Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

BCM review at The Armchair Empire

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Derek Smart (3000AD)

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 12:17:17ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to

Review : (7.3/10)

http://www.armchairempire.com/Reviews/PC%20Games/battlecruiser-millennium.htm

Previous Interview:

http://www.armchairempire.com/Interviews/derek-smart.htm


Derek Smart Ph.D.
Designer/Lead Developer
www.3000ad.com

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build
bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce
bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Rich Cook

Butcher

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 1:36:09ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to
"Derek Smart (3000AD)" <dsm...@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:huagcu08htk872pb3...@4ax.com...

I'm not sure why you keep posting links to reviews of your game in this group.
Seems to me that everyone who is interested in the game is already aware of your
website and would have access to those links there. Posting them here just
fuels the flames don't you think? Again, I'm not at all sure but if I had to
guess, I'd say that you do this on purpose, using the old "any publicity is good
publicity". I hope you realize though that it comes across as extremely self
promoting and is considered spam by many - not only because the group is not
intended as an advertizing medium but also because it just fuels the same
flamewar that you you yourself have stated has destroyed this newsgroup.

--
"What a depressingly stupid machine."
Marvin, The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy


madkevin

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 2:10:41ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to

"Derek Smart (3000AD)" <dsm...@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:huagcu08htk872pb3...@4ax.com...
>
>
> Review : (7.3/10)
>
> http://www.armchairempire.com/Reviews/PC%20Games/battlecruiser-millennium.htm

Interestingly, one of your very own toadies pointed out that the screenshots that
accompany the article seem to be from the supposed XP1 expansion, rather than BCM.
Perhaps you'd like to mention that little gaffe to the Armchair Empire staff.

Kevin "Wouldn't Want People To Get The Wrong Idea" Cogliano


Bruce

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 4:56:03ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:17:17 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)"
<dsm...@pobox.com> wrote:

>
>
>Review : (7.3/10)
>
>http://www.armchairempire.com/Reviews/PC%20Games/battlecruiser-millennium.htm

Pity this review mentions the game is buggy, which you cannot fix and
doesnt mention you have dropped multiplayer
>
>Previous Interview:
>
>http://www.armchairempire.com/Interviews/derek-smart.htm
Typical Derek rant, full of his many lies!!!
>
>
>
>
>Derek Smart Ph.D.
You are a admitted Ph.D FRAUD!!!!

Allan Parent

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 5:03:51ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to
Hmmmm....so the reviewer doesn't even supply his own screenshots? Then he
doesn't even know that the screenshots are not from BCM? Yeah, that is a
credible review.

Allan

"madkevin" <madk...@golden.net> wrote in message
news:SFXx8.76009$QR1.2...@news20.bellglobal.com...

Nobody

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 8:05:22ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:17:17 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)" <dsm...@pobox.com>
wrote:

>Review : (7.3/10)
>
>http://www.armchairempire.com/Reviews/PC%20Games/battlecruiser-millennium.htm


LMAO!

PROS:
- A half-way good backstory


And screenshots from a different unreleased game?

Memnoch

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 8:13:54ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:17:17 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)" <dsm...@pobox.com>
wrote:

>
>

"Yeah, some buildings I could walk through but as BaM is funded without the
deep pockets of a major publisher, Iā€™m willing to let this slide. "

Why? For someone who can knock up a multplayer patch with ease and code clever
AI routines, surely collision detection should be a pushover. Apparently,
still not fixed it seems. I hope the reviewer doesn't mention this on your
forum, after all you can hardly boot out the only person who is giving you OK
reviews.

"Besides which, 3000AD is supporting BaM with regular patches and updates (one
of which is multiplayer). "

Which one was the multplayer one again? I guess I must have missed it. Oh, and
since when has the Sol system been transported into the middle of a nebulae?

Rico

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 8:28:49ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to

"Nobody" <jun...@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:uch6e1h...@corp.supernews.com...

Release date of Q4 2002? Maybe Derek should let his toady know that the game is
already out?


aggies

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 11:09:19ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to
The only positive review you could find was from some amateur game review
site that nobody's heard of before???


LOL go take a look at what they gave Black and White. hahahahaahahahah

Lance Art

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 11:55:04ā€ÆPM4/25/02
to
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:17:17 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)"
<dsm...@pobox.com> wrote:

>Review : (7.3/10)
>
>http://www.armchairempire.com/Reviews/PC%20Games/battlecruiser-millennium.htm

It's a desparate man who must cling to abysmally amateurish reviews to
prop up his product. Let's see now...

" Battlecruiser Millennium (BaM)" A game reviewer who isn't familiar
with the abbreviation used for the game. It's the sure mark of
quality!

"unfortunately not everyone will partake in the romp simply because 1)
they hate Derek Smart and 2) the learning curve is steep enough to be
considered an overhang" Yet the reviewer also goes on to say later
"But for some, boredom will set in." Perhaps there might be a third
reason?

"Besides which, 3000AD is supporting BaM with regular patches and

updates (one of which is multiplayer)." But then in the CONs mentions
"No multiplayer ā€“ yet". Well either there is a multi-player patch or
there isn't and right now there isn't!

"The lack of story got to me after a while because what was the
purpose of trying to change things when there was no real point ā€“ no
way to change an outcome?" And in the PROs metions "A half-way good
backstory" Exsqueeze me? Which is it?

And for a product that Derek claims runs fine, in the CONs we find
"Bugs". Hmmmm.....

Bill Huffman

unread,
Apr 26, 2002, 10:20:35ā€ÆAM4/26/02
to

"Lance Art" <l_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:v8jhcu8vkp923m9fp...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:17:17 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)"
> <dsm...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> >Review : (7.3/10)
> >
> >http://www.armchairempire.com/Reviews/PC%20Games/battlecruiser-millennium.htm
...

> And for a product that Derek claims runs fine, in the CONs we find
> "Bugs". Hmmmm.....

How could there be bugs? There's no mention of any bugs on the official user
forum (left after ruthless cleansing)?


noman

unread,
Apr 26, 2002, 4:30:36ā€ÆPM4/26/02
to

Actually "Computer Games" (Denny Atkin) gave BCM a fairly decent
score.

http://www.cgonline.com/reviews/btlcrusmil-01-r1.html

I am sure though Derek must have posted about that review in this ng
:)
--
Noman

Bruce

unread,
Apr 26, 2002, 5:59:53ā€ÆPM4/26/02
to
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:03:51 -0500, "Allan Parent"
<all...@nospam.charter.net> wrote:

>Hmmmm....so the reviewer doesn't even supply his own screenshots? Then he
>doesn't even know that the screenshots are not from BCM? Yeah, that is a
>credible review.
>
>Allan

The screenshots have now been changed to BCM shots, but have a look at
the 3rd picture, that is some clipping!!!

Derek Smart (3000AD)

unread,
Apr 26, 2002, 6:15:46ā€ÆPM4/26/02
to
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:56:03 +1000, Bruce <Br...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:17:17 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)"
><dsm...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Review : (7.3/10)
>>
>>http://www.armchairempire.com/Reviews/PC%20Games/battlecruiser-millennium.htm
>
>Pity this review mentions the game is buggy, which you cannot fix and
>doesnt mention you have dropped multiplayer

Hello Shirley aka Fabio aka Herbert Epsilon666 aka Dareksmart aka

Goodbye Shirley aka Fabio aka Herbert Epsilon666 aka Dareksmart aka

*plonk*

Derek Smart Ph.D.

Daniel Blakemore

unread,
Apr 26, 2002, 6:30:58ā€ÆPM4/26/02
to
Derek Smart (3000AD) <dsm...@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:5bkjcugt3lbsqb1ja...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:56:03 +1000, Bruce <Br...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Pity this review mentions the game is buggy, which you cannot fix and
> >doesnt mention you have dropped multiplayer
> Hello Shirley aka Fabio aka Herbert Epsilon666 aka Dareksmart aka
> Goodbye Shirley aka Fabio aka Herbert Epsilon666 aka Dareksmart aka
> *plonk*

Aww diddums, Dewek...did that nasty man upset you by pointing out what a
buggy POS your game is?

:)

--
Daniel Blakemore
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself" - Tom Paine


Bruce

unread,
Apr 26, 2002, 6:29:36ā€ÆPM4/26/02
to
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:15:46 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)"
<dsm...@pobox.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:56:03 +1000, Bruce <Br...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:17:17 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)"
>><dsm...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Review : (7.3/10)
>>>
>>>http://www.armchairempire.com/Reviews/PC%20Games/battlecruiser-millennium.htm
>>
>>Pity this review mentions the game is buggy, which you cannot fix and
>>doesnt mention you have dropped multiplayer
>
>Hello Shirley aka Fabio aka Herbert Epsilon666 aka Dareksmart aka
>
>Goodbye Shirley aka Fabio aka Herbert Epsilon666 aka Dareksmart aka
>
>*plonk*

Poor Derek, leaky kill file again!!
>
>Derek Smart Ph.D. Fraud

Dick Garage

unread,
Apr 27, 2002, 8:49:48ā€ÆAM4/27/02
to
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:15:46 -0400, "Derek Smart (3000AD)" <dsm...@pobox.com>
wrote:

>*plonk*


LOL, now when he slips up and refers to your posts he has to remember to pull
the "I saw it on google" stunt.

Derek you asshole.

--
" I can't help it if I possess a vastly superior intellect
and skillset than most. Its in my nature."" In case you were
wondering, yes, I'm a fucking genius.""I MADE ME."
"Know your place and BOW YOUR HEAD damnit!""..
remember, my comments are NOT designed to win
anyone over. I am me.

-Derek Smart, VE3D comment board, December 2001.

Bruce

unread,
Apr 27, 2002, 9:58:43ā€ÆPM4/27/02
to
I noticed that the BCM reviewer has changed the review, called it BCM
and added some words and is now registered at the Taco Palace and is
sucking up to Derek!!

Derek Smart (3000AD)

unread,
Apr 28, 2002, 9:45:30ā€ÆAM4/28/02
to
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:30:36 GMT, ZZZYYno_...@yahoo.com (noman)
wrote:

Its the same score that CGW gave and similar to all the other scores.
Reviews and scores are at www.3000ad.com/reviews/index.shtml

Bill Huffman

unread,
Apr 29, 2002, 2:10:11ā€ÆAM4/29/02
to

"Bruce" <Br...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6nlmcusdd7cc5idc8...@4ax.com...

> I noticed that the BCM reviewer has changed the review, called it BCM
> and added some words and is now registered at the Taco Palace and is
> sucking up to Derek!!

I'm pleased that another toady has found his proper place in life.


Shingen36

unread,
May 9, 2002, 11:15:46ā€ÆAM5/9/02
to
>Subject: Re: BCM review at The Armchair Empire
>From: "Bill Huffman" bhuf...@REMOVE-THISsan.rr.com
>Date: 4/29/02 1:10 AM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <7t5z8.72316$zN.37...@twister.socal.rr.com>

>I'm pleased that another toady has found his proper place in life.
>


Well I ain't a "toady" of Derek Smart by ANY stretch of the imagination..but I
am a member of the BC community..and IMHO, the guys suffers SEVERLY from a
MASSIVE inferiority(?) complex, and probably ALSO has a VERY poor self-image..
which he chooses to inflict on the people who frequent his forum..

He says he's developing these games for his "fan-base" yet that base seems to
be getting smaller and smaller since the release of BCM..probably because when
people go to his COMMERIAL GAME site (so it technically ISN'T a private
forum...) what do they see?? Ridicule, condescendion(?), and rampent arrogance
BY the developer of the game against ANYONE who either posts about BUGS in the
games (either games [BC3K/BCM] as they BOTH contain bugs..)..or has an honest
critism about the games..

..and how does he respond to those people who take thier time to post about bug
issues or critisms?? He either INSULTS them outright without reason or cause,
SUSPENDS them or BANS them entirely.. then more often then not DELETES the
posts in question...which I believe, speaks for itself...

It seems very disturbing when the owner of a company CHOOSES to alienate, and
insult the very people to support his games..and to me seems a very illogical
way to sustain and build a fan-base..more-less a company..

I have both BC3K 2.07 (patched to 2.09), and BCM (with all patches), but with
BCM, I had ONE HELL of a time even trying to install the damn game,,, couldn't
keep it running for more then 30 minutes WITHOUT it crashing back into
windows.. so I took it, and put it up on the shelve, and went back to playing
FFE (Frontier: First Encounters) and BC3K.. I read ALL the tech threads on HIS
forum about BCM, but still could never get the game to run right..(hmmm,,,must
be my severe lack of intelligence...NOT the game itself...yeah THAT MUST be
it...) never bothered to register it and consider it a complete waste of my
hard-earned $50! (hopefully it will eventually get the patch it needs to RUN
correctly..SCREW MP, I just want it to RUN!)

But I still play BC3K 2.09, even though it DOES have certain bugs in the game
which CAN be proven...( i really don't care if a game has bugs in it as long as
it's a good game and it's reasonably stable... FFE had/has alot of bugs as well
and I play it more then I play any other game...) ..as I still play Daggerfall
and Pirates Gold and a ton of other games that I enjoy but contain bugs...

Every other game site I've ever been to was helpful and at least acknowledged
my complaints..but not Derek, which again.. speaks for itself...

I really like BC3K 2.09.. it's fun and complex, with tons of things to do and
interesting places to go (once you get your BC crew's AI above 75)..and
REGARDLESS of Derek or his forum, will always play it.. BCM, I'd love to play
the game, but it doesn't run that well, and I AIN'T about to ask Derek or
anyone on his forum, 'cause I ain't a brown-noser...never been..never will be,
and I DON'T choose to be insulted by people I've never even met before...

The BC community (if you completely EXCLUDED Derek) is also fun and
interesting, with a lot of kewl people, but it's getting to the point where
it's really nothing more then a POLICE state, where you have to watch every
comment and post lest you be smitten by the "iron fist" of Derek or his
"toadies"...and where is the fun in that???

...but it seems I'm preaching to the choir here.. :D

I'll go back to lurking now...


0 new messages