What a bunch af idiots
Lone
good LN Nuter, a good sparring partner...your nothing more than
peanuts.
David Von Pein
Answer this question:
Where are the CT-proving bullets? Where did they go? Who hid them?
I've been trying to pry that answer out of CTers for years.
Or did all of your non-LHO shooters miss the whole car? But no really
good CTer believes that...right? They've got to have that frontal head
shot.
BTW, buy a dictionary.
Lone
The Sterilisation of the crime scene immediately after the shooting
( and the Lincoln- Lima at Parkland) is well documented. I guess you
know what the word "sterilisation "related to a covert operation
means.
David Von Pein
Isn't it the contention of you kooks that TWO bullets went into
Kennedy but did not exit? What does the limousine outside in the
parking lot have to do with those bullets in the victims?
Were both victims "sterilized" by the covert act too? Including
survivor Connally?
Still waiting for an answer.....Where did the bullets go? Who hid
them?
Or would you rather just take wild guesses, like all good kooks do?
justm...@gmail.com
The word is "sterilization" if you can't afford a dictionary, use one
online. Or stick to words no longer then 5 letters :)
Exactly what proof do you have that there was anything found in the
limo to justify a hit from the front? You have nothing to support this
statement other then the fact that the limo was cleaned out after
arriving at Parkland. Your speculating that anything was found.
tomnln
You spelled Penis Wrong.
"Lone" <amsei...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182376821.6...@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
aeffects
wrote:
> On Jun 20, 6:46 pm, Lone <amseikci...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 21 Jun., 00:22, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > Here's a good place to start your sparring......
>
> > > Answer this question:
>
> > > Where are the CT-proving bullets? Where did they go? Who hid them?
> > > I've been trying to pry that answer out of CTers for years.
>
> > > Or did all of your non-LHO shooters miss the whole car? But no really
> > > good CTer believes that...right? They've got to have that frontal head
> > > shot.
>
> > > BTW, buy a dictionary.
>
> > The Sterilisation of the crime scene immediately after the shooting
> > ( and the Lincoln- Lima at Parkland) is well documented. I guess you
> > know what the word "sterilisation "related to a covert operation
> > means.
>
> The word is "sterilization" if you can't afford a dictionary, use one
> online. Or stick to words no longer then 5 letters :)
ijdit, where i come from it is spelled 2 ways, get your head outt'a
your ass...
> Exactly what proof do you have that there was anything found in the
> limo to justify a hit from the front? You have nothing to support this
> statement other then the fact that the limo was cleaned out after
> arriving at Parkland. Your speculating that anything was found.
this has got to be YoHarvey, yes?
tomnln
Look where they put the 4 fragments they took outta JBC's wrist.
Look where they put the Mauser.
Look where they put part 3 of the P O Box application.
There's MORE.
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1182378129.4...@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Washing it out at Parkland is Destruction of Evidence....A FELONY.
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182381176.7...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Do you know ANYONE who would Admit to being Yo(Momma)Harvey????
"aeffects" <aeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182397092.7...@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Bud
Lone wrote:
> On 21 Jun., 00:22, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> > Here's a good place to start your sparring......
> >
> > Answer this question:
> >
> > Where are the CT-proving bullets? Where did they go? Who hid them?
> > I've been trying to pry that answer out of CTers for years.
> >
> > Or did all of your non-LHO shooters miss the whole car? But no really
> > good CTer believes that...right? They've got to have that frontal head
> > shot.
> >
> > BTW, buy a dictionary.
>
> The Sterilisation of the crime scene immediately after the shooting
> ( and the Lincoln- Lima at Parkland) is well documented.
Yah, hundreds of minions scuttling hither and yon, like elves,
gathering up all the bullet bits from Dealy, the limo, the hospital,
ect. All quiet about their roles to this day.
> I guess you
> know what the word "sterilisation "related to a covert operation
> means.
It`s what should have been done to your parents.
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Healy are you jumping on the paranoia bandwagon too? Once again, I'm
not YoHarvey but I'd be very proud to admit to being him if I
was....he does one hell of a job pissing off you imbecils on a daily
basis.
BTW Rossely your stupid chat room wasn't open the other night when I
told you I would be in. What happened? Did you chicken out? Don't lie
and tell me that name was never banned because it was. For someone
that owns a chat room on pal you should know that when pal does their
weekly upgrades it cleans out the bans and bounces on the servers they
are working on and any rooms connected to those servers. Actually your
room hasn't been open at all. Got that tail tucked between your legs
again....beware of the felon supporters!
Justme
Gil Jesus
> Here's a good place to start your sparring......
>
> Answer this question:
>
> Where are the CT-proving bullets? Where did they go? Who hid them?
> I've been trying to pry that answer out of CTers for years.
The bullets were removed from the body before it got to Bethesda.
Why do you think the autopsists were confused about the nature of the
wounds, calling them "presumably of entry" and "presumably of exit" ?
Why was it that the description of the wounds was different at the
autopsy than in Dallas ? Why do you think the coffin and the wrapping
of the body was different at Bethesda from Parkland ? Why do you think
that the SS wouldn't let Earl Rose do the autopsy in Dallas, to the
extent of removing the body at gunpoint ?
And the "missile" that was given to the FBI by the SS, (and the SS got
a receipt for)where do you think the SS got it from ? It wasn't CE399.
What happened to that bullet ?
The altered wounds were a consequence of the search for bullets.
That's why the difference in the descriptions of the wounds. The SS
refused to let Dr. Rose do the autopsy in Dallas because no one was
going to open that coffin. It was empty. Kennedy's body left Parkland
in another casket. It left Dallas long before AF-1 took off. The only
place that the military could have removed the bullets before the
autopsy was the Walter Reed Army Hospital. That's where the SS came
into the possession of the "missile" that it gave to the FBI.
And where did that missile go ? Ask the FBI.
Gil Jesus
>
> - Show quoted text -
YES
justm...@gmail.com
Where's the proof Chico?? Let's see it in writing in an official
document. You have nothing proving any of the bs you just posted.
Let's see the proof!
Gil Jesus
> this (justme1952) has got to be YoHarvey, yes
YES
justm...@gmail.com
NO! Don't avoid the question like you did with YoHarvey
Chico...answer it!!!!! Where's the proof of your bs you
posted??????????????????
MSwanberg
wrote:
Um, are you saying that there might be a document somewhere that's
signed, dated, notarized, and laminated that lays out all of the
illegalities perpetrated on 11/22/63? Such a document doesn't exist,
and it's patently goofy to think that it might exist. And thus it is
just as goofy to demand the presentation of one to prove a point.
The truth is that the "evidence" points to LHO guilt... period. The
problem, however, is that it's contradictory and full of holes. CT
theories are supposition based on observation. There will never be
any hard evidence because those responsible would have destroyed it...
dur!
-Mike
aeffects
wrote:
> On Jun 21, 3:51 am, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Lone wrote:
> > > On 21 Jun., 00:22, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > Here's a good place to start your sparring......
>
> > > > Answer this question:
>
> > > > Where are the CT-proving bullets? Where did they go? Who hid them?
> > > > I've been trying to pry that answer out of CTers for years.
>
> > > > Or did all of your non-LHO shooters miss the whole car? But no really
> > > > good CTer believes that...right? They've got to have that frontal head
> > > > shot.
>
> > > > BTW, buy a dictionary.
>
> > > The Sterilisation of the crime scene immediately after the shooting
> > > ( and the Lincoln- Lima at Parkland) is well documented.
>
> > Yah, hundreds of minions scuttling hither and yon, like elves,
> > gathering up all the bullet bits from Dealy, the limo, the hospital,
> > ect. All quiet about their roles to this day.
>
> > > I guess you
> > > know what the word "sterilisation "related to a covert operation
> > > means.
>
> > It`s what should have been done to your parents.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Healy are you jumping on the paranoia bandwagon too?
paranoid about who? YOU? LMFAO!
Once again, I'm
> not YoHarvey but I'd be very proud to admit to being him if I
> was....he does one hell of a job pissing off you imbecils on a daily
> basis.
yeah, sure you would... imbecils (sic) such as yourself don't piss
anyone off ... you post without a clue concerning JFK's assassination,
including the related evidence. (kinda like a summer school student
looking for extra credit, you dig?)
When you grow up, you can even post like Fast Eddy, what-a-goal. So,
show us your latent talent, answer a few of the 45 questions, or
(gasp) all of them. If not, its perfectly fine for you to maintain
Nutter *knob polishing* status, there's about 8 of your ilk around
here, and it sure makes for a good show...
<snip unrelated nonsense>
> Justme
Jmoor...@aol.com
What "proof" would you like him to post ? Perhaps a government
document admitting "we destroyed/substituted evidence" would suffice ?
Sworn affidavits revealing that the President's body was taken to WRAH
to remove the bullets to hide the fact that Kennedy was killed from
the front ?
Could you possibly be that naive to believe that the killers would
leave documentation proving that they tampered with the evidence ? Or
perhaps that one of them would come forward and admit to being an
accessory to murder ?
C'mon now.
Gil Jesus
Typical YoLarvae post. Don't answer the questions, just insult. This
he/she moron thinks there's an "official document" that will admit to
a crime (murder) that has no statute of limitations and is punishable
by death.
His/her stand: ignore the witness who were there. They're all wrong.
The only ones who got it right were the ones who were NOT there.
This one's a real piece of work.
aeffects
> On Jun 21, 6:36 am, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 21, 6:32 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 20, 11:38 pm, aeffects <aeffe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > this (justme1952) has got to be YoHarvey, yes
>
> > > YES
>
> > NO! Don't avoid the question like you did with YoHarvey
> > Chico...answer it!!!!! Where's the proof of your bs you
> > posted??????????????????
>
> Um, are you saying that there might be a document somewhere that's
> signed, dated, notarized, and laminated that lays out all of the
> illegalities perpetrated on 11/22/63? Such a document doesn't exist,
> and it's patently goofy to think that it might exist. And thus it is
> just as goofy to demand the presentation of one to prove a point.
wait till you see the Nutter's in action, portion of the WCR report/
findings is most difficult to defend....
> The truth is that the "evidence" points to LHO guilt... period.
"points to" period? Bullshit, period! There was NO trial, or did you
forget that little item.....perhaps you've spent to much time watching
the daBuglios-Spence video courtroom dance?
The
> problem, however, is that it's contradictory and full of holes. CT
> theories are supposition based on observation.
you might add: simple, logical deduction
There will never be
> any hard evidence because those responsible would have destroyed it...
> dur!
we need nothing else other than the films of Dealey Plaza, the Moorman
photo, WCR , exhibits, volumes AND omissions -- seeya in court
counselor!
> -Mike
tomnln
1. Make sure you can forward PROOF of your claims.
2. Make sure you answer my questions.
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182420424.1...@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Look where they put the 4 fragments they took outta JBC's wrist.
Look where they put the Mauser.
Look where they put part 3 of the P O Box application.
There's MORE.
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1182421487....@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Look where they put the 4 fragments they took outta JBC's wrist.
Look where they put the Mauser.
Look where they put part 3 of the P O Box application.
There's MORE.
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182421678.6...@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Look where they put the 4 fragments they took outta JBC's wrist.
Look where they put the Mauser.
Look where they put part 3 of the P O Box application.
There's MORE.
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1182444097.8...@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Look where they put the 4 fragments they took outta JBC's wrist.
Look where they put the Mauser.
Look where they put part 3 of the P O Box application.
There's MORE.
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1182421569.3...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Look where they put the 4 fragments they took outta JBC's wrist.
Look where they put the Mauser.
Look where they put part 3 of the P O Box application.
There's MORE.
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182422183....@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Look where they put the 4 fragments they took outta JBC's wrist.
Look where they put the Mauser.
Look where they put part 3 of the P O Box application.
There's MORE.
<Jmoor...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1182443747....@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
David Von Pein
Why of course. Naturally. Easy as pie, right? Just have some plotters
go in and dig them out of the bodies, right? (Without a single non-
plotter noticing.)
Brilliant.
Next hunk of unsupported idiocy please.....
>>> "Why do you think the autopsists were confused about the nature of the wounds...?" <<<
Because they were not aware of the bullet hole in the throat, idiot.
That's why. And everybody knows it.
There was no "confusion" about ANY of the other three wounds. It was
obvious to all 3 doctors at Bethesda that the hole in the back of the
head was an entry wound (via the bevelling on the skull), with an
associated large, gaping exit wound on the right-front-top portion of
the head.
And the doctors all knew the small wound in JFK's upper back was an
entry wound. The only mystery was: Where did that back bullet go?
When Humes talked to Perry at about 10 AM on Nov. 23, the mystery
cleared up completely.
Why the CTers of the world cannot accept this wholly-reasonable
explanation of events at Bethesda is a much bigger mystery than any
crazy plot scenario put on the table to date by the CT-Kooks.
>>> "Why do you think the coffin and the wrapping of the body was different at Bethesda from Parkland?" <<<
They weren't. That's your imagination taking hold.
As far as I'm aware, the ONLY person who tried to peddle that double-
bill of nonsense was Paul O'Connor. Of course, O'Connor had two more
tales to tell too....one of which not a single other person backs up:
i.e., the "missing brain". Great witness there indeed.
But keep on pushing this twin fairy tale, Gil. After all, a new day
has dawned; and with each new sunrise, all proven-wrong crap peddled
by many conspiracy-loving kooks becomes new and fresh and true once
more.
>>> "Why do you think that the SS wouldn't let Earl Rose do the autopsy in Dallas, to the extent of removing the body at gunpoint?" <<<
The SS had nothing to do with the FINAL decision. It was Ken
O'Donnell's decision (plus Larry O'Brien's too). Both were close aides
to JFK, they weren't SS.
Why don't you now blame those very close friends of Kennedy (O'Donnell/
O'Brien) for being in on a "plot".
>>> "And the "missile" that was given to the FBI by the SS, (and the SS got a receipt for) where do you think the SS got it from?" <<<
There was no "missile", kook. It was called a "missile" by mistake. It
was really only two small "fragments" from JFK's head. But, naturally,
once the mistaken word "missile" was revealed to the CT-Kooks of the
world, there's NO TAKING IT BACK, regardless of how many times it has
been taken back.
(See my RH review for details.)
>>> "The altered wounds were a consequence of the search for bullets." <<<
Great patsy plot those guys had there, huh? --- Let's see what that
PRE-arranged plan must have entailed:
Shoot the President (and maybe others too who get in the way?) with
SEVERAL different guns, and then just hope that everything can be
smoothed over after the dust settles in DP so that our one Patsy in
the book store can be blamed by himself.
Brilliant (if the plotters were total morons, that is).
>>> "The SS refused to let Dr. Rose do the autopsy in Dallas because no one was going to open that coffin." <<<
You're getting kookier by the minute. (Not your fault, though...it's
engrained. You've been trained well by other veteran CTers. Good boy.)
Of course, as mentioned, the SS (ultimately) had LITTLE to do with the
final decision to remove JFK from Dallas. It was decided by non-SS
people. But keep on thinking otherwise. It'll help your dream-like
fantasies.
Next.....
>>> "{The coffin} was empty. Kennedy's body left Parkland in another casket." <<<
And yet not a single person noticed TWO caskets in the Parkland ER.
(Hmmm, they must've just forgotten about the second {extra} coffin,
huh? Perhaps they thought JFK would be removed from the hospital in
sections or something. The Parkland staff was pretty young and
gullible, huh?)
BTW, you'd better go tell David Lifton of your theory re. the caskets.
He'll probably want to revise his own unsupportable fairy tale once he
hears your bombshell.
Next piece of fantasy please.....
>>> "It left Dallas long before AF-1 took off." <<<
And you've got pictures of the plane taking off, right, Mr. Kook? (Was
the airline that whisked JFK away called "Covert Plot Airways"? And
let me guess who was in the cockpit flying the mystery airplane --
Dave Ferrie?)
Next hunk of kookiness.....
>>> "The only place that the military could have removed the bullets before the autopsy was the Walter Reed Army Hospital." <<<
If I ever want to get embroiled in a cover-up involving military
hospitals and personnel, I'm going to call Walter Reed
first...definitely! Because those guys are made of steel! Not a WORD
from any of that covert surgery team in 43+ years! They are rocks!
~swoons~
>>> "Ask the FBI." <<<
Why should I ask them? I'd much rather ask a kook like you...since you
are the one who seems to think bullets are missing. The FBI knows that
no bullets THAT ENTERED VICTIMS are missing.
~cough~
tomnln
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Qnmei.216718$NU1.1...@newsfe13.lga...
> Lone;
tomnln
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Sumei.216720$NU1.1...@newsfe13.lga...
RicBi...@aol.com
On Jun 20, 5:22 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> Answer this question:
>
> Where are the CT-proving bullets? Where did they go? Who hid them?
> I've been trying to pry that answer out of CTers for years.
Answer these questions:
Where is the bullet that proved Oswald missed the limo completely with
his first shot, which in turn would prove he was the only shooter? (I
assume you believe Buglioisi's theory of the shooting sequence and
results.) Where did it go? Who hid it? I've been trying to pry that
answer out of LNers for years. ;-)
> Or did all of your non-LHO shooters miss the whole car?
Did LHO miss the whole car with his first shot? When the car was
*closest* to him? Just how good of a shot was he, anyway? ;-) It
never ceases to amaze me that anti-conspiracy theorists can't produce
all the bullets themselves, and then insist conspiracy theorists do
what they themselves cannot.
- /< /\ /> -
RicBi...@aol.com
On Jun 20, 6:10 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> That's funny. I thought the bullets probably WENT INTO THE VICTIMS.
Including the first shot? Bugliosi disagrees with you. Sorry, I know
that probably ruins your whole day.
> Isn't it the contention of you kooks that TWO bullets went into
> Kennedy but did not exit?
Not this "kook". That's one of your (and Bugliosi's) problems, David,
you seem to think (or pretend to think) that all conspiracy theorists
have the same theory of the crime. I know you have been on this
newsgroup long enough to know that's not true. Why pretend it is?
> Were both victims "sterilized" by the covert act too? Including
> survivor Connally?
"Survivor Conally" insisted until the day he died that he and JFK were
hit by separate bullets. And guess what? He was there.
> Still waiting for an answer.....Where did the bullets go? Who hid
> them?
Still waiting for an answer... Where did the first bullet go? Who
hid it?
> Or would you rather just take wild guesses, like all good kooks do?
Or would you rather just take a wild guess, like Bugliosis did? ;-)
David Von Pein
Vince doesn't disagree with me. He knows, as any sensible person
would, that it's far more likely for a stray bullet to be
unrecoverable than it is for two (or 3? or 4?) different missiles that
CTers say went into people to remain unrecovered after the shooting.
(You aren't truly serious with your inane questions regarding the
unrecovered missed-shot LN bullet...are you?)
>>> "That's one of your (and Bugliosi's) problems, David, you seem to think (or pretend to think) that all conspiracy theorists have the same theory of the crime. I know you have been on this newsgroup long enough to know that's not true. Why pretend it is?" <<<
VB and I have a lot in common....and "CTer Lumping" is one of those
things. And, as I've admitted to this aggregation several times in the
past, that kind of CT Lumping is NOT a good habit to get into. I fully
admit that.
But when you're dealing with an array of "Anybody But Oswald" kooks
here in the insane asylum on a regular basis (e.g., Walt, Donald, Ben,
Tom-Sack, etc.), it's kinda difficult to not engage in "lumping".
Plus, I've always enjoyed watching Lumpy Rutherford on TV too. So, go
blame him for my bad habit. I do. ;)
>>> ""Survivor Conally" [sic] insisted until the day he died that he and JFK were hit by separate bullets. And guess what? He was there." <<<
He was there, sure. But what did he SEE with his OWN EYES re. the SBT
timeline? Answer (per his own words): Nothing. He never saw JFK during
the SBT time in question.
Plus: If you think Connally always denied the POSSIBILITY of the SBT,
you'd better think again. Have a look:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/741a872f58796bfe
>>> "Still waiting for an answer...Where did the first bullet go? Who hid it?" <<<
See last post.
(Or: Go ask James Thomas Tague. He was hit by it. Maybe he pocketed
it. But I doubt it...because he's a Hoosier too. And they ain't
crooks.) ;)
>>> "Or would you rather just take a wild guess, like Bugliosi did?" <<<
Night and day difference again. Somehow you can't see it. Maybe if
those blinders could be shed. That might help.
lazu...@webtv.net
back wound was moved 4 inches up to the neck( first day evidence t-3
none of that t-1 horseshit) and moving a supposed eop wound 4 inches up
to the cowlick-3 doctors all making the exact same mistake, not once,
but twice in the most important murder of the 20th century? Where the
hell is it lone nutters? No one ever heard of a neurospasm,or magic
bullet since or before so with all due politeness shut the fuckin' hell
up with that lone nut nonsense...Jeff
Gil Jesus
No you can see why. A Real troll.
Bud
tomnln wrote:
> It's RARE that the room ain't open.
It was closed for renovations. It was having rubber walls
installed.
Gil Jesus
> you are: Lowry, van Pein, EdCage, Chuck Schuyler...I amlooking for a
> good LN Nuter, a good sparring partner...your nothing more than
> peanuts.
Looks like the starting lineup for the state hospital basketball team.
Since this is a conspiracy newsgroup, they and their opinions are
irrelevent here. Ignore these trolls, they have nothing, really.
They're here to disrupt and insult, nothing more. The evidence is in
their posts. Do a search in the newsgroup on their screenname and see
what kind of posts they make. The best they can do is to cut-and-paste
or refer to the website of someone else. Von Pinhead still doesn't get
that the witness of TWO is a true witness, he still insists on
referring to himself as a source. Lowry posts foolishness. They're BIG
zeroes as individuals and as a group.
These are sick individuals who crave attention. What other type of
person would go someplace where he/she doesn't belong ? To rile up the
regulars and get some attention.
My feeling is that the best thing we can do is to ignore this bunch of
idiots completely.
tomnln
YOU never had the guts to visit my chat room.
"Bud" <sirs...@fast.net> wrote in message
news:1182514775.2...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
"Presumably" they're here looking for BIG Bedingers.
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1182524767....@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Bud
tomnln wrote:
> You'll never know.
>
> YOU never had the guts to visit my chat room.
I was there. Twice. Once you weren`t there, and the second time you
told me I needed a microphone to paticipate (which I don`t have). I
clearly remember your voice croaking "Is this Bud from the newsgroup"
from my speakers. It still gives me chills, it was the only seance
I`ve ever attemded where someone picked up on the other end.
tomnln
I never knew that your Guilt ran that deep.Use some of those 30 pieces of
silver to
buy a mic for about $5. at radio shack.
THEN, you'll be able to address evidence/testimony.
"Bud" <sirs...@fast.net> wrote in message
news:1182540156.4...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Bud
tomnln wrote:
> Funny that you never identified yourself.
I... didn`t... have... a... microphone.
> I never knew that your Guilt ran that deep.Use some of those 30 pieces of
> silver to
> buy a mic for about $5. at radio shack.
You can buy an Irish person at Radio Shack?
> THEN, you'll be able to address evidence/testimony.
Lets see, I should spend money to hold a conversation with a
moron. There must be an up-side to this that I`m missing.
> "Bud" <sirs...@fast.net> wrote in message
> news:1182540156.4...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > tomnln wrote:
> >> You'll never know.
> >>
> >> YOU never had the guts to visit my chat room.
> >
> > I was there. Twice. Once you weren`t there, and the second time you
> > told me I needed a microphone to paticipate (which I don`t have). I
> > clearly remember your voice croaking "Is this Bud from the newsgroup?"
> > from my speakers. It still gives me chills, it was the only seance
> > I`ve ever attended where someone picked up on the other end.
justm...@gmail.com
> tomnln wrote:
> > Funny that you never identified yourself.
>
> I... didn`t... have... a... microphone.
>
> > I never knew that your Guilt ran that deep.Use some of those 30 pieces of
> > silver to
> > buy a mic for about $5. at radio shack.
>
> You can buy an Irish person at Radio Shack?
>
> > THEN, you'll be able to address evidence/testimony.
>
> Lets see, I should spend money to hold a conversation with a
> moron. There must be an up-side to this that I`m missing.
>
>
>
> >news:1182540156.4...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > tomnln wrote:
> > >> You'll never know.
>
> > >> YOU never had the guts to visit my chat room.
>
> > > I was there. Twice. Once you weren`t there, and the second time you
> > > told me I needed a microphone to paticipate (which I don`t have). I
> > > clearly remember your voice croaking "Is this Bud from the newsgroup?"
> > > from my speakers. It still gives me chills, it was the only seance
> > > I`ve ever attended where someone picked up on the other end.
>
> > >>news:1182514775.2...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >> > tomnln wrote:
> > >> >> It's RARE that the room ain't open.
>
> > >> > It was closed for renovations. It was having rubber walls
> > >> > installed.
>
> > >> >> 1. Make sure you can forward PROOF of your claims.
> > >> >> 2. Make sure you answer my questions.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Lets see, I should spend money to hold a conversation with a
moron. There must be an up-side to this that I`m missing.
Bud...that has to be the best comment yet to the senile old man
Rossely!
Gil Jesus
>
> Lets see, I should spend money to hold a conversation with a
> moron. There must be an up-side to this that I`m missing.
There is: you can look in a mirror and hold a conversation wth a moron
for free.
justm...@gmail.com
No one asked you how you spend your time....I imagine you have a great
conversation with yourself too....must be expensive replacing all
those mirrors you break though.