Re: Need a Usenet computer guru opinion please
Jeffrey Bloss
> On Nov 11, 3:33 pm, Dave Doe <h...@work.ok> wrote:
>> In article <15cf22c4-fcbb-4ddc-9c1b-
>> ffed83af8...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, dhenriq...@rcn.com says...
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 10, 8:16 pm, Dave Doe <h...@work.ok> wrote:
>>> > In article <41618695-f7c4-4394-85fd-
>>> > bb40ffa24...@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, dhenriq...@rcn.com says...
>>
>>> > > On Nov 10, 2:31 pm, Jim Logajan <Jam...@Lugoj.com> wrote:
>>> > > > Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@rcn.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > Thanks Jim. I'm considering at this point just how far I want to go
>>> > > > > with this. I have considerable resources but so far no harm has been
>>> > > > > done other than aggravation. I have some fairly heavy police and legal
>>> > > > > resources available overseas in both the UK and Switzerland that have
>>> > > > > been made aware of what's happening. I've given them what data I
>>> > > > > have.
>>
>>> > > > I see the idiot has shifted to forging posts via a Chinese service, but
>>> > > > probably doesn't realize (or care) that he's already left trails to him
>>> > > > elsewhere. In fact the more service providers he uses, the easier it gets
>>> > > > to nail him.
>>
>>> > > > > As I say, nothing so far but harmless troll behavior but I'm keeping a
>>> > > > > close eye on it to see if it expands.
>>
>>> > > > Trolling literally doesn't pay so I don't understand why anyone bothers.
>>> > > > And why play with libel only for spite? Fundamentally irrational.
>>
>>> > > What I'll never understand is what causes an individual to form such
>>> > > an utter hatred for another based on what happens on Usenet. The
>>> > > forgeries and replies are so filled with vitriol and personal attack
>>> > > one has to wonder about the emotional stability involved. I would LOVE
>>> > > to have the opportunity to go head to head with this character and
>>> > > have him/her state in public and for his peers to see, EXACTLY what it
>>> > > is that has caused these cogent personal attacks. Not the expected,
>>> > > "because you're an idiot" or "because you think your crap stinks
>>> > > better than everybody else's" type of reply either. THAT kind of reply
>>> > > says absolutely nothing but that the person posting such replies
>>> > > doesn't like someone else.
>>> > > No, I would want a REASON...............and EXACT REASON.
>>> > > What's interesting about that is that the troll really doesn't have a
>>> > > reason that would be reasonable to a general audience.
>>> > > I probably yanked his chain somewhere back in the stone age and he
>>> > > harbors some deep resentment.
>>> > > Of course there IS always the chance that this character gets his
>>> > > kicks out of trying to get someone to go off on him, hence a classic
>>> > > troll rather than one of the above mentioned.
>>> > > Anyway, it's a shame that someone with the smarts to go to that much
>>> > > trouble to aggravate someone couldn't channel those efforts into
>>> > > useful dialog with people.
>>> > > As it happens, this same troll has taken on other people here as well,
>>> > > so I don't really feel "special" :-))
>>> > > Dudley Henriques
>>
>>> > Well what I don't get - is why you simply don't just ignore him/her?
>>
>>> > This is what these sort of folk *do* - and this person is suceeding in
>>> > baiting you to the extent that you have made this post (amoung others).
>>
>>> > In short, surely if you just ignore them, bozo bin them - they'll
>>> > realise you are no fun to 'play' with - and go away.
>>
>>> > Well that's my theory, and I'm stickin' with it! :)
>>
>>> > --
>>> > Duncan.
>>
>>> Ignoring a troll who posts under you using their own name or a
>>> pseudonym can be ignored. Ignoring someone who posts using your name
>>> and identity
>>> is quite another thing.
>>> Dudley Henriques
>>
>> Looking at the headers (I only have a few posts to go by - my reader
>> crapped out bigtime when I moved it to a new drive)...
>>
>> you: post on a MAC, use google groups
>> them: post on hispeed.ch (complaints to ab...@hispeed.ch)
>>
>> I assume you've done the obvious (admittedly not likely to have much
>> luck on a .ch site! :(
>>
> Another thing that he could do is invoke the (whatever it is wherever
> you are) telecommunications Act.
> Its against the law to spread false/malicious material through a
> Telecommunications system
> And those boys can find the perp and prosecute them big time..
George, good idea!
or
You're full of more shit than a retard's diaper.
The latter.
--
_?_ Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
(@ @) Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
-oOO-(_)--OOo-------------------------------[ Groucho Marx ]--
grok! Devoted Microsoft User
Jeffrey Bloss
> Dudley Henriques <dhenr...@rcn.com> wrote:
>> What's interesting about that is that the troll really doesn't have a
>> reason that would be reasonable to a general audience.
>
> Some people strap on bombs, walk into crowds of innocent people, and blow
> themselves and others into eternal oblivion. Others walk into crowds and
> shoot everyone in sight until they themselves are brought down. None of
> them have reasons for their actions that general audiences would find
> reasonable.
>
> Trolls and suicide bombers are worlds apart in many important ways, but I
> think they at least share in common an over-arching ego-centrism.
I wear Vasque Sundowners most of the time. Look them up. You couldn't
afford them along side your our taxpayer funded video games because
even so called enlightened societal structures know useless assholes
like you don't deserve that standard of living. Fact is, you own no
such thing for two reasons. You're a bloodsucker who doesn't rate
them of course, and you don't spend enough time standing upright to
warrant owning shoes in the first place.
It's obvious someone struck a nerve, you actually do realize how much
alike you and Henriques are, and you're lying your ass off trying to
win back a bit of the dignity you never had.
Sorry it didn't work out. ;)
Jeffrey Bloss
> So just so someone on the forum knows exactly what I've done, my
> compuer's clock is showing 9:19PM EST. Figuring in a few minutes to
> finish this, I think I'll stand down from RAP until further notice as
> of 9:25EST. No post bearing my name after this time will be
> legitimate.
There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly horrible
it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip their heads
off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand sweet innocent
horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'.
YouοΏ½re the latter.
My bet is you can't go a week without seeing your name with
international exposure like Usenet. It's all you have left after a life
that's nearly over and all glory past.
You're about as tough to figure out as the wheel there slick, and not
anywhere near as useful or esthetically pleasing. :)
Jeffrey Bloss
> Just seen this stuff from a x-post. The server you refer to below
> <hispeed.ch> is NOT in China. It's a Swiss newsserver.
>
> (China = CN, Swiss = CH).
>
> HTH
Correcto, h, CN = ChiNk, CH = CHeese. lol
Jeffrey Bloss
> Just seen this stuff from a x-post. The server you refer to below
> <hispeed.ch> is NOT in China. It's a Swiss newsserver.
>
> (China = CN, Swiss = CH).
>
> HTH
Correcto, h, CN = ChiNk, CH = CHeese. lol
Jeffrey Bloss
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
> ...
>> I have some fairly heavy police and legal
>> resources available overseas in both the UK and Switzerland that have
>> been made aware of what's happening.
>
> Obviously you don't understand that bragging like this is exactly what
> makes you a rewarding target. You take yourself way too seriously.
>
> BTW, replying to huge posts without even bothering to sensibly trim the
> quotes is considered spam by many people, too.
His ego is nearly as large as Jupiter...if only Dudley's brain was.
Franklin
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:08:08 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:
>
>> Dudley Henriques <dhenr...@rcn.com> wrote:
>>> What's interesting about that is that the troll really doesn't have
>>> a reason that would be reasonable to a general audience.
>>
>> Some people strap on bombs, walk into crowds of innocent people, and
>> blow themselves and others into eternal oblivion. Others walk into
>> crowds and shoot everyone in sight until they themselves are brought
>> down. None of them have reasons for their actions that general
>> audiences would find reasonable.
>>
>> Trolls and suicide bombers are worlds apart in many important ways,
>> but I think they at least share in common an over-arching
>> ego-centrism.
>
> I wear Vasque Sundowners most of the time. Look them up. You couldn't
> afford them along side your our taxpayer funded video games because
> even so called enlightened societal structures know useless assholes
> like you don't deserve that standard of living. Fact is, you own no
> such thing for two reasons. You're a bloodsucker who doesn't rate
> them of course, and you don't spend enough time standing upright to
> warrant owning shoes in the first place.
>
> It's obvious someone struck a nerve, you actually do realize how much
> alike you and Henriques are, and you're lying your ass off trying to
> win back a bit of the dignity you never had.
>
> Sorry it didn't work out. ;)
Hello Jeffery, are you sure you didn't get fooled into buying fake
Vasque Sundowners? You're a bit prone to getting fooled. You wouldn't
know an MTM wrist watch if it hit you in the face despite your claims to
recognize one. Do you remember you posted this under the name David W.
<http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/86855d141fcc78e1>
It wasn't an MTM in the photo. It was a Porsche Orfina L5100.
MTMs have too many awkward gadgets for field use (such as remote
charging and tritium lume hands). You seem to love MTMs so much you
were posting to A.C.F. about them when you were calling yourself Krazee
Brenda: "I didn't buy this MTM on my wrist at K-Mart". LOL
<http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/62494d7079f87d63>
--
Small sample of Bear Bottoms's socks:
Jeffrey Bloss, Maxwell, David W, Ari, etc
Jeffrey Bloss
> 'Franklin' wrote thus:
>
>>MTMs have too many awkward gadgets for field use (such as remote
>>charging and tritium lume hands). You seem to love MTMs so much you
>>were posting to A.C.F. about them when you were calling yourself Krazee
>>Brenda: "I didn't buy this MTM on my wrist at K-Mart". LOL
>>
>><http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/62494d7079f87d63>
>
> That's a link to a post of yours dated Mar/2008, Franklin, wherein
> MTMs are not even mentioned. Duh!
>
> Is that the only way you can get other people to read your drivel
> ...post links to them, claiming they were posted by others in the
> hope that people will click the link and read what you wrote 18
> months later?
>
> LOL.
WTF is he pschyo/freaking out about now? Is this leftover shame from
having Silversteinn convince him that Ari is Frank Camper?
lol
Jeffrey Bloss
> 'Jeffrey Bloss' wrote thus:
>
>>On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:33:06 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>
>>> 'Franklin' wrote thus:
>>>
>>>>MTMs have too many awkward gadgets for field use (such as remote
>>>>charging and tritium lume hands). You seem to love MTMs so much you
>>>>were posting to A.C.F. about them when you were calling yourself Krazee
>>>>Brenda: "I didn't buy this MTM on my wrist at K-Mart". LOL
>>>>
>>>><http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/62494d7079f87d63>
>>>
>>> That's a link to a post of yours dated Mar/2008, Franklin, wherein
>>> MTMs are not even mentioned. Duh!
>>>
>>> Is that the only way you can get other people to read your drivel
>>> ...post links to them, claiming they were posted by others in the
>>> hope that people will click the link and read what you wrote 18
>>> months later?
>>>
>>> LOL.
>>
>>WTF is he pschyo/freaking out about now? Is this leftover shame from
>>having Silversteinn convince him that Ari is Frank Camper?
>>
>>lol
>
> Possibly.
> Franklin never forgives anyone who has made a fool of him.
He must hate himself then because *no one* does a better job of making
himself out the fool than Franklin all by his lonesome.
Jeffrey Bloss
> Or maybe he actually believes all the fantasies he constructs
> and anybody who disagrees with him is then seen as attacking his
> beliefs. A lot of people don't like that. It's a theory..... :-)
Could be, Franklin can't tell the difference between Usenet and real
life. They are one in the same to him.
hummingbird
Real life. What's that?
--
·ACF.FAQ download: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-d375213f.html
·ACF.FAQ view: http://alt-comp-freeware-FAQ.notlong.com
·Freeware resources: http://bearware.info
·ACF <zero tolerance> policy: http://zer0tolerance.notlong.com
·$Pricelessware $Racket: http://qdeo.com/td5 (courtesy whistleblower)
"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
(Arthur Schopenhauer)
hummingbird
> John Stubbings forging as: 'hummingbird' wrote thus:
>
> >On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:20:58 -0500, Jeffrey Bloss wrote :
> >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:04:45 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
> >>
>> > 'Jeffrey Bloss' wrote thus:
>> >
>> >>On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:41:26 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>> >>
>> >>He must hate himself then because *no one* does a better job
>> >>of making himself out the fool than Franklin all by his
>> >>lonesome.
>> >
>> > Or maybe he actually believes all the fantasies he constructs
>> > and anybody who disagrees with him is then seen as attacking
>> > his beliefs. A lot of people don't like that. It's a theory
>> > ..... :-)
>>
>> Could be, Franklin can't tell the difference between Usenet
>> and real life. They are one in the same to him.
>
>Real life. What's that?
>
> and mass sockpuppeting.
Don't reply to Stubbings. Reply to me.
First wipe the shit off your face.
Keyser S�ze
1.0.0.127 says...
> >Real life. What's that?
> >
> > You wouldn't know Stubbins, you spend your miserable life forging
> > and mass sockpuppeting.
>
> Don't reply to Stubbings. Reply to me.
>
> First wipe the shit off your face.
>
Mweh, what a waste of skin, I think he sees Stubbings in his dreams.
I'm sure stubbo won't want to hold that thought. LOL.
--
The usual suspect
hummingb�rd the fascist dictator
hummingbï¿œr...@127.0.0.1 says...
> >Real life. What's that?
Please wipe the shit off your face hummingbird, and you might glimpse
it.
--
hb
Guillaume Le Stubb
> I'm sure stubbo won't want to hold that thought. LOL.
You're not wrong. Even if I say so myself. LOL.
--
Pooh la chat
hummingbird
wrote :
> In article <1967f85352debfa9...@aracari.127.0.0.1>,
> hummingbír...@127.0.0.1 says...
>
> > >Real life. What's that?
>
>
> Please wipe the shit off your face hummingbird, and you might glimpse
> it.
There's no point because I get more shit on my face after 10 minutes.
Franklin
> 'Franklin' wrote thus:
>
>>MTMs have too many awkward gadgets for field use (such as remote
>>charging and tritium lume hands). You seem to love MTMs so much you
>>were posting to A.C.F. about them when you were calling yourself Krazee
>>Brenda: "I didn't buy this MTM on my wrist at K-Mart". LOL
>>
>><http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/62494d7079f87d63>
>
> That's a link to a post of yours dated Mar/2008, Franklin, wherein
> MTMs are not even mentioned. Duh!
>
> Is that the only way you can get other people to read your drivel
> ...post links to them, claiming they were posted by others in the
> hope that people will click the link and read what you wrote 18
> months later?
Immediately before my reply Krazee Brenda says:
"I didn't buy this MTM on my wrist at K-Mart"
Brenda dear, do you want to bet? LOL