Bush is secretly making plans to reinstate the draft if he gets
another term!
Going by this MSNBC(owned by the military/industrial complex) article;
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6134043/
it's obvious the evil, psychotic, sociopathic NeoCons running the
Pentagon are putting out DISINFO to try and cover up the fact that
they want to reinstate the draft and force 18-25 year olds to fight
and die in their phony pre-emptive wars for oil and power!!
For all of you 18-25 year olds out there;
If you want to DIE; VOTE BUSH
If you want to LIVE; VOTE KERRY!!
HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
"HELL NO, WE WON'T GO" <hell_no_we...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8efaaf39.04092...@posting.google.com...
The Neo-Con mantra.
Jack
bobo1148atxmissiondotcom
> In article <8efaaf39.04092...@posting.google.com>,
> hell_no_we...@yahoo.com (HELL NO, WE WON'T GO) wrote:
>
> > HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
> > HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
> > HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
> >
> > Bush is secretly making plans to reinstate the draft if he gets
> > another term!
>
> He's planning to resume beer at the White House? Speak for yourself on
> not wanting to go, d00d.
oh great
an untreated alcoholic with unlimited beer
arf meow arf
> In article <8efaaf39.04092...@posting.google.com>,
> hell_no_we...@yahoo.com (HELL NO, WE WON'T GO) wrote:
>> HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
>> HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
>> HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
>>
>> Bush is secretly making plans to reinstate the draft if he gets
>> another term!
> He's planning to resume beer at the White House?
Bush is copying COO again, the poor li'l wannabe.
PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
"pjr is exceptionally evil." - yyyiiinnnggg
[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]
Is there nothing the Dems won't claim to get their power back? How
about, vote for Bush and Florida will be hit with 4 more hurricanes?
Donna Long
<J...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<u7SdnYKocZr...@adelphia.com>...
No he's not. There are bills in Congress to reinstitute the draft, but those
bills were sponsored by Democrats and won't get anywhere.
Rather than trying to frighten people by generating fraudulent stories,
shouldn't the Kerry campaign give people a reason to vote for him? Chanting
"ABB" may help the kooks feel better, but it doesn't impress regular folks
out there who would like to see a viable alternative.
Toooo fucking cold at the poles. North Pole AND South Pole are ice covered
even at the height of summer. If I was a black, brown, red, blue, green, or
even polka dot voter nobody could tell what color I was if a polling place
was opened at either of the poles and I dressed appropriately for the
weather.
--
Don Thompson
How is it that modern liberals can disregard 5,000 years of military
experience in favor of the slogans, some formed facetiously, of the "peace"
movement of the 1960's?
http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/
~~~~~~~~
ralph nader
ross perot
lassie
warren rudman
custard dripping from a dead dogs eye
arf meow arf
5000? pfft
thats three percent or less of span of h sapiens so far
hardly a stable platform for extrapolation
arf meow arf
>"HELL NO, WE WON'T GO" <hell_no_we...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:8efaaf39.04092...@posting.google.com...
>> HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
>> HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
>> HELL NO WE WON'T GO!!!
>>
>> Bush is secretly making plans to reinstate the draft if he gets
>> another term!
>No he's not. There are bills in Congress to reinstitute the draft, but
>those bills were sponsored by Democrats and won't get anywhere.
The bills make the draft -- if its started again by bush -- fair.
bush claims he can have a draft without Congress.
The lies and misinformtion is coming from you characters on the right.
Too late; Georgie-borgie has already done that with his Patriot Act.
I'll tell you this; the Real Patriots will Act this November and put that
little punk and his New World Order (instituted by his daddy) into the
unemployment line and onto the trash heap of history.
-- John
The history of things that didn't happen has never been written.
. - -
- Henry Kissinger
I'm jealous of him.
--
Should I have a lobotomy? Vote at
http://www.bestandworst.com/pages/vote/vote-51909.html
The only problem with this is that Kerry is as beholden to Uncle Ariel as the
Bushkult is...
http://www.forward.com/main/article.php?ref=kessler20040923145
CAMPAIGN CONFIDENTIAL
September 24, 2004
By E.J. Kessler
Oh Brother: Cameron Kerry is pledging his brother John would review the sentence
of convicted spy Jonathan Pollard, who received a life sentence in 1985 after
pleading guilty of passing classified documents to Israel.
"It does seem like [Pollard] got a disparate sentence. I'm sure a President
Kerry will take a look at it," the younger Kerry said at a lunch with reporters
from Jewish newspapers Wednesday in Manhattan. "I can guarantee you that if he
looks at it he'll spend longer than George Bush did looking at the death penalty
clemency case in the state of Texas," he added, taking a swipe at the president,
who notoriously spent only minutes reviewing each case when he was governor.
The remarks seemed pitched to curry favor with Orthodox Jews. Bush has rebuffed
numerous calls to free Pollard, who has many defenders among Orthodox Jewry.
A convert to Judaism, Cameron Kerry was back in town for another meeting with
Orthodox Jewish communal leaders and others after an awkward meeting with some
of the same folks August 26. Then, he got off on the wrong foot by criticizing
Attorney General John Ashcroft for, among other things, starting his day with a
prayer. That antagonized the Orthodox leaders, who start their day the same way.
The Wednesday meeting, brokered by New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver,
went much better.
A relaxed Kerry, chatting in a Lower East Side kosher restaurant over pastrami
on rye, said the assembled communal officials had asked him to discuss his
brother's commitment to Israel's security, "the mess in Iraq" and domestic
issues such a healthcare and the budget deficit. He said he had brought up his
brother's commitment to religious freedoms 訏 John Kerry is co-author of a
Senate bill of the Workplace Religious Freedom Act with Senator Rick Santorum, a
Pennsylvania Republican and his brother's plan for energy independence, which
the candidate casts as a national security as well economic and environmental
issue.
Cameron Kerry also took the occasion to rap Bush for neglecting the issue of
Iran's aspirations for a nuclear weapon.
"President Bush gave a speech [at the United Nations] just yesterday and there
was no mention of Iran," he said. "Here is the greatest threat to the security
of Israel, the security of the U.S. and the world and he had an opportunity to
make a statement with the world community that this is an important priority and
an important threat. We heard nothing. We need to press forward with making Iran
accountable for its nuclear development and make sure it's a peaceful use."
Cameron Kerry rebutted Senator John Kyl's contention that John Kerry's plan to
engage with Iran over its nuclear program amounted to the kind of deal President
Clinton and Secretary of State Albright did with North Korea on its own nuclear
program, which the North Koreans flouted.
"That's absolutely wrong," he said. "Bush has gone full circle from walking away
from North Korea while the North Korean threat got worse, until we woke up and
started engaging. North Korea is a great example of how we can't ignore the
threat. We've got to deal with it."
On a more gossipy note, Kerry said his brother's favorite Jewish food was
"probably lox." Sounds fishy to us.
Communal officials at the meeting include the head of the Jewish Communal
Relations Council of New York, Michael Miller; three officials of the Orthodox
Union, Matthew Maryles, Rabbi Menachem Genack and Betty Ehrenberg; the general
counsel of Agudath Israel of America, David Zwiebel, and the chief of Ohel
Children's Home, David Mandel.
***
PLONK!!
"HELL NO, WE WON'T GO" <hell_no_we...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8efaaf39.04092...@posting.google.com...
"HELL NO, WE WON'T GO" <hell_no_we...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8efaaf39.04092...@posting.google.com...
by the way I think the man's name is Rachelle who wrote the draft bill
"mellstrr" <mell...@nospam.netcom> wrote in message
news:opse5v34sioosrn7@mellster...
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:05:03 GMT, Buck <Bu...@Buckarooville.CowTown.Net>
> wrote:
>
>> Go fuck yourself!
>>
>> PLONK!!
>
> Oooh, you told him.
>
> You must not have any children. Either that, or you're so priveliged (or
> so OLD) that your kids won't have to serve in this unjust war.
>
> If you think it's such a just war, be sure to have someone take a picture
> of you while you're standing on the 'front line' somewhere. Stand
> somewhere near Falluja, and smile pretty for the camera, so we can all see
> your handsome face just once more before you head off to catch some
> shrapnel with it.
>
> Can I hear ya say "Bring 'em ON!"??
>
> Beside, you do realize that John Kerry hasn't pledged to end this madness,
> either.
>
> I'm trying to imagine the subject of a "military draft", perceived or
> otherwise, coming up tonight during what's been repeatedly billed as a
> "presidential debate" (stifling laughter). I'm trying to imagine it
> reeeeeeeeally hard. Because I would bet that Tweedle-Dumber and his
> lurching opponent won't go anywhere near it while there's a live mic in
> front of them.
>
> Then again, it would be pointless to "debate" the subject if they both
> agreed on it. Which, if it doesn't come up, would likely be a good
> indicator that they do agree on it, thus there's nothing for _them_ to
> debate.
>
> mellstrr--and to hell with the rest of US
only makes sense if you think al qaeda is the same thing
as iraq or syria or dprk
the real terrorists are not cheneys bogeymen
in the battlefield they are few and weak
wha you need is well trained and well motivated
which is not what youre ging to get from conscripts
together with international cooperation
which shrub has squandered
and bright and determined detectives
arf meow arf
HELL NO, WE WON'T GO <hell_no_we...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8efaaf39.04092...@posting.google.com...
>Just goes to show how misled you are.
>It is the democrats who authored the bill to brinig back the draft.
No it does not bring the draft back -- it make a draft bush wants to have
-- more fair.
> Now if you put a side this Bush/Kerry Crap....
This "crap", believe it or not, is rather important. There's simply no
putting that aside, unless one lives in a vacuum.
> We do need to have the draft
> back.
Do tell us why.
> Yes I have a 14 year old son I do realize what I am saying....
Have you asked him how he felt about this?
> The only way
> to fight a continued war against these
> terrorist bastards is to have an army that will not run out of troops.
Ah, but how do you know who the "terrorist bastards" really are?
Have you heard that there may have been lies used to start this war?
Would you think differently about this "war" if that were true? Would you
feel differently if your son died for no other reason than to line the
pockets of a bunch of greedy old men who don't give a damn anymore about
your country or your Constitution?
Please. Look and think outside the FOX.
mellstrr
>> Go fuck yourself!
>> PLONK!!
Oooh, you told him.
You must not have any children. Either that, or you're so priveliged (or
Cai deo gi day??
May an long dai cham mui!
pardon mais je ne comprends pas le francais
arf meow arf
>In article <kc17d.4289$OX.3748@trndny07>, <leto...@nospam.net> wrote:
>>In <0s07d.12226$Qv5....@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>, on 09/30/2004 >
>at 11:15 PM, "Director of Armed Response" <rj...@juno.com> said: >
>>>Just goes to show how misled you are.
>>>It is the democrats who authored the bill to brinig back the draft.
>>
>>No it does not bring the draft back -- it make a draft bush wants to have
>>-- more fair.
>>
>Spin spin spin.
No -- its the truth you ashsole Now stop lying.
>Reality: Democrats introduced the draft bills. Bush has not asked
>congress for it, and has repeatedly denied any interest in enacting a
>draft.
He has claimed the authority to initiate a draft. Deal with reality.
>DEMOCRATS want the draft, not Republicans.
you mean -- not until after the election.
>-Geoff
>said:
>
>>In article <kc17d.4289$OX.3748@trndny07>, <leto...@nospam.net> wrote:
>>>In <0s07d.12226$Qv5....@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>, on 09/30/2004 >
>>at 11:15 PM, "Director of Armed Response" <rj...@juno.com> said: >
>>>>Just goes to show how misled you are.
>>>>It is the democrats who authored the bill to brinig back the draft.
>>>
>>>No it does not bring the draft back -- it make a draft bush wants to have
>>>-- more fair.
>>>
>
>>Spin spin spin.
>>Reality: Democrats introduced the draft bills. Bush has not asked
>>congress for it, and has repeatedly denied any interest in enacting a
>>draft.
>
>He has claimed the authority to initiate a draft. Deal with reality.
>
>
>>DEMOCRATS want the draft, not Republicans.
>
>you mean -- not until after the election.
Does it really matter who introduced it? Of course not. Stay on-point,
cash-clown.
Neither of the "anointed candidates" will touch this subject, because it will be
political suicide.
Plus, they both agree on it anyway. No point in "debating" a subject when you're
both on the SAME SIDE.
You know damned well that there's a draft pending. It does not matter who
"introduced the bill".
mellstrr
> Did you listen to the debate???
> Bush said all volunteer army.........
> missed that didn't you?
he also said iraq and nuclear weapons
and the usa was under imminent threat of attack
and iraq was part of 9-11
would you buy a used war from this man?
arf meow arf
Bush said Iraq was an eminent threat. Which Bush are we to believe?
--
Jack
bobo1148atxmissiondotcom
--
Don Thompson
How is it that modern liberals can disregard 5,000 years of military
experience in favor of the slogans, some formed facetiously, of the "peace"
movement of the 1960's?
http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/
~~~~~~~~
"nJb" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cjpk2p$jp5$1...@news.xmission.com...
My money is on the 15th. of October.
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
I'll accept that, although I doubt you could prove he "never" said it.
Ever. The correct response would have been to challenge me to prove he
did say it, which I couldn't.
> Don T wrote:
> > No. Bush never said Iraq was an imminent threat. Ever.
> >
>
>
> I'll accept that, although I doubt you could prove he "never" said it.
> Ever. The correct response would have been to challenge me to prove he
> did say it, which I couldn't.
its a pretty silly thing to argue over anyway
if its not even an imminent threat
then what the hell justification is there to destroy it?
arf meow arf
Money for campaign donors? An old grudge? He tried to kill my daddy? All
of the above?
He said something about a 'pubic bush ' too ?
>
> Do you think Bush will find Osama bin Laden before the election?
> I wonder where Osama is?
It no longer qualifies as a surprise.
--
http://BeDoper.com - BeOS and a hell of a lot more
Gortician's Not Dead, Punk
http://www.metal-archives.com/release.php?id=15537
Gortician - "Purple Haze" cover
http://www.audiostreet.net/artists/000/640/gortician.html
> Yik Yak <jim...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:76t1m0pdncv51rere...@4ax.com:
>
> >
> > Do you think Bush will find Osama bin Laden before the election?
> > I wonder where Osama is?
>
> It no longer qualifies as a surprise.
where in the world is carmen sanladen
arf meow arf
>
> Do you think Bush will find Osama bin Laden before the election?
> I wonder where Osama is?
It's a lose-lose-lose situation. The first time that the adminitration
would actually be humiliated if Bin Laden was caught, because of
conspiracy fallout.
Here are the logical options for October (by "caught" I mean captured or
killed):
1. Bin Laden is not caught (most likely).
2. Bin Laden is caught, news of his captured delayed for political
advantage.
3. Bin Laden is caught, immediate news of his capture sent around the
globe.
Which of these is the best thing in terms of overall justice?
Which of these is the best thing for the Bush Administration?
Conspiracy theories are the byproduct of free speech - and it's ok as
long as one speculates on past events. But speculate on conspiracy of
events yet to happen? Unless there's reason to believe otherwise (i.e.
if the administration planned a surprise for last election), that is.
-David
Or Waldo, for that matter.