Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Statistical Evidence of Bruce Richman's Senile Dementia

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Arny Krueger

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 6:59:37 AM12/12/03
to
"Bruce J. Richman" <bjri...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031211161545...@mb-m17.aol.com

> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
> Licensed Psychologist

Notice that Richman is so insecure and so jealous of dominance over RAO that
he feels compelled to post his credentials on RAO quite often.

Google estimates that Bruce Richman has posted this information
approximately 636 times. The first post was August 16, 1998 or 5 years and
4 months ago. That's 64 months ago.

Therefore statistics show that Bruce Richman posts his credentials an
average of 10 times a month. That means that Bruce Richman is so insecure
and so jealous of dominance over RAO that he has to post his credentials on
the average about once every 3 days.

I guess poor old Bruce Richman forgets who he is and has to remind himself
and the rest of us of who he is, on the average of once every three days.
That would appear to indicate a serious state of senile dementia.

There is in fact no relevance of this information to the readers of the
rec.audio.opinion newsgroup. If Bruce Richman were an audio dealer or an
audio engineer or an audio writer, then this would be relevant. But he's
not, he's just a Psychologist. What does that have to do with audio?

Furthermore, there are a number of people who are audio dealers or audio
engineers or audio writers who post here and rarely if ever post anything
about their credentials. Thus, we see that Bruce Richman is posting
irrelevant information of a kind that normal people don't post, even when it
is relevant. This constitutes further evidence that Bruce Richman has severe
mental problems and extreme difficulties forming normal relationships with
other people.

Powell

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 10:18:37 AM12/12/03
to

"Arny Krueger" wrote

<SNIP DEHUMANIZING QUACKING>

Can't you find anything better to do with your free time or
the time your employer pays you for?

George M. Middius

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 10:27:06 AM12/12/03
to

Powell said to Shit-for-Brains:

> <SNIP DEHUMANIZING QUACKING>
>
> Can't you find anything better to do with your free time or
> the time your employer pays you for?

"Employer"? Krooger? And here I thought you never told a joke.

Arny Krueger

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 10:33:08 AM12/12/03
to
"Powell" <nos...@noquacking.com> wrote in message
news:vtjn4js...@corp.supernews.com

Given the level of personal insight you've demonstrated around here for
years, I'd bet that you don't realize how applicable this question is to
you, Powell.


Powell

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 11:26:59 AM12/12/03
to

"Arny Krueger" wrote

> > "Arny Krueger" wrote
> >
> > <SNIP DEHUMANIZING QUACKING>
> >
> > Can't you find anything better to do with your free time or
> > the time your employer pays you for?
>
> Given the level of personal insight you've demonstrated
> around here for years, I'd bet that you don't realize how
> applicable this question is to you, Powell.
>

Hehehe... you're right, I’m not a mind reader or qualified
to give a medical opinion on your abnormal psychology,
unlike Bruce.

I’m troubled with the hate you continuously spread over
this board like mud onto others. Your mind set is *wanting
the world to change then I’ll (Arny) will change*. You are an
embittered man locked into an unending struggle (behavior
pattern) with your unhappiness. I can only empathize for
your self-imposed predicament and offer you my
understanding. Nothing will change until you gain some
insight into your own behavior and unhappiness, none of
which will happen here, Arny.

Arny Krueger

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 11:37:46 AM12/12/03
to
"Powell" <nos...@noquacking.com> wrote in message
news:vtjr03m...@corp.supernews.com

> "Arny Krueger" wrote
>
>>> "Arny Krueger" wrote
>>>
>>> <SNIP DEHUMANIZING QUACKING>
>>>
>>> Can't you find anything better to do with your free time or
>>> the time your employer pays you for?
>>
>> Given the level of personal insight you've demonstrated
>> around here for years, I'd bet that you don't realize how
>> applicable this question is to you, Powell.
>>
> Hehehe... you're right, I'm not a mind reader or qualified
> to give a medical opinion on your abnormal psychology,
> unlike Bruce.
>
> I'm troubled with the hate you continuously spread over
> this board like mud onto others.

Yes Powell, you've never said a disparaging word about me in your life, not
even one. And Bruce Richman would never lower himself to make a personal
attack on anybody.

>Your mind set is *wanting
> the world to change then I'll (Arny) will change*.

Talk about mind reading!

LOL!

>You are an
> embittered man locked into an unending struggle (behavior
> pattern) with your unhappiness.

That's why I'm sitting here smiling. I'm sooo darn unhappy! Ohhh, am I
unhappy!

LOL!

> I can only empathize for
> your self-imposed predicament and offer you my
> understanding.

Which this post of yours gives copious evidence of, Powell.

> Nothing will change until you gain some
> insight into your own behavior and unhappiness, none of
> which will happen here, Arny.

Letsee Powell, people like you make post after post about what a terrible
person I am, and I respond to a few of them with tart observations about the
probable state of their minds. That makes me an even more horrible person
and oh-by-the-way terribly abnormal.

OK, I've got it. Thanks for sharing!

;-)


Robert Morein

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 11:58:04 AM12/12/03
to

"Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:WvCdnZ-rJKu...@comcast.com...

> "Bruce J. Richman" <bjri...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20031211161545...@mb-m17.aol.com
>
> > Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
> > Licensed Psychologist
>
> Notice that Richman is so insecure and so jealous of dominance over RAO
that
> he feels compelled to post his credentials on RAO quite often.
>
> Google estimates that Bruce Richman has posted this information
> approximately 636 times. The first post was August 16, 1998 or 5 years
and
> 4 months ago. That's 64 months ago.
>
> Therefore statistics show that Bruce Richman posts his credentials an
> average of 10 times a month. That means that Bruce Richman is so insecure
> and so jealous of dominance over RAO that he has to post his credentials
on
> the average about once every 3 days.
>
No, Arny, he keeps posting his credentials because you keep forgetting them!


Robert Morein

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 11:59:03 AM12/12/03
to

"Powell" <nos...@noquacking.com> wrote in message
news:vtjr03m...@corp.supernews.com...
That's the spirit, Powell! Kick Arny in the nuts!


Robert Morein

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 12:00:02 PM12/12/03
to

"Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:roadnUd7HI3...@comcast.com...
No, that's not it.
It has to do with your dictatorial urge to impose ***BAD SCIENCE*** on this
group.


Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 1:38:37 PM12/12/03
to
Arny Krueger wrote:

The above desperate psychotic blather of RAO's most widely hated and despised
poster simply illustrates how delusional, the pathological liar and libeler
Krueger really is. As with all of his posts, the fabrication never cease.

So, I guess it's time to say the following:

I have not read what the compulsive liar, Kreuger, has written above. There
is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well.

State tuned for another chapter in the never-ending saga of Krueger's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 1:40:16 PM12/12/03
to
Powerll wrote:

Perhaps he think that delusional posting will make him rich. Either that,, or
he's planning to rewrite the classic text called "How To Lie With Statistics"

Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 1:47:00 PM12/12/03
to
Powell wrote:


>"Arny Krueger" wrote
>
>> > "Arny Krueger" wrote
>> >
>> > <SNIP DEHUMANIZING QUACKING>
>> >
>> > Can't you find anything better to do with your free time or
>> > the time your employer pays you for?
>>
>> Given the level of personal insight you've demonstrated
>> around here for years, I'd bet that you don't realize how
>> applicable this question is to you, Powell.
>>
>Hehehe... you're right, I’m not a mind reader or qualified
>to give a medical opinion on your abnormal psychology,
>unlike Bruce.
>

Hi, Powell. You realize that Krueger will no doubt parse your sentence as part
of his debating trade deceptions to focus on the term "mind reader", don't you?
:)

Just a minor correction is called for. I'm not a physician and therefore don't
give medical opinions. Of course, there are other types of opinions I am
qualified to give. At least, the Broward County (Ft. Lauderdale area)
criminal justice system thought so several years ago, when I was on a list of
psychologists and psychiatrists that made judgments on both the competence and
sanity of those awaiting trial for various criminal offenses. :)

>I’m troubled with the hate you continuously spread over
>this board like mud onto others. Your mind set is *wanting
>the world to change then I’ll (Arny) will change*. You are an
>embittered man locked into an unending struggle (behavior
>pattern) with your unhappiness. I can only empathize for
>your self-imposed predicament and offer you my
>understanding. Nothing will change until you gain some
>insight into your own behavior and unhappiness, none of
>which will happen here, Arny.
>
>
>

Well stated.


Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 1:50:53 PM12/12/03
to
Robert Morein wrote:

Quite so.

Krueger appears to suffer from Waldheimer's Disease. When the former
secretary-general of the UN was asked what he did during World War II, he
seemed to forget.

Michael McKelvy

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 2:22:51 PM12/12/03
to

"Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:WvCdnZ-rJKu...@comcast.com...
What's the first post he made on RAO and how long did it take before the
unprovoked ad-hominem attacks began?


Michael McKelvy

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 2:36:06 PM12/12/03
to

"Bruce J. Richman" <bjri...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031212133837...@mb-m11.aol.com...

Richman really is.

Widely ridiculed by his own peers, he never ceases to offend those with a
modicum of good taste. Making pointless personal attacks, like the one in
the Julian Hirsch thread, he continues to think he is witty or relevant,
when in fact he has no life, no practice and no credibility.

His utter cowardice at refusing to answer why he made the above referenced
attack, his further claim that he doesn't read the posts he responds to are
further evidence of his desparation to take no responsability for HIS OWN
deplorable behavior.

To behave in the way he does, and to give tacit approval of the sickening
behavior by others, aimed at Arny Kreuger, demonstrate his clear disdain for
his alleged occupational code of ethics and simple decency.

You are a coward, a liar, and a fraud.


Marc Phillips

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 2:42:09 PM12/12/03
to
Arny said:

>"Bruce J. Richman" <bjri...@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:20031211161545...@mb-m17.aol.com
>
>> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
>> Licensed Psychologist

>Notice that Richman is so insecure and so jealous of dominance over RAO that
>he feels compelled to post his credentials on RAO quite often.

God, you're an idiot. Dr. Richman has to do this because Internet geeks such
as yourself constantly challenge his credentials. That, of course, is because
Internet geeks such as yourself usually lack credentials in the first place.

Boon

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 2:50:21 PM12/12/03
to
>From: "Michael McKelvy" DESK...@peoplepc.com
>Date: 12/12/2003 2:22 PM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <vtk56es...@corp.supernews.com>

I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is


no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post

as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never-ending saga of McKelvy's


"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 2:51:20 PM12/12/03
to
>From: "Michael McKelvy" DESK...@peoplepc.com
>Date: 12/12/2003 2:36 PM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <vtk5vb...@corp.supernews.com>

I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is


no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post

as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never-ending saga of McKelvy's


"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist


Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 3:00:46 PM12/12/03
to
Mr. Phillips wrote:

Indeed, delusional hatred and jealous has provoked document liars like Krueger
and McKelvy to engage in a 7 year history of libel, character assassination and
delusional fabrications about my academic, experiential, and professional
background.

Actually, I don't have to sign my name this way, and generally do not do so,
except when encountering new attempts at libel by these two pathetic,
delusional misfits.

Compulsive liar, Krueger, has recently tried to llie with statistics (another
one of his routine debating trade deceptions) by publishing alleged statistic
of how many times I've signed my name in the manner in which I'm legally
entitled to do so. Of course, what this transparent charlatan failed to do was
publish the number of times I have simply signed my name "Bruce J. Richman".

Therefore, even his delusional fabrications have become so transparent, that
they just provide us all with more evidence of his basic inabvility to tell the
truth.

As an other amusing, but very telling example of this compulsive liar's
hopelessness, Krueger recently published a "list of unprovoked personal
attacks" - or so he claimed that I had made against him. Gess what? The first
post on the list actually contains a discussion of the work of Daniel Lanois
(producer of Emmuylou Harris' Wreckling Ball CD and other items). Needless to
say, there was never any mention of Krueger in the post.
Therefore, the only possible explanations I can see were (1) he was
deliberately and consciously lying again, or (2) his paranoid delusional system
interfered with his ability to post factual information.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Bruce J. Richman

Arny Krueger

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 3:39:52 PM12/12/03
to
"Bruce J. Richman" <bjri...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031212134700...@mb-m11.aol.com

>> I'm troubled with the hate you continuously spread over
>> this board like mud onto others. Your mind set is *wanting
>> the world to change then I'll (Arny) will change*. You are an
>> embittered man locked into an unending struggle (behavior
>> pattern) with your unhappiness. I can only empathize for
>> your self-imposed predicament and offer you my
>> understanding. Nothing will change until you gain some
>> insight into your own behavior and unhappiness, none of
>> which will happen here, Arny.

> Well stated.

Compared to your repetitive sing-song posts Richman, its a real piece of
art.


Arny Krueger

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 3:42:15 PM12/12/03
to
"Marc Phillips" <vinyl...@aol.comm> wrote in message
news:20031212144209...@mb-m15.aol.com

> Arny said:
>
>> "Bruce J. Richman" <bjri...@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:20031211161545...@mb-m17.aol.com
>>
>>> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
>>> Licensed Psychologist
>
>> Notice that Richman is so insecure and so jealous of dominance over
>> RAO that he feels compelled to post his credentials on RAO quite
>> often.
>
> God, you're an idiot.

I'm not God.

> Dr. Richman has to do this because Internet
> geeks such as yourself constantly challenge his credentials.

Really? So Phillips I can quote you as saying that Richman's credentials
have been challenged 600+ times?

LOL!

> That,
> of course, is because Internet geeks such as yourself usually lack
> credentials in the first place.

Tell us about your credentials, Phillips. Remember, if you don't claim to
have any, we know for sure that you are an Internet geek, in accordance with
your own logic.

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 3:51:06 PM12/12/03
to
Arny Krueger wrote:

I have not read what the compulsive liar, Kreuger, has written above. There


is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well.

State tuned for another chapter in the never-ending saga of Krueger's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Bruce J. Richman

Michael McKelvy

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 4:03:53 PM12/12/03
to

"Marc Phillips" <vinyl...@aol.comm> wrote in message
news:20031212144209...@mb-m15.aol.com...

Perhaps we should hire an "Internet Detective" (snigger) to find out who BJ
really is.


Marc Phillips

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 4:51:20 PM12/12/03
to
Arny said:

>"Marc Phillips" <vinyl...@aol.comm> wrote in message
>news:20031212144209...@mb-m15.aol.com
>> Arny said:
>>
>>> "Bruce J. Richman" <bjri...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>> news:20031211161545...@mb-m17.aol.com
>>>
>>>> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
>>>> Licensed Psychologist
>>
>>> Notice that Richman is so insecure and so jealous of dominance over
>>> RAO that he feels compelled to post his credentials on RAO quite
>>> often.
>>
>> God, you're an idiot.
>
>I'm not God.

I didn't say you were. But I'll include this in my letter to Rev. Wick.

>
>> Dr. Richman has to do this because Internet
>> geeks such as yourself constantly challenge his credentials.
>
>Really? So Phillips I can quote you as saying that Richman's credentials
>have been challenged 600+ times?

No, because I never said that.

>
>LOL!
>
>> That,
>> of course, is because Internet geeks such as yourself usually lack
>> credentials in the first place.
>
>Tell us about your credentials, Phillips. Remember, if you don't claim to
>have any, we know for sure that you are an Internet geek, in accordance with
>your own logic.
>

What an idiotic argument. What do my credentials have to do with Dr. Richman
signing his posts the way he does? The truth is, I've beaten you here, so
you're hoping to reduce you losses by bringing up something else.

And tell me what my definition of an Internet geek is. And back it up with a
Google reference.

Boon

Marc Phillips

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 4:53:01 PM12/12/03
to
McKelvy said:

Or, you could pull your head out of your ass, go into the Google archives, and
find the post where Dr. Richman provides all of the info one needs to verify
his credentials.

Boon

Powell

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 5:52:17 PM12/12/03
to

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote

> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> >Compared to your repetitive sing-song posts Richman, its
> >a real piece of art.
> >

> State tuned for another chapter in the never-ending saga of
> Krueger's "Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"
>

No doubt. Freud wrote papers to the profession (students)
in which he said don’t even bother with anyone over the age
of 35. There is just to much work to do... to much to take
apart and there is no energy left to put the pieces back together
again. Imagine the couch time required to change a single
attribute of Arny's inappropriate behavior. A real *cash cow*
for a psychoanalysis... assuming the analyst didn't hang
himself in the process :).

Powell

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 6:12:49 PM12/12/03
to

"Robert Morein" wrote

> That's the spirit, Powell! Kick Arny in the nuts!
>

These are the words of a man chasing after gopher
holes (Brian) for the last three years in Australia.
Please choose any number under the mental health
heading in the yellow phone book and dial, Robert :).

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 6:57:03 PM12/12/03
to
>From: "Michael McKelvy" DESK...@peoplepc.com
>Date: 12/12/2003 4:03 PM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <vtkb3vr...@corp.supernews.com>

I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is


no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post

as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never-ending saga of McKelvy's


"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist


Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 6:59:53 PM12/12/03
to
Mr. Phillips wrote:

I'm not so sure that his severe case of cephalic-anal inversion, coupled with
folie a deux (with Krueger), would permit that.
IOW, his desperate need to try and get others to believe his paranoid,
libelous, totally irrational ravings prevents him from knowing anything
factual.

Bruce J. Richman

Lionel

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 7:03:43 PM12/12/03
to
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Bruce, somewhere Arnold Krueger is right your titles and your typical US
cutomer-caution-forms are very costly from a bandwidth point of view !
:-)

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 7:03:45 PM12/12/03
to
Mr. Phillips wrote:

Krueger's frequent misrepresentation of what others have actually said is a
matter of Google record. And his latest example of a "Google referene" for his
transparent lying includes listing a post re. the music of Daniel Lanois in
which I participated. His name was obviously never mentioned, yet Krueger
claimed this represented one of many unprovoiked personal attacks by me against
him.

Maybe, of course, he has own, very special, personal edition of Google that is
written in invisible ink, or is like the Mission Impossible tapes that
self-destruct after 10 seconds.

LOL !!

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.

Lionel

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 7:05:47 PM12/12/03
to
Lionel a écrit :

...Yes I know I have posted 45 pages of Karl Marx's manifest in french
version.

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 7:11:11 PM12/12/03
to
Powell wrote:

Well, if Woody Allen's analyst ever becomes available, maybe Krueger can become
his 2nd long-term patient. :)

I just hope he's not a fan of Broadway musicals such as Man of La Mancha.
References to "The Impossible Dream" might be countertherapeutic.

Michael McKelvy

unread,
Dec 13, 2003, 3:13:55 PM12/13/03
to

"Marc Phillips" <vinyl...@aol.comm> wrote in message
news:20031212165301...@mb-m01.aol.com...

Sorry, I don't buy the internet detective shit and I don't buy Quackenbush's
either.

In the end it doesn't even matter if he really is who he says he is, because
at the end of any day on RAO, he's still a disgusting pig, a liar and
unprofessional pain in the ass.

No wonder you like him.


Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 13, 2003, 3:26:22 PM12/13/03
to
>From: "Michael McKelvy" DESK...@peoplepc.com
>Date: 12/13/2003 3:13 PM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <vtmt3s5...@corp.supernews.com>

I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is


no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".


Btruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Marc Phillips

unread,
Dec 13, 2003, 6:32:16 PM12/13/03
to
McKelvy said:

That's because when it comes to picking between your agenda and the truth,
you'll always pick your agenda.

>
>In the end it doesn't even matter if he really is who he says he is, because
>at the end of any day on RAO, he's still a disgusting pig, a liar and
>unprofessional pain in the ass.

The same can be said about you, except for the fact that we've caught you
lying, and you have yet to prove Dr. Richman has.

>
>No wonder you like him.

I like him, and you like a pathological liar and known pedophile named Arny
Krueger. To each his own.

Boon

S888Wheel

unread,
Dec 13, 2003, 7:32:37 PM12/13/03
to
Arny said

<<

Notice that Richman is so insecure and so jealous of dominance over RAO that
he feels compelled to post his credentials on RAO quite often.

And yet some people still insist he isn't a licensed psychologist. You demand
proof, you deny the facts after proof has been provided and now you whine about
excessiveness. This is a classic case of a forked tongue.

Arny said

<<
Google estimates that Bruce Richman has posted this information
approximately 636 times. The first post was August 16, 1998 or 5 years and
4 months ago. That's 64 months ago.

Oh, now google is reliable. When estimates of you posting 90,000 or more times
on Usenet were cited you whined about how unreliable such estimates were.

Arny said

<<
Therefore statistics show that Bruce Richman posts his credentials an
average of 10 times a month.


"Statistics" also show that you spend an enormous amount of time on Usenent.


Arny said

<< That means that Bruce Richman is so insecure
and so jealous of dominance over RAO that he has to post his credentials on


the average about once every 3 days.


And what does it mean for someone to have 90,000 or more posts on Usenet? LOL.

Arny said

<<
There is in fact no relevance of this information to the readers of the
rec.audio.opinion newsgroup.

There is no relevance to audio when you demand that people give you personal
information and then demand that it be proven. What relevance did asking Marc
Phillips prove his mother in law passed away have to audio? Hypocrite. Dr.
Richman has felt compelled to prove he is who he is because of jerks like you
making unreasonable challenges to his reasonable claim and then demanding
proof.

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 13, 2003, 8:03:19 PM12/13/03
to
Mr. Phillips wrote:

Agreed. And his agenda is driven by bitterness, hatred, paranoia and
delusional thinking. Oh - and lest I forget, fabrications and libel.


>>
>>In the end it doesn't even matter if he really is who he says he is, because
>>at the end of any day on RAO, he's still a disgusting pig, a liar and
>>unprofessional pain in the ass.
>
>The same can be said about you, except for the fact that we've caught you
>lying, and you have yet to prove Dr. Richman has.
>
>>
>>No wonder you like him.
>
>I like him, and you like a pathological liar and known pedophile named Arny
>Krueger. To each his own.
>
>Boon
>
>
>

Thank you, Mr. Phillips :)


Bruce J.Richman, Ph.D.

George M. Middius

unread,
Dec 13, 2003, 8:43:35 PM12/13/03
to

S888Wheel said to Shit-for-Brains:

> "Statistics" also show that you spend an enormous amount of time on Usenent.

Ordinary counting also shows that.

For the benefit of RAO as a whole, I spent a few minutes querying
Google Groups about the severity of the Krooger infection. Because
the search engine prefers to sample the number posts meeting your
criteria and then extrapolate a total (rather than actually counting
all of the posts), I had to specify rather short time frames.
Anyway, for the period June 1997 through December 1999, the total
count of Krooger's Usenet posts is (drumroll) ......

25,399

That's for a period of 30 months (2½ years). Almost all of them were
under the nom de plume "Arny Krüger". Krooger switched to the
current deceptive spelling at a subsequent point, but I haven't
pinpointed it yet.

As a side note, I estimate that Krooger made approximately 400
"enemies" during that 30-month period. That and the 24000+ posts
must be a pair of unassailable records for posterity. ;-)


Anybody who wants the actual data of Krooger's profligate
time-wasting can email me.

Arny Krueger

unread,
Dec 13, 2003, 10:23:03 PM12/13/03
to
"George M. Middius" <Spam-...@resistance.org> wrote in message
news:thfntvk2ish5ihnpt...@4ax.com

> S888Wheel said to Shit-for-Brains:
>
>> "Statistics" also show that you spend an enormous amount of time on
>> Usenent.
>
> Ordinary counting also shows that.
>
> For the benefit of RAO as a whole, I spent a few minutes querying
> Google Groups about the severity of the Krooger infection. Because
> the search engine prefers to sample the number posts meeting your
> criteria and then extrapolate a total (rather than actually counting
> all of the posts), I had to specify rather short time frames.
> Anyway, for the period June 1997 through December 1999, the total
> count of Krooger's Usenet posts is (drumroll) ......

> 25,399

> That's for a period of 30 months (2½ years).

That's about 10,000 a year, or 833 per month or 27 per day. Most posts take
me a minute or two, so this represents maybe an hour or two, more or less
worth of effort per day.

>Almost all of them were
> under the nom de plume "Arny Krüger". Krooger switched to the
> current deceptive spelling at a subsequent point, but I haven't
> pinpointed it yet.

Both spellings, Krüger and Krueger are legitimate. Krüger is the German
spelling of my last name which is legitimate because I am almost entirely of
German descent. The current so-called deceptive spelling of Krueger is in
fact what shows up on my driver's license.

> As a side note, I estimate that Krooger made approximately 400
> "enemies" during that 30-month period. That and the 24000+ posts
> must be a pair of unassailable records for posterity. ;-)

The 400 enemies would be a figment of the fertile (as in full-of-crap)
Middius imagination.

> Anybody who wants the actual data of Krooger's profligate
> time-wasting can email me.

Kinda difficult to do as this post was made under using an email address
(Spam-...@resistance.org) that is either false or incomplete or both.
Typical of Middius' congenital dishonesty or stupidity or both.


Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 13, 2003, 10:44:14 PM12/13/03
to
Scott Wheeler:

>Arny said
>
><<
>
>Notice that Richman is so insecure and so jealous of dominance over RAO that
>he feels compelled to post his credentials on RAO quite often.
>
>And yet some people still insist he isn't a licensed psychologist. You demand
>proof, you deny the facts after proof has been provided and now you whine
>about
>excessiveness. This is a classic case of a forked tongue.
>

He has a 7 year history of pathological lying re. my identity, professional
activites, credentials, etc. He has smeared numerous separate indivduals on
RAO and libeled many, as you know.
Krueger has never been interested in facts unless they can be twisted or
manipulated into supporting his anti-individual preference, anti-tube,
anti-vinyl agenda.
This pathological liar claimed that a post in which I talked about the music of
Daniel Lanois was an unprovoked personal attack against him, despite the fact
that his name was never mentioned. Since he was caught in this obvious lie, he
never said another word about his obvious attempt to fuol the RAO public by
posting a phony Google reference that he hoped and prayed that nobody would
actually read. This is the type of deception and fraud that he has displayed
many times on RAO.


>Arny said
>
><<
>Google estimates that Bruce Richman has posted this information
>approximately 636 times. The first post was August 16, 1998 or 5 years and
>4 months ago. That's 64 months ago.
>
>
>Oh, now google is reliable. When estimates of you posting 90,000 or more
>times
>on Usenet were cited you whined about how unreliable such estimates were.
>

Krueger, in his usual deceptive attempt to fool the publid by creating a
deceptive statistical picture, fails to mention the number of Google references
where I have signed my name without attaching my degree and/or profession why
is that? It is because Krueger is trying to lie with statistics. HIs efforts
to deceive the RAO readers are quite transparent, of course, and despicable.

Several years ago, I'm not sure how many, there was a Ph.D. in either physics
or engineering from M.I.T. who posted on RAO. I think his name was Coser or
Cover (I'd have to look it up). As we all might predict, Krueger attempted to
smear him by questioning his credentials and demanding proof. Krueger's envy
of individuals who have actually achieved a level of academic attainment he
could never aproach parallels his envy and jealousy of those that actually know
what they are talking about and tell the truth, whether it be in psychology or
audio. We have no need to present phony Google references, lie with
statistics, start libelous attack threads, or engage in the numerous types of
delusional fabrications that Krueger routinely uses on RAO.


>Arny said
>
><<
>Therefore statistics show that Bruce Richman posts his credentials an
>average of 10 times a month.
>
>
>"Statistics" also show that you spend an enormous amount of time on Usenent.
>

See my comments above about how Krueger attempts to lie with statistics. In
addition to deliberately omitting the number of times I have signed my name
without additional degree or credentials, pathological liar Krueger apparently
does not realize that statistical averages tell people nothing about actual
usage patterns from month to month. Just another form of statistical
manipulation and lying aboiut data that is typical of this pathological liar
and purveyor of fraudulent information.

It is no wonder that Robert Morein has correctly evaluated him as a "Bad
Scientist". His attempts to lie with statistics would have the editorial board
of any self-respecting peer-rreview journal thrown his quasi-scientific
"analysis" in the trash heap very quickly.

>
>Arny said
>
><< That means that Bruce Richman is so insecure
>and so jealous of dominance over RAO that he has to post his credentials on
>the average about once every 3 days.
>
>

See above comments about Krueger's deliberate lying with statistics.

>
>And what does it mean for someone to have 90,000 or more posts on Usenet?
>LOL.
>
>Arny said
>
><<
>There is in fact no relevance of this information to the readers of the
>rec.audio.opinion newsgroup.
>
>There is no relevance to audio when you demand that people give you personal
>information and then demand that it be proven. What relevance did asking Marc
>Phillips prove his mother in law passed away have to audio? Hypocrite. Dr.
>Richman has felt compelled to prove he is who he is because of jerks like you
>making unreasonable challenges to his reasonable claim and then demanding
>proof.
>
>
>

Documented libeler and pathological liar Krueger has been found to be involved
in more nasty interpersonal conflicts, and has smeared and defamed more
specific RAO posters, as documented Ed Shain nad others, than other poster in
the history of RAO. Actually, I don't really feel compelled to post anything
to deal with Krueger's paranoid, libelous fabrications. It is quite clear that
other than his parasitic and equally disturbed supporter, McKelvy, nobody
believes his nonsensical, delusional, false claims.

However, it certainly is gratifying to confront them with the facts and make
fools of them at every opportunity. A couple of sadistic, delusional liars
like these 2 zealous misfits deserve all the ridicule, scorn, and revulsion
that about 99% of RAO's posters that comment on their garbage have shown.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Bruce J. Richman

George M. Middius

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 12:17:13 AM12/14/03
to

George M. Middius said:

> For the benefit of RAO as a whole, I spent a few minutes querying
> Google Groups about the severity of the Krooger infection. Because
> the search engine prefers to sample the number posts meeting your
> criteria and then extrapolate a total (rather than actually counting
> all of the posts), I had to specify rather short time frames.
> Anyway, for the period June 1997 through December 1999, the total
> count of Krooger's Usenet posts is (drumroll) ......
>
> 25,399
>
> That's for a period of 30 months (2½ years).


I've just finished getting the count for 2000. In the process, I
discovered when DeceptoBorg sleazily altered the spelling of his
name, presumably in order to hide how many -- how very, very very
many -- Usenet posts he was making while his poor wife was out
earning money to pay for the mortgage, the Villager, and Krooger's
addiction to Audio Krap. Shit-for-Brains made a few posts as
"Krueger" in January 2000, then went back to "Krüger" for three
months, and then settled on the more deceptive variant for the rest
of the year.

And the total volume of Kroodroppings for Annum MM is......

12692

I believe that says the Beast's addiction to Usenet intensified
since he began marauding here. From around 8,400 per month, Mr. Shit
ramped up his outputs to an average of 10,580. Way to go,
Mr. "Self-Employed Businessman". ;-)


George M. Middius

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 1:56:41 AM12/14/03
to

George M. Middius said:

> And the total volume of Kroodroppings for Annum MM is......
>
> 12692
>
> I believe that says the Beast's addiction to Usenet intensified
> since he began marauding here. From around 8,400 per month, Mr. Shit
> ramped up his outputs to an average of 10,580. Way to go,
> Mr. "Self-Employed Businessman". ;-)


oopsie.....

Make that 840 and 1058. Still a record, most likely.

MINe 109

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 9:13:31 AM12/14/03
to
In article <_JSdnVxoafS...@comcast.com>,
"Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote:

> "George M. Middius" <Spam-...@resistance.org> wrote in message
> news:thfntvk2ish5ihnpt...@4ax.com

> > Anybody who wants the actual data of Krooger's profligate


> > time-wasting can email me.
>
> Kinda difficult to do as this post was made under using an email address
> (Spam-...@resistance.org) that is either false or incomplete or both.
> Typical of Middius' congenital dishonesty or stupidity or both.

Or you could use the "Reply to" address.

Arny Krueger

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 9:43:01 AM12/14/03
to
"MINe 109" <smc...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote in message
news:smcatut-9C8342...@news-server-fe-1.texas.rr.com

Which is not part of the post text, requires that most people chase through
addtional windows to find, and has to be totally re-written.


George M. Middius

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 9:51:32 AM12/14/03
to

MINe 109 said to Shit-for-Brains:

> > > Anybody who wants the actual data of Krooger's profligate
> > > time-wasting can email me.

> > Kinda difficult to do as this post was made under using an email address
> > (Spam-...@resistance.org) that is either false or incomplete or both.
> > Typical of Middius' congenital dishonesty or stupidity or both.
>
> Or you could use the "Reply to" address.

Krooger would rather demonstrate his immense expertise in all
matters related to email.

MINe 109

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 9:52:52 AM12/14/03
to
In article <c9adnTbm0JU...@comcast.com>,
"Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote:

> "MINe 109" <smc...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote in message
> news:smcatut-9C8342...@news-server-fe-1.texas.rr.com
> > In article <_JSdnVxoafS...@comcast.com>,
> > "Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
> >> "George M. Middius" <Spam-...@resistance.org> wrote in message
> >> news:thfntvk2ish5ihnpt...@4ax.com
>
> >>> Anybody who wants the actual data of Krooger's profligate
> >>> time-wasting can email me.
>
> >> Kinda difficult to do as this post was made under using an email
> >> address (Spam-...@resistance.org) that is either false or
> >> incomplete or both. Typical of Middius' congenital dishonesty or
> >> stupidity or both.
>
> > Or you could use the "Reply to" address.
>
> Which is not part of the post text, requires that most people chase through
> addtional windows to find, and has to be totally re-written.

Odd. The "Reply to" appears in the original post display. As for
re-writing, that's easy enough for someone who wants to use the address.

It's also odd that you don't recognize a spam-blocking email address.

Stephen

George M. Middius

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 9:59:06 AM12/14/03
to

A funny thing happened on the way to the Hive....

Does anybody remember 2001 being considerably more peaceable than
the preceding years for RAO? I don't. Nonetheless, Shit-for-Brains
apparently gave Usenet a big break during that year. The count:

7831

Maybe all the other newsgroups Krooger has been known to pollute
received the benefit of reduced Kroofulness during '01. Oh well.

These 7831 Kroo-droppings were all labeled with the pseudonym
"Krueger" rather than the verifiable "Krüger". Despite this ongoing
campaign of deceptiveness, that much lower number appears to be
true. It's a weekly average of only 602. And there was no big hiatus
-- every month, Turdy posted between 400 and 800 times. Why don't I
remember those good old days of greatly reduced BorgSmugSnot? Does
anybody else have that impression?

MINe 109

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 10:08:17 AM12/14/03
to
In article <o9uotv0k9vgh545oq...@4ax.com>,

Maybe we were too busy slogging through Ferstler's immense verbiage to
notice.

Stephen

George M. Middius

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 10:12:52 AM12/14/03
to

MINe 109 said to Shit-for-Brains:

> > > Or you could use the "Reply to" address.


> >
> > Which is not part of the post text, requires that most people chase through
> > addtional windows to find, and has to be totally re-written.
>
> Odd. The "Reply to" appears in the original post display. As for
> re-writing, that's easy enough for someone who wants to use the address.

Normal adult humans (and most children, I'd guess) are able to use
their email clients' "Reply to" function. It's universally
accessible via a menu option, a button, or a keyboard shortcut.

Of course, this is Krooger we're talking about. The Beast has no
desire to email me; he just needs something to argue about.

> It's also odd that you don't recognize a spam-blocking email address.

I'll bet he makes a couple more of his fabled "two minute" posts to
argue about how difficult it would be to email me.

Bruce J. Richman

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 1:56:09 PM12/14/03
to
Stephen wrote:

That sounds like a reasonable theory. Besides, even those with verbal
diarrhea, may have periods when they become constipated.


Bruce J. Richman

MINe 109

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 5:53:05 PM12/14/03
to
In article <vavotv4r4rlopn3ef...@4ax.com>,

Speaking of the well-worn trail of Kroo, have you given thought to his
use of the word 'weirdness'? Back in the day it meant, "an activity of
which I disapprove' eg. listening to lps. Now it seems to mean "use of
irrefutable logic to counter a Kroo-argument".

Stephen

Nousaine

unread,
Dec 14, 2003, 9:18:00 PM12/14/03
to
"Arny Krueger" ar...@hotpop.com wrote:

>There is in fact no relevance of this information to the readers of the

>rec.audio.opinion newsgroup. If Bruce Richman were an audio dealer or an
>audio engineer or an audio writer, then this would be relevant. But he's
>not, he's just a Psychologist. What does that have to do with audio?
>

That qualifies him to join my Psycho-Acoustics Cult ...... sound for crazy
people.

0 new messages