GWT 1.4 Status Update

16 views
Skip to first unread message

Bruce Johnson

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 4:29:03 AM4/12/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
Hi Folks!

A quick update on GWT 1.4. We're wrapping up new features now and will soon enter a short bugfix phase. It seems like a good time to do a checkpoint and drop a binary distribution for your hacking and experimentation pleasure. If you can swing it, please grab a copy and try out your favorite feature from the 1.4 dev plan: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4 .

First, the disclaimer:
  • This is *not* a release candidate. It's just a snapshot build of the GWT 1.4 code in progress.
  • You definitely should not try to switch over to it for production.
  • There is a some chance of API changes on the new features between now and the release candidate for 1.4.
  • The new features may have introduced new bugs.
  • We still have bugfixes left before we do a GWT 1.4 release candidate; mostly what you'll see in this build is new features.
  • Release notes are absent, and doc is spotty; there will be more for the RC.
Now that all that's out of the way, grab the build for your platform here:
 
  Windows - http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-windows-0.0.858.zip
  Mac OS X - http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-mac-0.0.858.tar.gz
  Linux - http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-linux-0.0.858.tar.gz

We're looking forward to your feedback.

-- Bruce

Dominik Erbsland

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 5:58:58 AM4/12/07
to Google Web Toolkit
this is awesome :-)
# RichTextArea - jgw, knorton
# DisclosurePanel (formerly CollapsiblePanel) - knorton
# Widgets in Tabs - knorton

are exactly the 3 features which I need the most at the moment.
I hope 1.4 will be ready by april 23 since I start working on my
diploma project as a software engineer. (will make a GWT application)

will be the shell-crashing bug be fixed in 1.4, too? (see:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/8027fc677e3e10fa)

dominik


On Apr 12, 10:29 am, "Bruce Johnson" <b...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> A quick update on GWT 1.4. We're wrapping up new features now and will soon
> enter a short bugfix phase. It seems like a good time to do a checkpoint and
> drop a binary distribution for your hacking and experimentation pleasure. If
> you can swing it, please grab a copy and try out your favorite feature from
> the 1.4 dev plan:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4.
>
> First, the disclaimer:
>

> - This is *not* a release candidate. It's just a snapshot build of the


> GWT 1.4 code in progress.

> - You definitely should not try to switch over to it for production.
> - There is a some chance of API changes on the new features between


> now and the release candidate for 1.4.

> - The new features may have introduced new bugs.
> - We still have bugfixes left before we do a GWT 1.4 release


> candidate; mostly what you'll see in this build is new features.

> - Release notes are absent, and doc is spotty; there will be more for


> the RC.
>
> Now that all that's out of the way, grab the build for your platform here:
>
> Windows -http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-windows-0.0.858.zip
> Mac OS X -http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-mac-0.0.858.tar.gz

> Linux -http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-linux-0.0.858.tar.gz

Joseph Ottinger

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 8:13:36 AM4/12/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
I was hoping that 1.4's compiler would be able to handle ignoring
annotations so I wouldn't have to code value objects for my domains. :(

Ryan Dewsbury

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 10:13:08 AM4/12/07
to Google Web Toolkit
Looks like a really exciting release!

I jumped right into trying to use the RichTextArea class but bumped
into a couple problems. Maybe I'm not using it right and should wait
for more docs, but I'll post the errors, although I'm not sure if this
is the right spot to do that. Anyway, here they are:

For IE, the widget is looking for RichEditIE.html and fails. I can't
find this file.
For Firefox, it seems to load great for a blank RichTextArea but if I
create a RichTextArea, add it to a panel, and then add text to it
immediately using setText, I get a javascript error:
"this.a.contentWindow has no properties"

I'll try to test more of these great new features out over the next
few days. There's so much new stuff!!! :)

Ryan


On Apr 12, 4:29 am, "Bruce Johnson" <b...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> A quick update on GWT 1.4. We're wrapping up new features now and will soon
> enter a short bugfix phase. It seems like a good time to do a checkpoint and
> drop a binary distribution for your hacking and experimentation pleasure. If
> you can swing it, please grab a copy and try out your favorite feature from

> the 1.4 dev plan:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4.
>
> First, the disclaimer:
>

> - This is *not* a release candidate. It's just a snapshot build of the


> GWT 1.4 code in progress.

> - You definitely should not try to switch over to it for production.
> - There is a some chance of API changes on the new features between


> now and the release candidate for 1.4.

> - The new features may have introduced new bugs.
> - We still have bugfixes left before we do a GWT 1.4 release


> candidate; mostly what you'll see in this build is new features.

> - Release notes are absent, and doc is spotty; there will be more for


> the RC.
>
> Now that all that's out of the way, grab the build for your platform here:
>

> Linux -http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-linux-0.0.858.tar.gz

Niklas Derouche

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 10:43:57 AM4/12/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
On 4/12/07, Joseph Ottinger <drea...@gmail.com> wrote:

I was hoping that 1.4's compiler would be able to handle ignoring
annotations so I wouldn't have to code value objects for my domains. :(
 
Life sucks. Seriously, COME ON. I see so much complaining (quite apart from all the really weird questions that - if I wasn't so polite and Reiner so prolific, vast and seemlingy bottomless in his undying willingness to taunt people from all over the world - seem to be increasing in number daily) right now. "Why isn't this supported, why isn't that supported".  Implement it. It's open. Just do it. Thanks to all the people who, through their hard work make all of this available to us. Thanks to Reiner and all the others here on the list who take the time to answer questions instead of (like me) dishing out non sequiteurs and ad hominems. There. I have said it.
 
n.

--
----------------------------------------
I've had a wonderful time but
this wasn't it.
                    Groucho Marx

L Frohman

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 10:57:37 AM4/12/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
Agreed, quit complaining, and thanks to the GWT team.

Jason Essington

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 11:06:02 AM4/12/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
Not to worry joe, Annotation support is coming ... just not in the
1.4 release.

The GWT team didn't want to make a half ass hack, then just rip it
out (change its behavior) when the java 1.5 feature set was supported.

-jason

Joseph Ottinger

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 11:10:29 AM4/12/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
Oh, I know it's coming... but I'm too lazy to write VOs in the meantime.
There are a lot of tiny issues to worry about with it, too - which is
why I'd be happy to have the compiler - which is more complex than I
want to dig into, thank you very much, just ignore annotations.

If *I* were to "fix" the compiler, I'm pretty sure it'd be rendered
unusable. And who wants that? :)

Reinier Zwitserloot

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 11:17:53 AM4/12/07
to Google Web Toolkit
Hear, Hear!

And just to try and live up to the praise:

Full java1.5 notational compatibility is plannen as one of the first
features for GWT 1.5. With a bit of luck a beta with just GWT1.4 +
java1.5 notations will be released. Or, better yet, you can just watch
the completely open development process, grab the patches, and build
such a beast yourself!

And as far as GWT1.4 is concerned:
w000000t!

On Apr 12, 4:43 pm, "Niklas Derouche" <nik...@gmail.com> wrote:

Pavel

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 11:33:43 AM4/12/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
Would it be hard to add some sort of gwt-compiler comment block, as a
hack for the time being? Something like this:
/* GWT-IGNORE-{ */
@Annotations
/* }-*/

and gwt compiler could happily ignore those. Looks ugly but it just
might work. :) Then I guess it'd be just as easy to just ignore
annotations...
Although I can see other applications of this comment block...

Just my two cents.

Pavel

Pavel

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 12:03:52 PM4/12/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
Looking forward to the 1.4 release, or a at least RC. Good job!

Just a couple of comments:
- RichTextArea: are undo and redo going to be supported? AFAIK, they
can be easily implemented with execCommand("undo", null) and
execCommand("redo", null) which are supported by all browsers.
- VerticalSplitPanel behaves weirdly in IE -- when I drag the bar it
always appears with the width it was originally loaded with, not the
current width (of the horizontal splitter's right widget), which causes
the scroll bar across the whole panel if there is no sufficient space.

Thanks.

Pavel


Bruce Johnson wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> A quick update on GWT 1.4. We're wrapping up new features now and will
> soon enter a short bugfix phase. It seems like a good time to do a
> checkpoint and drop a binary distribution for your hacking and
> experimentation pleasure. If you can swing it, please grab a copy and
> try out your favorite feature from the 1.4 dev plan:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4 .
>
> First, the disclaimer:
>

> * This is *not* a release candidate. It's just a snapshot build of


> the GWT 1.4 code in progress.

> * You definitely should not try to switch over to it for production.
> * There is a some chance of API changes on the new features


> between now and the release candidate for 1.4.

> * The new features may have introduced new bugs.
> * We still have bugfixes left before we do a GWT 1.4 release


> candidate; mostly what you'll see in this build is new features.

> * Release notes are absent, and doc is spotty; there will be more

George Georgovassilis

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 4:19:30 PM4/12/07
to Google Web Toolkit
I think one can work around annotations with a little automated
preprocessing such as an ant script that:

1. copies java files to a different directory
2. performs a find/replace with regular expressions and removes
annotations
3. unleashes the gwt-compiler on the stripped files
4. cleans up

My only reservation is towards wether the altered source code counts
as a different class signature, which would make this approach useless
for RPC, but that should be easy to test.

wangzx

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 9:02:47 PM4/12/07
to Google Web Toolkit
Not so simply, but also you should process the import statement,
otherwise the java compiler will complain it cant find the annotation
source file.

On Apr 13, 4:19 am, "George Georgovassilis"

George Georgovassilis

unread,
Apr 13, 2007, 5:52:36 AM4/13/07
to Google Web Toolkit
You are right, that escaped me.
It seems a simple task though since the number of namespaces of
allowed import packages should be manageable. True enthusiasts would
parse the module.gwt.xml to obtain them.

kro...@googlemail.com

unread,
Apr 14, 2007, 5:49:18 AM4/14/07
to Google Web Toolkit
@gwt team
This is a very good idea!!!
And try to kick out the IsSerializable interface, please.
(I want to use my object domain in the client layer too)


Thanks to the gwt team their work!
(I'm a big fan)


Greetings
Marc

ISHTIAQ

unread,
Apr 16, 2007, 2:45:36 AM4/16/07
to Google Web Toolkit
Hi Bruce,
I am wounding, can I check-in my piece of code written for "Vertical
Tab" bar and panels to be accommodate in this release?

P.S.: current build only support top- horizontally (left-to-right)
TabBar/Tabpanel, vertical tabbar(top-to-bottom) is needed for example
Document/e-book etc. like application..
and bottom tabbar is needed for example editor/Rich Text, switch code/
design like application.. etc.etc..

-- Ishtiaq

Bruce Johnson wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> A quick update on GWT 1.4. We're wrapping up new features now and will soon
> enter a short bugfix phase. It seems like a good time to do a checkpoint and
> drop a binary distribution for your hacking and experimentation pleasure. If
> you can swing it, please grab a copy and try out your favorite feature from
> the 1.4 dev plan:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4 .
>
> First, the disclaimer:
>

> - This is *not* a release candidate. It's just a snapshot build of the


> GWT 1.4 code in progress.

> - You definitely should not try to switch over to it for production.
> - There is a some chance of API changes on the new features between


> now and the release candidate for 1.4.

> - The new features may have introduced new bugs.
> - We still have bugfixes left before we do a GWT 1.4 release


> candidate; mostly what you'll see in this build is new features.

> - Release notes are absent, and doc is spotty; there will be more for


> the RC.
>
> Now that all that's out of the way, grab the build for your platform here:
>
> Windows -
> http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-windows-0.0.858.zip
> Mac OS X -
> http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-mac-0.0.858.tar.gz
> Linux -
> http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-linux-0.0.858.tar.gz
>
> We're looking forward to your feedback.
>
> -- Bruce
>

> ------=_Part_29040_22079172.1176366543569
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> X-Google-AttachSize: 1900
>
> Hi Folks!<br><br>A quick update on GWT 1.4. We&#39;re wrapping up new features now and will soon enter a short bugfix phase. It seems like a good time to do a checkpoint and drop a binary distribution for your hacking and experimentation pleasure. If you can swing it, please grab a copy and try out your favorite feature from the
> 1.4 dev plan: <a href="http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4</a>
>
> . <br><br>First, the disclaimer:<br><ul><li>
> This is *not* a release candidate. It&#39;s just a snapshot build of the GWT 1.4 code in progress. </li><li>You definitely should not try to switch over to it for production. </li>
>
> <li>There is a some chance of API changes on the new features between now and the release candidate for
> 1.4.</li><li>The new features may have introduced new bugs.</li><li>We still have bugfixes left before we do a GWT 1.4 release candidate; mostly what you&#39;ll see in this build is new features.<br></li><li>Release notes are absent, and doc is spotty; there will be more for the RC.
> </li></ul>Now that all that&#39;s out of the way, grab the build for your platform here:<br>&nbsp; <br>&nbsp; Windows - <a href="http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-windows-0.0.858.zip">http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-windows-0.0.858.zip
> </a><br>&nbsp; Mac OS X - <a href="http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-mac-0.0.858.tar.gz">http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-mac-0.0.858.tar.gz</a><br>&nbsp; Linux - <a href="http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-linux-0.0.858.tar.gz">
> http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-linux-0.0.858.tar.gz</a><br><br>We&#39;re looking forward to your feedback.<br><span class="sg"><br>-- Bruce<br><br>
> </span>
>
> ------=_Part_29040_22079172.1176366543569--

Reinier Zwitserloot

unread,
Apr 16, 2007, 6:08:57 AM4/16/07
to Google Web Toolkit
Ishtiaq, you'd have to submit a patch to the tracker (follow the issue
tracker link from the google code GWT page) to get the ball rolling.

Any bug fixes might make it, new features definitely won't, from what
I understand. If it's a feature, you should probably 'demo' it
somewhere.

ISHTIAQ

unread,
Apr 16, 2007, 8:50:38 AM4/16/07
to Google Web Toolkit
yes Reinier,
its a new feature that I have implemented... providing a demo is
pretty nice advise...
I will get back after hosting it somewhere.

does google provide some space for "demo"?

--
Thanks,
ISHTIAQ AHMAD
European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN)

Bruce Johnson

unread,
Apr 16, 2007, 9:21:25 AM4/16/07
to Google-We...@googlegroups.com
We'd be happy to take a look at your patch, but we aren't planning to add any new features for 1.4. Please see "Submitting Patches" < http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html#submittingpatches> for details on the logistics of submitting your patch.

Is there any particular reason you want Vertical Tab to be in GWT itself so urgently? Why not just keep it as part of your own library for now?

-- Bruce

ianH

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 9:17:52 AM4/17/07
to Google Web Toolkit
I just tried GWT 1.4 on Linux because I was having serious problems
running in hosted mode with Hotspot SIGSEGV crashes. The garbage
collection problem ? It's a fairly large app with RPCs

Well the good news is it doesn't crash anymore, but I did get a few
Java heap space errors until I bumped up Xmx and Xms in Eclipse to -
Xms256m -Xmx512m. However, I did notice that it seemed quite a bit
slower in hosted mode. I'm using the KitchenSink example to lazily
instantiate my panels and first time they used to take about 1 to 2
secs to display, now they take about 20 secs to display. Occasionally
it just hangs in hosted mode and I have to exit Eclipse.

I had problems deploying to Tomcat in that tomcat reported it could
not find a ...nocache.html file. I changed MyApp.html to include
com.test.MyApp.nocache.js from gwt.js and removed the meta tag for
GWT. It now seems to work OK in tomcat. Not sure if that was the right
thing to do but it got me going.

Thanks for the pre-release, it's removed quite a bit of pain running
hosted for me. Hopefully there is still some debugging code causing
the performance slowdown.

Ian.

John Tamplin

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 9:54:28 AM4/17/07
to ianH, Toby Reyelts, Scott Blum, Miguel Méndez, Google Web Toolkit
From: ianH < ian.h...@gmail.com>

I just tried GWT 1.4 on Linux because I was having serious problems
running in hosted mode with Hotspot SIGSEGV crashes. The garbage
collection problem ?  It's a fairly large app with RPCs

Well the good news is it doesn't crash anymore, but I did get a few
Java heap space errors until I bumped up Xmx and Xms in Eclipse to -
Xms256m -Xmx512m. However, I did notice that it seemed quite a bit
slower in hosted mode. I'm using the KitchenSink example to lazily
instantiate my panels and first time they used to take about 1 to 2
secs to display, now they take about 20 secs to display. Occasionally
it just hangs in hosted mode and I have to exit Eclipse.

In the 1.4 milestone release, some debugging code was left enabled so if there was still a problem we would be able to get useful information from the error message.  This debugging code creates a Throwable and fills in the stack trace for each JavaScript object created (to keep a stack trace of where it was created), then tracks it to make sure it is eventually freed exactly once and that no other Java object refers to the same JavaScript object.  For applications like RPC where the code crosses into JSNI frequently, this can eat 60-75% of the app's time.  These tracking objects also dramatically expand memory requirements for JavaScript values, which is why you had to increase the heap size and also contributes to performance decreases due to additional GC runs.

If you are comfortable building from source, you can checkout the current trunk which disables this.  Alternatively, 1.4RC1 will have the debug code disabled when it is released.

Thanks for the pre-release, it's removed quite a bit of pain running
hosted for me. Hopefully there is still some debugging code causing
the performance slowdown.

Yes, as described above, much of the slowdown is due to debugging code.  However, our tests show that without the debugging code it is still slower than 1.3.3, since actually doing the GC correctly takes time and we are now creating many more Java objects than before (previously, it was just a primitive int referring to the underlying JavaScript value, now it is an object).  We have some ideas about improving that (unifying much of the Safari and Mozilla code, reducing the number of GC roots kept in the JSVM), but that won't be in 1.4.

--
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer, Google

Toby Reyelts

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 10:07:48 AM4/17/07
to John Tamplin, ianH, Scott Blum, Miguel Méndez, Google Web Toolkit
Just to be plain though, most of the slowdown you were experiencing is due to the debug code. I don't think we should have released default enabled debug code that was so slow and had such large memory requirements that it made some apps unsable.

nseb

unread,
May 2, 2007, 2:00:00 PM5/2/07
to Google Web Toolkit
date for 1.4RC release ?


On 12 avr, 10:29, "Bruce Johnson" <b...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> A quick update on GWT 1.4. We're wrapping up new features now and will soon
> enter a short bugfix phase. It seems like a good time to do a checkpoint and
> drop a binary distribution for your hacking and experimentation pleasure. If
> you can swing it, please grab a copy and try out your favorite feature from

> the 1.4 dev plan:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4.
>
> First, the disclaimer:
>
> - This is *not* a release candidate. It's just a snapshot build of the


> GWT 1.4 code in progress.

> - You definitely should not try to switch over to it for production.
> - There is a some chance of API changes on the new features between


> now and the release candidate for 1.4.

> - The new features may have introduced new bugs.
> - We still have bugfixes left before we do a GWT 1.4 release


> candidate; mostly what you'll see in this build is new features.

> - Release notes are absent, and doc is spotty; there will be more for


> the RC.
>
> Now that all that's out of the way, grab the build for your platform here:
>

> Linux -http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-linux-0.0.858.tar.gz

Berzehk

unread,
May 2, 2007, 4:48:46 PM5/2/07
to Google Web Toolkit
Yes, tell us! :)

syaskin

unread,
May 2, 2007, 5:05:48 PM5/2/07
to Google Web Toolkit
Do you know if the spell checking library is making it in the 1.4 RC
or will it be there in the final release?
Thanks!

Looking forward to trying 1.4 out!

On Apr 12, 4:29 am, "Bruce Johnson" <b...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> A quick update on GWT 1.4. We're wrapping up new features now and will soon
> enter a short bugfix phase. It seems like a good time to do a checkpoint and
> drop a binary distribution for your hacking and experimentation pleasure. If
> you can swing it, please grab a copy and try out your favorite feature from

> the 1.4 dev plan:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DevPlan_1_4.
>
> First, the disclaimer:
>

> - This is *not* a release candidate. It's just a snapshot build of the


> GWT 1.4 code in progress.

> - You definitely should not try to switch over to it for production.
> - There is a some chance of API changes on the new features between


> now and the release candidate for 1.4.

> - The new features may have introduced new bugs.
> - We still have bugfixes left before we do a GWT 1.4 release


> candidate; mostly what you'll see in this build is new features.

> - Release notes are absent, and doc is spotty; there will be more for


> the RC.
>
> Now that all that's out of the way, grab the build for your platform here:
>

> Linux -http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/gwt-linux-0.0.858.tar.gz

Reinier Zwitserloot

unread,
May 3, 2007, 8:53:58 AM5/3/07
to Google Web Toolkit
The meaning of an RC is that, unless bugs or extreme oversights are
found, the RC will be renamed to 'final release' after a while. If
between an RC and that same version's "Final" release, differences in
features exists, the company or entity that is in charge of naming
failed it. RC = Release Candidate. It's a Candidate to release (which
is the same as 'final', which is after all: the final edition of a
given version number. In other words: The release of that version
number.)

If the nightlies have it now, likely the RC will have it, which
automatically means the final will have it, unless there is an
unsolvable bug that leads to the decision to eject the code entirely
and shove it to 1.5. That's extremely unlikely.

pram

unread,
May 4, 2007, 7:42:11 AM5/4/07
to Google Web Toolkit
I am trying to create a RTE (Rich Text Editor) in my application using
RichTextArea .Every thing is fine but when I am trying to capture
keyboard event in IE I am not able to catch it.But working wonderfully
in Mozilla.

Code snippet :
RichTextArea area = new RichTextArea();
area.addKeyboardListener(new KeyboardListenerAdapter() {
public void onKeyDown(Widget sender, char keyCode, int modifiers)
{
Window.alert("key down "+keyCode);
}

public void onKeyPress(Widget sender, char keyCode, int
modifiers) {
Window.alert("key pressed "+keyCode);
}

public void onKeyUp(Widget sender, char keyCode, int modifiers)
{
Window.alert("key up "+keyCode);
}
});

nseb

unread,
May 4, 2007, 11:09:52 AM5/4/07
to Google Web Toolkit
The release date for 1.4RC or a date for a new snapshot ?

param

unread,
May 22, 2007, 2:16:20 AM5/22/07
to Google Web Toolkit
When the latest version 1.4 is going to be released ?

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages