Kent Bradley Wills, DOB Jan 8, 1969 World's Most Famous Convicted Garage Burglary Felon

[Greegor]

Kent has rotated through various types of denials,
some of which are not compatible with the others.
Kent used a few stooges and socks to help him
try to sell his false denials. The funniest part is
that Kent's APPEAL reflects the same kind of
idiocy that Kent tries on usenet.

http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

Screen Captures further proving the ID on Kent is correct.
http://immaculatecongestion.blogspot.com/

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.alien.visitors/msg/7bb21a6718c8504c

Sun, 15 Jun 2003 03:46:12 [...]
KBW 2003 > I was born in Krakow, Poland on
KBW 2003 > Jan. 8, 1969. I grew up there, and
KBW 2003 > in the mid 80's I came to the US.

http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html

Photo of Kent's shack at 1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas
72756-5520
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=1110+South+F+Street,+Rogers,+Arkansas+72756-5520
In the PHOTO (left side) look for the RED CHAIR on the front
"stoop"! LOL

http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&cb_client=maps_sv&thumb=2&thumbfov=30&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481

http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&cb_client=maps_sv&thumb=2&thumbfov=100&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481

http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=1&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481

http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/

Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click

Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection

Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >

Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969

A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on the SECOND Felony ending with 876.

Under the "Charges" tab:

Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:

[ These notes are still ONLINE and verifiable under CHARGES ]
[ Text compressed for presentation on usenet ]

Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:

Count 01
08/12/2003 Offense Date BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
12/17/2003 Adj.Date: GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence 10 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Count 02
08/12/2003 Offense BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR VEHICLE
(AGMS)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 2 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION Duration: 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE Duration: 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
Count 03
08/12/2003 USING JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE(FELC)709A.
6(2)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09

http://fifthdcs.com/addresses.cfm?location=fort

Fifth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services

Fort Des Moines Community Corrections Complex
Main Phone Number: (515) 242-6900

http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW


http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk
County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge.

Defendant appeals claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.

Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender,
and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State
Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin
Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P.
Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

WIGGINS, Justice.

Kent Wills appeals his conviction for
second-degree burglary contending that
an attached garage is a separate occupied
structure from that of the living quarters
of the residence. In this appeal, we must
determine whether trial counsel was
ineffective for (1) failing to move for
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to convict Wills
of second-degree burglary when he entered
an attached garage of a residence when no
persons were present in the garage, but
when persons were present in the living
quarters; and (2) failing to object to a
jury instruction based on this same
argument. Because we find there was no
legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury
instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not
ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called
the local police to report that a car
alarm sounded in the resident's
neighborhood. The city dispatched a police
officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only
to be stopped a couple of blocks later
by a person who informed the officer he
had witnessed someone running from the
area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the
car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the
person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody
running from the area. The minor answered
that he had not. While the officer and
another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood
arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people,
one of whom was heavy set with a blinking
light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She
observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's
attached garage through an unlocked service
door. She further observed a smaller
individual standing by a van parked in
the neighbor's driveway.

The officers eventually let the minor leave
even though they found a large amount of
coins, a flashlight, and an electronic
pocket organizer in his pockets. After
releasing the minor, the police officers
drove to the residence where the neighbor
observed the two suspicious people and
woke the owner. The owner, his wife,
and two daughters were in the residence
sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered
change and an electronic pocket organizer
were missing from the vehicles. The
owner's daughter reported a diamond ring
and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the
officers the minor was with Wills. After
the officers questioned the minor again,
he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the
burglary, the officers arrested him.

The State filed a trial information
charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the
information to include two additional
charges of burglary in the third degree
and using a juvenile to commit an
indictable offense.

The jury returned a verdict finding Wills
guilty of the crimes of burglary in the
second degree, burglary in the third
degree, and using a juvenile to commit
an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary
claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel.

II. Scope of Review.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the
United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.
Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93
(1984). Our review for a claim involving
violations of the Constitution is de novo.
State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
for postconviction relief actions. State
v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999).
However, we will address such claims on
direct appeal when the record is sufficient
to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer,
609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The
appellate record in the present case is
sufficient to allow us to address Wills'
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
on direct appeal.

In order for a defendant to succeed on a
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the defendant must prove: (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty and
(2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice
results when "there is a reasonable
probability that, but for the counsel's
unprofessional errors, the result of the
proceeding would have been different."
State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466
U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments
also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for
correction of errors at law. State v.
Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).

III. Analysis.

To find Wills guilty of burglary in the
second degree, the State had to prove
Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or
upon an occupied structure in which one
or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa
Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).

In this appeal, Wills first contends his
trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to move for a judgment of acquittal on
the basis there was insufficient evidence
to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons
present in or upon the occupied structure.
Wills concedes the garage was an occupied
structure, but argues the living quarters
and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore,
the jury could not have found there were
people present in the attached garage
at the time of the burglary.

The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:

[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances
to buildings and structures, land, water
or air vehicle, or similar place adapted
for overnight accommodation of persons,
or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity
therein, or for the storage or safekeeping
of anything of value. Such a structure
is an "occupied structure" whether or not
a person is actually present.

Id. § 702.12.

Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590
N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the
garage and the living quarters are separate
and independent occupied structures. In
Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors
were operated in the same structure.
590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant
committed two burglaries by entering each
business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up
demonstrate that the portions are
independent working units which constitute
'[a] combination of materials to form a
construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id.
Smothers is not at odds with the present
case because the living quarters and the
garage are not separate or independent
units of the residence.

Our review of the record reveals the garage
in question was a three-car attached garage
separated from the living quarters by a
door. The same roof covered the garage as
the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides.
It was structurally no different from any
other room in the residence.

The garage was a functional part of the
residence. On the night of the incident,
the door was unlocked. The owner of the
residence used two stalls in the garage to
park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As
such, the garage and the living quarters
are a single "structure" or "building"
functioning as an integral part of the
family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single
"occupied structure" under section 702.12.
See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr.
2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's
entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage
was attached to the house; therefore,
burglary of the garage was burglary of
an inhabited dwelling house); People v.
Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an
attached garage is a 'dwelling' because
it is part of the structure in which
the owner or occupant lives");
State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53
(N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary
of the [attached] garage was burglary of
the dwelling house because the garage was
a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d
760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding
"[s]ince the garage in the present case
was structurally part of a building
which was used for overnight lodging of
various persons, it must be considered
as part of a dwelling"); White v. State,
630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982)
(holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered
a habitation within the purview of the
penal code because the garage is a
structure appurtenant to and connected
to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.
2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993)
(holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute
included an attached garage).

Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to support
a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage there were no persons
present in or upon the occupied
structure, it would have been overruled
by the court because the owner and his
family were present in the residence at
the time of the burglary.

Wills also claims his counsel was
ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district
court on the same ground; that the
living quarters were a separate and
independent occupied structure from the
attached garage. The instruction as
given stated:

The State must prove all of the following
elements of Burglary in the Second
Degree as to Count I:

1. On or about the 12th day of August,
2003, the defendant or someone he aided
and abetted broke into or entered the
residence at . . . .

2. The residence at . . . was an occupied
structure as defined in Instruction No. 29.

3. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did not have permission or
authority to break into the residence at ...

4. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did so with the specific
intent to commit a theft therein.

5. During the incident persons were present
in or upon the occupied structure.

If the State has proved all of the elements,
the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not
guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and
you will then consider the charge of
Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree
explained in Instruction No. 21.

(Emphasis added.)

Wills' claim is without merit. As we have
discussed, the residence is the one and
only "occupied structure" under the facts
of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel
made this objection to the instruction,
it would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not
ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting
to the instruction because there was no
legal basis for the motion or objection.
See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234,
238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an
issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district
court because Wills' trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise
meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.


Kent and the BOAT registration
1. Kent posted links to photos of his boat.
2. Kent made public claims about his boat registration.
3. Kent lied about boat registration some more.
4. Kent posted link to a youtube video of his boat.
5. posted Oct 6 2007 purchase weeks before (Sep purchase)
6. The boat registration was plainly visible. IA 6312 WW
(1989 Bluefin)
7. Iowa boat registration revealed it was registered
to Dale and Judy Caquelin 105 Southfield Webster City, Iowa

[Greegor]

Hi

[Greegor]

Hi Kent!

[bit some rot]

On 5/18/2012 5:16 AM, Kent Wills wrote:
> Sadly, for you, I'm
> heterosexual,

With a pretend wife and son...lolololol.

[Greegor]

KBW > Sadly, for you, I'm heterosexual,

bsr > With a pretend wife and son...lolololol.

That's what they call a BEARD isn't it?

[Greegor]

Kent thinks I am his one and ONLY detractor.

[Greegor]

Are you still going to pretend that I am
your one and ONLY detractor, Kent? LOL

[Greegor]

> >>>Kent thinks I am his one and ONLY detractor.

> >>     What TRUTH about you did I expose in the post to which you
> >>replied that has you so SCARED you were COMPELLED to remove the
> >>totality of the post, then LIE?
> >>     Serious question, Greg.

G > Are you still going to pretend that I am
G > your one and ONLY detractor, Kent?  LOL

Kent?

[Greegor]

Hi

[Jazzy Belle]

On May 19, 7:09 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you still going to pretend that I am
> your one and ONLY detractor, Kent?  LOL

Moronic repetition noted
Lies in subject header noted.

Obsessive idiocy noted.

Spazzo spam postings noted.

Moe

[Checkmate]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what This account has been banned because it violated
the Google Groups Terms Of Use said:

> This is what Rock Hard Stupid Hanson does to little girls.
>
> http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808

I don't even wanna know.

--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved

[Checkmate]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Bit said:


>
> We interrupt this broadcast for important news from This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laug...@u.kook>:

> >This is what Rock Hard Stupid Hanson does to little girls.
> >
> >http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808
>
>
>

> And ask Greg Hanson what he was doing naked in the bathroom with an 8 year
> old girl?

He doesn't seem to want to answer that question for some reason.

[Greegor]

br > And ask Greg Hanson what he was doing
br > naked in the bathroom with an 8 year old girl?

Checky > He doesn't seem to want to
Checky > answer that question for some reason.

Wow. A question presuming a falsehood.
You seem tense, Checky!

[%]

LOL

[bit some rot]

On 5/21/2012 7:32 PM, Bit Rot wrote:
> We interrupt this broadcast for important news from This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use<laug...@u.kook>:
>> Jazzy Belle<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>

>> This is what Rock Hard Stupid Hanson does to little girls.
>>
>> http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808
>
>
>

> And ask Greg Hanson what he was doing naked in the bathroom with an 8 year
> old girl?
>
>
>
Ask Kunt Wills why he burgles garages.

[bit some rot]

On 5/21/2012 4:45 PM, Kent Wills wrote:
> It's because of his Asperger's.

Go sit in the red chair.

[bit some rot]

You sitting on Frank's lap again, dizzy?

[bit some rot]

On 5/22/2012 5:32 AM, Kent Wills wrote:
> Which of these women is Lisa Ren

The one sitting on your face, burgler.

[bit some rot]

On 5/22/2012 5:32 AM, Kent Wills wrote:

> And he only has so many changes of underwear.

Faked any boarding passes lately, Aruba-boi?

[Greegor]

> > And ask Greg Hanson what he was doing naked in the bathroom with an 8 year
> > old girl?

> Ask Kunt Wills why he burgles garages.

Kent actually did burglarize a garage.
I was never naked in the bathroom
with any 8 year old girl.

Kent was not POOR when he committed either of his
2 thieving felonies, or when he used a teen as
an accomplice to the garage burglary.

He's a trust fund brat.
It had to be more of a klepto kind of thing.

I wonder how much RENT Kent paid for that
apartment between the time his folks sold
the building out from under him and the
5 year mark after that when the new owner
sued Kent for unpaid rent?

Did they make a bargain when they sold
the building that Kent got 5 years of
free or reduced rent in his apartment?

05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT WILLS
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE 03/30/1999 Comments: UNPAID RENT

http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/protest/pickdpP.cgi?dp18100392048000=1&report=WebPublic

WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R.
sold to:
THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST
1994-04-26

Title: STATE VS KENT B WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR145250 (POLK)
Offense Date: 01/24/2000
Charge: 714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)

"theft by deception in the third degree"

[Fred Hall]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:11:57 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<2c787c0f-9a97-4926...@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:

> naked in the bathroom
>with any 8 year old girl.

Heh. She was 7

--

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/05/may-2012-nominations.html

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html

http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)

[Greegor]

> > naked in the bathroom
> > with any 8 year old girl.

""Fred Hall"" > Heh.  She was 7

I was never naked in the bathroom
with any 7 year old girl, Gary Lee.

Do you think anybody believed you
when you claimed you woke up with
your girlfriend's daughter on top
of your Johnson?

I was on a Social Services registry for
a few years, but you plea bargained to
a misd sex offense BUT with lifelong
listing on a CRIMINAL sex offender registry.
Moving to another state where they don't
place misdemeanor sex offenders on the
sex offender registry to weasel out
of your plea bargain deal is not
something to be proud of, Gary Lee.

[Fred Hall]

On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:47:42 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<83f01e09-de02-4091...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>:

>naked in the bathroom
>with any 7 year old gir

Liar

--

http://www.smbtech.com/ras/
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/03/ras-mikaere-eunuch-enoch-michael.html

[Greegor]

> >Kent actually did burglarize a garage.
>

>      You claimed I did not.
>      Where you lying then, or are you lying now.  You've NEVER
> answered this question.

I'm keeping you in suspense.

> >I was never naked in the bathroom
> >with any 8 year old girl.
>

>      She was six or seven years of age, and she was naked.

And behind a shower curtain, as would be
normal for a kid taking a shower in the
family bathroom.

> >Kent was not POOR when he committed either of his
> >2 thieving felonies, or when he used a teen as
> >an accomplice to the garage burglary.
>

>      Since I didn't commit the acts,

You posted your own Date Of Birth, Kent!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.alien.visitors/msg/7bb21a6718c8504c

Sun, 15 Jun 2003 03:46:12 [...]
KBW 2003 > I was born in Krakow, Poland on
KBW 2003 > Jan. 8, 1969. I grew up there, and
KBW 2003 > in the mid 80's I came to the US.

You posted your own claims about selling
a certain apartment building.

Property tax records for that building
clearly list your parents as the true
sellers and listed Sweeney as buyer.

5 years later, to the month, Sweeney
had to sue you for unpaid rent.

> something you've accidentally
> admitted, your claim is true.  Not in the deceptive way you are
> presenting it, but still true.
>      Thank you for more PROOF that you can only be honest,
> intentionally, if you think it will advance one or more of your MANY
> pathological lies.  Not that any additional proof was or is needed.

>
> >He's a trust fund brat.
>

>      You've yet to prove your LIE that I have a trust fund.
>      Quick, prove two people we don't know have a trust.  It's never
> proved your LIE about me to be the truth in the past, but maybe, just
> maybe, it will do so now.
>      Give it a shot, Greg.

>
> >It had to be more of a klepto kind of thing.
>
> >I wonder how much RENT Kent paid for that
> >apartment between the time his folks sold
> >the building out from under him and the
> >5 year mark after that when the new owner
> >sued Kent for unpaid rent?
>

> Projecting that Eagle Property Management had to sue you,
> multiple times,

Every one was a mistake BY THEM and was dropped.
Notice who paid for the erroneous filings.
It was not me.


> for unpaid rent, isn't getting you the win you
> DESPERATELY want.
>      You could claim Eagle's payment of a filing fee for the suit
> somehow proves you were in the right.  I can only guess people bought
> that LIE of yours before I exposed it for the LIE it was.

Please lay out your pretzel logic on this brainstorm, Kent.

> >Did they make a bargain when they sold
> >the building that Kent got 5 years of
> >free or reduced rent in his apartment?
>

>      You'd need to ask them. Since you can't seem to find them, you
> can only fixate on people who can't be my parents, you'll never be
> able to do so.
>      Post a screed about a University professor and a financial
> planner whom you KNOW are not my parents, Greg.  You have no other
> choice at this point.
>      Well, you could be honest and admit you've been LYING about my
> parents and me for all these years, but given how much ground you've
> lost since [...] kicked you out, I don't see you posting
> the truth.
>
> [Snip of items you've openly admitted are not about me]
>
>      Since you've openly admitted these items are about me, why do you
> post them as if they are?  Where you lying when you admitted they
> aren't, or are you lying now when you claim they are?
>      Both claims can't be true.  Which is the lie?

So your 1999 thieving felony was for theft by deception...
Golly, that sure DOES sound like you, Kent!

[bit some rot]

On 5/24/2012 12:25 PM, Kent Wills wrote:
> This is why you always have to play the avoidance game. At this
> point, everyone with an interest will KNOW that you've made both
> claims and never stated either was made in error. As such, everyone
> interested will know that any claim you make is likely to be a lie.

Butt Kunt, you really did burgle garages!

[bit some rot]

On 5/24/2012 3:19 AM, Kent Wills wrote:
>> Kent actually did burglarize a garage.

> You claimed I did not.

Online records say you did, Kunt.

[Jazzy Belle]

On May 24, 2:47 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > naked in the bathroom
> > > with any 8 year old girl.
>
> ""Fred Hall"" > Heh.  She was 7
>
> I was never naked in the bathroom
> with any 7 year old girl, Gary Lee.

Intended distortion noted. Intended LIE noted.
SHE was the one naked.

She also had her panties down when you claimed she " enjoyed" peeing
on herself and when you wiped the pee from between her legs with your
BARE hand.

Anyone familiar with the subjects of child abuse and child sexual
abuse knows that children do NOT "enjoy" peeing on themselves and that
it is a reaction to make themselves less "attractive" to the molester.

Moe
>

[Greegor]

Usenet misfit Moe making up nasty lies as usual.

So desperate to slam me for something bad
that she lies her ass off.

[Greegor]

On May 26, 1:50 pm, This account has been banned because it violated
the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laugh...@u.kook> wrote:

> Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On May 24, 2:47 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > naked in the bathroom
> >> > > with any 8 year old girl.
>
> >> ""Fred Hall"" > Heh.  She was 7
>
> >> I was never naked in the bathroom
> >> with any 7 year old girl, Gary Lee.
>
> >  Intended distortion noted. Intended LIE noted.
> >  SHE was the one naked.
>
> >  She also had her panties down when you claimed she " enjoyed" peeing
> > on herself and when you wiped the pee from between her legs with your
> > BARE hand.
>

> Ewww.

Whenever Moe runs out of angles
Maureen McAllister just makes up
nasty convenient lies.

> > Anyone familiar with the subjects of child abuse and child sexual
> > abuse knows that children do NOT "enjoy" peeing on themselves and that
> > it is a reaction to make themselves less "attractive" to the molester.

In the middle of the school day, Moe?
Go back to your TeeVee watching, psycho!

> The poor child must've wet herself from fear of Gregory Scott Hanson,
> convicted wife beater.

She only wet herself at school, nimrods.
Statistically your claims are BS of course.
Millions of kids have daytime wetting
problems that have nothing to do with abuse.

It's statistically not an indicator of abuse
even thought lots of idiots make that
false claim.

Only paranoid freaks like AUK'ers and
CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
wetting indicates abuse.

And even if some idiot believes that it
indicates abuse, the fact that it only
took place at school in the middle of
the day makes accusations even more stupid.


Gary Lee Burnore is a bonafide convicted CHILD MOLESTER

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg


GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages)Oct 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page3.JPG

"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.

Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.

The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,
suggests that risk for potential victims
may be high."

J. Puccinelli, Probation Officer, Unit IV
Municipal Court of the State of California,
Santa Clara County, People of the State
of California v. Gary Burnore
Probation Office No. DMU044
Court No. C9618225 DA No. 961131078
Santa Clara Police Department Case No. 9615185



SEVEN PAGE POLICE NARRATIVE

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page3.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page4.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page5.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page6.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page7.JPG

Police Narrative Pages 1-7
http://bayimg.com/haNigAaBd
http://bayimg.com/hanIIaaBd
http://bayimg.com/HaNIlAabd
http://bayimg.com/hAnimaaBD
http://bayimg.com/IANIaaAbD
http://bayimg.com/iaNicaabd
http://bayimg.com/iAnidaabd


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/410d9afbc1184818?hl=en&dmode=source

Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr2117984pbc.
0.1338033557517;
Sat, 26 May 2012 04:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: pr3ni50869pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!
postnews.google.com!b5g2000pbm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.support.child-
protective-services,misc.legal,alt.law-enforcement
Subject: Re: Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 wants more attention
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 04:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID:
<0ead6bd2-5cc3-4cba...@b5g2000pbm.googlegroups.com>
References: <8faeec68-9d52-4427-
accd-1f7...@to5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<05b81dd3-dd5d-4586...@l5g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
<483021a0-c976-4b1d...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
<d4b961eb35fd6274...@not-for-mail.invalid> <jpeqbj$tks
$1...@dont-email.me>
<jpgos8$sv9$4...@dont-email.me> <2c787c0f-9a97-4926-ba09-
c43846...@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<jpkl6e$jgt$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <83f01e09-de02-4091-
a8cc-a7d...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.227.25.206
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1338033557 31127 127.0.0.1 (26 May 2012
11:59:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: b5g2000pbm.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=75.227.25.206; posting-account=zW8kxwgAAABrCuDYTbWRR0mwD854eYAP
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/12.0,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May 24, 2:47=A0am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > naked in the bathroom
> > > with any 8 year old girl.
>

> ""Fred Hall"" > Heh. =A0She was 7

[Fred Hall]

On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<19a99af9-d8e7-4354...@j10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:

>CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
>wetting indicates abuse.

Yep, that's why Lisa's little girl was taken away.

[Greegor]

[Dan Sullivan]

"Fred Hall" <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:jprcjf$25d$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...

> On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <19a99af9-d8e7-4354...@j10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
>>CPS caseworkers believe that daytime
>>wetting indicates abuse.
>
> Yep, that's why Lisa's little girl was taken away.

greg hanson was an adult male unrelated to the little (7 yo) girl.

The primary reason Lisa's little girl was removed from greg's physical
custody was because in Feb of 2001 a neighbor reported that greg locked the
girl out of her own home with no coat, shoes or socks.

In the next few weeks greg admitted going into the bathroom whenever the
girl finished showering (supposedly so he could hand her a towel).

greg admitted physically handling the girl while she was naked.

greg admitted forcing the girl to take cold showers as punishment.

greg admitted spanking the girl.

greg proudly admitted driving the girl around town so she could pick bottles
and cans out of garbage cans for the deposit money.

[Greegor]

KBW > Subject: Re: Greg Hanson CONVICTED CHILD ABUSER

No, I have not been convicted of any such thing.

In 2003 Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8, 1969
caught a misdemeanor for using a teen as an
accomplice to his famous Garage Burglary Felony.
Kent has two felonies for thieving.

In 1997 Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957
caught a misdemeanor for Child Molestation
in California.

[Dan Sullivan]

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cc609fcf-443a-4577...@s5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...

> KBW > Subject: Re: Greg Hanson CONVICTED CHILD ABUSER
>
> No, I have not been convicted of any such thing.

greg hanson was convicted once by a jury and once by pleading guilty to
abusing his mentally ill wife.

This was before the Lisa Watkins' situation.

And greg hanson was also being investigated for child abuse and neglect at
that time.

[Greegor]

On May 26, 6:45 pm, "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Daniel J Sullivan III ( Now 64 years old ) of
6 S Pinelake Drive, Patchogue, NY 11772-2234
had 20+ investigations for child abuse and was
FOUNDED at least 5 times. One of his FOUNDED
reports was for CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE.

Feb 2002
"I was founded for SA of my daughter back in '93." - Dan Sullivan
[...]
'The "credible evidence" was my (3 yo) daughter's statement that "My
daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet." ' - Dan Sullivan
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/52b49e5611d619ea

April 2004 Dan Sullivan wrote
"My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d15f8e338226b780

July 2007 Dan Sullivan wrote
"My daddy touches me with the puppet bear in the toilet." - Dan
Sullivan
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.foster-parents/msg/2d04c26b08f9f2b9

[Greegor]

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

[Greegor]

GLB > It's clear that you accuse anyone who
GLB > finds out about you of doing what you do.

Sure, Gary, you're just an innocent guy
who woke up with his girfriend's kid
riding his prong. It's MY fault that
nobody believed your story and that you
got convicted of MOLESTING Rachael.

Similarly, I made the State of NY
investigate Dan Sullivan 20+ times
for child abuse and decide he was
FOUNDED for 5 of those, one for
Child Sexual Abuse! Years before
I ever heard of him even!

I MADE Dan post his "puppet bear"
story multiple times over the years.

I made Kent commit his thieving
felonies YEARS before I ever heard of him!
I MADE Kent brag about selling an entire
apartment building just so he could be
connected to his actual parents through
the online public tax records.
I MADE Kent post his DOB to usenet just
before his second and more famous felony.

And most of all I MADE you three morons
harass me repeatedly on usenet for
convictions and issues when each of you
three has a rather colorful history yourself.

[ Whining about LV snipped. ]

GLB > you're following me a round like a
GLB > puppy and I've said little abut you.

I don't quite see it that way, Gary Lee!

GLB > You REALLY think those other people are me?

Yes.

GLB > You're a fucking fool.

Sure I am, Gary Lee!

If you give me your attorney's name
address, phone number and bar card
number I'll be glad to give him my
address for serving court papers,
Gary Lee!

You might have a chance if you
hire Charles Novins!


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/e5b60c4297535d6e?hl=en&dmode=source

Received: by 10.68.241.7 with SMTP id we7mr3291332pbc.4.1338083198318;
Sat, 26 May 2012 18:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: pr3ni53065pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!
nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!
transit3.readnews.com!panix!panix.com!gburnore
From: Gary L Burnore <gburn...@databasix.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.support.child-
protective-services,misc.legal,alt.law-enforcement
Subject: Re: Daniel J Sullivan III investigated 20+ FOUNDED 5+ times
once for CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 01:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <jps11u$bbu$1...@reader1.panix.com>
References: <jpeqbj$tks$1...@dont-email.me> <jpgos8$sv9$4...@dont-email.me>
<2c787c0f-9a97-4926...@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<jpkl6e$jgt$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <83f01e09-de02-4091-a8cc-
a7dbe9...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
<0ead6bd2-5cc3-4cba...@b5g2000pbm.googlegroups.com>
<8b2389e0acb0f882...@not-for-mail.invalid> <19a99af9-
d8e7-4354-856...@j10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <jprcjf$25d
$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <4fc14650$0$3085$607e...@cv.net>
<cc609fcf-443a-4577...@s5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
<4fc16b2f$0$10921$607e...@cv.net> <13c74a1f-e8b8-400b-b168-
b0f5bb...@3g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1338083198 11646 166.84.1.2 (27 May 2012
01:46:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ab...@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 01:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Jamie-is-an-asshole: youbetcha
X-Jamie-Baillie-Web: thetruthaboutjamie.blogspot.com
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/5.1.2
(i386))

[Greegor]

G > In the middle of the school day, Moe?

G > Go back to your TeeVee watching, psycho!

KBW > Wait.
KBW > You claimed she was outside paying
KBW > with friends when it happened.

No I didn't. You're making up BS again.

KBW >  Now she was at school?

Every time.


KBW > You need to pick a lie, and stick with it.

The major LIE is your presentation that
my story has changed when it has not.

You played this BS "brain fart" game
( lies ) more and I'm not interested.



Gary Lee Burnore's NC Corrections listing!

http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE

[Greegor]

Official North Carolina Department Of Corrections web site

http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=4469+Still+Pines+Drive,+Raleigh,+NC+27613-3334

[bit some rot]

On 5/27/2012 1:53 PM, Kent Wills wrote:
> Your tacit admission, by YOUR standards, that were lying is
> accepted.

Say howdy to imaginary "Lin".

[Jazzy Belle]

On May 26, 12:44 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 26, 6:59 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 24, 2:47 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > naked in the bathroom
> > > > > with any 8 year old girl.
>
> > > ""Fred Hall"" > Heh.  She was 7
>
> > > I was never naked in the bathroom
> > > with any 7 year old girl, Gary Lee.
>
> >  Intended distortion noted. Intended LIE noted.
> >  SHE was the one naked.
>
> >  She also had her panties down when you claimed she " enjoyed" peeing
> > on herself and when you wiped the pee from between her legs with your
> > BARE hand.
>

> >  Anyone familiar with the subjects of child abuse and child sexual
> > abuse knows that children do NOT "enjoy" peeing on themselves and that
> > it is a reaction to make themselves less "attractive" to the molester.
>

> Usenet misfit Moe making up nasty lies as usual.

Projection AND irony noted.

>
> So desperate to slam me for something bad
> that she lies her ass off.

Projection noted. Lies noted.

Hanson, you know that one of my many interests is true crime. Guess
what, dipbrain? Child abuse and the behavior of child molesters and
abusers ARE areas of true crime.

You admitted you were charged with abusing your ex-wife
You yourself described how you looked at and treated Lisa's then seven
year old daughter in ways that no normal adult would ever do, but YOU
did. The "training her like you do with cats" claim and the FACT that
you still try to cover up your "wiping the pee with your bare hand"
story and your obvious pervo watching her naked in the bathroom come
from what YOU posted, pervert.

Your subsequent selfishness after she was taken away from the home,
your obvious not caring if Lisa ever regained custody of her daughter
and your arrogance in wanting the courts to pay for the storage fees
of your hoarded junk that made Lisa's home unsafe for the child are
some of MANY examples of what you are, gaggie.

No normal, sane adult man would have considered what you admitted you
did as appropriate.

Greg, you are a sick, pathetic male.

Moe

[Greegor]

Moe > Hanson, you know that one of my
Moe > many interests is true crime.

But NOT when it comes to the Burglary felon Kent
or the convicted CHILD MOLESTER Gary Lee Burnore?

Gary's confession to Police was about
kissing the kid but later he came up
with a story that he woke up with the
teen on top of his shaft.

Why haven't you expressed an opinion
on THAT story, Maureen?

Kent says the scanned records were faked.

But how do you suppose he explains the
NC Corrections listing that's online?




Gary Lee's Official ONLINE NC Department Of Corrections web page

[Greegor]

Moe > Hanson, you know that one of my
Moe > many interests is true crime.

G > But NOT when it comes to the Burglary felon Kent
G > or the convicted CHILD MOLESTER Gary Lee Burnore?

KBW > You've openly admitted I committed no such crime,

Does repeating that lie over and over comfort you, Kent?

KBW > and you had to LIE about Gary, claiming he
KBW > plead guilty to a felony when he was
KBW > charged with a misdemeanor.

Where did I claim that Gary was charged with a felony?
Oh wait, you're Kent Wills, famous usenet liar.

[Greegor]

Why did you claim that this young man is a girl, Kent?

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973

Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985

[bit some rot]

On 5/30/2012 7:00 PM, Kent Wills wrote:
> And I've never claimed the man you reference is female.
>

Flail Kunt, flail.

[Greegor]

KBW > And I've never claimed the man you reference is female.

bsr > Flail Kunt, flail.

----------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/6a551084250011f0?hl=en
Will you stalk everyone with his name, the same as you're doing
with that gal from Facebook, Sean Bilyeu?
------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/c92a908b7f8bde1f?hl=en
Aug 2010 Greg posted Bilyeu's Facebook link, still active.
------------------------------

Why did Kent even bother with this really lame deception?
Why's gender of Kent's teen accomplice a sensitive subject?

Was their relationship more than criminal partners?

[Greegor]

> >Why did you claim that this young man is a girl, Kent?

>      Since you removed my answer in your reply, once again I'll state,

> I've never claimed the man you reference is female.

Yet another Kent Wills blatant lie.

It must have been a touchy subject.

[Greegor]

G > Why did you claim that this young man is a girl, Kent?

KBW > Since you removed my answer in your reply, once again I'll
state,
KBW > I've never claimed the man you reference is female.

G > Yet another Kent Wills blatant lie.
G > It must have been a touchy subject.

Why did you even BOTHER to try the
deception that Bilyeu was/is female, Kent?

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973

Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985

After you were ridiculed for the deception that
your accomplice Bilyeu was/is female, you
switched to claiming that you never made such a claim.

YOU raised the issue of your accomplice's gender.
What possible difference would their gender make, Kent?

Was your relationship with Bilyeu more than criminal mentor/mentee?

[Greegor]

Gary's confession to Police was about
kissing the kid but later he came up
with a story that he woke up with the

teen riding on top of his middle leg.

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages) Oct 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page3.JPG

"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.

Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.

The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,
suggests that risk for potential victims
may be high."

J. Puccinelli, Probation Officer, Unit IV
Municipal Court of the State of California,
Santa Clara County, People of the State
of California v. Gary Burnore
Probation Office No. DMU044
Court No. C9618225 DA No. 961131078
Santa Clara Police Department Case No. 9615185