NASA - Earth Observatory - Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[Chom Noamsky]

On 1/30/2013 9:19 AM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
> http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

Dark places like North Korea, and most of sub-Saharan Africa seem to be
contributing very little to global emissions. Maybe we should aspire to
be them...

[emoneyjoe]

If that is supposed to be about urban
heat islands, it is bad science, there can
be lights and lots of grass and trees and
weeds and flowers and scrub brush and
no UHI.

But there can be no lights, and lots
of pavement and buildings with surfaces
that are dry, causing a loss of evaporative
cooling near the weather service recording
stations, and giving temperature readings
as much as 8 degrees F higher than if
there was normal landscape.

Dry UHI vanishes during rain, and
is less when windy, completely unlike
any premise of UHI that might be due
to lights.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 12:19 pm, Chom Noamsky <wea...@stew.yum> wrote:
> On 1/30/2013 9:19 AM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
>
> > Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
> >http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
> Dark places

dark cold places between your ears indicate no brain activity

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 12:35 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:19:32 -0800 (PST), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
>

> <columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
> >http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
>       If that is supposed to be about urban
> heat islands, it is bad science, there can
> be lights and lots of grass and trees and
> weeds and flowers and scrub brush and
> no UHI.
>
>      But there can be no lights, and lots
> of pavement and buildings with surfaces
> that are dry, causing a loss of evaporative
> cooling near the weather service recording
> stations, and giving temperature readings
> as much as 8 degrees F higher than if
> there was normal landscape.
>
>      Dry UHI vanishes during rain, and
> is less when windy, completely unlike
> any premise of UHI that might be due
> to lights.

oh you mean you think those bright spots are not urban locations.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 12:35 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:19:32 -0800 (PST), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
>

> <columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
> >http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
>       If that is supposed to be about urban
> heat islands, it is bad science, there can
> be lights and lots of grass and trees and
> weeds and flowers and scrub brush and
> no UHI.
>
>      But there can be no lights, and lots
> of pavement and buildings with surfaces
> that are dry, causing a loss of evaporative
> cooling near the weather service recording
> stations, and giving temperature readings
> as much as 8 degrees F higher than if
> there was normal landscape.
>
>      Dry UHI vanishes during rain, and
> is less when windy, completely unlike
> any premise of UHI that might be due
> to lights.

The key to such a nonsense reply is to ask if you think that the
bright spots are not indicators of urban locations? The obvious
answer is yes they are, which inherently means such an image is quite
helpful.

[emoneyjoe]

Lights don't tell what all the conditions
are, if there are trees, the lights give a
false impression, building roofs and
parking lots may have no lights showing
above at all.

The only way to treat UHI questions
is to compare the temperature with
known normal conditions a few miles
away.

I see times when the airport is as
much as 8 degrees F warmer than
where I live.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Like any image it tells a story its a snapshot in time, the night
lights indicate urban areas in 2012. The bad science kick in when
people like you have an emotional irrational illogical response and
expect such idiocy to dictate reality.

[emoneyjoe]

"Urban areas" do not necessarily equate
to UHI temperature anomalies, and large
areas of dry pavement can cause a lot of
temperature change near recording devices.

The bad science is trying to achieve
science with a faulty accumulation of data,
and expecting the world to get all excited
over nothing that hasn't been happening
long before you were born.

The idea that a city has to be a UHI
is faulty in itself, it is dryness that is the
big factor in UHIs, not the heat.
Dry is warmer if it replaces moist soil.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

One can correlate such information with other data, such as the study
below, from the "The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and
Reflection Radiometer(ASTER)" to determine a UHI profile, and a
relationship between vegetation and temp over time and determine the
impact of UHI mitigation measures. Thats called science.

http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_urban_heat_island_effect_in_Metro_Manila
ASTER-based study of the night-time urban heat island effect in
MetroManila

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 12:19 pm, Chom Noamsky <wea...@stew.yum> wrote:

dark skies = good observing

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

One can correlate such information with other data, such as the study
below, from the "The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and
Reflection Radiometer(ASTER)" to determine a UHI profile, and a
relationship between vegetation and temp over time and determine the
impact of UHI mitigation measures. Thats called science.

http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...

[emoneyjoe]

BS, because they don't give UHI
any weight in the data reduction.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 3, 7:20 am, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/bd3679b26ac16c5b

> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:49:42 -0800 (PST), columbiaaccidentinvestigation

But you claimed it wasnt science, and i gave you a clear path to make
a correlation between the image showing urban locations at night, a
UHI profile, and relationship between vegetation and temp over time
which directly addresses your supposed concerns. Now if you really
were interested in the science you would have admitted that, instead
you did not connect the two sources you played a stupid trolling game
and you were called out. Funny how quickly i can dismiss the myths
put forward by the lame workings of a troll.

Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_urban_heat_island_effect_in_Metro_Manila

[emoneyjoe]

Because my old eyes are burning and
I have such a slow connection, I decline
to read your BS.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 3, 12:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:<>.

did you say something of relevance?

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

>        Because my old eyes are burning and
> I have such a slow connection, I decline
> to read your BS.

UHI determination method posted, you mean the truth hurt, and now you
are crying as you have been proven to be wrong.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 3, 12:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:"  Because

my old eyes are burning"

dont worry, its not like the movie the truth wont hurt.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vnzMIrkwtlY/T7Va5UXhJpI/AAAAAAAALFI/1SP031HuUgQ/s1600/face-melting.jpg

[emoneyjoe]

This is the second response by you to
a post that did not require a response.

But keep on saying that warming is
causing the cooling, that shows how you think.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 9, 3:19 am, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:"that shows
how you think. "

Pure science - a correlation between the image showing urban locations

at night, a UHI profile, and relationship between vegetation and temp
over time

Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[emoneyjoe]

AGW is garbage science no matter how
close it matches reality.

Predictions are being made that are
so far off, guessing would be more accurate.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 3, 12:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
old eyes are burning"

Pure science - a correlation between the image showing urban locations

at night, a UHI profile, and relationship between vegetation and temp
over time

Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[gordo]

On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:05:38 -0500, emoneyjoe <emon...@iglou.com>
wrote:

What prediction exactly are you talking about that is so far off? Can
you post the prediction from the IPCC report and the outcome?

[emoneyjoe]

On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:44:16 -0800, gordo <grme...@shaw.ca.remove>
wrote:

A lot of goofy stuff before 2000, especially
a graph by Dr. Dorsey showing CO2 being
480 PPM by 2010.


You warmies are goofy as hell and are
directly responsible for such absolutely
insane garbage as;

http://apen4ej.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Coal-Blooded-Putting-Profits-Before-People.pdf


How in hell can we cut back on coal
before alternate energy sources become
available.

I switched most of my space heating
to natural gas, so I have done all I can,
the above url sends a scary message,
people expecting the impossible.

[gordo]

On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:25:09 -0500, emoneyjoe <emon...@iglou.com>

Saying a lot of goofy stuff is hardley good enough. Where in the IPCC
report is all this goofy stuff.

>
> You warmies are goofy as hell and are

Warmies? Did you even look at the site?

"Environmental issues are not isolated instances. They are a broad
national concern with civil rights implications. Historically, people
of color have disproportionately experienced negative outcomes
associated with their physical environment."

Did you disagree with the opening statement?

>directly responsible for such absolutely
>insane garbage as;
>
>http://apen4ej.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Coal-Blooded-Putting-Profits-Before-People.pdf
>
>
> How in hell can we cut back on coal
>before alternate energy sources become
>available.
>
> I switched most of my space heating
>to natural gas, so I have done all I can,
>the above url sends a scary message,
>people expecting the impossible.

"This report focuses on the role that coal-fired power plants have in
the inequitable health outcomes of low income communities and
communities of color in the U.S. and in the contribution of greenhouse
gasses that drive climate change, the consequences of which also
disproportionately impact people of color and low income communities
globally."
>

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 12:35 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:19:32 -0800 (PST), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
>

> <columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
> >http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
>       If that is supposed to be about urban
> heat islands, it is bad science, there can
> be lights and lots of grass and trees and
> weeds and flowers and scrub brush and
> no UHI.
>
>      But there can be no lights, and lots
> of pavement and buildings with surfaces
> that are dry, causing a loss of evaporative
> cooling near the weather service recording
> stations, and giving temperature readings
> as much as 8 degrees F higher than if
> there was normal landscape.
>
>      Dry UHI vanishes during rain, and
> is less when windy, completely unlike
> any premise of UHI that might be due
> to lights.

Pure science - a correlation between the image showing urban
locations
at night, a UHI profile, and relationship between vegetation and temp
over time

Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 9:19 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 11, 4:25 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

All that whining about land use and none of the denialists are
interested in such a thread i wonder why?

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

[Falcon]

On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:17:43 -0800 (PST), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:

<ignore>

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)
Comparing CMIP5 simulations with observations
http://bit.ly/U8Q3j5

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 16, 12:39 am, Falcon <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:"ignore"

Yes i know you ignore pure science, but that does not work as you cant
have it both ways..... :)

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 9:19 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

none of the denialsts care to explore the real science. A correlation

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 9:19 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

bump

[tj Frazir]

top of moon,,60 mile high 4000 MPH.

wieghless to the moon. 5000 pound to the moon

BUT the moon and apollo orbit the earth at 2300 MPH.
3600 mph is excape thats 40 ton..on earth apollo at excape earth from
the moon .
at 6300 MPH is 3000 mph faster then excape at 80 ton going up vrs 5000
pounds to the moon.

Re: WAKE UP YOU FOOLS!!! The NASA missions to SPACE are completely ...

Group: sci.physics Date: Thu, Feb 21, 2013, 9:18pm From:
Gravity...@webtv.net (tj Frazir)
The moon is at 2300 MPH.
  Apollo is 60 miles over the moon at 4000 mph.
  But still in earth orbit .
Respect to earth orbit speed 2300 mph..
apollo is at excape speed as it orbits the moon at 4000 mph its in earth
orbit at 6300 MPH thats excape from earth twice from its 2300 mph earth
orbit.
    at som point its under the moon but at 0 mph in its earth
orbit. AT 0 mph earth orbit the thing is 40 ton on earth but 5 ton there
sitting in space not in earth orbit in a freefall or on a scale at 5000
pounds.
  wieghtless to the moon as it orbits but NOT to earth as its speed
over earth is 0 at one point and 6300 MPH th next.
  Its imposible for rocs and nasa to orbit the moon near the egde of
excape .
    You cant orbit at 2300 mph a moonthat orbits earth at 2300
MPH without orbiting earth and moon at the same time.
  You cant ignore the fact yor in orbit of the earth when you orbit
the moon.
  Your in orbit of the earthh at 2300 mph wieghless if speed was 0
the you wiegh something.
    And point your earth orbit strait down or strait up at 4000
MPH from your 2300 mph earth orbit as you orbit the moon at 60 miles up
at 4000 mph.
The moon is at 2300 MPH.
  Apollo is 60 miles over the moon at 4000 mph.
  But still in earth orbit .
Respect to earth orbit speed 2300 mph..
apollo is at excape speed as it orbits the moon at 4000 mph its in earth
orbit at 6300 MPH thats excape from earth twice from its 2300 mph earth
orbit.
    at som point its under the moon but at 0 mph in its earth
orbit. AT 0 mph earth orbit the thing is 40 ton on earth but 5 ton there
sitting in space not in earth orbit in a freefall or on a scale at 5000
pounds.
  wieghtless to the moon as it orbits but NOT to earth as its speed
over earth is 0 at one point and 6300 MPH th next.
  Its imposible for rocs and nasa to orbit the moon near the egde of
excape .
    You cant orbit at 2300 mph a moonthat orbits earth at 2300
MPH without orbiting earth and moon at the same time.
  You cant ignore the fact yor in orbit of the earth when you orbit
the moon.
  Your in orbit of the earthh at 2300 mph wieghless if speed was 0
the you wiegh something.
    And point your earth orbit strait down or strait up at 4000
MPH from your 2300 mph earth orbit as you orbit the moon at 60 miles up
at 4000 mph.
http://community.webtv.net/GravityPhysics/WhaleSteamEngineA




http://community.webtv.net/GravityPhysics/WhaleSteamEngineA

[tj Frazir]

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 10:19 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

[1treePetrifiedForestLane]

has anyone seen an explanation of the anomoly,
that winters, nights and winter-nights are warming,
more than summers, days and summer-days?

thus:
"...About two-thirds of the clear-sky flux is due to water vapor, and
one-third is due to CO2, both in summer and winter."

WtF?

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Dont be so snide,
for those far and wide,
cannot hide,
from the dark side

Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

> On Mar 20, 10:04 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com> wrote: "WtF?"

[emoneyjoe]

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:04:38 -0700 (PDT), 1treePetrifiedForestLane
<Spac...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>has anyone seen an explanation of the anomoly,
>that winters, nights and winter-nights are warming,
>more than summers, days and summer-days?

Yes, that is what some warmies claim,
it doesn't get as cold, so they say it is getting
hotter, that shows backward thinking, like
left is right, up is down.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Mar 21, 4:26 am, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:", that

shows backward thinking, like left is right, up is down."

On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:"Because my

old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
read your BS."

come on old man, try to keep up a correlation between the image

showing urban locations at night, a UHI profile, and relationship
between vegetation and temp over time

Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[josephus]

all I can say is the temperature record is accelerating upward. that
is not good news. the SLOPE is much larger than the BEST FIT SLOPE.
that means the record is accelerating upward.
I predict it will continue to do this for the near future. I think
2020 should be part of this process/
input data FROM 1990.DAT
This data is XX.XX C/100
F digits
count = 23 items.
A 12.510388064+ B 0.022569174 * DATE
F(N) = A + B*DATE = AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OVER TIME
no matter whether 30yr averages or over all data, the slope is small
and positive
B*30 = 0.68 average digits increase
Correl_Coef := 0.801782

countA 12 countB 11
Lower Upper
1 1992 0.26818 1990 0.11696
2 1993 0.20075 1991 0.06439
3 1996 0.08846 1994 0.05668
4 1999 0.05617 1995 0.04411
5 2000 0.13874 1997 0.18897
6 2007 0.03672 1998 0.03640
7 2008 0.03929 2001 0.08870
8 2009 0.00186 2002 0.06613
9 2010 0.02443 2003 0.10356
10 2011 0.15700 2004 0.06099
11 2012 0.02957 2005 0.15842
12 2006 0.05585

sum of squares A and B 1.14917734459823E-0001 1.71463293162333E-0001

upper SQRT(sum squareA/12) = 0.097859480
lower SQRT(sum squareB/11) = 0.124850199

upper count 12 1.04115
lower count 11 1.04115
lower count < upper count
The sums are the same because of least square algorithm.
Gaussian least squares is the line through all the points.

I X Y Y_Calc dispersion stdv
1 1990 57.54 57.42 0.11695656 1.19514799
2 1991 57.51 57.45 0.06438739 0.65795759
3 1992 57.20 57.47 -0.26818179 -2.14802851
4 1993 57.29 57.49 -0.20075096 -1.60793464
5 1994 57.57 57.51 0.05667987 0.57919649
6 1995 57.58 57.54 0.04411069 0.45075545
7 1996 57.47 57.56 -0.08845848 -0.70851693
8 1997 57.77 57.58 0.18897235 1.93105815
9 1998 57.64 57.60 0.03640317 0.37199434
10 1999 57.57 57.63 -0.05616600 -0.44986713
11 2000 57.51 57.65 -0.13873517 -1.11121308
12 2001 57.76 57.67 0.08869565 0.90635728
13 2002 57.76 57.69 0.06612648 0.67572890
14 2003 57.82 57.72 0.10355731 1.05822456
15 2004 57.80 57.74 0.06098813 0.62322149
16 2005 57.92 57.76 0.15841896 1.61884120
17 2006 57.84 57.78 0.05584978 0.57071409
18 2007 57.77 57.81 -0.03671939 -0.29410757
19 2008 57.79 57.83 -0.03928856 -0.31468562
20 2009 57.85 57.85 -0.00185774 -0.01487972
21 2010 57.85 57.87 -0.02442691 -0.19564975
22 2011 57.74 57.90 -0.15699608 -1.25747564
23 2012 57.89 57.92 -0.02956526 -0.23680585
some mean standard deviations
all data points(23) mean 57.671304 std dv 0.1909142
Yc data points(23) mean 11.241017 std dv 22.9431676
upper data points(12) mean 0.045267 std dv 0.0555092
lower data points(11) mean 0.09465 std dv 0.0853927

VAR TOTAL 9.89530235528946E-0010
MY variance = var/23 = 4.30230537186498E-0011 sqrt(var/N)=0.000006559
my coef = 1-var ->0.99999344
this works because the scatter is small in general

Intercept is 12.510388064 Sigma A is 7.345502918
Slope is 0.022569174 Sigma B is 0.003670896

program Correlation coefficient is 0.801782

My linear data is +
The data is *
Collisions are %

57.20| 57.56| 57.92|
--------------------------------------------------------
1990 18 | + * | |

1991 17 | + * | |

1992 1 | * + | |

1993 4 | * + | |

1994 20 | + * |

1995 21 | + |* |

1996 14 | * +| |

1997 31 | |+ * |

1998 24 | | + * |

1999 20 | * + |

2000 17 | * | + |

2001 31 | | + * |

2002 31 | | + * |

2003 34 | | + * |

2004 33 | | + * |

2005 40 | | + *

2006 35 | | + * |

2007 31 | | * + |

2008 32 | | * + |

2009 36 | | % |

2010 36 | | *+ |

2011 30 | | * + |

2012 38 | | *+|

--------------------------------------------------------
4 lines
| *
| *
* |* * *
* * * ** |** * ******* *
1111111111|22222222223333333333
1234567890123456789|01234567890123456789

reploted against Y_calc
Ymax 0.27 Ymin 0.19 offset 57.54 -> 57.89 -> 5.84399999999790E+0001
A small prediction : 2013 to 2020 will be the same trend
center-max center
center+max
1990 57.27| -0.27 57.54| +0.27 57.81|
2012 57.62 -0.27 57.89 +0.27 58.16
2020 57.95 -0.27 58.22 +0.27 58.49
The data is *

-0.27| -0.04| 0.19|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------|-----------------------------------------------------------
111111111122222222223333333333444444444455555555556
0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
1990 50 | + * |

1991 43 | + * |

1992 1 | * + |

1993 8 | * + |

1994 42 | + * |

1995 40 | + * |

1996 23 | * + |

1997 60 | + *

1998 39 | + * |

1999 27 | * + |

2000 16 | * + |

2001 46 | + * |

2002 43 | + * |

2003 48 | + * |

2004 43 | + * |

2005 55 | + * |

2006 42 | + * |

2007 30 | * |

2008 30 | * |

2009 34 | + * |

2010 31 | +* |

2011 14 | * + |

2012 31 | +* |

--------|-------------------------------------------------------------
111111111122222222223333333333444444444455555555556
0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
4 lines
|
| *
|** **
* * * * * * |** * ** ** * * * * *
process end

[josephus]

I have this TURBO 7.0 compiler under windows XP. and I have programs
and data. I have been examining that NOAA data. and noticed that the
region from 1990 to 2012 is almost all above the BEST FIT LINE. I
plotted that data and it is wicked bad news. it is MUCH HIGHER
SLOPE than the BEST FIT. that implies it is accelerating upward. no
cooling. no stalling. just wicked upward motion.

josephus

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 16, 7:30 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 12:39 am, Falcon <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:"ignore"
>
> Yes i know you ignore pure science, but that does not work as you cant
> have it both ways..... :)
> Pure science - a correlation between the image showing urban
> locations
> at night, a UHI profile, and relationship between vegetation and temp
> over time
>

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[josephus]

and OKC oklahoma city turned ON ALL ITS LIGHTS, that is why the
SENATOR is IMHOFF. go figure
josephus

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Inhofe does not like the documentation of emissions from local
industry, which means he thinks the local residents dont deserve to
know what kind of pollution is occurring in their neighborhood. He is
a denaislist troll.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Jan 30, 10:19 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

Pure science - a correlation between the image showing urban locations
at night, a UHI profile, and relationship between vegetation and temp

over time.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Mar 29, 5:21 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 10:19 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
>
> <columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
> Pure science - a correlation between the image showing urban locations
> at night, a UHI profile, and relationship between vegetation and temp
> over time.
>

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Mar 30, 7:12 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Apr 10, 5:22 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.phphttp://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...

> ASTER-based study of the night-time urban heat island effect in
> MetroManila

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
read your BS."

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c


All im saying is that one can make a simple correlation between the

image showing urban locations at night, a UHI profile, and

relationship between vegetation and temp over time and that would
address your so called fears.

Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[emoneyjoe]

You are unbelievably stupid, and so is
anybody that thinks the heat from UHI is
the problem when it is the higher temperature
data that makes temperatures look higher
than they actually are.

Can somebody else make this stupid
idiot understand that images of the
light cover does not tell anything about
thermometer readings being higher
than they would be in the presence
of normal and natural moisture and
transpiration vegetation?

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

Come on silly, one main denialist talking point has been location
where the temperature data is gathered, which is at the premise of
your idiotic argument that " temperatures look higher than they
actually are.". Once again if a person like you had a genuine
interest in the subject, you would understand the benefit of making a
correlation amongst the image showing urban locations at night, a UHI
profile, and relationship between vegetation and temp over time. Your
old eyes are burnt as you cant read, and now you are limited to stupid
idiotic knee jerk reactions prompted from the central command of your
denialist cult.

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Apr 14, 6:14 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Apr 14, 4:55 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
> old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
> read your BS."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c
>
> All im saying is that one can make a simple correlation between the
> image showing urban locations at night, a UHI profile, and
> relationship between vegetation and temp over time and that would
> address your so called fears.
>

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Apr 21, 6:29 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 4:55 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
>
> <columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
> > old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
> > read your BS."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c
>
> > All im saying is that one can make a simple correlation between the

> > image showing urban locations atnight, a UHI profile, and

> > relationship between vegetation and temp over time and that would
> > address your so called fears.
>

> >EarthatNight2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
> >http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...
> > ASTER-based study of thenight-time urban heat island effect in
> > MetroManila
>
> EarthatNight2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
> http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...
> ASTER-based study of thenight-time urban heat island effect in

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On May 1, 11:24 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 6:29 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 14, 4:55 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
>
> > <columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
> > > old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
> > > read your BS."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c
>
> > > All im saying is that one can make a simple correlation between the
> > > image showing urban locations atnight, a UHI profile, and
> > > relationship between vegetation and temp over time and that would
> > > address your so called fears.
>
> > >EarthatNight2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
> > >http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...
> > > ASTER-based study of thenight-time urban heat island effect in
> > > MetroManila
>
> > EarthatNight2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
> >http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...
> > ASTER-based study of thenight-time urban heat island effect in
> > MetroManila
>

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php
>
> http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On May 5, 6:06 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Apr 14, 4:55 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
> old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
> read your BS."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c
>
> All im saying is that one can make a simple correlation between the
> image showing urban locations at night, a UHI profile, and
> relationship between vegetation and temp over time and that would
> address your so called fears.
>

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

>
> http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...
> ASTER-based study of the night-time urban heat island effect in
> MetroManila

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Apr 14, 4:55 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
> old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
> read your BS."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c
>
> All im saying is that one can make a simple correlation between the
> image showing urban locations at night, a UHI profile, and
> relationship between vegetation and temp over time and that would
> address your so called fears.
>

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

>
> http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...
> ASTER-based study of the night-time urban heat island effect in
> MetroManila

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Apr 14, 4:55 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
> old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
> read your BS."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c
>
> All im saying is that one can make a simple correlation between the
> image showing urban locations at night, a UHI profile, and
> relationship between vegetation and temp over time and that would
> address your so called fears.
>

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Apr 14, 4:55 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
<columbiaaccidentinvestigat...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" Because my
> old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
> read your BS."http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c
>
> All im saying is that one can make a simple correlation between the
> image showing urban locations at night, a UHI profile, and
> relationship between vegetation and temp over time and that would
> address your so called fears.
>

> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Viewshttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

>
> http://www.academia.edu/506496/ASTER-based_study_of_the_night-time_ur...
> ASTER-based study of the night-time urban heat island effect in
> MetroManila

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On May 5, 6:06 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:19:32 AM UTC-8, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
> Earth at Night 2012: Hemisphere Views
>
> http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/NightLights/page2.php

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

bump

[columbiaaccidentinvestigation]

On Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:54:37 PM UTC-8, emoneyjoe wrote:"Because my old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to read your BS."

na, but i will know use that quote in your threads....