Note: The following unrelated newsgroups were omitted in my reply:
news.software.readers
alt.comp.freeware
"Tony Palermo" wrote:
> Steve Bonine wrote:
>
>> I'm amused, but not surprised, at how much heat a $3.95
>> charge has generated.
>
> It 'is' interesting how each of us handles the charge:
> a) It's not free (is one attitude)
> b) Yes it is free, that 4 bucks is merely a nominal fee (is another)
> c) Even so, it's only 4 bucks (is yet another attitude)
>
> All these attitudes are valid.
>
> My "issue" is that you have to give up nothing but your IP address to
> post to some nntp servers (e.g., Aioe), while you have to also give up
> your email address for others (e.g., eternal september);
Tis the difference between using a free *unregistered* NNTP provider
versus a free *registered* NNTP provider. Anyone can and does post
through AIOE, including a higher count of trolls, miscreants, and
forgers. Policies, if defined, cannot be enforced since the abuser
isn't registered. They're new on every post. With a registered
service, the abuser can encounter the additional nuisance of having to
reestablish a new account when their old account gets disabled or
deleted provided policies are enforced and the NNTP provider actually
reacts to reports of abuse.
After deciding to flag posts originated from free unregistered NNTP
providers, I wanted to find out which others were known (versus the
registered providers). See all the noise generated by the topic at:
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.free.newsservers/browse_frm/thread/2bab876544b8ca7f/470a8a13e6ae98aa
If I had asked how to score/filter on one particular poster then I'd
probably get zero, one, or just a couple replies that were helpful.
When I asked how to score/filter on the type of NNTP provider, geez, a
bunch of users of unregistered providers got inflamed by their choice of
provider (they were afraid me, as just one netizen, wasn't going to see
their oh-so critical and life-changing posts) along with a ton of trolls
(most of whom I already filtered but decided to see all replies to this
thread in case they revealed an unregistered provider or used one as
identified by their headers). I pretty much expected a lot of noise
despite keeping neutral my request. Most respondents were more focused
on why (I wanted to score the sources) than on how (to score) or who (on
which to score).
> but for this
> particular teranews server, I suspect (but have not validated) that
> you must provide much more personal information to the operators
> just in order to give them their lousy 4 bucks. :)
Well, yeah, since you have to give them a valid credit card number
against which they can issue their signup fee. I haven't bothered to
read their terms or policies so I don't know how they handle abusers;
however, it won't take long for an abuser (spammer, troll, miscreant) to
stop re-paying the $4 signup fee after repeatedly getting their current
account killed.
> I wonder if they take cash in the snail mail?
I saw no means for such. I also found no means of using a PayPal
account to pay their signup fee. Credit card validation is also a means
of enforcing an age minimum. Because they have your credit card number
to associate with an account, illegal use of that account can be traced
to you. Plus they need your e-mail address to send to you what they
define as your login credentials.
You might be better off looking at Albasani or Eternal-September both of
which are registered providers. AIOE is doable, too, but I started
flagging posts from there awhile back due to it being an unregistered
provider that is well loved by spammers, trolls, miscreants, and
forgers. The quotas are a bit weird or more contrived at AIOE (it's
owner keeps playing with them and doesn't delineate all of them at his
web site) than expected from other NNTP providers.