Gum On My Shoe
David Von Pein
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/dc395fae27394bb9
>>> "Von Pein must have deleted his review of "Biting The Elephant" as I don't see his review anymore. Typical tactic by the lone nut losers after they are exposed." <<<
I never wrote a review for that book in the first place. It never
existed, and DiEugenio never laid eyes on any review written by me for
Rodger Remington's 2009 book "Biting The Elephant".
DiEugenio is either a liar or a dunce, as I've already told this
aggregation in this very thread on January 25, 2010. Didn't you even
read what I wrote in this thread, Al Kaline?
Here's a replay:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/8c62bff762e6e598
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/c618a3438d9ea232
And after telling the lie about me on the January 21, 2010, Black Op
Retard-fest, DiEugenio decided to go one step further and continue
telling the same lie about me on Black Op on February 4, 2010.
http://www.Box.net/shared/ughzn0pl86
In the above-linked Black Op program, conspiracy theorist James
DiEugenio actually claims he SAW FOR HIMSELF a review written by me
(DVP) on the webpage linked below for Mr. Remington's "Biting The
Elephant" book:
http://www.Amazon.com/dp/1426917481
As everyone can see, however, there is no review written by me on that
page. And no, I did not "delete" any review from that webpage, as Al
Kaline68 has suggested.
I have no idea why DiEugenio has a desire to tell these "Biting The
Elephant" lies about me on two different Black Op Radio programs
recently, but it goes to show one of two things:
1.) Jim DiEugenio is a dope who lacks the research skills to get his
facts straight concerning a very simple matter -- i.e., identifying a
certain review written by a certain person for a specific book.
Or:
2.) Jim DiEugenio is a liar.
There is no third option here.
As I said in my 1/25/10 post, this matter is very, very small and
insignificant in the broad scheme of things associated with the JFK
assassination (quite obviously), but it does bother me when I am
accused of doing something (writing a review for a particular book)
that I did not do.
And now, via the post written by "kaline68", I see that I'm going to
have to face a secondary problem as a result of DiEugenio's blatant
lie (or his idiocy by not getting his facts straight) -- and that is
the problem of the kooks who will ALWAYS place their faith in the liar
(in this instance, Jim DiEugenio) instead of believing the person who
is telling the truth (in this case, David Von Pein).
Now that I think a little more about this little incident regarding
Jim DiEugenio's lie that he decided to invent about me, it makes me
realize what a truly difficult (even impossible) task it is for a
person who has done nothing wrong and is telling the complete truth to
be believed by certain people who have no desire to believe the truth
at all.
A few good examples of this (on a much more important level relating
to the JFK murder case) would be: Buell Wesley Frazier, Linnie Mae
Randle, Roy Truly, Will Fritz, Arlen Specter, Earl Warren, Gerald
Ford, Robert Frazier, and many other people who are accused of telling
one lie after another by many conspiracy theorists of the world (James
DiEugenio among them).
No matter what those witnesses and investigative officials say with
respect to OSWALD HAVING BEEN GUILTY of murdering President Kennedy
and Officer Tippit, they simply will not be believed.
To certain conspiracy theorists, ALL of those people I just mentioned
are evil liars and/or "cover-up" artists. With respect to Wesley
Frazier and Linnie Randle specifically, I put their names on the above
list due to the fact that Jim DiEugenio has recently decided (without
a speck of evidence to support his beliefs) that both Frazier and
Randle lied (or were coerced by the authorities into lying) when they
each claimed to have seen Lee Harvey Oswald carrying a large paper bag
on the morning of November 22, 1963.
Now, given the fact that DiEugenio seems to firmly believe that Oswald
carried NO LARGE PAPER BAG AT ALL to work with him on 11/22/63, I'm
guessing that there is virtually NOTHING on God's green Earth that
will sway Jim away from his silly recently-acquired belief that LHO
had no large bag with him at all as he left Ruth Paine's house on the
morning of the assassination.
Similarly, it just dawned on me (after reading the post written by
"kaline68" in this thread) that it will probably be totally futile on
my part to attempt to defend myself against James DiEugenio's little
lie that he (for whatever reason) decided to tell about me on Black Op
Radio on both January 21, 2010, and February 4, 2010.
In a small way, I can now totally understand what it's like to be in
the shoes of Arlen Specter...or Earl Warren...or Gerald Ford...or
David Belin...or Marina Oswald...or Wesley Frazier...or Captain
Fritz...etc., etc.
An untrue accusation is like gum on your shoe....it's a hard thing to
get rid of.
David Von Pein
February 5, 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/Reclaiming-History/browse_thread/thread/863ee417ecb1633f
WhiskyJoe
> DiEugenio is either a liar or a dunce ...
David
I think this is one of the rare times that you are
mistaken. I'm certain that DiEugenio is both.
> There is no third option here.
Yes there is. Both.
David Von Pein
Just for fun, let's take a look at the responses from the conspiracy
crowd concerning this admittedly-insignificant issue regarding the
"Biting The Elephant" lie that Jim DiEugenio (twice) told about me on
Black Op Radio:
"David Von Pein has done more to sell conspiracy books than any
positive revue [sic]. And he continues to do so. In contrast, I'm
wondering if his high appraisal of RH ["Reclaiming History"] long
before it came out contributed to its premature decline." -- Gil
Jesus; 01/24/2010
"No advertising shithead." -- David G. Healy ("aeffects");
01/25/2010
[Gee, the above gem is a really innovative and surprising retort by
Healy, isn't it?]
"Perhaps you should make a personal appearance someplace and
clear the air, eh? ROTFLMFAO! I can see it now, DVP will you please
come to the podium and sixteen people head for the microphone. DVP
you're a troll, deal with it!" -- David G. Healy; 01/26/2010
[I see that Healy is still living in his fantasy world. And evidently
I've now morphed into being sixteen different people. I'm definitely
marching into my boss' office at Langley tomorrow and demanding that
much-deserved salary increase! I'm tired of doing the work of 16
people for the paltry sum the CIA is currently dishing out!]
"Von Pein must have deleted his review of "Biting The Elephant",
as I don't see his review anymore. Typical tactic by the lone nut
losers after they are exposed." -- "kaline68"; 02/05/2010
[Take note of how the lie told by DiEugenio has suddenly become the
absolute rock-solid truth for "kaline68". And now, suddenly, it is DVP
who is the liar, per Al Kaline (who was, indeed, a great ballplayer).]
"ROFLMAO...maybe it's finally sinking in that he's done more to
further the cause of conspiracy in the death of JFK than any
conspiracy book ever could. I notice that when he [DVP] makes a post
and I reply, he sometimes deletes the original post, making my
response the first entry. It's like he posts something stupid and when
I reveal how stupid it is, he deletes it and usually responds with
some foolish insult. Yep. Typical tactic for him." -- Gil Jesus;
02/05/2010
[For the record, whenever I delete a post (which is constantly, I
admit), it is always, without exception, due to the fact that I have
discovered a spelling or grammatical error that I invariably make in
nearly every post I submit to the newsgroups. And since I cannot stand
errors in my archived posts, I am therefore forced to delete the error-
filled message and replace it with a corrected version.
I'm sure Gil Jesus likes his explanation for my deletions better, and
he will probably continue to believe that I delete a lot of posts for
reasons other than spelling/grammar. But, like always, Gilbert J.
Jesus will be wrong. Surprise!]
"Dancing the two-step, eh moron? And, you've never met a book
review you couldn't or WOULDN'T rewrite to suit your pathetic
purposes....Carry on!" -- David G. Healy; 02/06/2010
[Healy's a hoot, isn't he? Now watch him leap to another wrong "Von
Pein is Keating!" conclusion just because I said the word "hoot". He
loves doing that.]
"Whatever Jim Di is saying is irrelevant, you're lying -- you
can't hep yursef [sic].... <snip the lone nut troll lunacy>" -- David
G. Healy; 02/06/2010
[Another sparkling comeback by Mr. Crackpipe, a true master of the
English language indeed. "Hep yursef"??? Is Healy really in his 50s?
Or was his last stop the third grade? ~shrug~]
"MORE ON VON PEIN'S SILLY BEHAVIOR ON AMAZON:
http://www.blackopradio.com/black460a.ram" -- Gil Jesus; 02/06/2010
[The "Elephant" lie has taken root in Gilbert Jesus' mind too. Nice.
And typical.]
"Whatever Von Pein says, almost invariably the opposite is
true...like clockwork." -- "lazuli777"; 02/06/2010
[And now we have "Ol Laz" chiming in, right on cue, to lend support to
the liar named DiEugenio. Again--nice and typical. Laz probably also
believes there were two Oswalds running around Dealey Plaza on
11/22/63. After all, James DiEugenio now seems to believe in the
"Double Oswald" fantasy, so Jim's coattails certainly have enough room
for one more ill-informed conspiracy theorist named "lazuli777".]
SOURCE LINK:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/dc395fae27394bb9