The United Nations reports that people and emissions are almost
certainly to blame for global warming. The administration pooh-poohed
such scare tactics, and then scrambled to learn if any U.N. members
had undercover CIA spouses they could out. Meanwhile, conservative "no-
think" tanks were mobilized to discredit any science that constipates
the Republican agenda.
They're the intellectual fiber that gets the message out -- brainy
bran muffins for the masses.
Can we trust the administration's stance that the threat of rising
temperatures is just a lot of hot air? Not according to a very high
government source -- meaning his position, not what he's smoking.
Republicans have long known that the climate is a-changing, he claims,
according to a secret White House memo.
So why have we virtually ignored investing in alternative forms of
energy? Why have we awarded huge tax credits to buyers of gas-guzzling
Hummers? To help Big Business benefactors? No. The memo reveals
another reason why we're burning more and more oil from countries that
hate us...a very sinister reason. Google a map of the last election,
and it's obvious that global warming has a striking political benefit.
Hint: it's not the Red States that are on the coasts. As temperatures
soar, who would a rise in sea level affect most? You got it -- global
warming is an administration plot to submerge both coasts and flush
away Blue State voters.
The rest:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-tenowich/global-warmings-cool_b_43457.html
>
> == The UN, who is directing and paying some 1371 selected scientists
> to sing AGW in their IPCC, out of a total of ~ 40'000 climate scientists
Crackpot, ignore
>Global Warming's Cool!
>
>The rest:
>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-tenowich/global-warmings-cool_b_43457.html
Do you have any more purely political blogs to share,
why is this garbage even in a newsgroup that should not
be political at all because of the possible major effects on
every person on the planet, either from natural disasters
or destroyed economies.
Joe Fischer
ROTFLMAO
> Do you have any more purely political blogs to share,
> why is this garbage even in a newsgroup that should not
> be political at all because of the possible major effects on
> every person on the planet, either from natural disasters
> or destroyed economies.
>
> Joe Fischer
Crackpot, ignore
> Lodo, is your redirecting your tripe to "alt.fuck" a nu FU to "Awe Shit"?
> ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs and guzzle anothe bottle of Nightrain.
> ahahahaha... ahahaha...
Crackpot Hanson. Ignore.
moron, killfile.
> Lodo, is your redirecting your tripe to "alt.fuck" a nu FU to "Awe Shit"?
> ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs and guzzle anothe bottle of Nightrain.
> ahahahaha... ahahaha...
Crackpot Hanson. Ignore.
> >Crackpot, ignore
>
> moron, killfile.
Crackpot quintal, ignore.
He morphs a lot. If you ignore authors over 20 characters, you can
usually eliminate him.
Crackpot Bill Ward, Ignore.
PS:
Lodo, is your redirecting your tripe to "alt.fuck" a nu FU to "Awe Shit"?
ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs and guzzle anothe bottle of Nightrain.
ahahahaha... ahahaha... and further more "Awe Shit"... just because
you get out of your basement to piss into the snow with the urge to eat
it, does not mean that other people should learn that too, you silly old
drunkard.... ahahaha... ahahanson...
On Mar 18, 11:43 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> ahahaha... So you, "Awe Shit", must have already checked that out
> for yourself then. Is your time for RIP that near?. Well go and guzzle
> another bottle of Nightrain while you still can. You can't take it with
> Lodo, is your redirecting your tripe to "alt.fuck" a nu FU to "Awe Shit"?
a Libertarian is
adj.
1. Concerned chiefly or only with oneself: "Selfish men were . . .
trying to make capital for themselves out of the sacred cause of human
rights" (Maria Weston Chapman).
2. Arising from, characterized by, or showing selfishness: a
selfish whim.
Devoid of consideration for the selfishness of others.
Absorbed primarily or only in one's own interests or activities.
adj.
1. Serving one's own interests, especially without concern for the
needs or interests of others.
2. Exhibiting concern solely for one's own interests: a speech full
of self-serving comments.
adj., -i·er, -i·est.
1. Excessively desirous of acquiring or possessing, especially
wishing to possess more than what one needs or deserves.
2. Wanting to eat or drink more than one can reasonably consume;
gluttonous.
3. Extremely eager or desirous: greedy for the opportunity to prove
their ability.
adjective
1. Having a strong urge to obtain or possess something, especially
material wealth, in quantity: acquisitive, avaricious, avid, covetous,
grasping, hungry. Informal grabby. See desire, give/take/reciprocity.
2. Wanting to eat or drink more than one can reasonably consume:
edacious, gluttonous, hoggish, piggish, ravenous, voracious. See
desire, ingestion.
3. Having an insatiable appetite for an activity or pursuit: avid,
edacious, gluttonous, omnivorous, rapacious, ravenous, unappeasable,
voracious. See desire.
adj.
1. Taking by force; plundering.
2. Greedy; ravenous. See synonyms at voracious.
3. Subsisting on live prey.
Impossible to appease or satisfy: unappeasable thirst and hunger.
Meaning #1: not to be placated or appeased or moved by entreaty
Synonyms: grim, inexorable, relentless, stern, unforgiving,
unrelenting
IN BRIEF: Wanting or taking all that one can get with no thought of
what others need.
adj.
1. Shunning the society of others; not sociable.
2. Hostile to or disruptive of the established social order; marked
by or engaging in behavior that violates accepted mores: gangs
engaging in vandalism and other antisocial behavior.
3. Antagonistic toward or disrespectful of others; rude.
Behaving in a manner that violates the social or legal norms of
society.
IN BRIEF: Thinking and acting as if one's own desires and interests
are more important than the interests and desires of others.
> Definition of a Libertarian.... a Libertarian is an anarchist who wants
> police protection from his slaves.
If the anarchists of the world would just get organized, they might get
somewhere.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Lion+Kuntz%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
Results 1 - 100 of about 11,400 for "Lion Kuntz".
So how much is "Lion Kuntz" paying you to puff up his name? I have a
few other names I might want puffed up if your PR rates are cheap, and
apparently they must be.
says Left leaning NY Times & Glen Beck CNN-HLN on 18-Mar-07:....
based on research of sober scientists who are NOTpaid by
anyone like the IPCC Global Warmers who are on the payroll
of the crooked UN paymasters, who took $billions in bribes
from Saddam Hussein, and who try to advance their Global
Govenrment agenda by spreading false fear and doom.
Has anybody more details on this aside these 2 desperately
lonely welfare items who are getting hot under their collar and
post every night, inadvertently moving the US evermore to the
Right, and becoming so terribly excited that they take a few
steps closer to their plot at
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/21b72828229da0a0
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/6ab1baf9ab204bd4
It was discussed openly over 3 decades and the decision has been made
that the debate portion is closed so that emergency response actions
can go forward.
There is no new evidence and no surprises. It has been found that the
richest corporations are engaged in criminal frauds to protect their
dirty pollution sources of income and refuse to change to clean
industry investments. Career criminal accomplices in the sciences have
been exposed, identified, debunked by courtroom evidence. Paid
accomplices through front organizations regularly post deceptions to
continue the "appearance of debate" when the debate is over. No new
evidence accompanies the propaganda piece above.
Divide to conquer worked since Caesar's time, why give up the tried &
true now?
> On Mar 19, 5:12 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>> ******** Global COOLING imminent ************
>>
>> says Left leaning NY Times & Glen Beck CNN-HLN on 18-Mar-07:.... based
>> on research of sober scientists who are NOTpaid by anyone like the IPCC
>> Global Warmers who are on the payroll of the crooked UN paymasters, who
>> took $billions in bribes from Saddam Hussein, and who try to advance
>> their Global Govenrment agenda by spreading false fear and doom.
>>
>> Has anybody more details on this aside these 2 desperately lonely
>> welfare items who are getting hot under their collar and post every
>> night, inadvertently moving the US evermore to the Right, and becoming
>> so terribly excited that they take a few steps closer to their plot
> Lying reich-winger.
Boy, now _that's_ a rebuttal! You tell 'em. Sparky.
Meanwhile....
Australian drought 'worst in 1,000 years': expert
Nov 7 01:59 AM US/Eastern 2007
The world's driest inhabited continent was in the grip of the worst
drought in 1,000 years, a river management expert told Australia's
political leaders.
Prime Minister John Howard and three state premiers were presented
with the assessment by an expert on the country's most significant
river system at a crisis drought summit in Canberra.
The drought has already been described variously as the worst in
living memory, the worst in a century and the worst since white
settlement more than two centuries ago, and Howard said he could not
verify the latest claim.
"You say worst drought in a thousand years, I don't think anybody
really knows that," he said, adding that he was not a scientist.
"It's a very bad drought."
But he acknowledged that the general manager of River Murray Water,
David Dreverman, made the dramatic prediction at the summit Howard
held with the premiers of three of the worst-affected states.
Howard called the summit as statistics showed that the country's
most important river system, within the Murray-Darling Basin, could
run out of water in six months, after six years of drought.
About 30 rivers and hundreds of tributaries run across the basin,
which feeds about 70 per cent of Australia's irrigated farmlands.
South Australian Premier Mike Rann said the assessment by Dreverman,
who also sits on the Murray Darling Basin Commission, was worrying.
"We were told at the meeting by the Murray-Darling commissioner that
we now face, not a one-in-100-year drought, but a one-in-1,000-year
drought," Rann told reporters. "So we are into uncharted territory."
The summit agreed to draw up contingency plans to secure water
supplies, with a working group of state and federal public servants
to report back by December 15.
The government also agreed to speed up the implementation of
proposals under the National Water Initiative, with permanent
interstate water trading to begin between New South Wales and
Victoria states on January 1 next year.