Dan wrote:
> Optibike: total Whr/$ : 1000 cycles x 36 V x 23 Ah / $1500 = 552
> LiFePo4: total Whr/$ : 1750 cycles x 51.2 V x 15 Ah / $1400 = 960
This does put the LiFePo4 at an advantage for longevity. About energy
density...
The 15 Ah pack presented here weighs 6.67 kg (14.7 lb) so:
LiFePo4: 51.2 V x 15 Ah / 6.67 kg ==> 115 Wh/kg
I found the weight of the Opti's battery, from Dan's message in
another topic:
http://groups.google.com/group/Tidalforce/msg/a9e3784b1dfaad4d
> Optibike, LiCo, is 900/6.8 = 132 Wh/kg
> Li-poly 110 Wh/kg
> LiMn 90 Wh/kg
> LiFePO4 about 70 Wh/kg
> NiMH is about 60 Wh/kg
> NiCad 48 Wh/kg
> Pb 38 Wh/kg
> These are general numbers derived from real world battery weight and not high performance lab conditions.
So it seems the energy densities are comparable:
Optibike, LiCo: 36 V x 23 Ah / 6.8 kg ==> 122 Wh/kg
I'm not concerned myself with the cycles: Even the "low" 1000 cycles
of the Optibike would give this 1-2 times/week guy a battery lasting
him 13 years. So other factors would first intervene, and no need for
my battery to last me that long when I expect technology to make it
obsolete in a fraction of the time it will last. But for the commuter
that uses his bike 5 times/week, the life of his battery can affect
the resale value of his ebike when he starts lusting after the new
models.
Another perspective may be to consider that a LiFePo4 battery can
offer more abusive currents and still give a similar life as LiPo or
LiCo
Jerome