iraq Baqubah 2 10 A female suicide bomber takes out two
Iraqis.
8/12/2008 Germany Ruesselsheim 1 0 A 55-year-old woman is shot to
death in an honor attack involving two Muslim groups.
8/12/2008 Pakistan Peshawar 13 11 A child is among thirteen people
killed when Sunni bombers target a minibus.
8/12/2008 Philippines Basilan 4 0 At least four Catholic civilians are
killed when Moro Islamists strafe their homes with gunfire.
8/11/2008 Afghanistan Kabul 3 12 Three Afghan civilians are blown
apart by a suicide car bomber.
8/11/2008 Iraq Baqubah 4 16 A female suicide bomber takes out four
Iraqis.
8/11/2008 Iraq Wajihiya 5 3 Five women field laborers are slain by
Jihad bombers while walking to work.
8/11/2008 Afghanistan Uruzgan 6 3 A child is among a half dozen
civilians killed while being used as human shields by Holy Warriors.
8/11/2008 Philippines Basilan 2 12 Two civilians are killed when Moro
Islamists storm a village.
8/11/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 8 0 Holy Warriors kill eight soldiers in a
brutal ambush.
8/11/2008 Iran Saravan 2 0 A Sunni group called 'soldiers of Allah'
kidnaps and executes two security guards.
8/11/2008 Pakistan Bajaur 2 0 Islamists capture and then cut the heads
off of two civilians.
8/10/2008 Afghanistan Kandahar 5 3 A group of migrant laborers is
blown up by Taliban bombers. Five are killed.
8/10/2008 Iraq Tarmiyah 4 21 Four locals are taken out in a suicide
bombing.
8/10/2008 Iraq Khanaqin 3 25 Fedayeen bombers blow themselves up in a
minibus along a city street, killing three innocent bystanders.
8/10/2008 Pakistan South Waziristan 1 0 An elderly man is shot to
death by Islamic terrorists.
8/10/2008 Pakistan Kurram 10 24 A second day of Sunni-Shia sectarian
violence leaves ten people dead.
8/10/2008 Pakistan Hangu 1 0 Taliban hardliners are suspected in the
shooting death of a local cop.
8/10/2008 Algeria Tigzirt 3 0 Islamic fundamentalists blow up a police
station, killing three officers.
8/10/2008 Algeria Zemmouri 8 19 Eight Algerians are killed by a
suicide bomber.
8/10/2008 Saudi Arabia Riyadh 1 0 A 26-year-old woman has her tongue
cut out, then is set on fire by her father (a moral policeman) for
converting to Christianity.
8/10/2008 China Xinjiang 8 4 Eight people are killed in a series of
suicide bomb attacks by Muslim militants.
8/10/2008 Iraq Baghdad 9 46 Jihad bombers murder nine Iraqis in three
attacks.
8/10/2008 Philippines Midsayap 3 0 Moro Islamist snipers take out
three local soldiers.
8/9/2008 Pakistan Swat 8 15 Eight local cops are shot to death inside
their station by Islamic radicals.
8/9/2008 Iraq Baqubah 16 0 An al-Qaeda mass grave is discovered. Five
women are among the sixteen victims tortured and murdered.
8/9/2008 Iraq Baghdad 1 2 Fundamentalists shoot at a swimming pool
manager, injuring him but killing one of his sons.
8/9/2008 Algeria Zemmouri 8 8 A suicide bomber takes out eight
Algerians along a city street.
8/9/2008 Pakistan Kurram 16 25 Sunnis and Shia settle their sectarian
differences with gunfire, leaving sixteen dead.
8/9/2008 Nigeria Kano 1 0 A 50-year-old man is beaten to death by a
Muslim mob for alleged blasphemy.
8/9/2008 Somalia Alamada 4 2 Three civilians and a local cop are
murdered in a grenade attack by Islamic militia.
8/8/2008 Afghanistan Paktika 5 0 Five local cops are murdered by
Islamic bombers.
8/8/2008 Pakistan Bajaur 3 0 Three civilians are murdered by the
Taliban - two by beheading.
8/8/2008 Iraq Tal Afar 25 74 Jihadis bomb a marketplace, slaughtering
over twenty Iraqis.
8/8/2008 Afghanistan Kunar 1 2 A child is killed in a Taliban ambush.
8/8/2008 Pakistan Sadeeqabad 22 0 Twenty-two soldiers, some wounded,
are riddled with bullets after being captured by Mujahideen.
8/8/2008 Thailand Yala 2 0 A fruit trader having dinner with his wife
is among two people shot to death by Muslim terrorists in separate
attacks.
8/8/2008 Thailand Pattani 1 0 A 60-year-old Buddhist is beheaded by
Islam's Holy Warriors.
8/7/2008 Phillipines Zamboanga 2 1 A 16-year-old and his father are
shot to death by suspected Abu Sayyaf militants.
8/7/2008 Pakistan Swat 4 0 Fundamentalists burn down a girls school
then shoot three people to death and behead another.
8/7/2008 Iraq Mosul 4 6 Terrorists plant a bomb on a corpse, luring
four investigators to their deaths.
8/6/2008 Iraq Baquba 16 0 Sixteen men kidnapped by Sunni extremists
are found bound and executed.
8/6/2008 Iraq Mosul 1 11 A suicide bomber kills a civilian and injures
eleven more.
8/6/2008 Thailand Yala 0 1 A school principal is shot multiple times
by Shahid while on his way home.
8/6/2008 Pakistan Swat 2 15 Islamic militants burn down several girls
schools and kill two people, including a child, in separate attacks.
8/6/2008 Pakistan Tirah 4 12 Fighting breaks out between Islamic
fundamentalist groups, leaving four dead.
8/6/2008 Afghanistan Lashkar Gah 7 2 Religious extremists attack a
police post, killing seven local officers.
8/6/2008 Somalia Lafoole 1 0 Islamic radicals gun down the head of an
orphanage.
8/5/2008 Iraq Basra 1 0 Fundamentalists shoot a barber to death for
shaving beards.
8/5/2008 Iraq Kirkuk 3 0 al-Qaeda militants slit the throats of three
Iraqis.
8/5/2008 Philippines Aleosan 1 0 One person is killed when Moro
Islamic terrorists storm a sugar plantation.
8/5/2008 Ingushetia Nazran 2 4 Muslim hardliners take down two local
cops in separate Kalashnikov attacks.
8/4/2008 Iraq Baghdad 2 15 Jihadis manage to kill two civilians with a
roadside bomb.
8/4/2008 China Xinjiang 16 16 Islamists stage a brutal grenade attack
on a group of police, killing sixteen.
8/3/2008 Pakistan Temargara 2 2 Two government tax collectors are shot
to death by Sharia-minded militants.
8/3/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 20 47 Twenty civilians, mostly women
streetsweepers, are blown to bits by a massive bomb planted by
Islamists.
8/3/2008 Algeria Kabylie 0 25 Twenty-five people are injured in a
suicide blast.
8/3/2008 Afghanistan Helmand 1 0 Islamic extremists gun down a local
judge.
8/3/2008 Iraq Latifiyah 6 13 Six civilians are killed by a Jihad
roadside blast.
8/3/2008 Iraq Baghdad 12 22 Islamic terrorists manage to kill a dozen
Iraqis with a truck bomb.
8/3/2008 Afghanistan Ghazni 4 0 Religious extremists storm a police
post, killing four officers.
8/3/2008 Afghanistan Paktika 0 0 Two clerics are killed while trying
to assemble a suicide vest in their mosque.
8/3/2008 Pakistan Bajaur 1 0 A civilian is shot to death by Sunni
extremists.
8/3/2008 Sudan Nyala 6 28 Janjaweed militia ambush a civilian convoy,
killing six people.
8/3/2008 Afghanistan Gardiz 3 0 Three civilians are murdered by
Taliban militants.
8/2/2008 Pakistan Kabal 8 5 Islamic hard-liners bomb a police van
killing eight people.
8/2/2008 Pal. Auth. Gaza 1 16 A young boy is killed in fighting
between the Muslim terror groups, Hamas and Fatah.
8/2/2008 India Ramban 1 0 A youth is shot to death by Islamic
militants.
8/2/2008 Thailand Yala 1 0 A 29-year-old civilian is shot to death
while riding a motorcycle.
8/2/2008 Afghanistan Kandahar 13 6 The bride and groom are among
thirteen people blown to bits when Islamists target a wedding party
with a bomb.
8/2/2008 Iraq Baqubah 5 3 Sunni radicals murder five Iraqis with a
roadside bomb.
8/2/2008 Ingushetia Nazran 1 1 Suspected Islamists open up on two
policemen with automatic weapons.
8/1/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 1 0 Islamic militia blast a Ugandan
peacekeeper to death with a bomb planted at an airport.
8/1/2008 India Reasi 1 0 A boy is abducted by Mujahid, who then slit
his throat.
8/1/2008 Afghanistan Kunar 1 0 Radical Sunnis take out a civilian in a
roadside blast.
8/1/2008 Iraq Rashad 3 1 Jihadis kill three Iraqis with a roadside
bomb.
8/1/2008 Afghanistan Nimroz 3 5 Two children and a woman are murdered
by a Fedayeen suicide bomber.
7/31/2008 Jordan Nqeira 1 0 A man shoots his 23-year-old sister to
death on suspicion that she had unmarried sex.
7/31/2008 Iraq Mosul 2 0 Fundamentalists kill two women over suspected
immorality. One is beheaded.
7/31/2008 Iraq Shaheed 3 4 A Fedayeen suicide bomber takes out three
Iraqi police.
7/31/2008 Iraq Mosul 3 0 A judge and two bodyguards are taken out by
Islamic terrorists.
7/31/2008 Somalia Hodan 2 0 A civilian and a police officer are gunned
down in an ambush by Mujahid.
7/31/2008 Thailand Pattani 1 0 A 57-year-old schoolteacher is shot to
death by Muslim militants at close-range.
7/31/2008 Pakistan Deolai 7 0 Five children and their parents are
killed when a shell hits their house following an ambush by Muslim
militants.
7/30/2008 Ingushetia Nazran 5 5 Islamic hardliners are suspected in a
car bomb attack that leaves five people dead.
7/30/2008 Pakistan Dera Ismail Khan 1 3 Islamic extremists ambush a
vehicle, shooting one occupant to death.
7/29/2008 Pakistan Akhun Killay 2 0 Two people are shot to death by
Mujahideen.
7/29/2008 Pakistan Degan 1 0 A young woman is abducted and shot three
times in the chest by Sunni extremists, who then dump the body in a
sewer.
7/29/2008 Philippines Mindanao 4 1 Four Christian passengers are
pulled from a bus and murdered by Islamic terrorists.
7/28/2008 Iraq Mussayab 1 0 A woman is abducted, tied up and then
murdered by suspected fundamentalists.
7/28/2008 Afghanistan Nuristan 3 0 A Taliban rocket attack on a
residential area leaves three dead.
7/28/2008 Pakistan Mohmand 1 0 A 60-year-old man is abducted and
murdered by the Mujahideen.
7/28/2008 Pakistan Matta 3 2 Three Pakistanis in a truck are shot to
death by Tehrik-e-Taliban terrorists.
7/28/2008 Iraq Baghdad 32 102 Three female suicide bombers run into
crowds of Shia pilgrims before detonating. Some thirty-two innocents
are killed.
7/28/2008 Iraq Kirkuk 38 178 A fedayeen suicide bomber attacks a
political rally, slaughtering nearly forty people.
7/28/2008 Pakistan Kohat 2 12 A teenager is among two people blown
apart when Islamic militants detonate a bomb attached to a bicycle.
7/27/2008 Pakistan Charbagh 1 5 A child is killed when fundamentalists
bomb a shopping center.
7/27/2008 Iraq Buhriz 2 0 Two oil workers are murdered by Jihadi
bombers.
7/27/2008 Iraq Fallujah 2 2 Radical Sunnis bomb a house, killing two
occupants.
7/27/2008 Iraq Baghdad 7 0 Seven young Shia pilgrims on foot are shot
at point-blank range by Sunni gunmen.
7/26/2008 Indonesia Jakarata 0 265 Over two-hundred people are injured
when a Muslim mob storms a Christian school.
7/26/2008 Iraq Hilla 1 0 Islamic gunmen take down a 4-year-old girl.
7/26/2008 Lebanon Tripoli 9 50 A 10-year-old boy and a woman are among
nine people killed in a sectarian conflict between Sunni and Alawite.
7/26/2008 Somalia Gedo 3 0 Islamic militia shoot three people to death
at a roadblock.
7/26/2008 Pakistan Dera Bugti 3 0 Three local cops are murdered by
Islamists in separate attacks.
7/26/2008 India Ahmedabad 57 161 Islamic bombers rock India for a
second day, setting seventeen bombs and killing over fifty innocent
people.
7/25/2008 Bangladesh Sadar 1 0 Suspected Jama'atul Mujahideen strangle
a woman, then hang her from a tree.
7/25/2008 India Bangalore 2 10 Islamists set off a series of bombs,
leaving two innocents dead, including a woman.
7/25/2008 Pal. Auth. Gaza 1 3 A bomb set outside a Christian cafe
kills one person.
7/25/2008 Pal. Auth. Gaza 1 15 A bomb kills a young girl.
7/24/2008 India Srinagar 5 28 Four children, ages 4 to 12, are killed
along with a woman from the same family of migrant workers when
Islamic terrorists throw a grenade into a bus stop.
7/24/2008 Afghanistan Paktia 3 4 Talibanis murder three local police
with a bomb.
7/24/2008 Philippines Digos 2 10 A group tied to the Moro Islamic
Front is suspected in the bombing of a bus in which two people died.
7/24/2008 Iraq Baqubah 8 25 A female suicide bomber kills eight Sunni
Iraqis.
7/24/2008 Yemen Sayoun 4 12 al-Qaeda is suspected in the car bombing
of a ministry building that leaves four dead.
7/24/2008 India Doda 4 0 A woman and a 13-year-old girl are among four
civilians shot to death during a Hizb-ul-Mujahideen home invasion.
7/24/2008 Thailand Pattani 1 0 Islamists shoot a 63-year-old villager
to death.
7/24/2008 Thailand Pattani 1 0 A 30-year-old schoolteacher is murdered
by Islamic gunmen on his way to work.
7/23/2008 Iraq Muqdadiyah 1 0 A young woman is killed in a Jihad
roadside bombing.
7/23/2008 Afghanistan Nangarhar 1 2 Religious extremists murder a
local cop with a bomb.
7/23/2008 Algeria Lakhdaria 0 13 A suicide bomber on a motorbike
injures thirteen Algerians.
7/23/2008 Somalia Jowhar 1 0 Islamic militia assassinate a local
official.
7/23/2008 Thailand Pattani 1 0 Islamists gun down a school bus driver
in a drive-by shooting.
7/22/2008 Thailand Narathiwat 1 5 A local soldier is killed in an
Islamist bomb blast.
7/22/2008 Philippines Aleosan 1 1 Moro Islamists shoot a 62-year-old
woman to death as she is farming her field.
7/22/2008 Afghanistan Ghazni 4 1 The Taliban kidnaps a man after
invading his home and killing his four sons.
7/22/2008 Afghanistan Khost 4 3 A woman and child are among four
civilians blown up by Sunni bombers.
7/22/2008 Thailand Narathiwat 1 0 A 41-year-old rubber worker is shot
to death by Muslim militants.
7/22/2008 Israel Jerusalem 0 11 A Palestinian attempts to run Israelis
down with a bulldozer.
7/21/2008 Afghanistan North Waziristan 2 0 Two civilians are abducted
and murdered by Talibanis.
7/21/2008 Pakistan Bajur 1 2 Islamic militants gun down an elderly man
riding in a car.
7/21/2008 Iraq Mosul 6 8 Freedom Fighters murder six Iraqis in various
attacks.
7/21/2008 Afghanistan Paktika 1 3 Sunni extremists attack the home of
a former governor, killing him and injuring members of his family.
7/21/2008 Iraq Saidiya 7 8 al-Qaeda kill seven Iraqis by planting a
bomb on a tractor.
7/21/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 7 12 Three children are among seven killed
in an Islamic militia mortar attack.
7/21/2008 China Kunming 2 10 The Turkestan Islamic Party takes credit
for a bus bombing that leaves two dead.
7/20/2008 Thailand Pattani 3 0 Islamic terrorists shoot three
villagers to death.
7/20/2008 Chechnya Grozny 3 0 Suspect Islamic rebels kill three
policemen in cold blood.
7/20/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 6 11 Six people are killed when Islamic
hardliners attack a government patrol along a city street.
7/20/2008 Iraq Basra 1 0 A suspected prostitute is shot to death by
fundamentalists.
7/20/2008 India Reasi 1 0 A civilian is shot to death outside his home
by Mujahideen.
7/20/2008 India Gulmarg 2 5 An 8-year-old boy is among two people
killed when Islamic terrorists toss a grenade into a resort.
7/20/2008 Afghanistan Laghman 6 0 Six civilians are killed when Sunni
hardliners blow up a fuel truck and a nearby minibus with a rocket.
7/19/2008 Afghanistan Kandahar 4 1 Sunni extremists murder four local
cops with a roadside bomb.
7/19/2008 India Srinagar 10 16 Hizb-ul-Mujahedeen kill ten Indian
soldiers in transport with a horrific bomb attack on their convoy.
7/19/2008 Lebanon Ain el-Helweh 1 0 Jund al-Sham gunmen take out a
member of a reconciliation committee.
7/19/2008 Pakistan Tirah 9 10 Lashkar-e-Islam and Ansar-ul-Islam clash
over sectarian differences, leaving nine people dead.
7/19/2008 Pakistan Mohmand 4 0 The Taliban murder four hostages in
cold blood.
7/19/2008 Iraq Tikrit 3 0 Freedom Fighters kill three Iraqis with
automatic weapons.
7/19/2008 Turkey Bosphorus 1 0 A gay man is shot to death in a
suspected 'honor' killing.
7/19/2008 Ethiopia Jijiga 0 2 Two former Muslims who converted to
Christianity are attacked by a stone-throwing mob of Muslims.
7/19/2008 Pal. Auth. Jabaliya 1 0 Suspected Hamas militants shoot a
Fatah activist in his home.
7/18/2008 Pakistan North Waziristan 1 0 The head of a local madrassa
is gunned down by sectarian rivals.
7/18/2008 Afghanistan Helmand 3 4 Three Afghan guards are killed when
religious hardliners bomb their convoy.
7/18/2008 India Banihal 0 36 Three dozen people, mostly women and
children, are injured when Islamic terrorists toss a grenade into a
crowded market.
7/18/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 3 0 Muslim gunmen shoot three elders to
death for helping humanitarian effots.
7/18/2008 Iraq Mosul 4 7 A Fedayeen suicide bomber takes out four
Iraqis.
7/18/2008 Pakistan South Waziristan 3 0 Three civilians are brutally
executed by al-Qaeda backed militants.
7/18/2008 India Udhampur 1 0 A civilian is abducted and murdered by
the Hizb-ul-Mujahideen.
7/17/2008 Pakistan Mohmand 3 0 Three people are killed when rival
Islamist groups clash.
7/17/2008 Somalia Huriwa 5 3 A mother and her two children are among
five killed when Holy Warriors stage an ambush.
7/17/2008 Afghanistan Zabul 1 5 Taliban militants attack a convoy,
killing an Afghan.
7/17/2008 India Murshidabad 1 0 A Hindu man is beheaded by Muslims,
angry that he married a Muslim woman.
7/16/2008 Iraq Tal Afar 18 90 Mujahdeen detonate a car bomb along a
city street, slaughtering at least eighteen Iraqis, including seven
children.
7/16/2008 Iraq Mosul 2 9 Jihadis kill two Iraqis with a car bomb.
7/16/2008 Iraq Baghdad 3 7 A female al-Qaeda suicide bomber detonates
in the house a Sunni family, killing three people.
7/16/2008 India Doda 1 0 Islamic militants abduct and murder a
civilian.
7/16/2008 Pakistan Lahore 1 0 A teenaged Christian boy is kidnapped,
tortured for two days, then killed by Muslims for dating a Muslim
girl.
7/15/2008 Iraq Mosul 12 6 Two suicide bombers take out a dozen Iraqis
in separate attacks.
7/15/2008 Pakistan Khyber 7 5 Rival Islamic groups continue to work
out their differences by shooting at each other (seven more dead).
7/15/2008 Chechnya Grozny 1 3 A local cop is murdered in a staged
Mujahideen ambush.
7/15/2008 Iraq Baqubah 35 69 Fedayeen bombers massacre nearly forty
Iraqis, including first responders.
7/14/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 1 0 Islamic militia gun down a man sitting
in a tea shop.
7/14/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 2 2 Two woman are murdered in a shooting
attack by Mujahideen.
7/14/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 4 4 Islamic militia kill four local
soldiers in two ambushes.
7/14/2008 Iraq Baghdad 3 14 Three people are killed when a Muslim
terrorist tosses a grenade into a gathering.
7/14/2008 India Doda 1 2 Islamists toss a grenade into a police
station, killing at least one local officer.
7/14/2008 Afghanistan Paktika 7 2 Sunni extremists take out a car with
a roadside bomb, killing seven civilians.
7/14/2008 Thailand Songkhla 1 1 A local security patrol is ambushed by
Islamic militants, leaving one member dead.
7/13/2008 Iraq Baghdad 11 18 Eleven Iraqis are killed in at least
three Mujahid attacks around the country.
7/13/2008 Pakistan Kharqamar 1 0 A civilian is abducted and beheaded
by devoted members of the Religion of Peace.
7/13/2008 Pakistan Khyber 6 10 Lashkar-e-Islam and Ansar-ul-Islam
continue to work out their differences (six more dead).
7/13/2008 Afghanistan Oruzgan 25 30 A suicide attack near a busy
market leaves over two dozen people dead.
7/12/2008 Iraq Tal Afar 7 0 The bodies of seven people kidnapped by
Islamic terrorists are discovered.
7/12/2008 Iraq Mosul 3 4 A woman and two local cops are murdered by
Sunni radicals in separate attacks.
7/12/2008 Chechnya Grozny 1 2 Mujahideen detonate a bomb hidden in a
trash can, killing one person.
7/12/2008 Afghanistan Bargi Matal 1 0 A youth is killed defending his
village from a Taliban attack.
7/12/2008 Pakistan Tirah 7 5 Two women are among seven people killed
in clashes between rival Islamist groups.
7/12/2008 Afghanistan Ghazi 2 0 The Taliban force two female
prostitutes to their knees, then shoot them.
7/12/2008 Pakistan Hangu 16 0 Sixteen pro-government tribesmen are
killed by the Taliban, eight by execution.
7/12/2008 Algeria Beni Djemaa 1 0 Fundamentalists behead a 66-year-old
farmer.
7/12/2008 Afghanistan Helmand 4 5 A Fedayeen bomber in a suicide vest
kills four local soldiers on routine patrol.
7/11/2008 Pakistan Karachi 1 0 The head of a Shia mosque is murdered
by Sunni gunmen.
7/11/2008 Somalia Taredishe 1 0 Suspected Islamic militia gun down two
aid workers in separate attacks as they are handing out food.
7/10/2008 Pakistan Kurram 7 12 The Taliban kill seven civilians in two
landmine attacks.
7/10/2008 India Kupwara 1 1 Islamic militants ambush two local police,
killing one.
7/10/2008 Somalia Afgyoye 1 0 Islamists with automatic weapons shoot a
Christian man to death for not praying toward Mecca.
7/10/2008 Somalia Baidoa 2 4 Two local soldiers are beheaded by the Al-
Shabab Islamist group.
7/10/2008 Pakistan Khyber 8 0 Two women are among eight killed when
militants fire mortars into two homes.
7/10/2008 Pakistan Tirah 5 15 Rival Islamist groups clash, leaving
five people dead.
7/10/2008 Iraq Baghdad 2 13 Two civilians are murdered when Jihadis
detonate a car bomb in a residential neighborhood.
7/10/2008 Pakistan Bajaur 1 2 Islamic militants kill a 15-year-old
girl in a targeted rocket attack on a home.
7/10/2008 Pakistan Dosli 1 0 A doctor is shot four times in the chest.
A note pinned to the body accuses him of 'opposing Islam and Jihad.'
7/9/2008 Ingushetia Muzhichi 3 0 Islamic rebels kill three local
policemen in a shooting attack.
7/9/2008 Lebanon Tripoli 4 54 Four people are killed in a Religion of
Peace sectarian clash.
7/9/2008 Iraq Baqubah 4 11 Jihadis bomb a funeral procession, killing
four mourners.
7/9/2008 Iraq Baghdad 6 8 Muslim gunmen fire inside a rival mosque,
murdering four attendees.
7/9/2008 Iraq Mosul 8 41 Eight Iraqis are murdered by Mujahideen
bombers.
7/9/2008 Sudan Umm Hakibah 7 22 Janjaweed militants attack a group of
Africans working as UN peacekeepers, killing seven.
7/9/2008 Pakistan Kurram 1 1 One man is killed and another loses his
leg after an encounter with the handiwork of Taliban bombers.
7/9/2008 Pakistan Mardan 2 1 Islamic militants fire on a police van,
killing two officers.
7/9/2008 Jordan Mafraq 1 0 A 16-year-old girl is stabbed to death by
her brother on suspicion of pre-marital sex.
7/9/2008 Turkey Istanbul 3 0 al-Qaeda gunmen stage a brutal attack on
the US consulate that leaves three guards dead.
7/9/2008 Iraq Fallujah 6 18 Six elderly people are blown apart by a
double bombing at a mosque.
7/8/2008 Pakistan Karachi 1 37 Religious hardliners set off a series
of bombs, killing at least one person.
7/8/2008 Thailand Pattani 2 0 A husband and wife team of laborers is
shot, showered with gas and then burned by radical Muslims.
7/8/2008 Iraq Mosul 4 8 Sunni bombers kill four contractors traveling
in a vehicle.
7/8/2008 Philippines Pagangan 1 0 A farmer is killed following an
ambush by Moro Islamists.
7/8/2008 Pakistan Bara 5 3 Hardliners ambush a security vehicle,
killing five local cops.
7/8/2008 Iraq Ramadi 22 0 Twenty-two victims of sectarian violence are
discovered buried at an elementary school.
7/7/2008 Thailand Pattani 2 3 Islamists open fire on a bus full of
Buddhist teenagers, killing two guards.
7/7/2008 Iraq Baghdad 17 40 Various attacks by the Mujahideen leave
about seventeen innocent people dead, including women.
7/7/2008 Somalia Baidoa 2 7 al-Shabab terrorists attack a government
facility, killing two people.
7/7/2008 Afghanistan Kabul 65 147 Sunni hardliners bomb an Indian
embassy, killing over sixty people, including seventeen children.
7/7/2008 Pakistan Quetta 1 0 A Shia lawyer is shot to death by
sectarian rivals.
7/7/2008 Pakistan Swat 1 0 A religious leader is killed by rival
Muslims.
7/6/2008 USA Atlanta, Georgia 1 0 A devout Muslim strangles his 25-
year-old daughter in an honor killing.
7/6/2008 Philippines Kauswagan 5 0 Five people are killed in a
shooting attack on a bus by suspected Moro Islamic terrorists.
7/6/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 1 0 Islamists gun down a UN official in
charge of development.
7/6/2008 Iraq Mussayab 1 0 Suspected fundamentalists kidnap and
torture a woman to death.
7/6/2008 Iraq Jalawla 7 12 Seven members of the same family are
murdered by a well-placed roadside bomb.
7/6/2008 Iraq Baghdad 6 14 Jihadis kill six Iraqis with a car bomb.
7/6/2008 Pakistan Islamabad 19 23 A brutal suicide attack by a
teenager near a market and a police station leaves about two dozen
dead and many more maimed and bloodied.
7/6/2008 Pakistan Quetta 1 1 A prominent Shia is killed in a sectarian
killing that also leaves a young boy injured.
7/5/2008 Iraq Mosul 3 6 Islamic militants manage to kill three Iraqis
in two bombing and shooting attacks.
7/5/2008 Thailand Yala 4 4 Muslim gunmen open up on a crowd eating
breakfast at a tea shop, killing four.
7/5/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 6 0 A married couple is blown up with four
others by a bomb planted by Islamic fundamentalists.
7/4/2008 Afghanistan Kandahar 1 0 Islamic hardliners are suspected in
the assassination of a local official walking home from work.
7/4/2008 Thailand Yala 1 1 Islamists shoot a Buddhist, hammer nails
through his hands, behead him and then set his body on fire. The man's
son is seriously injured as well.
7/4/2008 Thailand Pattani 1 0 A retired schoolteacher is gunned down
by Islamic militants.
7/4/2008 Thailand Yala 1 0 Muslim radicals shoot a 42-year-old man to
death.
7/4/2008 India Kupwara 5 0 Five Indian army personnel are massacred in
a Mujahideen ambush.
7/4/2008 Afghanistan Maidan-Wardak 2 5 Two Afghan security personnel
are taken out in a Taliban bombing.
7/3/2008 Pakistan Khyber 5 4 Five people are killed when rival
Islamist groups clash.
7/3/2008 Somalia Hiiran 10 0 Ten civilians are killed in an ambush by
Islamic militia.
7/3/2008 Thailand Yala 1 0 A school principal is shot to death by
Muslim radicals.
7/3/2008 Iraq Baghdad 4 8 Four Iraqis are blown apart by an Islamist
bomb.
7/3/2008 Iraq Samarra 14 0 Fourteen victims of Sunni terrorists are
discovered in a mass grave.
7/3/2008 Afghanistan Kandahar 8 3 Eight local police are killed in a
brutal ambush by Sunni militants.
7/2/2008 Afghanistan Logar 5 0 The Taliban murder five local soldiers
with a roadside blast.
7/2/2008 Afghanistan Nimroz 5 2 Five people are murdered by a Fedayeen
suicide bomber.
7/2/2008 Iraq Baghdad 3 6 A streetsweeper is among three people killed
in a Mujahideen roadside bombing.
7/2/2008 Israel Jerusalem 3 57 Two teachers, including a mother, are
among three people are killed when a Palestinian goes on a violent
rampage with a bulldozer.
7/2/2008 Thailand Narathiwat 1 0 Islamic gunmen murder a woman shortly
after she drops her daughter off at school.
7/2/2008 India Bhaderwah 1 20 A man later dies of injuries suffered
when Islamists toss a grenade into the street.
7/1/2008 Iraq Mosul 2 32 Two Jihad bombs leave two dead and about
forty wounded.
7/1/2008 Iraq Mandali 4 16 A Fedayeen suicide bomber sends four Iraqis
to Allah.
7/1/2008 Philippines Aleosan 1 0 A Christian man is shot to death
after refusing to give up his property to Moro Islamic Front raiders.
7/1/2008 Somalia Mataban 53 40 Fifty-three people are killed in a
series of ambushes by Islamic militants.
7/1/2008 Pakistan Swat 5 3 An elderly woman is among five people shot
to death by Islamists in four separate attacks.
7/1/2008 Afghanistan Lashkar Gah 2 7 Taliban bombers kill two local
policemen.
7/1/2008 Iraq Buhriz 3 1 Three members of the same family are murdered
by Mujahideen bombers.
6/30/2008 Somalia Mogadishu 1 0 Muslim radicals kidnap and kill a
humanitarian aid worker.
6/30/2008 Thailand Yala 1 0 A 46-year-old man is shot to death by
Islamic terrorists.
6/29/2008 Pakistan Swat 6 5 Islamic militants kill six people in at
least two separate bombings.
6/29/2008 Iraq Udhaim 3 0 Mujahid kill two women and a child with a
mortar attack on their home.
6/29/2008 Iraq Duluiya 7 3 A Fedayeen suicide bomber murders seven
Iraqis.
6/29/2008 Pakistan Swat 1 0 A civilian is beheaded by Sunni radicals.
6/29/2008 Afghanistan Farah 4 5 Religious extremists attack a local
police post, killing four officers.
6/28/2008 Iraq Samarrah 50 0 A mass grave is discovered containing
women and children among fifty people rounded up by Sunni militants
and executed.
6/28/2008 Lebanon Tripoli 2 25 Shia terrorists detonate a bomb in an
apartment building, killing two residents.
6/28/2008 Pakistan Khyber 8 5 A sectarian disagreement leaves eight
dead.
6/28/2008 Afghanistan Faryab 8 0 Eight local cops are ambushed and
killed by Talibanis.
6/28/2008 Iraq Samarrah 7 0 Seven dead torture victims, including a
woman, are found in an al-Qaeda hideout.
6/27/2008 Thailand Narathiwat 1 1 A 36-year-old civilian is shot to
death by Mujahid after dropping his children off at school.
6/27/2008 Algeria Jijel 6 14 Six security personnel are taken out by
al-Qaeda gunmen.
6/27/2008 Chechnya Vedeno 4 0 Four police are ambushed and killed by
Jihad fighters.
6/27/2008 Iraq Khanaqin 1 2 Islamic militants kill a shepherd with a
well-placed bomb.
6/27/2008 Iraq Shurqat 2 3 al-Qaeda takes out two Iraqis with a
roadside blast.
6/27/2008 Pakistan Damadola 2 0 A mob screaming "Allah Akbar" slits
the throats of two Afghans, then beheads them.
6/27/2008 Thailand Pattani 1 0 A 64-year-old man is murdered by
Islamic gunmen.
6/26/2008 Pakistan Barikot 7 0 Islamists burn down a girls school and
kill a family of seven.
6/26/2008 Iraq Karma 20 24 A Fedayeen suicide bomber murders twenty
innocents.
6/26/2008 Iraq Mosul 17 62 Jihadis successfully take out seventeen
Iraqis with a well-placed car bomb.
6/25/2008 Pakistan Jandola 28 0 Twenty-eight members of a local peace
council are murdered by the Taliban.
6/25/2008 Somalia Deynile 9 0 Nine local police are ambushed and
killed by Islamic militia.
6/25/2008 Iraq Baghdad 5 25 Two Jihad bombings leave five Iraqis
dead.
Stop apologizing to Muslims.
Tell them to take responsibility and stop the violence
Topaz
"This is the largest terrorist group operating within America.
On January 26, 1972, a JDL team firebombed the New York City offices
of a US-Soviet cultural exchange agency. Killed in the fire was a
27-year-old secretary (who happened to be Jewish). Thirteen others
were injured. One participant, Sheldon Siegel, confessed to police
that he had made the bomb, and provided the names of the others
involved in the crime. Several years later Kahane acknowledged JDL
responsibility for the crime. However, the case against the JDL
members who were charged in the incident was eventually dismissed on a
technicality. (note 36)
In May 1972, ten JDL thugs broke into the Austrian consulate in
Washington, DC, and beat Austria's ambassador to the US, Karl Gruber,
as well as the building's janitor. (note 37)
In May 1974, JDL members attacked Arab-American community activist Dr.
Mohammed Mehdi with a lead pipe, sending him to the hospital with a
broken back. It took nearly a year for the police to make an arrest,
even though a perpetrator had appeared on television to boast of the
deed. A short time later, Mehdi's offices in Manhattan were almost
totally destroyed in an apparent arson attack. (note 38)
On February 21, 1975, a US federal court found Kahane guilty of
violating terms of a probation stemming from his 1971 felony
conviction for manufacturing firebombs. He had been forbidden from
having anything to do with bombs, dynamite or other weapons, or
encouraging violence. Citing incriminating letters written by Kahane
in which he had urged followers to assassinate Russian and Arab
diplomats, the judge sentenced the rabbi to one year imprisonment.
Kahane served eight months of this term in a Manhattan halfway house,
which he was allowed to leave every day to eat in kosher restaurants.
Kahane used this period of "imprisonment" to conduct JDL business.
(note 39)
In 1975, 21-year-old JDL member David Kamaiko hijacked an executive
helicopter in New York City, demanding $2 million ransom to buy guns
for the JDL. Kamaiko shot the pilot before he was himself subdued.
(note 40)
In 1978, Canadian JDL leader Joseph Schachter bombed the home of
right-wing activist Donald Andrews. (note 41)
On April 11, 1982, JDL member Allan Goodman opened fire with a machine
gun at a Muslim house of worship in Jerusalem, killing two Palestinian
Arabs: an elderly man and a 20-year-old youth. After entering the
mosque, he continued firing, critically wounding several people.
Goodman, from Baltimore, Maryland, had received paramilitary training
at the JDL's Camp Jedel in New York state. In an interview, Kahane
said of the crime, "There was nothing wrong with what he did...the act
was perfectly correct." (note 42)
In 1987, three members of the Jewish Defense League were arrested for
their involvement in at least six bombing attacks carried out the New
York area between 1984 and 1987. The accused were Jay Cohen, Sharon
Katz and Victor Vancier, head of the JDL in the New York area. After
admitting his role in the terror bombings, Vancier was sentenced in
October 1987 to ten years imprisonment. Another JDL member, Murray
Young, was sentenced to five years in prison. (note 43)
FBI officials believe that the JDL was behind the bomb blast in
mid-August 1985 that killed Tscherim Soobzokov in Paterson, New
Jersey, and a similar (although non-fatal) bombing attack in early
September 1985 directed against Elmars Sprogis in Brentwood, New York.
Soobzokov and Sprogis were falsely alleged to have been "Nazi war
criminals." (note 44)
In January 1991, Kurt Haber-identified in newspaper reports as a
"Jewish Holocaust survivor"-was charged with making criminal threats
against the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee. (note 45)
Alex Odeh Murder
Perhaps the most widely-publicized crime in which the JDL has been
implicated is the murder on October 11, 1985, of Alex Odeh, West Coast
regional director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.
Odeh was killed in a bomb blast when he entered his group's office in
Santa Ana, southern California. (note 46)
An FBI official announced in 1985 that the Jewish Defense League was
believed responsible for the murder of Odeh and at least two other
terrorist incidents on the East Coast. "We are attributing the three
bombings to the JDL," said FBI official Lane Bonner. (note 47)
Similarly, an FBI report released in July 1986 cited "elements" of the
Jewish Defense League as responsible for the murder of Odeh. (note 48)
Three JDL members were identified by US federal investigators in 1988
as the perpetrators of the bombing that took Odeh's life. The accused
assassins, who were born in the USA but fled to Israel to avoid
punishment, are Keith Fuchs, Andy Green and Robert Manning. (note 49)
Law enforcement officials in Los Angeles and New York have named
Robert Manning-an important Jewish Defense League activist-as a
suspect in at least four political bombings in 1985, including the one
that killed Odeh. Manning, authorities said, had a two-decade history
of violent activities that also included threats against producers of
a television show. (note 50)
After joining the southern California chapter of the Jewish Defense
League as a charter member in 1971, Manning quickly earned a
reputation as a particularly tough street fighter. JDL chief Irv Rubin
praised him as a "pretty strong boy. I've seen him fight. We tangled
with Nazis in the streets, Arabs in the streets. He was a real active
guy." (note 51) In a 1988 court document, a federal prosecutor wrote:
"It became known that [Manning], while purporting to act on behalf of
the Jewish cause, on several occasions placed or threw explosive
devices at locations of Arab antagonists." (note 52)
The Israeli government sought to obstruct the FBI's investigation of
the Odeh slaying, the federal agency charged in November 1987. (note
53) Manning himself tried to evade extradition by claiming heart
trouble, by taking 20 sleeping pills, and by charging that he was
being wrongfully persecuted simply because he is a pious, orthodox
Jew. In spite of all this, Manning was finally extradited to the
United States in July 1993. (note 54)
Official Confirmation of JDL Terrorism
The US Justice Department's Federal Bureau of Investigation has
repeatedly characterized the JDL as a terrorist and criminal
organization. A report issued in 1985 by the FBI's Terrorist Research
and Analytical Center confirmed: (note 55)
In FBI terrorism analyses published since 1981, responsibility for 18
terrorist incidents has been attributed to groups seeking to publicize
past and present injustices suffered by the Jewish people. While
claims for some of these acts have been made in the names of the
"Jewish Defenders,' "United Jewish Underground," and "Jewish Direct
Action," 15 of the incidents were attributed to the Jewish Defense
League (JDL), by far the most well known of these groups.
Also in 1985, the FBI named the Jewish Defense League as the second
most active terrorist group in the United States. (Only Puerto Rican
terrorists were more active during this period.) The FBI linked the
JDL to 37 terrorist attacks carried out from 1977 to 1984. (note 56)
Two years later, the FBI announced that Jewish extremist groups had
carried out 24 terrorist acts from 1981 through 1986, 17 of which were
the work of the Jewish Defense League. (note 57)
Another US federal government agency, the Department of Energy,
similarly characterized the JDL in a report issued in 1986: (note 58)
For more than a decade, the Jewish Defense League (JDL) has been one
of the most active terrorist groups in the United States. Although the
JDL maintains that it is a political action group concerned with
dramatizing the plight of Soviet Jewry and, in more general terms,
protecting Jews and Jewish interests worldwide, the FBI has long
classified it as a terrorist organization.
...The underlying purpose of the JDL is to reverse the mythical image
of the Jews as victims. This militancy also fuels the anti-Soviet
campaign designed to create and foment new sources of tension in
Soviet-American relations ...
The JDL, however, has also attacked Arab, Iranian, Iraqi, Egyptian,
Palestinian, Lebanese, French, and German targets in the United States
... In 1978 [for example], Egyptian diplomats were targeted...Attacks
have also been staged by League chapters in France, Britain, Italy and
Israel.
In more recent years, the official report went on,
The JDL has pursued a dual-track strategy of acts of civil
disobedience and generally peaceful protest, along with acts of
outright terrorism...Bombing is the JDL's favorite tactic, accounting
for 78 percent of all JDL incidents. Shootings are next, accounting
for 16 percent, followed by arson, vandalism, and kidnaping,
accounting for one percent each ...
Since 1968, JDL operations have killed seven persons and wounded at
least 22...Sixty-two percent of all JDL attacks are directed against
property; 30 percent against businesses; four percent against
academics and academic institutions; and two percent against religious
targets.
Typically, an anonymous caller will claim responsibility for a
specific terrorist act for either the JDL or one of its alleged
subgroups, only to have an official spokesman for the JDL deny the
group's involvement the following day.
In the past, although the JDL was among the most active terrorist
organizations in the United States, the threat it posed appeared to be
primarily symbolic...Recent events, however, suggest that this view
requires revision. The increase of militant Jewish terrorism
represents not only an escalation of violence, but a significant
change in targeting patterns, as well as a dramatic shift in tactics.
...The group appears to be concentrating its efforts on persons and
institutions it considers to be enemies of Judaism and Israel. The
targets now [1986] include alleged former Nazis and war criminals;
Palestinian and Arab individuals and institutions; and persons and
so-called research centers promoting views about the Holocaust that
minimize the dimensions of Jewish suffering.
Perhaps the most far-reaching change, however, is the increasing use
of assassination, both to draw attention to the terrorists' causes and
to eliminate perceived enemies of the Jewish people and Israel.
Mordechai Levy and the Jewish Defense Organization
Besides Kahane, two of the most prominent JDL activists have been Irv
Rubin and Mordechai Levy. Each has been repeatedly arrested for
criminal activities.
Until 1982 or 1983, Mordechai (Mark) Levy was one of the most active
of Jewish Defense League activists. (note 59) Among his numerous
arrests was one in 1981 as a suspect in a car bombing. (note 60) On
one occasion he dressed up in a full regalia Nazi uniform to apply for
a parade permit to march at Independence Hall in Philadelphia,
apparently in an effort to alert the local Jewish community to the
"dangers of neo-Nazism." (note 61)
After leaving the JDL (supposedly because it was not "militant
enough") he founded the Jewish Defense Organization. He claimed that
his group, based in New York City, had more than 3,000 members. (The
real figure was probably no more than a few dozen.) In the years that
followed, Levy and rival Zionist militant Irv Rubin engaged in
increasingly bitter feuding.
In August 1989, Levy was arrested following a dramatic night-time
confrontation with Rubin and other JDL members. Fearing that Rubin was
trying to kill him, Levy went to the roof of the building where he
lived and began spraying the lower Manhattan street with semiautomatic
rifle fire, wounding an air-conditioning repairman as he sat in his
parked van. (note 62) Levy was later sentenced to four and a half
years imprisonment for injuring the 69-year-old repairman. (note 63)
On April 22, 1993, Jewish Defense Organization members attacked
demonstrators who had gathered in Washington, DC, to protest the US
Holocaust Memorial Museum. At least one person was seriously injured.
A JDO spokesman told reporters that several members of his group had
attacked and beat "four or five" of the 150 or so persons who had
rallied to express their opposition to the Museum. (note 64)
One of the victims was David Willcox, a 52-year-old employee of the
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. He was standing on a street
corner when three men wearing black "paramilitary" uniforms and skull
caps with the Star of David attacked, beating him on the head and legs
with metal pipes. Willcox required hospitalization and 12 stitches in
his head.
Two JDO members later confirmed the attack against Willcox. JDO
spokesman Michael Schneider told a reporter that his group would
continue to do "whatever is necessary " to "defend" Jews, including
attacking "enemies" in the street. The FBI said that it is
investigating the attack against Willcox as a possible act of
"domestic terrorism," while city police announced that they were
looking into the incident as a possible "hate crime." (As we go to
press, though, no arrests have been made.)
Irv Rubin
Since the early 1970s, Irv Rubin has been perhaps the most prominent
Jewish Defense League activist and spokesman. After a time as leader
of the group's JDL's West coast operations, he emerged as "national
chairman" of the post-Kahane JDL. By 1979, Rubin had managed to get
arrested 39 times in connection with JDL activities. (note 65)
In March 1992, Irv Rubin was arrested on suspicion of conspiring to
commit murder. He was released a few days later after the Los Angeles
district attorney's office determined that police lacked sufficient
evidence to hold him. (note 66)
In August 1992, Rubin's JDL succeeded in forcing a Los Angeles
restaurant and nightclub, the Largo, to cancel a concert on behalf of
the Palestine Aid Society, to raise money for humanitarian assistance.
Rubin warned Largo proprietor Mark Flanagan that he could "expect
trouble" and an "angry protest" unless he cancelled the event. Soon
after, Flanagan discovered that his business' door locks had been
destroyed by still-dripping fast-acting molecular glue. Then, just
hours before the event was to begin, Flanagan canceled the concert out
of fear that patrons might be victims of a possible JDL attack. (note
67)
Violence Against Holocaust Revisionists
Among the most persistent targets of Jewish terrorists in recent years
have been those who reject the generally accepted Holocaust story that
six million Jews were systematically murdered in Europe during the
Second World War.
In recent decades, a growing number of scholars have been citing an
impressive body of evidence that raises serious doubts about many
supposedly well-documented aspects of the Holocaust story. These
"Holocaust revisionists" include acclaimed best-selling British
historian David Irving, French professor Dr. Robert Faurisson and Dr.
Arthur Butz of Northwestern University. (For more about Holocaust
revisionism and the arguments of revisionist historians, write for a
catalog of books, tapes and other material from the Institute for
Historical Review.)
Incidents of violence against revisionist "thought criminals" have
included:
George Ashley, a high school history teacher and supporter of the IHR,
has been the target of several terrorist attacks because of his
revisionist views. In April 1982, two bricks were hurled through the
front window of his suburban Los Angeles home. One month later, two
gasoline fire bombs were thrown against the front of his house, and in
December of 1982, JDL criminals ransacked Ashley's home, causing an
estimated $26,000 in damage. (note 68) Mordechai Levy later boasted:
"We warned him [Ashley] that if he continued his activity, he would
pay a consequence...We warned that if the school board does not stop
Ashley, we would stop him." (note 69) In July 1984, Ashley received
repeated telephone calls from someone who threatened to bomb his home.
A JDL member identified by police from tape-recordings of the threats
was later arrested. (note 70) In August 1984, JDL member Michael S.
Canale was arrested on suspicion of making a bomb threat against
George Ashley. (note 71)
In May 1985, Ashley's home was the target of a another bomb attack, in
which no one was hurt. The letters "JDL" were spray-painted on the
walkway leading to Ashley's front door. (note 72) This attack was
cited in a January 1986 federal government report: (note 73) The
following month [May 1985], the JDL claimed credit for bombing the
house of George Ashley, Los Angeles-area high school teacher who had
told students that the number of Jews killed by the Nazis during World
War II was considerably less than the commonly accepted figure of six
million, and that not more than a million Jews perished during the
war. Dr. Charles Weber, a contributor to the IHR's Journal of
Historical Review, had his car vandalized in two separate incidents
during the month of April 1985. A note from the JDL, which threatened
to escalate the attacks into a bombing, was left behind in the second
incident. (note 74) Dr. Reinhard K. Buchner, a professor of physics at
California State University, Long Beach, and a member of the IHR
Editorial Advisory Committee (1980-1983), was the victim of repeated
JDL harassment in 1981, 1982 and early 1983. He was spat upon,
physically attacked, threatened by phone, and harassed at his office
and home. (note 75) German-Canadian publisher Ernst Zündel, a
prominent revisionist activist, has been repeatedly attacked by the
Jewish Defense League. In December 1983, JDL thugs beat him on the
steps of Toronto's Old City Hall. The JDL carried out another attack
against him on February 6, 1984. In September 1984, Zündel's home in
Toronto was damaged in a pipe-bomb attack. A group calling itself "The
People's Liberation Army of the Jewish Defense League" claimed
responsibility in a phone call to a local television station. In
January 1985, a JDL mob attacked Zündel, his attorney Doug Christie
and Christie's female legal secretary at the entrance to a Toronto
courthouse.
The office of a German-American group was set on fire in 1985,
apparently because of the organization's skepticism about Holocaust
claims. According to a report on terrorism issued in January 1986 by
the federal Department of Energy, in June 1985 (note 76), an anonymous
caller stated that the JDL had intentionally set fire to the offices
of the German-American Political Action Committee in Santa Monica,
California. The German-American group probably incurred the JDL's
wrath by its advocacy of the view that "Jews were not gassed by the
Nazis...[and that] numbers and reports of predetermined extermination
are greatly exaggerated by professional liars."
Target: Institute for Historical Review
Since its founding in 1978, the Institute for Historical Review has
been the leading American publisher of books and other materials
questioning the Holocaust extermination story. For this reason, its
office in southern California, as well as individual IHR employees,
soon became targets of a systematic campaign that included a drive-by
shooting, three firebombings, vandalization of IHR employee-owned
automobiles, slashings of 22 tires of employee automobiles,
JDL-organized demonstrations outside the IHR office, and numerous
telephone threats during office hours and at night to IHR employees at
home. So intense did the harassment become that the family of one IHR
employee was forced to move. (note 77)
During the course of a JDL demonstration in front of the IHR office on
March 19, 1981, Mordechai Levy and other JDL protesters attacked the
car of the landlord's agent, who had arrived to ensure security. While
shouting threats, Levy smashed the right front passenger window of the
man's car as he drove off. (note 78)
A few weeks later, on April 5, 1981, JDL hoodlums staged another
violent demonstration outside the IHR office, during which an IHR
employee was thrown to the ground and beaten.
In the early morning hours of June 25, 1981, came the first
firebombing attack against the IHR office. Fortunately, the arson
device-similar to a "Molotov cocktail"-caused only minor damage. A man
claiming to represent the "Jewish Defenders" announced responsibility
for the attack in phone calls to news agencies. (note 79)
The second arson attack against the IHR office came on April 25, 1982,
in which a copy machine, a few pieces of furniture and some records
were damaged. In a telephone message to a local news agency, a group
calling itself "the Jewish Defenders" claimed responsibility. (note
80)
In an attack on September 5, 1982, the IHR office was riddled with
gunfire, demolishing two windows and damaging the front door.
Additionally, a small arson device caused some slight damage to the
front of the office. Later that day, as throughout the week, came a
barrage of murder-threatening telephone calls. Although the caller's
voice was identified as that of Mordechai Levy, typically, no one was
arrested in the case. (note 81)
Fire-Bombing Arson Attack
This terror campaign culminated in a devastating arson attack on the
Institute's offices and warehouse in Torrance on July 4, 1984 -- the
209th anniversary of American independence. Damage in the attack,
carried out in the early morning hours of the 4th, was estimated at
$400,000. (note 82)
In a special edition of the IHR Newsletter (August 1984), IHR Director
J. Marcellus summed up:
As a physical entity, the Institute for Historical Review has
virtually ceased to exist. Ninety percent of our book and tape
inventory-the largest collection of revisionist historical literature
to be found anywhere-has been wiped out. Every last piece of office
equipment and machinery-including desks, chairs, files and shelves-lay
in charred heaps of useless, twisted scrap. Manuscripts, documents,
artwork, galleys and film negatives-products of more than six long
years of a tough, dedicated effort to bring suppressed historical data
to people the world over-no longer exist. Tens of thousands of
books...estimated at over $300,000 in value, are gone...More than
2,500 square feet of space that was once the world's most
controversial publisher lies blackened in chaos and total ruin.
Two days later, JDL leader Irv Rubin showed up at the site of the
gutted IHR offices to publicly praise the arson attack. The JDL, he
declared, "wholeheartedly applauds the recent devastation of the
offices of the Institute for Historical Review." Denying any personal
responsibility himself, Rubin said that the criminal attack had been
carried out by a former JDL activist named Larry Winston (Joel Cohen).
"I believe, with all my heart, that he [Winston/Cohen] had something
to do with this" arson, Rubin declared. (note 83)
Although no one was ever arrested in connection with the 1984
firebombing, the sophisticated nature of the attack suggests that it
could have been the work of trained operatives of a foreign
governmental agency.
Apart from local news coverage, American newspapers and television
reported almost nothing about this act of criminal "book burning."
This skewed media treatment moved noted journalist Alexander Cockburn
to observe (in the pages of the liberal weekly The Nation): (note 84)
The outfit in the United States that does publish material belittling
generally accepted accounts of the Nazi extermination of the Jews is
called the Institute for Historical Review. I don't recall much fuss
when its offices in Torrance, California, were firebombed in July
1984. Perhaps this is what Mailer meant by "sophistication" in
handling such heterodox opinion.
At the same time, though, a few prominent voices courageously spoke
out against the attack. American historian John Toland-who received
the Pulitzer prize for general non-fiction in 1971 for his book The
Rising Sun -- wrote to the IHR: (note 85)
When I learned of the torching of the office-warehouse of the
Institute for Historical Review, I was shocked. And when I heard no
condemnation of this act of terrorism on television and read no
protests in the editorial pages of our leading newspapers or from the
halls of Academe, I was dismayed and incensed...I call on all true
believers in democracy to join me in public denunciation of the recent
burning of books in Torrance, California.
British historian David Irving, author of numerous acclaimed,
best-selling works of history, declared: "I was deeply shocked to hear
of the fire-bomb attack on your premises."
JDL Harassment of IHR Conference
In mid-February 1989, Jewish Defense League intimidation brought on
the cancellation of a three-day Institute for Historical Review
conference at two hotel sites in southern California.
Arrangements had been made months in advance to hold the Ninth IHR
Conference at the Red Lion Inn hotel in Costa Mesa. Several days
before it was to begin, the hotel received the first of a barrage of
telephone threats warning that if it permitted the IHR gathering to
take place as scheduled, there would be large, disruptive
demonstrations in front of the hotel. It didn't take many such threats
to persuade general manager Russell Cox to cave in to the Zionist
group, and to cancel the hotel's contract with the IHR. Cox then added
insult to injury by permitting JDL chief Rubin to hold a "news
conference" in the hotel lobby.
Arrangements were then hastily made to relocate the IHR gathering to a
nearby Holiday Inn hotel. However, just hours before it was to
commence- and as attendees were arriving-the Holiday Inn likewise
cancelled out, bowing to JDL threats similar to those made against the
Red Lion Inn.
At this point, and with help from former US Congressman John Schmitz,
IHR Director J. Marcellus made emergency arrangements with Joe
Bischof, proprietor of the "Old World Village" shopping center in
Huntington Beach, to hold the IHR Conference there. Bischof refused to
bow to JDL intimidation, including a demonstration at the site by a
handful of sorry-looking placard-waving JDLers led by Rubin, who
shouted insults at passersby. In spite of the disruption, and some
inconvenience for attendees, the Ninth IHR Conference proved one of
the most successful and high-spirited ever. (note 86)
JDL Thugs Attack Young Jewish Revisionist
On January 22, 1992, revisionist activist David Cole was attacked by
JDL thugs at a meeting held at the University of California at Los
Angeles. Before the meeting began, JDL leader Rubin first tried to
push the youthful Cole down a flight of stairs. JDL hoodlums also
harassed and pushed around meeting organizer Robert Morrissey. After
the meeting commenced, JDL punks tried to shout down the speakers, and
then threw food at Cole. Finally, a JDL thug assaulted Cole-who is
Jewish-hitting him in the face and bloodying his nose. (note 87)
The tumult was recorded on videotape by a camera crew of the CBS
television news program "48 Hours," as well as by news crews of two
local Los Angeles television stations. Neither of the two local
stations mentioned a word of the incident in their nightly news
broadcasts. Similarly, CBS officials decided not to air even a second
of this outburst, not even in a segment about Holocaust revisionism
that was part of the CBS television network's hour-long
magazine-format program "48 Hours" broadcast of February 26, 1992.
Network officials apparently decided that scenes of Zionist hoodlums
beating a young Jewish revisionist would not "fit" with the image of
revisionism that CBS wanted to project to its many viewers. (note 88)
Violence in Europe
The Murder of François Duprat
In France, François Duprat-a gifted young historian, educator, and
prolific writer-was murdered in 1978, thereby becoming the first
person to be killed because of his support for Holocaust revisionism.
Duprat had publicized the writings of former concentration camp inmate
Paul Rassinier, distributed a booklet, Did Six Million Really Die?,
and had published a revisionist article of his own, "The Mystery of
the Gas Chambers." (note 89)
As a result of such activism, the 38-year-old teacher was assassinated
on March 18, 1978, when the car he was driving was blown up in a bomb
blast. His wife, who was with him, lost the use of her legs in the
attack. A Jewish "Remembrance Commando" and a "Jewish Revolutionary
Group" promptly claimed responsibility for the murder. (note 90) So
sophisticated was the attack that it is difficult to believe that no
government agency was involved.
The Israel Connection
It is no secret that Israel provides training and weapons for local
"Jewish defense groups" in the United States and many other countries.
Victor Ostrovsky, a former intelligence case officer of the Mossad,
Israel's spy and secret service agency, confirms this connection in
his much-discussed book, By Way of Deception. (note 91) One department
of the Mossad, writes Ostrovsky, is the Tsafririm, which is
responsible for setting up Jewish defense groups, called "frames," or
misgerot, all over the world, now including some parts of the United
States, where anti-Semitism is regarded as a threat ... The main job
is to help the leaders of Jewish communities outside Israel plan for
their own security. Part of this is done through the hets va-keshet,
or "bow and arrow," Israel's paramilitary youth brigades.
... Often youths from other countries are brought over [to Israel] to
spend the summer learning about security, picking up such skills as
completing obstacle courses, pitching tents, and learning how to use a
sniper rifle and Uzi assault rifle. Still others learn upgraded
security skills, such as how to build a slick, for hiding weapons or
documents, when and how to do security checks, as well as fundamentals
of investigation and intelligence gathering.
Israel provides weapons for the many "Jewish defense groups," confirms
Ostrovsky, indirectly through known arms dealers.
Tagar/Betar
In Europe the most important Zionist terrorist group is Tagar, the
youth (or "student") branch of the radical Zionist movement Betar. The
Tagar/Betar group has carried out numerous criminal attacks against
"enemies," including Holocaust revisionists. Headquartered in Paris,
Tagar/Betar has close ties with the Israeli government, and
particularly with the political party of Begin and Shamir. Tagar is
reportedly controlled by Israel's covert operations agency, the
Mossad. (note 92)
Tagar activists have often boasted of their determination to "strike"
against anyone who "denies the Holocaust." Tagar admitted
responsibility for a physical assault against French revisionist
historian Olivier Mathieu during a television interview in February
1990. Three months later, Tagar thugs sacked the "Ogmios" bookstore in
Paris (which carried revisionist titles).
Tagar/Betar activists receive combat training along military lines
from Israeli army officers. Tagar members wear paramilitary blue
uniforms with white ties (the Zionist colors). Tagar/Betar has
operated in Europe with the knowledge and approval of high French
officials such as Prime Minister Laurent Fabius (who is Jewish). In
more than one Tagar/Betar attack against opponents, French police have
passively stood by. (note 93)
Tagar activists have operated in France under other names, including
"Jewish Defense Organization" and "Jewish Combat Organization."
Private para-military groups are strictly forbidden in France, except
Jewish ones. Between June 1976 and April 1991, such Jewish "militias"
have carried out 50 attacks. In effect, Jewish terrorists in Europe
can attack their "enemies" with impunity. (note 94)
Tagar has also been active in the United States. In February 1992, the
"Tagar Student Zionist Organization at the Ohio State University" in
Columbus organized a protest meeting against Holocaust revisionism.
The group distributed a leaflet-which, typically, contained factual
falsehoods-specifically attacking revisionist activist Bradley Smith.
(note 95)
Robert Faurisson
Dr. Robert Faurisson-Europe's most prominent Holocaust revisionist
(and a member of the Editorial Advisory Committee of the IHR's Journal
of Historical Review) -- was severely injured in a nearly fatal attack
on September 16, 1989. (note 96)
After spraying a stinging gas into his face, temporarily blinding him,
three assailants punched him to the ground and then repeatedly kicked
him in the face and chest. The 60-year-old scholar, who had been out
walking his poodle in a park in his home town of Vichy, suffered a
broken jaw and severe head injuries. Physicians operated for four and
a half hours to repair his jaw and treat a broken rib and badly
swollen face.
A group calling itself "The Sons of the Memory of the Jews" claimed
responsibility for the savage attack. In a statement, the group
threatened:
"Professor Faurisson is the first, but will not be the last. Let those
who deny the Shoah [Holocaust] beware." (note 97) While French police
officially would acknowledge only that "three young Jewish activists
from Paris" had carried out the assault, the attackers are strongly
suspected to have been with the Tagar/Betar organization. (note 98)
Prominent individuals and organizations in France, along with the
country's most influential daily newspaper, Le Monde, condemned the
attack. However, French-Jewish "Nazi hunter" Serge Klarsfeld sought to
excuse or justify the crime. "Someone who has provoked the Jewish
community for years should expect this sort of thing," he said. "One
cannot insult the memory of the victims without inviting the
consequences." (note 99)
While the September 1989 attack against Faurisson was the most
vicious, it was neither the first nor the last. Between November 1978
and May 1993, he was attacked on ten separate occasions. (note 100)
Other Terrorist Incidents in Europe
On November 5, 1980, an arson attack destroyed the office, warehouse
and printing plant in Sussex, southern England, of the firm that
prints Did Six Million Really Die? and other revisionist publications
of the Historical Review Press. Damage was estimated at 50,000 pounds.
A leftist journalist, Manny Carpel, was found guilty of the crime, and
sentenced to two and a half years imprisonment. (He served only a
little more than a year.) In January 1984, in Cologne, Germany,
Professor Hermann Greive, a non-Jewish authority on Jewish religious
writings, was shot to death by a member of Kahane's Kach group. The
murder was reportedly carried out in keeping with a Jewish scriptural
injunction that demands death for non-Jews who "pry" into Jewish
religious writings. (note 101)
On February 10, 1988, terrorists set fire to the automobile of German
historian Ernst Nolte while it was parked at the Free University in
Berlin, where he was a professor. An anonymous letter, signed with a
five-pointed star, declared: "We attack Nolte because he is one of
those who personally represents the continuity of fascism" and as
co-founder of a "reactionary" group called the "Academic Freedom
League." Nolte had been widely criticized for his moderately
revisionist views of Second World War history. (note 102)
On April 20, 1991, Betar/Tagar thugs carried out a violent attack
against several persons who were to attend a conference in Paris on
the French writer Marc Augier. (Under the pen name of Saint-Loup,
Augier wrote a series of books on the French "Legion of Volunteers,"
which fought on the eastern front during the Second World War.) Three
or four of the victims were hospitalized. One, a 67-year-old woman,
was in a coma for two months. Two Tagar members were arrested in
connection with the attack, but two and a half years later they had
still not been brought to trial. (note 103) A bookstore in Paris had
to be shut down for good in 1992 after repeated violent attacks by
Jewish militants. The bookstore was targeted because it sold
revisionist titles and was operated by revisionist publisher Pierre
Guillaume.
On October 19, 1992, a team of about 30 Betar activists shoved and
insulted pedestrians, smashed automobiles, and threw tear gas at
police in the central plaza of the German city of Rostock. The group
was led by the "Nazi-hunting" (and anti-revisionist) husband-wife team
of Serge and Beate Klarsfeld. The Betar activists, some of them
carrying Israeli flags, insulted passersby with shouts of "Dirty
Germans! Dirty Nazis!". (note 104) In December 1992, the chief of the
Jewish Defense League in Israel announced that he was sending teams of
killers to Germany to murder "neo-Nazis." Every German who cries "Heil
Hitler," or otherwise identifies himself as a Nazi, declared
33-year-old Rabbi Baruch Ben-Joseph (Baruch Green), is a target for
death. (note 105) Prominent German far-right political figures are not
the only persons on the Israel JDL's hit list, confided one JDL
member: "Persons behind the scenes are often more important, such as
the professor who denies or whitewashes the Holocaust in a book."
(note 106)
Conclusion
As this report shows, non-governmental Zionist terrorism has been a
problem for more than twenty years. It remains a serious problem
today.
Espousing Jewish supremacy, the Zionist terrornetwork operates
internationally, linking Israel, Europe and the United States. In
addition to the suffering and destruction resulting directly from its
many crimes, the network's campaign of bigotry fosters a dangerous
climate of hate and intolerance. Through intimidation, threat and
violence, Jewish-Zionist terrorists have succeeded in silencing
numerous voices. Many others have never spoken up out of fear that
they might likewise become victims.
Particularly alarming is the important support provided to these
criminal groups by the government of Israel. This official
collaboration poses a threat not only to the freedom and security of
individuals in many countries, but to the very freedom and sovereignty
of nations.
At the same time, though, the danger should not be exaggerated.
Zionist power is formidable but not limitless.
For one thing, Jewish militants are often so inept and mutually
suspicious that they squander much of their energy on attacks against
each other. (note 107)
Moreover, the number of individuals and organizations that Zionist
militants perceive as "anti-Semitic enemies" has increased so
dramatically in recent years that any one person or group is less
likely to be singled out for attack. (Even the much-feared
"anti-Semite" epithet has lost much of its impact. In 1991, an Israeli
government cabinet minister denounced President George Bush as
"anti-Semitic" because he wasn't acting quickly enough in approving a
$10 billion loan guarantee to Israel.)"
No User
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
Frank Arthur
"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> ots.com/jews.html
World WarII remembered/2
The Germans used the pretext of "Jews were responsible for Germany
losing WW I".
In their effort, under Hitler, they succeeding in bombing, killing,
invading or destroying cities in
England,Holland,Belgium,France,Greece,Hungary,Poland,Romania,Czechoslovakia,Denmark,Norway,Yugoslavia
and Russia among others.
63 years after the defeat of Germany's Hitler and the end of Nazism
certain sadistic and mentally deformed people who missed Hitler and
Nazism
would like to return to their imaginary "days of glory".
ßDoüg±Ç
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/v/ffi_gallery/naziism/
"Frank Arthur" <A...@Arthurian.com> wrote in message
news:h6jsk.15839$kh2....@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
*us*
*us*
and has never been on the same side as the USA.
*us*
repo
> Pictures of the REAL nazis of the 21st century: the islamonazis:
>
> http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/v/ffi_gallery/naziism/
Islamic Terror attacks in only the past two months;
fresh blood seems to be the agenda for Islam.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/msg/c87fee33ec0e6f17
*us*
Topaz
By Mark Weber
Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of deception
and outright lies in getting the United States to intervene in the
Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in
December 1941. Roosevelt's aid to Britain and the Soviet Union in
violation of American neutrality and international law, his acts of
war against Germany in the Atlantic in an effort to provoke a German
declaration of war against the United States, his authorization of a
vast "dirty tricks" campaign against U.S. citizens by British
intelligence agents in violation of the Constitution, and his
provocations and ultimatums against Japan which brought on the attack
against Pearl Harbor-all this is extensively documented and reasonably
well known.[1]
Not so well known is the story of Roosevelt's enormous responsibility
for the outbreak of the Second World War itself. This essay focuses on
Roosevelt's secret campaign to provoke war in Europe prior to the
outbreak of hostilities in September 1939. It deals particularly with
his efforts to pressure Britain, France and Poland into war against
Germany in 1938 and 1939.
Franklin Roosevelt not only criminally involved America in a war which
had already engulfed Europe. He bears a grave responsibility before
history for the outbreak of the most destructive war of all time.
This paper relies heavily on a little-known collection of secret
Polish documents which fell into German hands when Warsaw was captured
in September 1939.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html
These documents clearly establish Roosevelt's crucial role in bringing
on the Second World War.
Poland had refused to even negotiate over self-determination for the
German city of Danzig and the ethnic German minority in the so-called
Polish Corridor. Hitler felt compelled to resort to arms when he did
in response to a growing Polish campaign of terror and dispossession
against the one and a half million ethnic Germans under Polish rule.
In my view, if ever a military action was justified, it was the German
campaign against Poland in 1939.
Poland's headstrong refusal to negotiate was made possible because of
a fateful blank check guarantee of military backing from Britain-a
pledge that ultimately proved completely worthless to the hapless
Poles. Considering the lightning swiftness of the victorious German
campaign, it is difficult to realize today that the Polish government
did not at all fear war with Germany. Poland's leaders foolishly
believed that German might was only an illusion. They were convinced
that their troops would occupy Berlin itself within a few weeks and
add further German territories to an enlarged Polish state. It is also
important to keep in mind that the purely localized conflict between
Germany and Poland was only transformed into a Europe-wide
conflagration by the British and French declarations of war against
Germany.
On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy
Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role
in making American foreign policy:
The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State
Department is becoming ever more powerful ...
... The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis
which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general
catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent.
in their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created
real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and
communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred
against Nazism.
This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by
every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans
are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which
wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean
of blood.
In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly
come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is
inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of
propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation
and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is
growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans
and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be
subdued by the 'democratic world.'
Ambassador Potocki's report from Washington of 9 January 1939 dealt in
large part with President Roosevelt's annual address to Congress:
President Roosevelt acts on the assumption that the dictatorial
governments, above all Germany and Japan, only understand a policy of
force. Therefore he has decided to react to any future blows by
matching them. This has been demonstrated by the most recent measures
of the United States.
The American public is subject to an ever more alarming propaganda
which is under Jewish influence and continuously conjures up the
specter of the danger of war. Because of this the Americans have
strongly altered their views on foreign policy problems, in comparison
with last year.
Of all the documents in this collection, the most revealing is
probably the secret report by Ambassador Potocki of 12 January 1939
which dealt with the domestic situation in the United States. This
report is given here in full:
The feeling now prevailing in the United States is marked by a growing
hatred of Fascism and, above all, of Chancellor Hitler and everything
connected with Nazism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews
who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical
press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents
Germany as black as possible-above all religious persecution and
concentration camps are exploited-this propaganda is nevertheless
extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and
knows nothing of the situation in Europe...
It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign
which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia
is almost completely excluded. If mentioned at all, it is only in a
friendly manner and things are presented in such a way as if Soviet
Russia were working with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the
clever propaganda the sympathy of the American public is completely on
the side of Red Spain.
Besides this propaganda, a war psychosis is being artificially
created. The American people are told that peace in Europe is hanging
only by a thread and that war is unavoidable. At the same time the
American people are unequivocally told that in case of a world war,
America must also take an active part in order to defend the slogans
of freedom and democracy in the world.
These groups of people who occupy the highest positions in the
American government and want to pose as representatives of 'true
Americanism' and 'defenders of democracy' are, in the last analysis,
connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.
For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the
interests of its race, to portray the President of the United States
as the 'idealist' champion on human rights was a very clever move. In
this manner they have created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and
hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile
camps. The entire issue is worked out in a masterly manner. Roosevelt
has been given the foundation for activating American foreign policy,
and simultaneously has been procuring enormous military stocks for the
coming war, for which the Jews are striving very consciously. With
regard to domestic policy, it is very convenient to divert public
attention from anti-Semitism, which is constantly growing in the
United States, by talking about the necessity of defending religion
and individual liberty against the onslaught of Fascism.
On 16 January 1939, Polish Ambassador Potocki reported to the Warsaw
Foreign Ministry on another lengthy conversation he had with
Roosevelt's personal envoy, William Bullitt
1. The vitalizing of foreign policy under the leadership of President
Roosevelt, who severely and unambiguously condemns totalitarian
countries.
2. United States preparations for war on sea, land and air will be
carried out at an accelerated pace and will consume the colossal sum
of 1.25 billion dollars.
3. It is the decided opinion of the President that France and Britain
must put an end to any sort of compromise with the totalitarian
countries. They must not get into any discussions aiming at any kind
of territorial changes.
4. They have the moral assurance that the United States will abandon
the policy of isolation and be prepared to intervene actively on the
side of Britain and France in case of war. America is ready to place
its whole wealth of money and raw materials at their disposal.
The Polish Ambassador to Paris, Juliusz (Jules) Lukasiewicz, sent a
top secret report to the Foreign Ministry in Warsaw at the beginning
of February 1939 which outlined U.S. policy towards Europe as
explained to him by William Bullitt:
A week ago, the Ambassador of the United States, William Bullitt
returned to Paris after a three months' leave in America. Meanwhile, I
have had two conversations with him which enable me to inform you of
his views regarding the European situation and to give a survey of
Washington's policy.
The international situation is regarded by official circles as
extremely serious and in constant danger of armed conflict. Those in
authority are of the opinion that if war should break out between
Britain and France on the one hand, and Germany and Italy on the
other, and should Britain and France be defeated, the Germans would
endanger the real interests of the United States on the American
continent. For this reason, one can foresee right from the beginning
the participation of the United States in the war on the side of
France and Britain, naturally some time after the outbreak of the war.
As Ambassador Bullitt expressed it: 'Should war break out we shall
certainly not take part in it at the beginning, but we shall finish
it.'
On 7 March 1939, Ambassador Potocki sent a remarkably lucid and
perceptive report on Roosevelt's foreign policy to his government in
Warsaw. This document was first made public when leading German
newspapers published it in German translation, along with a facsimile
reproduction of the first page of the Polish original, in their
editions of 28 October 1940. The main National Socialist party
newspaper, the Voelkischer Beobachter, published the Ambassador's
report with this observation:
The document itself needs no commentary. We do not know, and it does
not concern us, whether the internal American situation as reported by
the Polish diplomat is correct in every detail. That must be decided
by the American people alone. But in the interest of historical truth
it is important for us to show that the warmongering activities of
American diplomacy, especially in Europe, are once again revealed and
proven by this document. It still remains a secret just who, and for
what motives, have driven American diplomacy to this course. In any
case, the results have been disastrous for both Europe and America.
Europe was plunged into war and America has brought upon itself the
hostility of great nations which normally have no differences with the
American people and, indeed, have not been in conflict but have lived
for generations as friends and want to remain so...
While the Polish documents alone are conclusive proof of Roosevelt's
treacherous campaign to bring about world war, it is fortunate for
posterity that a substantial body of irrefutable complementary
evidence exists which confirms the conspiracy recorded in the
dispatches to Warsaw...
On 19 September 1938 -- that is, a year before the outbreak of war in
Europe-Roosevelt called Lindsay to a very secret meeting at the White
House. At the beginning of their long conversation, according to
Lindsay's confidential dispatch to London, Roosevelt "emphasized the
necessity of absolute secrecy. Nobody must know I had seen him and he
himself would tell nobody of the interview. I gathered not even the
State Department." The two discussed some secondary matters before
Roosevelt got to the main point of the conference. "This is the very
secret part of his communication and it must not be known to anyone
that he has even breathed a suggestion." The President told the
Ambassador that if news of the conversation was ever made public, it
could mean his impeachment. And no wonder. What Roosevelt proposed was
a cynically brazen but harebrained scheme to violate the U.S.
Constitution and dupe the American people.
The President said that if Britain and France "would find themselves
forced to war" against Germany, the United States would ultimately
also join. But this would require some clever maneuvering. Britain and
France should impose a total blockade against Germany without actually
declaring war and force other states (including neutrals) to abide by
it. This would certainly provoke some kind of German military
response, but it would also free Britain and France from having to
actually declare war. For propaganda purposes, the "blockade must be
based on loftiest humanitarian grounds and on the desire to wage
hostilities with minimum of suffering and the least possible loss of
life and property, and yet bring the enemy to his knees." Roosevelt
conceded that this would involve aerial bombardment, but "bombing from
the air was not the method of hostilities which caused really great
loss of life."
The important point was to "call it defensive measures or anything
plausible but avoid actual declaration of war." That way, Roosevelt
believed he could talk the American people into supporting war against
Germany, including shipments of weapons to Britain and France, by
insisting that the United States was still technically neutral in a
non-declared conflict. "This method of conducting war by blockade
would in his [Roosevelt's] opinion meet with approval of the United
States if its humanitarian purpose were strongly emphasized," Lindsay
reported.[19]
The American Ambassador to Italy, William Phillips, admitted in his
postwar memoirs that the Roosevelt administration was already
committed to going to war on the side of Britain and France in late
1938. "On this and many other occasions," Phillips wrote, "I would
like to have told him [Count Ciano, the Italian Foreign Minister]
frankly that in the event of a European war, the United States would
undoubtedly be involved on the side of the Allies. But in view of my
official position, I could not properly make such a statement without
instructions from Washington, and these I never received."[20]
The fateful British pledge to Poland of 31 March 1939 to go to war
against Germany in case of a Polish-German conflict would not have
been made without strong pressure from the White House
In their nationally syndicated column of 14 April 1939, the usually
very well informed Washington journalists Drew Pearson and Robert S.
Allen reported that on 16 March 1939 Roosevelt had "sent a virtual
ultimatum to Chamberlain" demanding that henceforth the British
government strongly oppose Germany. According to Pearson and Allen,
who completely supported Roosevelt's move, "the President warned that
Britain could expect no more support, moral or material through the
sale of airplanes, if the Munich policy continued."[22] Chamberlain
gave in and the next day, 17 March, ended Britain's policy of
cooperation with Germany in a speech at Birmingham bitterly denouncing
Hitler. Two weeks later the British government formally pledged itself
to war in case of German-Polish hostilities.
In a confidential telegram to Washington dated 9 April 1939, Bullitt
reported from Paris on another conversation with Ambassador
Lukasiewicz. He had told the Polish envoy that although U.S. law
prohibited direct financial aid to Poland, it might be possible to
circumvent its provisions. The Roosevelt administration might be able
to supply war planes to Poland indirectly through Britain. "The Polish
Ambassador asked me if it might not be possible for Poland to obtain
financial help and aeroplanes from the United States. I replied that I
believed the Johnson Act would forbid any loans from the United States
to Poland but added that it might be possible for England to purchase
planes for cash in the United States and turn them over to
Poland."[24]
On 25 April 1939, four months before the outbreak of war, Bullitt
called American newspaper columnist Karl von Wiegand, chief European
correspondent of the International News Service, to the U.S. embassy
in Paris and told him: "War in Europe has been decided upon. Poland
has the assurance of the support of Britain and France, and will yield
to no demands from Germany. America will be in the war soon after
Britain and France enter it."[25]
In a lengthy secret conversation at Hyde Park on 28 May 1939,
Roosevelt assured the former President of Czechoslovakia, Dr. Edvard
Benes, that America would actively intervene on the side of Britain
and France in the anticipated European war.[26]
In June 1939, Roosevelt secretly proposed to the British that the
United States should establish "a patrol over the waters of the
Western Atlantic with a view to denying them to the German Navy in the
event of war." The British Foreign Office record of this offer noted
that "although the proposal was vague and woolly and open to certain
objections, we assented informally as the patrol was to be operated in
our interests."[27]
Many years after the war, Georges Bonnet, the French Foreign Minister
in 1939, confirmed Bullitt's role as Roosevelt's deputy in pushing his
country into war. In a letter to Hamilton Fish dated 26 March 1971,
Bonnet wrote: "One thing is certain is that Bullitt in 1939 did
everything he could to make France enter the war."[28] An important
confirmation of the crucial role of Roosevelt and the Jews in pushing
Britain into war comes from the diary of James V. Forrestal, the first
U.S. Secretary of Defense. In his entry for 27 December 1945, he
wrote:
Played golf today with [former Ambassador] Joe Kennedy. I asked him
about his conversations with Roosevelt and [British Prime Minister]
Neville Chamberlain from 1938 on. He said Chamberlain's position in
1938 was that England had nothing with which to fight and that she
could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy's view: That Hitler
would have fought Russia without any later conflict with England if it
had not been for [William] Bullitt's urging on Roosevelt in the summer
of 1939 that the Germans must be faced down about Poland; neither the
French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of war if it had
not been for the constant needling from Washington. Bullitt, he said,
kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans wouldn't fight; Kennedy that
they would, and that they would overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he says,
stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the
war. In his telephone conversations with Roosevelt in the summer of
1939, the President kept telling him to put some iron up Chamberlain's
backside.[29]
"In the West," the Ambassador told Szembek, "there are all kinds of
elements openly pushing for war: the Jews, the super-capitalists, the
arms dealers. Today they are all ready for a great business, because
they have found a place which can be set on fire: Danzig; and a nation
that is ready to fight: Poland. They want to do business on our backs.
They are indifferent to the destruction of our country. Indeed, since
everything will have to be rebuilt later on, they can profit from that
as well."[30]
On 24 August 1939, just a week before the outbreak of hostilities,
Chamberlain's closest advisor, Sir Horace Wilson, went to Ambassador
Kennedy with an urgent appeal from the British Prime Minister for
President Roosevelt. Regretting that Britain had unequivocally
obligated itself in March to Poland in case of war, Chamberlain now
turned in despair to Roosevelt as a last hope for peace. He wanted the
American President to "put pressure on the Poles" to change course at
this late hour and open negotiations with Germany. By telephone
Kennedy told the State Department that the British "felt that they
could not, given their obligations, do anything of this sort but that
we could." Presented with this extraordinary opportunity to possibly
save the peace of Europe, Roosevelt rejected Chamberlain's desperate
plea out of hand. At that, Kennedy reported, the Prime Minister lost
all hope. "The futility of it all," Chamberlain had told Kennedy, "is
the thing that is frightful. After all, we cannot save the Poles. We
can merely carry on a war of revenge that will mean the destruction of
all Europe."[31]
But Roosevelt rejected out of hand this chance to save the peace of
Europe. To a close political crony, he called Kennedy's plea "the
silliest message to me that I have ever received." He complained to
Henry Morgenthau that his London Ambassador was nothing but a pain in
the neck: "Joe has been an appeaser and will always be an appeaser ...
If Germany and Italy made a good peace offer tomorrow, Joe would start
working on the King and his friend the Queen and from there on down to
get everybody to accept it."[33]
Infuriated at Kennedy's stubborn efforts to restore peace in Europe or
at least limit the conflict that had broken out, Roosevelt instructed
his Ambassador with a "personal" and "strictly confidential" telegram
on 11 September 1939 that any American peace effort was totally out of
the question. The Roosevelt government, it declared, "sees no
opportunity nor occasion for any peace move to be initiated by the
President of the United States. The people [sic] of the United States
would not support any move for peace initiated by this Government that
would consolidate or make possible a survival of a regime of force and
aggression."[34]
In the months before armed conflict broke out in Europe, perhaps the
most vigorous and prophetic American voice of warning against
President Roosevelt's campaign to incite war was that of Hamilton
Fish, a leading Republican congressman from New York. In a series of
hard-hitting radio speeches, Fish rallied considerable public opinion
against Roosevelt's deceptive war policy. Here are only a few excerpts
from some of those addresses.[35]
On 6 January 1939, Fish told a nationwide radio audience:
The inflammatory and provocative message of the President to Congress
and the world [given two days before] has unnecessarily alarmed the
American people and created, together with a barrage of propaganda
emanating from high New Deal officials, a war hysteria, dangerous to
the peace of America and the world. The only logical conclusion to
such speeches is another war fought overseas by American soldiers.
All the totalitarian nations referred to by President Roosevelt ...
haven't the faintest thought of making war on us or invading Latin
America.
I do not propose to mince words on such an issue, affecting the life,
liberty and happiness of our people. The time has come to call a halt
to the warmongers of the New Deal, backed by war profiteers,
Communists, and hysterical internationalists, who want us to
quarantine the world with American blood and money.
He [Roosevelt] evidently desires to whip up a frenzy of hate and war
psychosis as a red herring to take the minds of our people off their
own unsolved domestic problems. He visualizes hobgoblins and creates
in the public mind a fear of foreign invasions that exists only in his
own imagination.
On 5 March, Fish spoke to the country over the Columbia radio network:
The people of France and Great Britain want peace but our warmongers
are constantly inciting them to disregard the Munich Pact and resort
to the arbitrament of arms. If only we would stop meddling in foreign
lands the old nations of Europe would compose their own quarrels by
arbitration and the processes of peace, but apparently we won't let
them.
Fish addressed the listeners of the National Broadcasting Company
network on 5 April with these words:
The youth of America are again being prepared for another blood bath
in Europe in order to make the world safe for democracy.
If Hitler and the Nazi government regain Memel or Danzig, taken away
from Germany by the Versailles Treaty, and where the population is 90
percent German, why is it necessary to issue threats and denunciations
and incite our people to war? I would not sacrifice the life of one
American soldier for a half dozen Memels or Danzigs. We repudiated the
Versailles Treaty because it was based on greed and hatred, and as
long as its inequalities and injustices exist there are bound to be
wars of liberation.
The sooner certain provisions of the Versailles Treaty are scrapped
the better for the peace of the world.
I believe that if the areas that are distinctly German in population
are restored to Germany, except Alsace-Lorraine and the Tyrol, there
will be no war in western Europe. There may be a war between the Nazis
and the Communists, but if there is that is not our war or that of
Great Britain or France or any of the democracies.
New Deal spokesmen have stirred up war hysteria into a veritable
frenzy. The New Deal propaganda machine is working overtime to prepare
the minds of our people for war, who are already suffering from a bad
case of war jitters.
President Roosevelt is the number one warmonger in America, and is
largely responsible for the fear that pervades the Nation which has
given the stock market and the American people a bad case of the
jitters.
I accuse the administration of instigating war propaganda and hysteria
to cover up the failure and collapse of the New Deal policies, with 12
million unemployed and business confidence destroyed.
I believe we have far more to fear from our enemies from within than
we have from without. All the Communists are united in urging us to go
to war against Germany and Japan for the benefit of Soviet Russia.
Great Britain still expects every American to do her duty, by
preserving the British Empire and her colonies. The war profiteers,
munitions makers and international bankers are all set up for our
participation in a new world war.
On 21 April, Fish again spoke to the country over nationwide radio:
It is the duty of all those Americans who desire to keep out of
foreign entanglements and the rotten mess and war madness of Europe
and Asia to openly expose the war hysteria and propaganda that is
impelling us to armed conflict.
What we need in America is a stop war crusade, before we are forced
into a foreign war by internationalists and interventionists at
Washington, who seem to be more interested in solving world problems
rather than our own.
In his radio address of 26 May, Fish stated:
He [Roosevelt] should remember that the Congress has the sole power to
declare war and formulate the foreign policies of the United States.
The President has no such constitutional power. He is merely the
official organ to carry out the policies determined by the Congress.
Without knowing even who the combatants will be, we are informed
almost daily by the internationalists and interventionists in America
that we must participate in the next world war.
On 8 July 1939, Fish declared over the National Broadcasting Company
radio network:
If we must go to war, let it be in defense of America, but not in
defense of the munitions makers, war profiteers, Communists, to cover
up the failures of the New Deal, or to provide an alibi for a third
term.
It is well for all nations to know that we do not propose to go to war
over Danzig, power politics, foreign colonies, or the imperialistic
wars of Europe or anywhere in the world.
President Roosevelt could have done little to incite war in Europe
without help from powerful allies. Behind him stood the self-serving
international financial and Jewish interests bent on the destruction
of Germany. The principal organization which drummed up public support
for U.S. involvement in the European war prior to the Pearl Harbor
attack was the cleverly named "Committee to Defend America by Aiding
the Allies." President Roosevelt himself initiated its founding, and
top administration officials consulted frequently with Committee
leaders.[36]
Although headed for a time by an elderly small-town Kansas newspaper
publisher, William Allen White, the Committee was actually organized
by powerful financial interests which stood to profit tremendously
from loans to embattled Britain and from shrewd investments in giant
war industries in the United States.
At the end of 1940, West Virginia Senator Rush D. Holt issued a
detailed examination of the Committee which exposed the base interests
behind the idealistic-sounding slogans:
The Committee has powerful connections with banks, insurance
companies, financial investing firms, and industrial concerns. These
in turn exert influence on college presidents and professors, as well
as on newspapers, radio and other means of communication. One of the
powerful influences used by the group is the '400' and social set. The
story is a sordid picture of betrayal of public interest.
The powerful J.P. Morgan interest with its holdings in the British
Empire helped plan the organization and donated its first expense
money.
Some of the important figures active in the Committee were revealed by
Holt: Frederic R. Coudert, a paid war propagandist for the British
government in the U.S. during the First World War; Robert S. Allen of
the Pearson and Allen syndicated column; Henry R. Luce, the
influential publisher of Time, Life, and Fortune magazines; Fiorella
LaGuardia, the fiery half-Jewish Mayor of Now York City; Herbert
Lehman, the Jewish Governor of New York with important financial
holdings in war industries; and Frank Altschul, an officer in the
Jewish investment firm of Lazard Freres with extensive holdings in
munitions and military supply companies.
If the Committee succeeded in getting the U.S. into war, Holt warned,
"American boys will spill their blood for profiteers, politicians and
'paytriots.' If war comes, on the hands of the sponsors of the White
Committee will be blood-the blood of Americans killed in a needless
war."[37]
In March 1941 a list of most of the Committee's financial backers was
made public. It revealed the nature of the forces eager to bring
America into the European war. Powerful international banking
interests were well represented. J.P. Morgan, John W. Morgan, Thomas
W. Lamont and others of the great Morgan banking house were listed.
Other important names from the New York financial world included Mr.
and Mrs. Paul Mellon, Felix M. and James F. Warburg, and J. Malcolm
Forbes. Chicago department store owner and publisher Marshall Field
was a contributor, as was William Averill Harriman, the railroad and
investment millionaire who later served as Roosevelt's ambassador in
Moscow.
Of course, Jewish names made up a substantial portion of the long
list. Hollywood film czar Samuel Goldwyn of Goldwyn Studios was there,
along with David Dubinsky, the head of the International Ladies
Garment Workers Union. The William S. Paley Foundation, which had been
set up by the head of the giant Columbia Broadcasting System,
contributed to the Committee. The name of Mrs. Herbert H. Lehman, wife
of the New York Governor, was also on the list.[38]
Without an understanding of his intimate ties to organized Jewry,
Roosevelt's policies make little sense. As Jewish historian Lucy
Dawidowicz noted: "Roosevelt himself brought into his immediate circle
more Jews than any other President before or after him. Felix
Frankfurter, Bernard M. Baruch and Henry Morgenthau were his close
advisers. Benjamin V. Cohen, Samuel Rosenman and David K. Niles were
his friends and trusted aides."[39] This is perhaps not so remarkable
in light of Roosevelt's reportedly one-eighth Jewish ancestry.[40]
In his diary entry of 1 May 1941, Charles A. Lindbergh, the American
aviator hero and peace leader, nailed the coalition that was pushing
the United States into war:
The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to
it, but the Administration seems to have 'the bit in its teeth' and
[is] hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the
country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and
radio and most of our motion pictures. There are also the
'intellectuals,' and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British agents who are
allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many
others.[41]
Joseph Kennedy shared Lindbergh's apprehensions about Jewish power.
Before the outbreak of war he privately expressed concerns about "the
Jews who dominate our press" and world Jewry in general, which he
considered a threat to peace and prosperity. Shortly after the
beginning of hostilities, Kennedy lamented "the growing Jewish
influence in the press and in Washington demanding continuance of the
war "[42]
Roosevelt's efforts to get Poland, Britain and France into war against
Germany succeeded all too well. The result was untold death and misery
and destruction. When the fighting began, as Roosevelt had intended
and planned, the Polish and French leaders expected the American
president to at least make good on his assurances of backing in case
of war. But Roosevelt had not reckoned on the depth of peace sentiment
of the vast majority of Americans. So, in addition to deceiving his
own people, Roosevelt also let down those in Europe to whom he had
promised support.
Seldom in American history were the people as united in their views as
they were in late 1939 about staying out of war in Europe. When
hostilities began in September 1939, the Gallup poll showed 94 percent
of the American people against involvement in war. That figure rose to
96.5 percent in December before it began to decline slowly to about 80
percent in the Fall of 1941. (Today, there is hardly an issue that
even 60 or 70 percent of the people agree upon.)[43]
Roosevelt was, of course, quite aware of the intensity of popular
feeling on this issue. That is why he lied repeatedly to the American
people about his love of peace and his determination to keep the U.S.
out of war, while simultaneously doing everything in his power to
plunge Europe and America into war.
In a major 1940 re-election campaign speech, Roosevelt responded to
the growing fears of millions of Americans who suspected that their
President had secretly pledged United States support to Britain in its
war against Germany. These well-founded suspicions were based in part
on the publication in March of the captured Polish documents. The
speech of 23 October 1940 was broadcast from Philadelphia to the
nation on network radio. In the most emphatic language possible,
Roosevelt categorically denied that he had
pledged in some way the participation of the United States in some
foreign war. I give to you and to the people of this country this most
solemn assurance: There is no secret Treaty, no secret understanding
in any shape or form, direct or indirect, with any Government or any
other nation in any part of the world, to involve this nation in any
war or for any other purpose.[44]
We now know, of course, that this pious declaration was just another
one of Roosevelt's many brazen, bald-faced lies to the American
people.
Roosevelt's policies were more than just dishonest-they were criminal.
The Constitution of the United States grants authority only to the
Congress to make war and peace. And Congress had passed several major
laws to specifically insure U.S. neutrality in case of war in Europe.
Roosevelt continually violated his oath as President to uphold the
Constitution. If his secret policies had been known, the public demand
for his impeachment would very probably have been unstoppable.
The Watergate episode has made many Americans deeply conscious of the
fact that their presidents can act criminally. That affair forced
Richard Nixon to resign his presidency, and he is still widely
regarded as a criminal. No schools are named after him and his name
will never receive the respect that normally goes to every American
president. But Nixon's crimes pale into insignificance when compared
to those of Franklin Roosevelt. What were Nixon's lies compared to
those of Roosevelt? What is a burglary cover-up compared to an illegal
and secret campaign to bring about a major war?
Those who defend Roosevelt's record argue that he lied to the American
people for their own good-that he broke the law for lofty principles.
His deceit is considered permissible because the cause was noble,
while similar deception by presidents Johnson and Nixon, to name two,
is not. This is, of course, a hypocritical double standard. And the
argument doesn't speak very well for the democratic system. It implies
that the people are too dumb to understand their own best interests.
It further suggests that the best form of government is a kind of
benevolent liberal-democratic dictatorship.
Roosevelt's hatred for Hitler was deep, vehement, passionate-almost
personal. This was due in no small part to an abiding envy and
jealousy rooted in the great contrast between the two men, not only in
their personal characters but also in their records as national
leaders.
Superficially, the public fives of Roosevelt and Hitler were
astonishingly similar. Both assumed the leadership of their respective
countries at the beginning of 1933. They both faced the enormous
challenge of mass unemployment during a catastrophic worldwide
economic depression. Each became a powerful leader in a vast military
alliance during the most destructive war in history. Both men died
while still in office within a few weeks of each other in April 1945,
just before the end of the Second World War in Europe. But the
enormous contrasts in the lives of these two men are even more
remarkable.
Roosevelt was born into one of the wealthiest families in America. His
was a life utterly free of material worry. He took part in the First
World War from an office in Washington as UnderSecretary of the Navy.
Hitler, on the other hand, was born into a modest provinicial family.
As a young man he worked as an impoverished manual laborer. He served
in the First World War as a front line soldier in the hell of the
Western battleground. He was wounded many times and decorated for
bravery.
In spite of his charming manner and soothing rhetoric, Roosevelt
proved unable to master the great challenges facing America. Even
after four years of his presidency, millions remained unemployed,
undernourished and poorly housed in a vast land richly endowed with
all the resources for incomparable prosperity. The New Deal was
plagued with bitter strikes and bloody clashes between labor and
capital. Roosevelt did nothing to solve the country's deep, festering
racial problems which erupted repeatedly in riots and armed conflict.
The story was very different in Germany. Hitler rallied his people
behind a radical program that transformed Germany within a few years
from an economically ruined land on the edge of civil war into
Europe's powerhouse. Germany underwent a social, cultural and economic
rebirth without parallel in history. The contrast between the
personalities of Roosevelt and Hitler was simultaneously a contrast
between two diametrically different social-political systems and
ideologies.
And yet, it would be incorrect to characterize Roosevelt as merely a
cynical politician and front man for powerful alien interests.
Certainly he did not regard himself as an evil man. He sincerely
believed that he was doing the right and noble thing in pressuring
Britain and France into war against Germany. Like Wilson before him,
and others since, Roosevelt felt himself uniquely qualified and called
upon by destiny to reshape the world according to his vision of an
egalitarian, universalist democracy. He was convinced, as so many
American leaders have been, that the world could be saved from itself
by remodeling it after the United States.
Presidents like Wilson and Roosevelt view the world not as a complex
of different nations, races and cultures which must mutually respect
each others' separate collective identities in order to live together
in peace, but rather according to a selfrighteous missionary
perspective that divides the globe into morally good and evil
countries. In that scheme of things, America is the providentially
permanent leader of the forces of righteousness. Luckily, this view
just happens to correspond to the economic and political interests of
those who wield power in the United States.
President Roosevelt's War
In April 1941, Senator Gerald Nye of North Dakota prophetically
predicted that one day the Second World War would be remembered as
Roosevelt's war. "If we are ever involved in this war, it will be
called by future historians by only one title, 'the President's War,'
because every step of his since his Chicago quarantine speech [of 5
October 1937] has been toward war.[45]
The great American historian, Harry Elmer Barnes, believed that war
could probably have been prevented in 1939 if it had not been for
Roosevelt's meddling. "Indeed, there is fairly conclusive evidence
that, but for Mr. Roosevelt's pressure on Britain, France and Poland,
and his commitments to them before September 1939, especially to
Britain, and the irresponsible antics of his agent provocateur,
William C. Bullitt, there would probably have been no world war in
1939, or, perhaps, for many years thereafter."[46] In Revisionism: A
Key to Peace, Barnes wrote:
President Roosevelt had a major responsibility, both direct and
indirect, for the outbreak of war in Europe. He began to exert
pressure on France to stand up to Hitler as early as the German
reoccupation of the Rhineland in March 1936, months before he was
making his strongly isolationist speeches in the campaign of 1936.
This pressure on France, and also England, continued right down to the
coming of the war in September 1939. It gained volume and momentum
after the quarantine speech of October 1937. As the crisis approached
between Munich and the outbreak of war, Roosevelt pressed the Poles to
stand firm against any demands by Germany, and urged the English and
French to back up the Poles unflinchingly.
There is grave doubt that England would have gone to war in September
1939 had it not been for Roosevelt's encouragement and his assurances
that, in the event of war, the United States would enter on the side
of Britain just as soon as he could swing American public opinion
around to support intervention.
Roosevelt had abandoned all semblance of neutrality, even before war
broke out in 1939, and moved as speedily as was safe and feasible in
the face of anti-interventionist American public opinion to involve
this country in the European conflict.[47]
One of the most perceptive verdicts on Franklin Roosevelt's place in
history came from the pen of the great Swedish explorer and author,
Sven Hedin. During the war he wrote:
The question of the way it came to a new world war is not only to be
explained because of the foundation laid by the peace treaties of
1919, or in the suppression of Germany and her allies after the First
World War, or in the continuation of the ancient policies of Great
Britain and France. The decisive push came from the other side of the
Atlantic Ocean.
Roosevelt speaks of democracy and destroys it incessantly. He slanders
as undemocratic and un-American those who admonish him in the name of
peace and the preservation of the American way of life. He has made
democracy into a caricature rather than a model. He talks about
freedom of speech and silences those who don't hold his opinion.
He talks about freedom of religion and makes an alliance with
Bolshevism.
He talks about freedom from want, but cannot provide ten million of
his own people with work, bread or shelter. He talks about freedom
from the fear of war while working for war, not only for his own
people but for the world, by inciting his country against the Axis
powers when it might have united with them, and he thereby drove
millions to their deaths.
This war will go down in history as the war of President
Roosevelt.[48]
Officially orchestrated praise for Roosevelt as a great man of peace
cannot conceal forever his crucial role in pushing Europe into war in
1939.
It is now more than forty years since the events described here took
place. For many they are an irrelevant part of a best-forgotten past.
But the story of how Franklin Roosevelt engineered war in Europe is
very pertinent-particularly for Americans today. The lessons of the
past have never been more important than in this nuclear age. For
unless at least an aware minority understands how and why wars are
made, we will remain powerless to restrain the warmongers of our own
era.
Notes
1. See, for example: Charles A. Beard, President Roosevelt and
the Coming of the War 1941 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1948);
William Henry Chamberlin, America's Second Crusade (Chicago: Regnery,
1952, 1962); Benjamin Colby, 'Twas a Famous Victory (New Rochelle,
N.Y.: Arlington House, 1979); Frederic R. Sanborn, Design for War (New
York: Devin-Adair, 1951); William Stevenson, A Man Called Intrepid
(New York: Ballantine Books, 1980); Charles C. Tansill, Back Door to
War (Chicago: Regnery, 1952); John Toland, Infamy: Pearl Harbor and
Its Aftermath (New York: Doubleday, 1982).
2. Saul Friedlander, Prelude to Downfall: Hitler and the United
States 1939-1941 (New York: Knopf, 1967), pp. 73-77; U.S., Congress,
House, Special Committee on Investigation of Un-American Activities in
the United States, 1940, Appendix, Part II, pp. 1054-1059.
3. Friedlander, pp. 75-76.
4. New York Times, 30 March 1940, p. 1.
5. Ibid., p. 4, and 31 March 1940, p. 1.
6. New York Times, 30 March 1940, p. 1. Baltimore Sun, 30 March
1940, p. 1.
7. A French-language edition was published in 1944 under the
title Comment Roosevelt est Entre en Guerre.
8. Tansill, "The United States and the Road to War in Europe," in
Harry Elmer Barnes (ed.), Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace (Caldwell,
Idaho: Caxton, 1953; reprint eds., New York: Greenwood, 1969 and
Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review [supplemented],
1982), p. 184 (note 292). Tansill also quoted from several of the
documents in his Back Door to War, pp. 450-51.
9. Harry Elmer Barnes, The Court Historians Versus Revisionism
(N.p.: privately printed, 1952), p. 10. This booklet is reprinted in
Barnes, Selected Revisionist Pamphlets (New York: Arno Press & The New
York Times, 1972), and in Barnes, The Barnes Trilogy (Torrance,
Calif.: Institute for Historical Review, 1979).
10. Chamberlin, p. 60.
11. Edward Raczynski, In Allied London (London: Weidenfeld and
Nicolson, 1963), p. 51.
12. Orville H. Bullitt (ad.), For the President: Personal and
Secret (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972), p. x1v [biographical
foreword]. See also Time, 26 October 1936, p. 24.
13. Current Biography 1940, ed. Maxine Block (New York: H.W.
Wilson, 1940), p. 122 ff.
14. Gisleher Wirsing, Der masslose Kontinent: Roosevelts Kampf um
die Weltherrschaft (Jena: E. Diederichs, 1942), p. 224.
15. Bullitt obituary in New York Times, 16 February 1967, p. 44.
16. Jack Alexander, "He Rose From the Rich," Saturday Evening
Post, 11 March 1939, p. 6. (Also see continuation in issue of 18 March
1939.) Bullitt's public views on the European scene and what should be
America's attitude toward it can be found in his Report to the
American People (Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Cambridge: Riverside
Press], 1940), the text of a speech he delivered, with the President's
blessing, under the auspices of the American Philosophical Society in
Independence Hall in Philadelphia shortly after the fall of France.
For sheer, hyperventilated stridency and emotionalist hysterics, this
anti-German polemic could hardly be topped, even given the similar
propensities of many other interventionists in government and the
press in those days.
17. Michael R. Beschloss, Kennedy and Roosevelt (New York: Norton,
1980), pp. 203-04.
18. Robert Dallek, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign
Policy 1932-1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 31. See
also pp. 164-65.
19. Dispatch No. 349 of 20 September 1938 by Sir. R. Lindsay,
Documents on British Foreign Policy (ed. Ernest L. Woodward), Third
series, Vol. VII (London, 1954), pp. 627-29. See also: Joseph P. Lash,
Roosevelt and Churchill 1939-1941 (New York: Norton, 1976), pp. 25-27;
Dallek, pp. 164-65; Arnold A. Offner, America and the Ori-, gins of
World War II (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971), p. 61.
20. William Phillips, Ventures in Diplomacy (North Beverly, Mass.:
privately published, 1952), pp. 220-21.
21. Carl Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission 1937-1939 (Munich:
Callwey, 1960), p. 225.
22. Drew Pearson and Robert S. Allen, "Washington Daily
Merry-Go-Round," Washington Times-Herald, 14 April 1939, p. 16. A
facsimile reprint of this column appears in Conrad Grieb (ed.),
American Manifest Destiny and The Holocausts (New York: Examiner
Books, 1979), pp. 132-33. See also: Wirsing, pp. 238-41.
23. Jay P. Moffat, The Moffat Papers 1919-1943 (Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 1956), p. 232.
24. U.S., Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United
States (Diplomatic Papers), 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington: 1956),
p. 122.
25. "Von Wiegand Says-," Chicago Herald-American, 8 October 1944,
p. 2.
26. Edvard Benes, Memoirs of Dr. Eduard Benes (London: George
Allen & Unwin, 1954), pp. 79-80.
27. Lash, p. 64.
28. Hamilton Fish, FDR: The Other Side of the Coin (Now York:
Vantage, 1976; Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review,
1980), p. 62.
29. James V. Forrestal (ads. Walter Millis and E.S. Duffield), The
Forrestal Diaries (New York: Viking, 1951), pp. 121-22. I have been
privately informed by a colleague who has examined the original
manuscript of the Forrestal diaries that many very critical references
to the Jews were deleted from the published version.
30. Jan Szembek, Journal 1933-1939 (Paris: Plan, 1952), pp.
475-76.
31. David E. Koskoff, Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times
(Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974), p. 207; Moffat, p. 253;
A.J.P. Taylor, The Origins of the Second World War (London: Hamish
Hamilton, 1961; 2nd ed. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Premier [paperback],
1965), p. 262; U.S., Department of State, Foreign Relations of the
United States, 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington: 1956), p. 355.
32. Dallek, p. 164.
33. Beschloss, pp. 190-91; Lash, p. 75; Koskoff, pp. 212-13.
34. Hull to Kennedy (No. 905), U.S., Department of State, Foreign
Relations of the United States, 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington:
1956), p. 424.
35. The radio addresses of Hamilton Fish quoted here were
published in the Congressional Record Appendix (Washington) as
follows: (6 January 1939) Vol. 84, Part 11, pp. 52-53; (5 March 1939)
same, pp. 846-47; (5 April 1939) Vol. 84, Part 12, pp. 1342-43; (21
April 1939) same, pp. 1642-43; (26 May 1939) Vol. 84, Part 13, pp.
2288-89; (8 July 1939) same, pp. 3127-28.
36. Wayne S. Cole, Charles A. Lindbergh and the Battle Against
American Intervention in World War II (New York: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, 1974), pp. 128, 136-39.
37. Congressional Record Appendix (Washington: 1941), (30 December
1940) Vol. 86, Part 18, pp. 7019-25. See also: Appendix, Vol. 86, Part
17, pp. 5808-14.
38. New York Times, 11 March 1941, p. 10.
39. Lucy Dawidowicz, "American Jews and the Holocaust," The New
York Times Magazine, 18 April 1982, p. 102.
40. "FDR 'had a Jewish great-grandmother'" Jewish Chronicle
(London), 5 February 1982, p. 3.
41. Charles A. Lindbergh, The Wartime Journals of Charles A.
Lindbergh (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970), p. 481.
42. Koskoff, pp. 282, 212. The role of the American press in
fomenting hatred against Germany between 1933 and 1939 is a subject
that deserves much more detailed treatment. Charles Tansill provides
some useful information on this in Back Door to War. The essay by
Professor Hans A. Muenster, "Die Kriegsschuld der Presse der USA" in
Kriegsschuld und Presse, published in 1944 by the German
Reichsdozentenfuehrung, is worth consulting.
43. An excellent essay relating and contrasting American public
opinion measurements to Roosevelt's foreign policy moves in 1939-41 is
Harry Elmer Barnes, Was Roosevelt Pushed Into War By Popular Demand in
1941? (N.p.: privately printed, 1951). It is reprinted in Barnes,
Selected Revisionist Pamphlets.
44. Lash, p. 240.
45. New York Times, 27 April 1941, p. 19.
46. Harry Elmer Barnes, The Struggle Against the Historical
Blackout, 2nd ed. (N.p.: privately published, ca. 1948), p. 12. See
also the 9th, final revised and enlarged edition (N.p.: privately
published, ca. 1954), p. 34; this booklet is reprinted in Barnes,
Selected Revisionist Pamphlets.
47. Harry Elmer Barnes, "Revisionism: A Key to Peace," Rampart
Journal of Individualist Thought Vol. II, No. 1 (Spring 1966), pp.
29-30. This article was republished in Barnes, Revisionism: A Key to
Peace and Other Essays (San Francisco: Cato Institute [Cato Paper No.
12], 1980).
48. Sven Hedin, Amerika im Kampf der Kontinente (Leipzig: F.A.
Brockhaus, 1943), p. 54.
Bibliography
Listed here are the published editions of the Polish documents, the
most important sources touching on the questions of their authenticity
and content, and essential recent sources on what President Roosevelt
was really-as opposed to publicly-doing and thinking during the
prelude to war. Full citations for all references in the article will
be found in the notes.
Beschloss, Michael R. Kennedy and Roosevelt. New York: Norton, 1980.
Bullitt, Orville H. (ed.). For the President: Personal and Secret.
[Correspondence between Franklin D. Roosevelt and William C. Bullitt.]
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
Germany. Foreign Office Archive Commission. Roosevelts Weg in den
Krieg: Geheimdokumente zur Kriegspolitik des Praesidenten der
Vereinigten Staaten. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag, 1943.
Germany. Foreign Office. The German White Paper. [White Book No. 3.]
New York: Howell, Soskin and Co., 1940.
Germany. Foreign Office. Polnische Dokumente zur Vorgeschichte des
Kriegs. [White Book No. 3.] Berlin: F. Eher, 1940.
Koskoff, David E. Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times. Englewood
Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
Lukasiewicz, Juliusz (Waclaw Jedrzejewicz, ed.). Diplomat in Paris
1936-1939. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.
Wirsing, Giselher. Der masslose Kontinent: Roosevelts Kampf um die
Weltherrschaft. Jena: E. Diederichs, 1942.
Topaz
The Germans removed the Jews from ruling over them. That is what
America needs to do:
Here are some quotes from a German pamphlet titled "Why the Aryan
Law?":
"In 1793 the famous philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte, author of
"Speeches to the German Nation," wrote a pamphlet titled "A
Contribution to Correcting Judgments about the French Revolution." It
contained the following significant sentence:
"In nearly all the nations of Europe, a powerful, hostile government
is growing, and is at war with all the others, and sometimes oppresses
the people in dreadful ways: It is Jewry!"
The French Revolution, with its "ideas for the improvement of
humanity" thundered past, and in the noise the people who had believed
in world brotherhood entirely missed this serious warning. What Fichte
warned the word about then has today become fact in nearly all the
nations of the world. The Jewish people, once only tolerated, knew how
to raise a hue and cry about discrimination and persecution, winning
the sympathy of the world for the "poor Jews." They increasingly
infiltrated deep within our national organism, growing to have power
over every single area of our national life. The old saga, the "Edda,"
observes that one blocks a river at its source. The failure to do that
was the great mistake of the German people. Thank God, it is not too
late. Our Fuehrer Adolf Hitler recognized the importance of the
problem for Germany's rebirth, and outlined its solution in his
program.
Martin Luther wrote this of the Jews in his book "The Jews and their
Lies": "They hold we Christians captive in our own land. They have
seized our goods by their cursed usury, they mock and insult us
because we work. They are our lords, and we and our goods belong to
them." If in the coming days the Jewish race is driven out of the
non-Jewish world, it will have at least this consolation: It has made
clear to them for all time the value of maintaining the purity of race
and blood in clear, understandable and unforgettable ways.
National Socialist racial legislation has reduced the influence of
Jewry in all professions, and above all excluded them from the leading
offices of the nation. That is an important step in the relationship
between Germans and Jews, but one cannot ignore the fact that we have
not yet fully eliminated the influence of the Jewish foreign body in
German national life. It is not a question of German-Jewish
coexistence, rather of making as great as possible a separation
between blood and blood.
Three things are involved here:
A knowledge of the basic principles of National Socialist racial
thinking,
An understanding of the growth and expansion of Jewry,
The dominant sociological position of Jewry, to show how it dominated
the German people economically, intellectually and politically..."
"In discussing the Jewish Question, even today one encounters
resistance and misunderstandings, especially in intellectual circles.
This can only be explained by the intellectual education of the
political past. This is especially evident when one discusses the
fundamental issues.
Whenever a new thought arises in the world and calls people to
practical action, the old world resists because it feels its
foundations threatened. Its old standpoint has ruled for decades, and
it looks uncomprehendingly at a new idea that does not fit into the
accustomed patterns of thinking. That is natural. When the new idea
and worldview are truly revolutionary, they are on a different level
of human thought and feeling, and there can be no compromise. Its
realization depends on people who support it, and who are ready to
fight to transform the life of the individual and of the nation in
every way..."
"In the long run, no idea is better suited to guarantee peace between
nations than National Socialist racial thinking, which calls for the
furtherance and maintenance of one's own race and one's own people,
and supports similar efforts on the part of other nations..."
"The new Germany that views its own race and ethnicity positively must
therefore distinguish within its territory between one race and
another, between one people and another. Mixing of blood harms both
sides. Race is an issue for every people if they are to live according
to their nature. The German people is not so arrogant as to believe
that is is the chosen people. The familiar quotation from Geibel, "The
world should enjoy German ways," should be understood in the context
of the dreams of world betterment of those past days.
The National Socialist racial viewpoint has clear consequences for the
relationship between Germans and Jews. People have often said that
National Socialism's approach to the racial question is purely
negative and destructive, and that its essential characteristic is
radical anti-Semitism. One must grant that we made the Jewish question
clearer than anyone else, and taught an entire generation that had
been taught to see all people the same to recognize the importance of
the Jewish question not only for our people, but for the entire world.
Our treatment of the Jewish problem in the years before we took power
must be seen as the political education of the German people, which
had lost its racial instincts to a dangerous degree.
The question took on its own nature in Germany, Many citizens had
their eyes opened, and the simultaneous appeal to all the heroic and
manly virtues of the German man resulted in a racial selection of
political fighters who today stand at the head of the new state.
Formerly, the Jewish question, as seen by the state, was a matter of
complete equality and the unhindered immigration of Jews from the
East. This is the best proof of how racial feeling and consciousness
had been lost. Our tone was not purely negative or the simple
rejection of others, rather the emphasis was on the positive values of
our own people. This does require noting that Jewry through its
Marxist class struggle leadership role and its international financial
measures aimed at Germany supported every kind of anti-national action
in the cultural and political fields. Jewry should not complain if its
anti-German activities, which have no counterpart in any other
country, call forth from the people the defensive reaction of
anti-Semitism.
The starting point of the discussion is the scientific fact that the
Jew is different than the German. This is neither arrogant nor
boastful, it simply is the way things are. For us, the Jewish question
is a question between two peoples. Its characteristics are determined
by the racially determined differences between the two, and through
the unusual sociological and numerical development of Jewry in the
course of its history, developments that are particularly evident in
the last decades through a constantly growing process of foreign
infiltration that has reached an intolerable level for the German
people.
More than once over its history, the German people has absorbed
foreign elements, but they were racially identical or similar
population groups, as for example was the case with the Huguenots.
With the Jews, things are fundamentally different. They are seen
everywhere as foreigners, and see themselves that way as well. Walter
Rathenau said it most clearly as early as 1897: "How strange! In the
middle of German life there is a separate, foreign tribe that stands
out in every way with its hot-tempered behavior. An Asiatic horde has
settled on the sands of Mark Brandenburg." Einstein said something in
1931: "I have to laugh when I hear the phrase 'German citizen of the
Jewish faith.' These citizens first of all want nothing to do with my
poor Eastern European brothers, and second do not want to be sons of
my (Jewish) people, but only members of the Jewish cultural community.
Is that honest? Can a non-Jew respect such people? I am not a German
citizen. I am a Jew, and am happy to belong to the Jewish people."
The most remarkable thing about Jewry is that it has not disappeared
over the millennia, even though it lacks its own territory and
language. Even more remarkable is that it lacks the main
characteristic of a minority population, its own pockets of settlement
to which it could if necessary retreat. Only time will tell if
Palestine will someday fill this gap. That question is made more
difficult by the fact that the Arabs maintain their claim on
Palestine. Whatever the twists of history, the Jew has always remained
the same, whether as a grain speculator in ancient Rome or as a bank
or stock exchange potentate in the modern era. They were always able
to control the wealth of whole nations. Nations and peoples once their
contemporaries have vanished, leaving only words and crumbled
monuments behind; only the Jew remains. In ancient days we see him
carrying on his business in the trading centers of the Mediterranean.
In the Middle Ages he provided money for German nobles and free
cities. Today he rules the banks and stock exchanges of the whole
world, forcing the nations under the yoke of financial capitalism. The
power of this people of 15 million rests on these international
relations. This is how they seem to fulfill the commandment of Jehovah
- the world domination of the chosen people.
The secret of the Jewish people, which has enabled them to survive
through all of history's twists and turns, is that it has always
recognized the laws of blood, even anchoring them in the laws of its
religion. The consciousness of blood and family that believing Jews
have has been stronger than all the other forces of history, giving us
a unique example of a people without its own land and language, which
still meets the criteria for being a people, and which has outlasted
many other peoples.
This historic manifestation of Jewry, which is unique, brings to the
fore the question of the relationship between the host and guest
peoples. It has been answered in differing ways throughout history,
depending on the worldview and thinking then predominant.
Since the Jews were dispersed they have been held together by the laws
of their religion and their faith that they were the chosen people.
Until the middle of the 18th Century, Germans and Jews lived apart
from each other. The Jews had no opportunity to become involved in the
religious of political-intellectual life of their host people. On the
other hand, they could practice their own customs without
interference. They had their own religion and their own laws. During
the Middle Ages, the Ghetto was the way Jewry could maintain itself in
the midst of other peoples and fulfill its Jewish duties, which grew
out of its race, origins and laws. The values and ideals of other
peoples were not affected. This separation was only possible because
the views of the host people were as strong as those of the Jews.
According to the writer Grau: "There was no racial defilement or
baptism, no attempt to join a nation that one could never be a member
of, and no attempt to intellectually silence the host people." In the
Ghetto of the Middle Ages, the Jew developed his nature and
characteristics, which were later to become significant, while
maintaining the community of blood and race. The latter is
particularly important, since the strict physical separation between
the host and guest peoples maintained the foreign nature that we daily
see so clearly, now that the barriers between have long since fallen.
Even in the Middle Ages, the most important thing was not the
difference between the Christian and Mosaic faiths. Rather, there was
on the one hand the natural sense that the Jew was of a foreign race,
and on the other hand the strict law of blood which demanded a clear
separation if the Jews were to fulfill Jehovah's mission, which had
guided them from the beginning. Just this has always been kept in the
background by historians, who present the Ghetto as a tolerated asylum
for Jewish martyrs persecuted on account of their faith. There is a
gap to be filled here. The task of historians writing from our new
viewpoint will be to examine the portrait of the Ghetto of the Middle
Ages to discover its importance for the development of Jewry and the
relationship between the guest and host peoples. Even the Jewish side
is demanding that. O. Karbach criticizes historical writing because it
"in significant ways conceals the historical fact that the Jews in the
centuries before their emancipation possessed a legal standing that
was better than the greater part of the rest of the population, namely
complete or partial agricultural freedom. (Ordnung in der Judenfrage,
edited by E. Czermak, Reinhold, Vienna, 1933).
The barriers between Germans and Jews fell as a result of the
Enlightenment and the French Revolution. The path to Jewish world
domination would take a different direction than pious, observant Jews
had expected. Emancipation made it possible to build Jewish dominance
through secular means. With the disappearance of racial consciousness,
only religious differences seemed to remain. It seemed at the time
unjust to give someone a preferred position only because of his
religious beliefs, which are an entirely personal matter. At the time,
this was tied to a belief in human equality and freedom. It was
revolutionary. It shattered the church dogmas that had ruled for
centuries and was the foundation of liberal thinking during the last
two hundred years. The new goal was humanity itself, and nothing stood
in the way of racial mixing. Some had the quiet hope that assimilation
would mean the absorption of Jewry. Jewry itself, however, was more
than willing to use the opportunities of religious assimilation, which
opened the path to all important positions, even to political
leadership. As H. Heine said, "baptism was the ticket to European
culture." Gradually, an intermixing with the German people developed,
particularly in its cultural elite. Foreign blood infiltrated to a
degree that we realize only today now that the "Law to Reestablish a
Professional Bureaucracy" has exposed numerous sources of foreign
blood. This process has greatly accelerated during the last fourteen
years.
Today the age of raceless thinking is being displaced by the ideals of
human variability. Values are rooted in origin and territory, and each
group has a historic mission based on its own unique and eternal
values. Such new racial thinking will of course secure the opposition
of those who either through faith or reason still believe in the unity
of humanity in culture, social order and organization. The Jews will
naturally oppose any discussion of race, since the denial of any
significant differences between people is the foundation of his
infiltration of Western European society. The Jew finds any mention of
the racial question as an attack on his current existence. His leading
role in every anti-national area is characteristic of his mimicry, and
is necessary for his continued existence. That explains the phrase
"German citizen of the Jewish faith."
The recognition that the Jew is of a foreign and different race along
with the reawakening of German racial consciousness must necessarily
lead to a change in the relations between Germans and Jews.
There is one point to keep in mind before examining the statistics.
Only those people who claimed to be Jews and were members of the
Mosaic faith were counted as Jews, not those who for internal or
external reasons belonged to another religion, or those who claimed to
be dissident Jews and therefore did not belong to the standard groups.
This is regrettable for our purposes, since we are interested not in
the influence of those who still claimed the Jewish religion, rather
those who belonged to the Jewish race! That includes all Jews, whether
of the Mosaic faith or baptized Christians. That is just what the
supporters of the Talmud and the Old Testament always said. They
complained that the state opened all offices to those "without
character," to "Christmas Jews," even admitting them to the officer
corps! The statistics given here must therefore be increased
significantly. The Jews are a race, and baptism does not in any way
change the foreign characteristics that are hostile to the German
people..."
Of course, the intellectual atmosphere that enabled the Jew to
infiltrate the German body politic quickly led the Jew himself to see
that conditions for his advancement were favorable, and that the way
to the top was open. He also realized what the population statistics
meant, indeed they were particularly clear to him, since 2/3 of his
kind lived in the big cities, the centers of the liberal worldview..."
"Nothing shows the differences between our people and the Jews more
clearly than their likes and dislikes for certain occupations. In some
occupations, particularly those that are most important for the nation
as a whole, the foreign influence on German life has reached an
intolerable extent not seen elsewhere in Europe. The preference for
certain occupations also gives us an interesting insight into the
spiritual nature of Jewry.
The following figures show how much critical occupations in Germany
have been infiltrated.
112,188 Jews, or 58.8%, far more than half, are employed in the area
of "commerce and transportation, including restaurants and taverns,"
but only 17.11% (3,248,145) of the population as a whole. In the area
of "industry and craft work, including mining and construction,"
19,318 Jews (25.85%) were employed, including 31.82% of foreigners.
For the population as a whole, the figure was 40.94% (7,771,799).
The figures in the field of "public administration, the judiciary, the
army and navy, churches, legal professionals and the independent
professions." 11,324 Jews were employed there, or 5.94% , over against
921,048 (4.85%) in the general population..."
In 1925, 0.81% of Jews were active as civil servants and the army and
navy, as opposed to 2.3% of the general population. In the church,
religious occupations, the legal system and the other independent
professions, the Jewish percentage is 4.3% as opposed to 2% of the
general population. This shows that the Jews are over-represented when
compared to the general population, particularly in the independent
professions.
The percentage of the Jewish population in government positions may
seem less than that of the general population, but the difference is
not as great as the figures first suggest. The most recent figures,
not yet entirely complete, suggest that a not insignificant number of
them are baptized Jews or dissidents formerly of the Jewish faith who
denied their Jewishness to gain an official position.
4.35% of Jews are employed in the medical and health care system,
including welfare, and 2.0% of foreign Jews. The figure for the
general population is 1.88%. The Jewish percentage is thus 2 1/2 times
as high as that of the general population.
In summary, Jewish occupational patterns differ from those of the rest
of the population. Jewry seems to have an aversion to agricultural
work, industrial labor and crafts. They are greatly over-represented
in commerce and transportation, including the entire banking system.
They are also over-represented in the independent professions and the
health care system. These figures alone demonstrate a clear difference
between the native German population and alien Jewry.
Very similar conditions prevail in all Western European nations and
also in North America, since Jews have spread throughout the world in
areas with growing industry and in cities that are centers of economic
and financial power. It is not true, as is often claimed, that the Jew
was systematically forced into commerce by the laws of the various
nations; rather, commerce particularly suits the Jew's nature. This is
supported by Dr. Arthur Ruppin, a scholar respected by the Jews. He
writes in his book The Jews of the Present (2nd edition, Cologne and
Leipzig, 1911, p. 45):
"Thanks to their significant commercial gifts (!), the Jews soon
enjoyed great success in commerce and industry. For 2000 years they
have seemed predestined to work in commerce. It is false to claim, as
some do, that Jews became merchants primarily because the Christians
denied them other occupations during the Middle Ages. The Jews did not
become merchants in Europe, rather they entered the profession in
growing numbers ever since the Babylonian Captivity in Syria, Egypt
and Babylon [because they dislike labor and prefer to have others work
for them! The Editor]. In Palestine until the dispersion they did live
primarily by agriculture. In the Diaspora, there was hardly anywhere
that the Jews lived by agriculture. The Middle Ages did not make them
into merchants. It only affirmed legally that which history had
already established. It is after all the rule that economic laws
generally do not create new conditions, but only legalize and regulate
that which already exists. The law would never have limited the Jews
to commerce in Europe if they had not already immigrated primarily as
merchants..."
Nearly all national economists agree that the Jews owe their role as
merchants not to chance, but to their excellent abilities as
merchants. As W. Sombart wrote: "The Jewish race is by nature the
incarnation of the capitalism-mercantile spirit." (Der moderne
Kapitalismus, Vol. 2, p. 349. Leipzig, 1902). Many others agree..."
"Similarly differences in the relative proportion of Jews by the
self-employed are evident in the medical field, which employs 0.5% of
the general population but 2.8% of the Jews, nearly six times as many.
Similar statistics are found in the cultural area (theater, film,
radio, education, teaching, etc.). The 0.4% of the general population
are employed there, 2.6% of the Jews, also about six times as many.
In the area of public administration and the judiciary, the percentage
of Jews in high positions is 2.0%, over against 1.3% of the general
population, nearly twice as high. The significance of these figures
becomes clear that when one realizes that the 2.3% of professional
Jews in public administration and the judiciary are in a branch where
the Jewish percentage of employees is only 0.81%. That means that the
Jews are especially represented in the important positions that
influence the whole government and leading branches of the economy.."
"The statistics may be interesting. The Jewish workers included 11,406
in industry, 2,220 in commerce and transportation, and 726 in
agriculture.
The following figures show most clearly the different social structure
of Jewry in Prussia over against the general population, and reveal
clearly Jewry's leading role in public life:.."
"On 19 May 1933 Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler gave an interview to
Bernard Ridder, an American journalist for the New York State
Newspaper. Discussing the Jewish Question in Germany, he said: "Should
I allow thousands of German-blooded people to be destroyed so that the
Jews can live and work in luxury while millions starve, falling victim
to Bolshevism out of desperation?"
Can the justice of his words be doubted when one recalls that,
according to the Prussian census of 16 June 1925 6.9% of all
independent pharmacists, 17.9% of all independent physicians, 4.8% of
all independent artists, 27% of all independent attorneys, 4.6% of
editors, 11% of theater directors, 7.5% of actors, and 14.8% of all
independent dentists were Jews! And these huge figures when the Jews
were only 1% of the population! Is that anything other than a
Jewdification of our entire cultural system?! And what would these
figures look like if one had had the ability to include baptized Jews
and dissidents?..."
"Berlin is the Jewish metropolis in Germany. The process of
Jewdification is considerably further along. That is understandable,
since one is in the immediate vicinity of the protective arms of
democracy and social democracy, where developments can occur
unhindered. Thus in Berlin on 16 June 1925 32.2% of the pharmacists
were Jews, as were 49.9% of the physicians, 7.5 of the graphic
artists, 50.2% of the attorneys, 8.5% of the editors, 14.2% of the
directors and theater heads, 12.3% of the actors and 37.5% of the
dentists.
These figures cry out for legal limitations on Jewry, and it is
surprising that former governments did not take the appropriate action
to tell the Jews "this far and no further."
The Jewish influence gave the rest of the world an entirely false
impression of the nature of the German people. Inside the Reich, they
poisoned the soul of the people, and all social and political
relationships. Until the national uprising, the leaders of the
National Socialist movement were persecuted, defamed and suppressed by
a system that was a willing tool in the hands of a foreign and
different race. The national revolution freed the German people from
this foreign influence, which had also dominated and ruined the German
press and public life in significant ways.
He who wants to understand the German revolution of 1933 must
understand that it had this goal: 'Germany must be governed by Germans
for Germans.' The central idea of the National Socialist revolution
was the longing of the German people to once more be master in every
area of its own life. As a great, confident people, we demand only
this of the other peoples: that they permit us, as their equals, to
govern ourselves as we wish and find our own way to happiness (Reich
Minister of the Interior Dr. Frick)..."
"The Jewdification of our colleges and universities over the years has
reached almost frightening proportions. We begin with a publication
from 1931. Karl Hoppmann, in his volume "On the State of Jewdification
in the Academic professions" found the following figures:
1. University of Berlin:
Medical faculty . . . . over 50%
Philosophical faculty . . . . 25%
2. University of Göttingen, 32% of the professors were Jewish:
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40.0%
Mathematics and Natural Sciences . . . 23.0%
3. University of Breslau
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.0%
4. University of Frankfurt (Main)
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.0%
Mathematics and Natural Sciences . . . 28.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.0%
Economics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28.0%
Jewry has a dominating role on the stock exchange. The board of the
Berlin stock exchange is almost exclusively Jewish. In the various
committees, the percentage of the Jewish race is sometimes many times
as high as the Aryan. The committees include:
That means that 117 or 147 members are Jews, or nearly 80%.
The extent of the Jewdification of German theater and film is evident
from 1931 figures. Of 234 theater directors, 118 (50.4%) were Jews, 92
(39.3%) were non-Jewish.
Berlin led in this area as well, with 23 of 29 theater directors (80%)
Jewish.
The situation in film is similar. The Viennese Catholic periodical
"Schönere Zukunft," which certainly cannot be accused of
anti-Semitism, wrote the following in its 3 February 1929 issue:
"The percentage of Jewry in today's film industry is so high, at least
by us in Germany, that there is only a tiny part left for Christian
firms."
Jewry has long sought political influence as well. This formerly
happened in covert ways, mostly through direct or indirect control of
money matters. Nearly every noble once had his financial Jew. Since
1848, the birth of political parties in Germany, Jewry has openly
sought to become a political power. The Jew Marx was the founder of
Marxist doctrine, the Jew Lassalle was the founder of the Social
Democratic Party. The founders of the Independent Social Democratic
Party of Germany were the Jews Bernstein, Haase, Kautsky, Hilferding,
Cohn, Davidsohn, Simon, Rosenfeld, Eisner, Levi, etc. Carl Liebknecht
and Rosa Luxemberg were the leaders of the Communist Party, and
recently the Jews Rosenfeld and Seydewitz founded the Socialist
Workers Party. Jews sat in the press offices and the various editorial
offices of party newspapers, and above all in the various
parliamentary factions..."
"We think it necessary to mention that the Communist wave that
threatened to destroy Germany politically, economically and
intellectually can primarily be traced back to Jewry.
Is it any wonder that the Jew is arrogant? The greater the Jewish
influence the more secure they feel, and the more ominously and
clearly their character and goals becomes clear: Pride, intolerance
and superiority on the one hand, a drive for world domination on the
other. Several pointed Jewish statements are examples:
Hochmut: The familiar "Dorfgeschichte"-Auerbach says: "We Jews are the
most intelligent race." "We are the chosen ones," says Dr. Berhard
Cohn (Jüdisch-Politische Streitfragen, 20, 22). He continues: "We may
carry our head high and demand particular respect. We must not only be
treated equally, but better. We deserve the particular respect of
other peoples."
Rabbi Dr. Rulf wrote a book ("Aruchas bar-Ammni," Israel's Healing,
Frankfurt a. M. 1883) in which he says: "The Jewish people is a
blessing for all peoples. The blessing has followed on the heels of
the Jews. A whole world lives from the Jews, who feed everyone, and
everywhere spread wealth and pleasure, comfort and prosperity. Only
the commerce of the Jews creates value. Work alone does not do that.
Half of the world's population would starve without the Jews."
The Jew Dr. Duschak wrote: "The world could not exist without the
Jews." The well-known Jew Sacher-Masoch explained the hatred of
anti-Semites against the Jews in this way: It is the same hatred a
Negro feels against the whites because of their superiority.
That the Jews even went so far as to suggest to Bismark that he make
the Jewish Day of Atonement a national holiday is certainly no sign of
modesty.
Intolerance: The Jew Klausner (Society, edited by Conrad, Volume 12)
wrote: "Anti-Semitism and criminality are nearly the same thing. There
are criminals who were not anti-Semites, but no anti-Semites who were
not criminals."
The work by Dr. E. Fuchs. "The Future of the Jews," (Berlin,
Philo-Verlag, 1924) judges our greatest historians, Hartmann and
Treitschke, who see the Jews as our misfortune: "Men blinded by
prejudice and hatred. Small, tiny men."
World Domination: The Jewish attorney Maurthner in Vienna said back in
the 1880's: "It is not just a matter of fighting anti-Semitism. We
want to oppose it with Jewish domination!"
They made the attempt. If the German people had not recovered their
senses at the last moment, and if they had not had a Fuehrer and
Chancellor named Adolf Hitler who recognized the danger and woke the
German people, we would have fallen into slavery. As we have already
noted, the Jew has always known how to rouse sympathy when things were
rough for him. Consider this report from the meeting of the PEN Club
in Ragusa at the end of May of last year: "Schalom Asch in his keynote
address noted that the suffering of the Jews in Germany had aroused
the sympathy of the entire world. Only the German government remained
untouched. He claimed the Jews has given Germany its deepest thoughts,
its most beautiful songs, its greatest poets, artists and
philosophers. Today one had crucified them in Germany and covered them
with their own blood." Mr. Schalom Asch began crying in the midst of
these outrageous lies. He spoke in the hope that his words would be
heard for the sake of justice and humanity throughout the world.
The Jew Asch cries! The German people are not moved. They want no
torture or persecution, but also no unjustified sympathy, only
justice! Remember always the worlds of Field Marshall Moltke: "The Jew
is a state within the state." Remember also the works of our great
historian Mommsen: "In antiquity too the Jew was the ferment of
cosmopolitanism and national decomposition." And remember Goethe: "The
Israelites have never done much; they possess few virtues, and most of
the deficiencies of other peoples!"
The Racial Question has an important role in the laws of other
nations, though other peoples and races are affected than in the
German Reich. It is in no way new or unusual that the German Reich is
active in this area. Contrary to opinions that surface here and there,
our laws are in no way directed against the Jewish religion, its
practice, or the freedom of the Jewish faith.
The German Reich has done nothing but introduce constitutional
legislation to provide the kind of civil service necessary to
guarantee the secure administration of the Reich. The laws do not
render it impossible for a citizen of a foreign state to become a
civil servant. Indeed, if he is appointed to such a position, he
receives full citizenship in the Reich. German civil servants should
however be of Aryan descent. The so-called Aryan Law requires that
each civil servant be of German blood. Since the vast majority of
non-Aryan civil servants were Jews, the first guidelines to the law
paid particular attention to those who were members of the Jewish
race. But we did not simply throw out the non-Aryan civil servants,
but retired them with honor and a pension. The people's state could
hardly proceed in a more legal and mild manner. Germany did not want
to attack Jewry wildly, rather only deal with its results, is clear
from the fact that the Law of 7 April 1933 left untouched all
non-Aryan civil servants who had been appointed before 1 August 1914,
and by the fact that the private sphere not affected. Some complain
that the law extends to half and quarter Aryans. The answer is that
the foreign influence in the civil service had grown to such a
dangerous extent that it was almost impossible for young Germans to
enter these professions." (Reich Minister of the Interior Dr.
Frick..."
Topaz
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
Topaz
NOT JOURNALISTS_ZIONIST PROPAGANDISTS
From: libb...@hotmail.com <mailto:libb...@hotmail.com> (libby)
Date: 9/4/02 6:46 PM Pacific Daylight
Sept.04/2002
It's important for the American people to know that all those
'American' journalists/talking heads that they see and read in the
Zionist controlled print and electronic mass media are not working for
America's interests. The very fact that they appear on CNN or write
for the Washington Post, for example, conveys the impression in the
minds of Americans that these 'journalists' are loyal Americans who
have America's best interests at heart. They are, in fact, leading
players in a huge deception and manipulation of the American people
that when attached to a cause such as, 'support of Israel', or
'attacking Iraq', is unrelenting in it's intensity and scope... Fact
is, they
are part of the same ruling elites of mostly Zionists who by now have
a virtual stranglehold on power in America.
And even as I write this, there on CNN's TALKBACK LIVE is Daniel Pipes
of Middle East Forum, propagandizing in favor of a unilateral military
attack on a sovereign nation, Iraq. An act that if committed by any
country other than America, would be considered a war crime and
justification for America to go to war against the invading country.
The following is an excerpt from the foreword to Aldous Huxley's BRAVE
NEW WORLD.
=============
begin excerpt
=============
The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by
doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is the truth, but
still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth.
By simply not mentioning certain subjects, by lowering what Mr.
Churchill calls an 'iron curtain' between the masses and such facts or
arguments as the local political bosses regard as undesirable,
totalitarian propagandists have influenced [public] opinion much more
effectively than they could have done by the most eloquent
denunciations, the most compelling of logical rebuttals.
===========
end excerpt
===========
In plain English, propagandists don't necessarily need to lie to the
mass audience to control them. By not disclosing critical
facts/information, they ensure that no debate will ever take place on
these critical issues. This omitting of critical facts/information is
one of the very tactics used by CNN and the rest of the Zionist mass
media in America. There are many examples of this tactic and one that
comes to mind is the issue of Israel's weapons of mass
destruction(WMD's). The Zionist mass media in America does not discuss
this at all. They do not want public debate on this issue. One of the
reasons being, of course, that America's great 'ally' Israel stole
it's nuclear weapons program from America. Another issue that the
Zionists keep hidden from Americans is the $3,000,000,000 that goes to
Israel each year, payback from the 'Congress of traitors', no doubt,
for Zionist/Jewish election funding.
So Dear Americans: The next time you see/hear/read the 'work' of the
Zionist 'journalists', Kristol, Barnes, Krauthammer, Blitzer, Kagan
Zahn, Gaffney, Schneider, Limbaugh, Pipes, Kaplan, Lipsky, Zuckerman,
Goldberg and all the others, be aware that they and their bosses are
Zionists and their purpose is to serve the interests of
Zionism/Israel, AND NOT AMERICA. Take everything they say with a grain
of salt and a pound of critique.
=== =====
Roy Libby
=== =====
Truth and disclosure are a deceiver's greatest fears.
ZIONIST POWER STRUCTURE
IN AMERICA
Now that we have established the ruthless and criminal nature of
radical Zionism, one more lesson needs to be understood before we
return to the five dancing Israelis of 9-11 and other related stories.
Even the Zionists themselves have never denied that they have long
exerted great influence in America. But what we must understand is
that the Zionists do not merely influence United States policy....they
dominate it! It is this domination that enables them to pull off
monstrous crimes and then conceal them from the general public.
The observation that Zionists dominate the American media, government,
academia, and Hollywood has been made by many prominent Americans and
is easily verifiable by public information.
Henry Ford said this:
"If after having elected their man or group, obedience is not rendered
to the Jewish control, then you speedily hear of "scandals" and
"investigations" and "impeachments" for the removal of the
disobedient.
Usually a man with a "past" proves the most obedient instrument, but
even a good man can often be tangled up in campaign practices that
compromise him. It has been commonly known that Jewish manipulation of
American election campaigns have been so skillfully handled, that no
matter which candidate was elected, there was ready made a sufficient
amount of evidence to discredit him in case his Jewish masters needed
to discredit him." 33
Charles Lindbergh said this:
"Their greatest danger to this country lies in the Jewish ownership
and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our
government. 34
Admiral Thomas Moorer, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff under
Ronald Reagan said this:
"I've never seen a President-I don't care who he is-stand up to them
[the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they
want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. If the American
people understood what a grip those people have got on our government,
they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea
what goes on."
35
While a guest on ABC's Face the Nation, William Fulbright - US Senator
and Chairman of the US Foreign Relations committee - said this before
a national television audience:
"Israel controls the United States Senate. We should be more concerned
about the United States' interests." 36
Nationally syndicated columnist and former presidential candidate
Patrick Buchanan said:
"The United States Congress is Israeli occupied territory." 37
And US religious leader Billy Graham and President Richard Nixon once
had the following exchange, which was caught on tape:
GRAHAM: The Jewish stranglehold on the media has got to be broken or
this country's going down the drain". NIXON: "You believe that?"
GRAHAM: "Yes, sir." NIXON: "Oh boy. So do I. I can't ever say that but
I do believe it" 38
But enough of quoting others. Let's look at the facts of Zionist
control.
FACT: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, UPN, The Washington Post, The New York
Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Daily News, Time
Magazine, Newsweek, People Magazine, US News and World Report and
countless other media and Hollywood companies all have either a
Zionist CEO, a Zionist News Chief, or are owned by a media
conglomerate which has a Zionist CEO. 39 Have you ever noticed how
Hollywood movies always seem to portray Germans and Arabs as a bigoted
fanatics or as terrorists? Now you know why!
FACT: AIPAC, the Israeli lobbying organization, is the most feared
lobby in Washington DC. By their own admission, they are capable of
unseating Congressmen and Senators that do not carry out their
requests. The majority of Congressmen from both political parties
receive large donations from AIPAC. Writing for the Nation Magazine,
journalist Michael Massing explains:
"AIPAC is widely regarded as the most powerful foreign-policy lobby in
Washington. Its 60,000 members shower millions of dollars on hundreds
of members of Congress on both sides of the aisle. Newspapers like the
New York Times fear the Jewish lobby organizations as well. "It's very
intimidating," said a correspondent at another large daily. "The
pressure from these groups is relentless." 40 (emphasis added)
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=53>
FACT: The Pentagon is under the control of a hard core Zionist named
Richard Perle. The civilian Defense Policy Board actually wields more
control over the military establishment than the Defense Secretary or
the generals and admirals. There are a number of other Zionists who
serve on the board (Kissinger, Cohen, Schlessinger) as well as
non-jewish members who have always supported Israel and the expansion
of the "War on Terror". The notoriously belligerent Perle, nicknamed
the "The Prince of Darkness", is Chairman of the Board. 41
With Perle as Chairman of the Defense Policy Board, Zionist Paul
Wolfowitz as Undersecretary of Defense, and Zionist award winner
Douglass Feith as Undersecretary of Defense Policy, the Zionist
Pentagon gang controls 3 of the top 4 civilian leadership positions of
America's armed forces. Careerist scoundrels like Condoleeza Rice and
Donald Rumsfeld are either under their influence or unwilling to
oppose their drive for WW III. The Perle-Wolfowitz-Feith gang
represent a fanatical and warmongering
"government-within-a-government". In league with these Zionist
Pentagon conspirators are jewish Zionist and potential 2004
Presidential candidate, Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) and his
Gentile partner in crime Senator
John McCain (R-AZ).
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=706>
An Israeli journalist named Ari Shavit, lamenting the harsh treatments
that his government dishes out to the Palestinians, made the following
observation in Ha'aretz, a leading Israeli journal:
" We believe with absolute certitude that now, with the White House
and Senate in our hands along with the Pentagon and the New York
Times, the lives [of Arabs] do not count as much as our own. Their
blood does not count as much as our blood. We believe with absolute
certitude that now, when we have AIPAC [the Israel lobby] and [Edgar]
Bronfman and the Anti-Defamation League, , we truly have the right to
tell 400,000 people that in eight hours they must flee from their
homes. And that we have the right to rain bombs on their villages and
towns and populated areas. That we have the right to kill without any
guilt." 42 (emphasis added)
And this only scratches the surface of Zionist power! With such
awesome power to control and cover up events, is it any wonder why so
many of America's journalists and politicians are afraid to even talk
about this issue? Is it any wonder why former President Bill Clinton
would grovel before a jewish audience and say something as ridiculous
as the following statement:
"The Israelis know that if the Iraqi or the Iranian army came across
the Jordan River, I would personally grab a rifle, get in a ditch, and
fight and die." 43
I could go on and on at much greater length about this subject, but I
want to get back to the dancing Israelis. Have I made my point yet?
Subject: THE ZIONIST WHORE
From: "Rasputin" a.se...@worldnet.att.net
<mailto:a.se...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: 9/1/02 8:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:
<edBc9.46977$Ke2.3...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<mailto:edBc9.46977$Ke2.3...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>>
AMERICA BECOMES THE ZIONIST'S WHORE
We have reviewed how the Zionists used and discarded Germany. Then
they used and discarded Great Britain. After World War II, it was
clear that the chief remaining global power was the United States. Now
the USA had never had any problem with the Arab people, and had no
reason to quarrel with the Arabs.
For the Zionists to maintain and expand the support they were
receiving from America, it would benefit them greatly if the Arabs and
the mighty US could somehow become enemies. Could the Zionists
possibly stoop so low? Why not? Look at what they had already pulled
off! Remember that the official motto
of the Mossad (Israeli's intelligence organization) is "by way of
deception thou shalt do war." 26
In 1955, one of these "false flag" operations was publicly exposed for
the world to see. Israeli agents, impersonating Arab terrorists, were
caught staging a series of bombings against American installations in
Egypt. 27 When this conspiracy was exposed, it ultimately created such
a controversy that it brought down the Israeli government. The long
since forgotten scandal became known as "the Lavon Affair".
Then again during a 1967 war with the Arabs, Israeli gunboats and
fighter jets deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, an unarmed US
communications ship. 28 Thirty five American sailors were murdered and
170 others injured in a prolonged Israeli onslaught - carried out in
broad daylight and with the U.S. flag flying prominently. The intent
was to kill all of the Americans and then leave the Egyptians to take
the blame. Israel denied that the attack was deliberate but the
chilling stories of the lucky American survivors clearly contradicts
that lie. To this very day, the U.S. Congress has never investigated
the USS Liberty massacre.
In 1989, the Israelis once again succeeded in framing enemy Arabs in
order to enrage America. Former Mossad case officer Victor Ostrosvky
became so disgusted with the criminal behavior of his own government
that he defected from the Mossad and tried to warn America of just how
evil and dangerous
they were. Ostrosvky revealed exactly how the Israelis framed Libya
for the bombing of a German night club which killed American
servicemen. 29 It was this frame up job that caused President Reagan
to bomb Libya, killing the 4 year old daughter of Libyan leader Muamar
Qadaffi. France refused to allow
US bombers to fly over their air space and bomb Libya because French
intelligence knew that Libya was unjustly framed by the Israelis.
Among some of Ostrovosky's other amazing revelations are: that the
Mossad often uses Arab agents to carry out missions, that Israeli
agents are skilled at impersonating Arabs, that Mossad had a plan to
turn American public opinion against Iraq, and that wealthy Zionists
in America are often called upon to help carry out Mossad missions.
Ostrovsky, whose tell all book, By Way of
Deception, infuriated the Mossad and made him the target of numerous
death threats. 30
In 2001, the Washington Times ran a story about a 68 page research
paper issued by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS).
The research was compiled by 60 US Army officers as an attempt to
predict the possible outcomes of deploying a US force to maintain
peace between the Israel and
Palestinians. Here's what SAMS had to say about the Israeli military
machine:
"a 500 pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in
both Gaza and the West Bank. Known to disregard international law to
accomplish mission" 31
Of Israel's Mossad, the officers issued this warning:
"Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces
and make it look like a Palestinian Arab act." 32 (emphasis added)
Why does the US, which is trillions of dollars in debt, gives away
billons of taxpayer dollars to a foreign government whose military
violates international laws and whose Mossad is capable of murdering
US troops in order to frame Arabs? Have we lost our minds?
Subject: Bush Must Say 'No' To Israeli Nuclear Blackmail
From: xdange...@aol.com <mailto:xdange...@aol.com>
(XDangerousDNA)
Date: 9/20/02 4:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <20020920193931...@mb-mc.aol.com
<mailto:20020920193931...@mb-mc.aol.com>>
LaRouche Says: Bush Must Say 'No' To Israeli Nuclear Blackmail
Statement by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. September 18, 2002
Sept. 18 - I am warning President George W. Bush and European leaders:
If weapons inspectors return to Iraq and an otherwise-certain
Iraq-centered new Middle East war by the U.S. is thus averted, the
governments of the United States and Western Europe must be prepared
to forcefully intervene, to prevent an increasingly more desperate and
psychotic Ariel Sharon's nuclear-armed regime in Israel, the world's
third-ranking strategic nuclear-weapons power, from blowing up the
entire Middle East region, and beyond, with those weapons!
Therefore, I issued the following statement on behalf of my 2004
candidacy for the Democratic Presidential nomination.
At an international web cast, before a live audience in Washington on
Sept. 11, 2002, I identified three hurdles that had to be overcome to
avert an Iraq war that would trigger a perpetual "Clash of
Civilizations" religious conflict and a New Dark Age: First, the
United Nations Security Council had to become the venue for dealing
with the Iraq situation, and a reasonable resolution had to be
drafted, that would be agreed to by President Bush, overriding the
Sharon-influenced "war party" within his own Administration's senior
ranks. Second, the resolution had to be accepted by Iraq's Saddam
Hussein, as well as by President Bush. With those two conditions met,
LaRouche warned, the gravest, remaining danger to overcome would be a
berserker move by Sharon in Israel to sabotage the peaceful resolution
and blow up the region.
It was the threat of an Israeli nuclear attack on Iraq in 1991 that
blackmailed the first Bush Administration into launching Operation
Desert Storm. Today's Israel, under the insane Sharon regime, is the
only nation on Earth that genuinely fits the profile of a "rogue
state" armed to the teeth with "weapons of mass destruction." Israel
has the third largest nuclear weapons arsenal on Earth, and a triad of
submarine, missile, and bomber delivery systems, capable of
obliterating the entire Persian Gulf. Israeli scientists have recently
threatened that they now have the capability of launching an
intercontinental ballistic missile, meaning that no place on
Earth-including the United States-is exempt from an Israeli
preemptive nuclear attack. LaRouche asks you: Do you dare dismiss this
threat from Sharon?...
Since the 1956 attack on Egypt by Britain, France, and Israel, until
the 1989-1991 break-up of Soviet power, Israel's access to nuclear
weapons had made it the third "tilt" power in the global strategic
equation.
Already in 1956, it took an experienced military man, President Dwight
Eisenhower, to force Israel to back down from the Suez invasion, after
both Britain and France had withdrawn under American pressure.
Eisenhower not only threatened to cut off all U.S. military and
civilian aid to Israel; he also threatened to remove the tax-exempt
status of all American organizations that provided aid to Israel. An
even more resolute action will now be required from a far-less
qualified President George W. Bush, to stop Sharon from carrying out
either a false-flag "Islamist" terrorist attack against an American
target, or a nuclear attack on Iraq or Iran. This is deadly serious
stuff, and your personal involvement in the effort to stop it is
vital.
Are you prepared to have the Sharon regime in Israel once again
blackmail an American President into starting a war in the Persian
Gulf, out of fear of an Israeli weapons of mass destruction attack on
Baghdad? Do you have any idea what the consequences will be for the
U.S. and world economy, if a new Persian Gulf War, costing American
taxpayers between $2-3 trillion, is launched today, under the current
conditions of a collapsing U.S. economy and a thoroughly bankrupt
world financial system?
I warned that the toleration for the swamp of Sharon agents inside the
Bush Administration, is another grave impediment to the President
taking the urgently required action, in concert with our European
allies and Russia, to stop Sharon from provoking this perpetual war.
In a recent mass-circulation LaRouche in 2004 release, "The Pollard
Affair Never Ended," I named the names of the leading Sharonists
inside the Bush Pentagon and State Department-Paul Wolfowitz, Richard
Perle, Doug Feith, David Wurmser-some of whom literally prepared the
foreign policy doctrine of perpetual war for then-Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in July 1996. These Netanyahu-Sharon Likud
moles inside the Bush foreign policy and national security
establishment are still suspected, now with more and more evidence of
involvement with the convicted Israeli spy, the American-born Jonathan
Pollard.
Since the release and circulation of a million copies of the "Pollard
Affair Never Ended" campaign document, new, even more damning evidence
has surfaced. Therefore, I must intensify my demand for a thorough
national security investigation into key staffers in the Office of
Vice President Dick Cheney, beginning with his chief of staff and
national security advisor, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.
Libby, a protégé of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz for the
past 30 years, has assembled a "shadow national security council" in
the Vice President's Office, which has protected the Israeli agents
nest inside the Pentagon and State Department-and blocked an urgently
needed purge of these Likudniks. Libby has his own longstanding deep
ties to the Sharon circles, including to the Pollard spy ring.
While out of government, Libby served between 1985-2000 as the
personal attorney for fugitive swindler Marc Rich. Rich was indicted
by the U.S. Justice Department in 1983 for tax evasion and for trading
with the enemy, and he fled the United States, establishing a
luxurious hide-away in Zug, Switzerland.
Today, according to Israeli sources, Rich is under investigation, for
illegal contributions to Ariel Sharon's last political campaign. He
has been involved in Russian Mafia operations in Africa, and, through
his Marc Rich Foundation in Israel, has openly financed international
operations of the Israeli Mossad. Libby's law partner and mentor,
Leonard Garment, was a pivotal player in the Israeli government's
damage control effort, following the Pollard arrest in November 1985,
and he served as the attorney for Israeli Air Force Col. Aviem Sella,
the man who recruited and deployed Jonathan Pollard.
Now, Ariel Sharon's regime is Hell-bent on provoking a regional war in
the Middle East, a war pivoted on an Israeli pre-emptive attack on
Iraq. The threat is that, if President Bush does not virtually
exterminate Iraq, and neighboring countries, too, Israel will. This
means the likely use of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. All
the while, Sharon's Washington moles are operating under the shadows
of the Vice President and the Secretary of Defense of the United
States. If Sharon is to be stopped from launching World War III in the
Middle East, this entire Pollard stay-behind apparatus must be
thoroughly investigated, exposed, and removed from government-now! It
is time for these Israeli agents and spies to be kicked out of
government, and the Israeli government to desist from its nuclear
blackmail. I demand it. I can not believe that any sane and patriotic
American would not back me up "100%" on this specific issue.
Support me actively on this issue. If you are serious about the
security of our nation and its people, I should be able to count on
you.
<http://www.larouchein2004.net/pages/pressreleases/2002/020918isrblackmail>_
prt.htm
the following is the Israeli black propaganda article:
<http://www.mediamonitors.net/gillespie1.html>
Israel is the third largest arms dealer in the world. They have
violated hundreds of UN resolutions and they constitute a threat to
the entire Middle East, having occupied three countries, Syria
(www.ussliberty.org <http://www.ussliberty.org>) Lebanon, and
Palestine.
So, why not bomb Israel?
<http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=334318>
ISN'T IT INTERESTING HOW THE ABOVE ARTICLE BY FISK IS THE ONLY
PRESS/MEDIA THAT I HAVE SEEN SO FAR THAT MENTIONED THAT RITTER WAS
MAKING REGULAR TRIPS TO ISRAEL TO BRIEF THE ISRAELIS AS TO WHAT HE WAS
DOING WITH THE UNSCOM WEAPONS INSPECTIONS TEAMS IN IRAQ WHEN THEY WERE
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF RICHARD BUTLER. NO WONDER IRAQ WANTED THEM OUT
BACK IN 1998 AS I CAN EASILY UNDERSTAND SUCH (ESPECIALLY AFTER ISRAEL
HAD VIOLATED IRAQI SOVEREIGNTY WITH THE EARLIER BOMBING OF THE NUCLEAR
REACTOR).
I HOPE SUCH SPYING DOES NOT HAPPEN AGAIN IF PEACE IS GIVEN A CHANCE BY
aLLOWING WEAPONS INSPECTORS BACK INTO IRAQ... HOWEVER, I THINK THE
ONLY WAY TO PREVENT A US ZIONIST-DRIVEN INVASION WOULD BE TO FLOOD
BAHGDAD WITH US AND EUROPEAN PEACE ACTIVISTS... IRAQ COULD PUT THEM UP
FOR A YEAR TO LEARN ARABIC OR SIMILAR.
OUR BIASED PRO-ISRAEL MEDIA ONLY SOMETIMES MENTIONS SPYING BUT NOT
THAT IT WAS ISRAELI SPYING VIA UNSCOM... THE BRITISH PRESS/MEDIA
PROVIDES MUCH BETTER
COVERAGE...
Subject: ISRAEL SHOULD HAVE UN WEAPONS INSPECTIONS AS WELL MANY
AMERICANS ARE WAKING UP TO ISRAELI TREACHERY LIKE WITH THE USS LIBERTY
ATTACK IN WHICH ISRAEL MURDERED 34 SAILORS AND WOUNDED 171 MORE JUST
TO STEAL EVEN MORE LAND IN THE GOLAN IN SYRIA:
israel should be made to accept UN weapons inspections as well FOR ITS
NUKES AND CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS:..
Not In Our Name... <http://www.nion.us/> Petition against a war with
Iraq.
<http://www.itsforums.co.uk/zone0/viewforum.php?f=10>
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=668>
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=643>
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=706>
*us*
Bush and Cheney are still dancing on those graves.
*us*
or too hateful to be ethical or moral.
*us*
*us*
He has never been loyal to the USA.
Topaz
During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
because Germany was being bombed to rubble. There is no evidence that
the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:
"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians
would quarrel over just what happened"
The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan. The Germans planned to deport
the Jews out of Germany. The records show that they planned to move
them to Madagascar.
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absence
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
Professional holocaust believers have admitted that the "gas chamber"
which is shown to the tourists at Auschwitz was actually built by the
allies after the war was over. This is what they wrote:
Brian Harmon <har...@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%har...@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V are in
their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall...@erols.com> wrote in article
<8F4CB71B...@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully
admit that it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
They admit that the "gas chamber" shown to the tourists at Auschwitz
was built by the allies after the war was over. There is no physical
evidence that the Germans had gas chambers. No bodies of people who
died from gas have been found. The Communists were the first to enter
the camps. How do the other allies know the Communists didn't blow up
the buildings? Then they could claim that these demolished buildings
used to be gas chambers.
But then the believers will say the Germans confessed. Their main
confession is from Hoess. Here are the details:
"In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the
historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the
British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by
beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what
Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described.
In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of
Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three
days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture
Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions
of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to
Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face
four times to get Höess to reveal his true identity.
<quote>
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in
the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an
order signed by Höss.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his
body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where
it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off,
unless you want to take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over Höss and he was dragged to Clarke's car,
where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his
throat. Höss tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine."
For the first time Höss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I
took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you
are a soldier and we had to obey orders."
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow
was swirling
still, but the blanket was torn from Höss and he was made to walk
completely nude
through the prison yard to his cell.
</quote>
An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a
cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed,"
October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case
of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones:
<quote>
Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery
stationed at
Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us when he
refused to
cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He
came in the winter
of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls
Mr. Jones. Two
other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Höss in his cell
to help break
him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night and
day, armed with
axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to
help break down
his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When Höss was taken out for exercise
he was made
to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three
days and
nights without sleep, Höss finally broke down and made a full
confession to
the authorities.
</quote>
The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later
revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral
deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it
had been extracted from him by torture...
Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the
Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this
leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and
not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if
the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of
the smoke.
The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an
extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about
every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.
The real "holocaust" was when the Communist Jews murdered millions of
Christians. Communism was Jewish. Here is proof:
Article Winston Churchill wrote in 1920:
"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new.
From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down
to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany)
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the
basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible
equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to
exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the
actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)
Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and
His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941, translated by
Charles Malamuth.
In this book he told who the principle members of the October Central
Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik Party
during the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:
"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by
secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception
of the four who had received the largest number of votes. Lenin--133
out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky--131."
Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three were
known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile married to a Jewess. It
was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London Jewish
Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.
David Francis, the American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the
Revolution, wrote:
"The Bolshevic leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of
whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country
but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide
revolution."
The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
wrote this:
"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international
movement controlled by Jews."
In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the
Amerasia case they were:
Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at
one time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the
ringleader of the group arrested.
Andrew Roth, a Jew.
Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.
John Service, a gentile.
Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown
Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.
In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.
The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was Gerhart
Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist Party
in the U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.
In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film writers
of the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of Congress
and sentenced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of the ten
were communist party members and the other four were flagrantly
pro-communist.
One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis and
the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National Secretariat of
the American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two gentiles, three
nationality unknown.
Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was
convicted for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on
information obtained from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of
the ring. All of them were convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the
heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at
all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
The book "Soviet Russia and the Jews" by Gregor Aronson and published
by the American Jewish League Against Communism, quotes Stalin in an
interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Stalin said:
"...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the
Soviet Union. Active anti-Semites are punished by death under the
law."
The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from
the
U.S. Archives:
State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominent in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."
State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."
From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomery Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type" type."
A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here
were 384 'commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920 "In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the
membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews
comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population." (Stuart Kahan,
The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read
articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous
stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I
recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then
I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social
Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the
secretaries if the Trades Unions and the street agitators. Everywhere
the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the
row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellonbogen, and others. One
fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in
its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose
minor representatives I had been disputing for months past."
Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.
Here is something the National Socialists wrote:
"The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration."
*us*
He has never been loyal to the USA.
"Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth
about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would
be chased down in the streets and lynched."
-George H. W. "Poppy" Bush, spoken in an interview with
Sarah McClendon, June 1992
http://chicago.indymedia.org/newswire/display/61956/index.php
Topaz
repo
>
What do you think about all the terror attacks in
only two months? Horrible isn't it.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#attacks
8/9/2008 Pakistan Kurram 16 25 Sunnis ...
read more »
by James
*us*
Bush is a traitor.
*us*
Topaz
wrote:
>
>What do you think about all the terror attacks in
>only two months? Horrible isn't it.
>
America invaded Afganistan and Iraq. America is the terrorist.
America is ruled by the Jews.
"I ask you to consider the following:
Imagine if the rulers of a Mideast nation such as Syria, and I am not
simply speaking about a gang of radicals in that nation, but the
actual government ministers of this Mideast nation, launched terrorist
attacks against American civilian installations.
Imagine if the Syrian Government sent terrorists into Egypt to
firebomb American theaters and libraries and treacherously plotted to
blame the attacks on Egypt so that the United States would go to war
against that nation.
If successful, the treacherous plan would harm America even more than
the terrorist attacks themselves, because even more American blood and
treasure would be spilled in a devastating war on an innocent nation!
Imagine that the premature explosion of the one of the Syrian agent's
bombs led to the capture of all the Syrian operatives and ultimately
caused a complete exposure of Syria's terrorism against America.
In fact, imagine that the failed plot became so exposed that the
Syrian Defense minister had to resign.
How do you think the United States would respond to these acts of
terrorism committed against Americans by the Syrian government?
Would not at the very least America make military strikes at Syrian
installations?
Remember, that without Iraq committing even a single warlike act
against the United States, America invaded Iraq and spent hundreds of
billions of dollars and suffered great numbers of dead and wounded.
Again, how would America respond to any Mideast nation that clearly
made terrorist attacks against American civilian installations?
After such dastardly terrorist attacks would the American people send
billions of dollars in aid including military weapons to Syria?
After such attacks, how would every Congressman be viewed that took
money from Lobby organizations that support the Syrian government?
Would they not be attacked in the press, would they not be properly
accused of disloyalty to the United States, perhaps even treason?
Imagine that due to the ubiquitous pro-Syrian political and media
power in America that amazingly no actions were taken against Syria
and that military and other aid to Syria continued.
And finally, imagine that years after the attacks, the President of
Syria in an open, public ceremony gives awards to the Syrian
terrorists who bombed American installations and calls them "heroes."
Do you think a free press would keep such an obscene ceremony from the
knowledge of the American public? Or do you think that the Syrian
Government's praising of terrorists who attacked America would unleash
a huge scandal and uproar.
Well, everything I just described to you actually has happened, and I
mean in every detail.
Except it wasn't the Syrian government that launched terrorist attacks
on America, it was Israel.
In the Lavon Affair, the Israeli government sent terrorists to bomb
American installations in Egypt and blame the Egyptians for it. One of
their bombs exploded prematurely which led to the capture of one the
agents and eventually the rounding up of all of them. They confessed
and the Israeli Defense minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to resign
because of the failure and exposure of this Israeli treachery.
This is no fantasy; this is absolute historical fact which you can
verify from numerous major historical sources, including leading
Jewish sources.
Only thing is, you probably haven't even heard of it.
Why not?
And why would America continue to give military weapons and equipment
to a nation that launched terrorist attacks against us?
What does that tell you about Israeli influence over the American
government and the press?"
David Duke
www.davidduke.com
Topaz
br...@pobox.com
wrote:
More bullshit from the Waffen SS Brigade, Tinfoil Hat Division.
Topaz
"Holocaust revisionism, ie, the examination of the supposed
genociding of Jews in the Third Reich. The generally-accepted version
of this event -- or, more properly, this NON-event -- is what I call
the Orthodox Jewish Version of the Holocaust, or OJV for short, which
holds in its present version that the nazis killed 'six million' Jews
in 'gas chambers'. As it happens, however, there are numerous problems
with the OJV. The following is a list of the major ones.
* The 'evidence' for the OJV consists primarily of the records of the
court proceedings of the Nuremberg trials. As it happens, however,
vengeful Jews were largely in charge of these trials. (According to
Louis Marshalko in his book The World Conquerers, of the 3000 persons
on the trial staff, 2400 were Jews.) Adding to the problem was the
fact that (1) there was no historical precedent for war crimes trials
in which only the vanquished were called to account for their actions;
and (2) these trials violated the fundamental principle of fairness
that no one is to be tried for violating a law that was instituted 'ex
post facto', ie, after the crime was committed.
* 'Confessions' used in the trial were highly dubious, since many were
extracted by torture or or other unethical means, such as threatening
the families of the accused (According to British scholar Vivian Bird,
more than one hundred German defendants had their testicles beaten to
a pulp by 'interrogators'.) Two confessions were particularly
egregious: That of Rudolf Hoss, commandant of Auschwitz, which was
(among other things) written in a language he did not even understand,
and which provided the major basis for the 'six million' figure; and
that of Kurt Gerstein, the dubiousness of which was the subject of a
French doctoral dissertation.
* Many of the atrocities that were seriously alleged at the trials are
now rejected by even establishment historians as false, the most
prominent of which are the stories that Jewish bodies were made into
soap and their skin was made into lampshades. Evidently such stories
were created as war propaganda, just as were similar stories in WW1
about 'Huns' who were 'bayonetting babies'.
* The defendants in the trials had no opportunity to gather evidence
in their defense, and in addition were often given poor food,
subjected to freezing weather without proper clothing, deprived of
sleep, and -- as stated earlier -- often brutally beaten. Furthermore,
those who were condemned to death had their sentences postponed until
they could be carried out on the Jewish High Holy Days in a sort of
'blood libel' celebration.
* The printed trial transcripts often do not match the trial
recordings, and were evidently deliberately changed to cover up
embarrassing facts brought out by defendants in their trials.
* Auschwitz was not a 'death camp', as alleged at the trials, but a
large industrial complex in Poland, and the inmates were forced
laborers. The nazis were desperate for labor, so it would have been
irrational for them to have 'gassed' anyone, and equally irrational
for them to have mistreated inmates or underfed them. In fact, there
was a special court, under SS Judge Konrad Morgen, to try complaints
against camp personnel for abusing inmates. Beyond this, Heinrich
Himmler, who held principal authority over the camps, sent a memo to
all camp commandants stating that inmate deaths must be reduced 'at
all costs' -- hardly something one would expect to find in a 'death
camp'. And while it was alleged at the trials that 4 million Jews were
'gassed' at Auschwitz, the German camp records were not admitted into
evidence, and would probably have vindicated many of the defendants if
they had been. In particular, the Auschwitz death books, which were
released by the Russian government about a decade ago, show that only
about 74,000 people died at Auschwitz in all the years of its
operation, most from typhus, with only about 30,000 of them being
Jews. Furthermore, the crematoria were intended not for the 'killing
of Jews', but rather for the sanitary disposal of the bodies of those
who died from typhus.
* While there were Allied spies in most camps reporting on camp
conditions by radio, none of these spies ever made a report about mass
killings or 'gas chambers'. The idea of 'gas chambers' evidently arose
from the fact that all the clothes of arriving inmates were
disinfected in a kind of gas chamber in which Zyklon B was used to
kill lice which were feared as disease vectors (Lousy Jews?). These
delousing chambers, it should be noted, were far too small for killing
people, particularly in the numbers posited by the OJV. It should also
be noted that Zyklon B, the form of cyanide supposedly used to kill
Jews, was in fact a special form of slow- release cyanide which was
appropriate for de-lousing clothing, but inappropriate for the
instantaneous killing that was supposedly done in the "gas chambers".
(The irony of Germans being accused of killing Jews by an instrument
which they (Germans) used for preserving Jewish lives should not go
unnoticed.) In addition, as revisionists have noted, such killings
would have been impossible on the scale claimed by the OJV because
cyanide is so dangerous that the bodies would have had to lie for
hours before they could be safely removed, even by those wearing
protective clothing and gas masks. Beyond this, cyanide gas is
explosive, so that any little spark, as from the friction of shoes on
the floor, or any flame, as from a cigaret, would have caused any 'gas
chamber' to be transported to the place where it was supposedly
sending Jews.
* Revisionists have proved that the rooms alleged to be 'gas chambers'
could not possibly have served this purpose. The first investigation
of this problem was done not for the Nuremberg trials, but rather many
years later by Fred Leuchter, an American engineer and execution
expert, who took samples from the walls of supposed 'gas chambers' at
several camps and found that there was essentially no cyanide residue
-- an impossibility if the rooms had been used as alleged. (Altho
Leuchter's work was flawed, his conclusions have been confirmed
independently by two other experts, Walter Luftl and Germar Rudolf.)
Other problems posed for the OJV by the alleged 'gas chambers' involve
such things as no air circulatory system for dispersing or ventilating
the gas, no means for heating the Zyklon B discs for proper dispersal,
the fact that the doors of the 'gas chambers' opened from the INSIDE,
and that Allied aerial photographs of Auschwitz during the war showed
no holes in the roof of the supposed 'gas chambers' which would have
allowed the introduction of Zyklon B -- a point made by Holocaust
revisionists in their oft-repeated challenge, "No holes; no
Holocaust!"
* There is no good evidence that nazi references to the 'final
solution to the Jewish question' referred to anything other than
removal of Jews from the area of the Third Reich, the (false)
allegations about the Wansee Conference notwithstanding. In
particular, no 'Hitler order' (or order from anyone else) has ever
been discovered, in spite of the known German propensity for extensive
record-keeping, altho there is an internal memo of a phone
conversation with Hitler signed by Hans Lemmerer of the Ministry of
the Interior showing that Hitler wanted the solution of the Jewish
problem SHELVED until the end of the war. Beyond this, the nazis
actually cooperated with the Zionists under the so-called Transfer
Agreement ("Ha'avara") to train Jews for settlement in Palestine, and
the training camps for Zionists were the only places in nazi Germany
in which the flag of the Zionist state was allowed to fly.
* Jewish population numbers published in standard reference works both
before and after the war do not show a decrease of Jewish numbers, but
rather an INCREASE. These reference works also demonstrate that THERE
WERE NOT EVEN SIX MILLION JEWS IN NAZI-OCCUPIED EUROPE
DURING THE PERIOD.
* The 'six million' is a mystical number derived from Jewish
scripture, and in particular is the number of Jews who are said to be
required to die before Israel can be re-established. This accounts for
why "New York governor Martin Glynn, in a major Albany speech in
October 1919 [that's TWENTY YEARS BEFORE THE START OF
WORLD WAR TWO, for all you who are a tad weak on dates], reported at
length on the 'holocaust [of] six million Jewish men and women' who
were dying due to the 'awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for
Jewish blood' during the 'Great War'" (Irena Zdiarska, "Holocaust Is
Undeniable -- But Should Be Debated", Barnes Review Oct 94: 27)). It
also accounts for the fact that, in spite of the formal reduction from
4 to 1.1 million of the number of Jews claimed to have been killed at
Auschwitz (see pix of Auschwitz plaques below), the 'six million'
number has never changed, and thus that in the Orwellian Kabbalistic
mathematics on which it is based, six minus three still equals six.
* The OJV has changed significantly over the years. We have already
mentioned that the 'soap' and 'lampshade' allegations are now rejected
by even establishment historians, altho this does not keep Jews from
continuing to hold burial ceremonies for newly-discovered bars of old
Reich soap (we don't know whether they have also done the same for
lampshades.) Another feature of the original OJV that has now changed
was the allegation that Jews were exterminated at the camps in Germany
as well as Poland -- an allegation which has been abandoned for some
time. Yet another abandoned allegation is that mass killings were
carried out by means of steam, electricity, gas vans (using the
exhaust), and burning in pits; and in fact, the Holocaust received its
name from the latter allegation -- yet another irony of this congeries
of lies.
* The one thing which has done most to convince people that the
allegations of German atrocities are true is the film clips we have
all seen of the liberation of the concentration camps, in which bodies
are shown piled high, and surviving inmates are seen to be little more
than walking skeletons. But in fact these admittedly-shocking films do
not make a case for German atrocities, and in fact actually refute the
notion of "gas chambers": If Germans were gassing Jews by the
millions, as the OJV alleges, then Jews simply would not be around
long enuf to starve, as the "walking skeletons" and emaciated bodies
of the dead obviously were doing. The starvation, it should be noted,
was simply a reflection of the fact that, toward the end of the war,
the German supply lines had broken down, and food was not getting to
the camps. And above all, one should not think that there is anything
unique to Germany about "walking skeletons" in "concentration camps":
Exactly the same thing happened at the Andersonville prison during the
American Civil War, and the nearby photo is a picture of one of those
inmates.
* If there is any one thing which is a clinching argument to the
matter of the OJV, it is the fact that it is illegal to openly express
doubt about this story in most countries of the Western world,
including Germany (of course!), Israel (of course!), Austria (of
course!), Spain, France, Australia, and Canada; and in those few
countries in which it is not illegal, the laws forbidding 'race hate'
are increasingly being interpreted as forbidding such expression. The
point here is that fact does not require the support of legislation --
only falsehood does. And of course it does not take a rocket scientist
to figure who is behind this illegalization; nor does it take a rocket
scientist to figure why cases of 'Holocaust denial' are so vigorously
prosecuted: Jews, and particularly Israel, have profited in numerous
ways and by billions of dollars in playing this scam, including an
unending number of Holocaust movies (more than 400 at last count,
according to scholar Michael Hoffman), Holocaust museums (popping up
everywhere), Holocaust books (Elie 'The Weasel' Wiesel has written
more than 30; The Diary of Anne Frank is a perennial best- seller,
etc, etc, etc), TV dramas (the airing of "Holocaust' in 1970 is when
the scam really took off), 'survivors' by the millions -- all
pensioned by the German government, shakedowns of companies which
supposedly profited from 'slave labor' or were otherwise tinged by
Third- Reich-related activities (eg, IBM, Swiss banks), and of course
the billions in 'reparations', 'foreign aid' and other 'guilt money'
showered on Israel by Germany and the US. It has gotten so bad that
Jewish Professor Norman Finkelstein calls it "The Holocaust Industry"
in
his book by the same name, where he quotes his mother as asking, "If
Hitler killed so many Jews, then where did all the 'survivors' come
from?" No need to explain, then, why there is a saying among Jews that
"There's no business like Shoah (Holocaust) business."
* The only facts that come within even a country mile of supporting
the contention of nazi extermination of Jews are reports of the
shootings on the Eastern front of communist partisans, many of whom
were Jews. The following is what Lawrence Nevers has had to say on the
subject:
continued"
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-HoloRev.html
*us*
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
Bush lies kill GIs.
*us*
Bush is a traitor.
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
The bushworshipper isn't loyal to the USA, either.
Topaz
Auschwitz: Myths and facts
by Mark Weber
Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime
concentration camp where many prisoners-most of them Jewish-were
reportedly exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz is
widely regarded as the most terrible Nazi extermination center. The
camp's horrific reputation cannot, however, be reconciled with the
facts.
Scholars challenge Holocaust story
Astonishing as it may seem, more and more historians and engineers
have been challenging the widely accepted Auschwitz story. These
"revisionist" scholars do not dispute the fact that large numbers of
Jews were deported to the camp, or that many died there, particularly
of typhus and other diseases. But the compelling evidence they present
shows that Auschwitz was not an extermination center and that the
story of mass killings in "gas chambers" is a myth.
The Auschwitz camps
The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now
south-central Poland. Large numbers of Jews were deported there
between 1942 and mid-1944.
The main camp was known as Auschwitz I. Birkenau, or Auschwitz II, was
supposedly the main extermination center, and Monowitz, or Auschwitz
III, was a large industrial center where gasoline was produced from
coal. In addition there were dozens of smaller satellite camps devoted
to the war economy.
Four million victims?
At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans
exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. This figure, which was
invented by the Soviets, was uncritically accepted for many years. It
often appeared in major American newspapers and magazines, for
example. (note 1)
Today no reputable historian, not even those who generally accept the
extermination story, believes this figure. Israeli Holocaust historian
Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it is time to finally acknowledge the
familiar four million figure is a deliberate myth. In July 1990 the
Auschwitz State Museum in Poland, along with Israel's Yad Vashem
Holocaust Center, suddenly announced that altogether perhaps one
million people (both Jews and non-Jews) died there. Neither
institution would say how many of these people were killed, nor were
any estimates given of the numbers of those supposedly gassed. (note
2) One prominent Holocaust historian, Gerald Reitlinger, has estimated
that perhaps 700,000 or so Jews perished at Auschwitz. More recently,
Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac has estimated that about
800,000 persons-of whom 630,000 were Jewish-perished at Auschwitz.
While even such lower figures are incorrect, they show how the
Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years. (note 3)
Bizarre tales
At one time it was seriously claimed that Jews were systematically
electrocuted at Auschwitz. American newspapers, citing a Soviet
eyewitness report from liberated Auschwitz, told readers in February
1945 that the methodical Germans had killed Jews there using an
"electric conveyor belt on which hundreds of persons could be
electrocuted simultaneously [and] then moved on into furnaces. They
were burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby cabbage
fields." (note 4)
And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson
charged that the Germans used a "newly invented" device to
instantaneously "vaporize" 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz "in such a way
that there was no trace left of them." (note 5) No reputable historian
now accepts either of these fanciful tales.
The Höss 'confession'
A key Holocaust document is the "confession" of former Auschwitz
commandant Rudolf Höss of April 5, 1946, which was submitted by the
U.S. prosecution at the main Nuremberg trial. (note 6)
Although it is still widely cited as solid proof for the Auschwitz
extermination story, it is actually a false statement that was
obtained by torture.
Many years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant
Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers
tortured the former commandant to obtain his "confession." Höss
himself privately explained his ordeal in these words: "Certainly, I
signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could
just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are
certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is
true or not." (note 7)
Even historians who generally accept the Holocaust extermination story
now acknowledge that many of the specific statements made in the Höss
"affidavit" are simply not true. For one thing, no serious scholar now
claims that anything like two and a half or three million people
perished in Auschwitz.
The Höss "affidavit" further alleges that Jews were already being
exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 at three other camps:
Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolzek" camp mentioned by Höss is a
total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer
mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, the story these days by
those who believe in the Holocaust legend is that gassings of Jews did
not begin at Auschwitz, Treblinka, or Belzec until sometime in 1942.
No documentary evidence
Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were
confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a
policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story
cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence.
Many Jewish inmates unable to work
For example, it is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were
unable to work were immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young,
sick, or weak were supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who
could be worked to death were temporarily kept alive.
But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the
Jewish inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not
killed. For example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4,
1943, from the chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS
Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of
25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and
that all of the remaining Jewish inmates-some 21,500, or about 86
percent-were unable to work. (note 8)
This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on
"security measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS
concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl reported
that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp
complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the
Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination
center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom
"approximately 15,000 are unable to work." (note 9)
These two documents simply cannot be reconciled with the Auschwitz
extermination story.
The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily
as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and
elderly, as well as for those who were temporarily awaiting assignment
to other camps. That's the considered view of Dr. Arthur Butz of
Northwestern University, who also says that this was the reason for
the unusually high death rate there. (note 10)
Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish,
acknowledges in a recent book about the "final solution" that more
Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other "natural"
causes than were executed. (note 11)
Anne Frank
Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is known
around the world for her famous diary. But few people know that
thousands of Jews, including Anne and her father, Otto Frank,
"survived" Auschwitz.
The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the Netherlands
to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of
the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many other
Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March
1945.
Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp
hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews
who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January
1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in
Switzerland in 1980.
If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they
would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it was,
cannot be reconciled with the extermination story.
Allied propaganda
The Auschwitz gassing story is based in large part on the hearsay
statements of former Jewish inmates who did not personally see any
evidence of extermination. Their beliefs are understandable, because
rumors about gassings at Auschwitz were widespread.
Allied planes dropped large numbers of LEAFLETS , written in Polish
and German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed that
people were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing story,
which was an important part of the Allied wartime propaganda effort,
was also broadcast to Europe by Allied radio stations. (note 12)
Survivor testimony
Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of
extermination at Auschwitz.
An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp
experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was
interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations
with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy
woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at
Auschwitz.
Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go
into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The
terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then,
instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the
death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and
quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass
killings, gassings, or of any extermination program. (note 13)
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from
Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and
cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard
and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned
there. She heard the gassing stories only later. (note 14)
Inmates released
Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were released and
returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz had actually been a top
secret extermination center, the Germans would certainly not have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening in the camp. (note 15)
Himmler orders death rate reduced
In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially
typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm
counter-measures.
The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated
Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It
sharply criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and
ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to
significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps."
Furthermore, it ordered:
The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the
nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the
administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp
commandants . . . The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as
possible.
Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfhrer SS [Heinrich
Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced."
(note 16)
German camp regulations
Official German camp regulations make clear that Auschwitz was not an
extermination center. They ordered: (note 17)
New arrivals in the camp are to be given a thorough medical
examination, and if there is any doubt [about their health], they must
be sent to quarantine for observation.
Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp
physician. If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners to
a hospital for professional treatment.
The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the
preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply. Any
deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.
Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order
not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.
Prisoners who are to be released or transfered must first be brought
before the camp physician for medical examination.
Telltale aerial photos
Detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau
on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged
extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979. These
photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematory chimneys
or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly
alleged, and all of which would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz
had been the extermination center it is said to have been. (note 18)
Absurd cremation claims
Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could
not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and
summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.
For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in Calgary,
Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation
story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even
20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of
1944 in crematories and open pits is simply "preposterous" and "beyond
the realm of reality," he declared under oath. (note 19)
Gassing expert refutes extermination story
America's leading gas chamber expert, Boston engineer Fred A.
Leuchter, carefully examined the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland and
concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story is absurd and technically
impossible.
Leuchter is the foremost specialist on the design and installation of
gas chambers used in the United States to execute convicted criminals.
For example, he designed a gas chamber facility for the Missouri state
penitentiary.
In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of the
"gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland, which
are either still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn
testimony to a Toronto court and in a technical report, Leuchter
described every aspect of his investigation.
He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing
facilities could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among
other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were
not properly sealed or vented to kill human beings without also
killing German camp personnel. (note 20)
Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by
the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that
the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a
careful on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz,
Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: "I
have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully
killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider
it absolutely impossible." (note 21)
Topaz
by Theodore J. O'Keefe
Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.
At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying
inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising
stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by
showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers,
supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and
lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed
from dead inmates.
US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered
the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the
Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to
"document" what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen
and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while
the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for
posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of
horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown,
and Dachau and
Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American
populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history
of this planet.
For Americans, what was "discovered" at the camps -- the dead and the
diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of
torture and terror -- became the basis not simply of a transitory
propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the
Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas
chambers.
What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory
viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to "re-educate" the
German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a
united, independent national state, imposing in their place
overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence.
And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal
incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were
told about
Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the
Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most
authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the
human record.
A Different Reality
But it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the
camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the
camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching
military public information officers, government spokesmen,
politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.
When American and British forces overran western and central Germany
in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with
discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.
Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic
pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army's Judge Advocate
General's Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team,
Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German
camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim
work at Dachau, he was
questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors.
Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What
we've heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that
is a hoax." And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his
biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist
on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations,
confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered."
Typhus, Not Poison Gas
If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau,
Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or
deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as
well.
As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief
cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease,
above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until
recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together
in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had
broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in
Germany at war's end, where, despite such measures as systematic
delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the
virtual
collapse of Germany's food, transport, and public health systems led
to catastrophe.
Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and
mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D.,
Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the
Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in
Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in
concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus
infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes
for the outbreaks as follows:
Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an
astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that,
homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ...Germany was in
chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing
armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the
spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were
seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor,
housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere
lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring
such as few countries and few times have experienced.
Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a
psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with
British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who
volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn
oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that "Thousands of prisoners who
died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II
weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of
diseases."
Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited
stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue
after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously
maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed
each day.
Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to
the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy
of extermination through starvation in the German camps.
No 'Human Skin' Lampshades
What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for
their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other
artifacts? What of the innumerable "torture racks," "meathooks,"
whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are
reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and
even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their
way into the record at Nuremberg.
The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch,
dubbed by journalists the "Bitch of Buchenwald," who was reported to
have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned
hides of luckless inmates.
But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied
Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in
Washington: "There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch]
selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins
or that she possessed any articles made of human skin." In an
interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material
for the infamous lampshades: "Well, it turned out actually that it was
goat flesh. But
at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for
her to have gotten a fair trial." Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German
jail in 1967.
It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre
claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German
cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a
legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose
statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been
challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen
informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich
Himmler,
commander of Hitler's SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German
concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption
on the part of camp personnel. As he explained in sworn testimony at
Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more
than 200 convictions. Punishments included the death penalty for the
worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin
(Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse's husband), commandant of Buchenwald.
While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical
punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and
it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of
the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual
beating. After all, throughout most of the war the camps were
important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale
of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is
evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Glücks,
chief of the office that supervised the
concentration camps. It held the camp commanders "personally
responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical
strength of the detainees." Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly
ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the
worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the
guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same
stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many
villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and
fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many
political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with
Stalinist ruthlessness. Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon
W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances
in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to
their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their
commander, who wrote a preface to the report, "how the prisoners
themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror."
Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and
Communists as follows:
The trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist
Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They
could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death ... The
Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the
brutalities at Buchenwald.
Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military
government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an
article published in an American magazine shortly after the war.
Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators'
findings: "It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the
Communists ate; those who didn't starved to death."
Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by
Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and
Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of
Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino
Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau "the
prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities
on their fellow prisoners."
'Gas Chambers'
In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel
Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at
Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their
superiors at the headquarters of the US 6th Army Group, which
subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division.
While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been
published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of
Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to
characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a
"so-called lethal gas chamber," and to claim it was "allegedly used as
a lethal gas chamber." (Emphasis added)
Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its
effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the
confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports
of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting
a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the
German words for: "Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don't open!," was
identified as showing the murder weapon.
Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in
question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and
another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower
room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the
site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous
reports in the press as to the operation of this second "gas chamber,"
no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to
reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they
"dummies," or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory
has appreciable support in journalistic and
historiographical literature.)
As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps
liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of
propaganda about "gas chambers," "gas ovens," and the like, but so far
not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its
function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the
successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at
that time and today, has come to light.
Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly
decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany
after all. (We are now told that "gassing" and "extermination" camps
were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by
the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)
Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary
History, which is funded by the German government, stated
categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: "Neither
in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other
prisoners gassed." Professional "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal stated
in 1975 and again in 1993 that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil."
Dachau "gas chamber" No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and
grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the
modern Dachau "memorial site" in these words: "This gas chamber,
camouflaged as a shower room, was not used."
The Propaganda Intensifies
More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald
and other German camps, and trained American investigators established
the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in
Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media
in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images
annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust.
Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy,
no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating
defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and
bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration
camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers
continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the
camps.
Time for the Truth
It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal
the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time
they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they
didn't die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are
clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of
murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as
the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it
is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans,
eastern Europeans, the
Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and
Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their
supposed failure to stop it.
Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have
the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right
that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will
in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers,
Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right
and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that
are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in
determining America's foreign and educational policy, as well as its
selection of past events to be memorialized in our
civic life.
Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the
civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the
facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the
truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the
government of this country, and governments and international bodies
throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually
transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945,
so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry
out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the
granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace
based on justice.
Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth
about the wartime German concentration camps have since been
corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2.Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and
others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or
amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German
authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp
commanders and guards.
3.On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as
saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the
truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees
were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German
policy and German orders.
4.The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for
bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they
were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible
fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald
and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent
regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an
open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and
the
other camps captured by the Soviets.
Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659
*us*
Bush is a traitor.
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
The bushworshipper isn't loyal to the USA, either.
He hates Americans for their freedoms.
*us*
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
Bush lies kill GIs.
That's treason, by definition.
Topaz
Topaz
"There was a written order for the invasion
of the Soviet Union, a long and detailed order signed by Hitler
himself. It was labeled Directive 21--Operation Barbarossa. And there
were more directives as the war in Russia was raging. There was one
concerning the battle of Stalingrad. Hitler was fond of issuing
detailed orders to his armies, extending into both strategic and
tactical matters. You can find an English translation of Directive 21
at: http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1084/hitler_directives/dir21.htm
Now it's your turn. Show us one, just one, written order or
directive by Hitler relating to the murder of Jews. It doesn't have
to be detailed, just clear and unambiguous. Let's make it easier for
you. Just show us one, just one, order signed by anyone, of any rank,
in any position of authority, whether military or civilian, ordering
the gassing of Jews at any time, at any place, at any concentration
camp, in any country.
That should be pretty easy if indeed there was a Holocaust--if
indeed the Germans really did kill Jews by the hundreds of thousands.
Such a monstrous and wide-reaching program of mass murder simply could
not have been carried out without some written directions, without
some official orders passed down through the ranks, with multiple
copies to headquarters, without some reports passed back up the ranks
that the terrible orders had been successfully carried out. That's
the way military and civilian bureaucracies work--paper, paper,
paper--and the Germans were known to be meticulous record keepers. So
where, oh where, are all those documents on the ghastly gassings at
Auschwitz, Treblinka, Chelmno, Sobibor, Belzec, Mauthausen, and other
fabled "death camps?"
Morghus
Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:
"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians
would quarrel over just what happened"
The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan. The Germans planned to deport
the Jews out of Germany. The records show that they planned to move
them to Madagascar.
charles bash
"their minds made up" and they become furious if the subject is brought
up "in polite company".It is not appropriate to API. In any way that I
can see.
There is a Holocaust Museum in Washington DC that has been open about 2
or 3 years. I might take that in some time and if there is occasion to
report on it.
C. Bash
*us*
Bush is a traitor.
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
The bushworshipper isn't loyal to the USA, either.
He hates Americans for their freedoms.
He despises democracy, too, of course.
*us*
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
Bush lies kill GIs.
That's treason, by definition.
There's no valid excuse for it.
Topaz
In both the two existing delousing chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau
Concentration Camp in Poland, there is irrefutable visual and forensic
evidence that zyclon B cyanide had been used to kill lice which
carried deadly typhus. The blue markings inside and outside through
twenty-six centimeters of brickwork are still there today sixty years
after the end of WWII.
In the alleged gas chambers there is NO visual or forensic evidence of
zyclon B cyanide ever being used.
There are also no airtight doors on any so-called "gas chambers".
They look like ordinary rooms.
Topaz
Filmed on location at the Auschwitz camp site in Poland, this stunning
video by Jewish-American investigator David Cole shows that the "gas
chamber" that has been displayed to hundreds of thousands of tourists
is actually a propaganda prop. Alicia, an official tour guide, assures
David Cole, on camera, that the "gas chamber" in the main camp that is
shown to visitors is in its original, unaltered state. Then Dr.
Franciszek Piper, head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum,
acknowledges to Cole that this "gas chamber" is actually a postwar
creation. This video also tackles other Holocaust claims, including
the "human soap" fable. Shows that fraudulent "proofs" of homicidal
gassings were produced after the end of World War II, and that
visitors to the Auschwitz camp site have been systematically deceived
for decades.
*us*
Bush is a traitor.
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
The bushworshipper isn't loyal to the USA, either.
He hates Americans for their freedoms.
He despises democracy, too, of course.
He can't be free or brave.
*us*
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
Bush lies kill GIs.
That's treason, by definition.
There's no valid excuse for it.
He should be tried for his war crimes.
Docky Wocky
" There are also no airtight doors on any so-called "gas chambers".
They look like ordinary rooms..."
_____________________________
German door craftsmanship.
German door craftsmanship...
*us*
>German door craftsmanship...
You must admire the Nazis to support Bush.
Topaz
"There is no factual evidence to support the claims of the Holocaust.
After the war ended, the first assertions made by the Holocaust
industry had nothing to do with homicidal gassings and in fact,
Winston Churchill in his six-volume history of World War II and Dwight
D. Eisenhower in his memoirs, made not a single reference to homicidal
gassing chambers. In addition, autopsies made by Allied medical
personnel at the camps found that the inmates died of disease and
absolutely not a single shred of physical or forensic evidence found
post war showed that anyone was ever "gassed."
There is no doubt that people died of Typhus, and the shaving of hair,
removal of clothes and showers was typical of a program of delousing
to promote prisoner health, while if killing was your goal they would
have no reason to follow the delousing procedures so common during the
war as they did. It just does not add up."
TH
Topaz
>
>You must admire the Nazis to support Bush.
Bush stated that we must "ensure that anti-Semitism" - that is,
any writings that Jews don't like - "is excluded from school
text books, official statements, official television programming
and official publications...." Thanks, G.W. It's good to know
what your priorities are. Can you imagine Bush or Powell or
Giuliani, as much as they hate free speech, ever calling for laws
to suppress criticism of White people or even of America? It's
not going to happen. Forget it. Yet, in the hushed tones usually
reserved for sacred words spoken in church, they piously intone
that words critical of Jews be eliminated or made illegal. They
intone these words at international conferences, paid for by you
the taxpayers, called into session specifically for the purpose
of ending criticism of Jews. How much more obvious does it have
to be, dear listeners? Powell and Bush and Giuliani have given us
such a crystal clear example of Jewish power over our "leaders"
that even the most dense should be able to 'get it.'
Do you think that the OSCE delegates were mainly concerned with
stopping physical attacks on Jews and not on suppressing freedom
of speech? Think again. The Dutch delegate to the conference,
Daan Everts, specifically cited "[racist] music [and] racist
slogans"-slogans! -- as 'problems' to be addressed by new
laws.
And Israel's chief representative at the conference, Avraham
Toledo, specifically called on member governments to make
'anti-Semitism' a criminal offense. That's where they are going
with this. It can't possibly be any more obvious. A more chilling
nightmare scenario could not have been penned by a science
fiction author characterizing the Jews as a parasitic alien
species who have invaded us and taken over the ruling class in
our societies, and who are slowly programming us to kill or
imprison any 'rebels' who question the new ruling class, worship
of which is gradually being introduced in our schools and
churches as a pseudo-religion to cement their power over us.
[ <http://tinyurl.com/etzr> ]
It's interesting that the Bush administration withdrew its
delegates from the UN-sponsored 'World Conference Against Racism'
held in South Africa in 2001 when it was discovered that Jews
would be criticized for their treatment of Palestinians there.
But they enthusiastically endorse-with the participation of
Powell, Giuliani, and even Bush himself-this conference in
Vienna in which the entire focus is criminalizing criticism of
Jews and Jews alone. Clearly, our captured rulers have no problem
with the concept of conferences on racism. But conferences that
criticize Jews, however mildly, are verboten. And conferences
that denounce critics of Jews and Israel are national and
international priorities. It's Jewish interests that are their
driving force at all places and at all times. Jewish interests.
Not American interests. Not White interests. Any people so
betrayed by its own alleged leaders will not long survive on
Earth.
On June 18th, Giuliani stated that when people characterize Jews
"in inhumane ways, and make salacious statements in parliaments
or the press" about Jews, they are "attacking the defining values
of our societies and our international institutions."
Just as he did in the United States a few years ago, Giuliani
went on to call for special punishment for anyone in Europe found
to have violated his proposed 'hate crime' laws, punishment far
more severe than for similar offenses when the motivation was not
found to be dislike of Jews. He specifically justified this
unequal punishment of those who criticize Jews on the basis that
crimes against Jews are "particularly heinous." Crimes against
Englishmen, crimes against Italians, crimes against Frenchmen,
crimes against Americans-well, they're just crimes. Crimes
against Jews require special punishment. They're "particularly
heinous." Conferences must be held and new laws must be passed.
Giuliani ...continues
as he tells us what the real function of law should be in a
'good' society of obedient goyim: "Yes, some will argue that hate
crimes need not be punished more harshly than similar crimes
committed for different reasons. But the fact is that extra
penalties are used throughout civilized legal systems - in Europe
as well as America - as a way to distinguish acts that are
particularly heinous. One of the functions of the law is to
teach, to draw lines between what's permissible and what's
forbidden."
[ <http://tinyurl.com/f7j3> ]
More chills for your spine, ladies and gentlemen. "...what's
permissible and what's forbidden" as defined by Rudy Giuliani and
his Jewish masters. We don't need Alfred Hitchcock or Stephen
King anymore, now that we've got Rudy and the Jews. Yes,
"...what's permissible and what's forbidden"-truth about the
Jewish criminal conspiracy that is destroying our race and
nations is forbidden. Freedom is forbidden. A free press is
forbidden. Jewish ascendancy in a society often ends this way...
Giuliani continues his sermon, letting us know that there can
only be one point of view and one sacred victim group in World
War II history: "Making sure their citizens have an honest
understanding of the Holocaust is vital, as revisionist
viewpoints put us at risk of a repetition of race-based genocide.
Schools must look at how they educate children regarding
tolerance and fairness. Universities, public officials,
advertisers and the news media should publicize the tremendous
contributions that Jews have made to European societies through
the years."
Giuliani states that his purpose with regard to the rising
awareness of Jewish power and Jewish crimes in Europe is to see
that this increased consciousness is 'turned around.' I quote
from his June 13 address at the State department after accepting
the OSCE 'commission': "Coming from New York City and having had
the experience of being mayor of the world's most diverse city,
you learn... the value of having a focus on hate crimes and hate
incidents.... And then focusing your attention on those places in
which you have to educate people or you have to deal with people
who are wrongdoers. And the fact that this organization is giving
attention to this at this level, I think is a very positive sign
that we will be able to deal with it at this stage and start to
turn it in the right direction."
[ <http://tinyurl.com/f7lu> ]
It's clear that Rudy Giuliani's political ambitions are far from
over. His brown-nosing of the Jews has reached a fever pitch. We
can expect the same from ambitious politicians like Hilary
Clinton and many others as 2004 approaches. Elections in the
United States have become more and more contests between cynical
lying hacks who compete for favorable media coverage by trying to
be more subservient to the Jews and to Israel than the next
cynical lying hack. This guarantees them good coverage and more
votes from the unthinking victims of media manipulation. The
Semitically Sycophantic rhetoric will be more heated than ever in
future elections, as it takes extreme statements to compete for
the Jews' favor with George W., who was willing to slaughter
Arabs and Americans by the thousands for them.
But, as the ambitions and the actions of the Jews become more
extreme, the awareness they are trying to suppress will start to
bloom all over Europe, all over North America, and everywhere
where they have set up their criminal conspiracy to harness our
people for their evil ends and to eventually eradicate our race
from the face of the Earth. That's the historical pattern. Jews
gain power in a society, abuse that power through arrogance and
hate, and eventually the oppressed people expel their oppressors.
But this time, the process is not limited to one country like
20th century Germany or 15th century Spain. The process is now
global. And, as we and the other peoples of the Earth realize
that our mutual needs for self-determination and for freedom from
Jewish domination coincide, the days of the Jewish cryptocracy
will be numbered.
Instead of a government that serves Jewish interests above all,
and serves other minority interests as long as they don't
conflict with Jewish interests, we must have a government that
serves White interests. Under such a government, our labor and
our tax dollars and our blood would be expended only when they
served future generations of Whites, not squandered on the
megalomaniac dreams of the self-Chosen or on breeding the biomass
that threatens to engulf us. The conferences we will convene will
hold lying White politicians like Rudy Giuliani to account, and
will focus on such issues as the genocides against Whites
committed by Jews in Europe during the last century, and on
righting wrongs like the sexual slavery of young White women and
girls being practiced now by Jewish criminal gangs in Israel and
elsewhere.
When we have a government which pursues White interests instead
of Jewish interests, we will be incomparably richer, incomparably
more secure, incomparably more technically advanced and powerful-and,
in terms of Nature's highest commandment, the protection
of our children and our posterity, incomparably more moral than
we are today
Topaz
"The orthodox holocaust story can not possibly be defended with
rational arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked
to believe in the fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing
factories which left no traces whatsoever - no documents, no bones, no
teeth, no ashes - nothing! We are further asked to believe that the
Allies, who had a large network of informers all over Europe and a spy
in the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the German
intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide until
the end of the war, for if they had known about the mass murder, they
would have acted to stop it. Finally, we are asked to believe that the
Jews in Poland, the epicentre of the holocaust, did not know anything
about the Auschwitz gas chambers as late as in August 1944, otherwise
the Jews from the Lodz ghetto would not have gone to Auschwitz
voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as related by Raul
Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (Die Vernichtung der
europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544).
As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western democracies" is
woefully unable to counter the revisionists with arguments, it resorts
to censorship and brute force in order to silence the dangerous
heretics. And the Jews are gradually transforming the holocaust into a
religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as Robert Faurisson
aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with scientific arguments.
Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monuments spreading like
mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples of the new
religion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as Elie
Wiesel are the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion,
we only have to quote Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy
mystery, the secret of which is limited to the circle of the
priesthood of survivors" (Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American
Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslated from the German). Another high
priest of the holocaust cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes even further:
"When each of us comes before the Six Million, we will be asked what
we did with our lives... I will say: I did not forget you" (Simon
Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1).
No critical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they are
a blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims of
persecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National
Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the
holocaust possible! In today's Germany, it is even considered
inadmissible to compare the holocaust with the atrocities of communist
tyrants such as Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is
regarded as a "relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime
in history.
French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long
and unspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film
is Shoa, the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by
Jews as a synonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that the
holocaust cult is to replace Christianity:
"If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, then
Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who
went to the end of the humanely endurable, where he endured the
cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human
suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared. (...)
In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from him.
(...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes,
Paris, December 1993, p. 132, 133.)
Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews do not believe in God any
more, but virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The
Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust to unite the
World's Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria and
persecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick together
will they be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust.
It goes without saying that very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace
the murky holocaust religion. While the overwhelming majority of
people in the West still believe that the official holocaust version
is essentially true (even if they suspect that the figures might me
somewhat inflated), they are thoroughly fed up with the eternal
lamentation about Jewish victims and Jewish suffering. They simply
don't want to hear it any more. In Germany, opinion polls showed that
a vast majority of the population was against the planned holocaust
monument in Berlin (which not a single major party, not a single
leading politician and not a single big newspaper dared to oppose).
Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundly disgusted with
the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the population, but they
cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because this would
shatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which they
own their careers and their wealth...
The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of Israel
At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country, but from
the military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its
neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the United
States. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to
seriously threaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked and
militarily annihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk a
confrontation with the USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can
certainly admire the bravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters
who are willing to sacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland
from the alien intruders, but realistically, they have no chance to
win. The Palestinians have stones and slings. The Israelis have
helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy helicopters and tanks with
stones and slings.
When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his weakest
spot. The weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust
lie to which it owes its existence. The revisionists can give the
adversaries of Israel and international Zionism a terrible weapon. It
is quite true that many revisionists are by no means guided by
political considerations. Some of them - Carlo Mattogno is a good
example - are only motivated by intellectual curiosity: They want to
ascertain what really happened to the Jews during the Second World
War. But even if revisionism is not a political movement, its
political implications are tremendous. The revisionists are
endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is the deadliest enemy
of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the revisionists objectively
work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively their goals are
often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition. This is,
of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books burnt in
more and more countries.
In view of the total Jewish media control and the ever-growing
anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is very
difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We
revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be
explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the
internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly improved
our possibilities to make the results of our research known to the
World, but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not
every citizen of the Western world who is informed about the
revisionist arguments will automatically become revisionist and
anti-Zionist. The average person in the West - and particularly in
Germany - has been so thoroughly brainwashed that a sudden exposure to
the truth can provoke a nervous breakdown or stomach cramps. I have
repeatedly witnessed this myself. Other people would gladly accept the
truth about the holocaust, but as they know that even the slightest
suspicion of revisionism leads to social ostracism, economic ruin and
legal persecution, they understandably prefer not to get involved.
However, if we want to win the war against those whom one of my
Russian friends called "the enemies of God and mankind"..
The logical consequence of all this is that those countries which are
authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed
Palestinian people should make the breakthrough of holocaust
revisionism their foremost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars,
yet one soldier can destroy it with a single missile. The revisionists
can provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a
thousand missiles can destroy."
*us*
Bush is a traitor.
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
The bushworshipper isn't loyal to the USA, either.
He hates Americans for their freedoms.
He despises democracy, too, of course.
He can't be free or brave.
He can only hate.
*us*
>German door craftsmanship...
You must admire the Nazis to support Bush.
He's the "Heir to the Holocaust", and only an
idiot believes his lies.
*us*
Bush is the "Heir to the Holocaust".
He has never been loyal to the USA.
Bush lies kill GIs.
That's treason, by definition.
There's no valid excuse for it.
He should be tried for his war crimes.
It'd restore the USA's credibility to turn him over.