TIMMY, WHERE'S THE PROOF THAT OSWALD WOUNDED WALKER ?
Gil Jesus
"He missed with his first shot when it hit the window frame and
deflected. He went very close to killing Walker. He certainly wounded
him."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ce25b4f9d8260014
WE'RE STILL WAITING FOR THE PROOF OF THE WOUNDING.
tims...@gmail.com
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh11/html/WC_Vol11_0210b.htm
There ya go Gilly! Looks like you are pretending that you didn't see
it on the other thread, eh Gilly?
If you're any sort of a researcher you should be able to work out that
Walker says he was hit by slivers of metal from Oswald's bullet.
His arm was bleeding in three places, according to his PBS interview.
I expect you'll simply run from this response, as usual, Gilly, LOL!
Amused Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
muc...@gmail.com
> On Nov 17, 10:36 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Timmy Brennan, "Newsgroups Commentator" wrote :
>
> > "He missed with his first shot when it hit the window frame and
> > deflected. He went very close to killing Walker. He certainly wounded
> > him."
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ce25b4f9d8260014
>
> > WE'RE STILL WAITING FOR THE PROOF OF THE WOUNDING.
>
>
> There ya go Gilly! Looks like you are pretending that you didn't see
> it on the other thread, eh Gilly?
>
> If you're any sort of a researcher you should be able to work out that
> Walker says he was hit by slivers of metal from Oswald's bullet.
>
> His arm was bleeding in three places, according to his PBS interview.
>
> I expect you'll simply run from this response, as usual, Gilly, LOL!
>
> Amused Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Perhaps Gil was expecting a YouTube video.
Gil Jesus
> There ya go Gilly! Looks like you are pretending that you didn't see
> it on the other thread, eh Gilly?
>
> If you're any sort of a researcher you should be able to work out that
> Walker says he was hit by slivers of metal from Oswald's bullet.
>
> His arm was bleeding in three places, according to his PBS interview.
>
> I expect you'll simply run from this response, as usual, Gilly, LOL!
Timmy, any police reports, medical reports, anything other than just
Walker's "word" ?
I'm looking for documentation from more than one source that would
corroborate his story, Timmy.
Keep looking.
Gil Jesus
>
> Perhaps Gil was expecting a YouTube video.-
No, just EVIDENCE.
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Mark,
LOL! What a baby Gilly is. Walker gives sworn testimony to the WC that
he was injured; he gives a later TV interview saying the same thing
but Gil doesn't like it, demanding further proof.
Hey, Gil, when people like your mate, Lee Harvey Oswald, go around
shooting at people with high powered rifles, people tend to get hurt,
y'know? People like James T. Tague and John Connally. Got one tiny
skerrick of proof Walker was lying, Gil? I didn't think so...
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Walt
> TOP POST
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> LOL! What a baby Gilly is. Walker gives sworn testimony to the WC that
> he was injured; he gives a later TV interview saying the same thing
> but Gil doesn't like it, demanding further proof.
>
> Hey, Gil, when people like your mate, Lee Harvey Oswald, go around
> shooting at people with high powered rifles, people tend to get hurt,
> y'know? People like James T. Tague and John Connally. Got one tiny
> skerrick of proof Walker was lying, Gil? I didn't think so...
Since your a sucker for Walker's word.... and you want proof that he
was a liar, why don't you read his entire testimony and pay particular
attention to his testimony regarding his telephone conversation with
the German newsman, in Munich. Even the WC attorney knew he was
lying, and became disgusted with his limpid lies, but the Warren
Commission's mission was to "convince the public that Oswald was the
assassin" (JEH) and Walker was there to help frame Oswald.....So Belin
actually helped him construct lies.
Read Walker's testimony Timmy...... Even you should be smart enough to
spot the transparent fabrications.
>
> Concerned Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> On Nov 17, 11:18 pm, much...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 17 Nov., 13:09, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 17, 10:36 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Timmy Brennan, "Newsgroups Commentator" wrote :
>
> > > > "He missed with his first shot when it hit the window frame and
> > > > deflected. He went very close to killing Walker. He certainly wounded
> > > > him."
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ce25b4f9d8260014
>
> > > > WE'RE STILL WAITING FOR THE PROOF OF THE WOUNDING.
>
> > >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh11/html/WC_Vol...
>
> > > There ya go Gilly! Looks like you are pretending that you didn't see
> > > it on the other thread, eh Gilly?
>
> > > If you're any sort of a researcher you should be able to work out that
> > > Walker says he was hit by slivers of metal from Oswald's bullet.
>
> > > His arm was bleeding in three places, according to his PBS interview.
>
> > > I expect you'll simply run from this response, as usual, Gilly, LOL!
>
> > > Amused Regards,
>
> > > Tim Brennan
> > > Sydney, Australia
> > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> > Perhaps Gil was expecting a YouTube video.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Bud
At least you admit there is a difference.
Gil Jesus
Gil Jesus
Got one tiny
> skerrick of proof Walker was lying, Gil? I didn't think so...
Timmy:
Was Walker taken into custody and placed in a mental institution for
observation following the riots at Ole Miss ?
Yes or No.
tims...@gmail.com
That is simply your interpretation Walt.
You adopt marginalised position after position based on your
frequently absurd speculations.
The evidence/testimony in the 26 volumes didn't agree with your
position on whether Walker was wounded Walt, so you simply rejected
it.
The WC counsel never questioned Walker's assertion that he was wounded
Walt.
Why would any rational person accept the interpretation of someone
(you) who believes that Oswald was an anti-Castro agent who JFK
personally knew of and JFK was <snicker> really keen to get to
infiltrate Castro's Cuba.
That idea is completely harebrained Walt, just like your gibberish
about only CE133A being genuine. There is eveidence to say Walker was
wounded. You've produced nothing to say he wasn't.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tims...@gmail.com
LOL! Looks like Gil now rejects evidence/testimony in the 26 volumes
if it doesn't agree with one of his pet theories or, more likely, that
he wasn't even aware of in the first place. Let's hope tomnln doesn't
learn of this. There will be merry Hell to pay!
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Walt
> TOP POST
>
> That is simply your interpretation Walt.
>
> You adopt marginalised position after position based on your
> frequently absurd speculations.
>
> The evidence/testimony in the 26 volumes didn't agree with your
> position on whether Walker was wounded Walt, so you simply rejected
> it.
>
> The WC counsel never questioned Walker's assertion that he was wounded
> Walt.
>
> Why would any rational person accept the interpretation of someone
> (you) who believes that Oswald was an anti-Castro agent who JFK
> personally knew of and JFK was <snicker> really keen to get to
> infiltrate Castro's Cuba.
>
> That idea is completely harebrained Walt, just like your gibberish
Why would any rational person accept the interpretation of someone
(you) who believes that Oswald was an anti-Castro agent who JFK
personally knew of and JFK was <snicker> really keen to get to
infiltrate Castro's Cuba.
That idea is completely harebrained Walt,
Oh I completely agree.... The idea is harebrained..... But so was his
idea to hi-jack an airliner to cuba. You're not very well versred on
the assassination so you may not be aware that Oswald told Marina that
he was thinking about hi-jacking an airliner and forcing the pilot to
fly to Cuba.
Oswald was looking for a way to get into Cuba without sneaking
in...... He was looking for a way that would make him appear to be a
disgrintled American and a supporter of Castro's revolution.
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Ms.Burb
I just hate to butt in here and interupt your colorful debate but
wasn't there a DPD police report filled out the night of the shooting
of Walker? And since his aid arrived shortly after the shooting,
wouldn't he have had to fill out a witness statement and/or the cop on
scene, for that matter, fill out a statement that Walker was knicked
by a bullet fragment? Wouldn't a DPD report be the coroborating
evidence for which you are looking?
Lemme know, thx! Ms. Burb
robcap...@netscape.com
This is interesting SPECULATION, but do you have any proof beyond
Marina's word for it that LHO was going "to hijack an airliner to
Cuba?" I'll wait for the proof or for you to say it is just your
belief this was going to happen but you CAN'T prove it.
> Oswald was looking for a way to get into Cuba without sneaking
> in...... He was looking for a way that would make him appear to be a
> disgrintled American and a supporter of Castro's revolution.
Proof please or admit this is your speculation.
Walt
wrote:
Rob, You're just gonna haffta get yer head outta yer ass.....
Haven't you ever seen a signed affidavit, with nortary seal, that
Oswald wrote that he was planning to hi-jack an airliner and forcing
the pilot to fly him to Cuba??
>
> > Oswald was looking for a way to get into Cuba without sneaking
> > in...... He was looking for a way that would make him appear to be a
> > disgrintled American and a supporter of Castro's revolution.
>
> Proof please or admit this is your speculation.- Hide quoted text -
robcap...@netscape.com
No I haven't, can you please put a link to it? I realize the ruse of
his trip to Mexico City (which there is NO real evidence for, and keep
in mind, ALL the evidence put forth by the WC came from the CIA who
were involved in JFK's murder in the first place) was for him to be
getting a visa to Cuba, but that whole trip was made up by the CIA.
The one who was running guns and other things to Cuba for Lansky was
Ruby, NOT LHO.
Walt
I'm sorry, you're just going to have to find it for yourself........
I realize the ruse of his trip to Mexico City (which there is NO real
evidence for, and keep in mind, ALL the evidence put forth by the WC
came from the CIA who were involved in JFK's murder in the first
place) was for him to be
getting a visa to Cuba, but that whole trip was made up by the CIA.
Since there was no Cuban embassy in the U.S. Oswald went to Mexico
City to try to get a visa. Apparently he was under the impression
that he would have no trouble obtaining a visa at the Cuban Embassy in
Mexico City.
Where did Oswald get the idea that he could get that visa?? Someone
in New orleans who Oswald believed was one of Castro's agents must
have told him that he would set it up for Oswald, and all he'd have to
do was go there and pick up his visa. But either the Cuban that
Oswald thought was one of Castro's agent was not what Oswald thought
he was ....or the Cuban Ambassador was fooled by Oswald's phoney
portfolio.
> The one who was running guns and other things to Cuba for Lansky was
> Ruby, NOT LHO.- Hide quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hey Gilly,
Didn't the report of the DPD say that Walker was injured in the
shooting? Of course it did Gilly and you know it. That must be why the
WC didn't question Walker's assertion in his testimony that he was
injured, Gilly.
Did you ever think of that, Gilly?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
robcap...@netscape.com
That is what I thought. Walt, this is a board for sharing, and if you
CAN'T produce evidence to back up your claims than I will just chalk
it up to another claim you can't support. It is your belief, NOT fact
you are talking about.
> I realize the ruse of his trip to Mexico City (which there is NO real
> evidence for, and keep in mind, ALL the evidence put forth by the WC
> came from the CIA who were involved in JFK's murder in the first
> place) was for him to be
> getting a visa to Cuba, but that whole trip was made up by the CIA.
>
> Since there was no Cuban embassy in the U.S. Oswald went to Mexico
> City to try to get a visa. Apparently he was under the impression
> that he would have no trouble obtaining a visa at the Cuban Embassy in
> Mexico City.
Perhaps, maybe, possibly, the real ISSUE is there is NO real evidence
showing LHO ever went to the embassies in Mexico City. NONE.
Anything you or LNers say is just theory, NOT fact. Believe me, if
the CIA could have shown LHO was there they would have.
> Where did Oswald get the idea that he could get that visa?? Someone
> in New orleans who Oswald believed was one of Castro's agents must
> have told him that he would set it up for Oswald, and all he'd have to
> do was go there and pick up his visa.
But this is all guesswork, there is NO proof for this so why go down
this road?
> But either the Cuban that
> Oswald thought was one of Castro's agent was not what Oswald thought
> he was ....or the Cuban Ambassador was fooled by Oswald's phoney
> portfolio.
More speculation and guesswork, I don't see anything real coming out
of trying to prove LHO was going to hijack a plane to Cuba. There is
soooo much real stuff to prove, why mess with this stuff?
tomnln
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message news:...
>
> "Walt" <papakoc...@evertek.net> wrote in message
> news:79d33b80-dbb7-4e9b...@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Wally World wrote;
>
> Rob, You're just gonna haffta get yer head outta yer ass.....
>
> Haven't you ever seen a signed affidavit, with nortary seal, that
> Oswald wrote that he was planning to hi-jack an airliner and forcing
> the pilot to fly him to Cuba??
>
>
>
>
>
>
> There is NO affidavit signed by Oswald showing a plan to hijack a plane to
> Cuba.
>
> Just add this Bullshit to the List of Wally's Lyin Stupid Bastard Wild
> Speculations.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> > Oswald was looking for a way to get into Cuba without sneaking
>> > in...... He was looking for a way that would make him appear to be a
>> > disgrintled American and a supporter of Castro's revolution.
>>
Walt
> "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message news:...
>
> > Wally World wrote;
>
> > Rob, You're just gonna haffta get yer head outta yer ass.....
>
> > Haven't you ever seen a signed affidavit, with nortary seal, that
> > Oswald wrote that he was planning to hi-jack an airliner and forcing
> > the pilot to fly him to Cuba??
>
> > I write;
>
> > There is NO affidavit signed by Oswald showing a plan to hijack a plane to
> > Cuba.
Psssst Tommy, you're nearly as dumb as Robbie.....
Apparently neither of you noticed that I asked a really absurd
question??
Haven't you ever seen a signed affidavit, with nortary seal, that
Oswald wrote that he was planning to hi-jack an airliner and forcing
the pilot to fly him to Cuba??
Do you really think that Oswald would have written an affidavit in
front of a notary which said that he was planning to hi-jack an
airplane???
Are you that senile??
Robbie was asking for proof that Oswald was planning to hi-jack an
airplane.
He was asking for the absurd so I ansered with an absurd question.
>
> > Just add this Bullshit to the List of Wally's Lyin Stupid Bastard Wild
> > Speculations.
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >> > Oswald was looking for a way to get into Cuba without sneaking
> >> > in...... He was looking for a way that would make him appear to be a
> >> > disgrintled American and a supporter of Castro's revolution.
>
> >> Proof please or admit this is your speculation.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
Wally World wrote;
Psssst Tommy, you're nearly as dumb as Robbie.....
Apparently neither of you noticed that I asked a really absurd
question??
Haven't you ever seen a signed affidavit, with nortary seal, that
Oswald wrote that he was planning to hi-jack an airliner and forcing
the pilot to fly him to Cuba??
Do you really think that Oswald would have written an affidavit in
front of a notary which said that he was planning to hi-jack an
airplane???
Are you that senile??
Robbie was asking for proof that Oswald was planning to hi-jack an
airplane.
He was asking for the absurd so I ansered with an absurd question.
I write;
It's very difficult to determine when your posts are in jest Wally World;
Just about everything you post here is a Joke !
robcap...@netscape.com
NO, you are lying again, NOTHING new there. You have these stupid
theories to make CTers look bad and when called you run, or attack
with nasty names. Your game is out in the open.
robcap...@netscape.com
> Wally World wrote;
>
> Psssst Tommy, you're nearly as dumb as Robbie.....
>
> Apparently neither of you noticed that I asked a really absurd
> question??
>
> Haven't you ever seen a signed affidavit, with nortary seal, that
> Oswald wrote that he was planning to hi-jack an airliner and forcing
> the pilot to fly him to Cuba??
>
> Do you really think that Oswald would have written an affidavit in
> front of a notary which said that he was planning to hi-jack an
> airplane???
>
> Are you that senile??
>
> Robbie was asking for proof that Oswald was planning to hi-jack an
> airplane.
>
> He was asking for the absurd so I ansered with an absurd question.
>
> I write;
>
> It's very difficult to determine when your posts are in jest Wally World;
>
> Just about everything you post here is a Joke !
>
> Just add this Bullshit to the List of Wally's Lyin Stupid Bastard Wild
> Speculations.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are dead on Tom, like I should have know this was a "joke" as it
sounds as crazy as everything else he says! LOL!! I added it the list
just in case as he isn't really kidding about this as I have heard him
mention this crazy theory of LHO going to Cuba before. Here is the up-
to-date list with the "notorized affadavit" at the bottom.
Walt never proved that the rifle in CE-133A had "Dual Sling Mounts".
Walt never proved that LHO worked for RFK.
Walt never proved that General Walker called Germany.
Walt never proved Mike Paine gave the DPD a copy of the CE-133A photo
on 11/22/63.
Walt never proved the wallet was found "INSIDE" the owner's car
(allegedly LHO’s).
Walt never proved Michael Paine had same model rifle as LHO (Carcano
40”).
Walt never proved General Walker believed LHO shot at him in 4/63.
Walt never proved that Capt. O A Jones said LHO shot AT General Walker
in 4/63.
Walt never proved LHO received a 40” Carcano rifle.
Walt never proved that the bill of lading proved a 40" Carcano was
ordered by LHO.
Walt never proved his claim that LHO shot at General Walker in 4/63.
Walt never proved that LHO ordered a 40” Carcano rifle.
Walt never proved his claim that LHO altered his OWN chin in CE-133A.
Walt never proved his claim that a 6.5mm was fired from a "sabot".
Walt never proved his claim that the CIA was going to "rescue LHO."
Walt never proved there was a clip inside the Carcano when it was
found at the TSBD.
Walt never proved LHO ordered a rifle that was easily traceable so he
could shoot at Gen. Walker with it.
Walt never proved Marcello was a "payroll runner" for RFK.
Walt never proved that Truly held a “roll call” and LHO was the ONLY
one missing.
Walt never proved the casings found at the TSBD (6.5mm ammo) came from
a Marine Corps order for the CIA.
Walt never proved DeMohrenschildt actually owned the 40” Carcano
allegedly ordered from Klein’s.
Walt never proved that the bullet recovered from Walker shooting was
copper-jacketed.
Walt never proved 133A (deMohrenschildt BY photo) came from the SAME
negative as CE-133A.
Walt never proved LHO went to Mexico City in Sept./Oct. 1963.
Walt never proved his claim that the DPD showed Weitzman a Mauser on
11/22/63.
Walt never proved that George DeMohrenschildt purchased the money
order used allegedly for the Carcano rifle order.
Walt never proved Marina did in fact take CE-133A (backyard photo),
and it is AUTHENTIC.
Walt never proved Fritz was just sloppy when timing the arrest report
ELEVEN minutes BEFORE LHO was arrested.
Walt never proved the weight listed on the “Bill of lading” was TARE
weight.
Walt never proved the weight of the 40” Carcano is 7.5LBS when the ad
the WC used says 7.0LBS.
Walt never proved a “signed affadavit with a notary seal” signed by
the LHO saying he was going to hijack a plane and make the pilot fly
him to Cuba EVER existed. He claims it is a "joke" but with him who
knows?
tomnln
"robcap...@netscape.com" <robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:28d2408d-ae21-496f...@l42g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------限-------------------------------------------------
Gil Jesus
treated for a wound.
You all know that Walker WAS sent to a state mental hospital for
evaluation following the riots at Ole Miss, right ?
Funny, when a CT witness is "committed" they have no credibility.
But when it's a LN witness, they're an example of truth and
dependability.
What a joke.
Walt
Dear Stupid..... It wasn't a "JOKE". It was merely an absurd answer
to your absurd question. You're so damned stupid that you believe
there is "proof" for every tiny detail. Clandestine operators don't
leave "proof" of their skullduggery lying around.......ya dumbass.
The fact that you were too damned dumb to know that only a total idiot
would go to a notary and sign an affidavit that he was on his way to
hi-jack an airplane, reveals just what a stupid bastard you are.
I've posted proof for you about many of the facts of the case but
you're too stupid to know that 7.5 X 100 = 750, so you reject the
proof.
> knows?- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
"Walt" <papakoc...@evertek.net> wrote in message
news:c5f40456-22e0-4787...@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wally World wrote;
Dear Stupid..... It wasn't a "JOKE". It was merely an absurd answer
to your absurd question. You're so damned stupid that you believe
there is "proof" for every tiny detail. Clandestine operators don't
leave "proof" of their skullduggery lying around.......ya dumbass.
The fact that you were too damned dumb to know that only a total idiot
would go to a notary and sign an affidavit that he was on his way to
hi-jack an airplane, reveals just what a stupid bastard you are.
I've posted proof for you about many of the facts of the case but
you're too stupid to know that 7.5 X 100 = 750, so you reject the
proof.
I write;
Just smart enough to FORCE you to RUN from your own Stupid Bastard "claims".
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Burb,
The *General Offense Report* filed by the DPD at the time mentions
that Walker was wounded in the arm. That's miles before Walker
testified to the same thing to the WC.
Walt and Gil have no desire to deal with this fact, so are trying to
pretend the General Offense Report doesn't exist.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
robcap...@netscape.com
> The fact that you were too damned dumb to know that only a total idiot
> would go to a notary and sign an affidavit that he was on his way to
> hi-jack an airplane, reveals just what a stupid bastard you are.
> I've posted proof for you about many of the facts of the case but
> you're too stupid to know that 7.5 X 100 = 750, so you reject the
> proof.
Sure, dimwit claims there is a "notarized signed affadavit" by LHO in
response to my query for Proof of his claim LHO was going to "hijack"
a plane to Cuba! How is this my fault? Now he says there is NO proof
as "Clandestine operators don't leave "proof" of their skullduggery
lying around", but that is NOT what he said yesterday. I think he is
"back-tacking" rapidly as it is obvious he was caught in another LIE!
At least I can remove the part saying he thought it was joke, as I
think he would have let this "pass for proof" if I didn't push him.
He lies constantly, so if he could have gotten away with the
"notorized signed affadavit" excuse he would have, I'm very sure of
that!
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Gilly,
Doesn't it say, in the General Offense Report of 4/10/63, as published
in the WCR volumes, the following?:
QUOTE ON:
Compl was hit in the right arm between elbow and wrist by either 2
slivers from the bullet, or wood, or pieces of glass.
QUOTE OFF
Is that the police report you were after, Gilly? The *Compl* BTW,
stands for complainant, who, in this particular circumstance, is
General Walker. Isn't that so, Gil?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Gilly,
Say, I believe that if you read the General Offense Report it states
that Walker did not wish to seek medical treatment for his injuries,
Gil.
That must be why there is no medical cite for this particular
circumstance, Gil.
Do you need a copy of the General Offense Report pertaining to the
Walker shooting, Gil? Not much use relying on Walt to find it, I
imagine, LOL! :-)
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Gil Jesus
Did you know that Walker was sent to a state mental hospital for
evaluation following the riots at Ole Miss ?
Did you know that he was the leader of the John Birch Society in
Dallas ?
Did you know that the Birchers counted among their membership many
police officers and law enforcement officials ?
TIMMY SAID OSWALD WOUNDED WALKER
1. We're still waiting for those medical records that show that Walker
was treated for a wound.
2. We're still waiting for the physical PROOF that connects Oswald
with the ammunition used in the Walker shooting.
3. We're still waiting for the physical PROOF that Oswald buried the
rifle after shooting at Walker.
4. We're still waiting for the proof that the only witness who claimed
Oswald shot at Walker was a reliable witness.
We keep waiting for the evidence, but it is not forthcoming. Why not,
Timmy ?
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Gilly,
Say, you must have missed this from the General Offense Report filed
by Detectives Van Cleave and McElroy in relation to the Walker
shooting:
QUOTE ON:
Compl does not think medical attention was necessary for his arm.
QUOTE OFF
Compl, in this circumstance, stands for complainant, doesn't it, Gil?
And the complainant in this particular circumstance is General Edwin A
Walker, Gilly.
There's your answer, Gilly.
As for the rest of your nonsense, the issue we are debating is whether
Walker was wounded by Oswald or not. Stop going off on silly tangents.
It's quite clear that Walker was wounded in the shooting, isn't it
Gil?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
aeffects
Man, ya think those Aussie Lone Neutters would get a handle on case
evidence/testimony <sigh>....
What, no medical records JohnBircher-Walker (Gen.Ret. USArmy) was
wounded? Ole Tim reminds me of those Aussies who did the MC test
shooting into human gel forms a few years back, wayout there in the
Outback (for Discovery or History Channel?). I call that one the great
MC/gaffer-tape shooting exposition in the cherry picker/crane shooting
platform debacle.....
I would worry to much about Timmy there, Gil. I think Timmy was
associated with, in some way, the Gaffer Tape MC shooting debacle-
production. Probably the Producer. He's looking to redeem his sorry
butt....No cigar, Tim. Back to Fresno with ya!
tims...@gmail.com
LOL! Looks like ol' David *aeffects* Healy must be worried. He's
cobbled together a couple of paras in defence of his mate Gil, intead
of the usual, expletive ridden, throwaway one liner.
Dave, old buddy, the question was whether Walker was wounded at the
time of the shooting and I produced various cites to show that he was
and also answered the question of whether he sought medical attention
or not.
The fact that Gil Jesus and Walt Cakebread weren't good enough
researchers to find this stuff themselves isn't my shortcoming. It
simply shows they shouldn't have asserted what they did about Walker
in the first place, without knowing the facts.
Gil Jesus, in particular, simply appears to make stuff up as he goes
along.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
ernie1241
a prominent member but not a leader. Furthermore, in private comments
to the JBS National Council, JBS founder Robert Welch criticized
Walker for his associations with an assortment of bigots in Texas. J.
Edgar Hoover descibed Walker in one FBI memo as "a nut".
tims...@gmail.com
BUMP
tims...@gmail.com
BUMP
aeffects
> cobbled together a couple of paras in defence of his mate Gil, intead
> of the usual, expletive ridden, throwaway one liner.
can't fool me troll, you're working to hard.... Walker was a crackpot,
just like you Lone Nut KOOK's, those to ridicule for their Lone Nut
KOOK obsession/fantasies....
Carry on, KOOK!
tims...@gmail.com
BUMP
aeffects
you still dronning on about this? LMFAO. You Aussie trolls from Fresno
need a life, ANY kind of life! LMFAO!
Walt
> in the WCR volumes, the following?:
>
> QUOTE ON:
>
> Compl was hit in the right arm between elbow and wrist by either 2
> slivers from the bullet, or wood, or pieces of glass.
>
> QUOTE OFF
Dim Tim wrote:....."Doesn't it say, in theGeneralOffense Report of
4/10/63, as published in the WCR volumes, the following?:"
QUOTE ON:
Compl was hit in the right arm between elbow and wrist by either 2
slivers from the bullet, or wood, or pieces of glass.
QUOTE OFF
The cop who typed up the report OBVIOUSLY was taking Walker's word
that he was..." hit in the right arm by slivers of the bullet, or
wood, or pieces of glass." The cop wasn't there at the time of the
shooting so he could only take Walker's word that he had been hit by
"something" at the time the shot was fired. Since there are many
examples of Walker's lying we KNOW that he was a liar. On that
basis...... we are justified in doubting that Walker was telling the
truth.
But even if Walker was actually hit by flying debris of some sort.....
That's a far cry from the exaggerated claim that of the LNer's, that
General Walker was " WOUNDED" during the shooting.
>
> Is that the police report you were after, Gilly? The *Compl* BTW,
> stands for complainant, who, in this particular circumstance, isGeneralWalker. Isn't that so, Gil?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> On Nov 18, 10:53 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Timmy, any police reports, medical reports, anything other than just
> >Walker's"word" that he was wounded or required medical help ?
>
> > I'm looking for documentation from more than one source that would
> > corroborate his story, Timmy.
>
> > Keep looking.- Hide quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Walt,
It took you THAT long to come up with a weak response like THAT?!!
The cop who wrote the report was actually on the scene.
If the cop didn't see Walker bleeding from the arm, he wouldn't have
put it in his report, Walt.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Dec 27, 12:02 am, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:
> On 4 Dec, 19:50, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > TOP POST
>
> > Hi Gilly,
>
> > Doesn't it say, in theGeneralOffense Report of 4/10/63, as published
> > in the WCR volumes, the following?:
>
> > QUOTE ON:
>
> > Compl was hit in the right arm between elbow and wrist by either 2
> > slivers from the bullet, or wood, or pieces of glass.
>
> > QUOTE OFF
> Dim Tim wrote:....."Doesn't it say, in theGeneralOffense Report of
>
> 4/10/63, as published in the WCR volumes, the following?:"
>
> QUOTE ON:
>
> Compl was hit in the right arm between elbow and wrist by either 2
> slivers from the bullet, or wood, or pieces of glass.
>
> QUOTE OFF
>
> The cop who typed up the report OBVIOUSLY was takingWalker'sword
> that he was..." hit in the right arm by slivers of the bullet, or
> wood, or pieces of glass." The cop wasn't there at the time of the
> shooting so he could only takeWalker'sword that he had been hit by
> "something" at the time the shot was fired. Since there are many
> examples ofWalker'slying we KNOW that he was a liar. On that
> basis...... we are justified in doubting thatWalkerwas telling the
> truth.
>
> But even ifWalkerwas actually hit by flying debris of some sort.....
> That's a far cry from the exaggerated claim that of the LNer's, that
> GeneralWalkerwas "WOUNDED" during the shooting.
>
>
>
> > Is that the police report you were after, Gilly? The *Compl* BTW,
> > stands for complainant, who, in this particular circumstance, isGeneralWalker. Isn't that so, Gil?
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Tim Brennan
> > Sydney, Australia
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> > On Nov 18, 10:53 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > Timmy, any police reports, medical reports, anything other than just
> > >Walker's"word" that he waswoundedor required medical help ?
tims...@gmail.com
BUMP