YOHARVEY TO DVP: "my mistake was nothing compared to mistakes made by VB in his book"
Gil Jesus
MADE MISTAKES IN HIS BOOK........
"my mistake was nothing compared to mistakes made by VB in
his book."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/39ab09ad9d1d7be9
YoHarvey
Gilbert Chico Jesus apparently is under the belief that I, like many
found VB's book to be perfect. It was not.
No tome of 1600 plus pages can be perfect. Anybody with an education
realizes this. Then again, we are dealing with our pathological lying
homophobic racist. Since Jesus has absolutely NOTHING to contribute
to JFK research, he instead decides to jump on a comment showing my
honesty. Honesty is a word totally foreign to our pathological
misfit...whose own mother came onto the internet praying to God her
son Gilbert would find a job. People? It's important to understand
his mothers motives. Gilbert is in his mid 50's, never married,
prefers youngs boys to women and lives in squalor in a 650 square foot
doublewide selling used car parts from his backyard.
And you wonder why he is unable to contribute to intelligent, rational
thought?
David Von Pein
LOL.
Right on (kook) cue.
I knew that Yo's "mistakes by VB" remark would bring the kooks to the
surface yet again (and, naturally, with a new and useless thread).
Of course Yo knows Vince made some mistakes in his book "RH". Why is
that such a bolt from heaven?
Good God, Gilbert, I've written up lengthy posts and articles
chronicling the errors I've found in Vincent's book.
Haven't you seen any of these posts? I certainly haven't been hiding
them:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/947d25e8fac5b996
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ac345c6c5a9afaf2
YoHarvey
David? Reading his not Jesus's forte. That requires education. He
only looks through CT books. Can't you tell?
tims...@gmail.com
LOL! Gilly only looks at the pictures these days! Any document he
fumblingly attempts to interpret always comes back to bite him in the
ass.
Hey Gilly! Didja work out yet that Oswald wounded Walker when he
attempted to kill him? It's in the 26 volumes, Gil.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c855e15b-8e06-4595...@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
LOL! Gilly only looks at the pictures these days! Any document he
fumblingly attempts to interpret always comes back to bite him in the
ass.
Hey Gilly! Didja work out yet that Oswald wounded Walker when he
attempted to kill him? It's in the 26 volumes, Gil.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Looks like Timmy doesn't know anything about the Walker shooting.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
Just like he doesn't know anything about Mexico City.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef388493-bc55-49b0...@l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
Buy the scotch ya cheap Bastard;
Your wife's tired of turning $0.35 Tricks to keep me comfortable.
SEE Yo(Momma)Harvey HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
Gil Jesus
>
> Looks like Timmy doesn't know anything about the Walker shooting.
>
> SEE>>> �http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>
> Just like he doesn't know anything about Mexico City.
>
> SEE>>> �http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
It's a real hoot to watch these trolls trying desperately to change
the subject of this YoHarvey gaffe.
They are REALLY upset............ROFLMAO
I can't wait for .john's next nationwide search for ignoramuses to
destroy a.c.j.
This bunch will be a hard act to follow.
Gil Jesus
Not knowing whether ot not someone is alive IS a BIG mistake.
It would be the equivalent of Bugliosi saying that JFK, Oswald or
Tippit was alive.
So, I agree that YoHarvey's error is NOTHING like the errors in
Bugliosi's book.
IT'S WORSE.
YoHarvey
Apparently in your typically limited fashion, you actually believe
knowing whether one is alive or dead is WORSE than:
Calling a distinguished American a "scumbag"?
Claiming that John or Nellie Connally shot JFK?
Not having enough education to know Ed. at the bottom of a piece of
paper stands for "editor" and not the name Ed?
The good news is your days are numbered. Now that's good news.
aeffects
the boobsey-twerps, all three, one atop the other.... how quaint!
ROFLMFAO!
tims...@gmail.com
So, tomnln, you are claiming here that I am wrong in stating that
Walker was wounded, is that right?
Why have you since posted testimony from the 26 volumes showing that
he WAS wounded and simply tried to dodge the fact that you made a
mistake on that other thread, tomnln?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Nov 30, 4:19 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ed842dab-0ca0-45d7...@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
So, tomnln, you are claiming here that I am wrong in stating that
Walker was wounded, is that right?
Why have you since posted testimony from the 26 volumes showing that
he WAS wounded and simply tried to dodge the fact that you made a
mistake on that other thread, tomnln?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you that Embarrased over your Lies Timmy?
That you must claim that I denied that Walker was wounded Timmy???
I "Never" denied that Walker was wounded by a shot from someone OTHER than
Oswald.
Walker even said he did NOT believe that the shot casme from Oswald.
Even the evidence/testimony shows that the shot did NOT come from Oswald>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
Is this why you continue to RUN from the crimes comitted by the
authorities?>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
Please address thiose Timmy ! !
You KNOW how much I enjoy beating the snot outta you with your own
evidence/testimony.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
LOL! Hey tomnln, I think anyone reading the original exchange would
conclude that you were saying Walker wasn't wounded in the shooting.
Do you want me to post it again, tomnln?
Your latest explanation is implausible, tomnln.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Dec 1, 6:40 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ed842dab-0ca0-45d7...@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> So, tomnln, you are claiming here that I am wrong in stating that
> Walker was wounded, is that right?
>
> Why have you since posted testimony from the 26 volumes showing that
> he WAS wounded and simply tried to dodge the fact that you made a
> mistake on that other thread, tomnln?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Are you that Embarrased over your Lies Timmy?
>
> That you must claim that I denied that Walker was wounded Timmy???
>
> I "Never" denied that Walker was wounded by a shot from someone OTHER than
> Oswald.
>
> Walker even said he did NOT believe that the shot casme from Oswald.
>
> Even the evidence/testimony shows that the shot did NOT come from Oswald>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>
> Is this why you continue to RUN from the crimes comitted by the
> authorities?>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
tomnln
Oswald.
What part of that don't you understsand Timmy?
Is this your way of Avoiding the authorities "Evidence Tampering" Timmy???
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:55723ec1-5dcb-4461...@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Gil Jesus
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�----------------------------------------------
> Are you that Embarrased over your Lies Timmy?
>
> That you must claim that I denied that Walker was wounded Timmy???
>
> I "Never" denied that Walker was wounded by a shot from someone OTHER than
> Oswald.
>
> Walker even said he did NOT believe that the shot casme from Oswald.
>
> Even the evidence/testimony shows that the shot did NOT come from Oswald>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>
> Is this why you continue to RUN from the crimes comitted by the
> authorities?>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> Please address thiose Timmy ! !
>
> You KNOW how much I enjoy beating the snot outta you with your own
> evidence/testimony.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�---------------------------------------------
Timmy's claim was that Oswald wounded Walker.
1. I asked for documentation showing that Walker required medical
attention.
Timmy ran from that.
2. I asked Timmy for physical proof that Oswald buried the rifle.
Timmy ran from that.
3. I asked Timmy for proof that Oswald had any gun-cleaning equipment
or materials among his possessions at the time of his arrest.
Timmy ran from that.
No one ever denied that Walker SAID he had been wounded. Walker
claimed that he had "slivers" of the bullet jacket in his arm.
Where were the "slivers" in Governor Connally and JFK, Timmy ? Why did
the bullets in Dealey Plaza not "sliver" and the bullet in the Walker
shooting not break up ?
Marina Oswald was the only "witness" to tie LHO to the Walker
shooting. She also claimed that he told her that he buried the rifle.
She also claimed to have barricaded him in the bathroom and had more
strength than him, enough to hold him there against his will.
Was Marina threatened with deportation if she didn't "cooperate",
Timmy ?
Witnesses claimed that TWO men fled the scene of the shooting.
Timmy has supplied us with NO EVIDENCE that Oswald wounded Walker.
NONE.
tims...@gmail.com
LOL! Hey, Gilly, did you really write the following?:
QUOTE ON:
Timmy has supplied us with NO EVIDENCE that Oswald wounded Walker.
NONE.
QUOTE OFF
Gilly, didn't I supply you with both evidence AND testimony from the
26 volumes to this effect? Of course I did.
Now you choose to hide behind this pathetic subterfuge as to whether
Walker required medical treatment or not.
The fact is, Walker was hurt the day that Oswald fired at him; isn't
that the case Gilly?
A yes or no response will suffice, Gilly.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Dec 4, 8:58 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2:40 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Are you that Embarrased over your Lies Timmy?
>
> > That you must claim that I denied that Walker was wounded Timmy???
>
> > I "Never" denied that Walker was wounded by a shot from someone OTHER than
> > Oswald.
>
> > Walker even said he did NOT believe that the shot casme from Oswald.
>
> > Even the evidence/testimony shows that the shot did NOT come from Oswald>>>
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>
> > Is this why you continue to RUN from the crimes comitted by the
> > authorities?>>>
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/CASE...
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/CASE...
>
> > Please address thiose Timmy ! !
>
> > You KNOW how much I enjoy beating the snot outta you with your own
> > evidence/testimony.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gil Jesus
> TOP POST
>
> LOL! Hey, Gilly, did you really write the following?:
>
> QUOTE ON:
>
> Timmy has supplied us with NO EVIDENCE that Oswald wounded Walker.
>
> NONE.
>
> QUOTE OFF
>
> Gilly, didn't I supply you with both evidence AND testimony from the
> 26 volumes to this effect? Of course I did.
>
> Now you choose to hide behind this pathetic subterfuge as to whether
> Walker required medical treatment or not.
Timmy:
WE ASKED YOU FOR PROOF THAT WALKER WAS WOUNDED BY OSWALD
1. FIRST, WE ASKED YOU FOR PROOF WALKER WAS WOUNDED
On Nov. 17th, I asked you for "medical records" stating that Walker
required medical attention.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/f10c029cfdce1563
Then, Walt asked you for proof that Walker required medical attention.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/f763139751dbad10
Why do we ask for medical records, Timmy ?
As proof that Walker wasn't lying under oath to the WC. As proof that
Walker's Bircher pals on the police dept weren't lying for him. As
proof that IF Walker was wounded, the wound wasn't self-inflicted.
To remove ANY doubt, Timmy, that the events occurred exactly as he
said they did.
Medical records would go a long way in achieving that end.
2. THEN, I ASKED YOU FOR PROOF IT WAS OSWALD WHO DID IT
Since Marina claimed that Oswald told her that he shot at Walker, and
since she also claimed that he told her that he buried the rifle, I
asked you if there was any soil or dirt found by the FBI in their
examination of the rifle on November 23, 1963.
You ran from that question
Given the possibility that the rifle may have been cleaned in the
timeframe of April-November, 1963, I then asked you if any gun-
cleaning equipment or material was found among Oswald's possessions
during the police searches of November 22-23, 1963.
You ran from that question
Timmy, you've supplied us with the testimony of a man who was relieved
of his command for indoctrinating lies into the minds of his troops.
You've back that up with a police report from the people who removed
Kennedy's protection for the Dallas motorcade and led him into an
ambush.
And you top that off with testimony from the alleged assassin's widow,
who was threatened with deportation if she didn't "cooperate" with the
investigation.
And THAT you call proof.
Chuck Schuyler
>
> Timmy:
>
> WE ASKED YOU FOR PROOF THAT WALKER WAS WOUNDED BY OSWALD
>
> 1. FIRST, WE ASKED YOU FOR PROOF WALKER WAS WOUNDED
Gil, he provided you with information from the WCR. You may not like
the evidence, but there it is.
>
> On Nov. 17th, I asked you for "medical records" stating that Walker
> required medical attention.
> Then, Walt asked you for proof that Walker required medical attention.
I'll look at the links to the WCR that Walker sought out medical
attention. I'll bet he may have had to change his drawers, though.
> Why do we ask for medical records, Timmy ?
>
> As proof that Walker wasn't lying under oath to the WC. As proof that
> Walker's Bircher pals on the police dept weren't lying for him. As
> proof that IF Walker was wounded, the wound wasn't self-inflicted.
>
> To remove ANY doubt, Timmy, that the events occurred exactly as he
> said they did.
Sort of like how the JFK autopsy removes any doubt that Kennedy was
struck once in the head from behind, and once in the upper back from
behind with the bullet exiting his throat?
>
> Medical records would go a long way in achieving that end.
Oh, c'mon, you old dyed-in-the-wool CTer...you'd simply claim that the
medical records were forged. You'd claim that the records were
'produced' after Kennedy was killed to lay a trail at Oswald's feet.
You wouldn't believe medical records related to the Walker shooting
anymore than the medical records surrounding JFK.
>
> 2. THEN, I ASKED YOU FOR PROOF IT WAS OSWALD WHO DID IT
A pretty good indication is the fact that he told his wife he did it.
>
> Since Marina claimed that Oswald told her that he shot at Walker, and
> since she also claimed that he told her that he buried the rifle, I
> asked you if there was any soil or dirt found by the FBI in their
> examination of the rifle on November 23, 1963.
>
> You ran from that question
Did the FBI specifically check the rifle for 'dirt'?
Here's a stupid idea: A team of Discovery Channel researchers could
petition to have the Carcano re-examined (again). Microscopic soil
depsoits possibly could be found embedded in the rifle, which could
then be compared to soil samples from around Walker's old residence. A
crack team of forensic geologists could then run the two soil
comparisons through University super-computers with the latest 21st
century whiz-bang technology to see if there is a match. Then we could
all have some new, ridiculous piece of trivial baloney packaged in a
sixty minute T.V. show to argue over for another twenty years.
>
> Given the possibility that the rifle may have been cleaned in the
> timeframe of April-November, 1963, I then asked you if any gun-
> cleaning equipment or material was found among Oswald's possessions
> during the police searches of November 22-23, 1963.
>
> You ran from that question
He didn't 'run' from your question. You're questions are generally
childish and nonsensical. Just because you ask a question doesn't mean
it deserves a response. You're certainly not shy about running from
questions, by the way. Is your claim that if no cleaning materials
were found among his possessions that the gun couldn't have been
cleaned?
>
> Timmy, you've supplied us with the testimony of a man who was relieved
> of his command for indoctrinating lies into the minds of his troops.
You're digging a deeper hole. He provided you with evidence that
Walker had been slightly injured in the shooting incident. You learned
something new about the events surrounding 11/22/63 that you
apparently didn't know (no surprise there). If you really are a
'student' of the JFK assassination, you should be grateful...instead,
you're mad that your little CT world has crumbled a bit more.
> You've back that up with a police report from the people who removed
> Kennedy's protection for the Dallas motorcade and led him into an
> ambush.
Um, this may come as a shocked to a police wanna-be flunkie like you,
but most cops are honest, hard working and try their best to SOLVE
crimes. Their families live in nearby communities, and they probably
don't want some nut with a gun running around. Tim provides evidence,
and you, with no evidence, paint the cops involved in the Walker
attempted shooting investigation as part of a broad, 'plot' to strip
protection from the JFK motorcade. This is the thinking of an ill,
juvenile mind.
> And you top that off with testimony from the alleged assassin's widow,
> who was threatened with deportation if she didn't "cooperate" with the
> investigation.
Um, is she still threatened with deportation, dunce? The last I knew,
she still stands by the Walker narrative. You're sick, and immature.
Tim schooled you, and you're resorting to a little girly-man hissy-
fit.
>
> And THAT you call proof.
It's called evidence.
There isn't anything anyone could provide you that you would consider
PROOF. Admit it.
Take a break today, Gil. Straighten up the auto parts around the
doublewide and go for a walk or something. Drop a few coins into a
Salvation Army kettle and breath the air. Give Thanks that you're
alive, and spend a day away from the JFK assassination. Life is
precious. Stop wasting it on trying to find out who killed JFK.
The WCR got it right over four decades ago.
aeffects
Chuckie daShoe, yopu still showing your face around here? After
dragging your entire family into this mess, then blaming it on your
brother? LMFAO.... Grow up son, cut your loses, we know.......get
another ALIAS, ya moron!
Gil Jesus
> Take a break today, Gil. Straighten up the auto parts around the
> doublewide and go for a walk or something. Drop a few coins into a
> Salvation Army kettle and breath the air. Give Thanks that you're
> alive, and spend a day away from the JFK assassination. Life is
> precious. Stop wasting it on trying to find out who killed JFK.
ROFLMAO...Maybe I should make believe I'm a relative, huh ?
tomnln
Timmy Always RUNS from his own evidence/testimony>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
Especially these>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
Timmy thinks it was the Oswald from Mexico City who was....
5 foot 3 inches tall
Blond Haired
119 pounds
Spoke "Broken Russian".
http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:df4319ca-04c9-4535...@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
Chuck Schuyler
We'd make you find a job!
tims...@gmail.com
Hey Gilly, did you actually just write this nonsense?:
QUOTE ON:
> WE ASKED YOU FOR PROOF THAT WALKER WAS WOUNDED BY OSWALD
>
> 1. FIRST, WE ASKED YOU FOR PROOF WALKER WAS WOUNDED
>
> On Nov. 17th, I asked you for "medical records" stating that Walker
> required medical attention.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/f10c029cfdce1563
>
QUOTE OFF
If people click on that link you provided, they will see that you
actually asked:
QUOTE ON:
Timmy, any police reports, medical reports, anything other than just
Walker's "word" that he was wounded or required medical help ?
QUOTE OFF
I referenced the General Offense Report that is in the WC volumes but
you didn't like that, did you Gilly?
That's after already supplying you with the relevant WC cite from
Walker's testimony.
Anyone can see that you're lying, Gil. You asked for a police report.
I gave you a police report. Now you've gone off on some silly tangent,
claiming you asked for *medical reports* only.
That's clearly a lie, isn't it Gil?
Why did you lie, Gil?
Was it because the General Offense Report includes the following?:
QUOTE ON:
Compl was hit in the right arm between elbow and wrist by either 2
slivers from the bullet, or wood, or pieces of glass.
QUOTE OFF
*Compl*, of course, stands for complainant, who in this instance Is
General Edwin A. Walker, isn't that so, Gil?
Looking forward to your explanation of why you lied, Gil.
When will you be providing it?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tims...@gmail.com
BUMP