Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

MARK LANE VS. VINCENT BUGLIOSI & TOM HANKS

82 views
Skip to first unread message

David Von Pein

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 11:53:20 PM3/5/10
to

Subject: Mark Lane
Date: 3/5/2010 8:44:26 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: David Von Pein
To: Rosemary Newton (Vincent Bugliosi's secretary)

------------------------


Hi Rosemary,

The link at the bottom of this e-mail message contains a short 10-
minute audio interview with conspiracy kook Mark Lane. The interview,
which took place on March 4, 2010, is one that I thought Vincent
Bugliosi would want to hear. (Maybe you can bookmark the link so you
can cue it up for Vince the next time he comes to your house, since he
doesn't have a computer to access it himself.)

In this brief interview, among other assorted unflattering and
laughable comments he makes about Vince B., Mark Lane says that
Vincent Bugliosi--are you sitting down?--"knows nothing about the
Kennedy assassination".

And this is a guy (Mark Lane) who threatened to sue Bugliosi a few
years ago because of the so-called "lies" that Vince said about Lane
in "Reclaiming History". It sounds to me as if Vince might be able to
turn the tables on Mr. Lane when it comes to slander and/or libel
lawsuits.

Can you just imagine the monster-sized gonads it takes to go on an
Internet radio program (in the year 2010, three years after
"Reclaiming History" was published!) and make the outrageous claim
that Vincent Bugliosi "knows nothing about the Kennedy assassination"?
It takes some oversized family jewels to do something like that
indeed!

Mr. Bugliosi is a person who worked for over 20 years writing the
definitive book on the JFK case, and now, three years after that book
was released, we hear it from Mark Lane that Vincent "knows nothing"
about the JFK case at all!

There oughta be a law on the books to keep such outright nonsense off
of the radio (or anywhere else).

In my opinion, what it boils down to is this -- the conspiracy-happy
nuts in America (including Mark Lane) are blowing off steam and are
getting hotter under the collar with each passing day due to the fact
that Tom Hanks and Company are going forward with their "Reclaiming
History" Home Box Office mini-series. And the fact that such an
"Oswald Did It Alone" movie project is being worked on is simply
driving the conspiracy theorists crazy.

And, you know what? I'm loving it! These JFK conspiracy nuts (like Mr.
Lane and many others) have had their undeserved moment in the sun for
too long. It's time that these charlatans and evidence-manipulators
are taken down a peg or two (or 152)!

I say BRAVO to Vincent Bugliosi, Tom Hanks, Bill Paxton, Gary
Goetzman, and Home Box Office for bringing the TRUE FACTS of Lee
Harvey Oswald's LONE GUILT in the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy to the doorsteps of all Americans....which is where that truth
should reside--for all time.

And if Mark Lane objects -- that's just tough shit!

Here's the link to Lane's hilarious and ridiculous (but thankfully
brief) Internet radio appearance from March 4th, 2010:

http://www.Box.net/shared/zyfi80ppq9

Should Mr. Bugliosi want to make any kind of a reply or statement
after listening to the above-linked tripe that was spewed forth by
Mark Lane, I would (as always) be happy to relay any such message via
the "Internet" airwaves.

Best regards,
David Von Pein

=========================================================

Subject: Mark Lane (Addendum)
Date: 3/5/2010 10:46:42 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: David Von Pein
To: Rosemary Newton

------------------------

Hi again Rosemary,

Upon listening again to the March 4th Mark Lane radio interview, I
noted Lane saying:


"There is nothing in the Bugliosi book which relates to
reality."


Again, I hope you were seated when you gazed upon that last Lane
quote, because the idiocy within that single statement is enough to
knock all reasonable people right off their feet.

Mr. Lane also referred to Tom Hanks as "a horse's ass".

And Lane also embarrassed himself further by saying this about Vincent
Bugliosi and Vince's book "Reclaiming History":

"He probably never even wrote the book."

It's that dreaded "ghostwriting" rumor coming back to the surface once
again, I see. And this keeps cropping up occasionally, even after you
yourself, Rosemary, chopped it down to size in July of 2007 when you
thoroughly trashed that rumor, which was started by David Lifton in
May 2007 [see link below].

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/0e979f2e0dcef694

So, it would appear that I haven't been giving Mark Lane nearly enough
credit in the past -- because he's a much bigger kook than I had
originally thought he was before today.

Congratulations, Mark, on getting the promotion.

Thanks again, Rosemary, for reading my mails.

Yours truly,
David V.P.


=========================================================


Subject: Mark Lane
Date: 3/5/2010 1:34:09 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: Rosemary Newton
To: David Von Pein

------------------------

Hi Dave,

Thanks so much for your e-mails. Incredible! I faxed them to Vince and
I'm sure he'll see the light about his erroneous slant of the
assassination. Perhaps Tom Hanks (aka "a horse's ass") will too.

Regards, Rosemary

P.S. I have more patience with my six-year-old grandson.


=========================================================


http://Box.net/static/flash/box_explorer.swf?widget_hash=95ybmxvkhn&v=0&cl=0

http://Rush-To-Judgment.blogspot.com

http://ReclaimingHistory.blogspot.com

aeffects

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 3:23:18 AM3/6/10
to
On Mar 5, 8:53 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:

no advertising shithead.... and please tell that figment of your
imagination, Rosemary (LMFAO) she's wanted in the squadron room, Vince
has lost his shoes! Get busy boyo!

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 7:22:02 AM3/6/10
to

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/8a9ac7ce4c381f4e


http://www.Box.net/shared/zyfi80ppq9

MARK LANE ADDENDUM:

It's also very funny to note that apparently Mark Lane's BIGGEST GRIPE
(i.e., Bugliosi's BIGGEST ERROR) concerning the very little that Lane
read of "Reclaiming History" is when VB got the name of a New York
STREET wrong.

Two or three different times on Black Op Radio Mark Lane has brought
up that sinful and horrible "STREET NAME" error of Bugliosi's.

Out of all the things related to the complex details surrounding
everything in the JFK case, Mark Lane has focused on VB's tiny error
about the name of a street and has propped up that mistake as a
springboard to disregard a whole bunch of other stuff in Vincent's
mammoth book.

Kind of gives you a clue at how deep Mr. Lane had to search to find
something FACTUALLY INCORRECT in "Reclaiming History". Of course, Lane
thinks the whole "RH" book is factually incorrect (naturally). But
virtually everything else (except the silly "street name" error) is
stuff that Lane, in his own conspiracy-oriented mind, only THINKS
Bugliosi has got all wrong.

But when weighed against the TRUE FACTS of the case, a conspiracy
kook's speculation and guesswork (sprinkled with a few lies and half-
truths along the way) couldn't possibly matter less in the long run.

http://RUSH-TO-JUDGMENT.blogspot.com

Message has been deleted

aeffects

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 2:42:49 PM3/6/10
to

Bud

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 6:00:59 PM3/6/10
to

Isn`t there a transvestite you should be freebasing with?

aeffects

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 6:23:22 PM3/6/10
to

anyone else hear a bit of lone nut whining?

Bud

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 7:28:21 PM3/6/10
to

Theres no "h" in winning, retard.

Ed Dolan

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 8:16:34 PM3/6/10
to
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/0e979f2e0dce...

>
> So, it would appear that I haven't been giving Mark Lane nearly enough
> credit in the past -- because he's a much bigger kook than I had
> originally thought he was before today.
>
> Congratulations, Mark, on getting the promotion.
>
> Thanks again, Rosemary, for reading my mails.
>
> Yours truly,
> David V.P.


I wonder if Lane would realy sue Buglosi. After all Lane failed to
sue Andrews and Mitrokhin when they published that Lane was paid $1500
by the KGB. Their book was first published the UK where libel suits
are easier to pursue. Andrews has been in the states several times
as well since since it was published so Lane could have sued him here.
s/f Dolan


>
> =========================================================
>
> Subject: Mark Lane
> Date: 3/5/2010 1:34:09 PM Eastern Standard Time
> From: Rosemary Newton
> To: David Von Pein
>
> ------------------------
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks so much for your e-mails. Incredible! I faxed them to Vince and
> I'm sure he'll see the light about his erroneous slant of the
> assassination. Perhaps Tom Hanks (aka "a horse's ass") will too.
>
> Regards, Rosemary
>
> P.S. I have more patience with my six-year-old grandson.
>
> =========================================================
>

> http://Box.net/static/flash/box_explorer.swf?widget_hash=95ybmxvkhn&v...
>
> http://Rush-To-Judgment.blogspot.com
>
> http://ReclaimingHistory.blogspot.com

0 new messages