/core_ops*.c
/docs/packfile*.pod
/examples/assembly/benchmarks/gc*.pasm
/icu/source/data/mappings/ibm*.ucm
/icu/source/data/translit/t_Inter*.txt
/include/parrot/oplib/core_ops*.h
/languages/perl6/t/parser/similar*.[exp|pl]
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
my vote is NO. let us bury 8.3 very, very deep in the ground.
cheers,
Aldo
__END__
$_=q,just perl,,s, , another ,,s,$, hacker,,print;
DOS isn't an intended compilation target, no.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
d...@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
Not even djgpp?
--
Michael G. Schwern <sch...@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl Quality Assurance <per...@perl.org> Kwalitee Is Job One
The eye opening delightful morning taste of expired cheese bits in sour milk!
Hadn't planned on it. What advantage does it give over windows?
It'll compile C programs on a 386/SX, 20M of disk, 4megs of RAM and some
form of DOS.
Dunno if hardware that old is inside Parrot's scope.
--
Michael G. Schwern <sch...@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl Quality Assurance <per...@perl.org> Kwalitee Is Job One
Only mindless violence can raise my spirits now!
Gah, it's like AutoLoader all over again! Please, let's just forget about
building on systems that only support 8.3 or else we'll never be rid of
them! :)
-John
It's outside the scope. (I'm not sure if parrot can be built with
only 4M of RAM and 20M of disk...) If someone gets it going, great,
we'll do what we can to accommodate them, but I'll wait until someone
steps up to the plate and actually does it.