IS THIS THE RETURN OF THE "(UN)FAIRNESS DOCTRINE?"
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
[link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio
Fairness Doctrine Watch: The FCC’s “Diversity Panel”
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/04/fairness-doctrine-watch-the-fccs-diversity-panel/
who are you?
> We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
> rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
> campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
> [link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
> impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio
>
>
would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!
Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas
Ron
.
.
Malkin, in her usual fashion, has failed to mention some recent items
regarding the Fairness Doctrine that she and other misinformed
Conservatives have harped on for so long.
From:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE7D9143EF932A25751C0A96F948260
February 11, 1989 - A Federal Court has upheld the repeal of the
Fairness Doctrine by the Federal Communications Commission.
and from:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/02/18/white-house-opposes-fairness-doctrine/
Wednesday, February 18, 2009 - President Obama opposes any move to
bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine, a spokesman
told FOXNews.com Wednesday.
Why does Malkin attempt to revive a non-relevant issue? She makes it
sound like the Fairness Doctrine will be re-instated next week. Is it
being done just to stir up doo-doo? I think it is.
RO
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
> Malkin, in her usual fashion, has failed to mention some recent items
> regarding the Fairness Doctrine that she and other misinformed
> Conservatives have harped on for so long.
>
>
> February 11, 1989 - A Federal Court has upheld the repeal of the
> Fairness Doctrine by the Federal Communications Commission.
>
>
> Wednesday, February 18, 2009 - President Obama opposes any move to
> bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine, a spokesman
> told FOXNews.com Wednesday.
>
> Why does Malkin attempt to revive a non-relevant issue? She makes it
> sound like the Fairness Doctrine will be re-instated next week. Is it
> being done just to stir up doo-doo? I think it is.
>
> RO
THE ABOVE IS ALL LIBERAL FASCIST PROPAGANDA LIES
The Neo-Commie unFairness Doctrine is very much alive! http://www.unfairair.org
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press..."
Government censorship has many disguises. By whatever name — “Equal
Time,” “Localism,” or the Orwellian “Fairness Doctrine,” — it is
censorship and un-American. Sadly, in the wake of the 2008 elections
and FCC changes, powerful politicians in Washington have become
emboldened to press for direct or creeping censorship of news and talk
radio.
DO NOT BECOME COMPLACENT - REJECT THE 0baMa0 LIBERAL FASCIST
PROPAGANDA LIES
On May 7, Obama’s FCC Chairman convened the first “Diversity
Committee” meeting. A dozen left-wing advocacy groups and politically
correct corporate flunkies are about to make federal policy on who
will be allowed to own a radio station. This is the first shot. We can
either duck and cover or we can fight back.
What Obama is doing is now in plain sight. FCC Chairman Copps:
“The sad truth is that the diversity of this great nation is not
reflected in the ownership of its media and telecommunications
facilities. The time has come to chart a new course, to roll up our
sleeves and get to work to craft sustainable solutions.”
Translation: If Obama can take over America’s largest banks, insurance
companies and auto makers, he can regulate a way to take over
America’s free media. And they are coming after radio first. We need
to see the specific tactic Obama will use through his FCC and majority
in Congress before we can target fire to stop it. But in the meantime,
we’ve got to keep recruiting an online army.
0baMa0 will purposefully legislate the radio industry into bankruptcy.
As with the banks, insurance companies and automobile companies, they
will then takeover every radio station in the U.S. Then they will set
their sites on the internet. Kiss your Free Speech goodbye! It will
be Liberal Fascist Propaganda 24 hours a day 7 days a week on every
media outlet everywhere.
FREEDOM ISN'T FREE - FIGHT BACK >>> http://www.unfairair.org
dave
ery
> media outlet everywhere.
>
The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
political atmosphere. Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
interest.
Newspapers can print whatever they like, because anybody can start a
newspaper. Spectrum is a finite commodity. They cannot be coralled and
used to further political objectives of the capital class to the
detriment of everyone else.
Telamon
<539161b9-b295-4709...@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
obamao.sux....@gmail.com wrote:
I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved down out
throats in the near future but it will be called something else.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
<72233803-eaa0-4b2a...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Ron <ron...@wt.net> wrote:
> On 9 May, 14:35, obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
> > We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
> > rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
> > campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
> > [link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
> > impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio
> >
> > Fairness Doctrine Watch: The FCC�s �Diversity Panel�
> >
> > http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/04/fairness-doctrine-watch-the-fccs...
> .
> .
> Malkin, in her usual fashion, has failed to mention some recent items
> regarding the Fairness Doctrine that she and other misinformed
> Conservatives have harped on for so long.
>
> From:
> http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE7D9143EF932A25751C0A96F948
> 260
>
> February 11, 1989 - A Federal Court has upheld the repeal of the
> Fairness Doctrine by the Federal Communications Commission.
I expect the left's continued attack on free speech rights to continue.
The "progressive" types will "craft" another bill by another name to
silence speech they don't like.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Ron
> On May 9, 4:34 pm, Ron <ron...@wt.net> wrote:
> > Malkin, in her usual fashion, has failed to mention some recent items
> > regarding the Fairness Doctrine that she and other misinformed
> > Conservatives have harped on for so long.
>
> > From:http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE7D9143EF932A25751...
>
> > February 11, 1989 - A Federal Court has upheld the repeal of the
> > Fairness Doctrine by the Federal Communications Commission.
>
> > and from:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/02/18/white-house-o...
>
> > Wednesday, February 18, 2009 - President Obama opposes any move to
> > bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine, a spokesman
> > told FOXNews.com Wednesday.
>
> > Why does Malkin attempt to revive a non-relevant issue? She makes it
> > sound like the Fairness Doctrine will be re-instated next week. Is it
> > being done just to stir up doo-doo? I think it is.
>
> > RO
>
> THE ABOVE IS ALL LIBERAL FASCIST PROPAGANDA LIES
>
> The Neo-Commie unFairness Doctrine is very much alive!http://www.unfairair.org
>
(SNIPPED)
Re: THE ABOVE IS ALL LIBERAL FASCIST PROPAGANDA LIES
Well, Poon Cheeks, if you want to insist that the earth is flat, then
have at it. But read the following
http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/fairness-the-fake-debate/
Someone needs to explain why it is that CONSERVATIVES CONTINUE TO
INSIST that liberals want to reinstitute the FCC’s 1949
Fairness Doctrine. While it is true that the old regulation is brought
up from time to time, IT HAS NO TRACTION IN EITHER THE
HOUSE OR SENATE. The administration is opposed to it. THE SUPREME
COURT WOULD RULE AGAINST IT. Still, conservative talk radio continues
to chant about the "Hush Rush Bill" as if it were a real threat that
has real backing. It isn’t, it doesn’t, and it’s not going to happen.
Nor will the sky fall.
Obama's opposition to re-instating the FD is well....legendary.
Notice the list of cites following this even includes one from Fox
News!
Get off the meds you are using and get a colon cleanse.
http://dailycensored.com/2009/02/21/obamas-opposition-to-the-fairness-doctrine-is-bad-news/
"This week the Obama administration made it clear that they had no
intention to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine."
********************************
http://www.iterasi.net/openviewer.aspx?sqrlitid=rjzrocl6_0cqw6xdhsy6qw
"The fairness doctrine, which was scrapped by the FCC as
unconstitutional in 1987,...."
********************************
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/174455-Obama_Restates_Opposition_to_Return_of_Fairness_Doctrine.php
"President Barack Obama has reiterated his opposition to reimposing
the Fairness Doctrine."
********************************
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/02/18/white-house-opposes-fairness-doctrine/
"A White House spokesman tells FOXNews.com President Obama opposes any
move to bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine."
********************************
http://24ahead.com/obama-reiterates-fairness-doctrine-opposition-concentrate-hi
"As the president stated during the campaign, he does not believe the
Fairness Doctrine should be reinstated."
and on and on....
RO
Genaro
> obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> ery
>
> > media outlet everywhere.
>
> The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
> political atmosphere. Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
> interest.
>
Then let the public decide what is in their best interest. Or would
you prefer a liberal administration, or any administration for that
matter, supersede the will of THE PEOPLE and do it for them?
Go ahead, keep pushing us around. GO AHEAD PUNK!
-------
> Newspapers can print whatever they like, because anybody can start a
> newspaper. Spectrum is a finite commodity. They cannot be coralled and
> used to further political objectives of the capital class to the
> detriment of everyone else.
-------
IOW, you don't give a shit about the will of THE PEOPLE of the United
States.
-------
Day Brown
> 0baMa0 will purposefully legislate the radio industry into bankruptcy.
> As with the banks, insurance companies and automobile companies, they
> will then takeover every radio station in the U.S. Then they will set
> their sites on the internet. Kiss your Free Speech goodbye! It will
> be Liberal Fascist Propaganda 24 hours a day 7 days a week on every
> media outlet everywhere.
>
> FREEDOM ISN'T FREE - FIGHT BACK >>> http://www.unfairair.org
incomes of newspapers, TV, and radio. Sure they can put ads on the web,
but who bothers looking at them? If you wanna buy something, and
actually have some money, you comparison shop.
Free speech has long been drowned out by paid for corporate speech. It
will be nice to see what citizens, like yourself, have to say for a change.
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
[ ASININE@address ] wrote:
> We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that
> matter, rather openly proclaimed since way back during the
> presidential campaign.
The SOONER the Fairness Doctrine is reinstated, the BETTER!
As I pointed out HERE:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:03:21 -0500,
"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" again PARROTED
more hateful and ignorant CRAP from the RRR Cult --
> Christian broadcasters...
TRANSLATION: RRR Cultic broadcasters. Who INSULT
Christianity every time they claim to be
Christian.
> ...have expressed concern that a revived "Fairness Doctrine"
> might force them to air anti-Christian responses to their programs.
TRANLATION: What they REALLY fear is that they might
be in the position of having their agendas
of hateful bigotry REFUTED and BALANCED
by the airing of equal-time broadcasting by
sensible, compassionate, and fair-minded
egalitarian who would EXPOSE the *ignor-
ance*, *vacuousness*, *speciousness*,
and *loathsomeness* of their hate-agendas.
> They also worry that proposed hate crimes laws -- such as the
> Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) --
BZzztttt!!! ENDA has absolutely NOTHING to do with the
proposed laws providing greater penalties for the commission
of hate-crimes.
(Thus, once AGAIN we see "IBen's" abject ignorance as
demonstrated by his propensity to PARROT mindless SWILL
generated by the hate-sites of the RRR Cult.)
The SOLE purpose of ENDA is to *prevent* any and all
future attempts to DISCRIMINATE against people in the workplace
(e.g., conditions, pay, hiring, and firing) of any person on the
specious basis of the TRIVIALITY of his/her sexual orientation.
Their opposition to the act is an overt PROMOTION of idiotic
and uncalled-for discrimination, and thus serves as clear PROOF
of the RRR Cultists' hatefulness. They have NOTHING to gain
by seeing discrimination ENDED!
> Before the November elections, Wright expressed doubt that
> Congress would revive the Fairness Doctrine. But he warned that
> it could happen if Democrats won both the White House and solid
> majorities in both houses of Congress. That is indeed what has
> happened.
Indeed!!! Thankfully!! And the SOONER they reinstate it,
the better
VIVA **fairness!!!**
VIVA the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE!!
-- (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <drivers...@ymail.com>
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com.com -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
http://spifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
<telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
> down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
> else.
CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.
**VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!
dave
> On May 9, 6:47 pm, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
>> The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
>> political atmosphere. Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
>> interest.
>>
> -------
> Then let the public decide what is in their best interest.
That is precisely why broadcast media needs to be more down the middle.
People cannot make informed decisions if all they hear is propaganda.
When I was a kid, EVERY radio station did regular newscasts, (at least
one an hour).
dave
> On Sat, 09 May 2009 15:57:53 -0700, Telamon
> <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
>> down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
>> else.
>
> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
>
> For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
>
applies to wireless broadcast, e.g. radio and TV stations..
Clave
"dave" <da...@dave.dave> wrote in message
news:mfKdnZm4LpeCupvX...@earthlink.com...
Hardly matters -- that's Rush's backyard and you know how the dittoheads
circle to protect their queen pig...
Jim
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
dave <da...@dave.dave> wrote:
> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
> <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>>> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
>>> down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
>>> else.
>> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
>> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
>>
>> For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
>> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
> Fox News is a cable channel. The ... fairness doctrine only
> applies to wireless broadcast, e.g. radio and TV stations.
If so, it needs to be modified to INCLUDE the other channels.
-- (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <drivers...@ymail.com>
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com.com -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
http://spifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
"Family" -- Key CODE WORD of the RRR Cult
Throughout the RRR Cult, "Family" is ALWAYS a code word
that translates to: "Anti-Personal-liberties."
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
> obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> ery
>
> > media outlet everywhere.
>
> The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
> political atmosphere. Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
> interest.
"Poisonous" as defined by whom? Little Liberal Fascist Diktators in
your local Hitlery "It Takes A Village"?
There is no better way to determine satisfaction of a licensees
obligation of serving the public than the Public actually listening.
Through which the radio station gains its Market Share Rating and
allows the station to make enough advertizing revenue to continue
opperating. If Free Market Capitalism (you and me consuming radio
product) is not allowed to operate than WHO/WHAT will decide which
stations continue to operate? A Politician? An 0baMa0 appointed
Liberal Fascist/Neo-Communist? Kiss your freedom goodbye. And
Dr.DaviD, you can kiss my ass!
> Newspapers can print whatever they like, because anybody can start a
> newspaper. Spectrum is a finite commodity. They cannot be coralled and
> used to further political objectives of the capital class to the
> detriment of everyone else.
Ah yes! A typical Liberal Fascist explaination. The "Capital Class".
As if that excludes everyone except rich as defined by 0baMaoists -
bwaHAHAHAHAHA!
Yes, Dr.DaviD - Heil 0baMao Hitler - our great leader will decide what
is good for every single individual Serf. FUCK OFF YOU LIL'NEO-COMMIE
IMBECILE!
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
FUCK OFF WITH YOUR NEO-COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA LIES
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
FUCK-OFF WITH YOUR LIBERAL FASCIST 0baMa0 PROPAGANDA LIES
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
dave
Dude! Try the decaf.
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
> Genaro wrote:
> > On May 9, 6:47 pm, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
> >> The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
> >> political atmosphere. Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
> >> interest.
>
> > -------
> > Then let the public decide what is in their best interest.
>
> That is precisely why broadcast media needs to be more down the middle.
Ja, let Heil 0baMa0 Hitler decide what is "down the middle" instead of
Free Market Consumers - (me and you)
> People cannot make informed decisions if all they hear is propaganda.
or go to public schools and be taught Liberal fascist Neo-Communist
PROPAGANDA LIES from K to PhD! Right IMBECILE Dr.DaviD,PhD?
> When I was a kid, EVERY radio station did regular newscasts, (at least
> one an hour).
Ooooh - Dr.DaviD can taste the Liberal Fascist power - HEIL HITLER!!!!
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
FUCK-OFF WITH YOUR LIBERAL FASCIST 0baMa0 PROPAGANDA LIES
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
FUCK-OFF WITH YOU LIL' LIBERAL FASCIST 0baMa0 IMBECILE!
who are you?
> In article <gu4p0c$jsp$1...@news.albasani.net>,
> who are you? <Bar...@one.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
>>
>> >
>> would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
>> over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
>
> Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.
>
> I think we should start with you.
Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed. The reason for the reinstatement is that
with all the rich republican'ts owning all the media outlets, fat dumb
sausage suckers (like Ru$h and Beck) spewing an acid bath of hate that is
being presented as the only fact.
Without the Fairness Doctrine, your only hearing one side of the issue...
Theirs! And, if your only hearing their side, it's probably NOT in your
favor.
Republican't attitude...
Fuck you! I'm right and you don't need to know more
~ RHF
> obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> ery
>
> > media outlet everywhere.
>
> The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
> political atmosphere. Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
> interest.
>
> Newspapers can print whatever they like, because anybody can start a
- They cannot be coralled and used to further
- political objectives of the capital class to the
- detriment of everyone else.
Dave -speaks-out-about- The Capital Class To The Detriment Of Everyone
Else
~ RHF
wrote:
> In article
> <72233803-eaa0-4b2a-a601-11524dffa...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Maybe a "No Hate Speech Doctrine" Bill which
would result in the only persons you would be
able to say anything nasty about would be :
White Straight Males and Christians. Everyone
else would be in a 'Protected Class' : Violators
would be removed-banned from the Air-Waves
and could be Fined a Years Salary and also
get a Year in Jail. Say anything Negative about
Disrespecting Prez Obama of the US Congress
would also be a reason to remove-ban someone
from the Air-Waves.
change you can fear ~ RHF
.
Telamon
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 May 2009 15:57:53 -0700, Telamon
> <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> > I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
> > down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
> > else.
>
> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
Here is a clue for you retard "now open wide."
> For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
You are abusing a public news group right now retard.
> ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
> issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
> opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.
All retards like you should be locked up.
> **VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!
**VIVA** the retard doctrine.
> -- (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <drivers...@ymail.com>
retard extraordinaire.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
< SNIP >
> TRANSLATION:
< SNIP >
Your translator is broken retard.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
who are you?
> On May 9, 1:27 pm, who are you? <Bar...@one.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
>> > We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that
>> > matter, rather openly proclaimed since way back during the
>> > presidential campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some
>> > time and here [link below] is her latest (with some good links) on
>> > what may be an impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg,
>> > WGN Radio
>>
>> would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
>> over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
>>
>> Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!
>>
>> Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
>> lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas
>
> WAY - Speaking of 'childish name calling' * 'lemmings'
> * 'Ru$h LimpBalls'
>
<sigh> I was doing my part to communicate with your type :-)
who are you?
> In article <gu5jpm$hqe$1...@news.albasani.net>,
> who are you? <Bar...@one.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:
>>
>> > In article <gu4p0c$jsp$1...@news.albasani.net>,
>> > who are you? <Bar...@one.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party
>> >> has over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
>> >
>> > Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.
>> >
>> > I think we should start with you.
>>
>> Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
>> Fairness Doctrine was repealed.
>
> < SNIP >
>
> Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
> remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
> was enforced.
<snip unrelated biased opinion>
O yea?!
early in mass coommmunications, Talkshows and call-ins were rare but
viewpoint programs were not. In radio and TV, there were people with
timers to make sure different viewpoints were equally represented, at
least by equality in time. Perhaps there were mistakes by not having a
fully qualified guest making the response for one side or another but
never-the-less, there WAS a response and the audience was not left with
the impression that the host of the "show" was "the authority".
What we have today are groups of people who follow what they like to hear
and believe as fact, most anything said by the program moderator. There
is little if no confirmation of facts and the program host will let the
audience conjecture bogus attitudes on a subject or person when the basis
of the subject is truly unfounded.
With a fairness doctrine, no individual will loose any civil rights.
If you feel differently, please explain.
The only people I feel will loose (financially but not civilly) are the
corporations who own all the media outlets. Their gain (by keeping the
public in the dark) is simply your lose to make educated opinion or
judgment.
dave
> On May 9, 7:58 pm, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
>
>>> Then let the public decide what is in their best interest.
>> That is precisely why broadcast media needs to be more down the middle.
>
> Ja, let Heil 0baMa0 Hitler decide what is "down the middle" instead of
> Free Market Consumers - (me and you)
There are no "free markets". Consumerism is the opposite of freedom.
dave
You are a tool. If you aren't part of the solution you are the problem.
Get out of the way or you will be run over.
m II
> You are a tool. If you aren't part of the solution you are the problem.
If you aren't part of the solution, you're precipitate...
mike
--
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/ /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /
/ /\ \/ /\'Think tanks cleaned cheap' /\ \/ /
/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/
Densa International©
For the OTHER two percent.
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
I block all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail,
Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
I also filter everything from a .cn server.
For solutions which may work for you, please check:
http://improve-usenet.org/
dave
> dave wrote:
>
>> You are a tool. If you aren't part of the solution you are the problem.
>
>
>
> If you aren't part of the solution, you're precipitate...
>
>
>
>
> mike
>
>
>
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
<telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
> down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
> else.
CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.
**VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!
-- (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <drivers...@ymail.com>
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com.com -- Unemployment Solution!
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
[ ASININE@address ] wrote:
> We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that
> matter, rather openly proclaimed since way back during the
> presidential campaign.
The SOONER the Fairness Doctrine is reinstated, the BETTER!
As I pointed out HERE:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:03:21 -0500,
"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" again PARROTED
more hateful and ignorant CRAP from the RRR Cult --
> Christian broadcasters...
TRANSLATION: RRR Cultic broadcasters. Who INSULT
Christianity every time they claim to be
Christian.
> ...have expressed concern that a revived "Fairness Doctrine"
> might force them to air anti-Christian responses to their programs.
TRANLATION: What they REALLY fear is that they might
be in the position of having their agendas
of hateful bigotry REFUTED and BALANCED
by the airing of equal-time broadcasting by
sensible, compassionate, and fair-minded
egalitarian who would EXPOSE the *ignor-
ance*, *vacuousness*, *speciousness*,
and *loathsomeness* of their hate-agendas.
> They also worry that proposed hate crimes laws -- such as the
> Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) --
BZzztttt!!! ENDA has absolutely NOTHING to do with the
proposed laws providing greater penalties for the commission
of hate-crimes.
(Thus, once AGAIN we see "IBen's" abject ignorance as
demonstrated by his propensity to PARROT mindless SWILL
generated by the hate-sites of the RRR Cult.)
The SOLE purpose of ENDA is to *prevent* any and all
future attempts to DISCRIMINATE against people in the workplace
(e.g., conditions, pay, hiring, and firing) of any person on the
specious basis of the TRIVIALITY of his/her sexual orientation.
Their opposition to the act is an overt PROMOTION of idiotic
and uncalled-for discrimination, and thus serves as clear PROOF
of the RRR Cultists' hatefulness. They have NOTHING to gain
by seeing discrimination ENDED!
> Before the November elections, Wright expressed doubt that
> Congress would revive the Fairness Doctrine. But he warned that
> it could happen if Democrats won both the White House and solid
> majorities in both houses of Congress. That is indeed what has
> happened.
Indeed!!! Thankfully!! And the SOONER they reinstate it,
the better
VIVA **fairness!!!**
VIVA the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE!!
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
[ IDIOTIC@E-mail address ] wrote:
> F...
<flush idiocy>
Dear:
[] sir [] madam [X] lamer [X] loser [X] bigot [X] troll
You:
[X] posted self-righteous material
[X] posted mean-spiritedness
X[] shouted (i.e., capitalized) whole sentences
[X] immaturely posted a bunch of swear words
[] desrespected OTHERS' religions or lack thereof
[] acted as though YOUR religion was *superior* to others
[] advocated FORCED gestation of unwanted pregnancy
[] mindlessly opposed HARMLESS same-sex marriage
[X] posted is far right-wing nonsense
[X] whined about things that are NONE of your business
[] opposed beneficial embryonic stem-cell research
[] ignorantly ooposed human cloning
[] mindlessly disparaged OBVIOUS process of evolution
[] posted RRR/LDS Cult asininity
[X] advocated control-feakishness and busybodyism
[X] posted mindless hate-swill
[X] posted ignorant garbage in general
[X] posted something BORING or uninteresting
I really think that you should:
[X] grow up
[X] get therapy
[] lose the busybodyism
[] respect/ignore PERSONAL choices of others
[X] get a life
[X] grow a brain
[X] get a clue
[] get off of the Internet
[] all of the above
In conclusion:
[X] Stop posting gibberish
[] stop supporting asinine hate-agendas
[X] Become an egalitarian
[] *plonk*
kc8qjp
<obamao.sux....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e58a0cfb-5ddf-4596...@s31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On May 9, 6:53 pm, Ron <ron...@wt.net> wrote:
> FUCK OFF WITH YOUR NEO-COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA LIES
>
STFU
Telamon
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 May 2009 15:57:53 -0700, Telamon
> <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> > I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
> > down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
> > else.
>
> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
Clue kook-aid drinker it's the "unfairness doctrine"
> For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
That's for making my point.
> ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
> issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
> opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.
You mean to say all media should required to present the point of view
you like and that's it.
> **VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!
The "unfairness doctrine" run by the liberal fascists.
> -- (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <drivers...@ymail.com>
Kook-aid drinker.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Otherwise known as dork breath:
< SNIP >
> The SOONER the Fairness Doctrine is reinstated, the BETTER!
< SNIP >
The liberal kook-aid drinker wants his views shoved down our throats.
What a kook.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? Sure he is, who would hire this
clown spoke thusly:
> >> Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> >> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
> >> down out throats in the near future but it will be called
> >> something else.
>
> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
> >
> >�For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
> > BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
See if you can wrap your brain around this retard. When the liberals are
in charge speech they don't like is repressed by any means necessary.
It's political warfare and "all is fair in love and war" so the so in
Liberal Orwellian speak "fairness doctrine" is a means of repressing the
opposition.
You know this and are just playing the part of a propaganda agent.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
who are you?
It must really suck for you as a member of the now "loser" party
LOL
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
> <www.LayoffRemedy.com> <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>>> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
>>> down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
>>> else.
>> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
>> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
> Clue: It's the "unfairness doctrine."
Wrong. Because it requires BOTH sides of issues to be
presented EQUALLY. And *that* is FAIR.
>> For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
>> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
>>
>> ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
>> issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
>> opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.
> You mean to say all media should required to present the
> point of view you like and that's it.
Wrong! I mean to present both sides as the FACTS make
clear. Are you **afraid** of relevant FACTS?
>> **VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!
<stupidity-flush>
-- (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���)
xana...@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me. (Tell me first, in here.)
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.
http://www.roadrat.com/RRR -- A Cause for CELEBRATION!!
http://www.roadrat.com/RRR -- FREE BUMPER STICKERS!!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~**~*~*~*~*~*~*
"Religious Freedom?"
"The Puritans nobly fled from a land of despotism to a land of
freedom, where they could not only enjoy their own religion, but
could prevent everybody else from enjoying his."
-- Charles Farrar Browne
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~**~*~*~*~*~*~*
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>> The SOONER the Fairness Doctrine is reinstated, the BETTER!
> [He] wants his views shoved down our throats.
You are QUITE the moron! ALL that the Fairness Doctrine
would do would be to ENSURE that ALL of the relevant FACTS
pertaining to BOTH sides of issues be presented EQUALLY.
Only an IDIOT would find THAT anything but GOOD!!
Looks like you're one of those idiots.
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
<telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>> Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>>> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
>>> down out throats in the near future but it will be called
>>> something else.
>> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
>> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
>>
>>� For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
>> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
> When the liberals are in charge speech they don't like is repressed
> by any means necessary.
No. That's what moronic and hateful NEOCONS and RRR
Cult losers do.
ALL that the Fairness Doctrine would do would be to ENSURE
that ALL of the relevant FACTS pertaining to BOTH sides of issues
be presented EQUALLY.
Only an IDIOT would find THAT anything but GOOD!!
Such as the sort of idiot who would seek to DENY personal
liberties to people, and FEAR the Fairness Doctrine because NO
FACTS even EXIST that would support their loathsome hate-
agendas.
<idiocy-flush>
-- (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <drivers...@ymail.com>
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com.com -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
http://spifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
RRR at the Gateway of Gone Forever
One thing I've discovered over decades of opposing and debating
bigots is that almost NONE of them EVER outgrow that mental deficiency
as a result of having the FACTS presented to them. If I ever were to
think I could accomplish that, my work would be an exercise in frustration.
Any person doltish enough to be an RRR cultist/bigot IS a dolt. And
probably will either continue to be one for life, or will GRADUALLY outgrow
it as more and more of them go into the closet rather than being ostra-
cized as sociopaths. It's a certainty that countless tens of thousands
of the former Segregationists who are still alive today STILL are -- in
their minds. And just PRETEND not to be, out of a sense of self-preser-
vation, rather than become laughingstocks. It will someday be the same
for those who today are outspoken bigots with respect to same-sex
marriage, and abortion, after their agendas have become extinct, and
they have become pass�.
That, I think, is a glimpse of a refreshing American future. One that
has no more of a "religious Radical Right" (RRR) than today still exists
a KKK. The RRR and it's agendas' days are most assuredly (and thank-
fully) numbered. Then... good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish.
So WHY do I debate them in here? Because by presenting the FACTS
that are devastating to their agenda, it can help fence-sitters to want
no part of their hate-agendas. And to help accelerate the process of
raising the consciousness of society to the utter ludicrousness and socio-
pathicness of those agenda. And THAT increasing perception of the
truth will ultimately bring society to the critical mass necessary to cross
the tipping point, and REJECT the RRR's agendas... forever.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Telamon
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:38:27 -0700,
> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
> > <www.LayoffRemedy.com> <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> >>> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
> >>> down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
> >>> else.
>
> >> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
> >> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
>
> > Clue: It's the "unfairness doctrine."
>
> Wrong. Because it requires BOTH sides of issues to be
> presented EQUALLY. And *that* is FAIR.
I'm right and you know it Mr. Minister of propaganda.
> >> For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
> >> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
> >>
> >> ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
> >> issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
> >> opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.
>
> > You mean to say all media should required to present the
> > point of view you like and that's it.
>
> Wrong! I mean to present both sides as the FACTS make
> clear. Are you **afraid** of relevant FACTS?
Get this through your very thick head. What you intend has no basis on
what the liberal Dem's intend to do.
> >> **VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!
>
> <stupidity-flush>
You going to flush yourself O'clueless one.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:57:33 -0700, Telamon
> <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
> >> Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> >>> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
> >>> down out throats in the near future but it will be called
> >>> something else.
>
> >> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
> >> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
> >>
> >>� For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
> >> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
>
> > When the liberals are in charge speech they don't like is repressed
> > by any means necessary.
>
> No. That's what moronic and hateful NEOCONS and RRR
> Cult losers do.
Yes, the conservatives have not tried to control the media. They have
not passed anything that regulates free speech other then obscenity. The
liberals are the ones that you have to watch out for as they want to
regulate speech they don't like to hear.
> ALL that the Fairness Doctrine would do would be to ENSURE
> that ALL of the relevant FACTS pertaining to BOTH sides of issues
> be presented EQUALLY.
All the "unfairness doctrine" has accomplished is to suppress free
speech the liberals don't like to hear.
> Only an IDIOT would find THAT anything but GOOD!!
Only an idiot would not be able to see how this is perverted so the
liberals get an advantage they don't deserve.
> Such as the sort of idiot who would seek to DENY personal
> liberties to people, and FEAR the Fairness Doctrine because NO
> FACTS even EXIST that would support their loathsome hate-
> agendas.
That would be you scumbag.
> <idiocy-flush> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <drivers...@ymail.com>
Sounds like a good idea.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
> <www.LayoffRemedy.com> <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
>>>>> down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
>>>>> else.
>>>> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
>>>> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
>>> Clue: It's the "unfairness doctrine."
>> Wrong. Because it requires BOTH sides of issues to be
>> presented EQUALLY. And *that* is FAIR.
> I'm right and you know it ...
Being DELUSIONAL clearly is your long suit! LOL!!!
>>>> For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
>>>> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
>>>>
>>>> ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
>>>> issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
>>>> opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.
>>> You mean to say all media should required to present the
>>> point of view you like and that's it.
>> Wrong! I mean to present both sides as the FACTS make
>> clear. Are you **afraid** of relevant FACTS?
> Get this through your very thick head. What you intend has
> no basis on what the liberal Dem's intend to do.
LOL!! Whatever they do, it would be EXPONENTIALLY BETTER
than the CRAP that Warmonger-in-Thief GW Bush laid on us!!
We have a LOT of crap to UNDO in these next 8 years! And
hopefully we'll have ANOTHER 8 after that!
>>>> **VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!
-- (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <drivers...@ymail.com>
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com.com -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
http://spifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Employees in Right-to Work States -- DEFEND that Right!!
Because THIS is what you will be in for if the Loathsome
"Unionization's Camel's Nose Act" is passed by Congress!
(Here come the GOONS!!)
It's DECEPTIVELY entitled the "Employees' Free Choice Act."
But it guarantees the OPPOSITE of freedom!
As THIS astute person was kind enough to tell us ---
"I love the pro-union responses! I'm amazed they can
type such disingenuous drivel with a straight face! I see
they don't address the fact that the bill allows and encour-
ages unions to apply unlimited pressure on employees to
to sign the cards.
"I have the "United Steel Workers of America" union at
my place and twice now the employees have tried to de-
certify. The USW sent goons from a number of surround-
ing states to harass and threaten the employees in person
at their homes, at all hours of the night and weekends to
the point that many complained to the National Labor Board
and a number of them quit. The next round is coming this
year and the employees seem prepared for a battle. The
USW sure doesn't want to give up the money they get each
week for nothing."
-- Buerste" <Bue...@att.com>, 3-15-09
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Telamon
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 16:57:27 -0700,
> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be:
> > <www.LayoffRemedy.com> <drivers...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> >>> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
> >>>> Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> >>>>> I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
> >>>>> down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
> >>>>> else.
>
> >>>> CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
> >>>> upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can
>
> >>> Clue: It's the "unfairness doctrine."
>
> >> Wrong. Because it requires BOTH sides of issues to be
> >> presented EQUALLY. And *that* is FAIR.
>
> > I'm right and you know it ...
>
> Being DELUSIONAL clearly is your long suit! LOL!!!
Ok, so you are a complete moron.
> >>>> For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
> >>>> BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.
> >>>>
> >>>> ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
> >>>> issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
> >>>> opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.
>
> >>> You mean to say all media should required to present the
> >>> point of view you like and that's it.
>
> >> Wrong! I mean to present both sides as the FACTS make
> >> clear. Are you **afraid** of relevant FACTS?
>
> > Get this through your very thick head. What you intend has
> > no basis on what the liberal Dem's intend to do.
>
> LOL!! Whatever they do, it would be EXPONENTIALLY BETTER
> than the CRAP that Warmonger-in-Thief GW Bush laid on us!!
He didn't do anything retard. Free speech does not need new regulation
by the Obominator.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
There has no regulation of free speech retard so there is nothing to
undo.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
~ RHF
> On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
> > We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
> > rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
> > [link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
> > impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio
>
> over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
>
>
> Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
> lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas
WAY - Fairness For All Equally
-or- It Ain't Fairness At All ~ RHF
.
AM Conservative Talk Radio -versus- FM Liberal NPR Radio
.
Liberal NPR/PBS/CPB -versus- The Fairness Doctrine = ROTFL
.
1 - Show Me One Hour of Rush Limbaugh on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
2 - Show Me One Hour of Sean Hannity on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
3 - Show Me One Hour of Bill O'Reilly on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
4 - Show Me One Hour of Glenn Beck on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
5 - Show Me One Hour of Laura Ingraham on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
6 - Show Me One Hour of Dennis Miller on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
7 - Show Me One Hour of Michael Savage on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
8 - Show Me One Hour of Laura Schlesinger on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
9 - Show Me One Hour of Neal Boortz on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
10 - Show Me One Hour of G. Gordon Liddy on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It's Missing . . .
11 - Show Me One Hour of Mark Levin on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
12 - Show Me One Hour of Melanie Morgan on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
13 - Show Me One Hour of Barbara Simpson on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
14 - Show Me One Hour of Joe Scarborough on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
15 - Show Me One Hour of Curtis Sliwa on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
16 - Show Me One Hour of Michael Reagan on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
17 - Show Me One Hour of Jerry Doyle on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
18 - Show Me One Hour of Ken Hamblin on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
19 - Show Me One Hour of Jeff Rense on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
20 - Show Me One Hour of Matt Drudge on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
21 - Show Me One Hour of Alan Keyes on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
22 - Show Me One Hour of Oliver North on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
23 - Show Me One Hour of Roger Hedgecock on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
24 - Show Me One Hour of Dave Ramsey on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
25 - Show Me One Hour of Armstrong Williams on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
26 - Show Me One Hour of Stanley Monteith on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
27 - Show Me One Hour of Larry Elder on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
28 - Show Me One Hour of Hal Turner on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
29 - Show Me One Hour of Alex Jones on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
30 - Show Me One Hour of Joyce Riley on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . . Derry Brownfield,
31 - Show Me One Hour of Derry Brownfield on NPR/PBS
- - - Oops It Missing . . .
Those are just 31 Conservative Voices you will
never Hear of the US Government supported
Liberal Media outlets NPR/PBS/CPB/PRI etc.
Bring the "Fairness Doctrine" Equally to All Broadcast
Media : AM Radio; FM Radio; College "Educational"
Radio; Public "NPR" Radio; All TV Stations including
Public "PBS" TV Stations; etc.
.
fairness, -is- Fairness. -is- FAIRNESS !
For All Equally -or- It Ain't Fairness At All ~ RHF
.
Who Needs The Fairness Doctrine :
When You Could Have Obama-Talk©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/f3554ea7f2c641cf
.
.
~ RHF
> obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On May 9, 7:58 pm, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
>
> >>> Then let the public decide what is in their best interest.
> >> That is precisely why broadcast media needs to be more down the middle.
>
> > Ja, let Heil 0baMa0 Hitler decide what is "down the middle" instead of
> > Free Market Consumers - (me and you)
- There are no "free markets". Consumerism is the opposite of freedom.
Dave -proclaims- There Are No "Free Markets".
* Note to Dave Yeah the Obama-Regime© Controls the Markets Now.
.
Dave -proclaims- Consumerism Is The Opposite Of Freedom.
* Note to Dave You Are Such A Good Little Obama-Speaker©
.
Dave - Soon you will have earned your very own
Obama-Nista© Red {Blood Soaked} T-Shirt to
http://redstandard.org/reasoninrevolt/chavez_rally_02.jpg
Show your Commitment to Change and Creating
a Just Socialist Society for the Oppressed Peoples
of the USA and the Elimination of the Capital Class.
http://www.chesafterlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/2l-fantasticfour1.jpg
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.news-media/msg/34c9f29073e076fd
.
Dave next you can earn an Obama-Nista© Red
{Blood Soaked} Beret after you Graduate
from the Obama Workers Brigade Academy.
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/files/images/2006/11/chavez_close_rally1.jpg
.
Dave then you can enroll in the Obama-Peace-Army©
of a "Just Socialist Society" {Obama's Civilian Defense
Force to be as large as the US Army} and be 'issued'
an AK-47 to Fight in the Streets of America against
http://www.robertamsterdam.com/kalashnikov0806.jpg
the Oppressors of the People for Prez Obama and
the Democrat Party of the USA.
http://nylatinojournal.com/home/images/stories/venezuela_elections.jpg
.
dave - 'change' begins with you and your red t-shirt ~ RHF
-ps- 'we love our prez obama'
hey let's all chant it :
We Love Our Prez Obama
Obama is Good
We Love Our Prez Obama
Change is Good
We Love Our Prez Obama
Socialism is Change
We Love Our Prez Obama
Obama is Change
We Love Our Prez Obama
© © © © © © ©
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/chavez-castro.jpg
.
.
~ RHF
> ~ RHF wrote:
> > On May 9, 3:47 pm, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
> >> obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> ery
>
> >>> media outlet everywhere.
> >> The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
> >> political atmosphere. Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
> >> interest.
>
> >> Newspapers can print whatever they like, because anybody can start a
> >> newspaper. Spectrum is a finite commodity. -
> > - They cannot be coralled and used to further
> > - political objectives of the capital class to the
> > - detriment of everyone else.
>
- - To The Detriment Of Everyone Else
- You are a tool.
- If you aren't part of the solution you are the problem.
- Get out of the way or you will be run over.
Dave -proclaims- You Are A Tool.
* Note to Dave Yeah You Are A "Tool" of the Obama-Regime©
.
Dave -proclaims- If You Aren't Part Of The Solution
You Are The Problem.
* Note to Dave You Are Such A Good Little Obama-Speaker©
and such a good little
.
Dave -the-obama-speaker-proclaims- Get Out
Of The Way Or You Will Be Run Over.
* Note to Dave You Are A Real "Political Cadre"
{Revolutionary Street Soldier} for Obama.
dave
>
> Bring the "Fairness Doctrine" Equally to All Broadcast
> Media : AM Radio; FM Radio; College "Educational"
> Radio; Public "NPR" Radio; All TV Stations including
> Public "PBS" TV Stations; etc.
> .
They have Bill Bennett and the McLaughlin Group.
dave
> .
> dave - 'change' begins with you and your red t-shirt ~ RHF
I wish I had a red T-shirt. Go Rockets!
dave
>
> Dave -proclaims- You Are A Tool.
> * Note to Dave Yeah You Are A "Tool" of the Obama-Regime�
> .
Obama is way too moderate for me. I don't really agree with his
policies. I'm more of a Jeremiah Wright type activist.
He [Obama] seems like an affable guy, otherwise. Nice family.
KD8IMG, Robert Trendel, is a twice convicted stalker of women.
> <obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com> wrote in message
moparholic is Roger Nair of Winter Brook Dr. in Brunswick,
Ohio...just
in case you did not know. He is the person posing as KC8QJP.