since powerarchiver is now shareware which zipper should i use now

[uncc]

filzip
http://www.filzip.com/

or

UltimateZip

http://www.ultimatezip.com/

they both look good and have 99.9% of what powerarchiver

[JC]

Just stay with the last freeware version of PowerArchiver :)

[Tigers]

Yes, but it still has major bugs, that they kept saying ver 7.0 would fix,
like the add file(s) to zip feature that in fact replaces the old files in
the archive with the new ones.

--
Ciao, Tigers
http://go.to/tigers
http://www.tigers.3000.it
"JC" <spammenot...@goawaynow.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3b2fc50c...@news.orcon.net.nz...

[Allan Evans]

shehat...@yahoo.com (uncc) wrote in
news:9ebaf735.01061...@posting.google.com:

I didn't realise that PowerArchiver had gone shareware? I just had a look
around on their website, it it still says "freeware". Am I missing
something here?

--

[JC]

On 20 Jun 2001 13:49:14 +1000, all...@netscape.net (Allan Evans)
wrote:

Its in the forums

[Tigers]

Well, no!
If I click add within an existing archive and select *Update (and add)
files* I expect the new files to be stored in the archive together with the
old ones. This doesn't happen in ver 6.11, but works fine in ver 7.0 and in
Winzip.

--
Ciao, Tigers
http://go.to/tigers
http://www.tigers.3000.it

"PKC" <p...@pkm.pkm> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:Xns90C680E...@193.92.150.74...
> "Tigers" <x...@yyy.com> wrote in
> news:T2QX6.3645$Rq1.1...@news.infostrada.it:

>
> > Yes, but it still has major bugs, that they kept saying ver 7.0 would
> > fix, like the add file(s) to zip feature that in fact replaces the old
> > files in the archive with the new ones.
>

> Isn't that what it was supposed to do?
>
[snip]