Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"It apparently never crossed the minds of the alleged conspirators to simply get rid of the evidence that could convict them."

1 view
Skip to first unread message

David Von Pein

unread,
Sep 24, 2007, 5:10:28 PM9/24/07
to

www.amazon.com/Message-Patricia-Lambert-apology-Bugliosi/forum/Fx2TVHW5I0UEY9A/TxR9QNQTFC20JF/23/ref=cm_cd_et_md_pl/?%5Fencoding=UTF8&cdMsgNo=564&cdAnchor=0393045250&cdSort=oldest&cdMsgID=Mx2X9OP508K4QGD#Mx2X9OP508K4QGD


>>> "Does it not strike you as the least bit strange that the agents are writing down six steps for creating a new paper trail and erasing the old one, and then SAVING IT?" <<<


Indeed. Along these same hilarious "Why The Heck Did They Do It Like
This?" lines, allow me to quote my new favorite LN source (VB, who
else?)......

"If we're to believe the theorists, it apparently never crossed the
minds of the alleged conspirators who killed Kennedy to simply get rid
of the evidence that could convict them. Unlike nearly all ordinary
conspirators, Kennedy's killers intentionally and knowingly left
evidence behind in the archives and the Warren Commission volumes that
could expose them -- evidence that only the conspiracists are smart
and industrious enough to uncover." -- VINCENT T. BUGLIOSI, ESQ.; Via
Page #418 of the CD's endnotes in "RECLAIMING HISTORY" (c.2007)

www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/showpost.php?p=3200860

www.DavidVonPein.blogspot.com

Gil Jesus

unread,
Sep 24, 2007, 5:57:23 PM9/24/07
to
And who says that they didn't get rid of the evidence ?

.38 auto shells that become .38 specials

A Mauser that becomes a Mannlicher-Carcano

A large exit wound in the back of the head that becomes a neat little
entry wound

placing a suspect in a police lineup with detectives

suppressing the results of the paraffin test for nine months

cleaning of the limousine

the bullet found on a stretcher that ended up being Connally's despite
it founder saying it was another bullet ?

cleaning of Gov. Connally's coat

the disappearing brain

a bullet hole in the windshield that becomes a crack

a dead secret service agent that didn't die

removing Kennedy's body from Dallas (Why didn't they offer to have Dr.
Rose come to Washington to do the autopsy ?)

hearings in secret

threatening witnesses

intimidating witnesses
i
gnoring witnesses

altering affidavits

forging documents

autopsy x-rays and photographs that don't even match each other

finally, killing the suspect in front of 70 armed officers and
effective silencing him forever.

yeah, this case was really done above-board, idiot.

aeffects

unread,
Sep 24, 2007, 6:02:28 PM9/24/07
to

lest we forget: the *original* in-camera Zapruder film

David Von Pein

unread,
Sep 24, 2007, 6:11:11 PM9/24/07
to
Yeah, I thought my initial post would bring the kooks out of the
woodwork.

Those ever-efficient plotters can get rid of all the bullets and the
BRAIN of John Kennedy (but only AFTER that brain has been thoroughly
examined and sectioned by the autopsy doctors; which means its
disposal at that time is meaningless)....but these boobs can't get rid
of a few pieces of paper....e.g., the Katzenbach memo, or the "Q-
Number" stuff relating to CE399, or some "CIA document" with "Oswald"
on it, etc.

To the contrary, in fact...these plotters actually go the OTHER way
and CREATE MEMOS after the fact that can only get them into hot water
with conspiracy-adoring kooks -- like the Katz memo, for example (even
though that document has been totally skewed and misrepresented by the
Kook Faction since '63, but the CTers in question want to think it
"leads to conspiracy/cover-up").

Continue, kooks. I await your next self-implosion.

YoHarvey

unread,
Sep 24, 2007, 6:24:20 PM9/24/07
to

Healey moment ROFLMAO, ROFLMAO, ROFLMAO. We're actually lucky on this
site. Jesus's family has to tolerate his stupudity on a daily basis
roflmao, roflmao.

cdddraftsman

unread,
Sep 25, 2007, 12:41:16 AM9/25/07
to
On Sep 24, 2:10 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> www.amazon.com/Message-Patricia-Lambert-apology-Bugliosi/forum/Fx2TVH...

>
> >>> "Does it not strike you as the least bit strange that the agents are writing down six steps for creating a new paper trail and erasing the old one, and then SAVING IT?" <<<
>
> Indeed. Along these same hilarious "Why The Heck Did They Do It Like
> This?" lines, allow me to quote my new favorite LN source (VB, who
> else?)......
>
> "If we're to believe the theorists, it apparently never crossed the
> minds of the alleged conspirators who killed Kennedy to simply get rid
> of the evidence that could convict them. Unlike nearly all ordinary
> conspirators, Kennedy's killers intentionally and knowingly left
> evidence behind in the archives and the Warren Commission volumes that
> could expose them -- evidence that only the conspiracists are smart
> and industrious enough to uncover." -- VINCENT T. BUGLIOSI, ESQ.; Via
> Page #418 of the CD's endnotes in "RECLAIMING HISTORY" (c.2007)
>
> www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/showpost.php?p=3200860
>
OH REALLY David Von Pein ! How do you expect myths and fables to
prosper if you go "pickin and a pokin and pour cold water all over
their smokin" * ? No use getting excited anymore , the kookbuffers
have replaced strict historical accuracy with a politicised after
agenda to sooth their ruffeled feathers . Want proof ? Well
that may be a little hard to come by unless we can torture some of
them into admitting it .....but when's the last time you saw a bunch
of turkeys flying like eagles ? I haven't either :-( ..........tl

*My favorite Ali-ism next to the line " When I'm through with Joe
Frazier they'll have to donate his face to the bureau of wildlife
" :-)


cdddraftsman

unread,
Sep 25, 2007, 1:15:02 AM9/25/07
to
On Sep 24, 2:57 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> And who says that they didn't get rid of the evidence ?
>
> .38 auto shells that become .38 specials
>
> > Simple mistake admitted by the officer who was not told by
> > witnesses that LHO intentionally stopped and ejected shells
> > from his revolver . What possible excuse for such a lame Q ?
> > They were after a person who just shot a DP officer and it hardly
> > mattered at the time whether he had a auto or a revolver .

>
> A Mauser that becomes a Mannlicher-Carcano
>
> > I thought Robert Groden had the market cornered on that BIG
> > WHOPPER ? Turning a shotgun into a rifle :
> > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/experts.htm#2ndrifle

>
> A large exit wound in the back of the head that becomes a neat little
> entry wound
>
> > More Groden non-sense debunked years and years ago :
> > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/experts.htm#rotate
>
> cleaning of Gov.Connally's coat
>
> > They had just got done blowing JFK's brains all over Dealey Plaza
> > and *they* didn't want to leave JBC's coat in a messy condition :-)
>
> the disappearing brain
>
> > BTW ....Hows the search for yours comming along ?
> > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/brain.txt

>
> removing Kennedy's body from Dallas (Why didn't they offer to have Dr.
> Rose come to Washington to do the autopsy ?)
>
> > He wanted it done in Dallas . You know States rights top the Federal Laws
> > every time don't you ? As Texas found out to it's dismay when they ousted
> > Sam Houston and joined the Confederacy .......right ?
>
> hearings in secret
>
> > How did a big fat blabber mouthed idiot like you find out ,
> > if it was a secret ?
>
> gnoring witnesses
>
> > Is that like your snoring witnesses on your video's ?
>
> altering affidavits , forging documents ,autopsy x-rays and photographs that don't
> even match each other
>
> > You could say that about your logic also :
> > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bogus.htm

>
> finally, killing the suspect in front of 70 armed officers and
> effective silencing him forever.
>
> > Ya know what they say about the
> > best way to keep something a secret ......is to televise it in front of
> > 70 million people watching on TV ....right ?

>
> yeah, this case was really done above-board, idiot.
>
>
> > Gil really must of polished his weegee board last nght into the
> > wee willy wonker hours of the morning ! :-) .........tl


David Von Pein

unread,
Sep 26, 2007, 7:26:13 PM9/26/07
to
>>> "Odds are that no one knew there'd be a WC before the assassination." <<<

<Large Laugh Here>

Yeah, I guess those plotters who were creating incriminating
documents, etc., must have thought that the Government and/or the
State of Texas would simply throw their hands up in the air after the
murder of the President and say "Oh well! What can we do?! It's over
now!" -- i.e., no court trial at all (if Oswald had lived) and no
official inquiries to worry about either, either by the Govt. or by
local/state officials.


>>> "This is another case of VB using demagoguery instead of logic. VB is the PT Barnum of LNs." <<<

The irony abounds (again).

Remember my bladder! Please! You CTers KNOW it's weak...and yet you
continue to put me through this laughfest, day after day.

David Von Pein

unread,
Sep 27, 2007, 10:35:09 PM9/27/07
to

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/a36996e6005f352a

>>> "Sometimes the conspirators assume that the official documents have been destroyed, when accidentally some copies remain." <<<


Convenient dodge there.

So, it now appears that not only are the conspirators writing down
their evil deeds on paper -- but they are also MAKING EXTRA COPIES of
these sinister pro-conspiracy memos too!

The one original document ain't enough, huh? So the plotters decide to
make covering their asses much more difficult by COPYING their CT
handiwork many times over (so that crackerjack CT hunters like The
Marsh-ster can find them decades later).

Nice. (And stupid too.)

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Sep 29, 2007, 7:07:39 PM9/29/07
to
Tony Marsh Said:

>>> "And in fact when the conspirators are stupid enough to be writing this shit down for others to see which they should not be doing, they get a letter of reprimand and a guidance letter from their superior saying, "Do not use the word assassination in an official US document. Try to find a euphemism such as terminate or eliminate." " <<<

LOL. Yeah...who would EVER in a million years be able to link the
words "terminate" or "eliminate" with "assassination"???

(My bladder! Please....stop! Even if you're RIGHT about the above
"terminate" vs. "assassination" shit....please stop! Soon! Otherwise
my bladder will never have a hope of surviving the incoming onslaught!)

0 new messages