Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.atheism
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Proving Creation: Genome Poves Intelligent Design
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
SkyEyes  
View profile  
 More options Nov 11 2012, 2:33 am
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, talk.atheism, alt.talk.creationism
From: SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2012 2:33 am
Subject: Re: Proving Creation: Genome Poves Intelligent Design
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Nov 10, 8:30 pm, Ralph <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 11/10/2012 7:44 PM, Andrew wrote:

> > "Ralph" wrote in messagenews:BtadnYWo1-2XMgDNnZ2dnUVZ5tWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
> >>   Andrew wrote:
> >>> "Smiler" wrote:
> >>>>    Andrew wrote:
> >>>>> "Budikka666" wrote:
> >>>>>>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/06/deciphe...

> >>>>>> Junk DNA:

> >>>>>>    "Protein-coding genes make up just 1.5 percent of our
> >>>>>>    genome. The rest includes a lot of what is thought to be
> >>>>>>    useless junk with no discernible function."
> >>>>> No,  the so called "Junk DNA" has *now been decoded*.
> >>>>>                          http://www.p2l.it/1fs

> >>>>> "They have determined that junk DNA is actually used to regulate gene
> >>>>> expression. Or, junk DNA is really on-off switches for protein encoding
> >>>>> DNA. ENCODE project results were published by Nature,  Scientific
> >>>>> American, New York Times and others."    http://www.p2l.it/1fs

> >>>>> So the truth is out, that our Creator did not make "junk" when He created
> >>>>> the DNA for all living things..after all.
> >>>> Your evidence for this is, what, exactly?
> >>> Here -->  http://www.p2l.it/1fs

> >>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence.
> >>> If you want the truth, then renounce the falsehood about
> >>> the supposedly junk DNA. The truth is, that our Creator
> >>> did not make "junk" when He created the DNA required
> >>> for life in all things, plant or animal.
> >> Do you ever read what you post?? Read the.. article and
> >> you will see that there is still questionable DNA.
> > Yes, there are still some things you don't understand.
> > But there is enough to know that DNA is evidence of
> > a creation by a Creator. That is the important thing to
> > understand, Ralph.

> If that is what you brought away from the actual article, I think I see
> your problem.
> There are fence posts with more intellect than you have.

Fence posts?  At least they, being made of wood, were once alive.  I
have decorative *rocks* in my front yard that are smarter than Andrew.

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google