Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What happened to schemers.org?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Luigi Ballabio

unread,
Sep 17, 2002, 11:11:02 AM9/17/02
to
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:47:06 +0200, Luigi Ballabio wrote:

> Hi all,
> I just checked to site only to find out that it was taken over
> by the Dept. of CS at Brown. Is the old site still alive somewhere?
>
> Thanks,
> Luigi

Never mind, now it's as it used to be.
Must have been a glitch in the DNS.
Strange...

Bye,
Luigi

Luigi Ballabio

unread,
Sep 17, 2002, 10:47:06 AM9/17/02
to

Shriram Krishnamurthi

unread,
Sep 17, 2002, 11:53:53 AM9/17/02
to
Luigi Ballabio <luigi.b...@fastwebnet.it> writes:

> I just checked to site only to find out that it was taken over
> by the Dept. of CS at Brown. Is the old site still alive somewhere?

The Revolution has begun. The department has been taken over.
Comrade Shivers's helicopter will land on College Green at 3.14pm.
Deployment of the Underground begins soon thereafter. Lambda bandanas
will be available at the corner of Thayer and Waterman. Please remain
calm and nobody will get skewered on parentheses.

Oh, wait, sorry, that must have been a dream.

We seem to be having some virtual host problems. The domain is hosted
on the same server that administers www.cs.brown.edu, and the latter
is its default response, so when things go wrong, you get the Brown CS
home page content. I've notified our sys staff, and I expect it'll be
fixed asap.

Sorry about that.

Cmde. Shriram

Dorai Sitaram

unread,
Sep 17, 2002, 4:42:33 PM9/17/02
to
In article <w7d1y7s...@cs.brown.edu>,

Shriram Krishnamurthi <s...@cs.brown.edu> wrote:
>Luigi Ballabio <luigi.b...@fastwebnet.it> writes:
>
>> I just checked to site only to find out that it was taken over
>> by the Dept. of CS at Brown. Is the old site still alive somewhere?
>
>The Revolution has begun. The department has been taken over.
>Comrade Shivers's helicopter will land on College Green at 3.14pm.
>Deployment of the Underground begins soon thereafter. Lambda bandanas
>will be available at the corner of Thayer and Waterman. Please remain
>calm and nobody will get skewered on parentheses.

3.14 *pm*, huh? Underground types (once so strong and
dynamic) seem to be getting rather soft and lazy
these days.

Anton van Straaten

unread,
Sep 18, 2002, 2:06:36 AM9/18/02
to
Dorai Sitaram wrote:
> 3.14 *pm*, huh? Underground types (once so strong and
> dynamic) seem to be getting rather soft and lazy
> these days.
>

There's such a thing as being too eager, you know. You wouldn't want an
organization like the Underground to remain static, now, would you? That
might make them weak, and then they'd need a strict hand to recover the type
of discipline they're known for...

Joe Marshall

unread,
Sep 18, 2002, 10:32:48 AM9/18/02
to

Maybe the plans have shouldn't have been finalized.
There is a lot of collective finger-pointing.

Charlton Wilbur

unread,
Sep 18, 2002, 3:13:59 PM9/18/02
to
>>>>> "DS" == Dorai Sitaram <ds...@goldshoe.gte.com> writes:

DS> 3.14 *pm*, huh? Underground types (once so strong and
DS> dynamic) seem to be getting rather soft and lazy these days.

Hey, what's wrong with doing something as soon as you get out of bed?

Charlton

MJ Ray

unread,
Sep 18, 2002, 6:32:49 PM9/18/02
to
Joe Marshall <j...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> Maybe the plans have shouldn't have been finalized.
> There is a lot of collective finger-pointing.

Please, this is exceptionally short. I think it's elaboration time.

Joe Marshall

unread,
Sep 19, 2002, 9:08:49 AM9/19/02
to
MJ Ray <markj...@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> writes:

> Joe Marshall <j...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> > Maybe the plans have shouldn't have been finalized.
> > There is a lot of collective finger-pointing.
>
> Please, this is exceptionally short.

Damn, you caught me. But you raise an important point.

> I think it's elaboration time.

Perhaps, but this message may be read by people who, shall we say,
`don't exercise proper hygiene' and I don't want them to take anything
out of context.

Jens Axel Søgaard

unread,
Sep 19, 2002, 9:56:58 AM9/19/02
to

Come on, get real. This imaginary non-hygienic audience of yours,
must for a number of complex reasons exists only in your memory.
I'll iterate: A statement like that, requires way more exactness of
the writer.

--
Jens Axel Søgaard
Macros and cheese for dinner

Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]

unread,
Sep 19, 2002, 10:29:57 AM9/19/02
to
>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Marshall <j...@ccs.neu.edu> writes:

Joe> MJ Ray <markj...@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> writes:

>> Joe Marshall <j...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> > Maybe the plans have shouldn't have been finalized.
>> > There is a lot of collective finger-pointing.
>>
>> Please, this is exceptionally short.

Joe> Damn, you caught me. But you raise an important point.

>> I think it's elaboration time.

Joe> Perhaps, but this message may be read by people who, shall we say,
Joe> `don't exercise proper hygiene' and I don't want them to take anything
Joe> out of context.

Too late. Goodbye, Mr. Marshall.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Joe Marshall

unread,
Sep 19, 2002, 11:42:09 AM9/19/02
to
"Jens Axel Søgaard" <use...@soegaard.net> writes:

> Joe Marshall wrote:
> > MJ Ray <markj...@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
> >> Joe Marshall <j...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> >>> Maybe the plans have shouldn't have been finalized.
> >>> There is a lot of collective finger-pointing.
> >>
> >> Please, this is exceptionally short.
> >
> > Damn, you caught me. But you raise an important point.
> >
> >> I think it's elaboration time.
> >
> > Perhaps, but this message may be read by people who,
> > shall we say, `don't exercise proper hygiene' and I don't
> > want them to take anything out of context.
>
> Come on, get real. This imaginary non-hygienic audience of yours,
> must for a number of complex reasons exists only in your memory.

You're the one that's irrational. I have been continuously
misinterpreted by those that lack hygiene. Scoff if you must, but
being discrete now will pay off in the future with a dividend of some
magnitude.

> I'll iterate: A statement like that, requires way more exactness of
> the writer.

Curse you! And curse you again! You have reduced me to expressions
of the most primitive type.

0 new messages