So few deniers posting these days...............

Dawlish

unread,

May 22, 2013, 2:59:22 PM5/22/13

to

..........and it's only the dregs of those who used to post.

I wonder why?

Tunderbar

unread,

May 22, 2013, 5:13:18 PM5/22/13

to

On May 22, 1:59 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> ..........and it's only the dregs of those who used to post.
>
> I wonder why?

I could say the same of the alarmists. You guys have stopped, well the
smarter ones of you guys have, because the war has been lost.

Our guys have stopped because the war has been won. LOL.

Google "climategate" for more info. LOL.

Dawlish

unread,

May 23, 2013, 3:14:18 AM5/23/13

to

The deluded actually believe stuff like this. It's truly hilarious. tundy thinks he has "guys". That's nice.

SunDancer

unread,

May 23, 2013, 4:29:13 AM5/23/13

to

Tunderbar wrote :

Well said, bang on! LOL LOL

--
(No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message. However,
a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.)

Dawlish

unread,

May 23, 2013, 4:37:07 AM5/23/13

to

Why not lean over and just say this to tundy in the seat in front. It would save us having to read it. You believe this stuff. That's no-one's fault but your own.

Monckton is the, 3rd Viscount of Brenchley

unread,

May 23, 2013, 6:35:13 AM5/23/13

to

On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:59:22 PM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
> ..........and it's only the dregs of those who used to post.
>
>
>
> I wonder why?

Because the topic, as to whether global warming is real, currently has much less meaning, since the IPCC has informed the World that global warming is not real, and has not happened for at least 17 years. However, watching fools like you argue with the IPCC findings, are rather comical......

Next

James

unread,

May 23, 2013, 12:03:14 PM5/23/13

to

"Tunderbar" <tdco...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12e39422-bb76-4ccc...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com

Isn't he cute?

erschro...@gmail.com

unread,

May 23, 2013, 2:39:03 PM5/23/13

to

On May 23, 6:35 am, "Monckton is the, 3rd Viscount of Brenchley"

Right. And NASA has informed the world that the moon landings were
not real. In some other universe.

Tunderbar

unread,

May 23, 2013, 3:31:19 PM5/23/13

to

On May 23, 5:35 am, "Monckton is the, 3rd Viscount of Brenchley"

I think you mean AGW or CAGW.

Global warming is real. It has warmed since the last glaciation period.

James

unread,

May 23, 2013, 9:49:15 PM5/23/13

to

<erschro...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b99b4f5a-1e7f-4f73...@s6g2000yqs.googlegroups.com

You want to help? Don't help.

Dawlish

unread,

May 24, 2013, 2:16:56 AM5/24/13

to

On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 7:59:22 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
> ..........and it's only the dregs of those who used to post.
>
>
>
> I wonder why?

Wed are down to tundy, jimmy-cut-and-paste, dancer, chomper, spinner occasionally and half-brain occasionally, very few others and a few racists and rednecks and spammers.

My original comment still applies: it's only the dregs of those who used to post and that is just excellent. It's hardly difficult playing whack-a-mole with those limited individuals.

Last Post

unread,

May 24, 2013, 5:47:06 AM5/24/13

to

Ø ——— Dawg Fish has zero knowledge of climate
——— beyond the morning newspaper.

josephus

unread,

May 24, 2013, 8:11:27 AM5/24/13

to

hey dumbfuck does the TREND of the average slopes not make sense to
this idiot. he claims the GW has stopped.
I know that the CENTROID is the TREND of the motion of the record.

josephus

--------------------------------------------------------
2013 39 | . * |

2011 39 | . * |

2009 38 | . * |

2007 37 | . * |

2005 36 | . * |

2003 35 | . * |

2001 34 | . * |

1999 33 | . * |

1997 32 | . * |

1995 31 | . * |

1993 30 | . * |

1991 30 | . * |

1989 29 | . * |

1987 28 | . * |

1985 28 | . * |

1983 29 | . * |

1981 28 | . * |

1979 28 | . * |

1977 28 | . * |

1975 28 | . * |

1973 29 | . * |

1971 29 | . * |

1969 30 | . * |

1967 30 | . * |

1965 30 | . * |

1963 31 | . * |

1961 30 | . * |

1959 30 | . * |

1957 29 | . * |

1955 29 | . * |

1953 29 | . * |

1951 28 | . * |

1949 28 | . * |

1947 27 | . * |

1945 26 | . * |

1943 24 | . * |

1941 22 | . * |

1939 21 | .* |

1937 19 | *. |

1935 16 | * . |

1933 15 | * . |

1931 13 | * . |

1929 10 | * . |

1927 10 | * . |

1925 7 | * . |

1923 5 | * . |

1921 3 | * . |

1919 1 | * . |

1917 1 | * . |

1915 2 | * . |

1913 1 | * . |

1911 1 | * . |

1909 3 | * . |

1907 5 | * . |

1905 6 | * . |

1903 9 | * . |

1901 11 | * . |

1899 7 | * . |

1897 5 | * . |

1895 1 | * . |

--------------------------------------------------------

--
I go sailing in the summer
and look at stars in the winter
Its not what you know that gets you in trouble
Its what you know that aint so. -- Josh Billings

Dawlish

unread,

May 24, 2013, 8:35:07 AM5/24/13

to

I know others are looking at this and thinking the same. All you have to do is to look at "Avoid, dodge, deny", to see how denier numbers have dwindled. I do hope wherever they've gone deprives them of the oxygen of discussion; a lack that they find so hard to cope with on here.

Or, of course, that they have realised the error of their ways.........

emoneyjoe

unread,

May 24, 2013, 8:43:24 AM5/24/13

to

On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:11:27 -0500, josephus <dog...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>Monckton is the, 3rd Viscount of Brenchley wrote:
>> On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:59:22 PM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
>>> ..........and it's only the dregs of those who used to post.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I wonder why?
>>
>> Because the topic, as to whether global warming is real, currently has much less meaning, since the IPCC has informed the World that global warming is not real, and has not happened for at least 17 years. However, watching fools like you argue with the IPCC findings, are rather comical......
>>
>> Next
>>
>
>
>hey dumbfuck does the TREND of the average slopes not make sense to
>this idiot. he claims the GW has stopped.
>I know that the CENTROID is the TREND of the motion of the record.
>
>josephus

It not only stopped, it may never have started,
the data has been cooked so bad it is scorched
and has lost integrity.

columbiaaccidentinvestigation

unread,

May 24, 2013, 8:48:31 AM5/24/13

to

On May 24, 5:43 am, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:" It not

only stopped, it may never have started, the data has been cooked so
bad it is scorched
and has lost integrity."

On Feb 3, 1:54 pm, emoneyjoe <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:"Because my
old eyes are burning and I have such a slow connection, I decline to
read your BS."
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/0d514a492f4cdf9c

Poor joey, you and your denialist friend have nothing left.

Dawlish

unread,

May 24, 2013, 9:36:05 AM5/24/13

to

Oh dear. GW hasn't happened for this nutbar.

Other nutbars: please don't tell us that no-one in the stupid seats says that GW hasn't happened, will you? Some of your compadres really do think this - though only half-brain and jimmy-cut-and-paste occupy lower IQ seats than this one. tundy sits happily next to joey.

emoneyjoe

unread,

May 24, 2013, 5:33:39 PM5/24/13

to

On Fri, 24 May 2013 06:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

All of you are GBs, or Gee Bees if you like,
that is better than calling you goofy bastards.

Dawlish

unread,

May 25, 2013, 3:00:39 AM5/25/13

to

See what I mean about the dregs?

Tunderbar

unread,

May 25, 2013, 10:29:28 AM5/25/13

to

I see what you mean every time you post.