Florida: Loyalty Lawsuit Rocks the Supremes - Spawned by Invalid Oaths

17 views

Skip to first unread message

Bob Hurt

unread,

Nov 2, 2006, 5:26:28 PM11/2/06

to Bob Hurt

Florida: Loyalty Lawsuit Rocks the Supremes - Spawned by Invalid Oaths

North Central Florida local officials scramble to respond to Antolic lawsuit filed in Florida Supreme Court

Petition demands disqualification of all candidates and incarceration of elected officials for invalid oaths, false oaths, and impersonation

31 October 2006, Talahassee Florida –Gainesville Florida Paralegal Tayra Antolick filed a petition (attached hereto) in the Florida Supreme Court, seeking a writ of mandamus to disqualify all candidates in the 7 November 2006 elections on the basis of invalid loyalty and employment oaths, and to arrest oath violators under Florida Statutes 876.05 (public employee oath) et seq and 99.021 (candidate oath). The petition alleges that elected officials throughout the state have committee felony crimes by swearing false oaths and impersonating public officers, and seeks an order to Florida Secretary of State Sue Cobb to disqualify all candidates for elected office for having defective, and therefore non-existent, oaths.

The oath statutes 876.05 and 99.021 require that all public (government) employees and candidates in the state of Florida swear an oath of loyalty to support the US and Florida Contstitutions, and asserting that they have qualified for their offices. Candidates and public employees must acknowledge the oath before a person duly authorized to take acknowledgments, like a notary. Thus, a notary, judge, or clerk must sign the oath document or an attachment thereto attesting to the acknowledgment. Public employees must take an oath properly prior to drawing a first paycheck from the government.

Fellow legal researcher and We The People Congress supporter Bob Hurt of Clearwater, Fla., discovered during the summer that most elected officials and all candidates for state and local offices who have sworn oaths in compliance with 876.05 have failed to do so before a notary, opting instead to execute the oath under “penalty of perjury” while violating the statute by omitting the notary signature.

Hurt explained that elected officials have violated the false oath statute by swearing in the employee oath that they had qualified for the position. According to Hurt, they could not have qualified because they did not have a lawful candidate’s oath on record. He also said that their service in the elected position constituted a violation of the statute penalizing impersonation of a public employee. Both violations constitute 3^rd degree felonies (see Florida Statutes 95.525(3).

When interviewed, Hurt had little public comment other than to say “I see every elected official in the state as a double felon. Our public officials seem to scoff at the law and have little respect for the Constitution they claim to support.” Hurt said he reported the violations to the Attorney General and Deputy Chief Counsel Sharon Larson of the Florida Department of State’s (DOS) Division of Elections, but neither group took any remedial action, and candidate oath forms on the Department of State web site still show the invalid oath forms. Larson did point out, however, that the oath signed by DOS employees bears a jurat.

Antolick discovered even more egregious oath violations. She began her research into the issue as a result of what she considered high-handed and unlawful behavior by her county’s code enforcement officials. In pursuing justice, she obtained copies of oaths for county officials. Her findings astonished her. The records showed that some public employees had no oaths at all, and many had no awareness that their jobs required them to swear or affirm a loyalty oath..

In the interview about her discovery, Antolick explained that when Gainesville area local government officials learned of her investigation, they scurried to have notaries take their acknowledgments of newly sworn oaths, so as to comply with law. She said she believe most Putnam county officials now have properly acknowledged oaths, and that their scramble proves they had invalid oaths all along. Some had up to 20 years of employment with the government, and had no oath on record. When asked what tasks lay before her to expose those shocking violations of law, Antolick said “Tomorrow I have to make over 3000 copies of the evidence and serve copies of the lawsuit on thirteen parties, including the Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, Tax Collectors of six counties, and the Putnam County Sheriff, Clerk, and Property Appraiser.”

Antolick said that she bears all the costs of the lawsuit, evidence duplication, mailing, and transportation. “The expense could top $1000,” she asserted when expressing concern over her meager financial resources to cover the costs of filing this action on behalf of fellow Floridians. “I just want our public officials to obey the most important law in our state, the one requiring them to make a firm, verifiable commitment to support our constitutions,” she explained. “I want public employees to comply with oath laws, and then support the constitution and protect our rights as the oath requires. They spare no expense if making us obey the law, want them to obey it too.”

Antolick and Hurt believe the oath issue warrants any necessary remedial action because it challenges the proof of the trustworthiness and integrity of public servants who exercise government authority. According to Hurt, “The Constitution provides the only guarantee that government employees will not abuse their power by wrongfully assuming and wielding authority they do not have. That makes the constitutional requirements for loyalty oaths the most important laws on the books. Even voters must sign a loyalty oath because through their votes they wield governing power.”

Hurt explained that citizens find it virtually impossible to make public officials obey their oaths, particularly in the judicial branch, and most particularly in states like Florida that have no uniform bonding legislation to impose financial penalties on oath violators. “Now, citizens have to file lawsuits in order to make code enforcers take an oath properly,” he said. “Like most Floridians, I don’t trust people in government because they find it so easy to abuse their power. So, before hiring them to serve me, I want to see a written, credibly witnessed, solemn promise that they will protect my constitutionally guaranteed rights. That’s what the oath laws seek to accomplish. And that’s why I want Tayra Antolick to prevail in this case. “

Hurt also claims that the scofflaw attitude about oaths among public employees prior to 2000 led anonymous Florida policymakers to a change in the various loyalty oath forms at all levels of government. “Public employees found it just too bothersome to have to round up a notary to witness their oath acknowledgments, so some bigwig promulgated the false idea that public employees and candidates could dispense with notaries and sign oaths under penalty of perjury instead. I feel certain more than one policymaker stands culpable of a conspiracy that has now led to this Supreme Otherwise, Florida’s oath laws constitute a sham, and public. I look forward to finding the culprits in my investigation.”

Antolick credits Hurt with legal research for the lawsuit. She said “[without Hurt’s being] diligent in research and in sharing the results with all of us, the Petition would not have been written.” Hurt maintains an educational mailing list to which he posts his research results. Anyone may join to stay informed and learn how to encourage righteousness in government by sending email to Lawmen-s...@googlegroups.com.

Antolick says that her lawsuit has brought sadness and disappointment to her personal life because of disparaging remarks from past friends and associates. One belittled her in an open letter, and one even accused her of anarchy. She has penned a written response to her detractors (see references below, names redacted for privacy), explaining that “The law is what the Florida legislature tells its creatures to obey. Without that obedience, the people are damaged and there is anarchy.”

Antolick said she has not engaged an attorney to represent her in the case, and that she will gladly accept donations from others who support her efforts to bring honesty and lawfulness to government. Supporters of Antolick’s efforts can send donations in the form of blank (no payee name) money orders or currency wrapped in aluminum foil to the following address:

Oath Support

113 Acre Road

Hawthorn, FL 32640

Interested parties may reach Tayra Antolick for comment at (352) 481-3130, and Bob Hurt at (727) 669-5511.

# # #

References:

Constitution for the United States of America, Article VI [Legal Status of Constitution]

Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Constituiton for the State of Florida, Article II SECTION 5. Public officers.--

(b) Each state and county officer, before entering upon the duties of the office, shall give bond as required by law, and shall swear or affirm:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States and of the State of Florida; that I am duly qualified to hold office under the Constitution of the state; and that I will well and faithfully perform the duties of (title of office) on which I am now about to enter. So help me God.",

and thereafter shall devote personal attention to the duties of the office, and continue in office until a successor qualifies.

Constituiton for the State of Florida, ARTICLE VI Suffrage and Elections SECTION 3. Oath.—

Each eligible citizen upon registering shall subscribe the following: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Florida, and that I am qualified to register as an elector under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida."

Florida Statutes

99.021 Form of candidate oath.--

(1)(a) Each candidate, whether a party candidate, a candidate with no party affiliation, or a write-in candidate, in order to qualify for nomination or election to any office other than a judicial office as defined in chapter 105, shall take and subscribe to an oath or affirmation in writing. A printed copy of the oath or affirmation shall be furnished to the candidate by the officer before whom such candidate seeks to qualify and shall be substantially in the following form:

State of Florida
County of_____

Before me, an officer authorized to administer oaths, personally appeared (please print name as you wish it to appear on the ballot) , to me well known, who, being sworn, says that he or she is a candidate for the office of _____; that he or she is a qualified elector of _____ County, Florida; that he or she is qualified under the Constitution and the laws of Florida to hold the office to which he or she desires to be nominated or elected; that he or she has taken the oath required by ss. 876.05-876.10, Florida Statutes; that he or she has qualified for no other public office in the state, the term of which office or any part thereof runs concurrent with that of the office he or she seeks; and that he or she has resigned from any office from which he or she is required to resign pursuant to s. 99.012, Florida Statutes.

(Signature of candidate)

(Address)

Sworn to and subscribed before me this _____ day of _____, (year) , at _____ County, Florida.

(Signature and title of officer administering oath)

876.05 Public employees; oath.--

(1) All persons who now or hereafter are employed by or who now or hereafter are on the payroll of the state, or any of its departments and agencies, subdivisions, counties, cities, school boards and districts of the free public school system of the state or counties, or institutions of higher learning, and all candidates for public office, are required to take an oath before any person duly authorized to take acknowledgments of instruments for public record in the state in the following form:

I, _____, a citizen of the State of Florida and of the United States of America, and being employed by or an officer of _____ and a recipient of public funds as such employee or officer, do hereby solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Florida.

(2) Said oath shall be filed with the records of the governing official or employing governmental agency prior to the approval of any voucher for the payment of salary, expenses, or other compensation.

876.06 Discharge for refusal to execute.—

If any person required by ss. 876.05-876.10 to take the oath herein provided for fails to execute the same, the governing authority under which such person is employed shall cause said person to be immediately discharged, and his or her name removed from the payroll, and such person shall not be permitted to receive any payment as an employee or as an officer where he or she was serving.

876.07 Oath as prerequisite to qualification for public office.—

Any person seeking to qualify for public office who fails or refuses to file the oath required by this act shall be held to have failed to qualify as a candidate for public office, and the name of such person shall not be printed on the ballot as a qualified candidate.

876.08 Penalty for not discharging.—

Any governing authority or person, under whom any employee is serving or by whom employed who shall knowingly or carelessly permit any such employee to continue in employment after failing to comply with the provisions of ss. 876.05-876.10, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

876.09 Scope of law.

(1) The provisions of ss. 876.05-876.10 shall apply to all employees and elected officers of the state, including the Governor and constitutional officers and all employees and elected officers of all cities, towns, counties, and political subdivisions, including the educational system.

(2) This act shall take precedence over all laws relating to merit, and of civil service law.

876.10 False oath; penalty.—

If any person required by the provisions of ss. 876.05-876.10 to execute the oath herein required executes such oath, and it is subsequently proven that at the time of the execution of said oath said individual was guilty of making a false statement in said oath, he or she shall be guilty of perjury.

92.50 Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments; who may take or administer; requirements.--

(1) IN THIS STATE.--Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments required or authorized under the laws of this state (except oaths to jurors and witnesses in court and such other oaths, affidavits and acknowledgments as are required by law to be taken or administered by or before particular officers) may be taken or administered by or before any judge, clerk, or deputy clerk of any court of record within this state, including federal courts, or before any United States commissioner or any notary public within this state. The jurat, or certificate of proof or acknowledgment, shall be authenticated by the signature and official seal of such officer or person taking or administering the same; however, when taken or administered before any judge, clerk, or deputy clerk of a court of record, the seal of such court may be affixed as the seal of such officer or person.

92.525 Verification of documents; perjury by false written declaration, penalty.--

(1) When it is authorized or required by law, by rule of an administrative agency, or by rule or order of court that a document be verified by a person, the verification may be accomplished in the following manner:

(a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 to administer oaths; or

(b) By the signing of the written declaration prescribed in subsection (2).

(2) A written declaration means the following statement: "Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing [document] and that the facts stated in it are true," followed by the signature of the person making the declaration, except when a verification on information or belief is permitted by law, in which case the words "to the best of my knowledge and belief" may be added. The written declaration shall be printed or typed at the end of or immediately below the document being verified and above the signature of the person making the declaration.

(3) A person who knowingly makes a false declaration under subsection (2) is guilty of the crime of perjury by false written declaration, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(4) As used in this section:

(a) The term "administrative agency" means any department or agency of the state or any county, municipality, special district, or other political subdivision.

(b) The term "document" means any writing including, without limitation, any form, application, claim, notice, tax return, inventory, affidavit, pleading, or paper.

(c) The requirement that a document be verified means that the document must be signed or executed by a person and that the person must state under oath or affirm that the facts or matters stated or recited in the document are true, or words of that import or effect.

843.0855 Criminal actions under color of law or through use of simulated legal process.--

(1) As used in this section:

(b) The term "person" means an individual, public or private group incorporated or otherwise, legitimate or illegitimate legal tribunal or entity, informal organization, official or unofficial agency or body, or any assemblage of individuals.

(d) The term "public employee" means a public employee as defined by s. 112.061.

(2) Any person who deliberately impersonates or falsely acts as a public officer or tribunal, public employee or utility employee, including, but not limited to, marshals, judges, prosecutors, sheriffs, deputies, court personnel, or any law enforcement authority in connection with or relating to any legal process affecting persons and property, or otherwise takes any action under color of law against persons or property, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Open letter from Leo Wadeson, Denouncing Tayra Antolick

----- Original Message -----

From: Leo Wadeson

To:

Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 1:03 AM

Subject: Religion

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Yahshua my sovereign.

Tyra and Charlie Antolic have had some recent dealings with the Putnam County government here in Florida. In the course of events they have produced a statute from Florida law indicating that public employees should take an oath when hired to perform a specific duty if they are to be paid from public funds. Of course no one ever offered this oath to me in writing. Last Friday all county employees were required to sign an oath or affirmation to defend the constitution. Of course there is a penalty for not signing this oath and basically calls for the termination of the public employee, for instance me. Well long story short they have not fired me and probably wont for obvious reasons. (2000+ public employees in Putnam County alone)

Yesterday, on November 1st 2006 Tyra Antolic came to my office to discuss the issue regarding a statute pertaining to oaths and persons receiving payment from public funds. In essence she wanted me to quit my job and indicated that if I did not I would not show proper repentance before Yahweh and faced at best an uncertain judgment on judgment day. For reasons that may not be obvious to those not personally involved, I did react poorly. I still feel attacked and I am in no way happy to be counseled by someone who did not come to me in the name of my sovereign Yahshua. I stated several points that are strictly spiritual in nature that one, Yahshua has had mercy on me for the entire time I have worked at the county and talks to me audibly quite often, for this reason if he truly was condemning my actions, I feel I am in a pretty good position to know. Secondly, during a discussion about 16 months ago, Yahshua opened up the concept of a farm to me and that I would one day live there. I asked specifically if I should quit my job now, or if I should quit my job when I am to go to the farm (as it is a 1 hour commute to my office from the farm). He indicated that I could keep my job. So when Tiara came to me and explained that in order for me to be repentant, and righteous I had to quit my job, I simply could not fathom the righteousness of her words. Yes, I was offended, and yes I reacted as one who is offended. I do not deal with this kind of nonsense well, and it is nonsense.

Later, the next day at 8:45 pm (about 2 hours ago) my sovereign spoke again to me and recounted the incident to me. He was very clear and adamant for me to not take her words to heart. He then spoke to me and stated for me to preach against this line of thinking and action. Thus I am composing this email to you all.

In truth, our kingdom is not of this world and does not consist of things of this world. Although, we enjoy the benefits of the constitution, it is not our bible, it was not written by my sovereign in heaven; I see no commandment in scripture that indicates that I should worship the constitution of the United States, laws of the State of Florida or any other law created by man. If the kingdom were of this world Yahshua would have commanded his servants to fight on the night he was taken in the Garden of Gethsemane. However, he clearly directed Peter not to fight. Please see Mathew 26: 50 - 54, John 18:36. Is not this action of holding the government to task a form of fighting the system? Is it Charlie and Tyra who are going to set the captives free? Am I to look to myself for strength, to make that great change that heralds in the kingdom of the Father? I say no, I insist no… My sovereign is coming as he testifies; he will render judgment, not man. He will set the crooked paths straight, not man. He will set the captives free, not man. There is no salvation in this action; there is no righteousness in dissecting law of man and constitution, and seeking to defend it. I am so sorry if this offends you… but I ask that you consider exactly what and whom we should be dwelling on, on exactly what and whom we should ponder. Does the scripture testify some place, and you shall keep the constitution as a frontlet before you eyes and guide to direct your paths? I say no, not anywhere. I cannot look to Tyra and Charlie as an example, I cannot justify there actions to choose to dwell on mans documents, when they ought to have sought Yahweh. I cannot see them as an example when they look to themselves to set wrongs right, I put my faith in Yahshua, and only he will establish righteousness. I direct you to consider the final words of my sovereign in Mathew 28: 19 - 20 His command is to baptize in his name and
teach men all that he had commanded. I don’t see a mention of moving to another nation learning their laws and their ways and fighting them in the courts of the lands to right all wrongs as you see them. Folks, this is yet another snare of my enemy, he loves for you to quit pondering the true law, he loves for you to get worked up and “fight the system” he loves for you stop dwelling on Yahweh and to only see injustice, to only see law of man, mans version of right and wrong. This is all very wonderful to my enemy for the people of Israel to debate laws of man, to spend time and resource to make a point. Where is Yahweh in all this I ask? Mark these words carefully and pay heed to this council, the patriotism movement, and similar types of action where a person fights tax law, state law, and constitutional declarations is I repeat is a form of false religion. There is a wicked spirit behind it, it does receive worship, as you dwell on it and ponder it and debate it. And to those of you who mix Yahweh’s ways into these fights, shame on you, exactly who are you to mix Yahweh’s word with man’s dung.

I offer you this,

To fight the government how do you meet your spiritual obligation as stated in Galatians chapter five to display fruits of the spirit?

Love, how does fighting the government display love?
Joy how can you truly know joy if it is robbed constantly in conflict with judges and magistrates?
Peace, how can you be peaceable if you are worked up fighting the government?
Long suffering, how can you truly suffer and was it truly long if you did not wait upon Yahweh?
Gentleness, how can one truly say they are gentle when seeking constantly to strive and conflict?
Goodness, how can it be truly considered good to champion mans laws when we have a perfect law to follow in Yahshua? Is not mans righteousness filthy rags?
Faith, How is it faith to take it upon yourself to make the changes that are reserved for my sovereign Yahshua to enact?
Meekness, how can a believer truly be meek if they are constantly in conflict?
Temperance, how can one have restraint (temperance) when one seeks out the conflict?

We have overcome false religion, We have over come ourselves in nature, all thanks to the guidance of my Sovereign Yahshua, now comes the next test again the choice is before you to seek out mans ways, and mans ideals or to put first the kingdom of Yahweh and Yahshua my sovereign. Its up to you.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Open Letter from Tyra Antolick to her detractors:

To all:

To clarify just one significant detail, my name is Tayra Antolick, not Tyra or Tiara Antolic. Since none of you have read my Petition for Writs of Mandamus I filed with the Supreme Court of Florida, it would be foolish to discuss anything before reading. Therefore, I have attached it. However, I am compelled to respond to some of the things Leo has stated.

I feel very deeply troubled by believers that are hired by the government and do not realize that, once hired, they are creatures of the law. The law is what the Florida legislature tells its creatures to obey. Without that obedience, the people are damaged and there is anarchy.

I truly believe that someone told you, Leo, that I was an anarchist, because that is what you told me I was [which you conveniently neglected to state in your initial email]. If you knew what the word meant, you would know that my actions are quite the opposite. Anarchy is defined in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition: "Absence of government; state of society where there is no law or supreme power; lawlessness or political disorder; destructive of and confusion in government." An anarchist is one who "professes and advocates the doctrines of anarchy." In light of these definitions, ask yourself who is the anarchist? Writs of Mandamus are orders from the court ordering government officials to do their jobs, and not to be anarchists.

Believers don't seem to understand that when they are a creature of a legal fiction, i.e., the government or a corporation, whether religious or secular, they fall under the laws of its creator, the State. Yahshua may not be condemning anyone; but the law is. When you are hired by the world, you are part of its kingdom, regardless of what your private, religious beliefs are. The reason why there is hurt and confusion is because people don't understand that the kingdom of this world, the principalities, powers, and rulers of this world, are secular, not religious. And when you apply for a job, or desire an elected position, or are appointed by someone in government to serve the public, you have volunteered to be in the world's kingdom. Therefore, you must obey its laws; if you don't obey its laws, you pay the consequences. The law is for the lawless, and Putnam County has been lawless for at least 20 years, according to Commissioner Linda Myers.

That being said, I do not want harm to come to anyone. I know there are people who did not know about this law. But, in the legal, public world, those working under it either "know or should have known" the law. I just discovered lawlessness on the part of the government and seek that lawlessness to be corrected and restitution be given to the people making them whole. You will not find in any of my documents that I have a controversy with the government. I am not fighting with the government: I am agreeing with it. I am agreeing with the government as the Florida legislature wants it to be to protect the people of Florida. Associating me with patriot movements that disobey the law is judging me without any evidence. You are bearing and spreading false statements about my character. I came to the people with the power to do the lawful thing, to do their job according to statute, and they refused (anarchy). That is the reason for the petition. The title of the criminal statute I am citing is this:

Florida Statute 876. Criminal Anarchy, Treason, and Other Crimes Against Public Order.

Who is the anarchist here? Who is the treasonous person addressed here? Who is the one committing crimes against public order? Lawless government personnel. I do not know what the Supreme Court is going to do; whatever it decides, it will decide according to law. I am not an anarchist; on the contrary, I am a Floridian who has the duty to hold the government accountable for the laws it writes for itself. The petition is against anarchy and in agreement with the law.

Getting "religious" or "spiritual" does not change the fact that you must abide by the laws that created your position and pays your bills. For at least 20 years, and for at least 10 years, Putnam County and the State of Florida, respectively, have violated the people of Florida by taking life, liberty, and property from them with no legal authority, thus, doing so while impersonating a public official. The have violated Torah in doing this by giving testimony under false pretenses. How do you think those thousands of people feel? That is a very serious thing. That seriousness is what the petition is all about.

Leo, it is obvious that you are very confused in this matter. Speaking with "would-be" authority on things of which you have little knowledge can be dangerous. You spoke of hearing your sovereign through audible voices several times. The fictional world in which you work knows only to deal with those types of incidents via statutory language. People who hear audible voices from non-physical sources may be deemed by the government as needing psychological evaluations and drug testing. When you give instructions according to code, doing it without authority because you had no oath, did you do it because you read and understood the code or did you do it because you heard audible voices? Your employer might look at that as dangerous to the public and be cause for your dismissal. They do not consider any religious or theological criteria in their decision. The point I am trying to make is that it is dangerous to mix legal duty and religion when it is convenient. Instead of promoting unity within the spiritual community, because of your lack of knowledge and your vacillation between corporate, statutory legal fiction and Torah, bible-believing son of Yah, you are double-minded and unstable in your rationale and justification, thus creating division, and such men need to be marked.

I know this whole thing is very hurtful, and you are very justified in finding comfort in your Sovereign Yahshua. But, as a legal fiction, you must abide by your promise or remove yourself from that fictional world (come out). Surely, you have affirmed the oath and from that day on, you believe all is well. I'm sure all of Putnam is in compliance now. That is good. The problem is all the years prior to the date of that oath that all the government employees have participated, in one form or another, in the final acquisition of property with no legal authority. That is a major violation and assault on the people of Florida. If you trust your Sovereign, he will provide for you when you keep your word. That word is "restitution" for harm done. The Commissioners are the ones who have violated you, not me. They knew or should have known the law. They claim they didn't know; well, that's why they have an attorney who gets paid out of our pockets, who himself did not have the oath. Perhaps Yahshua allowed you to stay in your job so that you would experience the liability of being a created fiction in the kingdom of this world.

Concerning Yahshua's words to Peter, He was talking about a physical, bloody, fight against the flesh, against fellow Jews. He was not talking about spiritual fight. The Apostle Paul concurred: We do not fight against flesh and blood, but [we do fight] against principalities and powers. Who do you think they are?

I ask all of you to please not to respond to this email until you have read the petition. If you choose to answer me, the first line of the email should be, "I have read your petition." If I do not see that, I shall delete your email without reading it.

Sincerely,

Tayra Antolick

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Truly, sincerely, and without prejudice,