You will be able to see you own head in 3D! Seriously, from what I've read,
you won't see much improvement in 2D performance or image quality. 3D gets
the biggest boost. The G450 is like a TNT 2 ultra but the G550's 3D
performace is close to a GeForce 2 MX. I don't know about any differences
when it come to using TV out, though, which seems to be your biggest area of
concern. As you already know, the G550 has much better support for flat
panels LCDs.
Later,
Steven
--
___ ____________
Steven Whatley <<<((__O\ (__<>___<>__ \ ____ Don't get rattled by
swha...@blkbox.com \ \_(__<>___<>__)\O\_/O___>-< what I say. It's just
Houston, Texas \O__<>___<>___<>)\___/ my opinion.
I had a G400 DH with a RR G and had to upgrade when I upgraded to XP and
found out Matrox has no intention to support the RR in XP. So I purchased a
Radeon 8500 (supports flat panel) and AverTV Studio. The Radeon still has
some driver issues but I feel the 2D is clearer and color better on my
Diamond Pro 900u than the G400.
With Matrox appearing to be abandonning the consumer video card market my
advice is to find another manufacture. ATI may not be right for you, but
pick a manufacturer that you know will be supporting your card in a year or
two.
Eric
"hagie" <ha...@teleport.com> wrote in message
news:VYyK7.5504$m_4.2...@nntp2.onemain.com...
Greetings,
Cedric
"hagie" <ha...@teleport.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:ZgHK7.1751$5X4.2...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...