Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion WAS STRETCHER BULLET CE399 "PLANTED" IN PARKLAND HOSPITAL?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Von Pein  
View profile  
 More options Apr 7 2007, 6:28 pm
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
From: "David Von Pein" <davevonp...@aol.com>
Date: 7 Apr 2007 15:28:59 -0700
Local: Sat, Apr 7 2007 6:28 pm
Subject: WAS STRETCHER BULLET CE399 "PLANTED" IN PARKLAND HOSPITAL?
BULLET CE399....."PLANTED", OR NOT?:

================================

A CONSPIRACY THEORIST SAID:

"{There is} NO good witness who places that bullet on Connally's
stretcher. So it's quite plausible to think it was a plant. And how
can we explain the absence of blood or tissue on the bullet?"

DVP NOW UTTERS:

Re. those two things you just mentioned (i.e., "planting" the bullet
on the WRONG stretcher and "planting" a clean bullet).....

I always get kind of a kick out of this argument from the CT
brigade....because the illogic of it is twofold (not to mention the
possible conspiracy-PROVING act that these boob plotters were
performing by supposedly planting a whole bullet prior to 2 PM CST on
Nov. 22, when the plotters could not possibly have known where all of
the "REAL" bullets in the case rested).

What if an extra two or three bullets turned up...discovered, say, by
Dr. Perry or a nurse or by Dr. McClelland or Dr. Shaw?

What would the plotters have done then? They'd be stuck with TOO MANY
BULLETS...thus proving the plot they want so desperately to conceal.

It's just silly to even WANT to plant that bullet, even within a
"LET'S GET OSWALD" patsy plot. Because there's so much OTHER stuff
(gun, prints, shells in the Sniper's Nest, and fragments from his
rifle in the limo) that forever ties Lee Oswald to this murder, it
ain't even funny.

But the Patsy Framers decide they want still MORE stuff -- so they
take a whole bullet from Oswald's rifle and then proceed to plant it
on the WRONG stretcher in the hospital?? And plant it under a mat
where it may not even be recovered at all? And they plant a CLEAN
bullet? Wouldn't they want to bang it up some, or smear a little bit
of blood on it?

Or were these plotters so good that they could foresee the "SBT"
months ahead of time? They KNEW, therefore, to plant a perfect "SBT"-
fitting bullet? I.E., a bullet with just about the right amount of
missing lead (about 2.2 grains) and flattened a tad on one side
(simulating the JBC rib strike).

In other words, they seem to KNOW that that whole, not-very-damaged
bullet would fit in nicely with Specter's "Single-Bullet Theory" come
1964.

Golly, those plotters WERE good.

Footnote -- BTW, when did the conspirators manage to steal Oswald's
Mannlicher-Carcano rifle from the Paine garage in order to get CE399?
And who did this?

Nobody has ever answered those questions...least of all Mr. Oliver
Stone, whose film is like a bible to many CTers I've conversed with.

There are many reasons to know that CE399 was not "planted" in that
hospital at the time when it would have needed to be planted.

Common sense, alone, tells a reasonable person that 399 is a bullet
that injured both victims on 11/22/63 and ended up falling out of John
Connally's thigh onto his stretcher.

There isn't a scrap of hard evidence to support the notion that
Stretcher Bullet CE399 was planted by conspirators inside Parkland
Memorial Hospital on November 22, 1963.

===============================================

RELATED ARTICLES AND WEBLINKS:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/a7cf61c59d09bc05

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/61fe27a14fb7dd35

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/0b30398a449c05b7

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/tomlinso.htm

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sbt.htm

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/cece399.txt

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jbchit.htm

===============================================


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google