Kent bradley Wills, World's Most Famous Garage Burglary Felon

[Greegor]

http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg

[Kent Wills]

On Thu, 3 May 2012 15:05:32 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
wrote:


You altered the group list.
You claim doing such in an admission of defeat.
Or was that another of your acts of deception?

Context restored at no additional cost.
You can't keep the TRUTH about you from being know, Greg.

>>>> So long as he accepts that his fantasies about me will never
>>>>become reality, it's not a major problem. It's not like he could ever
>>>>afford to visit me to try and make them a reality.
>>>
>>>Kent has rotated through various types of denials,
>>
>> There is no denial in the post to which you replied.
>> Perhaps you think I actually do think that if you are able to
>>accept that your sexual fantasies about me will not become reality,
>>this would be a problem. If so, know that you're wrong.
>> That you have a sexual OBSESSION with me, while kind of sad since
>>I think you could do much better [1], hasn't caused me any harm.
>>Whereas you can't afford to travel to the Des Moines area (less of a
>>chance if you LIE about Rogers, AR where to be true), and whereas I
>>have no intentions of traveling to Cedar Rapids, there is no reason
>>for your desires for me to be a problem.
>>
>>>some of which are not compatible with the others.
>>
>> Given the TRUTH that outside of your drug induced (unless you
>>lied) delusions, I offer no denial of anything in the post to which
>>you replied, you deception fails.
>> Did you honestly think your LIE would work?
>>
>>>Kent used a few stooges and socks to help him
>>>try to sell his false denials. The funniest part is
>>>that Kent's APPEAL reflects the same kind of
>>>idiocy that Kent tries on usenet.
>>
>> Whereas you openly admitted I have no convictions, I can't have
>>any appeal. Given your LONG history as a defendant, and your own
>>FAILED appeal (arguments were REFUSED due to your having been so
>>completely and competently PROVED guilty of BEATING your ex-wife), you
>>will already know this.
>> Sadly, you've offered more PROOF that unless you make a mistake,
>>are forced, or think the truth will promote one or more of your MANY
>>lies, you are psychologically UNABLE to be honest.
>>
>>>
>>>http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg
>>>
>>
>> Your OBSESSION with the man is already accepted.
>>
>>>http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>
>> You already admitted that's not about me.
>>
>>>
>>>Screen Captures further proving the ID on Kent is correct.
>>>http://immaculatecongestion.blogspot.com/
>>
>> Contrary to what you claim in the blog, unless you LIED when you
>>claimed it's yours, I do not have a twin sister.
>> One does not experience jet lag when traveling within the same
>>time zone.
>> That some woman neither of us know went to Aruba in February has
>>no bearing on my having gone in March.
>> Since the LIES on your site have been exposed, MANY times, please
>>explain why you are so COMPELLED to continue posting the link.
>>
>>[Snip of items you openly, though accidentally, admitted aren't about
>>me]
>>
>> What specific part of your mental illnesses (plural) forces you
>>to post that which you've already admitted isn't about me as if it is
>>about me? You've been asked this question MANY times, yet you've
>>never answered.
>> Here are some items that are 100% true, accurate and about you.
>>And, according to you, as believable as the claim that water is wet.
>>Well, all except the first two items. They simply show how mentally
>>ill you really are.
>
>http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg


Your tacit admission, by YOUR standards, that ever claim I
present above is correct is noted.

Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg

"I am Bob Larson."
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
as mentally ill as he presents.
Message-ID:
<df610804-da3b-4aa8...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>

A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
that water is wet):

Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT

"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead

Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."

"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser

" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services

With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."

"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.

--a true story

As of Wednesday, August 31, 2011:

SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT

JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.

Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.

[Greegor]

Hi Kent!

[Kent Wills]

On Fri, 4 May 2012 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Hi Kent!

Your admission that you lied, and can no longer lie your way out
of it is accepted.

[Greegor]

Hi Kent!

[Kent Wills]

On Mon, 7 May 2012 21:36:42 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Hi Kent!

Your admission that you lied and can no longer lie your way out
of your lie is accepted.

[Greegor]

Hi Kent!

[Greegor]

KBW > Sadly, for you, I'm heterosexual,

bsr > With a pretend wife and son...lolololol.

That's what they call a BEARD isn't it?

[Kent Wills]

Replying to your own sock as you are is NOT the behavior of the
mentally sound, Greg.
Let your shrink know about this at your next session.

[Greegor]

Kent thinks I am his one and ONLY detractor.

[Kent Wills]

On Sat, 19 May 2012 06:52:08 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Kent thinks I am his one and ONLY detractor.

What TRUTH about you did I expose in the post to which you
replied that has you so SCARED you were COMPELLED to remove the
totality of the post, then LIE?
Serious question, Greg.

[Greegor]

Are you still going to pretend that I am
your one and ONLY detractor, Kent? LOL

[Kent Wills]

On Sat, 19 May 2012 17:09:05 -0700 (PDT), Greegor

<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:


>>>Kent thinks I am his one and ONLY detractor.
>>
>> What TRUTH about you did I expose in the post to which you
>>replied that has you so SCARED you were COMPELLED to remove the
>>totality of the post, then LIE?
>> Serious question, Greg.
>

>Are you still going to pretend that I am
>your one and ONLY detractor, Kent? LOL

Answer the question I asked, coward.

[Greegor]

> >>>Kent thinks I am his one and ONLY detractor.

> >>     What TRUTH about you did I expose in the post to which you
> >>replied that has you so SCARED you were COMPELLED to remove the
> >>totality of the post, then LIE?
> >>     Serious question, Greg.

G > Are you still going to pretend that I am
G > your one and ONLY detractor, Kent?  LOL

Kent?

[Kent Wills]

On Sun, 20 May 2012 10:32:54 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

Post edit restored to the original text.

Another of your MANY acts of deception has FAILED, Greg. But
then, you've already offered the tacit admission, by YOUR standards,
that you fail at everything you ever try.

>>>>>Kent thinks I am his one and ONLY detractor.
>>>
>>>> � � What TRUTH about you did I expose in the post to which you
>>>>replied that has you so SCARED you were COMPELLED to remove the
>>>>totality of the post, then LIE?
>>>> � � Serious question, Greg.
>>

>>> Are you still going to pretend that I am

>>> your one and ONLY detractor, Kent? �LOL
>>

>> Answer the question I asked, coward.
>

>Kent?

Again, answer the question I asked, coward.

[Greegor]

Hi

[Greegor]

> > naked in the bathroom
> > with any 8 year old girl.

""Fred Hall"" > Heh.  She was 7

I was never naked in the bathroom
with any 7 year old girl, Gary Lee.

Do you think anybody believed you
when you claimed you woke up with
your girlfriend's daughter on top
of your Johnson?

I was on a Social Services registry for
a few years, but you plea bargained to
a misd sex offense BUT with lifelong
listing on a CRIMINAL sex offender registry.
Moving to another state where they don't
place misdemeanor sex offenders on the
sex offender registry to weasel out
of your plea bargain deal is not
something to be proud of, Gary Lee.

[Fred Hall]

On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:47:42 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<83f01e09-de02-4091...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>:

>naked in the bathroom
>with any 7 year old gir

Liar

--

http://www.smbtech.com/ras/
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/03/ras-mikaere-eunuch-enoch-michael.html

[Jazzy Belle]

On May 24, 2:47 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > naked in the bathroom
> > > with any 8 year old girl.
>
> ""Fred Hall"" > Heh.  She was 7
>
> I was never naked in the bathroom
> with any 7 year old girl, Gary Lee.

Intended distortion noted. Intended LIE noted.
SHE was the one naked.

She also had her panties down when you claimed she " enjoyed" peeing
on herself and when you wiped the pee from between her legs with your
BARE hand.

Anyone familiar with the subjects of child abuse and child sexual
abuse knows that children do NOT "enjoy" peeing on themselves and that
it is a reaction to make themselves less "attractive" to the molester.

Moe
>

[Greegor]

Usenet misfit Moe making up nasty lies as usual.

So desperate to slam me for something bad
that she lies her ass off.

[Kent Wills]

This is further enforced when the child is well past the typical
age of potty training (two years of age being fairly common for
females). While loss of bladder control can, and frequently does,
happen for two to three year olds while sleeping, it's very rare when
awake. It's even more rare in healthy six to seven year old females.
Baring a developmental disorder, physical and/or mental, a six to
seven year old female will not have bladder control issues. Such a
female will be able to urinate on herself in the hopes of making
herself less appealing to her abuser.
Whereas Greg has claimed the child was intellectually advanced
for her age, her mental development was either normal, or more likely
above normal. Unless Greg lied.
If she had physical problems, this would have been diagnosed at
some point and Greg would have made mention of it. Most probably in
the document I call "The Lisa Rant."
It's far more plausible that she urinated on herself to make her
appear less attractive to Greg. Sadly, she didn't know Greg would
simply wash it off her, returning her to the state he liked so much.

[Kent Wills]

So females don't urinate on themselves to make them less
attractive to molesters?
An interesting claim you're presenting, Greg. Do offer your
evidence that shows her claim to be a lie.
Or are you lying?

[Greegor]

On May 26, 1:50 pm, This account has been banned because it violated
the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laugh...@u.kook> wrote:

> Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On May 24, 2:47 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > naked in the bathroom
> >> > > with any 8 year old girl.
>
> >> ""Fred Hall"" > Heh.  She was 7
>
> >> I was never naked in the bathroom
> >> with any 7 year old girl, Gary Lee.
>
> >  Intended distortion noted. Intended LIE noted.
> >  SHE was the one naked.
>
> >  She also had her panties down when you claimed she " enjoyed" peeing
> > on herself and when you wiped the pee from between her legs with your
> > BARE hand.
>

> Ewww.

Whenever Moe runs out of angles
Maureen McAllister just makes up
nasty convenient lies.

> > Anyone familiar with the subjects of child abuse and child sexual
> > abuse knows that children do NOT "enjoy" peeing on themselves and that
> > it is a reaction to make themselves less "attractive" to the molester.

In the middle of the school day, Moe?
Go back to your TeeVee watching, psycho!

> The poor child must've wet herself from fear of Gregory Scott Hanson,
> convicted wife beater.

She only wet herself at school, nimrods.
Statistically your claims are BS of course.
Millions of kids have daytime wetting
problems that have nothing to do with abuse.

It's statistically not an indicator of abuse
even thought lots of idiots make that
false claim.

Only paranoid freaks like AUK'ers and
CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
wetting indicates abuse.

And even if some idiot believes that it
indicates abuse, the fact that it only
took place at school in the middle of
the day makes accusations even more stupid.


Gary Lee Burnore is a bonafide convicted CHILD MOLESTER

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg


GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages)Oct 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page3.JPG

"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.

Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.

The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,
suggests that risk for potential victims
may be high."

J. Puccinelli, Probation Officer, Unit IV
Municipal Court of the State of California,
Santa Clara County, People of the State
of California v. Gary Burnore
Probation Office No. DMU044
Court No. C9618225 DA No. 961131078
Santa Clara Police Department Case No. 9615185



SEVEN PAGE POLICE NARRATIVE

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page3.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page4.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page5.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page6.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page7.JPG

Police Narrative Pages 1-7
http://bayimg.com/haNigAaBd
http://bayimg.com/hanIIaaBd
http://bayimg.com/HaNIlAabd
http://bayimg.com/hAnimaaBD
http://bayimg.com/IANIaaAbD
http://bayimg.com/iaNicaabd
http://bayimg.com/iAnidaabd


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/410d9afbc1184818?hl=en&dmode=source

Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr2117984pbc.
0.1338033557517;

Sat, 26 May 2012 04:59:17 -0700 (PDT)

Path: pr3ni50869pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!
postnews.google.com!b5g2000pbm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.support.child-
protective-services,misc.legal,alt.law-enforcement
Subject: Re: Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 wants more attention
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 04:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID:
<0ead6bd2-5cc3-4cba...@b5g2000pbm.googlegroups.com>
References: <8faeec68-9d52-4427-
accd-1f7...@to5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<05b81dd3-dd5d-4586...@l5g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
<483021a0-c976-4b1d...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
<d4b961eb35fd6274...@not-for-mail.invalid> <jpeqbj$tks
$1...@dont-email.me>
<jpgos8$sv9$4...@dont-email.me> <2c787c0f-9a97-4926-ba09-
c43846...@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<jpkl6e$jgt$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <83f01e09-de02-4091-
a8cc-a7d...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.227.25.206
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1338033557 31127 127.0.0.1 (26 May 2012
11:59:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: b5g2000pbm.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=75.227.25.206; posting-account=zW8kxwgAAABrCuDYTbWRR0mwD854eYAP
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/12.0,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May 24, 2:47=A0am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > naked in the bathroom
> > > with any 8 year old girl.
>

> ""Fred Hall"" > Heh. =A0She was 7

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<19a99af9-d8e7-4354...@j10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:

>CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
>wetting indicates abuse.

Yep, that's why Lisa's little girl was taken away.

--

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/05/may-2012-nominations.html

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html

http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)

[Greegor]

[Dan Sullivan]

"Fred Hall" <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:jprcjf$25d$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...

> On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <19a99af9-d8e7-4354...@j10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
>>CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
>>wetting indicates abuse.
>
> Yep, that's why Lisa's little girl was taken away.

greg hanson was an adult male unrelated to the little (7 yo) girl.

The primary reason Lisa's little girl was removed from greg's physical
custody was because in Feb of 2001 a neighbor reported that greg locked the
girl out of her own home with no coat, shoes or socks.

In the next few weeks greg admitted going into the bathroom whenever the
girl finished showering (supposedly so he could hand her a towel).

greg admitted physically handling the girl while she was naked.

greg admitted forcing the girl to take cold showers as punishment.

greg admitted spanking the girl.

greg proudly admitted driving the girl around town so she could pick bottles
and cans out of garbage cans for the deposit money.

[Kent Wills]

On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT), Greegor

<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On May 26, 1:50�pm, This account has been banned because it violated
>the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laugh...@u.kook> wrote:
>> Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > On May 24, 2:47�am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > naked in the bathroom
>> >> > > with any 8 year old girl.
>>
>> >> ""Fred Hall"" > Heh. �She was 7
>>
>> >> I was never naked in the bathroom
>> >> with any 7 year old girl, Gary Lee.
>>
>> > �Intended distortion noted. Intended LIE noted.
>> > �SHE was the one naked.
>>
>> > �She also had her panties down when you claimed she " enjoyed" peeing
>> > on herself and when you wiped the pee from between her legs with your
>> > BARE hand.
>>
>> Ewww.
>
>Whenever Moe runs out of angles
>Maureen McAllister just makes up
>nasty convenient lies.
>

Was she fully dressed, or were you wearing gloves at the time?

>> > Anyone familiar with the subjects of child abuse and child sexual
>> > abuse knows that children do NOT "enjoy" peeing on themselves and that
>> > it is a reaction to make themselves less "attractive" to the molester.
>
>In the middle of the school day, Moe?
>Go back to your TeeVee watching, psycho!
>

Wait. You claimed she was outside paying with friends when it
happened. Now she was at school?
You need to pick a lie, and stick with it.

>> The poor child must've wet herself from fear of Gregory Scott Hanson,
>> convicted wife beater.
>
>She only wet herself at school, nimrods.

You used to claim she was outside the house (the single wide
trailer Lisa was buying or renting, depending on your specific claim)
playing with friends.
Why have you changed your story, Greg?

>Statistically your claims are BS of course.
>Millions of kids have daytime wetting
>problems that have nothing to do with abuse.

Was she three years old and taking a nap?
And, until now, you're claim has always been that she chose to
wet herself rather than miss five minutes of playing with her friends.
Of course, that was when you claimed she was outside of the single
wide.

>
>It's statistically not an indicator of abuse
>even thought lots of idiots make that
>false claim.
>
>Only paranoid freaks like AUK'ers and

Is this the reason you started cross-posting to AUK? Because you
believed they would accept your claims about Witch Hunt, the
conspiracy you claim is out to get you?

>CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
>wetting indicates abuse.
>

If it was due to a physiological condition, there would be
medical documentation. Said documentation would have exonerated you,
Greg.

>And even if some idiot believes that it
>indicates abuse, the fact that it only
>took place at school in the middle of
>the day makes accusations even more stupid.
>

I don't recall you ever stating a time of day for the incident to
have occurred, but I do recall you originally claiming it was outside
of the house (single wide) while playing with friends.
Why the change in location, Greg? Did you think I had forgotten
your original version of the story?

[snip of forgeries that have nothing to do with Moe]

Your DESPERATION to distract from the TRUTH that's posted about
you most likely causes people to pay closer attention, stupid.

[Kent Wills]

On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:11:56 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
><gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
><19a99af9-d8e7-4354...@j10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
>>CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
>>wetting indicates abuse.
>
>Yep, that's why Lisa's little girl was taken away.

There was more to it than that.

[Kent Wills]

On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:19:50 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
>>>wetting indicates abuse.
>>
>>Yep, that's why Lisa's little girl was taken away.
>

>GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages)Oct 1997
>

[...]

What do forgeries have to do with the TRUTH Fred posted about
you? I don't see the connection.

[Greegor]

KBW > Subject: Re: Greg Hanson CONVICTED CHILD ABUSER

No, I have not been convicted of any such thing.

In 2003 Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8, 1969
caught a misdemeanor for using a teen as an
accomplice to his famous Garage Burglary Felony.
Kent has two felonies for thieving.

In 1997 Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957
caught a misdemeanor for Child Molestation
in California.

[Dan Sullivan]

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cc609fcf-443a-4577...@s5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...

> KBW > Subject: Re: Greg Hanson CONVICTED CHILD ABUSER
>
> No, I have not been convicted of any such thing.

greg hanson was convicted once by a jury and once by pleading guilty to
abusing his mentally ill wife.

This was before the Lisa Watkins' situation.

And greg hanson was also being investigated for child abuse and neglect at
that time.

[Greegor]

On May 26, 6:45 pm, "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Daniel J Sullivan III ( Now 64 years old ) of
6 S Pinelake Drive, Patchogue, NY 11772-2234
had 20+ investigations for child abuse and was
FOUNDED at least 5 times. One of his FOUNDED
reports was for CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE.

Feb 2002
"I was founded for SA of my daughter back in '93." - Dan Sullivan
[...]
'The "credible evidence" was my (3 yo) daughter's statement that "My
daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet." ' - Dan Sullivan
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/52b49e5611d619ea

April 2004 Dan Sullivan wrote
"My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d15f8e338226b780

July 2007 Dan Sullivan wrote
"My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet." - Dan
Sullivan
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26b08f9f2b9

[Greegor]

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

[Greegor]

GLB > It's clear that you accuse anyone who
GLB > finds out about you of doing what you do.

Sure, Gary, you're just an innocent guy
who woke up with his girfriend's kid
riding his prong. It's MY fault that
nobody believed your story and that you
got convicted of MOLESTING Rachael.

Similarly, I made the State of NY
investigate Dan Sullivan 20+ times
for child abuse and decide he was
FOUNDED for 5 of those, one for
Child Sexual Abuse! Years before
I ever heard of him even!

I MADE Dan post his "puppet bear"
story multiple times over the years.

I made Kent commit his thieving
felonies YEARS before I ever heard of him!
I MADE Kent brag about selling an entire
apartment building just so he could be
connected to his actual parents through
the online public tax records.
I MADE Kent post his DOB to usenet just
before his second and more famous felony.

And most of all I MADE you three morons
harass me repeatedly on usenet for
convictions and issues when each of you
three has a rather colorful history yourself.

[ Whining about LV snipped. ]

GLB > you're following me a round like a
GLB > puppy and I've said little abut you.

I don't quite see it that way, Gary Lee!

GLB > You REALLY think those other people are me?

Yes.

GLB > You're a fucking fool.

Sure I am, Gary Lee!

If you give me your attorney's name
address, phone number and bar card
number I'll be glad to give him my
address for serving court papers,
Gary Lee!

You might have a chance if you
hire Charles Novins!


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/e5b60c4297535d6e?hl=en&dmode=source

Received: by 10.68.241.7 with SMTP id we7mr3291332pbc.4.1338083198318;
Sat, 26 May 2012 18:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: pr3ni53065pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!
nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!
transit3.readnews.com!panix!panix.com!gburnore
From: Gary L Burnore <gburn...@databasix.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.support.child-
protective-services,misc.legal,alt.law-enforcement
Subject: Re: Daniel J Sullivan III investigated 20+ FOUNDED 5+ times
once for CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 01:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <jps11u$bbu$1...@reader1.panix.com>
References: <jpeqbj$tks$1...@dont-email.me> <jpgos8$sv9$4...@dont-email.me>
<2c787c0f-9a97-4926...@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<jpkl6e$jgt$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <83f01e09-de02-4091-a8cc-
a7dbe9...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
<0ead6bd2-5cc3-4cba...@b5g2000pbm.googlegroups.com>
<8b2389e0acb0f882...@not-for-mail.invalid> <19a99af9-
d8e7-4354-856...@j10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <jprcjf$25d
$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <4fc14650$0$3085$607e...@cv.net>
<cc609fcf-443a-4577...@s5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
<4fc16b2f$0$10921$607e...@cv.net> <13c74a1f-e8b8-400b-b168-
b0f5bb...@3g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1338083198 11646 166.84.1.2 (27 May 2012
01:46:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ab...@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 01:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Jamie-is-an-asshole: youbetcha
X-Jamie-Baillie-Web: thetruthaboutjamie.blogspot.com
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/5.1.2
(i386))

[Greegor]

G > In the middle of the school day, Moe?

G > Go back to your TeeVee watching, psycho!

KBW > Wait.
KBW > You claimed she was outside paying
KBW > with friends when it happened.

No I didn't. You're making up BS again.

KBW >  Now she was at school?

Every time.


KBW > You need to pick a lie, and stick with it.

The major LIE is your presentation that
my story has changed when it has not.

You played this BS "brain fart" game
( lies ) more and I'm not interested.



Gary Lee Burnore's NC Corrections listing!

http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE

[Kent Wills]

On Sat, 26 May 2012 16:33:00 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:


>>greg hanson was an adult male unrelated to the little (7 yo) girl.
>>
>>The primary reason Lisa's little girl was removed from greg's physical
>>custody was because in Feb of 2001 a neighbor reported that greg locked the
>>girl out of her own home with no coat, shoes or socks.
>>
>>In the next few weeks greg admitted going into the bathroom whenever the
>>girl finished showering (supposedly so he could hand her a towel).
>>
>>greg admitted physically handling the girl while she was naked.
>>
>>greg admitted forcing the girl to take cold showers as punishment.
>>
>>greg admitted spanking the girl.
>>
>>greg proudly admitted driving the girl around town so she could pick bottles
>>and cans out of garbage cans for the deposit money.
>

>KBW > Subject: Re: Greg Hanson CONVICTED CHILD ABUSER

Outside of your drug induced delusions, I'm not Dan.
If you check the headers (I know, you believe they are invisible
but they are not) you'll see this is my first pos to the thread.
Are you really as SCARED of the TRUTH as you are presenting?

>
>No, I have not been convicted of any such thing.
>

Dan doesn't claim you've been so convicted.

[Snip of items not related to Dan in any way]

What TRUTH about you did Dan post that has you so DESPERATE to
distract? I'm fairly certain everything he posted about you was PROVED
to be 100% true long ago. Why is his brining it up now causing you so
much fear?

[Kent Wills]

I recall Greg mentioning how Donna's mom felt it necessary to
remove Donna's daughter from Greg's influence. Much like Lisa's mom
did with Lisa's daughter.
Two different grandmas, two different daughters and two different
little girls separated by a few years and probably more than a few
miles.
Something all parties had in common: Greg.

[Kent Wills]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 01:37:55 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>G > In the middle of the school day, Moe?
>G > Go back to your TeeVee watching, psycho!
>
>KBW > Wait.
>KBW > You claimed she was outside paying
>KBW > with friends when it happened.
>
>No I didn't. You're making up BS again.
>

If I'm lying, prove it.

>KBW >  Now she was at school?
>
>Every time.

Prove it.

>
>KBW > You need to pick a lie, and stick with it.
>
>The major LIE is your presentation that
>my story has changed when it has not.
>

Prove it.

>You played this BS "brain fart" game
>( lies ) more and I'm not interested.
>

Brave, brave Sir Robin!

>
>
>Gary Lee Burnore's NC Corrections listing!
>

I'm not Gary, stupid.

[Greegor]

Official North Carolina Department Of Corrections web site

http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=4469+Still+Pines+Drive,+Raleigh,+NC+27613-3334

[Jazzy Belle]

Projection AND irony noted.

>
> So desperate to slam me for something bad
> that she lies her ass off.

Projection noted. Lies noted.

Hanson, you know that one of my many interests is true crime. Guess
what, dipbrain? Child abuse and the behavior of child molesters and
abusers ARE areas of true crime.

You admitted you were charged with abusing your ex-wife
You yourself described how you looked at and treated Lisa's then seven
year old daughter in ways that no normal adult would ever do, but YOU
did. The "training her like you do with cats" claim and the FACT that
you still try to cover up your "wiping the pee with your bare hand"
story and your obvious pervo watching her naked in the bathroom come
from what YOU posted, pervert.

Your subsequent selfishness after she was taken away from the home,
your obvious not caring if Lisa ever regained custody of her daughter
and your arrogance in wanting the courts to pay for the storage fees
of your hoarded junk that made Lisa's home unsafe for the child are
some of MANY examples of what you are, gaggie.

No normal, sane adult man would have considered what you admitted you
did as appropriate.

Greg, you are a sick, pathetic male.

Moe

[Greegor]

Moe > Hanson, you know that one of my
Moe > many interests is true crime.

But NOT when it comes to the Burglary felon Kent
or the convicted CHILD MOLESTER Gary Lee Burnore?

Gary's confession to Police was about
kissing the kid but later he came up
with a story that he woke up with the
teen on top of his shaft.

Why haven't you expressed an opinion
on THAT story, Maureen?

Kent says the scanned records were faked.

But how do you suppose he explains the
NC Corrections listing that's online?




Gary Lee's Official ONLINE NC Department Of Corrections web page

[Kent Wills]

On Tue, 29 May 2012 11:08:56 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Moe > Hanson, you know that one of my
>Moe > many interests is true crime.
>
>But NOT when it comes to the Burglary felon Kent
>or the convicted CHILD MOLESTER Gary Lee Burnore?

You've openly admitted I committed no such crime, and you had to
LIE about Gary, claiming he plead guilty to a felony when he was
charged with a misdemeanor.
Let your shrink know that your deeply rooted psychological NEED
to lie has gotten worse, Greg. He or she may be able to help you.

[Greegor]

Moe > Hanson, you know that one of my
Moe > many interests is true crime.

G > But NOT when it comes to the Burglary felon Kent
G > or the convicted CHILD MOLESTER Gary Lee Burnore?

KBW > You've openly admitted I committed no such crime,

Does repeating that lie over and over comfort you, Kent?

KBW > and you had to LIE about Gary, claiming he
KBW > plead guilty to a felony when he was
KBW > charged with a misdemeanor.

Where did I claim that Gary was charged with a felony?
Oh wait, you're Kent Wills, famous usenet liar.

[Kent Wills]

On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:27:14 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Moe > Hanson, you know that one of my
>Moe > many interests is true crime.
>
>G > But NOT when it comes to the Burglary felon Kent
>G > or the convicted CHILD MOLESTER Gary Lee Burnore?
>
>KBW > You've openly admitted I committed no such crime,
>
>Does repeating that lie over and over comfort you, Kent?
>

Whereas I'm not lying, the answer would need to be no since it's
not possible to be comforted by that which exists solely within your
drug addled delusions.
I've posted the MIDs for some of the posts where your open
admission can be found. Each and every time, you ran away from the
matter.

>KBW > and you had to LIE about Gary, claiming he
>KBW > plead guilty to a felony when he was
>KBW > charged with a misdemeanor.
>
>Where did I claim that Gary was charged with a felony?

In almost every post.

>Oh wait, you're Kent Wills, famous usenet liar.

Yet you are never able to cite a single lie from me, ever,
without you having to lie about what has been posted.

[Greegor]

Why did you claim that this young man is a girl, Kent?

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973

Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985

[Greegor]

KBW > And I've never claimed the man you reference is female.

bsr > Flail Kunt, flail.

----------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/6a551084250011f0?hl=en
Will you stalk everyone with his name, the same as you're doing
with that gal from Facebook, Sean Bilyeu?
------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/c92a908b7f8bde1f?hl=en
Aug 2010 Greg posted Bilyeu's Facebook link, still active.
------------------------------

Why did Kent even bother with this really lame deception?
Why's gender of Kent's teen accomplice a sensitive subject?

Was their relationship more than criminal partners?

[Kent Wills]

On Thu, 31 May 2012 03:12:22 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Why did you claim that this young man is a girl, Kent?
>

Since you removed my answer in your reply, once again I'll state,

I've never claimed the man you reference is female.

Oh wait, due to the brain damage your use and abuse of illegal
drugs has given you, everyone with the same first and last name are
all the same person. As such, you firmly believe the male named Sean
Bilyeu and the female of the same name, whose Facebook page you
OBSESSIVELY linked to for weeks, are the same person.
Let your shrink know about how you still have this delusion,
Greg.

>http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973
>
>Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
>Offender Number 6157973
>Sex M
>Birth Date 12/18/1985
>

Feel free to post the MID and/or Google link where I claimed the
man you mention is female. Just one is all I ask.
And to ruin the LIE you want to post, we're referring the male
you list above. We're not discussing the female with the Facebook
page you OBSESSIVELY linked to for several weeks.
Now, where's the MID and/or Google link?

[Greegor]

> >Why did you claim that this young man is a girl, Kent?

>      Since you removed my answer in your reply, once again I'll state,
> I've never claimed the man you reference is female.

Yet another Kent Wills blatant lie.

It must have been a touchy subject.

[Greegor]

G > Why did you claim that this young man is a girl, Kent?

KBW > Since you removed my answer in your reply, once again I'll
state,
KBW > I've never claimed the man you reference is female.

G > Yet another Kent Wills blatant lie.
G > It must have been a touchy subject.

Why did you even BOTHER to try the
deception that Bilyeu was/is female, Kent?

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973

Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985

After you were ridiculed for the deception that
your accomplice Bilyeu was/is female, you
switched to claiming that you never made such a claim.

YOU raised the issue of your accomplice's gender.
What possible difference would their gender make, Kent?

Was your relationship with Bilyeu more than criminal mentor/mentee?

[Kent Wills]

On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:18:46 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
wrote:


Context restored at no additional cost.

Again you lose, Greg. But then, you lose at everything you've
ever tried in life, so another failure shouldn't come as a surprise.

>>
>>> >Why did you claim that this young man is a girl, Kent?
>>

>>>      Since you removed my answer in your reply, once again I'll state,

>>> I've never claimed the man you reference is female.
>>

>>>Yet another Kent Wills blatant lie.
>>

>>It must have been a touchy subject.
>
>Why did you even BOTHER to try the
>deception that Bilyeu was/is female, Kent?
>

First, you aren't me. You can reply to your own posts addressing
yourself as Kent, or anyone else, but you will remain the uneducated,
unemployed, loser you are. Accept this TRUTH about yourself and move
on.
Second, I didn't.
The Facebook page you linked to for weeks claimed, and maybe
claims, Sean is female. Contrary to your latest drug induced (see sig
for the C&P of your open admission to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs) delusion, I don't run Facebook. This means I couldn't claim
someone is a specific gender. Only the person who set up the account
can make the claim.
While it is possible the Sean you were so OBSESSED with lied, I
can't think of any reason for it. When asked if you could, you ran
away to HIDE from the matter.

>http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973
>
>Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
>Offender Number 6157973
>Sex M
>Birth Date 12/18/1985
>
>After you were ridiculed for the deception that
>your accomplice Bilyeu was/is female, you
>switched to claiming that you never made such a claim.

I've never claimed the male you cite is female.
Offer the MID and/or Google link to one post where I have. Just
one is all I ask. You are free to post the MIDs and/or links to more
than one if you wish.
Since this is another of your MANY drug induced lies, you'll
never offer anything. If you do, it will be PROVED that I was
referring to the juvenile (according to you) female (according to her
Facebook page) whose page you OBSESSIVELY linked to for weeks.

>
>YOU raised the issue of your accomplice's gender.

Since I had no accomplice (a crime would need to be committed to
have one, and you've openly admitted I have no convictions), I could
not have done as you LIE and claim I did.
Why are you so UNABLE to be honest, Greg? What is at the core of
your deeply rooted psychological NEED to lie? I've asked this of you
MANY times, but you've always opted to run away and HIDE from it.

>What possible difference would their gender make, Kent?
>

Aside from ensuring more people KNOW you are psychologically
UNABLE to be honest in most cases, probably none. Odd that you're so
focused on it.

>Was your relationship with Bilyeu more than criminal mentor/mentee?

Since there was no mentorship as you suggest, I would have to
answer no.
Nice attempt to throw in a LIE with your question. Of course, as
with everything you ever try in life, you FAILED.
You still haven't explained how it feels to lose at EVERYTHING
you ever try. It's like your TERRIFIED of explaining it.