The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
 There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic. There was an error processing your request. Please try again. Standard view   View as tree
 Messages 1 - 25 of 490 Newer >

From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Subject:
 Validation: For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon.

More options Mar 30 2012, 4:53 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 4:53 am
Subject: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
Look at it this way. Let's suppose a rocket is floating... incorrect,
since things cannot "float" in space. Okay, let's say a rocket is
stationary in space. Nothing is acting on this rocket. It's weight is
null because it is in a vacuum. It has no resistance to anything. When
you stand and push something, you have all sorts of Resistances acting
on you and the object you push. Friction of your feet on the floor,
wind, weight, gravity. In space, none of these things exist. The
rocket cannot exert energy because there simply is nothing to exert it
against.

Now, this rocket starts spewing gas out its rear end. Why would that
gas propel it? The gas itself does not have more mass than the rocket
itself. The gas itself cannot generate force because there is simply
nothing to "receive" that energy. The energy would merely dissipate
into the vacuum. The gas pushing against the rocket itself would not
propel it in space. On Earth the gases from a rocket dispense that
energy and push against air, gravity etc. What do the gases push
against in space? Two forces that come from the same body cannot
create propulsion. There needs to be an outside force. Much like you
cannot blow your own sail (inb4 flawed Myth-busters experiment) or
lift yourself off the ground with your own arms. The gas pushes
against the rocket yes, the rocket against the gas, but the rocket
pushes against nothing, the gas pushes against nothing, only against
one another. How would that create propulsion? People assume that
physics on Earth pertain to physics in space, which they do not
because the very things that define physics on Earth (Inertia,
momentum, resistance, friction etc.) do not exists in space.

Here is another thing to think about. "An object in motion stays in
motion unless acted upon by an outside force" correct? If you throw a
ball on Earth is is acted upon by gravity, friction, wind resistance
etc. Throw a ball in space it is acted upon by nothing. It keeps going
indefinitely because nothing acts upon it in a vacuum. So then, when a
rocket accelerates in space, how do they stop it? How do the steer it?
How do they prevent it from exponential acceleration? None of it makes
sense. Even if you believe that rockets work in space and that the gas
causes propulsion, in a vacuum something would keep accelerating if
something keeps propelling it. To stop, you would need to exert
MASSIVE amounts of force in the opposite direction to stop it. Think
about that. Even so, there still remains nothing in space to even
create propulsion in the first place.

You have to question things to move forward.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 5:24 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: CUNTICA <brianlambsn...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 5:24 am
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
" Now, this rocket starts spewing gas out its rear end."

That sounds more like your muzzie/wog pig farts?

"Much like you cannot blow your own"

\\\\\\\\Y///////
^
(     )
I    I
I    I
I    I
I    I
O    IO

"Gobble - gobble, gobble - gobble, slurp - slurp"

"Gulp - gulp, lick - lick!'

"Yum - yum!"

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 5:44 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 5:44 am
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
Go away.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 5:42 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 5:42 am
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 9:53 am, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Tell you what, lets send you into space, fill your lungs up to the max
with the vapour of your choice and release you. We could all watch if
you accelerated in any particular direction and for how long.

Guy

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 5:58 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 5:58 am
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 9:53 am, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> You have to question things to move forward.

To move forward you have to apply thrust.
Rockets can provide thrust.
Rockets work.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 2:51 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 2:51 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 11:58 am, Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

> On Mar 30, 9:53 am, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > You have to question things to move forward.

> To move forward you have to apply thrust.
> Rockets can provide thrust.
> Rockets work.

ITS FAKE!

:)

prove it they can push against nothing... All what I ask... I thought
that would be easy for all the clever boys in 5 groups, to prove me my
conclusions wrong...

People's minds operate in a belief systems construct. (Religion is -
or can be - one of them). So basically it's an integrated (belief)
system of "religions"; some based on supernatural, and the rest on the
physical and political world.

Once formulated, 99.9% of people are unable (and unwilling) to change
their belief dogmas, be it religious, scientific or political, in the
face of ANY data or proof to the contrary.

This makes "science" just a form of religion with immutable tenets and
dogmas.

The 0.1% of us who constantly modify our world construct based on new
facts and information are essentially treated a pariahs.

I personally have been accused many times that "You have said and
believed this-or-that last year, or whenever; why do you profess a
different opinion/belief now?" When I try to explain that I have new
info and facts which puts that very subject in a very different light
and explanation, I'm sill(!) accused of "dishonesty"(!), because "you
said that then, and you you're saying this now".

Apparently, with most people (which I don't understand) once they lock
into a belief system, it becomes a dogma, from which deviation is
heresy, regardless of new info or (new) proof of its utter falsehood.

Basically people are robotic, intellectuallly dishonest, narrowminded
and literally stupid for the most - in spite of their education,
degrees, etc.

Scientists are worse than fundamentalist fanatics when it comes to
accepting

changes no matter how slight the changes may be,

No scientist wants to be seen as less fanatic than any of the others
in the flock. And the flock of bleating

sheep will viciously turn against any one of their own who utters an
unsanctioned word.

Some times the tables get turned on them and then they pretend to not
notice. Immanuel Velikovsky

comes to mind as an example of standing his ground and not caving in
to the naysayers.

As for the thick headed carved in stone types who cannot deal with new
circumstances or facts, we have

one on here who wants to be the Adolph Hitler of the groups and
enforce rigid thinking habits on everyone

else.

All he (she) is accomplishing is to chase people away. What will be
left after the PC cop gets the free thinkers weeded out?

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 3:36 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 3:36 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 7:51 pm, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 30, 11:58 am, Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk>
> wrote:

> > On Mar 30, 9:53 am, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > > You have to question things to move forward.

> > To move forward you have to apply thrust.
> > Rockets can provide thrust.
> > Rockets work.

> ITS FAKE!

Agreed.  Your brain is a fake....

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 3:53 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 3:53 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 4:01 pm, Mark Sieving <mark_siev...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Friday, March 30, 2012 3:53:25 AM UTC-5, Warhol wrote:
> > Now, this rocket starts spewing gas out its rear end. Why would that
> > gas propel it?

> If you really want to know (which I doubt) look up "conservation of momentum".

years
I want to know if cows fly... that will conservation of momentum... ha
ha ha.... Learn to understand what you read people... since thats is a
clear problem here...

Facts is in vacuum the laws of newton like they have learned you have
no effect... and you may try to defend the lie as much as you want,
but that won't never change the facts....,

My words are very simple words you known, Rockets can't fly in
vacuum....

And for the cowards who snip the groups... is that because you don't
have any answer to share? The same reason why they delete my reply s
and thread in any moderated forum...James Randi forum is another one
of those forums on which pro-NASA moderators use their power to
control the direction debates take. That was blatant censorship. The
moderators are trying to keep the discussions inside the box so people
will keep thinking inside the box.

But to give answer to question, that they can not... Let us hide the
truth and pretend as if it doesn't exist... well you ain't lucky I am
already following like a ghost you cowards with my remarks, 9 years
now and I don't even remember the quantity of topics on the many
subject... with no reply, than attacking the messenger... with words
of liars, and cowards, and collaborators and traitors... Are these the
words of the great of the nations, the all powerful boards and
syndicates of the Earth?

"Don't let them see us! Don't tell them what we are doing!"

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 4:14 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 4:14 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 9:36 pm, Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk> wrote:

spent a bit of time there to debunk a 'idiotic theory' didn't you, why
would that be?

although in a round about way you have actually agreed with several
points raised why the rocket would not work in space.

ps yours is an old technique,

if you can't blind them with science, then baffle them with bullshit.

Newton's 3rd law...

that works fine on earth, think about how that works fine on earth
then you will see why it doesn't work in the vacuum of space.

we have been fed so many lies and they rely on our blind acceptance to
continue the lies (seems to be workin well too)...

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 5:16 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 5:16 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 3:53 pm, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 30, 4:01 pm, Mark Sieving <mark_siev...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > On Friday, March 30, 2012 3:53:25 AM UTC-5, Warhol wrote:
> > > Now, this rocket starts spewing gas out its rear end. Why would that
> > > gas propel it?

> > If you really want to know (which I doubt) look up "conservation of momentum".

>  years
> I want to know if cows fly... that will conservation of momentum...

Yes, fire enough gas out of a cow's rear end and it will fly in space
too.

The gas will go out and push the other mass in the opposite direction,
the same way a rifle will push against your shoulder when you fire a
shot from it.

The main thing about space is that aerodynamics don't apply in the
vacuum. No wings needed, nor will they work as in an atmosphere.
Control surfaces are out and thrust must be used to maneuver the
craft.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 6:25 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
From: Joe Bruno <atjoebru...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 6:25 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand

Rockets don't push against anything.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 30 2012, 10:00 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 30 2012 10:00 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 9:14 pm, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Because your "reasoning" is so risable as to neither require nor
deserve detailed refutation - merely mockery, and then only when I
feel so inclined.  Society has progressed to a state where it is
unacceptable to throw stale buns at drooling village idiots, but
fortunately usenet has provided those of us so inclined with an
equvalent...

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 31 2012, 2:49 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 2:49 am
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 4:53 am, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Earth the gases from a rocket dispense that
> energy and push against air, gravity etc. What do the gases push
> against in space?

Front of the engine.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 31 2012, 1:35 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand

> On Mar 30, 4:53 am, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > On Earth the gases from a rocket dispense that
> > energy and push against air, gravity etc. What do the gases push
> > against in space?

> Front of the engine.

NO, this cannot work in a vacuum. You just ignored the effects that
the vacuum would have on the situation, such as an expanding fuel/gas
would have nothing to push against. This is bogus science.

Read carefully, I don't want you to miss this.

First to begin, let me correct your comment.
1) We are dealing in space not earth.
2) There is a vacuum not an atmosphere.
3) The rocket is not throwing a heavy ball anywhere, it is exhausting
burnt fuel in the form of an expanding gas.

So we go on, the expanding gas is needed as a pressurised from of
propellant in order to propel the rocket forward as it tries to
relieve pressure by flowing through a designed nozzle (and the gas is
not forced out in the same essences as anybody throwing a heavy ball).
Because the section of the chamber facing the rocket is still
subjected to pressure, it will force the rocket forward.

A vacuum however, will aid (I don't like to say suck) the gas in it's
escape out of the chamber and increase expansion when gases exit the
chamber. This will rob the engine of force needed to thrust the rocket
forward. Hence the rocket concept will not work in the vacuum of space
and fall back down to earth.

lol

they're not in space!

same as the 'space' shuttle lol

and still nobody has presented a video of rocket providing thrust in a
vacuum? hmmm why is that?

lol, take here a deep breath sonny...

Until any of you tards put together a vacuum chamber and prove that a
small rocket will produce thrust in said vacuum chamber, STFU.
rocket on wheels on runway, lightweight huge vacuum chamber attached
to rocket exhaust, vacuum chamber doesn't blow up or cause any extra
resistance to the rocket, rocket is fired, does the rocket still move
forward? your science says YES, me says NO.

Firstly the rocket isn't throwing anything. It is the expansion of
gases in a chamber looking for a way out to further expand in order to
equalise in pressure with the outside environment in order to create
thrust.
All is done is the fuel is ignited and the rest takes place on it's
own. with the carefully calculated design of the nozzle thrust is
achieved. In the example you have drawn, it is the same as if we say
the rocket pushes the gas out but in fact the gas escapes through the
relatively small nozzle via it's own expansion in the chamber.
But in a vacuum this gas will be aided (again I don't like to say
suck) out of the chamber by the negative force (vacuum) acting on the
gas.

How ever you and every other person that backs this theory needs to
prove your claims that rockets will work in the vacuum of space. As
far as physics is concerned it will not work.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 31 2012, 1:42 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 31, 4:00 am, Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk> wrote:

why don't people think anymore? they just spout what they are told an
have a belief that that is true.

sheep I suppose???

truth has become like a Ghost, never look at it with the eyes...
http://youtu.be/RJalKuRs0H4?t=1m16s

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 31 2012, 1:46 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 1:46 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 30, 11:16 pm, "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@msn.com>
wrote:

imagine yourself farting in space...

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 31 2012, 2:04 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 2:04 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 31, 1:35 pm, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > On Mar 30, 4:53 am, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > > On Earth the gases from a rocket dispense that
> > > energy and push against air, gravity etc. What do the gases push
> > > against in space?

> > Front of the engine.

> NO, this cannot work in a vacuum. You just ignored the effects that

You are a fucking idiot. How `bout we put you in a vacuum chamber,
shove an Estes D12-5 up your ass, and start it.

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
 Discussion subject changed to "Brains will not work in Warhol" by Budikka666
More options Mar 31 2012, 2:30 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 2:30 pm
Subject: Brains will not work in Warhol
On Mar 30, 3:53 am, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Look at it this way. Let's suppose a rocket is floating... incorrect,
> since things cannot "float" in space. Okay, let's say a rocket is
> stationary in space. Nothing is acting on this rocket.

Never happens.

> It's weight is
> null because it is in a vacuum.

Lie.  The "weightlessness" has nothing whatsoever to do with vacuums
or lack thereof.

> It has no resistance to anything. When
> you stand and push something, you have all sorts of Resistances acting
> on you and the object you push. Friction of your feet on the floor,
> wind, weight, gravity. In space, none of these things exist. The
> rocket cannot exert energy because there simply is nothing to exert it
> against.

Lie.

> Now, this rocket starts spewing gas out its rear end. Why would that
> gas propel it?

Newton's laws of motion.

Go get an education, then think about posting your cluelessness in the
news groups - especially the atheist ones where our regulars are
sharper than usual.
[Rest snipped before i bust a gut laughing]

Budikka

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
 Discussion subject changed to "Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand" by Warhol
More options Mar 31 2012, 3:58 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 3:58 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 31, 8:04 pm, "panamfl...@hotmail.com rade"

Why? Because its takes physics to fly on earth?

What's the physics of orbit? Nothing?

You can't have physics in a vacuum.
You can't have an object interacting with nothing.

not wading through the pages of shill-fest (they come out of the
woodwork for anything nasa-related)

but did anyone come up with a video of rocket propulsion working in a
vacuum? that would be a worthwhile experiment to try and document,
wouldn't it?

Why is NASA even pretending to orbit SPACE? -- You can't fly or remain
aloft in a vacuum. Why? Why the pathetic comedy?

Vacuum is NASA Palestine... they get ejected by Hassan...

"NASA should not exist”

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
 Discussion subject changed to "Brains will not work in Warhol" by Brad Guth
More options Mar 31 2012, 5:41 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 5:41 pm
Subject: Re: Brains will not work in Warhol
On Mar 31, 11:30 am, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:

Moors like Warhol were not only home-schooled or rather cave-schooled,
but obviously self-taught.  It's one of the main reasons why they've
never had to pay any taxes.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
 Discussion subject changed to "Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand" by Moramarth
More options Mar 31 2012, 6:46 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 6:46 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 31, 6:42 pm, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> why don't people think anymore?

They do.  It's just that for anyone with rational thought processes,
they won't come up with anything like your "truth".
space proves attempting a reasoned arguement would be fruitless.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 31 2012, 6:37 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: Moramarth <Morama...@moramarth.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 6:37 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 31, 6:46 pm, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> imagine yourself farting in space...

If he wants to fart into empty space, he only has to put his butt-

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Mar 31 2012, 8:01 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 31 2012 8:01 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Mar 31, 2:04 pm, "panamfl...@hotmail.com rade"

0 - 30 Newtons thrust in under 0.30 seconds.  That's roughly
equivalent to kicking his ass with a 66 lb boot.

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Apr 1 2012, 10:55 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
From: "panamfl...@hotmail.com" <panamfl...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Apr 1 2012 10:55 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand

That may not be big enough to give this little jailhouse bitch the
kick in the ass he deserves..but I'm lazy. I did qualify L1 on an H or
something here in the US, but that was with a reloadable. Had to
borrow a casing and assemble the motor (and do the math to determine
the delay/ejection charge) m'self! I've turned into one of those guys
who just builds clones of Estes/Centuri kits. Can't beat just walking
into the hobby shop & buying a motor to do the deed. Like Stein/Estes/
Carlisle said 60yrs ago, the model airplane guys don't have to build
their motors...<bfg>

-PF, Atl.
#2015/KoBAAWA!

To post a message you must first join this group.
You do not have the permission required to post.
More options Apr 1 2012, 11:10 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism, soc.culture.israel, sci.military.naval
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 20:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Apr 1 2012 11:10 pm
Subject: Re: Rockets will not work in space and that is simple to understand
On Apr 1, 10:55 pm, "panamfl...@hotmail.com" <panamfl...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

The smell of a burnt out Estes motor was the smell of my childhood.